FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » Alan Moore's smut.

   
Author Topic: Alan Moore's smut.
Joldo
Member
Member # 6991

 - posted      Profile for Joldo   Email Joldo         Edit/Delete Post 
I'm looking at Lost Girls on Amazon. For those who don't know, it's a comic book by the phenomenal Alan Moore. And it's porn, or at least erotica, irredeemably and unabashedly. Moore says his purposes were to show that pornography can be high quality, to protest the coprous waste that actually makes up porn today, and as a response to violent comics--the defense that violence is an essential part of humanity, and therefore graphic violence can be used for deeper artistic purposes should be as applicable to graphic sexuality in art.

It's very very expensive, and it is smut. I'm not sure about ordering it. I'm wondering if anyone on Hatrack has read it, and if it's worth the money. And if it will seriously creep out my roommates when they browse my bookshelves.

Also, discussion question: when they inevitably butcher the feature film, how do you think Moore will respond? [Wink]

Posts: 1735 | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Destineer
Member
Member # 821

 - posted      Profile for Destineer           Edit/Delete Post 
Never read it. Gaiman's review on Amazon makes it sound extremely interesting.
Posts: 4600 | Registered: Mar 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Joldo
Member
Member # 6991

 - posted      Profile for Joldo   Email Joldo         Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, but Gaiman (bless his heart) is Alan Moore's monkeyboy go-for, so I can't really trust it.
Posts: 1735 | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TL
Member
Member # 8124

 - posted      Profile for TL   Email TL         Edit/Delete Post 
As smut goes, it's rather boring. I have a copy, and I pretty much regret having bought it. Always remember: even the best writers, at times, go tragically wrong. I don't object to Moore's goals, I just don't think he pulled it off. The art, I really disliked. I found it pale, and fleshtoned, and flavorless. This is the tapwater of erotica.

If you're a huge fan of Moore, and you want to own his stuff, okay, get a copy. If you're interested in the content, you take your chances. I'd rather I spent the money on another Luis Royo book, personally.

Posts: 2267 | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TomDavidson
Member
Member # 124

 - posted      Profile for TomDavidson   Email TomDavidson         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Always remember: even the best writers, at times, go tragically wrong.
I think an important lesson is this: if a writer you like has a pet theme, never buy a book that openly and obviously addresses that theme. It will always be self-indulgent.
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Glenn Arnold
Member
Member # 3192

 - posted      Profile for Glenn Arnold   Email Glenn Arnold         Edit/Delete Post 
That's a bit absolute isn't it Tom? I think it's possible that sometimes a writer's muse is his pet theme. And there are some self indulgent works that are extremely good. Fred Exley's "A Fan's Notes" comes to mind.
Posts: 3735 | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2