FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » The antisemitic roots of current anti-Israel criticism (Page 1)

  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: The antisemitic roots of current anti-Israel criticism
Lisa
Member
Member # 8384

 - posted      Profile for Lisa   Email Lisa         Edit/Delete Post 
Link
Posts: 12266 | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
rivka
Member
Member # 4859

 - posted      Profile for rivka   Email rivka         Edit/Delete Post 
Rabbi Hier is great. How'd that end up in the WSJ of all places, though?
Posts: 32919 | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lisa
Member
Member # 8384

 - posted      Profile for Lisa   Email Lisa         Edit/Delete Post 
I don't know. Someone I'm friends with on Facebook had posted it to her profile, or I never would have seen it.

He really cut right to the chase, though. I get that not all criticism of Israel is antisemitic, but the insanity that's going on right now is simply not explainable as anything but an antisemitic double standard.

Posts: 12266 | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kmbboots
Member
Member # 8576

 - posted      Profile for kmbboots   Email kmbboots         Edit/Delete Post 
That is fascinating.
Posts: 11187 | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
The Rabbit
Member
Member # 671

 - posted      Profile for The Rabbit   Email The Rabbit         Edit/Delete Post 
It couldn't possibly that people are critical of Israel because they can count and don't think that Hamas killing a dozen people over the past 4 years with rockets justifies Israel killing over 500 Palestinians. It has to be that we are irrational anti-Semites.
Posts: 12591 | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
rivka
Member
Member # 4859

 - posted      Profile for rivka   Email rivka         Edit/Delete Post 
Did you read the article, Rabbit? It doesn't seem like you did -- you're reacting to the thread title, not the specific claims in the article.

Your skewed view of the situation is another story altogether.

Posts: 32919 | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
twinky
Member
Member # 693

 - posted      Profile for twinky   Email twinky         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Just look at the spate of attacks this week on Jews and Jewish institutions around the world: a car ramming into a synagogue in France; a Chabad menorah and Jewish-owned shops sprayed with swastikas in Belgium; a banner at an Australian rally demanding "clean the earth from dirty Zionists!"; demonstrators in the Netherlands chanting "Gas the Jews"; and in Florida, protestors demanding Jews "Go back to the ovens!"
This makes me sad. I wish this sort of thing didn't come along with the protests.

I'm not going to comment on the rest of the piece beyond noting that I don't agree with a fair amount of it.

Posts: 10886 | Registered: Feb 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lisa
Member
Member # 8384

 - posted      Profile for Lisa   Email Lisa         Edit/Delete Post 
500 Arabs get killed by Israel while Israel attempts to protect itself and the world goes berserk. The Arabs kill thousands of their own for reasons far less pure, and the world is silent.

Rabbit, you say 12 is nothing compared to 500. Well, 500 is nothing compared to the thousands of Arab-inflicted casualties.

Posts: 12266 | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kmbboots
Member
Member # 8576

 - posted      Profile for kmbboots   Email kmbboots         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by rivka:
Did you read the article, Rabbit? It doesn't seem like you did -- you're reacting to the thread title, not the specific claims in the article.


The Rabbit didn't choose the thread title.
Posts: 11187 | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
The Rabbit
Member
Member # 671

 - posted      Profile for The Rabbit   Email The Rabbit         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by rivka:
Did you read the article, Rabbit? It doesn't seem like you did.

Your skewed view of the situation is another story altogether.

Yes I did read the article and I think that in many places Rabbi Heir is seeing only what he wants to see. He is equating things that simply aren't equal.

I will agree that having rockets fired on your cities is terrible and that the international community should have spoken up on it. But thousands of people not being able to sleep at night because they are afraid rockets might hit simply isn't the same as thousands of people injured in hospitals, homeless, without food and shelter. To say that making a big fuss about the later than the former represents a double standard is stretching the truth. I am not anti-Israel, in fact I have always been an Israel supporter and have visited the country several times. I think that Israel not only has a right to exist but a right to safety and security.

But I do think that Israel's treatment of the Palestinians who live in Gaza is inhumane, disproportionate and unjustified by the threat that Hamas rockets pose to Israel. I think Israel's leaders have chosen a coarse of actions that is not only unethical but will also fail in the long run Israels. This disproportionate response in Gaza is more likely to degrade Israeli security than improve it. Any security solution for Israel that does provide a just and humane solution for the Palestinians will not be succeed.

I also suspect that some of the opposition to Israel is in fact rooted in anti-Semitism but I think assigning the majority of the opposition to that motivation is as ill founded as those who claim Israel is bombing Gaza because they hate Muslims or think Palestinians don't have souls.

Posts: 12591 | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
natural_mystic
Member
Member # 11760

 - posted      Profile for natural_mystic           Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by twinky:
quote:
Just look at the spate of attacks this week on Jews and Jewish institutions around the world: a car ramming into a synagogue in France; a Chabad menorah and Jewish-owned shops sprayed with swastikas in Belgium; a banner at an Australian rally demanding "clean the earth from dirty Zionists!"; demonstrators in the Netherlands chanting "Gas the Jews"; and in Florida, protestors demanding Jews "Go back to the ovens!"
This makes me sad. I wish this sort of thing didn't come along with the protests.


Seconded.

Two other relatively recent cases that drew world wide protests were the Tibet protests leading up to the Olympics, and the protests around the invasion of Iraq. I know the Chinese felt extremely victimized by the former; although I'm not sure that the US much cared about the latter.

Are the current protests substantially different in mood or magnitude than these other cases? - this is not a loaded question; I genuinely don't know.

Finally, is it a surprising double standard that the world expects more from a first world country with a fully fledged democracy and one of the most educated populations in the world, than from the thuggish Hamas?

Posts: 644 | Registered: Sep 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
The Rabbit
Member
Member # 671

 - posted      Profile for The Rabbit   Email The Rabbit         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Lisa:
500 Arabs get killed by Israel while Israel attempts to protect itself and the world goes berserk. The Arabs kill thousands of their own for reasons far less pure, and the world is silent.

Rabbit, you say 12 is nothing compared to 500. Well, 500 is nothing compared to the thousands of Arab-inflicted casualties.

You are right Lisa, I do hold Jews to a higher standard. What do you expect when you claim that you are the people chosen by God to teach us what he expects. I expect a people who have experienced what the Jews have through history to have more compassion and understanding for other displaced and suffering people. And in fact many of the Jews I know live up to that expectation, some of them are even more appalled by Israel's current actions than I am.
Posts: 12591 | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
The Rabbit
Member
Member # 671

 - posted      Profile for The Rabbit   Email The Rabbit         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by twinky:
quote:
Just look at the spate of attacks this week on Jews and Jewish institutions around the world: a car ramming into a synagogue in France; a Chabad menorah and Jewish-owned shops sprayed with swastikas in Belgium; a banner at an Australian rally demanding "clean the earth from dirty Zionists!"; demonstrators in the Netherlands chanting "Gas the Jews"; and in Florida, protestors demanding Jews "Go back to the ovens!"
This makes me sad. I wish this sort of thing didn't come along with the protests.

I'm not going to comment on the rest of the piece beyond noting that I don't agree with a fair amount of it.

It saddens me as well. I put it in the same category as the attacks against Muslims in the US that happened following 9/11. One of my students was beaten up walking home from the week after 9/11 for looking Muslim.

Shortly there after another student of mine was saying his evening prayers on the lawn outside the Engineering building. The next day when I was in my office I asked him if he had had in problems since the attacks. He said a few people had yelled things but that many others were very supportive. He said he understood that those who were responding with violence and hatred were a small minority just like terrorists are a tiny minority of the billion Muslims in the world. I wish there were more people like him.

Anti-Semitism like all prejudices continues because people see others as mono-lithic groups, if a few persons in the group do something bad -- it is presumed the whole groups must do similar things. If a one person in the group has committed an atrocity, the whole group deserves punishment for it. If people are serious about trying to eliminate anti-semitism, that mentality has to be fought even when the groups being stereotyped are anti-Israel.

Posts: 12591 | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Orincoro
Member
Member # 8854

 - posted      Profile for Orincoro   Email Orincoro         Edit/Delete Post 
Does being disgusted with both sides qualify me as anti-Semitic? I have yet to be particularly impressed by the positions of either. It would be enough at this point for either to convince me that they are at least really hoping for peace (and not just the lack of violence, you understand, but peace). Somehow though, I think the attraction of violence and reprisal is going to keep things going for another, oh, 4 thousand years or so.
Posts: 9912 | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ricree101
Member
Member # 7749

 - posted      Profile for ricree101   Email ricree101         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
It couldn't possibly that people are critical of Israel because they can count and don't think that Hamas killing a dozen people over the past 4 years with rockets justifies Israel killing over 500 Palestinians. It has to be that we are irrational anti-Semites.

I'm not really familiar enough with the situation there to know the truth of his claims, but I do think that it would be more convincing if you had addressed his direct rebuttal to this argument.

quote:
Many people ask why there are so few Israeli casualties in comparison with the Palestinian death toll. It's because Israel's first priority is the safety of its citizens, which is why there are shelters and warning systems in Israeli towns. If Hamas can dig tunnels, it can certainly build shelters. Instead, it prefers to use women and children as human shields while its leaders rush into hiding.

Posts: 2437 | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
natural_mystic
Member
Member # 11760

 - posted      Profile for natural_mystic           Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by ricree101:
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
It couldn't possibly that people are critical of Israel because they can count and don't think that Hamas killing a dozen people over the past 4 years with rockets justifies Israel killing over 500 Palestinians. It has to be that we are irrational anti-Semites.

I'm not really familiar enough with the situation there to know the truth of his claims, but I do think that it would be more convincing if you had addressed his direct rebuttal to this argument.

quote:
Many people ask why there are so few Israeli casualties in comparison with the Palestinian death toll. It's because Israel's first priority is the safety of its citizens, which is why there are shelters and warning systems in Israeli towns. If Hamas can dig tunnels, it can certainly build shelters. Instead, it prefers to use women and children as human shields while its leaders rush into hiding.

This shows that Hamas is bad, not that Palestinian fatalities don't matter.
Posts: 644 | Registered: Sep 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
The Rabbit
Member
Member # 671

 - posted      Profile for The Rabbit   Email The Rabbit         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Many people ask why there are so few Israeli casualties in comparison with the Palestinian death toll. It's because Israel's first priority is the safety of its citizens, which is why there are shelters and warning systems in Israeli towns. If Hamas can dig tunnels, it can certainly build shelters. Instead, it prefers to use women and children as human shields while its leaders rush into hiding.
This is a gross simplification of the situation and smacks of blame the victim. I'd also like to see some data to back it up but I can't find anywhere that is comparing the amount of collateral damage on both sides. And comparing the numbers in monetary terms wouldn't be quite fair since homes and Businesses in the Israeli area are more expensive. I'd like to see numbers that compare the number of homes, businesses, schools, roads, government buildings and so so forth that have been destroyed. If the numbers are comparable on both sides then Rabbi Heir may have a valid point but until there are numbers to back it up its just speculation.

Even if the collateral damage numbers are similar, it isn't fair to claim that Israel is better able to protect its civilians because it cares more about them. Gaza simply does not have the infrastructure that Israel has. Israel is a fully developed country with infrastructure and a strong well organized army. if Gaza were a country, it would be very low on the development scale and one which has been under siege for most of its existence. This is a true David and Golliath situation only this time, Golliath is on the Jewish side, David is the Philistine and David is loosing.

[ January 09, 2009, 05:57 PM: Message edited by: The Rabbit ]

Posts: 12591 | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sarcasticmuppet
Member
Member # 5035

 - posted      Profile for sarcasticmuppet   Email sarcasticmuppet         Edit/Delete Post 
loosing what? [Wink]
Posts: 4089 | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
rivka
Member
Member # 4859

 - posted      Profile for rivka   Email rivka         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by kmbboots:
quote:
Originally posted by rivka:
Did you read the article, Rabbit? It doesn't seem like you did -- you're reacting to the thread title, not the specific claims in the article.


The Rabbit didn't choose the thread title.
Hence the word reacting.
Posts: 32919 | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
The Rabbit
Member
Member # 671

 - posted      Profile for The Rabbit   Email The Rabbit         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by sarcasticmuppet:
loosing what? [Wink]

The fight? Lives? Property? Control over their territory? You name it, right now (at least for the short term perspective), Gaza is loosing this fight pretty decisively.
Posts: 12591 | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
rivka
Member
Member # 4859

 - posted      Profile for rivka   Email rivka         Edit/Delete Post 
Rabbit, the word you want is "losing".
Posts: 32919 | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Speed
Member
Member # 5162

 - posted      Profile for Speed   Email Speed         Edit/Delete Post 
Or loosing the dogs on those damn kids that won't get off their lawn.
Posts: 2804 | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
The Rabbit
Member
Member # 671

 - posted      Profile for The Rabbit   Email The Rabbit         Edit/Delete Post 
Ah yes!
Posts: 12591 | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
The Rabbit
Member
Member # 671

 - posted      Profile for The Rabbit   Email The Rabbit         Edit/Delete Post 
Ah yes! Don't you that is my signature error?
Posts: 12591 | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Speed
Member
Member # 5162

 - posted      Profile for Speed   Email Speed         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by The Rabbit:
Ah yes! Don't you that is my signature error?

What, omitting the word "know?" [Wink]
Posts: 2804 | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Speed
Member
Member # 5162

 - posted      Profile for Speed   Email Speed         Edit/Delete Post 
By the way, all you people who think there's anything wrong with Rabbit's spelling, grammar or syntax are only demonstrating your rabid anti-leporiditism.
Posts: 2804 | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ricree101
Member
Member # 7749

 - posted      Profile for ricree101   Email ricree101         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by natural_mystic:
This shows that Hamas is bad, not that Palestinian fatalities don't matter.

Rabbit's argument (as I understood it) was that Israel had earned criticism because of the disparity in casualties between the two sides. I think that the article's author raised a good argument. If one side has taken great pains to shelter and protect their civilians, and the other side has made an effort to put their own into harm's way, then it is not necessarily unreasonable or disproportionate if one side has greater casualties than the other.
Posts: 2437 | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kmbboots
Member
Member # 8576

 - posted      Profile for kmbboots   Email kmbboots         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by rivka:
quote:
Originally posted by kmbboots:
quote:
Originally posted by rivka:
Did you read the article, Rabbit? It doesn't seem like you did -- you're reacting to the thread title, not the specific claims in the article.


The Rabbit didn't choose the thread title.
Hence the word reacting.
Well why wouldn't she react to the thread title. Presumably, it was chosen to evoke a reaction. The title is part of the message that the OP was trying to convey, wasn't it? Or are we to ignore the implication that the whole reason everyone is so mean to Israel is because the whole world hates Jews and that perhaps if a chunk of Palestine had been given to Baptists, everything would be sunshine and flowers.

It is a very bad thing that the protests are degenerating into anti-semitism, but that is the branches of the tree, not the roots.

Posts: 11187 | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Samprimary
Member
Member # 8561

 - posted      Profile for Samprimary   Email Samprimary         Edit/Delete Post 
it's only impossible to explain the current situation as anything other than an anti-semitic double standard if one is actively looking only to explain the current situation as the result of an anti-semitic double standard, to the purposeful exclusion of any other possible factor.
Posts: 15421 | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
rivka
Member
Member # 4859

 - posted      Profile for rivka   Email rivka         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by kmbboots:
that is the branches of the tree, not the roots.

I believe that is the crux of the disagreement.

And I never said anyone should or should not react to anything. I am rather confused as to why you think I did. I do think reacting solely to the title of a thread and ignoring the OP's content or that of linked articles is fairly silly. But silliness is certainly permitted. [Wink]

Posts: 32919 | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
The Rabbit
Member
Member # 671

 - posted      Profile for The Rabbit   Email The Rabbit         Edit/Delete Post 
I will gladly admit that my reading of the article was colored by Lisa's choice of thread title. I'm fairly confident that is what Lisa intended in choosing that title. I also think Lisa's response to Heir's article, as captured in the thread title, is not irrational and probably intended by the author even though he is much more subtle and persuasive than Lisa. That may be an unfair judgement of Heir and if so I owe him an apology.

I'm am very disappointed that people are responding to the current crisis by striking out of against Jews and find the revival of anti-Semitism saddening. I do however think it is dangerous of Israel and Jews to presume that this is the root of peoples objection to Israeli actions. I can guarantee you that I would feel even stronger opposition if an LDS country were bombing and killing and hundreds of Palestinians.

Posts: 12591 | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Mucus
Member
Member # 9735

 - posted      Profile for Mucus           Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by natural_mystic:
... Two other relatively recent cases that drew world wide protests were the Tibet protests leading up to the Olympics, and the protests around the invasion of Iraq. I know the Chinese felt extremely victimized by the former; although I'm not sure that the US much cared about the latter.

Are the current protests substantially different in mood or magnitude than these other cases? - this is not a loaded question; I genuinely don't know.

Hmmm, the media coverage of the Tibet protests was at the beginning significantly more biased than that of Gaza. Of course, the the Gaza situation is much more predictable than the Tibet one. The Tibet situation was initially reported as almost a second Tiananmen Square and it took until the first Westerners to report from out of Tibet before they realised that they had simply cocked up and to change the reporting accordingly.

Afterwards, I would say that media coverage was predictably biased but not out of what would normally be expected. After all, both the Palestinian and Israeli communities have large and influential groups of sympathizers here whereas Chinese Americans are notoriously unpolitical and the Free Tibet people are simply silly.

Personally, I think what the comparison shows is that as far as incidents on the street, I think there is a far larger and more violent anti-semitic population that is engaged in these protests than with the other protests. This is pretty horrific.

However, as far as the media is concerned, I don't buy it. Especially where the American media is concerned, there are certainly many more hawkish pro-invasion voices. If the American media is biased against Israel then it must be amazingly biased against China. In reality, I'd probably say not biased and moderately biased respectively.

Posts: 7593 | Registered: Sep 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Mucus
Member
Member # 9735

 - posted      Profile for Mucus           Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by kmbboots:
... Or are we to ignore the implication that the whole reason everyone is so mean to Israel is because the whole world hates Jews and that perhaps if a chunk of Palestine had been given to Baptists, everything would be sunshine and flowers.

A fairly simple experiment would be to simply move from watching news coverage of Israel and Gaza from sources with multiple conflicts of interest to those without.

For example, if the American media has a history of being anti-semitic, simply watch some news from India, China, Hong Kong, or Japan and see if there is any disparity, whether they are more or less approving of the invasion.

I don't actually know the answer to this. I should check out some TVB tonight.

Posts: 7593 | Registered: Sep 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Boris
Member
Member # 6935

 - posted      Profile for Boris   Email Boris         Edit/Delete Post 
I just have to know...For those who think the response is out of proportion...What should Israel have done instead?
Posts: 3003 | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
The Rabbit
Member
Member # 671

 - posted      Profile for The Rabbit   Email The Rabbit         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Boris:
I just have to know...For those who think the response is out of proportion...What should Israel have done instead?

The missile attacks prior to this current assault were provoked by an Israel embargo and blockade of Gaza. What do you think Gaza should have done about the blockade that was devastating their economy and causing shortages of essential goods?

I will agree that there isn't a simple answer to that question but neither side is fighting without provocation. This fight has been going on long enough that both sides can legitimately believe the other side started it. Responding by escalating the violence (which is what both sides are doing) just exacerbates the problem.

What is needed is real peace talks that recognize both legitimate Palestinian claims and the right of Israel to exist. I've been studying this conflict for sometime and it still astounds me how desperately differently the two sides view the "facts" of the issues. Its very very difficult to tell where the truth actually lies. Both sides have built up an enormous mythology about the 1948 war and the 1967 war that makes it very very difficult to understand objectively what happened. I think that someone needs to broker an objective resolution of some of these factual issues so that both sides can begin to believe in the same "reality" of their shared history.

Posts: 12591 | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Teshi
Member
Member # 5024

 - posted      Profile for Teshi   Email Teshi         Edit/Delete Post 
This (the extended conflict, not only this little part of it) is one of the more ludicrous wars in Earth's history.

As much as I would like to bang certain groups' heads against the wall, I don't think that it is possible to untangle the mess in any rational sense.

I don't think Israel is responding to rocket attacks, or really responding at all to attacks.

What Israel is doing is doing an all-or-nothing attack. They knew that going in they were going to kill many civilians, and to raise the ire of the world, but I think the ultimate goal is to finish "it" once and for all. That's why they're ignoring the UN, ignoring everything. They've got a plan and they're going to finish the plan no matter what anyone else says.

Now, I don't think they're thinking entirely straight. I don't think that scouring out Hamas even to the very roots will prevent the inevitable anger from continuing to fester. I don't think that whoever made the decision really thought what civilian casualties look like in real life. I think that Israel still deeply believes that certain bits of land are "theirs" and even if they've politically relinquished control there's a sense of "that's ours" lingering, so they regard everything there- even people- as a kind of property. I think these various conceptions ("If we succeed it will be worth it.") enable them to make this kind of invasion and believe they can get away with it.

I think that doing the reverse would have been more effective (e.g. flooding the area with help, removing blockades, building schools and hospitals etc.). Undermining Hamas control simply by slowly eroding the need for an angry leadership at all would have more lasting success, I think.

Posts: 8473 | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Paul Goldner
Member
Member # 1910

 - posted      Profile for Paul Goldner   Email Paul Goldner         Edit/Delete Post 
I tend to agree with you on that last point Teshi. That said, if Israel can do some serious military damage to Hamas, then withdraws and lifts the blockade... this might work.
Posts: 4112 | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
The Rabbit
Member
Member # 671

 - posted      Profile for The Rabbit   Email The Rabbit         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Boris:
I just have to know...For those who think the response is out of proportion...What should Israel have done instead?

Jimmy Carter suggests an answer to this question in the article An Unnecessary War. Its one of the most fair and balanced things I've read and is definitely worth reading if you want to understand what's been happening on both sides.

Here are a few excerpts discussing the conditions prior to last June's cease fire agreement.

quote:
After visiting Sderot last April and seeing the serious psychological damage caused by the rockets that had fallen in that area, my wife, Rosalynn, and I declared their launching from Gaza to be inexcusable and an act of terrorism. Although casualties were rare (three deaths in seven years), the town was traumatized by the unpredictable explosions. About 3,000 residents had moved to other communities, and the streets, playgrounds and shopping centers were almost empty.
quote:
. . . the 1.5 million inhabitants of Gaza were being starved, as the U.N. special rapporteur on the right to food had found that acute malnutrition in Gaza was on the same scale as in the poorest nations in the southern Sahara, with more than half of all Palestinian families eating only one meal a day.

Palestinian leaders from Gaza were noncommittal on all issues, claiming that rockets were the only way to respond to their imprisonment and to dramatize their humanitarian plight.

quote:
On another visit to Syria in mid-December, I made an effort for the impending six-month deadline to be extended. It was clear that the preeminent issue was opening the crossings into Gaza. Representatives from the Carter Center visited Jerusalem, met with Israeli officials and asked if this was possible in exchange for a cessation of rocket fire. The Israeli government informally proposed that 15 percent of normal supplies might be possible if Hamas first stopped all rocket fire for 48 hours.

Posts: 12591 | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TL
Member
Member # 8124

 - posted      Profile for TL   Email TL         Edit/Delete Post 
Israel has a right to exist. It has a duty to defend itself. They have, over the many years, shown more humanity and patience in dealing with their enemies than any other nation on earth ever has before. They are dealing with an enemy whose stated purpose is to destroy Israel, who breaks every agreement, who disregards the safety of its own people, who engages in (and pioneered) the tactics of terrorism. Their goal is to kill innocent civilians; there is not even the subterfuge of legitimacy in their actions. Of course the death toll is disproportionate. This is an enemy which has long been known for using its civilians as shields for the sole purpose of being able to claim that Israel is killing its innocents. Against an organized military force attempting to root them out, of course the death toll is disproportionate.

What is the alternative? To go on forever without ever asserting a defense would be for Israel to doom itself. It can't reasonably do that. Is the current offensive and overreaction? I don't know. But when you're dealing with two sides -- one who wants to live in peace (as I believe Israel does) but is faced with constant attacks from the other side -- an enemy whose stated purpose is to destroy the other... I tend to take the side of the nation which wants peace.

Posts: 2267 | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Humean316
Member
Member # 8175

 - posted      Profile for Humean316   Email Humean316         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Israel has a right to exist.
What makes you think that's true?
Posts: 457 | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TL
Member
Member # 8124

 - posted      Profile for TL   Email TL         Edit/Delete Post 
It's self-evident.
Posts: 2267 | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Paul Goldner
Member
Member # 1910

 - posted      Profile for Paul Goldner   Email Paul Goldner         Edit/Delete Post 
Do you disagree with the statement?
Posts: 4112 | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Humean316
Member
Member # 8175

 - posted      Profile for Humean316   Email Humean316         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Do you disagree with the statement?
I don't think any nation has a "right" to exist because of what that word implies about the human condition. However, with Israel it is different. I think the major road-block to peace in the Middle East is the outside world, as I posted before, but I also think that the one thing that Israel must recognize is there is a difference between forcing Middle Eastern nations to recognize it's existence and forcing Middle Eastern nations to recognize it's "right" to exist. By forcing the latter, Israel would basically force the Palestinians, the Middle East, and the rest of the world to accept that the root cause of the problem was the Palestinians, and that Israel's right to exist makes what happened to the Palestinians in 1947 morally righteous.

Edit: Read this

Posts: 457 | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TL
Member
Member # 8124

 - posted      Profile for TL   Email TL         Edit/Delete Post 
Great article Humean316. Yassir Arafat went too far in his support of the Israelis.

Yeah.... I'm gonna stop reading the article now.

Posts: 2267 | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Humean316
Member
Member # 8175

 - posted      Profile for Humean316   Email Humean316         Edit/Delete Post 
London Protests

You know what I think TL? I think there are extremes on both sides, and as usual, the truth lies somewhere in the middle. Of course, we are never going to solve those problems if people stop reading articles because they disagree with whats argued.

Instead, what we will get are protests like the ones above. On both sides. And nothing will ever get done...

Posts: 457 | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TL
Member
Member # 8124

 - posted      Profile for TL   Email TL         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Of course, we are never going to solve those problems if people stop reading articles because they disagree with whats argued.
That is absolutely nonsensical. Choosing to read or not to read a particular piece of propaganda -- on either side of the argument -- has no bearing on the eventual solving the problem.

Out of curiosity, what were you attempting to communicate with the link to the article about the London Protests?

Edit: Oh, I see that you were saying that people choosing not to read particular pieces of propaganda to which they are linked are the cause of such protests.

...Um, I'm gonna have to disagree with you there.

I get what you're trying to suggest -- which is that people who refuse to hear both sides of the argument are not doing their due diligence. And that their being closed to the position of opposing ideas only leads to insular defensive thinking, which leads to the vilification of the other side.

In general, you may be right. Certainly you can't paint everyone who picks a side with that brush, and of course your position doesn't account for actual rightness.

Every time there is a conflict, the truth does not always rest in the middle. Sometimes one party actually is in the right.

In terms of not giving the propaganda of one side or the other fair shrift, I can only shrug.

Posts: 2267 | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Humean316
Member
Member # 8175

 - posted      Profile for Humean316   Email Humean316         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
In terms of not giving the propaganda of one side or the other fair shrift, I can only shrug.
My point certainly entails the notion that we must listen to both sides, but it also wonders how you know that the article I linked too is propaganda in the first place.
Posts: 457 | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TL
Member
Member # 8124

 - posted      Profile for TL   Email TL         Edit/Delete Post 
I read it. What is this? Are you insane?
Posts: 2267 | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Humean316
Member
Member # 8175

 - posted      Profile for Humean316   Email Humean316         Edit/Delete Post 
I thought you stopped when you read about Arafat? You didn't read it, you read 1/3 of it.

But that's not my point. You used the term propaganda to dismiss the argument presented in the article concerning Israel's "right" to exist, your answer to my post about Israel's "right" to exist was to stop reading the article and later call it propaganda, and thus, I wonder whether simply dismissing arguments is part of an overall dogmatism and absolutism that fails to get to the heart of the issue.

I would hope that's not an insane view...

Posts: 457 | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
The Rabbit
Member
Member # 671

 - posted      Profile for The Rabbit   Email The Rabbit         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by TL:
Israel has a right to exist. It has a duty to defend itself.

Israel has a right to exist but it has no right to seize the property and territory that rightful belongs to Palestinians. It has no right to deprive Palestinians of their basic human rights. The Palestinians also have a right to defend themselves and seek restitution for damages that have been done -- something which Israel has denied them for decades.

quote:
They have, over the many years, shown more humanity and patience in dealing with their enemies than any other nation on earth ever has before.
This is at a minimum debatable. I do not know of any other country which in modern times has stolen land from a people, denied their every effort to be compensated for that theft and punished every attempt to seek redress of grievances. I can not think of a situation in the past century that is remotely comparable.

quote:
They are dealing with an enemy whose stated purpose is to destroy Israel, who breaks every agreement, who disregards the safety of its own people, who engages in (and pioneered) the tactics of terrorism.
They are dealing with 4 million refugees, at least some of whom were driven from their homes at the point of Israeli guns. Many of those people have a stated purpose of destroying Israel but many others simply want safety, security and human dignity that is being denied them.

The Palestinians aren't the only ones who've broken every agreement. The Oslo accords broke down in part because Israel broke agreements to stop building new settlements in the West Bank and Gaza. Israel broke the most recent cease fire agreement last November and has never kept the promise open border crossings to humanitarian supplies.

quote:
Their goal is to kill innocent civilians; there is not even the subterfuge of legitimacy in their actions.
Did you read the article by Jimmy Carter. There goal isn't to kill innocent civilians, it is to pursuade Israel to open the border crossing so that people can get food.

quote:
Of course the death toll is disproportionate. This is an enemy which has long been known for using its civilians as shields for the sole purpose of being able to claim that Israel is killing its innocents. Against an organized military force attempting to root them out, of course the death toll is disproportionate.
The Gaza strip is one of the most densely populated areas of the world with over 12 times the population density of Israel and nearly as densely populated as the city of Hong Kong. Border closures prevent them from fleeing the area. Where exactly do you expect them to take refuge?

Israeli targets have included government buildings, the homes of government officials even a UN school. I suspect some of the Israeli homes that were hit were also the homes of soldiers.

This is one of the oldest tactics in the world -- our enemies don't care about human life the way we do. BS.

quote:
What is the alternative? To go on forever without ever asserting a defense would be for Israel to doom itself. It can't reasonably do that.
Carter suggested a very reasonable alternative. Open the borders to allow humanitarian supplies at levels comparable to those that existed in 2005 (700 trucks a day) in exchange for a cease fire.

Turn the question around. According to UN reports, Gaza suffers from malnutrition as severe as the poorest countries in Africa. Half of all Palestinian families in Gaza have only one meal a day. They agreed to a 6 month cease fire in exchange for opening the borders to humanitarian supplies but the Israelis did not follow through on their end. They never allowed in more the 20% of what existed in 2005 before the Israeli withdrawal.

What is their alternative? To go on forever without adequate food and medicine. They can't reasonably do that.


quote:
Is the current offensive and overreaction? I don't know. But when you're dealing with two sides -- one who wants to live in peace (as I believe Israel does) but is faced with constant attacks from the other side -- an enemy whose stated purpose is to destroy the other... I tend to take the side of the nation which wants peace. [/qb]
The way I see it, we are dealing with two sides both of whom have legitimate grievances and reasons for fighting. Many on both sides refuse to recognize the humanity of their enemies and the legitimacy of the grievances of the other side.

By labeling all Palestinians irrational terrorists, Israel has found away to justify the unjustifiable -- refusal to talk with your enemies and seek a diplomatic solution. Until Israel is will admit that the Palestinians are not solely motivated by irrational anti-semitism but do in fact have legitimate grievances which must be redressed in order to establish peace -- peace will be impossible.

Posts: 12591 | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2