FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » The Jane Austen Experiment...

   
Author Topic: The Jane Austen Experiment...
Puffy Treat
Member
Member # 7210

 - posted      Profile for Puffy Treat           Edit/Delete Post 
Would Jane be published today?
Posts: 6689 | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Javert Hugo
Member
Member # 3980

 - posted      Profile for Javert Hugo   Email Javert Hugo         Edit/Delete Post 
I don't believe him - that no one recognized it. I'll bet that just about everyone recognized it and they gave him the form letter brushoff.

I can't think of any reason it would be in the company's best interest to call him on it. They have nothing invested in him and it's the easiest to simply walk away without an explanation.

Posts: 1753 | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Puffy Treat
Member
Member # 7210

 - posted      Profile for Puffy Treat           Edit/Delete Post 
Did you read the full article? They mentioned that a few people did recognize it.
Posts: 6689 | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Javert Hugo
Member
Member # 3980

 - posted      Profile for Javert Hugo   Email Javert Hugo         Edit/Delete Post 
They mentioned that he assumed and it seemed a few people didn't recognize it. That's not the same thing at all.
Posts: 1753 | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Puffy Treat
Member
Member # 7210

 - posted      Profile for Puffy Treat           Edit/Delete Post 
They talk with those who recognized it. Scroll down a bit. [Smile]
Posts: 6689 | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Javert Hugo
Member
Member # 3980

 - posted      Profile for Javert Hugo   Email Javert Hugo         Edit/Delete Post 
Right - they didn't talk with anyone who DIDN'T recognize it.

That they talked to one who did does not mean that he was the only one.

Posts: 1753 | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Uprooted
Member
Member # 8353

 - posted      Profile for Uprooted   Email Uprooted         Edit/Delete Post 
I'm with Javert on this one--just because those who did not acknowledge his game sent a form letter doesn't mean they didn't recognize it. Which is exactly what a couple of the publishers said.

Although I much prefer the response of the one who said "check your copy of P&P, which no doubt resides in close proximity to your typewriter." (paraphrase from memory, not direct quote)

Posts: 3149 | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Icarus
Member
Member # 3162

 - posted      Profile for Icarus   Email Icarus         Edit/Delete Post 
I'm with Javert.

-o-

(And I personally think Austen is currently ridiculously overrated.)

Posts: 13680 | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Kwea
Member
Member # 2199

 - posted      Profile for Kwea   Email Kwea         Edit/Delete Post 
My wife will REALLY hate you if she hears you say that, Icky.

[Wink] [Razz]

Posts: 15082 | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TomDavidson
Member
Member # 124

 - posted      Profile for TomDavidson   Email TomDavidson         Edit/Delete Post 
I saw the title of this thread and thought someone besides me had read the new Thursday Next book.

By the way, if no one besides me has done so, you really should.

Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Tara
Member
Member # 10030

 - posted      Profile for Tara   Email Tara         Edit/Delete Post 
If I recieved a blatantly plaigarized copy of a famous book to be published, I would almost surely send back the standard rejection letter.

Giving special treatment (such a writing a special letter) to goofy people only fuels them.

MY first impression was that his guy was trying to discredit British publishing houses because they hadn't published his own book, but maybe that's just me being cynical. Still, the guy has no evidence that the publishers DIDN'T recognize Pride & Prejudice.

Posts: 930 | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Leonide
Member
Member # 4157

 - posted      Profile for Leonide   Email Leonide         Edit/Delete Post 
I had no idea it was out already, Tom!

*runs to Amazon*

I loves me some Thursday Next.

re: Jane Austen...i too think she's overrated. I have yet to read any of her books all the way through, except Persuasion, which I still didn't enjoy that much. However, I almost across-the-board enjoy the filmic adaptations of her works...so maybe i'm just missing something when I read them. *shrug*

Also, has anyone ever seen Emma Thompson's Golden Globe acceptance speech for her Sense and Sensibility screenplay? She wrote a send-up to Austen, penning the speech to resemble what Jane might have wrote were she alive today (or if we had the Golden Globes in the 19th century)

A cursory search and I can't find a link on YouTube...anyway, it's an extra on the Sense and Sensibility dvd, if anyone can get their hands on that...pretty amusing [Smile]

Posts: 3516 | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Belle
Member
Member # 2314

 - posted      Profile for Belle   Email Belle         Edit/Delete Post 
The thing is, I don't think proving Austen wouldn't get published today (and I agree, he did NOT prove that) would be an insult to Austen. Lots of great writers wouldn't get published today, and it doesn't diminish how great they are. Shakespeare wouldn't sell his plays today, not in iambic pentameter with English vernacular that his audience understood perfectly but we must use historical volumes to help figure out.

The plots would sell today, but they'd have to be written to appeal to today's audience. That's no slam on the Bard, or on Austen, just a fact. And again, does not diminish how wonderful they are, just reflects and understanding that times change and publishers look for different things.

[heresy]I daresay that in 100 years, no one would publish Harry Potter in the form we know today. Things will undoutedly be very different yet again.[/heresy]

Posts: 14428 | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2