Basically, students, particularly those with little opportunity to participate in journalistic experiences, think that freedom of speech isn't that big a deal.
While I disagree strongly with the federal government mandating something be taught about on a particular day, as is done with the day the Constitution was signed (apparently), efforts along that line by school corporations should be a higher priority.
However, even topic based education is not as valuable as experiential education; unfortunately, having a student press/media (even a very limited one) is expensive. Those programs arre commonly early on the block when funding is low, and rarely reinstated/reenlarged unless funding picks up considerably.
Posts: 15770 | Registered: Dec 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
And amusedly enough, I saw this on CNN before I saw it on Slashdot, despite generally checking Slashdot more frequently.
Posts: 15770 | Registered: Dec 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
The actual question and response statistics for the question I believe they're referring to:
quote:45. Newspapers should be allowed to publish freely without government approval of a story. 24% Strongly agree 27 Mildly agree 22 Mildly disagree 14 Strongly disagree 13 Don’t know
quote:41. Overall, do you think the press in America has too much freedom to do what it wants, too little freedom to do what it wants, or is the amount of freedom the press has about right?
32% Too much freedom
10 Too little freedom
37 About right
21 Don’t know
There are quite a few more, such as that 74% mildly to strongly (by far mostly strongly) feel people shouldn't be allowed to burn the flag as a political statement.
Posts: 15770 | Registered: Dec 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
Looks like the first amendment is going the way of the second and tenth. And section 1 of the fourteenth for that matter.
Why can't we respect all aspects of our constitution.
Free Speech, Guns, No federal programs except those specifically listed in the constitution and equal protection under the law - even for homosexuals.
Posts: 7085 | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
Keep in mind these are high school students. What do you expect after 13 years of socialistic indoctrination? Don't get me wrong, I'm glad I got my 3 R's, but I think acquiring the 3 R's has to come before learning to question authority, or the 3 R's never get learned.
Posts: 383 | Registered: Nov 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Sitting in a class with 30 kids obeying the adult up front.
I missed the thread Narnia just had about education, so I apologize if I've failed to make the evolution with the rest of hatrack on this. But my idea of the public education system is that it is designed to produce good employees/workers.
P.P.S. Think of the ironically dystopian sight of a classroom with a copy of "The night Thoreau spent in Jail" on every desk.
posted
I resent your implications, Trisha. Look, there's no question the average elementary thru high school classroom is somewhat socialistic. I tell my students that my class is a benevolent dictatorship -- and when they act up, not so benevolent.
But that doesn't mean I'm indoctrinating them to unquestioningly obey authority. High school students ARE generally bright enough to understand that context matters. Posts: 32919 | Registered: Mar 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Schools indoctrinate children to obey authority. Both left and right wingers like this idea, they just disagree on who the authority is. Socialism is no more authoritarian than is (neo)conservatism than is authoritarianism^W communitarianism.
Posts: 1364 | Registered: Feb 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I would need to double check, but in response to that question, I think those stats have basically been about the same for the last 20 years.
Posts: 13123 | Registered: Feb 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
There's nothing inherently socialistic about a public education system; its one of the most commonly cited examples of an area where a free market approach undermines other free markets.
There's no particular reason the schools have to be places to train better workers; that's if anything a more socialistic stance than schools being about preparing people to think and participate more, resulting on the whole in a better country.
Also, what you're citing is an authoritarian situation, skrika, which isn't socialist at all. Socialism is an economic system. At best it might be communistic, but its not even that, really, as communism isn't really a phenomenon at that level.
Posts: 15770 | Registered: Dec 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
Actually, I've had very few teachers who don't absentmindedly indoctrinate to follow authority: the textbook.
I did, however, have one history teacher who gave extra credit for each factual error we found in the textbook. And if we wrote an essay on why a stupid generalization was, he gave us points on that.
Posts: 1735 | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
See, now that's a problem. [addit: indoctrinating students to see the textbook as the only/final authority]
I do my best to make it clear to students that if there is a conflict between what I say (or something they already know) and the textbook, that they should let me know. Usually starts a good discussion (or at the very least a comment from me that the book has oversimplified a point, or made a statement I disagree with), and I try to bring in other sources.
posted
When I was in high school, I took a Constitutional Law class that was taught by two AU law students. It was great. I learned so much about the Constitution, how it's interpreted, and even basic critical thinking skills. It was through the Marshall-Brennan Program, which tries to promote "constitutional literacy". That class convinced me that learning about the Constitution should be just as basic a subject as geography, history, or any other of the social studies are now.
posted
Arg! What a horrible result to the survey. Talk about decay of America, here it is. Someone needs to slap these kids upside the head.
quote:Federal and state officials, meanwhile, have bemoaned a lack of knowledge of U.S. civics and history among young people. Sen. Robert Byrd, D-West Virginia, has even pushed through a mandate that schools must teach about the Constitution on September 17, the date it was signed in 1787.
This is a GREAT idea.
quote:The study suggests that students embrace First Amendment freedoms if they are taught about them and given a chance to practice them, but schools don't make the matter a priority.
If the schools won't do it then it's up to the freaking parents to teach it! Grrrr... I learned more from my folks then I did from school for about 16 years. It's dangerous for parents to just assume that the school will take care of everything. But, of course, schools tell parents they WILL take care of everything so not surprising most parents are fooled into thinking that.
quote:About nine in 10 principals said it is important for all students to learn some journalism skills, but most administrators say a lack of money limits their media offerings.
What the...?? Money has NOTHING to do with this. I went to a poor Catholic school with computers from the 70's in 1995 and taught on typewriters...and we were taught quite alot about the vital importance of the Constituion/Bill of Rights and all that stuff without "media offerings". What do they mean "media offerings"? All you need for journalism skills is a piece of paper and a pencil. Posts: 4953 | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:And amusedly enough, I saw this on CNN before I saw it on Slashdot, despite generally checking Slashdot more frequently.
Hehe, I can't say the same, but that's because I've been at my computer for most of the day with Thunderbird fetching the Slashdot RSS feed every ten minutes.
This article is really quite depressing though. I was lucky to have a series of really Constitutionally knowledgable teachers in middle and high school.
Does this level of knowledge about the Constitution equate to a similar lack of care if those rights are abridged among many people. That would be incredibly worrying to me.
Posts: 1592 | Registered: Jan 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
The only thing I remember being taught about the constitution is my seventh grade civics class and the fact that the teacher forced us to memorize the preamble.
Me, I forgot the assignment (ADD rearing it's ugly head, I guess!) and didn't work on memorizing it. So the day of, I just sat there listening to everyone who went before me and picked enough of it up to pass with flying colors.
Posts: 14428 | Registered: Aug 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
I had to memorize the Preamble, too. But we also studied the rest of the Constitution, though I remember being confused by parts of it. I do NOT have a brain for politics, which is why I mostly ignore it.
Thought I am feeling a sudden gratitude for my high school U.S. history teacher who made us do weekly "freedom reports". We had to go through the newspaper and clip articles that showed examples of the Bill of Rights in action. I HATED that assignment, but I guess it stuck with me a bit, because I think the Bill of Rights is really important. I don't always agree with or like the way the media reports things (or what they choose to report) but they have the right to do it. And I have the right to ignore most of it and read only those articles that interest me. Posts: 1805 | Registered: Jun 1999
| IP: Logged |
posted
That's why if grade school kids can't pay attention the real meat of the Constitution/Bill of Rights should be forced on students in High School. You'd think teachers/government/parents would remember it was called HIGH school for a reason once. The basics should have been taught in elementry school...and the rest refined in high school. High school's main job is to prepare you for college. How are you supposed to survive college without knowing the basic foundation of our culture? Take civics 088? How are power-hungry people and politicians going to take this when they realize the population is now dumb and turned into cattle? More Rights stripped away till we really are an evil empire....and then the slow death like Byzantium.
Sorry if I'm a little dramatic...but it's a big deal to me.
[ February 01, 2005, 04:27 PM: Message edited by: Telperion the Silver ]
Posts: 4953 | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
My generation knew the preamble to music, because of SchoolHouse Rock.
We had a history teacher get mad at us in 7th grade, and made us all get up and recite the preamble from memory. At least half the song did it in a sing-song voice reminiscent of the cartoon. Me included.
Posts: 26071 | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
We were just talking about this in my government class today. Initially everyone was shocked. Then we watched a movie about how free speech was slowly being held as less and less important by the american public. When we hit the bit about burning flags there was an outcry. Apparently half my class is all for the flag burning ban amendment. A girl behind me said, I quote
"Anyone one who burns a flag has no morals what so ever."
Umm... EXCUSE ME?!?!?!
Someone else said of protesters:
"If they don't like the way we do things in this country, then they should just leave."
What? Do you not know what your country is founded on? I responded by saying "Ok how bout we make it illegal to be a christian. If you're cristian you can just leave." Got a flurry of indignant responses but I didn't really have a chance to get the point across before we continued the video. Still I thought students in my school were smarter than that. Guess they aren't unique in their stupidity. I'm scared for my generation... and I thought we were a generally inteligent and active generation Posts: 3295 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Some of us, Alcon. Like most generations, though, a good portion of us decide they believe the party line and stick to it through thick and thin, no matter what. I knew many, many people in high school who said the same sort of things.
Posts: 4077 | Registered: Jun 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm very comfortable saying that anyone who burns the flag as a form of protest is a jerk, at least in the particular instance.
Posts: 26071 | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Fellow students and I once convinced a room full of college students to vote for an absolutism tempered by assassination style of government over a republic style of government. I'm not surprised by the the survey.
Posts: 1163 | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yep. Like I said, in the instance, so maybe it's better phrased as "acting like a jerk." But yes.
Posts: 26071 | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
About the flag... *sigh* It's not just an icon for the American People and Constitution...it's also a symbol for the current American GOVERNMENT. So if the Government does something horrible, burning the flag is a GREAT idea...because the flag is held sacred...and burning it wakes people up to the idea that not only are the flag-burners protesting the Government, but that the ideals of America are burning because of the betrayal they are protesting.
Posts: 4953 | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
To be even more clear, I'd say it about pro-life protesters burning the flag to protest SCOTUS.
Posts: 26071 | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well, remember, folks, that Rehnquist, the man now sitting as Chief Justice of SCOTUS, wrote the dissent for Texas vs. Johnson (he was fine with flag burning being illegal) when he was just a lowly associate justice. Also, the Republican platform last year still includes a clause supporting a const. amendment to ban it, so if the sanctity of the flag is more important to you than the free expression that it represents, you should be happy with the way things are going...
posted
Interesting; while there are certainly plenty of jerks that burn the flag, during Vietnam there were definitely some people (thinking pretty much of vets here) who did it in full consciousness of the magnitude of the symbolism. I'm pretty certain some of them weren't jerks, but people making one of the most passionate pleas they knew how.
Posts: 15770 | Registered: Dec 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
Nope. Don't buy it, Telp. It pisses people off, and not at the government but at the people doing the burning. It's counterproductive at minimum and insulting to most. It alienates people of good will who might otherwise listen to you.
posted
Well, actually burning the flag is a good way to piss people off and make them hate you and not listen to your ideas at all. Outlawing it, however, is not a good idea. That amendment is there for a reason.
quote:Nope. Don't buy it, Telp. It pisses people off, and not at the government but at the people doing the burning. It's counterproductive at minimum and insulting to most. It alienates people of good will who might otherwise listen to you.
Dagonee
Absolutely. To me, flag burning is equivalent to cross burning. It makes me angry and sick to see KKK members burning a cross, a symbol of something that means a lot to me. I feel just as angry and sick when I see someone burning an American flag.
I don't care who they are, they just lost my attention to their cause. Like Dag said, I'd say the same even if it were a cause I agreed with.
Posts: 14428 | Registered: Aug 2001
| IP: Logged |
quote:I'm pretty certain some of them weren't jerks, but people making one of the most passionate pleas they knew how. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Destroying something in an act of violence is never a good way to get people to listen to you, and if that's the only way they knew to make a passionate plea they need lessons.
Look, I never think it's a good idea to use any form of destruction or defacement - I don't think burning people in effigy or scrawling graffiti across national monuments is a good idea either.
Posts: 14428 | Registered: Aug 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
Even if the flag is theirs - and I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt on that - it's still a violent act.
Posts: 26071 | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
That is the danger of making strong protests...driving people away. I myself would probably never do it, since the flag is also a symbol for my own personal patriotic feelings, but I will defend those who want to...and also understand why American citizens would burn it. What I cannot stand is seeing foreigners burning the flag because most of the time they have no idea what the USA is all about...and because their hatred of America is fueled by the lies of demagogues.
[ February 01, 2005, 06:04 PM: Message edited by: Telperion the Silver ]
Posts: 4953 | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Actually, I don't care about foreigners doing it, especially in their own country, mainly because they don't know what it's all about.
Posts: 26071 | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Here's the question, though, Dag. We agree that burning the flag is destructive, ineffective, and generally a bad way to make your point. Should it be illegal?
Posts: 894 | Registered: Apr 2000
| IP: Logged |
quote:Here's the question, though, Dag. We agree that burning the flag is destructive, ineffective, and generally a bad way to make your point. Should it be illegal?
Absolutely not.
Edit: Neutral fire codes are OK, though, as long as their not smokescreens.
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Confused]](confused.gif)
![[Evil]](graemlins/evil.gif)
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
![[Hail]](graemlins/hail.gif)
![[Frown]](frown.gif)
![[Angst]](graemlins/angst.gif)
![[Wall Bash]](graemlins/wallbash.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
