posted
I'm thinking of going to a friend's house there's just the two of us, I'm thinking we could play some D&D once we got bored of games and I'm wondering can a campaign with 1 DM and 1 PC 'work'?
IP: Logged |
posted
it all depends on the type of DM and player you have. If you have a very storytelling/problemsolving-intensive DM and only 1-2 players that can be quite difficult (often the players won't get what the DM is trying to lead them to and everyone just gets frustrated).
If you have a more hack-and-slash DM, then it should work fine, but just keep in mind that it's liable to be a far more boring experience than your typical game.
Posts: 1038 | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I completely disagree with TheGrimace. I spent many years playing in and running 1-on-1 games with a close friend, when we had no group to game with. Regardless of the story-telling/fighting balance, it can work out just fine and be incredibly fun.
Posts: 3580 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
Blayne Bradley
unregistered
posted
Another question, I notice that the stats for Quarterstaff is 1d6/1d6 does this mean it has two attacks?
IP: Logged |
posted
Back in my day the weapons could do different damage depending on the size of the target. It was often written that way, 1dX/1dY, where the X die would be for the small monsters and the Y die would be for the large ones.
For instance - and this is really tugging on the memory - a dagger was 1d4/1d3.
You're probably playing a way more modern version of D&D than I used to, but it's fun to dig up those memories. Posts: 158 | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
To elaborate on Tom's point, Blayne: As a double weapon, the quarterstaff can be used for two attacks following the Two Weapon Fighting rules.
Posts: 3580 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Wave]](graemlins/wave.gif)
