This is topic Google bombing for a good cause--It seems to have worked *crosses fingers* in forum Books, Films, Food and Culture at Hatrack River Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.hatrack.com/ubb/main/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=023184

Posted by Shigosei (Member # 3831) on :
 
It seems that the number one site when you do a Google search for Jew is an anti-semitic website called Jew Watch. The Jerusalem Post has an article about the whole matter. Google, of course, won't manually change the rankings, so there's been an attempt at Google bombing to raise the ranking of Wikipedia's entry on Jews. It's up to number three now, right behind jewfaq.org, which has also probably been linked to with greater frequency lately.

Edit to add: One of the ways Google works is that it keeps track of the text used to link to a site. If a lot of people link to a site using a particular word, then a search for that word will turn up that site on Google, even if that site does not contain the word itself. For example, if you do a Google search for "miserable failure," the first site you will see is Bush's bio. Google bombing usually takes a cooperative effort--you have to spread the meme around. Most of the bombing is done by bloggers. More on Google bombing

[ April 15, 2004, 08:14 AM: Message edited by: Shigosei ]
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
What's Google-bombing?
 
Posted by digging_holes (Member # 6237) on :
 
I don't know either. [Dont Know]
 
Posted by Suneun (Member # 3247) on :
 
part of google's rank system uses the number of times a site has been linked to. That's how the "weapons of mass destruction" 404 error page was done.

so they're looking for people to link to the jew wikipedia site to increase its ranking.
 
Posted by Lara (Member # 132) on :
 
The Disgruntled American's 101 Reasons to be Offended. Reason #63...
 
Posted by eslaine (Member # 5433) on :
 
LOL! I loved the Weapons of Mass Destruction not found page. The French Military Victories page even fooled me when I knew it was coming.

Thanks for the link on Google-bombing!
 
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
 
Nicely done, Shigosei and co-bombers. [Smile] Right now, searching for Jew shows the Wikipedia article at number two, and jewfaq.com (one of my favorite sites! [Big Grin] ) at number three.
 
Posted by Shigosei (Member # 3831) on :
 
The Wikipedia site is now first on the list!

Of course, it would also be nice if this great site about Jews were above Jew Watch. Jewfaq has made several appearances in Rivka's thread, so it's obviously a very good source. Don't Jew think so? (Apologies for the bad pun, but I couldn't help sneaking another link in there).

[ April 15, 2004, 07:46 AM: Message edited by: Shigosei ]
 
Posted by vwiggin (Member # 926) on :
 
as of 4:59 am, PST, mission not yet accomplished. [Frown]
 
Posted by luthe (Member # 1601) on :
 
Try Germany
or Canada
 
Posted by Shigosei (Member # 3831) on :
 
Hm...odd, Wikipedia's entry was at the top a few minutes ago. I swear I wasn't hallucinating!
 
Posted by vwiggin (Member # 926) on :
 
That means we are on the CUSP of beating it. Any one link could make a difference. [Smile]
 
Posted by Shigosei (Member # 3831) on :
 
Look! Look! It's on top again!
 
Posted by vwiggin (Member # 926) on :
 
Ummmm no. [Smile]
 
Posted by vwiggin (Member # 926) on :
 
Yay!

[The Wave]
 
Posted by Shigosei (Member # 3831) on :
 
*phew, I wasn't hallucinating*

Jew Jew Jew Jew

[ April 15, 2004, 08:13 AM: Message edited by: Shigosei ]
 
Posted by Richard Berg (Member # 133) on :
 
Unfortunately Google doesn't index sites with a '?' in them. The easiest way for this crowd to GoogleBomb is to have the college students use their webspace -- so long as it's on the same domain, they get a giant PageRank boost for free.
 
Posted by fugu13 (Member # 2859) on :
 
Oh really?

http://www.google.com/search?q=fugu13&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

You might notice the abundant ?'s.
 
Posted by Richard Berg (Member # 133) on :
 
Hmm. Maybe the sites where this excuse has been used just have a really restrictive .robots file.
 
Posted by fugu13 (Member # 2859) on :
 
Quite possibly. Also, I predict they're given a bit less precedence as regards the sites they link to.
 
Posted by Tristan (Member # 1670) on :
 
Hmm, I've read that the Google staff frown upon deliberate manipulation of site ranking and may penalize a site that engage in such practices. Hopefully it might not be an issue in this case though.
 
Posted by fugu13 (Member # 2859) on :
 
They don't penalize directly (but only through manipulating the generalized algorithm), except for certain particularly blatant (and commercial) abuses. And the answer is often a simple de-listing.

Stuff like this is fine.
 


Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2