FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » Simpson's Last Night

   
Author Topic: Simpson's Last Night
sarahdipity
Member
Member # 3254

 - posted      Profile for sarahdipity   Email sarahdipity         Edit/Delete Post 
So my friends and I watched the simpson's last night. Before it started there was a warning. We can't decide if it was a joke or not. Does anyone know?

The warning said something like parental warning, this episode contains issues dealing with same-sex marriage. Or something like that.

Posts: 872 | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TomDavidson
Member
Member # 124

 - posted      Profile for TomDavidson   Email TomDavidson         Edit/Delete Post 
The show did indeed involve issues pertaining to same-sex marriage, so it probably wasn't a joke.
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
jebus202
Member
Member # 2524

 - posted      Profile for jebus202   Email jebus202         Edit/Delete Post 
Simpsons now sucks so much ass that I have no trouble believing it wasn't a joke.
Posts: 3564 | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sarahdipity
Member
Member # 3254

 - posted      Profile for sarahdipity   Email sarahdipity         Edit/Delete Post 
Well two of the guys in our group thought perhaps the warning was making fun of all the warnings people have to put up. It seems like an odd warning. I used to seeing this show may discuss adult themes or something like that. This warning was really specialized.

*shrug* I thought the show was one of the better new ones. Or, at least I giggled more than usual.

Posts: 872 | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
aspectre
Member
Member # 2222

 - posted      Profile for aspectre           Edit/Delete Post 
For the FOX network, it was probably quite serious: what with the deluge of organised hatemail likely to pour into the newly activist FederalCommunicationsCommission.

For the Simpsons, probably more like accepted cuz "its a funny lead-in for our show." When you're a billion-dollar franchise for stepping on people's foibles, ya don't really worry about the FTC. If FOX network decided to cancel out their contract, it'd just start a major bidding war by the other networks and cable&satellite channels.

Posts: 8501 | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ryuko
Member
Member # 5125

 - posted      Profile for Ryuko   Email Ryuko         Edit/Delete Post 
This thread title got my hopes up. [Frown]
Posts: 4816 | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sarahdipity
Member
Member # 3254

 - posted      Profile for sarahdipity   Email sarahdipity         Edit/Delete Post 
Why did it get your hopes up?
Posts: 872 | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ryuko
Member
Member # 5125

 - posted      Profile for Ryuko   Email Ryuko         Edit/Delete Post 
Because of the punctuation. I thought it was about The Simpsons' last night on television.
Posts: 4816 | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Synesthesia
Member
Member # 4774

 - posted      Profile for Synesthesia   Email Synesthesia         Edit/Delete Post 
That episode was pretty good, better than most of the later season Simpson's episodes.
Yet, it annoys me when they have that parental discretion disclaimer anytime there's a gay theme.
Still, it was cool when Patty came out and all. It could have been better though.

Posts: 9942 | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Joldo
Member
Member # 6991

 - posted      Profile for Joldo   Email Joldo         Edit/Delete Post 
Adam and Steve and Madam and Eve need marriage, anyways. Does them good.
Posts: 1735 | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Book
Member
Member # 5500

 - posted      Profile for Book           Edit/Delete Post 
Did anyone think that Simpsons episode was unusually bad?
Posts: 2258 | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
mackillian
Member
Member # 586

 - posted      Profile for mackillian   Email mackillian         Edit/Delete Post 
Nope.
Posts: 14745 | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Da_Goat
Member
Member # 5529

 - posted      Profile for Da_Goat           Edit/Delete Post 
I missed it. I, like, forgot it was Sunday last night.

Was there an Arrested Development on?

Posts: 2292 | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
mackillian
Member
Member # 586

 - posted      Profile for mackillian   Email mackillian         Edit/Delete Post 
No, two episodes of the Simpsons instead. Next Sunday will be an hour long episode of Arrested Development.
Posts: 14745 | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
newfoundlogic
Member
Member # 3907

 - posted      Profile for newfoundlogic   Email newfoundlogic         Edit/Delete Post 
No one seems to have considered that parental warnings are as much used to get viewers to perk up their ears as to warn parents of questionable content.
Posts: 3446 | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2