My football bud here at work just laughed at me. But consider this. Draft experts are pretty ok with the pick of Anthony Fasano still thinking he's going to back up Witten.
Jones announced that Fasano will be expected to come in and start in two tight end sets. He was taken higher than Witten. If he is even nearly the same caliber player, look out.
Because you have Terrell Owens on one side, Terry Glenn on the other. Old you say? well, 32, yes. But if you want to single cover either one of them, be my guest. TO is TO (for good or ill) and Glenn led the league in average yards per catch last year. But if you double up both of them you have two high-caliber tight ends being covered by linebackers (and that's assuming you don't blitz). Witten has proven that he will eat them up. Fasano projects to do the same.
So go nickel, right? except then you have Julius Jones or Marion Barber running out of a two tight end set. With 6 in the box... oops.
It's the run and shoot, except that you have 260 lb tight ends on the line of scrimmage instead of double-slotted 180 lb wide outs. In short, it's like the run and shoot except you can really run.
Trying to stop 3rd and 3 is gonna suck for you guys this year.
That having been said, I'm not looking forward to having to defend Carolina, either, with Keyshawn and D'angelo Williams added on to Steve Smith. Jake Delhomme is a good fantasy investment.
[ May 01, 2006, 06:43 PM: Message edited by: Jim-Me ]
Posted by prolixshore (Member # 4496) on :
Go Carolina! I'm looking forward to the offense, but the defense is not something I am as sure of as in previous years. They lost some key guys, but hopefully they will still be in good shape.
--ApostleRadio
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
The skins will win the NFC East this year. We've improved exactly where we needed to this off season, Gibbs kept his coaching staff together, and we're ready to roll.
Posted by Jim-Me (Member # 6426) on :
Bring it on, deadskin fan!
Seriously, we'll see, but it looks like another exciting year... the beast in the east is back!
Poor Philly. I could almost feel sorry for them...
Posted by Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy (Member # 9384) on :
Here are my division-leader predictions: (let the flame war begin)
AFC East - Miami AFC North - Pittsburgh AFC South - Indy AFC West - Denver
NFC East - Washington NFC North - Chicago NFC South - Carolina NFC West - Seattle
The NFC East will definitely be the most interesting to watch. I wouldn't be surprised to see a situation like last year's AFC West, where three teams have a shot at the playoffs.
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
Redskins had hands-down the worst draft.
That is all.
Posted by Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy (Member # 9384) on :
quote:Redskins had hands-down the worst draft.
They had bad draft position, but they didn't screw up like, say, Houston.
What on earth did they get from Denver in exchange for a first-round pick though??
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
They had bad draft position and they screwed up much worse than Houston.
Posted by Sopwith (Member # 4640) on :
Okay, here are my wayyyy early predictions:
NFC North: 1. Chicago 2. Detroit 3. Minnesota 4. Green Bay
NFC South: 1. Carolina 2. Tampa Bay 3. New Orleans 4. Atlanta
NFC East: 1. NY Giants 2. Dallas 3. Washington 4. Philadelphia
NFC West: 1. Seattle 2. Arizona 3. San Francisco 4. St. Louis
AFC North: 1. Pittsburg 2. Cleveland 3. Cincinnati 4. Baltimore
AFC South: 1. Jacksonville 2. Indianapolis 3. Houston 4. Tennessee
AFC East: 1. Miami 2. Buffalo 3. New England 4. NY Jets
AFC West: 1. Kansas City 2. Denver 3. Oakland 4. San Diego
Super Bowl: Kansas City/ Carolina
Posted by TheTick (Member # 2883) on :
Living in Buffalo, I usually hear a ton about the Bills starting well before the draft. The success of the Sabres definitely reduced that as I had no idea who they were targetting in the draft. They got players for positions where they have actual needs. I know the punditry thinks they could've traded down and still taken Whitner but nobody's perfect. I like the two DTs and OTs taken, and am heartily glad they did NOT take another wideout or tight end for the third straight year.
Oh yeah, almost forgot: They didn't want Leinart. Taking him at 8 would've guaranteed more season ticket sales but Marv is not about that kind of draft.
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
My problem with Whitner is that they got offered a trade to move down to 14, where they could have easily still picked up Whitner plus a second round pick and they turned it down. If that's true, it's an idiotic move.
Posted by TheTick (Member # 2883) on :
There was some information that Detroit wanted a safety out there at some point, so I think they wanted to go ahead and get their guy when they KNEW they could.
I find this idea of a pick being a 'reach' silly, anyway. 90% of players drafted are going to suck hard anyway, if Whitner is good then it's a good pick.
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
Maybe, in which case they have some player evaluation problems. Since Whitner was ranked as the 3rd best safety on most boards.
But, as you say, if he can play it's a good pick. The idea is to minimize how many sucky players you give huge signing bonuses to. Therein lies the 'reach'.
Posted by pooka (Member # 5003) on :
I thought this would be a thread having to do with newfoundlogic. And then I start reading and am like "well, he was interested in sports." I'm scanning the whole thread before I realize "oh, National Football League". D'oh!
Posted by Jim-Me (Member # 6426) on :
sorry for the confusion, pooka.
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
*blink*
pooka! I haven't seen you in a looooong time. How ya been?
Oh, and the 'boys suck, Jim-Me. Get used to it. Posted by Jim-Me (Member # 6426) on :
yeah just because you swept us last year... and half of that because you got lucky... the other half because we were injured...
but you know... five rings to how many? two?
see ya' on the field... and our old re-tread coach can kick your old re-tread coach's butt. Posted by TheTick (Member # 2883) on :
At least you guys have old re-tread coaches...we got our old re-tread coach, and made him GM.
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
quote:but you know... five rings to how many? two?
Three, thank you very much.
Posted by Jim-Me (Member # 6426) on :
What? you mean having a "football guy" as GM isn't a good thing? *cough* Millen *cough*
Posted by Jim-Me (Member # 6426) on :
When was the third? (seriously) I know one with Doug Williams and one with Mark Rypien...
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
You forgot Riggo in the 80s.
Posted by Jim-Me (Member # 6426) on :
Wasn't he on the Doug Williams team?
dang it, now I'm gonna have to look this up...
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
Nope. Thiesman was QB. 1983.
Posted by Jim-Me (Member # 6426) on :
Ah, Theisman. No wonder I forgot.
Posted by Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy (Member # 9384) on :
Speaking of football players in management positions...any guesses as to whether Gary Kubiak can inject some life into the Texans?
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
Without an offensive line, no.
Almost makes you wonder if trading down for a few first-round picks would have been worth the high-quality OLs they could have gotten.
Not sure what I think of the 'Boys. Then again, I try not to do so. Posted by Brian J. Hill (Member # 5346) on :
I like Kubiak and think he may help the Texans in the long run, but ditto on the OL comment. And passing up on one of the best RB prospects in a draft since Emmett Smith for a DE, even a good one, is stupid. I believe fully in the "offense wins games, defense wins championships" maxim, but you ain't gonna get to the championship with David Carr on his back.
And come on, Sopwith, Tennessee bottom of the AFC South? With the draft they had? Are you nuts?
Posted by Humean316 (Member # 8175) on :
With that Denver system under his belt? Absolutely, Kubiak will definately be good for the Texans. And I dont know, taking Mario Williams over Reggis Bush is probably a better football move, but certainly not a better PR move. If the defense can be dominate, Kubiak can take that offense and make it better, and while they wont win 10 games, they will more than likely win 7, if they can protect Carr and not get him killed.
The boys are interesting too, they didnt address their secondary problems, but they did get an impact reciever and tight end that will end help greatly in the running game. Their defense should be better this year, and if Bledsoe and Jones hold up, they could certainly win the East. Phily is gonna come back this year, and I dont know what you guys who picked the skins are smoking. Mark Brunell is your qb again, and I dont see him having a better season, in fact, I think he reverts to his 2004 form.
I think the best team in the NFC is, wait for it, Carolina. Picking up Keyshawn is huge and I think they will go back to the superbowl this year.
My sleeper pick is the Arizona Cardinals. With Edge, Warner, Bolden, and Fitz, they could easily see the NFC championship against the Panters. I think Atlanta will be much better this year, Tampa will fall off, as will the Giants.
In the AFC, the best team is the Steelers, although if Joseph Addai for the Colts can be that back that Manning needs, an improved D and Oline, should make it interesting. Also, the pats are back with the draft they had, picking up the best WR in the draft and a good back in Mulroney. I think the sleeper teams of the AFC are Baltimore (especially if they get Mcnair) and Miami.
LOL, too much?
Posted by Brian J. Hill (Member # 5346) on :
I really like Carolina too, but I'm biased because I think I really like Jeff King, a tight end they drafted on Day 2. I think he has the poise to make an immediate impact in the NFL. Though he's a little slow for a receiver, his workhorse ability and great hands makes him a great go-to guy.
Posted by Sopwith (Member # 4640) on :
Hehehe, my picks are of course wayyyy early and are purely speculation.
I put Tennessee fourth because the team will be going through a serious transition here. Looks like McNair is headed to Baltimore, taking away veteran leadership in a very, very young team. If Billy Volek takes the helm for the whole year, they'll do better. But I can't see Vince Young taking over early on and pulling a Rothelisburger. There just isn't enough veteran talent there to prop him up.
Posted by Jim-Me (Member # 6426) on :
ditto sopwith's comments on Tennessee. I think they had a great draft, but aside from running backs and occasionally corners, key players take time to develop.
As for the cowboys' secondary problems, they actually did and did cheap. Watkins in the 5th round is exactly what they were missing last year-- a fast, deep center fielder. Also their 6th rounder from last year had a fantastic preseason but went on IR before the season started. It'll be interesting to see what he brings to the table.
I think the problem with the Texans (as with the Cardnials) is at the top. I like Kubiak and Green both. I think both teams are beyond their help. (though I did like their drafts, with the big caveat being, if you weren't picking Bush, trade down).
Posted by Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy (Member # 9384) on :
quote:With that Denver system under his belt? Absolutely, Kubiak will definately be good for the Texans. And I dont know, taking Mario Williams over Reggis Bush is probably a better football move, but certainly not a better PR move. If the defense can be dominate, Kubiak can take that offense and make it better, and while they wont win 10 games, they will more than likely win 7, if they can protect Carr and not get him killed.
That's sort of what I'm thinking. Denver's offensive system has a tendency to make mediocre players good; they won 13 games last year in the toughest division in the NFL, without any real star power. If Kubiak can translate that to Houston, we may see them come close to breaking even this season, draft disasters aside.
quote:My sleeper pick is the Arizona Cardinals. With Edge, Warner, Bolden, and Fitz, they could easily see the NFC championship against the Panters.
The Cardinals are certainly going to have an interesting year. The problem is that they are in the same division as Seattle. It's unlikely that they will win the division, and the wild card competition in the NFC is going to be brutal.
quote:In the AFC, the best team is the Steelers, although if Joseph Addai for the Colts can be that back that Manning needs, an improved D and Oline, should make it interesting. Also, the pats are back with the draft they had, picking up the best WR in the draft and a good back in Mulroney. I think the sleeper teams of the AFC are Baltimore (especially if they get Mcnair) and Miami.
I'm not sure how clear it is that the Steelers are the best team in the AFC. I'm not even sure they were the best last year; they certainly won when it counted, but they weren't having a great season until the end. They were lucky to even make the playoffs.
I think the four teams I cited as division leaders will all be Super Bowl contenders. Indy and Pittsburgh both addressed their significant off-season losses (Antwaan Randle-El, the Edge, etc) in the draft, but draft players are always a risk. Miami is going to be a power if Dante Culpepper stays healthy, and it looks like their schedule is relatively easy. Denver lost very little to free agency and filled a glaring need with Javon Walker; if they can deal with some of the consistency issues they had last season (like choking in the AFC Championship), they will be able to take on just about anyone.
Posted by TheTick (Member # 2883) on :
I love coming back to threads like this. The NFL never ceases to surprise, even just a few weeks in. Looks like we were too quick to doubt New England and anoint Miami. New Orleans is a great story even with the loss today. Also, what the heck is wrong in the Giants locker room? As soon as they have some adversity they blow up and start pointing fingers.
Watching the Bills today, it's amazing what a difference I could see from the coaches last year. Had Mularkey been coaching, as soon as he felt the running game wasn't working (round about 10-15 carries) they would've had their inexperienced QB (or more likely the lame duck Kelly Holcomb) trying to win the game through the air. Miami fans are getting a taste of Mularkey's antics with the dismal performance of Culpepper. Anyway, the Bills look sharper every week on offense. McGahee can pound it inside or break off runs outside, and the top four receivers have been making plays left and right. The draft picks have fit right in, Whitner especially. The one thing they need to do is learn to finish off a game. Teams keep scoring late on them, although it does make it more interesting to watch.
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
Giants are chock full of me-first prima donnas. That's the problem with them, primarily.
The 'Cards stink, which is predictable because their line is abysmal. Same with the Texans. Mario Williams over Reggie Bush is looking dumber and dumber, although Bush isn't exactly a gamebreaker yet.
Posted by stihl1 (Member # 1562) on :
Watch out for the Lions! We're aiming for 0-16 baby! Perfect season!
Posted by TheTick (Member # 2883) on :
Hey, Williams finally got a sack yesterday, right? Of course, it took C-Pep holding on to the ball too long. When freaking Ryan Denney sacks him 3 times in 15 plays, a number 1 draft choice should be nailing him every play. Poor Houston.
You are probably right about the Giants. It's almost sad, they have such talent, but it falls apart at the slightest adversity.
edit: I hadn't watched the highlights yet when I made the 'Mularkey's antics' comment...seriously, a halfback pass for the 2 point conversion? VINTAGE Mularkey.
[ October 02, 2006, 11:18 AM: Message edited by: TheTick ]
Posted by Dr Strangelove (Member # 8331) on :
Did anyone else notice how loud the crowd cheered when Williams got that sack? I thought there was a fumble or something. And he did tip the pass for the 2-point conversion. I don't usually pay attention to NFL football, but it's a great way to kill a sunday afternoon.
Posted by B34N (Member # 9597) on :
quote:Originally posted by prolixshore: Go Carolina! I'm looking forward to the offense, but the defense is not something I am as sure of as in previous years. They lost some key guys, but hopefully they will still be in good shape.
--ApostleRadio
Yeah, go carolina - what are they 1-3.
How Bout Dem Boys! 3-1 going into Philly, We'll see if TO and everyone shows up to make a game out of it!
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
OK, we're ready for the season to start now in Washington. Posted by B34N (Member # 9597) on :
Redskins Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
quote:Yeah, go carolina - what are they 1-3.
Um, they're 2 and 2. And if you pay close attention, you'll notice that they're suddenly playing very good football.
Redskins followed up their awful draft with an even worse first month. They're an embarrassment.
Posted by Brian J. Hill (Member # 5346) on :
If Texas decided for some reason that they didn't need Reggie Bush in their backfield, they should have AT LEAST decided to trade him for about 3 more draft picks. Then they could have gotten what they really need . . . an O-Line to keep David Carr off his butt.
Posted by Sopwith, again (Member # 9457) on :
On Carolina, a team near and dear to me, we're 2-2 and it's a shaky .500 we're at.
Our offensive line is beginning to gel, but we aren't able to get our best linemen to stay healthy. Add to that a revolving door at tight end, and it's made the job harder for Delhomme, Foster and Williams. Hoover's still a good fullback at least.
Keyshawn's been a great addition, and Smith will improve as his hamstrings heal. Carter flashes some ability, but I still hold out hope that Colbert will return to his 2004 form (I don't think his feet have healed completely yet).
On defense, I think our two biggest mistakes were letting Will Witherspoon go (especially after More Headshots Morgan has proved he's so fragile) and not returning Brentson Buckner. Buckner was aging but he provided so much in the center of that line. Add to that the loss of Ricky Manning (love how he played, not so hot on his off-field transgressions), and we don't have the defense we once did.
I still think we're going to the playoffs, but man, it's going to be a long, tough road. But maybe our injuries this early might serve us better down the road as the season wears on.
Also, the Saints worry me much more than the Falcons this year. The Saints are better than they possibly have ever been.
Posted by Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy (Member # 9384) on :
quote:The NFL never ceases to surprise, even just a few weeks in. Looks like we were too quick to doubt New England and anoint Miami.
I still doubt New England. Especially after the Broncos game. But it may be the Jets instead of Miami. I've been very impressed by the Jets so far, especially this past Sunday. Yes, they lost, but they were the only team so far that actually looked capable of beating Indy.
quote:OK, we're ready for the season to start now in Washington.
I was only half-kidding a couple of weeks ago when I said that the Redskins should make Antwaan Randle-El their starting QB, but then Mark Brunell started posting QB ratings approaching 120...
quote:Also, the Saints worry me much more than the Falcons this year. The Saints are better than they possibly have ever been.
I'm curious as to how long the Saints will continue to do well. It would take a hell of a coaching job to make this honeymoon last a whole season. I'm not saying it won't happen, but I have my doubts...
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
quote:Looks like we were too quick to doubt New England and anoint Miami.
Some of us were, perhaps...
Posted by Jim-Me (Member # 6426) on :
Yeah... some of us.
Jax not only could have, but *should* have beat Indy, and, despite their loss at the Redskins, I think they will actually win that division this year.
if there is a guarantee in life, it is that the Cardnials and Dolphins will underperform.
The Cowboys are only 2-1 at this point, not 3-1, but I like what I'm seeing very much. The line was supposed to be their weak point. They are currently tied for second in the NFL in both rushing TDs (5) and sacks (3) and Julius Jones is the NFL's 12th leading rusher, despite the early bye. Only Johnson and Tomlinson have out rushed him in the same number of games, and JJ and MB3 are on a pace to combine for 2107 yds, a 5 yard average, and 21 TDs. #5 defense and #6 offense in the league right now, too.
I'm looking forward to what I think will be a defining game at Philly, who has the #1 offense in the NFL, but largely because the best defense they have played so far has been San Francisco (ranked 24th).
I did a late (right before the season started) readjustment on the NFC South as a whole. 11-5 won that division last year and they played the NFC North and AFC East, easily the two worst divisions in football last year. Throw in the disorganized and homeless Saints and they basically had about 8 gimme games each last year.
This year, they have the NFC East and AFC North, two of the toughest divisions in football, and the Saints are a much improved team (defensively so on the backs of a couple of cowboys cast-off linebackers ). I think 9-7 takes that division. Which means if the Saints can go 6-6 from here while maintaining tiebreakers over Atlanta, I think they take the division.
Posted by Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy (Member # 9384) on :
quote:Jax not only could have, but *should* have beat Indy, and, despite their loss at the Redskins, I think they will actually win that division this year.
Jacksonville is going to have a very difficult time catching up to Indy. Jacksonville has already lost two games, and the only real difference in their schedules is that Indy has to play Denver, whereas Jax has to play KC. Indy controls their own destiny at this point. Jax will get the wildcard fairly easily though.
quote:The Cowboys are only 2-1 at this point, not 3-1, but I like what I'm seeing very much.
I'm not sure how I feel about the Cowboys. They have had two big games so far; they lost to Jax, and beat a horrifically underperforming Redskins. They have a difficult schedule ahead, and competition for wild cards in the NFC will be fierce. Dallas has a good shot at winning the division, but Philly will certainly give them a fight.
Posted by Paul Goldner (Member # 1910) on :
"I still doubt New England. Especially after the Broncos game. But it may be the Jets instead of Miami. I've been very impressed by the Jets so far, especially this past Sunday. Yes, they lost, but they were the only team so far that actually looked capable of beating Indy."
If you think the jets are better then NE, you're deluding yourself. The score in that game didn't indicate how badly the pats manhandled the jets. While the jets might be better then they have been, new england should easily win 11 games, and take the division, unless brady goes down. That running attack is ferocious. When you run for 150-160 yards a game (or 223 as they did against Cinci) you don't need your wide receivers to do much more then catch the ball when asked to, and with graham and watson at tight end, you aren't going to ask your corps of receivers to catch more then 10 passes per game most times.
Maybe not the powerhouse they were 2003-2004, but still by far the best team in the east.
Posted by Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged (Member # 7476) on :
What a nice game in Philly...I almost had a heart attack at the endd but my Eagles pulled it out in the end. So much for the TO hype.
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
Same old Lions. Now 0-5. Kitna looks as pathetic at quarterback as Harrington ever did. The U of M could beat them. In fact, U of M would be favored by 12 points, at least. Thank goodness we Detroit area fans have the Tigers to cheer for!
Posted by Jim-Me (Member # 6426) on :
quote:Originally posted by Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged: What a nice game in Philly...I almost had a heart attack at the endd but my Eagles pulled it out in the end. So much for the TO hype.
I am beside myself with rage, not because we lost but because of how we lost.
We had the game in hand. We were running well and had them perfectly set up for plays to take advantage of overpursuit because of the lights out blitzing-- more draws, some screens, play action, a reverse or flea flicker...
and we did NONE OF IT.... getting held to a field goal in the 3rd quarter.
We were pressuring McNabb and held their offense to one *real* TD in the first half and that largely because of a busted coverage in the secondary (not Roy Williams-- he had short zone-- Watkins was supposed to roll over the top and didn't). So what do they do? call off the dogs and let McNabb sit back there and toss 40 and 50 yard strikes right on the numbers.
We let one get away. I deeply hope we dont regret it later.
I put this one squarely on the coaches and, if I was Drew Bledsoe, I'd have started calling my own plays.
Posted by SoaPiNuReYe (Member # 9144) on :
Bledsoe had a nice bootleg TD by the way.
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
*shhh*
The Saints are 4-1 and have Philly at home next week. From here on, though, the schedule is brutal.
And we're not blowing anyone out; close games every week.
Posted by Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy (Member # 9384) on :
How on earth is Indy 5-0??? They really struggled against the Titans yesterday, from what I understand (the game wasn't on TV here).
quote:*sigh* 13 and 3 still makes the playoffs, right?
The way things look right now, 10-6 might be good enough for a wild card...
Posted by Luet13 (Member # 9274) on :
GO BEARS!!!
They are kicking some serious butt right now. Woo hoo!
Posted by Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy (Member # 9384) on :
quote:GO BEARS!!!
They are kicking some serious butt right now. Woo hoo!
Not to mention being the only current NFC division leader to finish last season with a winning record...
Posted by Tammy (Member # 4119) on :
Stinkin Steelers! Posted by Jim-Me (Member # 6426) on :
wow... what a year this is turning into...
In the AFC, the North is all but locked up for the Ravens, with Cinci being their nearest competition 3 games back with 7 to go. The South has the Colts with a 4 game lead over Jax. Then it gets interesting. The AFC West is a dead heat with the Broncos and San Diego locked at 7-2 (and playing each other this weekend). Gotta figure the winner of that game takes the division and the loser the top wild card spot. The Patriots and Jets are in a close battle for the East. The loser of that one may figure in the hunt for the remaining wild card spot, along with the 5-4 Chiefs, 5-4 Jags, and, possibly, 4-5 Bengals.
But it's the NFC that is really interesting. The Bears own the North and probably home field advanatage. A very weak and banged up Seahawks team has managed to take a 2 game lead over the Rams as well as a head to head tie breaker with them by sweeping them, so you have to figure the West is a done deal as well.
Then you have the 6-3 Giants, who looked very strong for a long time, but have lost 8 starters and 3 of the guys who backed them up in the last 4 games. 4 of those guys are out for the season and their schedule doesn't get any easier from here. You also have the 6-3 Saints, who have been good, but have some of their toughest games ahead.
Right behind them, you have Philly, Atlanta, Carolina, and Dallas all at 5-4. Any of them could make a run, though Atlanta has been fading and Philly has a murderous 5 of their last 7 games on the road, while Dallas has a cushy 5 of the last 7 at home. Also, Dallas has a couple of very easy games (Tampa Bay on thanksgiving, Detroit at the end of the year) as well as a couple of nice schedule benefits for their tough games (Philly has to travel on Christmas for their 3rd road game in a row and the Cowboys get a 10 day mini-bye to rest up before traveling to New York).
But the really interesting thing is, apart from Dallas v. Carolina and Giants v. Falcons, which have already been played (and won by Dallas and New York,respectively), all 6 of these teams within one game of their respective division leads and struggling for the wild card spots have to play each other down the stretch.
How cool is this gonna be to watch? They could even beat each other up enough to give 4-5 teams Green Bay, St. Louis, Minnesota, or *gasp* San Francisco a shot. Though with Games @Chicago and @Green Bay in December (after having lost to both of those teams at home in their dome) I think Minnesota is done.
SI predicted that the entire NFC East would finish 9-7. I predicited the NFC South would. Both of those predictions are very close to possible, given the injuries to the Giants, the schedule of the Eagles, the inconsistency of the Cowboys, Falcons, Eagles, and Panthers, and the "they can't be that good, can they?" factor of the Saints. If the Redskins or Bucs go on a run, it just might happen. How weird would that be?
I predict that the NFC East continues to beat the NFC South and ends up sending 3 teams to the playoffs. Dallas, Philly, and New York.
But I'm a homer... I'm sure some Panther and Falcon fans see it differently.
Posted by Luet13 (Member # 9274) on :
Bears record now 9 and 1! Go BEARS! They are playing a truly awesome season so far. <----Ack! I hope I don't jinx them.
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Mad]](mad.gif)
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
![[Cool]](cool.gif)
![[Grumble]](graemlins/grumble.gif)
Redskins ![[No No]](graemlins/nono.gif)
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
I've been very impressed by the Jets so far, especially this past Sunday. Yes, they lost, but they were the only team so far that actually looked capable of beating Indy.