This is topic I almost bit my tongue off in forum Books, Films, Food and Culture at Hatrack River Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.hatrack.com/ubb/main/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=031508

Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
"If we hadn't created Israel we wouldn't be in this mess."

This is the most intelligent thing I've heard from the table next to mine over the last 15 minutes.

"I've seen who DC elects - they shouldn't have a say in anything."

This isn't the least intelligent thing I've heard from them in the last 15 minutes.

*Must. Stay. Silent.*

Dagonee
 
Posted by Lady Jane (Member # 7249) on :
 
Stay strong, Dagonee. Stay strong. *bumps fists with Dag*
 
Posted by Bob the Lawyer (Member # 3278) on :
 
You might want to check out Allegra's headphones thread.

I'm just sayin'.
 
Posted by Miro (Member # 1178) on :
 
Context?
 
Posted by IdemosthenesI (Member # 862) on :
 
Dag. You should tell them that God's a chicken! It eorked for me [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
Apparantly the State of the Union address.

There's been no clear thesis by any participants nor order to the conversation. Those two sentences were within 1 minute of each other.

Dagonee
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
It eorked for me
That even sounds like something a chicken would say.

Dagonee
 
Posted by IdemosthenesI (Member # 862) on :
 
What can I say. I'm God.
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
quote:
"I've seen who DC elects - they shouldn't have a say in anything."

Wait- does this mean the District of Columbia doesn't get to vote? I've read something about something like this but I couldn't really believe it, but this just adds to it.

What's with the District of Columbia?
 
Posted by mothertree (Member # 4999) on :
 
So... you don't have any thoughts on Marion Berry being re-elected after he was finished with his jail term? I have to admit I have no idea who is in office now. I mean, I don't agree that it is a reason for D.C. to have no say in anything. I don't think a lot of the elected heads of my state all the time.
 
Posted by Jay (Member # 5786) on :
 
Why stay silent? Speak your mind!
 
Posted by Jonathan Howard (Member # 6934) on :
 
quote:
"If we hadn't created Israel we wouldn't be in this mess."
Sure, but the US wanted Israel to be present. Besides, Israel, over the past 57 years, made life in the Middle East a lot easier. That is, in '67, '69 and '73.

JH
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
What's with the District of Columbia?
They have "home rule" that can be overridden by laws passed by Congress and signed by the President. They have no representation in Congress, but they get a vote for president as if they were a state.

Dagonee
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
Oh. How come? Is it because they're too small or what?
 
Posted by fugu13 (Member # 2859) on :
 
For a long time it was because most of DC is black.
 
Posted by TheHumanTarget (Member # 7129) on :
 
D.C. is an interesting problem.

D.C. is allowed to self-govern, set taxes, and enact laws. However, Congress dictates funding levels, and has the power to overrule most D.C. governmental functions. The citizens of D.C. do not belong to Maryland or Virginia, and have no representative in the House or in Congress. 90% of people work work in D.C. live outside the city, so D.C. bears the overhead for infrstructure support and repair. It has one of the largest police forces in the country, in large part because it is the seat of the federal government.
 
Posted by TheHumanTarget (Member # 7129) on :
 
Fugu13, that is the most ignorant thing I've ever heard. Most of Detroit is black, but they are allowed to self-govern. D.C. is the capital city. It was decided that no state should be given the prestige of hosting the nations capital, so instead was given the land it now resides on.
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
But WHY, though? I mean, that seems somewhat undemocratic. I mean "Everyone gets represented... except you."

EDIT:

Oh, so I can imagine it doesn't get a Senator but how come no representative? Did they run out of chairs or something in the House of Representatives [Wink] ?

[ February 03, 2005, 02:20 PM: Message edited by: Teshi ]
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
Fugu, DC didn't exist when those rules were made. Expansions to home rule occurred after DC was majority black.

The Federal district was set up to not be part of a state, so that it would be independent of state control. The lack of congressional representation is a holdover of this.

My proposal is 1 Senator and the number of Representatives they would be eligibile for as a state.

Dagonee
 
Posted by mothertree (Member # 4999) on :
 
Does D.C. have enough residents?
 
Posted by IdemosthenesI (Member # 862) on :
 
I don't like the idea of having an odd number off senators, though. Don't ask me why. Perhaps it's time to allow them to vote for representatives in one of the neighboring state. Sort of a political annexation if not an actual one.
 
Posted by IdemosthenesI (Member # 862) on :
 
Not to mention that the number of people relative to the representation they would have would make DC residents vastly OVERrepresented.
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
I think there's one state with fewer residents.
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
But... surely they should have representation?

Also, how does the whole "No taxation without representation" thing line up with an underrepresented city? I know that's an ancient mantra, but I think it fundamentally has got the right idea. Are there taxes in D.C.?

Why aren't the D.Cions clamoring angrily about all this?

quote:
I don't like the idea of having an odd number off senators, though.
It because it looks better when they line up neatly in pairs. The senators came in two by two, hurrah, hurrah...
 
Posted by hugh57 (Member # 5527) on :
 
quote:
Does D.C. have enough residents?
I can name, off the top of my head, three states that have fewer residents than DC: Alaska, Vermont and Wyoming. [Smile]
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
So... really there's no excuse.
 
Posted by mothertree (Member # 4999) on :
 
Umm, hard numbers would be appreciated. :goes off to look:
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
I can name, off the top of my head, three states that have fewer residents than DC: Alaska, Vermont and Wyoming.
Nope. Just Wyoming.

quote:
Also, how does the whole "No taxation without representation" thing line up with an underrepresented city? I know that's an ancient mantra, but I think it fundamentally has got the right idea. Are there taxes in D.C.?

Why aren't the D.Cions clamoring angrily about all this?

They are. In fact, they have official license plates with "Taxation without Representation" on them. Link.

Dagonee

[ February 03, 2005, 02:32 PM: Message edited by: Dagonee ]
 
Posted by mothertree (Member # 4999) on :
 
Populations by state

Okay, I'm ignorant. So in what year did D.C. obtain enough citizens for statehood?
 
Posted by hugh57 (Member # 5527) on :
 
quote:
Nope. Just Wyoming.
Thanks for the link, adam613. Apparently, I had the 1990 census in mind. My bad. [Smile]
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
Well, either way. I think this is undemocratic and kind of... odd, especially in a country that is as forward as America.

You Americans are Crazy! [Smile]

ps. isn't there somekind of "all citizens should have the vote" in the constitution that causes trouble with this?
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
Sure, quote me and thank adam, fugu. [Cry]

[ February 03, 2005, 02:45 PM: Message edited by: Dagonee ]
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
I know that not having the vote when there's no reason (or excuse) is undemocratic.

Dag: *pat pat* If it's any consolation you helped a poor undereducated Canadian become angry about the state of a couple thousand Americans [Smile] .
 
Posted by hugh57 (Member # 5527) on :
 
Knew I was forgetting something...

[Hail] Dagonee

[Edit: typo]

[ February 03, 2005, 02:47 PM: Message edited by: hugh57 ]
 
Posted by Jonathan Howard (Member # 6934) on :
 
I hate to apply technicality, but Canadians are Americans, so are Equadorians.
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
I hate to stick my tongue out at you, JH, but

[Razz]

And I mean Americans in the United States of America sense. When I mean Everyone On the American Continent, I say North, Central or/and South Americans.
 
Posted by fugu13 (Member # 2859) on :
 
I was thinking in large part of this part of Dagonee's statement:
quote:
They have "home rule" that can be overridden by laws passed by Congress and signed by the President.
DC didn't even get that limited capability (a commonly elected mayor, and a council that could decide anything but the banal) until long after its founding, and it was because it was mostly black. People should do a little reading on Theodore Bilbo for examples of one guy who worked to keep home rule out of the hands of black people.

edit to be clear: entire post is not really directed at Dag

[ February 03, 2005, 03:35 PM: Message edited by: fugu13 ]
 
Posted by Jonathan Howard (Member # 6934) on :
 
I know, it was for the PostCount.
 
Posted by mothertree (Member # 4999) on :
 
quote:
a couple thousand Americans
Psst, it's over half a million. At least in my link.
 
Posted by Miro (Member # 1178) on :
 
quote:
Why aren't the D.Cions clamoring angrily about all this?
We are. But not many people outside the District actually care enough to listen. For example: about a year ago (I think) I posted a thread about this very issue. It died mighty quick.

The situation in DC is a catch-22. Those of us who it affects have no vote in Congress to changed anything. Those who can elect voting members to Congress aren't affected and probably won't fight for us.

Just one note: we do have one representative to the House of Representatives. She just doesn't get to vote.
 
Posted by TheHumanTarget (Member # 7129) on :
 
Miro,
 
Posted by TheHumanTarget (Member # 7129) on :
 
D.C. is the federal seat of power, and as such cannot be given a status that is equal to those of its constituent parts(i.e. states). The separation of State and Federal government will not allow D.C. to have any more influence in national matters than it already does. That doesn't mean that some form of representation is not needed, but most people dismiss any notion of D.C. being given more governing power because it is generally couched in the context of statehood. D.C. cannot become a state. The sooner the residents of D.C. come to grips with this, the sooner progress can be made to address legitimate concerns.

Also, if all else fails, and residents are hell-bound for their "state" right, they could move to Maryland or Virginia. [Razz]
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
Miro: I'm upset. And I'm not even an American.

If I was your one Representative in the House I would be very Loud and Insistant until someone listened.

You just don't go about depriving random groups people of votes, it's unconstitutional (except not in America).
 
Posted by James Tiberius Kirk (Member # 2832) on :
 
DC does have those Taxation without Representation liscense plates. Huh. That sounds oddly familiar.... [Wink]

Part of the problem is that while DC is the seat of power, most Washingtonians have no direct say in what happens on Capitol Hill or elsewhere. It's kinda sad; for instance, when the World Bank heads down there to do whatever they do, protesters come from far and wide saying that they indend to block the streets "shut the city down"-- forgetting that there are people who live there.

There was that plan in the House of Delegates here a looooong time ago to "adopt" DC. I'm not sure what happened to it, though.

--j_k
 
Posted by Miro (Member # 1178) on :
 
quote:
Also, if all else fails, and residents are hell-bound for their "state" right, they could move to Maryland or Virginia.

This kind of crap really pisses me off. I don't think you quite realize the severity of the issue here. Congress has ultimate control of basically everything that happens in DC. I'm not just talking about security issues and such. This affects schools, parks, taxes, everything. And yet those of use directly affected by the decisions that Congress makes have no say in what those decisions are. The injustice is mind-boggling.

I think part of the problem is that most people don't realize that there is more to DC than just the monuments or the federal government. There's an actual city there, with people who have the same types of everyday concerns as any other American. Imagine if New York City were in the same situation that DC is in. It's not that outlandish an idea, Congress did sit there in the 18th century. Should the people of New York City have to move to New Jersey just to be able to experience the realities of democracy and self-government that are supposed to be the foundation of the United States?
 
Posted by TheHumanTarget (Member # 7129) on :
 
Miro,
I fully understand the situation. I've lived in this area for 20 years, and every five years we get to hear about the push for D.C. to become a state. The same arguments are presented again and again. I'd imagine that what becomes frustrating is that the core issues are never fully addressed. It's not even like this is a new situation. The law governing the rule of D.C. has been in effect since 1801, and there are sound reasons that explain why the Constitution was interpreted this way.

If you truly want to make any progress toward more self-rule, then you have to abandon the false idea of statehood and begin looking at other ways of making progress, because the reality of the situation is that our existing structure allows no room for interpretation.

Here's a link to an interesting article on the problems facing D.C. http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/dc-in-maryland.html

As Always,
The Human Target
 


Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2