Watch that first! If you're overseas or it doesn't work for some reason, try using a proxy.
Next, news commentary!
For those who don't recall, this is the woman who was drugged, raped repeatedly, severely injured (disfigured, torn pectoral muscles, bruises, and lacerations to her private parts), left locked inside a shipping container, and then, upon having a rape kit gathered by an Army doctor, had said rape kit confiscated (along with her medical records) by Halliburton, all of which proceeded to "disappear."
Is there any legitimate reason anyone can think of for saying it's not ok to state the government won't work with companies that don't allow their employees to sue in cases of sexual assault, like the KBR gang rape that prompted this amendment?
Posts: 15421 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Honestly, if Congress can get its collective undies in a twist about giving money to ACORN because some idiot employees stupidly overstepped their bounds to give assistance to fake hookers, I don't see why they can't get at least as bunched up about federal funds for companies whose employees commit this kind of act.
Posts: 11187 | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic
