This is topic Help selecting a LCD Monitor in forum Books, Films, Food and Culture at Hatrack River Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.hatrack.com/ubb/main/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=045957

Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
I am looking to replace a CRT monitor that died. I am currently borrowing a friends old CRT, and I need to get it back to him fairly soon.

I have a decent computer, and have upgraded things on it a bit, but I am not a hardcore gamer. I don't need, nor can I afford, a top of the line monitor, but I don't want a piece of junk either.


Any suggestions? I am probably looking to spend about $200, and am probably looking at the 17" ones, although I have seen a few good deals for 19" as well.
 
Posted by TheTick (Member # 2883) on :
 
I don't own this, but this BenQ 20.1 inch LCD is $200 plus $14 shipping if you use the code BENQFP202W9403 at checkout. Not sure when that expires, though. Seems to have pretty decent reviews by the buyers at Newegg.
 
Posted by Euripides (Member # 9315) on :
 
I would suggest Viewsonic. They're relatively cheap (depending upon who you get it from), great quality, and usually adjustable. I have this 19" and absolutely love it.
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
I was just looking at Newegg before I checked back here. [Smile]


The lower the ms the better the response time is,,and the better the picture is, right? So overall a 4ms response time is better than a 12ms one, and an 8 is inbetween?

Is ViewSonic a decent company? Their products seem to have very decent reviews, and are in my price range.

I have heard varying things about Acer, so I tend to avoid them.


Is there any brand I should stay away from?
 
Posted by Euripides (Member # 9315) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Kwea:

The lower the ms the better the response time is,,and the better the picture is, right? So overall a 4ms response time is better than a 12ms one, and an 8 is inbetween?

Yep, that's right. That is, the lower the number the faster the picture updates. It's importance depends on what you want to do with your computer - games, film, word processing...
 
Posted by TheTick (Member # 2883) on :
 
Ars has a great guide about flat panels, what all the numbers mean and how important they are.

Here's more at Anandtech. They like Samsung over BenQ in general but had them 1-2 for gaming panels.
 
Posted by fugu13 (Member # 2859) on :
 
Best Buy is going to have some amazing deals on monitors on black friday:

http://bfads.net/store/bestbuy

Heck, a 22" one with decent stats will be within your $200 budget, if you're willing to brave the day. Be warned, that's not the best company, but its an okay monitor (and a spectacular one for that price).

For non-black friday monitors, this one's a little beyond your price range, but you might look at its relatives. I intend to have it for a second monitor someday when I have money to spare: http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/11/dell-busts-out-e207wfp-20-inch-lcd-for-the-budget-set/ Its one of the best bang for your buck monitors out there in that size range.
 
Posted by TheTick (Member # 2883) on :
 
Best Buy on Black Friday = 10 in stock, 300 people waiting in line for them.
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
What about MAG as a brand? BB has a 17' one for $79.... [Wink]


How about Acer? I read some reviews on Newegg and they were very positive, and the price is right as well...


I am working, at 5 am, on Black Friday. [Frown]
 
Posted by erosomniac (Member # 6834) on :
 
Dude, forget the 22" for $200...they have a freaking 32" for $479?!

Well, I know what I'm doing on black friday. [Frown]
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
Good...but $200 is maxed out for me. Not only do I not need more, and really can't afford more right now.

Here is a link to newegg to some 19" ones. I don't really care if I get a 19" or a 17", but I really don't know anything about these brad names at all.
 
Posted by fugu13 (Member # 2859) on :
 
In the long run you'll be a lot happier with a 19" if you can swing it.

Yeah, its good to avoid off-brands in monitors, and its often hard to tell which is and which isn't. Given the reviews linked, though, I'd suggest this monitor:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16824014111R
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
high refresh rate ftw


also, i have some problems with my lcd, it now makes a popping sound and the screen fades to black like a dark hole, and will randomnly work it does this after I turn off both the screen and the computer.
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
OK....I have two strong contenders.
This is one..............and This is the other one.


One is a 19", and the other is a 20.1, the one linked to above. The promo code still works on the one that is 20.1, so it is $200...but it has a 8ms refresh rate. The 19" has a 2ms refresh rate.....but is 1.1 inches smaller.


As long as the promo code hold true, they are dead even right now.


Any preferences?
 
Posted by fugu13 (Member # 2859) on :
 
The 19" real refresh rate is probably more like 5 to 7, but yeah, its faster. How much gaming do you do? If the answer is not much, then get the 20.1". Space helps a lot in productivity applications (and another 1.1" diagonal is quite a bit of space), but response time is very important in keeping fast-paced gaming fluid.
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
I don't powergame by any means, but I do play some games.
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
I checked ebay, and there are people selling that code (or trying to, anyway) for the BenQ.


I am leaning towards the 19", just because what I mostly do is not productive...meaning I don't do work stuff at home. The widescreen factor of the 20.1 is nice, but not necessary.


Then again, a 8ms isn't bad for gaming, is it?
 
Posted by dantesparadigm (Member # 8756) on :
 
Good news, w00t to the rescue, today they're offering a 19" LCD monitor for $109 after a hundred dollar rebate. Just keep in mind, you have to act quickly, assuming you see this today.
 
Posted by Euripides (Member # 9315) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Kwea:

Then again, a 8ms isn't bad for gaming, is it?

Sure, that's actually very good.
 
Posted by Icarus (Member # 3162) on :
 
Beaten to the punch by dantesparadigm . . .
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
Just missed it....darn!
 


Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2