i fear the day that who ever broke the last post thread, finds this page.
Posted by Boris (Member # 6935) on :
Wow. That was...interesting.
Posted by Grisha (Member # 6871) on :
on the site there is a link to prime number with 7,816,230 digits, which is 3,762,284 more digits than this one.
wow, i find this way too interesting.
Posted by kaioshin00 (Member # 3740) on :
That's a prime link there, grisha. Thanks!
Posted by SteveRogers (Member # 7130) on :
I love it. I have to show this to my Algebra teacher.
Posted by PTGumby (Member # 7576) on :
good thing it's not a long number or it would take ten minutes to load
Posted by digging_holes (Member # 6237) on :
Can I quote it?
Posted by Epictetus (Member # 6235) on :
Whoa!
Posted by SteveRogers (Member # 7130) on :
Quote it! Quote it! Quote it!
Posted by digging_holes (Member # 6237) on :
You do it.
Posted by Eruve Nandiriel (Member # 5677) on :
Wow, that page took forever to finish loading. And I have fast internet.
Posted by Grisha (Member # 6871) on :
you know if they added the commas every three digits it would add 2,605,410 more characters to the number, which i imagines would make it take even longer to load
Posted by Eruve Nandiriel (Member # 5677) on :
I was going to quote it, but it broke the "Preview Post" page...so I decided not to.
Posted by digging_holes (Member # 6237) on :
Wise decision.
Posted by Raia (Member # 4700) on :
Posted by kaioshin00 (Member # 3740) on :
m39 ≈ ∞
My pardon if this crashed your browser.
[ March 21, 2005, 02:46 AM: Message edited by: kaioshin00 ]
Posted by AntiCool (Member # 7386) on :
edit: Thanks.
One inaccessable thread is enough, thankyouverymuch.
[ March 21, 2005, 10:54 AM: Message edited by: AntiCool ]
Posted by gnixing (Member # 768) on :
so, what's the problem with this thread?
Posted by gnixing (Member # 768) on :
you all are nuts.
Posted by rivka (Member # 4859) on :
Thank you.
[ March 21, 2005, 02:55 AM: Message edited by: rivka ]
Posted by Grisha (Member # 6871) on :
you say that like it's a bad thing.
Posted by Annie (Member # 295) on :
Is this an example of math dorks trying to be funny?
Posted by AntiCool (Member # 7386) on :
Nothing so sophisticated.
Posted by Verily the Younger (Member # 6705) on :
I have a hard time imagining who would even find this interesting. Not criticizing those who do, I'm just saying that I don't get it.