This is topic And Mr. Bush selects... in forum Books, Films, Food and Culture at Hatrack River Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.hatrack.com/ubb/main/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=036510

Posted by Tresopax (Member # 1063) on :
 
New Supreme Court justice to be announed tonight!

Who will the President select? Who will be mad afterwards? Will we all survive?
 
Posted by Jim-Me (Member # 6426) on :
 
I think who will be mad afterwards is pretty easy to figure...
 
Posted by kojabu (Member # 8042) on :
 
Sorry, I haven't really been following this, is this before or after Senate approval.
 
Posted by Jhai (Member # 5633) on :
 
Edith Jones is going pretty strongly on the markets... http://www.tradesports.com/jsp/intrade/contractSearch/#
(Go to legal on the left, then Supreme Court)
But she's not the favorite, according to the bookies: http://tinyurl.com/duml6
(Click on "Next Justice Appointed to US Supreme Court")

The markets were right about the presidential race...
 
Posted by Tresopax (Member # 1063) on :
 
I don't think it is clear who will be mad - that all depends on who gets selected.

I think the biggest possibility for disappointment and anger lies with the pro-life movement, if the candidate is not clearly and solidly in favor of overturning Roe v. Wade. Given that most of the 6 Roe supporters on the court are younger, if they can't even get a strong evangelical conservative like Bush to appoint a judge that will overturn it, it will probably not be overturned in this generation. Nevertheless, some of the names being floated as favorites of Bush are not clearly anti-Roe.
 
Posted by AndrewR (Member # 619) on :
 
How much do you want to bet that he'll sneak in (but phrased much nicer), "...and don't you Democrats dare try to filibuster this nominee!!!" [Smile]
 
Posted by Glenn Arnold (Member # 3192) on :
 
quote:
How much do you want to bet that he'll sneak in (but phrased much nicer), "...and don't you Democrats dare try to filibuster this nominee!!!"
Done.

quote:
McClellan said the American people expected that the Senate confirmation process would be a dignified one.

 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
You know, even as pro-life as I am, I'm not even expecting Roe vs. Wade to be overturned no matter who president Bush selects. What I'm more interested in is a justice that supports individual rights, like my right to own property.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
Duh. Karl Rove.
 
Posted by The Pixiest (Member # 1863) on :
 
Are you kidding? Everyone will be mad.
 
Posted by Dan_raven (Member # 3383) on :
 
I am a bit nervous that he's taking this to the public first in a national TV. I am afraid he knows that his choice is going to be controversial, so he wants to grab as much media as he can to promote his view in the face of an expected strong reaction from Democrats and moderate Republicans.

I am hoping that I am wrong about this. I can think of a dozen good reasons for him to pick a good, dignified, judge who is not pro-life or pro-choice or pro-Christian or pro-state, but who is pro-law and anti-politics.
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
quote:
a good, dignified, judge who is not pro-life or pro-choice or pro-Christian or pro-state, but who is pro-law and anti-politics.
That's exactly what I'd like to see too.

I hate the litmus tests, no matter what side presents them.
 


Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2