There are no weapons, we've caputured all of the threats, all we are doing over there in Iraq is wasting money. Why don't we spend that money over in North Korea were they have Nukes and they are almost equally pissed at us as Al-Quida. I am not saying that the soldiers in Iraq are dying in vain, no the oposite, i was for this war, but the war is over. We should mabye stay there until the end of there elections, but we must start focusing on NK.
Posted by Storm Saxon (Member # 3101) on :
Because any day now diplomacy is going to work and there'll be a chicken in every pot and the lion will lay down with the lamb.
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
Because we can't invade Korea, they actually have an army. That's why.
Posted by Storm Saxon (Member # 3101) on :
Well, more to the point, they now have, supposedly, several nukes.
Posted by Alcon (Member # 6645) on :
Becuase if we invaded Korea, they would simply launch any nukes they have and wipe out a few cities. Even if they don't have nukes, we've already tried invading Korea once... didn't work overwell.
Posted by raventh1 (Member # 3750) on :
Because they have better broadband than us.
I think the US should back off from the world police role, and be more of a neighborly entity. Like if canada started attacking mexico, or russia, or you know mexico tries to take over texas. Things like that.
Other than that the US 'forces' should probably only be out to give humanitarian aid when it is wanted or requested. (Not to mention what it should always be doing - Homeland defense... Homeland is starting to turn into a bad word.)
Countries can be friendly to each other, but they are not individuals, and not friends as I am to my friends.
Posted by Trisha the Severe Hottie (Member # 6000) on :