quote: Hoax Soaks Aliso Viejo City officials fall for an Internet prank and draft a law to curb the risks of dihydrogen monoxide.
By William Wan, Times Staff Writer
In large quantities, dihydrogen monoxide can cause medical problems in humans and even destroy property. But in Aliso Viejo, it's only causing red faces.
Officials of the south Orange County city were embarrassed to learn Friday that they had tripped over an Internet hoax about dihydrogen monoxide — commonly known as water — in an effort to be environmentally correct.
A proposed law that was scheduled to go before the City Council next week would have banned foam cups and containers at events requiring city permits.
A staff report cited environmental concerns, including the danger posed by dihydrogen monoxide, described as a chemical used in production of the plastic that can "threaten human health and safety."
"It's embarrassing," said City Manager David J. Norman. "We had a paralegal who did bad research."
The American Plastics Council has seized on the case as an example of how "junk science" can cause unfounded environmental fears.
"The plastics industry has always been a favorite target of environmentalists," said spokesman Robert Krebs. "But we dream about instances like this when our opponents do something foolish."
Regardless of the hoax, the Sierra Club argues that the ubiquitous white foam — made of polystyrene — can cause environmental harm.
It's not biodegradable, said spokesman Eric Antebi, and, if ingested, can damage the digestive tracts of marine animals.
Aliso Viejo officials are not the only people who have fallen for the hoax.
Seven years ago, four teenagers in Pittsburgh were reprimanded by police for passing out fliers that caused a neighborhood-wide panic about dihydrogen monoxide.
Weeks later, the hoax took on a life of its own after a junior high school student in Eagle Rock, Idaho, used it in a science fair project to prove how gullible people can be.
The student conducted a survey of residents about the dangers of dihydrogen monoxide and found that 86% favored banning the substance — without knowing what it was.
The hoax inspired a small tongue-in-cheek movement on the Internet, with "national coalitions" formed to ban the substance. One of them, the Dihydrogen Monoxide Research Division, maintains an extensive, if satirical, website detailing the harmful effects of the chemical — from tissue damage caused by prolonged exposure (wrinkly skin after soaking in the bath tub) to death by overdose (drowning).
Despite their embarrassment, officials in Aliso Viejo may still ban polystyrene.
"Our main concern is with the Aliso Creek watershed," Norman said. "If you get Styrofoam into the water and it breaks apart, it's virtually impossible to clean up."
After some Internet research on Friday, the city manager decided to pull the item from the City Council's agenda.
"We're going to rework it — with better research — before it's taken back to the council," Norman said.
posted
Mr. Funny also started a thread a little while ago on the dangers of dihydrogen monoxide. It was pretty funny. I never thought anyone would fall for it, though. I'm so naive.
Edit: oops, it wasn't a thread. It was just a mention.
quote: Quantities of dihydrogen monoxide have been found in almost every stream, lake, and reservoir in America today.
Perhaps we should be more worried about what is in the streams, lakes and reservoirs without dihydrogen monoxide.
Posts: 8473 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Actually, Penn & Teller did the dihydrogen monoxide trick on their show last year. It was hilarious - they got people at Earth Day in DC to sign a petition to ban it. Everyone signed.
One woman was especially funny. When the Penn & Teller actress (posing as an environmental activist) started to give the spiel about how dihydrogen monoxide is put in pesticides, this woman interruped her and pompously declared, "I'm familiar with it," as she signed her name on the petition.
Here's the Penn & Teller show site. The title is a cuss word, for those of you who have filters, etc.
posted
Reminds me of the petition to end women's suffrage. Lot's of people signed because they didn't want women to suffer...
Posts: 26071 | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
And, of course, this reminds us all of "Talking to Americans." Which just goes to show that if you stick a camera in people's faces and badger them they're going to say stupid things.
Posts: 3243 | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
There are multiple possible names for water. Hydrogen hydroxide is one (although that implies that it is a base -- or an acid (both of which are sometimes true)).
Posts: 32919 | Registered: Mar 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Dihydrogen monoxide is produced by the combustion of fossil fuels. I just call it burnt hydrogen. Combustion is always bad. Everyone knows that.
Posts: 3735 | Registered: Mar 2002
| IP: Logged |
I am not a chemist. I think I got a C- in chemistry. I am not interested in chemistry. I don't read books on it or look up web sites on it.
And when I read the thread title, the first thing that popped into my head was, "Wouldn't that just be water?"
It amazes me that we have so many people who are able to function at a high level in one certain area, while being totally oblivious to things outside their core competency. What happened to everyone having a solid base of information in a wide number of areas in addition to their specialization?
Posts: 5383 | Registered: Dec 1999
| IP: Logged |
posted
you really don't want the lecture on naming conventions... I'm sure I can find a link somewhere. It is in the second chapter of every basic chemistry text in existence, right after significant figures in the first chapter.
posted
Well, when I teach HS chemistry students about naming binary compounds, I tell them there are two exceptions (at least, two they have to know) to the naming rules.
Water and ammonia. Which are always called "water" and "ammonia."
quote: Some compounds have been known for so long that a systematic nomenclature cannot compete with well-established common names. Examples of compounds for which common names are used include water (H2O), ammonia (NH3)
quote: Sometimes these compounds have generic or common names (e.g., H2O is "water") and they also have systematic names (e.g., H2O, dihydrogen monoxide).
posted
Okay, ya got me curious, rivka. Why dihydrogen monoxide as a systemic name? I thought that names were chosen to be descriptive of the active groups that a molecule is composed of, decomposes into, eg: hydrogen sulfide sodium hydroxide hydrogen hydroxide The latter being water, which has a natural equilibrium state of H+ and OH- dissolved in H20 ; with the free hydrogen ion and the free hydoxyl radical being explanation for why water is also known as "the universal solvent".
Posts: 8501 | Registered: Jul 2001
| IP: Logged |
Oh, and water's polarity has far more to do with its ability to dissolve compounds than the very small concentration of hydrogen and hydroxide ions it tends to have.
Hydroxyl radicals (like all radicals) aren't stable, so I'm not sure what you're talking about there.
Posts: 32919 | Registered: Mar 2003
| IP: Logged |