FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » How do I make an annotated bilbiography?

   
Author Topic: How do I make an annotated bilbiography?
Annie
Member
Member # 295

 - posted      Profile for Annie   Email Annie         Edit/Delete Post 
I can't seem to find an official source that explains to me how to do an annotated bibliography - my Little Brown Handbook doesn't even mention it.

So, does anyone know of any good examples of this? Do I simply discuss each source after I list the information? I'm confused.

Posts: 8504 | Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Hobbes
Member
Member # 433

 - posted      Profile for Hobbes   Email Hobbes         Edit/Delete Post 
That's what I thought, just put a short paragraph explaining what you got out of each source.

Hobbes [Smile]

Posts: 10602 | Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
advice for robots
Member
Member # 2544

 - posted      Profile for advice for robots           Edit/Delete Post 
A bilbiography?

Might have to contact the Tolkein estate for that one. [Smile]

Posts: 5957 | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Annie
Member
Member # 295

 - posted      Profile for Annie   Email Annie         Edit/Delete Post 
hee hee. Apparently I can't type on 3 hours of sleep.
Posts: 8504 | Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bob_Scopatz
Member
Member # 1227

 - posted      Profile for Bob_Scopatz   Email Bob_Scopatz         Edit/Delete Post 
The format may differ, so if your prof has a preference you should find out. But the information is usually as follows:

1) Complete citation (author, title, journal/book, publisher, page reference, date...)

2) A brief (1-3 paragraphs) synopsis of the material. If it's a research report, you would want to include specifics about the subject population (college students, lab rats, etc.) If it's in a different academic discipline, there are probably some standard things you'd want to capture (period in history, classification of art, whatever). Then you talk about the author's conclusions. You can give your own opinion in this as well, but if you do, you should make it plain that you are doing so. Don't switch from "abstracting" the document to commenting on it without being VERY obvious. I usually stated my opinions in a separate paragraph at the end of my abstract. Or created a separate heading for "opinion" as opposed to "abstract or summary."

3) if this is to be used in a database, some key words might also be helpful. Things that you could use later to look up this (and similar) article and retrieve the information.

4) Again, if this is to be put in a database, you might want to add a separate section for things like # of references, how you found the article (e.g., referenced by Smith et al. 1998), and maybe even a cross-indexing thing that would work like key words/concepts, but at a somewhat more abstract level...

It'd help to have a format first.

It'd obviously help to know if this stuff is intended for a database or if you are just doing this as a paper exercise to learn how to do annotated bibliographies.

Posts: 22497 | Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Annie
Member
Member # 295

 - posted      Profile for Annie   Email Annie         Edit/Delete Post 
Wow! Thanks!

It's for an art history paper, and the citations are in-text, MLA style. I think he's having us annotate it just so he knows we're not just listing sources to fll our requirements.

Posts: 8504 | Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jeni
Member
Member # 1454

 - posted      Profile for Jeni   Email Jeni         Edit/Delete Post 
I'd ask before you go through all that writing. I had to do one last semester, and the professor only wanted a sentence or two, not full paragraphs.
Posts: 4292 | Registered: Jan 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
katharina
Member
Member # 827

 - posted      Profile for katharina   Email katharina         Edit/Delete Post 
My final paper for Roman history, instead of being a paper, was an annotated bibliography with thirty sources and 600-800 words for each citation. I thoroughly enjoyed that.
Posts: 26077 | Registered: Mar 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
pooka
Member
Member # 5003

 - posted      Profile for pooka   Email pooka         Edit/Delete Post 
My opinion is that I would mention what about that source is relevant to my paper.
Posts: 11017 | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bob_Scopatz
Member
Member # 1227

 - posted      Profile for Bob_Scopatz   Email Bob_Scopatz         Edit/Delete Post 
I would definitely get some further direction from the prof. It seems like there's enough room for doubt and I'd hate to see you do way too much work just because you took my format and used it.

Or, conversely, if you did the wrong thing (synopsizing without giving your opinion) or whatever.

The point of an annotated bibliography, to me, was that I could later scan my entries and recall the paper without having to re-read it (unless I was going to cite it in detail in a per). So I always put in enough detail to allow me to cite that same article not just for the project I was working on currently, but for, perhaps, some future different project as well.

Posts: 22497 | Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
littlemissattitude
Member
Member # 4514

 - posted      Profile for littlemissattitude   Email littlemissattitude         Edit/Delete Post 
Well, all of the annotated bibliographies I've had to do have needed at least a short paragraph, after the bibliographical information, to explain what the source was about and how it will be relevant to the paper you are writing. In one case, we were required to do a paraphrase of relevant information from half the sources, and exact quotes from half the sources, and to submit a copy of the page or pages for the paraphrased sources so that the professor could see that we were actually paraphrasing, and not embellishing on what the source really said.

And, yes, I too suspected that the professors requiring them just wanted to make sure we were really at least skimming the sources rather than just listing them. However, I found having to prepare them before the actual paper was written to be very helpful in remembering what information was in which source when I sat down to write the paper.

Posts: 2454 | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2