posted
I see nothing wrong with a first date being less formal -- coffee, drinks, etc. But dumping courtship wholesale is rather a sad notion, IMO.
Posts: 32919 | Registered: Mar 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote: After an evening when she exchanged flirtatious glances with a bouncer at a Williamsburg nightclub, the bouncer invited her and her friends back to his apartment for whiskey and boxed macaroni and cheese. When she agreed, he gamely hoisted her over his shoulders, and, she recalled, “carried me home, my girlfriends and his bros in tow, where we danced around a tiny apartment to some MGMT and Ratatat remixes.”
She spent the night at the apartment, which kicked off a cycle of weekly hookups, invariably preceded by a Thursday night text message from him saying, ‘hey babe, what are you up to this weekend?” (It petered out after four months.)
This (bar the text messages) is probably a scenario which could have happened at any time after about 1965. Possibly even long before. It's nothing new at all, and it's not like nobody had any choice in the matter, or that the two of them probably expected anything more serious.
I hate dating with a passion - it's often weird, awkward and most people act like someone else when they're on them, because it's an 'official date'. I wish it would die out. But sadly, it hasn't yet. And the whole hook-up culture thing is way overstated. From my observations, most single people in their mid to late twenties aren't actually doing much of that - they're often having way less sex than they let on.
Posts: 1528 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
The single people I know are early 30s so I might be too old to see this. The guy paying seems a bit outdated, though the 34 year old male who dates a lot does pay for the woman. I think there is a lot of talk about hookup culture but it isn't what people are doing.
Posts: 2223 | Registered: Mar 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
Perhaps I'm really, really old-fashioned, but aren't dating and courtship two distinct concepts? Courtship has a "wedding or bust" feel, whereas dating is less... focused.
Posts: 1069 | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Um, this article is from the NYT Style section. Given the sideways looks and eye rolling any such "trend" piece gets from liberal blogger sites you probably hate even more (like Jezebel), and given that the article cites a TV show, Girls, which I've yet to meet someone who watches outside of the internet review sites who think an HBO show is news (and I'm the same age as the creator), frankly I wouldn't use this article as a harbinger of the end of the world. Or a description of a culture that includes a large swath of America.
Posts: 1757 | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Trends! Trends! Get yore trends here, only a dime the dozen! Get 'em while they're trendy!
Next week it'll be the return of arranged marriages in Utah, or of extended families all living in one house in Connecticut, or increased divorce-insurance premiums causing later marriages in the Ghanese-Hindu settlement of lower Florida. The thing about these newspapers is, they have to have an article every week whether or not there's anything worth talking about. Don't take it seriously.
Posts: 10645 | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
As a friend of mine pointed out, while this article does suck like most NY Times Style articles, it does have this one amazing passage:
quote:Bemoaning an anything-goes dating culture, Ms. Mamet, 24, recalled an encounter with a boyfriend whose idea of a date was lounging in a hotel room while he “Lewis and Clarked” her body, then tried to stick her father, the playwright David Mamet, with the bill, according to a Huffington Post report.
quote:But one [Hatrack's a family site, yo] musician's interaction with a social media manager hardly means that "Women in their 20s these days are lucky to get a last-minute text to tag along.
quote: If Lindsay wanted to stop the "cycle of weekly hookups," why wasn't she like, "let's go sit down and eat some spaghetti in a restaurant sometime," or why didn't she move on? How was the bouncer supposed to know that Lindsay wanted more — and why does he necessarily owe her more — than Annie's Mac and Cheese?
posted
I won't vouch for the accuracy of the entire article, but a lot things discussed in it are a decent window into "dating culture" as I've seen it. I'm now in my early thirties, and about two years ago I became single after getting out of a long term relationship. I'm also back in school and I've been meeting a lot of people younger than me. So I can vouch for a lot aspects of the article both in my personal experience dating, and in stories I've been told by people in their early to mid twenties.
Some women I went out on dates with have told me they haven't been out on a real date in years. Some women were shocked when I actually called them on the phone rather than just texted. Their friends would ask me if I had any single friends, and seemed to be in awe of this odd traditional dating style.
p.s. - in case you were wondering, no I haven't been dating 18 year olds. The women I've been dating have been in their mid to late twenties.
Posts: 8741 | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'll concur with Strider. It seems out of the norm (and woman are particularly impressed) when a man asks them on a traditional date -- even if it's only dinner. Even more curious is that genteel acts (opening doors, pulling out chairs) is almost anachronistic.
Heck, most girls insist on splitting the check. Though I never let them.
Posts: 1204 | Registered: Mar 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm not so impressed with the death of "traditional" (ie 1950s to 80s) dating. What is inherently superior about milkshakes, movies, the telephone and lookout point? That whole exercise was in itself an expression of shiny new 50's consumer ideals: car, jacket, movie, food, etc. so today we abuse or misuse communication tech to avoid awkwardness. Who is surprised by that? I have to say, while my current relationship didn't start with a series of rigid dates- I think the reason was that it didn't *have* to. When you had a single phone number, you had to set specific plans for an evening because you had no social flexibility. If a date changed, you couldn't adjust your schedule. Today, we can alter plans quickly, and thus don't need to demand high levels of commitment to specify, rigidly defined meetings. That can be good as well. My girlfriend, for instance, threw her back out the day before our second date. In the day of phone only communication, that probably would have ended things right there- but with Facebook, we were able to keep up a correspondence until we could meet again- and not spend hours on the phone.
Posts: 9912 | Registered: Nov 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
My wife and I met through Eharmony.com, and we lived about an hour away from each other. After our first date, we agreed that we had a standing date every weekend from then on. And we texted and called (no social networks) a lot. It was the perfect blend of "traditional dating" and using technology to keep in touch. I don't buy for a second that simply being able to contact each other through modern and convenient means, as Orincoro is saying, in any way shape or form is not compatible with "traditional dating". There is no problem with texting someone to let them know your timing, or for a quick hi at work, the problem that the article is describing is a lack of effort, no real attempt to woo. Texting is short hand, it is convenient sure, but it is informal, meant for people you already know and have established a relationship with. The formality of a "traditional date" is a good thing in my book, as it takes a lot of pressure off of both parties, as it provides a structure which holds up the interactions when you are basically trying to get to know and figure out if you like the total stranger sitting across from you.
Posts: 6683 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:But one [Hatrack's a family site, yo] musician's interaction
Um, being a family site means we can't use the word "clueless"?
I missed that memo . . .
Someone edited the Jezebel article. The word wasn't clueless when I copy and pasted. You can still see the original word if you Google the rest of the sentence, though that won't be for long. It's not that bad of a word in my opinion, but I figured I'd be on the safer side of the TOS.
Posts: 1757 | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Aros: Even more curious is that genteel acts (opening doors, pulling out chairs) is almost anachronistic.
Curious? Not really. Opening a can of worms here, but those "genteel" acts, flatter some women, but just make others really uncomfortable. They *show* her and others that you "care", but in terms of actually making someone happy, they don't do much and come off as patronizing. You do them because you are "supposed to" and you want other people to see you pulling out chairs and opening doors. Whether someone likes that sort of thing depends on to what degree the principals buy into the theater of romance. You'll impress more women by giving your waiter a big tip.
Posts: 1757 | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Orincoro, I use text and facebook as well for all sorts of communication, both flirtatious and otherwise.
I don't see this as an either/or type of question. It's just that, for a whole generation of people, phone calls and dates are a strange foreign thing. And it seems to be conducive to, though it doesn't necessitate, a hookup culture.
edit - I'm not making any evaluative judgments about hookup culture, but rather a descriptive claim about the conditions that seem to help it thrive.
Posts: 8741 | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Aros: Even more curious is that genteel acts (opening doors, pulling out chairs) is almost anachronistic.
Curious? Not really. Opening a can of worms here, but those "genteel" acts, flatter some women, but just make others really uncomfortable. They *show* her and others that you "care", but in terms of actually making someone happy, they don't do much and come off as patronizing. You do them because you are "supposed to" and you want other people to see you pulling out chairs and opening doors. Whether someone likes that sort of thing depends on to what degree the principals buy into the theater of romance. You'll impress more women by giving your waiter a big tip.
Disagree. It just depends on whether they see it as honest or as a gimmick. My brother still opens the car door after ten years. I open it for my daughter every time -- to the point that she'll stand outside in the cold and wait, if I haven't opened it yet.
I've yet to see a lady who, once she understands real manners and gallantry, is put off by it. Maybe it's the age groups?
And a tip should be discreet. If a lady sees how much a gentleman is tipping, he's either flaunting it, she's being nosy, or she's just happened to glimpse it in passing. Not saying that he should hide the check when he's filling it out, but signing a check isn't something everyone should see.
Posts: 1204 | Registered: Mar 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Aros: I've yet to see a lady who, once she understands real manners and gallantry, is put off by it.
Because if she is, she's no lady?
I happen to appreciate it if anyone -- male or female -- holds a door open for me. Less so if they pull out a chair, but I don't mind. But I can see why some people might not appreciate the gesture, and don't think that means they don't "understands real manners and gallantry".
Posts: 32919 | Registered: Mar 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Aros: If a lady sees how much a gentleman is tipping, he's either flaunting it, she's being nosy, or she's just happened to glimpse it in passing.
There is only one possible response to this. Posts: 32919 | Registered: Mar 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Strider: I won't vouch for the accuracy of the entire article, but a lot things discussed in it are a decent window into "dating culture" as I've seen it. I'm now in my early thirties, and about two years ago I became single after getting out of a long term relationship. I'm also back in school and I've been meeting a lot of people younger than me. So I can vouch for a lot aspects of the article both in my personal experience dating, and in stories I've been told by people in their early to mid twenties.
Some women I went out on dates with have told me they haven't been out on a real date in years. Some women were shocked when I actually called them on the phone rather than just texted. Their friends would ask me if I had any single friends, and seemed to be in awe of this odd traditional dating style.
p.s. - in case you were wondering, no I haven't been dating 18 year olds. The women I've been dating have been in their mid to late twenties.
Which makes me wonder if those old fuddy-duddies who used to go out on dates had something.
I'm not sure, if I were to find myself back in the "dating" scene, if I would be able to do it any other way. Which apparently would give me an advantage. Posts: 5957 | Registered: Oct 2001
| IP: Logged |
quote:I open it for my daughter every time -- to the point that she'll stand outside in the cold and wait, if I haven't opened it yet.
I find it surprising that you consider this a positive example. It's really very silly to sit and wait in the cold so she won't rob you of your opportunity to be gallant.
Posts: 4287 | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:I open it for my daughter every time -- to the point that she'll stand outside in the cold and wait, if I haven't opened it yet.
I find it surprising that you consider this a positive example. It's really very silly to sit and wait in the cold so she won't rob you of your opportunity to be gallant.
Yes, it's like she's out there waiting for a half hour.
No, my seven year old daughter assumes that men open doors for women. It's commonplace to her. Is this a Utah thing?
Posts: 1204 | Registered: Mar 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Strider: Orincoro, I use text and facebook as well for all sorts of communication, both flirtatious and otherwise.
I don't see this as an either/or type of question. It's just that, for a whole generation of people, phone calls and dates are a strange foreign thing. And it seems to be conducive to, though it doesn't necessitate, a hookup culture.
edit - I'm not making any evaluative judgments about hookup culture, but rather a descriptive claim about the conditions that seem to help it thrive.
I just don't buy it. I understand these things are used for hooking up. I never used them for that- but people have sought access to sex in every generation. The phone or the cotillion ball or whatever. I think people dont change that much- just technology gets ahead of social repression. People who hook up today would have 50 years ago. I know having Facebook and SMS and whatever makes me approximately 00% more likely to seek casual sex with acquaintances. It's not something I would do, no matter the ease. For those that use it that way, well, they are more successful at what they would be doing anyway.
Posts: 9912 | Registered: Nov 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:I open it for my daughter every time -- to the point that she'll stand outside in the cold and wait, if I haven't opened it yet.
I find it surprising that you consider this a positive example. It's really very silly to sit and wait in the cold so she won't rob you of your opportunity to be gallant.
Yes, it's like she's out there waiting for a half hour.
No, my seven year old daughter assumes that men open doors for women. It's commonplace to her. Is this a Utah thing?
I think it's old fashioned, and not a "Utah thing". I live in Utah, and I would prefer that my daughter doesn't pretend to be helpless, particularly when it means that she has to wait for things to happen the prescribed way, instead of the sensible way.
Posts: 4287 | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Besides, just because she loves it when her daddy opens doors for her, doesn't mean she'll grow up wanting or expecting a future boyfriend to do the same for her. There's often a big gap between being dad's little princess and teen or twenty in the dating pool.
quote: the article cites a TV show, Girls, which I've yet to meet someone who watches outside of the internet review sites who think an HBO show is news
I tried. I actually did. I watched about four episodes, and then realized that while watching it I felt as if I was punishing myself for something. What a depressing, unfunny, dull show.
Posts: 1528 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Aros: I've yet to see a lady who, once she understands real manners and gallantry, is put off by it.
Because if she is, she's no lady?
I happen to appreciate it if anyone -- male or female -- holds a door open for me. Less so if they pull out a chair, but I don't mind. But I can see why some people might not appreciate the gesture, and don't think that means they don't "understands real manners and gallantry".
Yeah I'm with Rivka (and scifibum and Bella).
I happily hold doors open for men and women both... When the situation calls for it. And I'm happy when people get a door for me, if that makes sense.
I'm happy to pay for my friends when we get dinner, and I like it when people treat me too. Splitting bills is fine too.
In general, it's nice to be around people who are courteous and thoughtful. And I try to be so, too.
I just don't get why people are so enthusiastic about clinging to impractical traditions based on genitals. What's the point? What value does that bring?
Posts: 3580 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Personally, I'm more impressed if a man holds the door for strangers than for me.
I hate the practice of a the man choosing the wine or my entree. I am perfectly capable of not only choosing my own food but ordering it from the waiter.
But I am particularly judgmental of men who don't understand how to properly hold a door. Because you don't just pull it open for you companion, you should also continue to hold it open for anyone within a reasonable radius. Its not a huge inconvenience because the first or second party to approach will usually include a gentleman who will wave the original door-holder through and then take up the task for their own group.
Posts: 1733 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
Personally, I open doors for people, not just men or just women. Opening car doors seems silly unless you are like in a high truck and the other person needs help getting down. Though in that case they probably should open the door themselves and the other assist. But I believe showing courtesy to everyone regardless of gender is important. And inconveniencing someone for no reason is not courteous.
Posts: 2223 | Registered: Mar 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Bella Bee: From my observations, most single people in their mid to late twenties aren't actually doing much of that - they're often having way less sex than they let on.
This, very much so.
I feel like this article is extremely one sided and overly negative - or rather, takes concepts that are (IMO) actually quite positive and tries to play them as negatively as possible. Take the "hanging out with friends" date, for example.
I met my current girlfriend swing dancing... we ended up dancing for 3 or 4 songs and I really enjoyed talking to her, so I gave her my number. 2 days later (a Saturday night) she sent me a text saying she was with her friends at O'Tools (a local Irish Pub) and wanted me to come down and hang out. I grabbed my buddy Jordan and we went down, sat and had a few drinks, told stories, got to know eachother, laughed, danced, and had a good time. It was an environment where we were both comfortable and relaxed, and I got to see her around her friends. How she interacted with them, the stories they told about her, what they thought of her. In other words - I got to see the person she was when she *wasn't* with me (and trying to impress me) instead of seeing some image she was trying to portray.
Later, I asked her out on a more traditional date. I bought her flowers, took her to dinner, we walked along the beach, kissed, went on a few more dates, and started going out. We're not completely traditional, though. For one thing, a lot of the time we're together, we're with our friends because, you know, it gets boring sometimes when it's just the 2 of you doing things. We like our friends, we like being with other people, we like doing interesting things.
Also, she often times takes *me* out to dinner, buys me little things to let me know she likes me, holds the car door for me if she's driving, and asks me out on dates. Not as often, since I make roughly twice as much money as her, I pay for about twice as much stuff, but it's pretty balanced.
What's interesting, though, is that for as much as the person writing this article assumes it's all about hooking up for sex, a lot of these "casual dates" don't even end in a kiss - it's about getting to know someone in a relaxed environment. OTOH, on really formal, fancy dates, with one person paying for a lot of stuff, there's a much higher expectation for some sort of physical intimacy at the end (whether that's a kiss, making out, sex, or whatever) and a much higher chance for resentment and disappointment if it doesn't happen.
In my case, even if my girlfriend and I didn't end up liking eachother, we each would still have had a great time - me hanging out with my buddy Jordan and meeting some new girls (and maybe snagging one or two numbers), her hanging out with her girlfriends and having a fun night. I also feel it gave the relationship a chance to develop more organically. If she had, say, invited me out on a really formal date after we had only actually met each other once, it would have been really awkward and put a lot of pressure on both of us to put on a show. So to speak.
I guess my thing is, there's certainly still a place for courtship and romance, and it definitely happens... but not on the first date, anymore. It doesn't actually mean people are being more promiscuous.
Posts: 2222 | Registered: Dec 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
If we're sending our anecdotes out for mock duels: people are really being more "promiscuous". Casual dating and hookup culture is growing to prominence. People who are fortunate enough not to have to date don't really date because it is such a yesterday thing.
quote:Originally posted by Aros: It's commonplace to her. Is this a Utah thing?
No. It too is a yesterday thing. Old outmoded chauvinistic attitudes about how we are supposed to treat ladies and how they are supposed to appreciate us treating them that way.
It is a good thing it is going away because it is a bad thing if you don't understand why your statement about women and tipping and how you gallantly refuse to let them split the check really gets a "..........wow" out of people.
Posts: 805 | Registered: Jun 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
Oh balony. People who want to hook up for sex are going to hook up for sex, regardless of how tight or loose the social mores governing dating are. I've been surrounded by the one night stand glorifying culture portrayed in our media for many years and it hasn't made me any more desirous of having a random hookup. There's simply less backlash, socially, for those who do desire such things. I don't really see why it's my place to stop them.
It's like saying the recent (past 30 yearsish) social acceptance of homosexuality has caused significantly more men to become gay, like it's somehow catching. It's just shoddy logic.
Posts: 2222 | Registered: Dec 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
A few years ago, an LDS leader bemoaned the "hang-out" culture he saw developing among young people (specifically, young members of the Church). His problem was that so many people would hang-out, but then never progress from there. This article seems to decry the very means of getting together at all. Even the LDS Church would shy away from saying you should never hang-out, rather asking that at some point you progress to dating.
What were they trying to say exactly? Was it give a few examples of people with poor social skills (my information says they’ve been around for some time)? Was it to say technology has ruined dating (that doesn’t seem likely, and they certainly didn’t make a strong case for it)? The article suggests that they were trying to somehow show that courting is over but the text of the article implied that ever forming into couples is over and that’s demonstrably not true.
quote: I open it for my daughter every time -- to the point that she'll stand outside in the cold and wait, if I haven't opened it yet.
For reference, this is to me both bizarre and abhorrent, although mildly so for both.
I hold doors for people behind me or people who are carrying heavy things. I teaach children to hold doors for each other. I never teach boys to treat girls differently than they should treat other boys, or vice versa. What would be the point in that? Exactly what would I be trying to show to one gender or the other? That girls get precedence? That it's up to boys to "allow" girls to go through doors or sit down in chairs? That boys cannot engage with girls normally and must put on a performance of kindness rather than genuinely demonstrating, to all, that they think about others?
posted
The article itself is pretty mind-numbing. I don't think we should take it seriously in the slightest.
Posts: 8473 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote: I open it for my daughter every time -- to the point that she'll stand outside in the cold and wait, if I haven't opened it yet.
For reference, this is to me both bizarre and abhorrent, although mildly so for both.
I hold doors for people behind me or people who are carrying heavy things. I teaach children to hold doors for each other. I never teach boys to treat girls differently than they should treat other boys, or vice versa. What would be the point in that? Exactly what would I be trying to show to one gender or the other? That girls get precedence? That it's up to boys to "allow" girls to go through doors or sit down in chairs? That boys cannot engage with girls normally and must put on a performance of kindness rather than genuinely demonstrating, to all, that they think about others?
+1 to rivka's response.
I obviously don't express myself well. For my daughter to wait a few moments, smile on her face, for her father to open her door . . . is not bizarre. It's sweet.
I guess I'm used to being on the losing side of an argument. I was raised old fashioned, on a farm in Utah, with old fashioned values. For a man to open a lady's car door . . . to pull out her chair . . . to scrape the ice off her car windows . . . to carry the groceries. I don't see how these are bad things. And I've been back on the dating market for over a year -- I've only gotten positive reactions.
So . . . it's a good thing to throw out traditional manners? To keep the positive aspects of traditional gender roles? I agree with throwing out the negative ones, equality and all. But there's something to be said for tradition. Bah. I'll let you kids have your casual sex culture. I still believe in the ideal of a gentleman.
I guess I should just keep my coat, rather than offer it to a lady, if she forgets hers. Posts: 1204 | Registered: Mar 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm not much of a dater but I am a member of the millennial generation in question. I've lurked on this but here is my position on these things.
Pulling out her chair seems really forced, I would be afraid she thinks I am trying too hard.
Same thing about the car door. I can't see how it isn't awkward to make her wait so I can open the door for her instead of going to driver side.
I prefer to pay for dinner and those kinds of date things. Without loan or lien mind you. If I'm spending time with anyone it is because I enjoy their company and find them interesting, paying for a meal or access to a show is just my way of saying that I appreciate them. I have also had a girlfriend take me out for the night, I took it in the spirit it was given.
I open doors for women. I open doors for men. I even open doors for complete strangers who I'm not trying to bone. Opening doors is just good manners, regardless of any particular genitalia.
I'm not a fan of texting, the awkward silences are annoying and the conversations so limited. I would be hesitant to ask someone out via keyboard of any kind, it isn't something to be done impersonally.
I have no problem offering my coat when it is cold, I'm a big guy and I don't care about the weather often but most of my coats are heavy and warm.
If my date wants to go dutch, open the door for me and offer me her coat? I would wonder why her coat can fit me. Not much else. Gender equality has some funny outcomes.
Posts: 2302 | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Dogbreath: I've been surrounded by the one night stand glorifying culture portrayed in our media for many years and it hasn't made me any more desirous of having a random hookup
Heh. I would say, if anything, it makes me *less* desirous of a random hookup.
Notice though, if you will, the shift on what is "edgy," in pop art today moving *away* from the image of the man being defined by his ability to screw anything that moves.
For instance: Jason Bourne is in one long term relationship. When his girlfriend dies, he doesn't jump on the next thing out of grief.
James Bond also doesn't have casual sex with just anyone (at least not for the first two movies), and Batman also doesn't get laid for 2 films, until he does get laid, and it turns out to have been a bad misjudgment.
Really, do you think such films would have been so discerning about male sexuality 20 years ago? I find that a positive change.
Posts: 9912 | Registered: Nov 2005
| IP: Logged |
If my date wants to go dutch, open the door for me and offer me her coat? I would wonder why her coat can fit me. Not much else. Gender equality has some funny outcomes.
I don't know- I still have an ego problem about size. I'm big and very strong. I once had a date with a girl who was (no kidding) about 6' 8" and outweighed me by a few pounds (not fat though). I couldn't get over it. My current girlfriend is a hair taller than me at 6'2" and that's hard enough. Maybe I'm a chauvinist, sure, I don't know.
Posts: 9912 | Registered: Nov 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by El JT de Spang: Your ideal of a gentleman is chauvinistic, so don't get too comfortable on your high horse.
I'm pretty flabbergasted by the popular opinion here. So, the argument is that men shouldn't open doors, pull out chairs, walk on the road side of the sidewalk, etc, because it's misogynistic or chauvinistic.
quote:Originally posted by El JT de Spang: Your ideal of a gentleman is chauvinistic, so don't get too comfortable on your high horse.
Bah, being kind to people isn't chauvinist...men have more muscle, generate more heat, it makes perfect sense to offer someone your coat if they are cold and you fine. As to opening doors, I open the door for anyone who needs it.
Carrying groceries for women folk also makes sense, as again, men folk generally have more muscle and are larger.
As to paying for checks...who cares? If someone is more comfortable (both emotionally or financially) flipping the bill, then great, if dutch, fine. It's just a traditional way of letting someone know you like them.
As to having a man order for the woman...yuck! I've always liked girls who know what they like, have a brain in their heads and are not afraid to voice their opinions.
As to pulling out a chair...I've only ever done it at very formal situations, like weddings, where more ceremonial manners are called for.
Posts: 6683 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Aros: Bubble of evil, really? That's too much dude.
The site you linked to has some good tips, but this one I disagree with:
quote:Remove Your Hat Indoors Yes, this is an old one, but a good one. If you’re going someplace and you’ll be staying a while, take your hat off. It just shows a little respect for the establishment you’re entering. Don’t want to because your hair will get messed up? Too bad -- in that case, you shouldn’t have worn a hat. This isn’t the 1950s, and a hat is no longer a de facto part of a man’s wardrobe. If it’s the dead of winter and you’re wearing a beanie or ski cap for warmth, don’t worry about it. Everyone else’s hair will look just as bad.
"It's just good manners" is not a great reason, a lot of things we do are purely for the feelings of others, but putting effort into being aware of people's emotions is different then placating some odd ritual that is meaningless and mostly extinct anyway.
Posts: 6683 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'd reckon that it's the opposite of chauvinism. Traditional Southern etiquette isn't about putting women down . . . it's about elevating them.
Posts: 1204 | Registered: Mar 2003
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[ROFL]](graemlins/rofl.gif)
