posted
Have you ever thought how colo(u)rful out English tongue is? It isn't gra/ey and dull; no one would place an ax(e) on it and claim it is so because it's boring, that's just irrationalis/zing facts. It ven has various ways of spelling!
Now, what really was the background for this? I heard that The Greatest American Philosopher Of All Times (Mark Twain) initiated it, even 'tho' 'thru' didn't make it. So what's Danny Webby (Daniel Webster) got to do with it? Did he formalis/ze the whole business?
BTW, for reference - I'll place the differences here:
posted
Huh. By my spelling, I'm apparently half British. No wonder I can never remember how anything's spelled. I must read books with the British spellings and then can't decide if it's realise or realize.
posted
Actually, in British English you can actually spell both -ise and -ize; despite the fact that -ise is the proper form. Most people today spell organize, not organise, in British-spelling communities, as far as I've seen.
posted
Daniel Webster was a 19th century American statesman from New Hampshire and, later, Massachusetts. Noah Webster was the American lexicographer from Connecticutt.
Noah Webster sought to make spelling more phonetic. He does not seem to have been consistent in his pursuit, but many differences between US and British spelling are directly traced to the influence of Webster's lexicography.
The Merriam brothers George and Charles purchased the rights to the dictionary after Noah's death. The term "Webster's" became synonymous with "American Dictionary," and repeated attempts to protect the trademark met with mixed results at the beginning of the 20th century. In 1982, the G&C Merriam company changed its name to Merriam-Webster to further strengthen its association with the trademark.
I keep intending to read a biography of the man to chase down more information on the choices he made, but I never seem to get around to it.
I can recommend The Meaning of Everything by Simon Winchester. The book is about the writing of the Oxford English Dictionary, but it gives a good general history of lexicography as well.
posted
I don't know many people who spell axe without the e. Practice is spelled the same here. No one spells it practise (That I know of). Management is spelled with the e, Judgement is interchangeable (with and without the E) according to most usage and grammar books. As for additions, defense and defence is a good one. About Webster, his dictionary mainly served to standardize spelling and definitions for American English. Since the British thought we were all uncivilized dogs and that our language was dispicable, it was probably a good idea to just set up our own way of doing things. Neither way is more correct than the other, but one way is more popular (I don't know the exact numbers for it so I don't know which one actually is more commonly used)
Posts: 3003 | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Americans have used both ax and axe for some time. Also grey and gray.
We have never spelled practice as practise; nor have we ever spelled management as managment. (urk!)
However, there is one thing that we have right, and y'all across the pond have murderized.
If I am correctly aligned in space and time, I am oriented. If not; then I am disoriented. Not, for the love of all that is good and holy, "orientated" and "disorientated."
posted
According to the Webster's, practic/se, noun and verb, can be either way for both. Ditto for licenc/se and others. In british you MUST have c for the noun and s for the verb.
I saw in a Hebrew English disctionary that "American spelling is judgment and managment". Then, again, Israli-purchased dictionary.
A teacher of mine, of american origin, said that it's technically possible, but uncommon; just like gaol and quire.
Orientate? Huh? Who says that?
Posts: 2978 | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
"But you spell it "throo" t-h-r-u, and I'm with you on that, because we spell it "thruff," and that's just someone trying to cheat at scrabble."
Posts: 3056 | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'll give you a fake dollar if you can tell me who the originator of that argument was, Jonny.
Posts: 4534 | Registered: Jan 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
As I understand it, the verb "orient" originally meant: to face the rising sun. Hence, the east is the "orient."
I don't know how "orientated" originated, but it smacks of the same kind of thing that I was talking about in my of(t)en thread, where people choose to overpronounce something, and then act superior, as if everybody else is pronouncing it wrong.
Posts: 3735 | Registered: Mar 2002
| IP: Logged |
What you're forgetting is that it isn't just American versus British spelling. There's also Canadian, Indian, Sri Lankan, etc etc etc. It's just that the Brits and the Yanks are the loudest and most obnoxious about it. Posts: 8355 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Actually, I think the oriented/orientated thing is more about a confusion over rules of word-formation than of word-pronunciation.
Posts: 3056 | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
