This is topic X Men The Last Stand (Spoilers) in forum Books, Films, Food and Culture at Hatrack River Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.hatrack.com/ubb/main/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=043128

Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Remember, spoiler laden thread!


I have to say, I fully expected Jean to die. I even fully expected, once they explained it, for the cure to only be a temporary thing.

I didn't expect them to kill Cyclops in the first 20 minutes of the movie, and rather mysteriously at that. It was such a...pointless, useless death. And we didn't even really know what happened to him until much later.

Some of the movie was satisfying, I've always sort of wanted to see an all out brawl like we saw. But at the end when Magneto more or less got his powers back, I was a little disappointed. He's already more or less out of character. The only shadow of the Magneto that I liked was when he defended Xavier to Pyro, but other than that, and when he yelled "Jean no!" as she killed Xavier, their relationship is fairly black and white, with little of the complexity from the comics or cartoon.

I was however satisfied, and not surprised when Xavier was alive at the end.

What really disappointed me about Magneto getting his powers back, is that if there is a fourth movie, he'll be the bad guy. I'd really like to see Apocalypse make an appearance. I think they've ruled out Mr. Sinister, now that Jean and Scott are dead. On the bright side of the deaths, now they can bring in more characters.

Side note, for all you looking for Gambit. The role of Gambit was offered to Josh Holloway of LOST, but he turned it down, saying Gambit was too much like Sawyer.

Thoughts?
 
Posted by pH (Member # 1350) on :
 
It's possible that Magneto won't be the bad guy if there's another movie...after all, I think the experience of being human for a while would be pretty humbling to him.

I almost cried when Xavier died. [Frown] I do think, however, that his whole position on controlling Jean's power was presented a little too harshly.

At any rate, the movie had pretty colors. [Smile]

I was annoyed that Colossus didn't have a Russian accent. I loved Juggernaut. I have no idea who that androgynous individual was supposed to be, and until that, "Ladies?" part, I was wondering if it was a really skinny chick with no hips, or a dude with boobs. It was like Michael Jackson!

I actully liked a lot of the during-fights banter. And I maintain that honestly, I can't think of anyone else who'd be better to play Beast.

Those are my random, just-woke-up thoughts.

-pH
 
Posted by pH (Member # 1350) on :
 
I also didn't get why Jean had to die...couldn't he have stabbed her with those mutant cure needles?

...and why DID she kill Scott? Not that I wasn't happy to see him die. He's annoying.

-pH
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
quote:
I was annoyed that Colossus didn't have a Russian accent. I loved Juggernaut. I have no idea who that androgynous individual was supposed to be, and until that, "Ladies?" part, I was wondering if it was a really skinny chick with no hips, or a dude with boobs. It was like Michael Jackson!
THANK YOU!

I was annoyed to no end that he didn't have a Russian accent. And I couldn't tell if that chick was really a chick or not either until he said "Ladies."

I don't care that Jean died. She died more or less the same way in the originals, so, I think most people say it coming. Scott's death was pointless. I can't imagine she'd muster the control to stop herself from killing Logan, but the Professor and Scott were fair game. Scott was the one who saved her in the original.

Also, where was Psylocke in the movie? The credits list her, but I don't remember seeing her.
 
Posted by Marlozhan (Member # 2422) on :
 
So I don't know much about the comics, but does Jean come back after being killed? And I'm assuming that Mystique will get her powers back and join the good side now. Of course, I'm not sure how much the X-men could trust her. I would doubt her motivations, since her desire to do good would be only out of revenge on Magneto. And if Magneto did become good, then she would have to be evil still [Smile]

Is it also true that they are making an X-men movie centered on Wolverine? That would be cool.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
I'm told that there is a clip after the credits that gives a hint as to the subject matter of the 4th film. Whether this indicates that it'll be Woverine centered or not I can't say, as I won't be seeing the movie until Monday.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
The clip after the credits doesn't really tell you what'll happen in a possible fourth movie. But it does open some doors.

As for a Wolverine movie, that's already greenlighted. It won't really be an Xmen movie per se, it's all about him. I'd be surprised if the X-Men were in it at all, or made anything more than a cameo.

I would say it'd be about his history as Weapon X, but they already glossed over that in the second movie, and they've gotten rid of a couple more of his bad guys since then. Maybe Omega Red? If so, I'd like to see Colossus involved in it, but I'm guessing they'd never do that.
 
Posted by Evie3217 (Member # 5426) on :
 
Oooo I didn't wait until the end of the credits. But really? A fourth movie? I thought this movie was called the last stand for a reason.

I almost cried when Xavier died as well. He was incredibly awesome, and I don't see why he had to die. I won't say anymore about the movie because I never read the comics and I don't want to be considered a noob. All in all, though, I enjoyed it thouroughly.
 
Posted by GaalDornick (Member # 8880) on :
 
"I was however satisfied, and not surprised when Xavier was alive at the end. "

What?? He was?? Or do you mean Magneto? I was so sad when Xavier died, he was so awesome. What happened at the end of the credits?
 
Posted by Marlozhan (Member # 2422) on :
 
I forget who the doctor was that found Xavier after the credits? I only caught the tail end of that post-credits clip. I walked back into the theater looking for my sister, only to see that clip playing. I felt so much better after watching it, because I was sure Xavier hadn't died. I even told my brother he wasn't dead during the movie, and I was shocked when they left him dead. But I don't know the context for that clip. That female doctor or nurse looked familiar, but I can't place her.
 
Posted by TrapperKeeper (Member # 7680) on :
 
One sure fire way to tell when a movie will be the last of the series is when its bombs at the box office and the fans don't want to see another and there is little hope of making money on a sequel.

I think we can expect sequels.
 
Posted by pH (Member # 1350) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by GaalDornick:
"I was however satisfied, and not surprised when Xavier was alive at the end. "

What?? He was?? Or do you mean Magneto? I was so sad when Xavier died, he was so awesome. What happened at the end of the credits?

Remember the part where he's talking to the students about the man in a coma, and what would happen if you put the consciousness of a father of four into it?

....yeah. "Hello, Moira..."

-pH
 
Posted by pH (Member # 1350) on :
 
While we were waiting for the movie to start, some guy in the front row got up and did PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME.

/random.

-pH
 
Posted by Enigmatic (Member # 7785) on :
 
quote:
Is it also true that they are making an X-men movie centered on Wolverine? That would be cool.
They did. It's called X-Men. It was released a few years ago. And then X2: Even More Wolverine [Roll Eyes]

--Enigmatic
 
Posted by Bella Bee (Member # 7027) on :
 
Oh, I really shouldn't have come in here. They kill Cyclops?
[Frown] He was pretty.
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
The movie dealt with a lot of important issues, almost so many that it didn't do any of them well. The most elegant, from my view, was Magneto's speech at the mutant community meeting. He was absolutely correct, btw. They can talk about citizens committees, volunteer registration and volunteer cures, then it would be volunteer immigration, then all of it would become forced as soon as there were a few mutant related human fatalities. The parallels with the Jewish organizations springing up, facilitating the Nazi solutions were striking.

Another issue that was broached was of authority. I'm reading this essay by Mortimer Adler where he makes a case for authority as distinct from tyranny. He sets freedom as submission to the right rule, and his right rule is reason, and for him, it is the primacy of reason, not unbridled choice, which constitutes freedom. He goes farther to say that that's where the authority of parents over children comes from, not biological right, but a clearer insight to reason. How does this relate to the movie you ask.

Prof. X bifurcated Jean's mind, exerting his authority over her choice, yet we are supposed to recognize Prof. X's decision as a necessary evil. That that's the evil which, to a large extent, propagates this entire mess and builds distrust is a move straight out ancient tragedy.

What do you all think about the Prof's decision to barricade Jean's mind without her input? Can his use of his authority be morally defensible. Who is to say if schizophrenia could have been avoided? And what do you think about parents sneaking kids ritalin or depressants?

[ May 26, 2006, 09:20 PM: Message edited by: Irami Osei-Frimpong ]
 
Posted by pH (Member # 1350) on :
 
I love the Professor, so I really don't want to think ill of him. Even though he isn't a real person.

I wish he was a real person. He's a nice guy.

-pH
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
Prof. X bifurcated Jean's mind, exerting his authority over her choice, yet we are supposed to recognize Prof. X's decision as a necessary evil. That that's the evil which, to a large extent, propogates this entire mess and builds distrust is a move straight out ancient tragedy.
I don't think we are, but I could be bringing some stuff from the comics over. I don't get the impression that Xavier's side is supposed to be "right" in this decision.

quote:
What do you all think about the Prof's decision to barricade Jean's mind without her input?
Horrible intrusion if that's what he did, but it's not totally clear to me that he did it without her permission. They glossed over this too quickly.
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
By the way, will anyone catch on to the fact that a good superhero series could work now? The X-Men especially - the cast is complex enough for both the season-long plotlines and short arcs within the season (see Joss Wheedon for examples). Much of what I don't like about the X-Men movies would be fixed in a well-done series.
 
Posted by pooka (Member # 5003) on :
 
Except there is this stupid bias that TV is a step down for actors. Certainly it is more hours for less pay.
 
Posted by Enigmatic (Member # 7785) on :
 
There was a crappy superhero/mutant show a few years back. I can't think of the title, but it may as well have been "Any Similiarity to the Xmen is Coincidental, Please Don't Sue Us."

--Enigmatic
 
Posted by pooka (Member # 5003) on :
 
On the whole Xavier ethics thing, his being reborn in Leech's body (if themoviespoiler is correct about the post credits clip) seems a lot more troubling than what he did to Jean. You know, I just should have gone and seen this today. Grr.

It may be that the cure wore off because Xavier infiltrated Leech. Did he do it with that intention? Does that make it more ethical? Did the Leech character seem overly like Jason from X-Men 2 or not so much?

P.S. My bad, That's the kind of crappy analysis you get from not seeing the movie. Yeah, I meant coma-man and not Leech.

[ May 27, 2006, 08:17 AM: Message edited by: pooka ]
 
Posted by pH (Member # 1350) on :
 
I didn't think he was reborn in Leech's body. I thought he was reborn in ComaMan(tm)'s body.

-pH
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
The doctor's name was Moira Mactaggart. She's a doctor on Muir Island and does mutant genetics research.

One thing I found interesting was that they more or less gave Jean as the Pheonix the powers of Proteus, who had the power to do pretty much everything his mind could imagine. The only difference being that Proteus' effects were temporary, whereas Jean's were decidedly permanant.

For anyone who didn't stay, at the end of the credits, the man in the coma looked up at Moira and said "Hello Moira" and she paused a beat and said "Charles?" In other words, heeee'ssss baaaack.

quote:
They did. It's called X-Men. It was released a few years ago. And then X2: Even More Wolverine
That's by far the thing that bothers me the most about the movies. Since when is Wolverine the main character? Certainly he's a fan favorite, but not THE main character. I've always been partial to Storm, Nightcrawler and Colossus.

Quite frankly, I'd be okay with all of them getting their own movies. There's enough side plots and side stories to sustain a dozen movies. Cyclops/Jean could have a movie dealing with Mr. Sinister. Magneto could have a half dozen movies, and hopefully they'd do a bit more character exploration to show his compassionate side, and do more on his friendship with Xavier.

Like Dag said, it would make a great television show. The show that someone mentioned above was Mutant X. It was amusingly bad. But I would love to see a live action television show of X-Men. There's enough information and background for a dozen seasons. And they could actually go into the depths of the characters that the movies leave void.
 
Posted by Hamson (Member # 7808) on :
 
Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut bitch!

I was going crazy for the rest of the movie after hearing that. Lmao. Great move.

[ May 27, 2006, 12:45 AM: Message edited by: Hamson ]
 
Posted by Destineer (Member # 821) on :
 
After seeing it I sent my friends the following email

quote:
Do not watch this movie, if you haven't already.

Just thank Bryan Singer for the first two X-Men movies and walk away while
you still can.


 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
I'd like to see someone like Joss Whedon do a fourth movie to get the whole thing back on track.

Not necessarily Whedon himself, as I'm not sure I'd like what he'd do with the dialogue, but I trust that he'd be true to the characters, and to character development, which was more or less left on the side of the road in this last movie, except for what I'd almost call a couple shout outs to character depth, the movie was wholly lacking.

Also, I think it's ironic that this same situation was faced in the original X-Men by Stan Lee (the cartoon I think). There was a "cure" invented, though in that case it was a fake cure. Rogue was to be the first to get it, because she was depressed that she could never touch another human. But in the end she decided not to get it, that she'd rather remain who she was born to be. And then Warren went and got the treatment, and became a slave of Apocalypse (perfect segue to a fourth movie ruined). But in this case Rogue faced the same test and made the opposite choice.

Though I guess it's a moot point, since everyone "cured" is only temporarily fixed.

Here's a question: Omega Red is listed as uncredited on IMDB. Where the heck was he in the movie? or Psylock? Or Siryn?
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
I liked it a ton, even where it differed from the comics.


Beast in the comics is always seeking a cure himself, and they rescued the boy whos power was to "cure" mutants of their powers, so that could still works.

I believe that while Charles made a lot of choices, Jean allowed him to do so...her powers outpaced his even as a child. She was not completely aware of her own power, but knew Xavier was helping her remain in control.

Xavier awakens in Coma man's body, as the nurse is the same I believe, and he was discussing that very thing with his class when Storm interrupted his lecture with the storm clouds.

We have yet to see how the "cure" affects mutant powers long term. I would guess that while it may be possible for mutants fo regain their powers it weakens them, perhaps for good.

Also, in the comics they make a good case for caging Pheonix, even with the moral issues raised, as left uncaged she would have destroyed the Earth. [Big Grin]

I liked how the comics dealt with Phoenix better, and liked the resolution better there as well...but I think the movie was excellent overall.
 
Posted by pH (Member # 1350) on :
 
I really want to see Nina.

Question: The tattoos...similar to Bishop's? I mean, granted he's from the future...
I just felt like we missed a lot between 2 and 3. Sentinel? Mutant in the cabinet? Mutants supposedly accepted by humanity even though a pharmaceutical company went out of its way to create a "cure?"

I want an X 2.5.

-pH
 
Posted by Puffy Treat (Member # 7210) on :
 
Parts of it had so much potential. Jean meeting Xavier and Magneto as a girl. Angel trying to amputate his wings as a little boy.

Mystique, who stole her brief scenes.

Jean's reintroduction.

Beast, who didn't get to do nearly enough.

The rest? Forgettable. If it weren't for that delightful surprise after the credits, I would've labeled this a "What If?" entry and dismissed it from my mind.

Now...I wanna see someone save this series.
 
Posted by Hamson (Member # 7808) on :
 
Now maybe it's just because I'm not extremely knowledgeable on the topic of X-men, but do you guys really think that it's that terrible of a movie? I'm led to believe that most people here think that it's not even a decent movie compared to general movie standards. I thought it was a pretty dammed good flick. Sure it could've been better; and I understand that it must be annoying for you big X-men fans out there when this might be the last one- but by normal movie standards, I think it was quite above average, even if it is a tad worse compared to X2.

Also, aren't they making a Magneto spin-off also? I think it's supposedly going to take place when he's a teenager or something.
 
Posted by Puffy Treat (Member # 7210) on :
 
I haven't read anyone say it's a terrible film.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
A Magneto spin-off from when he was a teenager?

That'd be horrible. Like Shindler's List meets the Brotherhood of Evil.

pH -

I got the feeling that the tattoos were just supposed to be a sort of mark of pride, whereas Bishop and Shard's tattoos were virtual scarlet letters, it's why they were both M's.

Puffy -

I think you've highlighted the main problem with this particular movie. Too many cooks, so to speak. They put in so many characters and possible subplots in one movie that no one issue really had a chance to seek fruition. Rogue's story got a start at the beginning, then we don't see her again until the end. Might as well of just cut her out altogether, there was enough anxiety over the cure elsewhere, and that whole "I don't want to be a mutant, it ruins my life" angle could have easily been put on any other character. Rogue was useless, which just makes it all the more pointless to have changed her character into it's child form.

I felt like Mystique was there just to be bitchy for most of it, and other than that, was just a pawn to highlight how committed and cold Magneto was when it came to his crusade.

Beast I thought had a surprisingly large role in the movie, though I would have loved to see a lot more from him.

If they do make another one, I think:

1. It should focus on a smaller amount of characters, Wolverine not being among them. He's had more than enough exploration and screen time.

2. Do a different nemesis than Magneto. Or, if they are going to do Magneto, go into his mind a bit more. He goes through different phases in his character. From genocidal "kill all the humans" to Asteroid M and just wanting to be left alone. All the while, he's Xavier's friend, they just disagree on the methods of how to achieve a basic goal: Mutant freedom/liberation. In many ways, it's the world's treatment of Xavier that fuels his anger towards the humans of the world. He's so much more complicated (and nicer to Xavier) than we're seeing on screen.

3. Consider doing a duology or trilogy that takes place in a much shorter span of time. How many years were to have elapsed between the second and third movie? Like someone said above, way too much happened in between, characters were randomly killed off and new ones added. It was jarring, and not at all seamless. They should think about a specific enemy, a specific plot with fleshed out subplots, and then break it into three pieces, instead of trying to jam three movies worth of material into one movie. Fans will be okay with seeing a 2 and a half hour X-Men movie, there's no reason they need to be so short. CGI is getting better, and cheaper, to do all the time.

I felt like especially in this last movie, it was using fantastic stuff but more or less ripping out the heart of the matter in favor of the whole "woohoo, look at the cool fights!" thing. There's a lot more to it, and I'd like to see that added back in.
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
Beast in the comics is always seeking a cure himself, and they rescued the boy whos power was to "cure" mutants of their powers, so that could still works.
In Wheedon's X-title, Wolverine threatens to kill Beast if he takes the cure - and he pretty much means it.
 
Posted by pooka (Member # 5003) on :
 
If the movies were being made for the comic book fans, the movie would be about as successful as Serenity and there would have been no sequels. The chemistry between the lead actors is what makes it a blockbuster, and so the same lead actors will dominate this and future productions. Sorry. I know I'm part of the problem.
 
Posted by Zeugma (Member # 6636) on :
 
Whee, that was fun! If it were my story, I would have had Jean kill Scott in that hoo-hah at her house, and Professor X at the big showdown at the end, before being killed in turn by Wolverine. I think that would have made the deaths a lot more dramatic and meaningful, instead of all three feeling sort of... eh. But still, it was a fun ride, and we enjoyed it.

On a side note, did anyone else's audience erupt into HUGE whoops and cheers at the Snakes on a Plane teaser?? I've never seen an audience respond like that to a trailer, ever! It was hilarious. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
quote:

I believe that while Charles made a lot of choices, Jean allowed him to do so...her powers outpaced his even as a child.

I thought that in the conversation between Wolverine and Xavier, Xavier make it clear that he did not consult Jean before erecting her blocks. The hard faced little girl at the beginning of this movie is a lot darker than the Jean Grey we've seen in the first two movies. It seems to me that Xavier didn't protect Jean from herself as much as he created two selves and kept the latter at bay.
 
Posted by Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged (Member # 7476) on :
 
Wow, I had a great time at this movie...especially Juggernauts line [Smile]


And I wasn't the only one. It made $44.5 million on it's opening night...


I'm taking my little sister and brother to see it this afternoon...I'm sure they'll enjoy it as well.
 
Posted by GaalDornick (Member # 8880) on :
 
One thing that bothered me about the fight at the end between the Brotherhood and the X-Men was how the majority of the Brotherhood mutants seemed to have no powers. All they would do is just run at the X-Men pointlessly and get stabbed by Wolverine or hit by Beast. Most of them didn't even try to fight. The X-Men really aren't that powerful, they shouldn't of been able to kill so many super-powered mutants. And some of the fighitng banter annoyed me with its corny-ness. Best and worst part of the movie was when Magneto defended Xavier to Pyro, It was nice to see Xavier be defended but Pyro was one of my facorite characters until he said that about Xavier. I thought he was just a rebellious kid, but after that I realized he's also stupid.
 
Posted by Marlozhan (Member # 2422) on :
 
Weird. People in my audience also whooped and cheered at the Snakes on a Plane teaser. As soon as the word "Snakes" appeared on screen, half the audience yelled "Snakes on a Plane!" before the rest of the title appeared. Am I missing some hype on this movie?

And from what I've gathered on this thread, Prof. X probably went into someone else's body? If so, any sequels that involve him would actually be a different actor? Or did the body he inhabit somehow turn into Professor X's body? And does this mean he will be able to walk, since he's in a different body?
 
Posted by pH (Member # 1350) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by GaalDornick:
One thing that bothered me about the fight at the end between the Brotherhood and the X-Men was how the majority of the Brotherhood mutants seemed to have no powers. All they would do is just run at the X-Men pointlessly and get stabbed by Wolverine or hit by Beast. Most of them didn't even try to fight. The X-Men really aren't that powerful, they shouldn't of been able to kill so many super-powered mutants. And some of the fighitng banter annoyed me with its corny-ness. Best and worst part of the movie was when Magneto defended Xavier to Pyro, It was nice to see Xavier be defended but Pyro was one of my facorite characters until he said that about Xavier. I thought he was just a rebellious kid, but after that I realized he's also stupid.

I think that most of the Brotherhood WEREN'T that powerful. Chick With Labret Piercing and Push-Up Bra said something along those lines at the community meeting.

-pH
 
Posted by Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged (Member # 7476) on :
 
Yeah, she said only Magneto and Pyro were lvl 3 mutants...what ever that means [Smile]

Also...the X-men train together to fight as a team...constantly....the Pawns (as Magneto calls them) have no training what so ever. Think regular grunts vs. special forces....
 
Posted by Destineer (Member # 821) on :
 
This movie completely dumped the previous two's focus on character in favor of a retarded plot.

Rogue barely appeared in the movie, when she was one of the most important and interesting characters in 1-2, and her whole thing with Bobby resolved itself in the worst possible way, entirely contrary to the whole issue of
her learning to live with her powers.

They totally ruined the whole Phoenix thing. Magneto and Jean Grey were basically there to both take on the same role in the final fight: stand around while their minions are needlessly killed by the far-weaker X-men, then tear shit up at the end when they could've done it in the first place. Also, it was ridiculous that Prof X spent about 10 seconds explaining the nature of the Phoenix, and the topic was never broached again.

Every other line was a cliche a la "We stand together."

And on a related note, there were so many contrived scenes whose only point was for the X-men to make inspirational speeches about how they shouldn't give up, when there was no reason in the first place for them to give up. "Maybe we should close the school, now that Prof X is dead." Um... why in the hell would you do that?
 
Posted by pH (Member # 1350) on :
 
Destineer, what I THOUGHT they were going to say about closing the school was that Prof X was the main source of funding...because he was.

But then you would've thought that he would, like, leave the money to the school in his will.

Also, I really wanted Bobby to cheat on Rogue. Perhaps this makes me a bad person, but I really, really wanted Bobby to cheat on Rogue.

-pH
 
Posted by Bob the Lawyer (Member # 3278) on :
 
I'm with Destineer. I may have never been so tempted to walk out of a movie before.
 
Posted by erosomniac (Member # 6834) on :
 
I thoroughly enjoyed it. Maybe it's because this movie started covering bases that I'm totally unfamiliar with in the comics, but despite the sickeningly saccharine moments and their trying to cover way, way too much ground, I enjoyed this movie more than either of the ones before it.

It's weird. In retrospect (and in reading this thread), I recognize that there were a LOT of problems with the movie, but...they just didn't bother me while I was in the theater.
 
Posted by Paul Goldner (Member # 1910) on :
 
I'm with destineer.

It was a great stupid action flick. The first two X-Men were great action flicks WITH character, plot, and thought.
 
Posted by Elmer's Glue (Member # 9313) on :
 
quote:
I also didn't get why Jean had to die...couldn't he have stabbed her with those mutant cure needles?
She would have obliterated it, or worse, hit him with it.

quote:
I can't imagine she'd muster the control to stop herself from killing Logan, but the Professor and Scott were fair game. Scott was the one who saved her in the original.

Uh... she seemed to be trying pretty hard to kill Logan, she did get down to his skeleton.
 
Posted by pH (Member # 1350) on :
 
Elmer, she would obliterate the cure, but she let Logan kill her? I don't buy it.

-pH
 
Posted by 0range7Penguin (Member # 7337) on :
 
I find myself having like a thousand things to say on this topic. First off I dont understand why so many people are saying that they didnt like this movie. I thought that considering they had a limited amount of time that they accomplished alot. THey subtitly included a lot of major characters and storylines from the comic books without making it exactly the same and outright saying things like hey this is a sentinal. They included subtitly a sentinal, the Morlocks, and im sure other things as well that i didnt pick on.

As to all that, the black woman whith the speed was Collisto the leader of a group of mutants known as the Morlocks. Then never said it but given the setting they were put in during the meeting it was clear that that group of grungy looking week mutants were the morlocks. Especially since it seemed Collisto was there leader.

As to Magnetos and Jeans roles in the final fight they made sense to me. Magneto wouldnt risk himself until he absolutely had too. He would let his "pawns" die first. And Phoenix never really seemed to care one way or another about magneto's cause she was just tagging along. SHe only engaged the fight when she herself became threatened and then she killed people on every side of the fight.

As to Logan getting to her they state that she is a level five mutant but never say what Logan is. He could be a level four or five and not have the problems Jean did because his powers are internal healing abilities not external sychic force. His healing powers were obviously powerfull enough to fight back her mental attacks.

As to the next movie i think that it will be about apocolypse for quite a few reasons. In the old storylines there is a time period where Magneto joined and even led the Xmen for a time. I believe that his turning human for a time will have softened his views and he will join the xmen not stay the nemesis.

I believe that Apocolypse will be the enemy in the next movie. THe reason I believe this is why else bring Angel into the third movie. He played a huge role in the apocolypse storyline, first as one of Apocolypses four horsemen and then loosing his wings he became Archangel.

ONe thing that pissed me off was the entrances. Beast leapt in, Collosus jumped in, Wolverine did that slide in thing, but bobby jumped in with Kitty. THat made me so made because one of the coolest things about the Ice man was his Ice slide entrance. He would come in like snowboarding on a slide of ice that he would form infront of him as he went.

Also I felt they underplayed Storms poweres in all thee movies. The closest theyve come to her full potential was in this movie when she flew above the line and struck into the enemy forces with repeated lightning attacks.

Overall I thought it was an awesome movie.
 
Posted by neo-dragon (Member # 7168) on :
 
Sorry if someone mentioned this before, but I thought I should share. Remember the part when Kitty tried to trap Juggernaut in the ground and he looked at her and said, "Don't you know who I am...? I'm the juggernaut, bitch!" A friend who I saw the movie with laughed quite hard before he even finished the line. Why? Because apparently he was the only one in the whole place who got the rather obscure reference to this: (foul language and adult themes warning)
The Juggernaut Bitch
 
Posted by pH (Member # 1350) on :
 
The dude with boobs-I mean, androgynous chick was Arclight!

-pH
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
My theater was screaming for the Snakes on a Plane trailer before it even said Snakes. We all started cheering when we heard the rattlesnake noise. I was a bit annoyed that some of my friends were more excited by the SoaP trailer than the actual movie, even after they saw it. I admit to being excited about SoaP, and that the movie wasn't exactly stellar, but it was pretty decent, even with all it's flaws.

Gaal -

I think you're a bit mistaken on the X-Men not being that powerful. Storm is arguably one of the strongest mutants on the planet when she's pissed off. Xavier tends to be fairly liberal in his recruiting, but when it comes to the actual team, he picks the most powerful from his students to be X-Men. And I agree, I loved it when Magneto defended Xavier. That was in character. Magneto is portrayed as a lot more cold and heartless in the movies than I think he is in the rest of X-Men lore.

I'm glad the movie is doing well at the box office though. There's too much story left to tell for it to die here.

Edit to add:

The line that got the biggest laugh at my theater was when Xavier was explaining how Jean survived the flood. The whole "her mind must have wrapped her body in a cocoon of telekinetic energy" or whatever was just so over the top that the whole audience busted out laughing.

I think that highlights one of the major problems with the movie: It doesn't respect the viewer. For people who've actually read the comics or seen the cartoon, what the Phoenix is and how it all works, and who all the characters are already makes sense. But for someone who doesn't already know all the background, it's awful. The explanation of the Phoenix is half-assed, and done with the expectation that the viewer will take on faith all the gibberish that Xavier spews. Angel's character is glossed over, and as far as I'm concerned looks just like either a cheap CGI trick, or an excuse to show off Ben Foster's abs.

It treats the viewer like an idiot, who doesn't deserve the respect of the filmmaker. I'm willing to take quite a bit of crap on faith in these types of movies, but this was over the top.

"What? Protective Cocoon? Well okay...wait, what happened to Cyclops? He's dead? Well okay...wait, who the hell are all these new people? And where'd Rogue go? And who is the guy with wings? And why'd Phoenix kill Xavier? What? None of the answers to those questions matter? Well I'd think that...oooh pretty lights!! CGI is fancy, I'm impressed by the shiny and the sparkly....ahhh"

It's like it was written for an audience of eight year olds.

[ May 28, 2006, 04:28 AM: Message edited by: Lyrhawn ]
 
Posted by Juxtapose (Member # 8837) on :
 
1. I'm not sure I believe Scott is dead. My rule for movies is I have to see the actual death, with eyes glazing over and the whole nine yards, or I have to see the dead body. And sometimes not even then. Jean's crazy ass saying, "oh my God, I killed him" isn't enough for me.

2. The Brotherhood clearly didn't have that many powerful mutants. I mean, when Pufferfish Man is in Magneto's inner circle, we're clearly not dealing with the creme of the crop. But I was rather dissapointed that, when they were fighting the X-men, many of the Brotherhood seemed to have no powers whatsoever.

3. On the topic of crappy mutations, I'd be interested to see a sub-plot about mutants who have all of the downside (freakish appearances, horrible weaknesses) with no powers. Is the cure permissible then?

4. They did a great job making Jean look freakin' terrifying when she was in Phoenix mode.

5. About the right number of characters, way too many living props.

6. Magneto came off in this movie to me as Hitler. As others have pointed out, it doesn't do justice to the character. Also, not even a particularly smart Hitler.

7. Kelsey Grammer was an awesome Beast. I was skeptical when I heard about it, but he fit the part very well.

8. The title should have been X Men 3: Wolverine Gets Sensitive.
 
Posted by vwiggin (Member # 926) on :
 
quote:
Yeah, she said only Magneto and Pyro were lvl 3 mutants...what ever that means
That means the special effects budget was low or the writers were too lazy to come up with good ideas. Probably both.
 
Posted by TheTick (Member # 2883) on :
 
There *are* different level mutants even in the comic books, although they use terms like alpha and omega level.
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
No, the girl in the church said that Magneto and Pyro were the only murants STRONGER than a level 3 in the whole group.

Also, Magneto said at the beginning of the batttle that he had recruited cannon fodder, basically, so it isn't suprising that most of the mutants were weak.

[ May 30, 2006, 01:22 PM: Message edited by: Kwea ]
 
Posted by vwiggin (Member # 926) on :
 
I think the difference in power levels was adequately explained in the movie. But that doesn't mean the movie wouldn't be a whole lot better if the mutant v. mutant fights (which is the bread and butter of the X-men franchise) were portrayed with more gusto and imagination.

Of course there are weak mutants with low level powers. But given the gravity of the situation, one would think Magneto would be able to attract a much better group of mutants.
 
Posted by Destineer (Member # 821) on :
 
OrangePenguin, some of us were looking for more from that movie than a cool display of various mutant powers.
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
quote:
The explanation of the Phoenix is half-assed, and done with the expectation that the viewer will take on faith all the gibberish that Xavier spews.
I don't know the comics, and I'm not sure that I care to, but I thought Xavier's explanation was adequate. The cocoon of energy bit was over the top, but come on, I'm supposed to take it on faith that Bobby can turn into a walking ice cube? It's a superhero movie, within those realms, the explanation was fine.
 
Posted by Destineer (Member # 821) on :
 
It was a fine explanation, it's just ridiculous that he gave it all in a 10-minute infodump that was never mentioned again. Especially after they went to all the trouble of having the prologue scene.

That's just bad storytelling.
 
Posted by Puffy Treat (Member # 7210) on :
 
Heh. Someone on YouTube did a new version of the X-3 teaser, only using images from "Pryde of the X-Men", the unsold pilot for an unproduced "X-Men" animated series back in 1989. It was eerie how well the soundtrack and images matched. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
X-3 posts record box office.

I'm guessing sequel.
 
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
 
quote:
It was like Michael Jackson!
No way! It was Prince! No question.

I agree with all the major complaints, but still enjoyed the movie.

I didn't see the extra scene after the credits, but I'm relieved Prof. X is alive. I also didn't see Psylocke, but noticed she was credited. Considering she was the hottest X-man in history, I think I'd have noticed her in this movie.
 
Posted by pH (Member # 1350) on :
 
JT, she was the Asian chick with the purple streaks in her hair who was with the Brotherhood.

-pH
 
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
 
Okay, she's definitely not hot enough to be Psylocke. Then again, I'm not sure there's a woman alive who's hot enough.
 
Posted by pH (Member # 1350) on :
 
Um, me. Duh. [Wink]

-pH
 
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
 
You do have boobs that you can make out with, right?
 
Posted by pH (Member # 1350) on :
 
I guess I could make out with my own boobs, but...I don't think that's really the point.

-pH
 
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
 
quote:
But I'm still a girl! I'm not one of your guy friends that just happens to have boobs that you can make out with.
>_>

<_<
 
Posted by pH (Member # 1350) on :
 
Well, why didn't you just say you wanted to make out with my boobs?

-pH
 
Posted by GaalDornick (Member # 8880) on :
 
This thread has definitely not gotten off topic. [Roll Eyes] [Wink]

Can someone who read the comics briefly explain about the comics version of Phoenix please? I thought that Phoenix was something that inhabited Jean and not Jean herself. I think I heard that somewhere.

And out of curiousity, which mutant do you think you can relate to the most?
 
Posted by pH (Member # 1350) on :
 
Which mutant in the movies, or which mutant out of all the comics?

-pH
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
************ Spoilers for the comic book ************, as we later found it happened, not as revealed in the comic book.

The X-Men were in space during a solar flare of some kind. Jean was the only person who could shield herself from the radiation and pilot the shuttle. The rest of the X-Men hid in a lined chamber to stay safe.

Jean was going to die in the shuttle when a cosmic entity known as the Phoenix made a deal: Jean would be wrapped in a cocoon at the bottom of Jamaica Bay (in NY) to heal while Phoenix took over Jean's life.

The entity everyone knew as Jean after that incident was the Phoenix impersonating Jean, a perfect copy of memories and body but still a distinct entity. The Phoenix did not retain its prior memories after the imprinting.

Gradually Phoenix/Jean became more powerful, with the template copy of Jean sometimes shutting down the Phoenix's powers when it got too scary.

At this point, Phoenix Jean is very powerful - able to demolish a car and reconstruct it, rearrange the molecules of her clothes to become her uniform, control unconscious people as puppets while still carrying on a normal conversation.

A villain known as Mastermind created an alternate life, presented as flashbacks from a prior existence, designed to release Jean's inhibitions. He does so, unleashing Dark Phoenix, a being dedicated to and overwhelmed by human sensation (something the Phoenix was not capable of before taking Jean as a template).

She beats the X-Men, rendering them unconscious, then flies under her own power to another galaxy where she devours the sun of an inhabited planet, killing billions.

She comes back to earth to defeat the X-Men once and for all, but they (with the template Jean's help) manage to set up psychic circuit breakers to dampen Phoenix's power. The empress of the galaxy where she killed the planet comes to sentence Phoenix Jean to death. The X-Men demand trial by combat, which they ultimately lose. But, when Cyclops is struck down, Phoenix is unleashed and the X-Men realize the universe is unsafe while Phoenix lives. They battle Phoenix, who ultimately takes her own life with the X-Men's help.

The part of Jean Gray which the Phoenix used as a template returned to Jean in her cocoon, who rejected it because of the horrible things she had done. That portion then flew to a clone of Jean that had been made years earlier by another villain. This clone was named Madeline Pryor, and a residue of the Phoenix force resided latent in her. Madeline meets and marries Scott Summers, who thinks Jean is really dead. Madeline and Scott have a baby, Nathan Christopher Charles Summer.

Meanwhile, Jean recovers in her cocoon. She is found by the Avengers, restored, and joins up with Cyclops, Angel, Beast, and Iceman to form X-Factor. Cyclops abandons Madeline and doesn't tell Jean he's married for a long while.

Ultimately, Madeline comes into her power and sets the X-Men against X-Factor to get revenge on Scott and Jean. Madeline dies, and the residual memories of Jean that were taken by the Phoenix finally return to Jean. She then remembers everything the Phoenix did as if she did it.

The Phoenix power itself eventually joined with Jean's daughter from an alternate timeline, Rachel. At some point she goes to the far future, where Apocalypse has taken over. The present-day Apocalypse infected Scott's sun with a techno-organic virus which was incurable. Rachel comes back to the past to take the child to the future where he can be saved.

She later takes Jean and Scott's psychic selves to the future to raise the child, who becomes Cable, a warrior who travels back in time to prevent the rise of Apocalypse and other villains.

Got that? [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
Oh, and in recent storylines (2000 +), the Phoenix is discovered to be a cosmic protector who is bound to Jean. Jean gets powers again - it's not clear if she's inhabited by the Phoenix or not - and then is killed by Magneto.
 
Posted by pH (Member # 1350) on :
 
quote:
Cyclops abandons Madeline and doesn't tell Jean he's married for a long while.
...and then Jean stabs him with a spork.

-pH
 
Posted by Puffy Treat (Member # 7210) on :
 
Morrison has said that Phoenix is the reality...Jean Grey is just the house where the goddess (his term) lives.

He also revealed that other beings around the universe have (or at least in potential alternate timelines have) become the Phoenix.

He stated in his view, the reason why Jean has "died" and come back so many times is that the Phoenix Force is like the mythical Phoenix...destroying itself only to be renewed.
 
Posted by Swampjedi (Member # 7374) on :
 
Dag, if I didn't respect your honesty, I'd say you pulled that directly out of your lower intestine. It sounds like stream of consciousness stuff.

That's pretty sad.
 
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
 
Dag is the nerdiest person on this thread. I'm a little jealous, and I'm definitely taking my huges boxes of comics with me the next time I go to my parents' house.
 
Posted by Swampjedi (Member # 7374) on :
 
I don't mean to imply Dag is sad - I think it's cool he knows that. [Big Grin] What's sad is that the storyline reads like something I'd have written at 12.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
Keep in mind that a lot of that came about because they (meaning Marvel or individual writers) kept bringing her back. First she emerged as Phoenix and had the dramatic, emotional, mythic ending. Then they brought her back again, saying oh, that wasn't really Jean. Then when they killed her off again they brought in Madeline and left it open for awhile if she was maybe Jean revived or something...

This and other "write a cool story, we'll make it make sense later" storylines is why I stopped reading X-Men around ish 175 or so and didn't pick any up again until the Ultimate series (whcih has been so-so) and Whedon's Astonishing line (which has been great, IMO, probably because it reads like he got fed up around the same time I did).
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
Just came back from seeing the movie.

Ehh.

Cool effects, lotsa fights, most everyone got a good line or two. But ultimately, ehh.

The Dark Phoenix story, before they got really stupid with it (see above), was epic. She was a dark goddess, one with full control of her abilities and uncanny insight into her previous teammates. Here, she was a supremely powerful zombie-Jean who mostly stood around unless she was having a hissy fit.

I enjoyed the movie, but I doubt I'll watch it again terribly often. Here are the things that stood out for me, pro and con:

-- I liked seeing Charles and Eric visiting the Greys. nice scene, good setup for their later differences.
-- I hated the Scott/Jean/Logan love triangle, in the previous movies and especially in this one. In the comics this was a thread, yes, but it developed over years. In the movies Wolverine has spent how much time with Jean, exactly? A few days? As much as a week? How dare Wolverine compare his loss to Scott's?
-- Scott. What a completely wasted character, in every sense of the term. He's noble, overly responsible, a master tactician, skilled with various uses of his eyeblasts, deeply in love with Jean, utterly loyal to Prof. X, and terrified that he'll hurt somebody. Mostly we saw a whiny guy who blasted things once in a while, and I have to blame that on the writers and directors.
-- Scott's death. Well, he's been relegated to supporting character, why not kill him offscreen? He'd just be in the way of this great Jean/Logan love affair anyway and we're paying Jackman more, he needs more screen time.
-- I liked Mystique, in all the movies. Seriously cool character. I was suprised, though... when she's human and spilling her guts on camera, they somehow made her look frumpy. How?
-- Disliked the sloppy editing. Here's the convoy. Here's the president. Here's the conference. Here's the convoy. Here's Cyclops on a bike. Here's the convoy. Did we need all of that?
-- Liked the Danger Room sequence. About time!
-- Why is Colossus super-strong when he's not metal?
-- Liked Kitty. Would have liked to see more Kitty/Peter interaction, or, you know, any.
-- Really liked Beast. Kelsey Grammer was perfect, both as a dignified diplomat and as a brawler.
-- Didn't see the point of Angel, alias Plot Device Boy.
-- Liked Juggernaut, and Kitty's battle with him.
-- Like the abandonment of Mystique. "She was so beautiful..."
-- Really liked Magneto's defense of Xavier.
-- In fact, liked Magneto most of the time, apart from some really stupid moves (see below).
-- Didn't like the never-before-hinted-at split personality thing for Jean. Very tacked-on feeling.
-- The Rogue-Bobby-Kitty thing? Ehh. Rogue was cooler in the last movie.
-- The big battle? Well... If Magneto can pick up the Golden Gate Bridge, why didn't he just pick up the medical facility and shake it a few times?
Why did he just stand there during the battle, when he could easily have wiped out the opposing army by himself? Or, for that matter, floated around back while the army was engaged in front? Heck, why not just drop the damn bridge on top of the place?
-- Hated the really sloppy editing. Magneto drops a bridge on the island in daylight. Then, in pitch blackness, he steps forward. Did he just stand there looking all majestic and stuff while he waited for the proper dramatic setting?
-- Liked the fastball special(s). Yay!
-- Hated the final Jean/Logan scene, mostly for the reasons above (supposed to be killed by the love of her life, not some bozo she's known for less than the life of a gallon of milk) but also because removing all the meat from Logan's bones wouldn't be that tough compared to what she was doing around him. His healing ability seems awful selective as to how fast it wants to work sometimes.
-- Wow, Storm sure is a cold bitch. Talking of killing Jean without appearing the last bit torn up about it, and hitting the other girl with lightning over and over and over...
-- "I'm the only one who can stop her!" Really? How about that bald kid that just went by? You know, the one who neutralizes mutant ability? Even if he wasn't powerful enough to stop her completely, he sure as heck could have dampened her somewhat.
-- Xavier's death, and subsequent post-credits revival. Guess he solved that pesky ethical problem, huh.
-- Magneto's powers returning. Bad enough that comics really leave a startling change actually changed. How can I feel the impact of an event when I know it'll be reversed later? Although I'd be really interested in seeing what happens if Mystique regains her powers. Would she rejoin Eric, no hard feelings? Or would he have a much more dangerous enemy?

Overall I felt the same way I feel about Smallville: cute, fun to watch, easy to heckle, but I still feel let down that so many great possibilities were ignored for an easy and shallow story. Little shoutouts to the fans are offered instead of the powerful, multi-layered love story it was drawn from. It was an entertaining summer movie, and nothing more.

[ May 29, 2006, 07:06 PM: Message edited by: Chris Bridges ]
 
Posted by kwsni (Member # 1831) on :
 
The editing bugged me too. Why do we need FOUR sweeping shots of forest? After we get into it, we really don't need the same shot to say 'we're back here now!' Why can't we just start a scene where the scene is?

And not even trying to use the kid to drain Pheonix's powers? That's a plot hole you could drive a truck through.

Ni!
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
If Magneto can pick up the Golden Gate Bridge, why didn't he just pick up the medical facility and shake it a few times?
Why did he just stand there during the battle, when he could easily have wiped out the opposing army by himself? Or, for that matter, floated around back while the army was engaged in front? Heck, why not just drop the damn bridge on top of the place?

...

"I'm the only one who can stop her!" Really? How about that bald kid that just went by? You know, the one who neutralizes mutant ability? Even if he wasn't powerful enough to stop her completely, he sure as heck could have dampened her somewhat.

Add these to the "Oh there's a damn cracking, the water temperature is in the 40s, and we've got a mutant who can make ice. Whatever shall we do?" reaction from X-2.

quote:
Would she rejoin Eric, no hard feelings? Or would he have a much more dangerous enemy?
In the comics Mystique HATES Magneto - she set up a competing brotherhood. She also worked for the government for a good long while, first in Freedom Force then in X-Factor.

I hope they go that route.
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by El JT de Spang:
Dag is the nerdiest person on this thread. I'm a little jealous, and I'm definitely taking my huges boxes of comics with me the next time I go to my parents' house.

[Big Grin]

The sad thing is that each story was usually very good once you could push aside "they're bringing her back again."

Seen all together, it's a joke.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
Which means it's time for the Armchair Director to step in!

Let the movie open as it did.
When Wolverine stops Scott and pushes on how they have to get past Jean's death, let Scott blast him a few times. Let us see that a) Scott is not handling things very well, and b) he's a powerful mutant who can take out Wolverine (as he has in the past). Afterwards, when someone makes him stop, he can say the "not everyone heals" line.
They hear of the cure, Storm does her "it's not a disease" bit, but Rogue blows up at her instead of being more or less dazed the whole movie. "At least you can touch someone, feel them touch you! Of course you like it, you're better than human. Some of us are less."
Scott hears Jean, goes to see the lake, she arises. Not as Dark Phoenix, but as SuperJean, more powerful than before.
He brings her back to the mansion, where she explains how she must have protected herself. Just before the flood hit she felt so powerful, she doesn't know why. Xavier explains to her about the shunts he placed in her mind. She's not sure how to feel about that, and neither is Scott.
Angel escapes from his father, flies to the mansion.
Magneto collects powerful mutants, let that subplot go as it was.
With Angel's information on what's goiung on, the X-Men are proactive, helping to subdue riots at the clinic and trying to track down Magneto's army. Jean is immensely powerful, and it's getting to her a bit. We see some of the wild side. Scott is deliriously happy; he has her back, we get lots of romance. Logan is a bit disgruntled and continues to flirt with her, and is surprised when she flirts back.
The Mystique rescue, as seen. Except Jean and Logan arrive to prevent it. In the battle Jean loses control and we see the Phoenix effect for the first time. Magneto and minions get away, barely. Jean jumps Logan who goes along with it until she calls herself Phoenix and he pulls away. She is confused and asks for Scott when the surviving guard shoots her with the cure. She stops it mentally and goes totally Dark Phoenix on the guard, killing him. "HOw dare you!" and so forth. She flies off.
Wolverine gets back to the mansion and fills them in.
The X-Men fly off to stop Magneto's army. Much like before except Xavier and Scott are there. Scott is yelling tactics, trying not to think about where Jean is, and Xavier is fighting Magneto with Magneto's own minions. After a grueling battle they win, except Jean shows up in full Dark Phoenix garb and takes them all out with ease. Including Xavier, whom she blasts big time (kills, if we really must). She's ready to blow the place up but Wolverine and Scott work together; Wolverine distracts her while Scott gets closer, and Scott and Jean have a moment where we can see Jean fighting to regain control. She tells Scott what he has to do while she can keep her defenses down and, screaming, he blasts her.
Epilogue - Scott has to leave for awhile. Storm takes over as leader. Keeping the school open is made easier because Angel is rich and offers to underwrite it. And life goes on.

All in all, dump some extraneous scenes and add in the fifteen minutes to make it a 2 hour movie, and this could have happened. Or something better, I'm not a screenwriter. But at the end I would have cried for Scott, I would have cared for Jean as a person, I would have felt Rogue's anguish, I would have felt Wolverine's pain at being an outsider to a relationship once again. The characters would have had some depth.

My two cents.
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
When Wolverine stops Scott and pushes on how they have to get past Jean's death, let Scott blast him a few times. Let us see that a) Scott is not handling things very well, and b) he's a powerful mutant who can take out Wolverine (as he has in the past).
Make someone have to stop Wolverine from tearing Scott apart afterward, though.

quote:
Scott is yelling tactics, trying not to think about where Jean is, and Xavier is fighting Magneto with Magneto's own minions.
Yes. They've never shown Scott as a tactician. It's the heart of his character. Otherwise he's no different from a guy with a big gun in battle.

quote:
She tells Scott what he has to do while she can keep her defenses down and, screaming, he blasts her.
Even better, have her do the eye thing holding back his power and then stop holding it back while they stare into each other's eyes.

I assume the reason they didn't have Rogue in the battle was because they couldn't think of a way for her to use her powers in it. They really needed to have her totally absorb a flying super strong near-invulnerable mutant at some point - preferably in X-2 - so she can participate in battles AND we can see the two minds in one body thing.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
One of my favorite comics was one where Scott took out all of the X-Men, one after another. He knew their weaknesses, he knew how they fight, and he's no slouch himself.
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
That said, I never liked the inconsistency of Scott being the one to teach hand-to-hand instead of Wolverine, and never liked Scott being able to take out Wolverine physically in early Claremont continuity. Before Claremont got ahold of him, Wolverine went toe-to-toe with the Hulk.

Wheedon had it right - Scott hits Wolverine with everything because he can without killing him, sends Wolverine flying out of arm's reach, and keeps pounding him from afar.

Up close, Wolverine tears him apart.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
Nod. In an earlier issue (Savage Land, maybe around the 120's?) Scott eyeblasted Wolverine against a wall and kept doing it. Same deal.

However, I wouldn't have Wolverine teach hand to hand because for the most part, he hasn't needed to know it himself. Does he even know any formal martial arts or fighting methods he could teach someone without claws? I always had the impression his moves were instinctual, animalistic. I like the way he fought in the first two movies; no real style at all, just get in there and slash until you win.

BTW - it's "Whedon," unless you're being extremely gleeful.
 
Posted by Lord Solar Macharius (Member # 7775) on :
 
Chris, I know that the production of X3 was rushed, but if you can come up with that off the top of your head, how the hell do those screen writers keep getting work? (Especially after Elektra, F4, Inspector Gadget, etc.)

I personally would have liked it if they kept the whole cure thing mysterious with rumours being that it was a mutant-derived "anti-mutation". And then it turns out to be a Sentinel production facility. The final solution to the mutant problem. But I like robots. (And short sentences.)
 
Posted by Nathan2006 (Member # 9387) on :
 
I was absolutely shocked about Rogue. She was such an interesting character in the first movie, and she took a side role with the 'kids' in the second movie, only to give up her powers. The mutant cure doesn't work, so I'm seeing Rogue kissing Iceman to his death. What absolutely shocked me the most is that she wasn't in the final battle. I thought that she would be the one, rampantly insecure about herself and the lack of control over her powers, that would stop the pheonix. Or, if not Rogue, than the bald kid would neutralize her.

I also was surprised that the phenix was more of a multible personality than a cosmic being... It would have been so interesting to see the personalities switch back and forth, and have gone in depth with the disease.

Another thing I was confused about is when Mystic gave the plans to the government... How would she know about the all-new base when she was in prison... And even if she did know, and it was prexesting information, how did Magneto know the soldiers were coming? This had so much potential for more of Mystique (A favortie of mine) To kind of do a undercover op... She wouldn't be able to change shapes, but at least she would have been in the movie... But how could she? There were so many differant characters... Angel, who was in the movie for all of two seconds, and Shadowcat, and Collosus, and Juggernaut (Who was Xavior's Half brother, wasn't he?)

Anyway, I liked it, but still, it should have been two movies, or maybe three. If not, they should have weaned out some characters... And a couple of things in responce to previous posts:

1. The 'pawns' were not weak... They were shot with the darts before they attacked the X-men Full force.

2. Storm was certainly never portrayed as weak. But I do think she should have a bigger part.

3. That one chick totally did look like prince!

4. There is a prequel in its second draft involving the wolverine... And they certianly did leave it open for a fifth movie, which would be the continuation of the first three.

5. Before 1993 (Somewhere around there) Jean Grey had been killed three times, and Scott had been killed twice... And I think that was excluding deaths in alternate universes and timestreams.

6. What is 'Peanut Butter Jelly Time?'. I have a friend who used to randomly scream it.

7. Although I always thought he was a lame character, but I was surprised that Gambit wasn't in this movie.

8. Although it was a good movie, It did have some serious plot problems, i.e. Obvious cover-ups, chilche scenes supposed to be I guess 'moving.'
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
quote:
Does he even know any formal martial arts or fighting methods he could teach someone without claws?
Thanks to Claremont, Wolverine knows everything. He's a master samurai, a helicopter pilot, a sushi chef, and a salad shooter.
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
Before 1993 (Somewhere around there) Jean Grey had been killed three times, and Scott had been killed twice... And I think that was excluding deaths in alternate universes and timestreams.
The first "death" lasted one issue - the shuttle going down, the X-Men coming up, Jean staying down.

On the first page of the next issue, she rises up from the water as Phoenix.

The second death was during the trial by combat.

What was the third prior to 1993?
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
Couldn't a person wear armor made from the same stuff as the lenses of Scott's glasses and be completely immune to his energy-based attacks?
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
quote:
Couldn't a person wear armor made from the same stuff as the lenses of Scott's glasses and be completely immune to his energy-based attacks?
Yes.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
Point of order. Frank Miller made Wolverine a samurai.
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
Good point. Although, in my defense, Frank Miller makes everyone a samurai. Or a prostitute. Except for the samurai prostitutes

The only thing I'm finding interesting right now about his current take on Batman, in fact, is how it -- perhaps deliberately, perhaps not -- throws into sharp relief how incredibly distorted, violent, and inhuman his caricatured stereotypes usually are.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
I'm having the same reaction these days to Brian Michael Bendis that I did to Frank Miller back in the day: amazement at the fresh look he brings to the table, wonder at how he reinvents heroes while still bringing their essence into sharp relief, and ultimately annoyance because he keeps doing the same thing, over and over, and it ain't fresh anymore.
 
Posted by kwsni (Member # 1831) on :
 
::hugs geeks::

Ni!
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
You know, though, I still find Powers and Ultimate Spider-Man fresh and interesting, and Alias and Pulse were solid until Cage got shoehorned into the Avengers. And until they manage to somehow retcon it all away and transform it into the status quo, what he did to Daredevil will remain one of my favorite comic arcs ever.

As long as Powers still manages to rock my world on a regular basis, though, and Spider-Man and Kitty Pryde are somehow written as a believable couple, I'll forgive Bendis almost anything. Provided they never let him anywhere near Iron Man and Wolverine, ever again. Those are two characters who simply don't hold up to comic deconstruction. [Smile]
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
Actually, while I'm on the topic of Frank Miller: just what is he doing, do you think? Is he deliberately sabotaging/reinventing the character, or has he always envisioned Batman as a semi-psychotic nutcase who'd force a young, traumatized child to eat rats in order to teach that child to be self-reliant? Yeah, Alfred has always been the voice of reason, and it's nice to see that he's still being written that way -- but when the voice of reason is preventing Batman from mentally abusing an orphan, is that really where the line is now drawn?

It's as if Ultimate Spider-Man turned Aunt May into Norma Bates.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
What's really sad is Bobby Drake wasn't done half as well as the guy from The Incredibles.
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Chris Bridges:
Point of order. Frank Miller made Wolverine a samurai.

Technically, Miller only drew Wolverine as a Samurai. Claremont wrote him that way.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
And yup, you pegged my thoughts on Bendis nicely. Those are exactly the books I still buy. So far I'm liking what the next Daredevil writer is doing, as well.

And Miller always thought of Batman as a psychotic vigilante, I think. But when he wrote Dark Knight you could imagine this was a Batman who had been through a lot. This is a younger, fresher Batman and the craziness doesn't work as well for me. I just flip through for the cheesecake.
 
Posted by Nathan2006 (Member # 9387) on :
 
quote:
The first "death" lasted one issue - the shuttle going down, the X-Men coming up, Jean staying down.

On the first page of the next issue, she rises up from the water as Phoenix.

The second death was during the trial by combat.

What was the third prior to 1993?

I'm not quite sure... I know that Marvel had two seperate comic series devoted to the X-men... I'm not quite sure when the first one ended and the second one started... They may have been going on at the same time. In any case, it was in the first series that Jean had died three times and Scott Two.
 
Posted by Juxtapose (Member # 8837) on :
 
quote:
Why is Colossus super-strong when he's not metal?
While I haven't read much of the comics (this is my failing, please forgive me) I DID collect many hundreds - or thousands - of the trading cards. It always seemed to me that Colossus, while super strong in metallic mode (a strength level of 5, I believe on the 1-7 scale) was still above average strength in normal mode (say a three). Surely strong enough to carry a largish TV one-armed. As opposed to, say, Galactus, or The Watcher, who was a seven in damn near everything.
[/pseudo-geekiness]
 
Posted by Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged (Member # 7476) on :
 
<Geek mode>

Didn't half the universe die in the crossover event...the Infinity Gauntlet?...that makes %50 percent odds Jean died


</Geek mode>
 
Posted by The Pixiest (Member # 1863) on :
 
Chris, would you write the next X-Men movie? PLEASE?????????

Whenever my hubby and I saw X-Men previews on TV, and we saw The Juggernaut, either or both of us would say "I'm the Juggernaut, BITCH!" so when that part of the movie rolled around and he actually said it we missed the next 5 minutes of the movie because we... alone, out of the entire packed theatre... were laughing hysterically.

That androygenous woman was definately Prince. In fact, that's what we called her after the movie "What was the deal with Prince and her shockwave? That wasn't developed well."

I thought it was a plot hole that Magneto ripped up the GG bridge and moved it to alcatraz. He could have taken one of the mothball fleet or even a big metal plate to get everyone over there. Then I decided it was good for intimitdation factor.

I was bummed there wasn't more Rogue. She was my fav in the first movie. (her and Wolverine)

We left before the end of the credits and missed Xavier coming back to life =(

Pix
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
Who was the woman attending to Mr. Brainstem in the post credits clip? She and Xavier were on a first name basis, but I wasn't sure who she was.
 
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
 
Moira MacTaggart.

Ahem, I mean Moira MacTaggart.

Sidenote: Did anyone else catch R. Lee Ermey's voice when the troops were outfitting themselves before the final battle?
 
Posted by jeniwren (Member # 2002) on :
 
Well, darnit, we didn't stay until the end of the credits. Have to go see it again, I guess. [Smile]

I took my son last night to see it and we both loved it. I know just enough XMen comic history to get some of the injokes, so I really enjoyed that, but haven't read any of them in so long that any of the liberties they took in character development didn't bother me. I really liked Magneto's comment to Pyro defending Prof X. I figured the cure couldnt' be permanent, but it was okay that it was predictable. I didn't particularly like the golden gate bridge scene, figuring it was a ridiculously ostentatious way to get to Alcatraz. It did, however, make me laugh out loud, so I guess you could classify it as entertaining.

Overall, loved it and would like to see it again.
 
Posted by Robin Kaczmarczyk (Member # 9067) on :
 
Just watched this movie last night.

Although the action was interesting, and visually stunning, I was not amused. There is a reason why we create art. Stories usually have a moral. There's a reson why we tell stories. There is something more to a story than paying $10 for a movie ticket.

I found no such thing here. It was like eating cotton candy, all air. Smoke and mirrors.

What is the purpose of a film like this? To lead kids to believe that the best response to violence is more violence? More militaristic meat-grinding for the brain?

Exactly my problem with Star Wars.

At least the DaVinci code asked some interesting questions. The DaVinci code was a far 'inferior' film in suspence and action, but it was more nurishing intellectually, maybe even spiritually.

Hollywood is still trying to tell us that everything is okay, and the buiness can be conducted as usual with their violent pornography (i consider death as entertainment a form of death-porn).

BTW. I rooted for Magnetto the whole film.
 
Posted by GaalDornick (Member # 8880) on :
 
Wouldn't rooting for Magneto sort of contradict what you just said you were against? I mean "the best response to violence is more violence" is more or less what Magneto was for, IMO. It seemed by the way you worded that sentence that you are against that view. So why exactly did you root for Magneto? Did you just not care about his views and just liked him as a character?
 
Posted by Farmgirl (Member # 5567) on :
 
Although this is supposed to be "The Last Stand", there will obviously be more. IMDB already reports that there will be one called Magneto in 2007, which looks to be a flashback type to younger year; and Wolverine in 2007, written by none other than David Benioff, who is also supposed to be doing Ender's Game in 2008
 
Posted by Hamson (Member # 7808) on :
 
quote:
Plot Outline: A young Magneto seeks revenge on the Nazis who killed his family while befriending a young Charles Xavier.
Ah ha! I was correct!
 
Posted by blacwolve (Member # 2972) on :
 
Ok, I just thought of something. If Jean's so freaking strong and Magneto knows she's that strong then why didn't Magneto use her to power his mutant making machine in the first movie.

For that matter, Magneto thinks it's reprehensible that the humans want to turn all of the mutants human, but alright for him to turn all of the humans mutant? I just realized that this movie's plot is practically the polar opposite of the first movie's plot.
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
Magneto feels it is him or them, and they were moving against mutants first.

And it wasn't just power that moved the machine in the first one, it was HIS power of mastery of metals....and Rogue was the only mutant capable of taking his powers.

Also, Jean wasn't powerful anymore, due to Xavier's work with Jean to partition her powers.
 
Posted by Shanna (Member # 7900) on :
 
I found the turn-humans-mutant thing to be very odd in the other movie. While I think this movie eliminated the delicate complexities of the character, I more easily imagine Magneto viewing mutation as a rare and superior club than a fix to the infortunate human state, and so this movie was more on par than the other.

I think the cliched dialogue and character "development" bothered me most about this movie. It was alot of fun and it had moments where I was more than pleasantly surprised, but I still feel like the X-Men universe isn't being treated with respect. The one-liners are great when said by the right character (I particularly enjoy them from Wolverine), they seemed to be coming left and right which made it impossible for me to enjoy them. There just weren't distinctive voices for the characters. Magneto wasn't treated like a person so much as a cardboard cutout for the "humans are bad" story objective. There's nothing interesting about Storm, they might as well cut Rogue out for all the lines she had, and everyone else was one plot device after another.

I was excited to see Angel (especially since I remember little Ben Foster when I was growing up) but he had no purpose. I had to explain to my poor dad who Kitty Pryde was since neither of us remember anyone actually saying "Shadowcat." Juggernaut is very cool but he seemed included only as a way to highlight how Kitty and her powers could earn her a spot on their little X-Men team. The helmet "explanation" did not do it for me.

I couldn't be more annoyed with the Bridge scene if I tried and all for reasons that others have noticed as well.

Oh, and I hate the Logan/Jean/Scott love triangle. Since when is Wolverine a 12 year old girl??

And with main characters being killed and cured left and right...I had some Serenity flashbacks. I seriously was not expecting Scott and Xavier to bite it. Or Mystique to be cured. Thank goodness atleast that is being undone or I wouldn't know what to do with myself.

To bring back Scott and Jean in another movie in any way, shape or form, would be a cheap out. And as much as I do not miss the actors or their characters, I can't imagine anyone making future films without them.

All the papers and my family have agreed on one thing...this movie needed Nightcrawler and his voice and perspective.
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
I missed him for sure, although I enjoyed the film. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Lalo (Member # 3772) on :
 
Whoa.

Why is it so difficult for directors to understand that Magneto isn't a villain?
 
Posted by 0range7Penguin (Member # 7337) on :
 
I just still in shock over the fact that there were three X men movies and no Gambit. He was always my favorite X man. Period.
 
Posted by Juxtapose (Member # 8837) on :
 
Magneto is a villain. He's just much more complex than the way he was portrayed. It's why I think so many people liked his defense of Xavier. It was a brief look into that comlexity.

He's not a villain in the "I'm gonna destroy the world" kind of way, but who really is?
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lalo:
Whoa.

Why is it so difficult for directors to understand that Magneto isn't a villain?

Depends on when in the continuity you look. Prior to God Loves, Man Kills, he was almost always portrayed as a villain.

After that, he became a "good" guy for a long time. But, ultimately, he reverted to his villainous ways. He's destroyed cities - a deserted Russian city and a populated NYC - enslaved humans, and caused thousands of deaths in an instant a global magnetic pulse.
 
Posted by Tristan (Member # 1670) on :
 
OK, I saw the movie yesterday, and I must admit I didn't pick up on the fact that the "cure" was temporary. Sure, in terms of sequels, etc., it makes sense. There's no way they were going to let characters like Rogue, Mystique and Magneto remain powerless. But for it being explained in the film, I must have blinked. Did Magneto move the chess pieces with his mind in the last scene? To me it looked like he was extending his finger towards the king, which I took as him symbolically admitting defeat against the absent Xavier. Did I miss something?
 
Posted by Juxtapose (Member # 8837) on :
 
I think your interpretation is what they were trying to lead the audience to believe. Just before his hand touches the king, it rocks back and forth slightly. It was definitely the kind of thing you could miss if you blinked.
 
Posted by Robin Kaczmarczyk (Member # 9067) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by GaalDornick:
Wouldn't rooting for Magneto sort of contradict what you just said you were against? I mean "the best response to violence is more violence" is more or less what Magneto was for, IMO. It seemed by the way you worded that sentence that you are against that view. So why exactly did you root for Magneto? Did you just not care about his views and just liked him as a character?

Well, it was just choosing between a bunch of killers rooting for humanity and a bunch of killers rooting for mutants.
 
Posted by Lalo (Member # 3772) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dagonee:
quote:
Originally posted by Lalo:
Whoa.

Why is it so difficult for directors to understand that Magneto isn't a villain?

Depends on when in the continuity you look. Prior to God Loves, Man Kills, he was almost always portrayed as a villain.

After that, he became a "good" guy for a long time. But, ultimately, he reverted to his villainous ways. He's destroyed cities - a deserted Russian city and a populated NYC - enslaved humans, and caused thousands of deaths in an instant a global magnetic pulse.

He was originally presented as a cornball villain, but he's become such a deeper character than that. I'd call him an antihero -- and lord, I wish Ratner had the insight to present him as one. That's the key element which made X2 a success, I think -- Singer presented Magneto as a victim of persecution, striking back. Ratner made him just some reactionary one-man lynch mob.

He's my favorite character. I wish he'd been done justice.
 
Posted by Shanna (Member # 7900) on :
 
Bingo Lalo! I couldn't agree more.

Even villians need motivation, and I just didn't feel it in this one like I did in the others.
 
Posted by Rakeesh (Member # 2001) on :
 
As for Magneto getting his powers back, I thought as soon as he was injected, "Were those loaded vials?" And then when he got his powers back I thought, "They weren't loaded. Or else diluted or something."

I can imagine Magneto, after seeing his best friend (assuming he has friends aside from Xavier) Mystique get neutered (more or less) by the cure would be too shocked, too horrified, to test his abilities right then and there.

I'm sorry, but when did Storm get so stupid? Hey, let's fight the femme-Flash in hand-to-hand combat! Or wait, why not, say, throw up some mist or a gale force wind to blind/knock her down, get some air and then ZAP! For instance.

The idea that the government would keep nearly a half-dozen of the most wanted and two of the most dangerous mutants (well, beings anyway, counting Juggernaut) in the same metal trailer with the same metal escort vehicles with Magneto out and about is totally ridiculous.

I enjoyed it, but it did not go much further in my opinion than action flick. For instance, seeing as how the film was so Wolverine-focused, they missed a BIG opportunity fleshing out both him and Jean by pointing out that if anyone's got empathy for Jean Grey / Phoenix, it's Logan / Wolverine. With his long-term mind raping and conditioning, he is essentially Jean Grey/Phoenix but not as tough and without the psychic abilities.
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Shanna:
Bingo Lalo! I couldn't agree more.

Even villians need motivation, and I just didn't feel it in this one like I did in the others.

Um, at the end of the last movie, he tried to kill every single human being on the planet. I think his motivation was well-established here.
 
Posted by Bella Bee (Member # 7027) on :
 
I went to see it last night, and… um. Did anyone else get the impression that the writers had seen the Star Wars movie last summer and really like it? Because I found the ‘tragedy’ in this movie as hilarious as I did in Star Wars.

I mean, who can seriously not look at a couple of gravestones with big Xs on them, and not go to an ‘because they’ re ex-men , get it? Bada boom ching!’ place? Plus, there was a ‘Noooooo’. Why do they always have to do that? It always makes me giggle when I want to be heartbroken. And that last scene with Wolverine and Jean came off wrong. Yes, I know he’s about to kill her, but the way he says ‘I love you’ just, for some reason didn’t come off right at all. Reshoot it and make sound genuine, ie not like a robot repeating a cliché and maybe I’ll cry.

So the ending was ruined for me. Once again, something that could have been painful and wonderful ended up vaguely funny. And this time the whole theatre were laughing, not just us.
I didn’t pay to see a comedy.

And is it only me who doesn’t care that Prof. X is coming back if Patrick Stewart isn’t? Okay, I do care, but I care less.

I’m a little disappointed. But most of the rest of it was alright. I just hope this doesn't bode badly for 'Pirates of the Caribbean' because if both the blockbusters I've been looking forward to end up lame, I really will cry.
 
Posted by starLisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 0range7Penguin:
I just still in shock over the fact that there were three X men movies and no Gambit. He was always my favorite X man. Period.

They wanted Josh Holloway (Sawyer from Lost) to play Gambit in this one. He didn't want to, because it would have been so similar to his character on Lost. But they didn't recast the part, because they were still hoping till the last that he'd agree to do a cameo. Which he didn't.

I want to see just Charles, Jean, Scott, Hank, Warren and Bobby, and I want the last four of them in yellow spandex. That's the X-Men I remember. Everything post Dazzler is tripe.

PS: Am I the only one who noticed that this last movie was one long metaphor for the whole "curing gays" movement? "There's nothing wrong with you!" Etc. I mean, they did it before, when Bobby's mother asked him, "Have you tried not being a mutant?" But this whole movie was like a dramatization of the "magic pill" question.
 
Posted by Anna (Member # 2582) on :
 
SL, I noticed that too - the "tried not being a mutant" line in the last movie made me laugh out loud, actually.
 
Posted by the_Somalian (Member # 6688) on :
 
I was going to make a thread about this subject but I might as well as post it here as it is relevant to the movie in question...

Killing off major characters: a big cliche?


It seems to me that death of a major character is used by writers in place of actual storytelling.

Need something big and awfully dramatic to happen?

Kill off a character!

Need something shocking to happen?

Kill off a character!

I saw "X-men 3" over the weekend and (spoiler, folks) every single death in that movie struck me as pointless. Maybe "shocking" but hardly tragic.

Jean dying--what a waste. Just as she was coming into her true formidable self and blossoming into this seemingly unstoppable force--she gets it! [Frown]

I'm more saddened by the wasted opportunities than by any tragedy inherent in her demise.

As for the two other characters, theirs is a case of "there's nothing more they can show us so we might as well kill them off..."

In fact the one character I was sure was going to die--didn't! I'm talking about Rogue's romantic rival. She seemed so fragile amidst all the fighting that I thought: If the X-men are to lose anybody because of this battle it should be her. But no. She lived.

On a side note, I can't believe movie cost 200 million dollars. Where did all the money go????
 
Posted by Anna (Member # 2582) on :
 
Special effects.
 
Posted by The Pixiest (Member # 1863) on :
 
Lisa: All three movies were "gay" movies like that. Yes, we don't have super powers, but our social issues are the same.

Imagine, in the first movie, if Magneto's super weapon was to turn all the world leaders gay.

*sigh*

Sometimes it's hard not to pull for Magneto...
 
Posted by Anna (Member # 2582) on :
 
That would be awful - I don't care to feel sexually attracted to men or women, but to not feel sexually attracted to the person I love would be horrible.
 
Posted by pH (Member # 1350) on :
 
If they'd thrown in a mutant marriage amendment, it would have been priceless.

"Marriage should be between a human and a human! Mutant marriage is an abomination in the eyes of God!"

-pH
 
Posted by The Pixiest (Member # 1863) on :
 
Anna: Unless you know and accept from an early age, I think most gay people go through a "death of dreams" as I call it when we finally accept who we are. "No, I'll never have the white wedding." "No, this person I'm with, love them platonically as I might, is not the love of my life." "No, I'll never have kids that are half me, half the person I love."

And being "cured" would cause the same thing in reverse. The death of all your new dreams.
 
Posted by Anna (Member # 2582) on :
 
Which is why I never thought gay people should be cured. Neither straight people. Answer to intolerance with more intolerance is probably not a good idea, however tempting it may be.
 
Posted by The Pixiest (Member # 1863) on :
 
Anna: That's why Magneto, understandable as he is, is still the villan.
 
Posted by Anna (Member # 2582) on :
 
Yes. Isn't it better when you can understand the villain's motivation? I think it makes the movie more interesting.
 
Posted by The Pixiest (Member # 1863) on :
 
That's why Magneto is a great villain =)
 
Posted by Anna (Member # 2582) on :
 
Snape too, for the same reasons.
 
Posted by starLisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Anna:
That would be awful - I don't care to feel sexually attracted to men or women, but to not feel sexually attracted to the person I love would be horrible.

That's pretty much what a lot of people want for those of us who are gay, though. I wonder if there's some way to get them to understand that what you just said is exactly how we feel.
 
Posted by Anna (Member # 2582) on :
 
I wonder that too. It would be a better world if we understood each other better.
 
Posted by TrapperKeeper (Member # 7680) on :
 
star, I think you're just seeing things in the movie and relating them to your personal experience. The writers did not set out to metaphorically compare the mutants to gays. They were just trying to make a good movie. The same could be said for any group that potentially feels outcast or different from the norm.

The similarity is there sure, but it was not deliberate. The writers were not smart enough to close some major holes in the plot as has been explained above by a few people. I loved the movie, but there were some stupid parts such as putting all those dangerous mutants together in one semi (metal) while magneto was on the loose. Also magneto can rip the golden gate bridge from its foundation and carry it across the bay, but when he gets to the building he chooses to toss compact cars. These guys aren't making social commentary, they are doing an entertaining movie.
 
Posted by pH (Member # 1350) on :
 
Personally, I will find social commentary wherever I see fit.

The Chronicles of Riddick is obviously a critique of Americans' (Necromongers) actions toward the Middle East (New Mecca).

Also, everyone knows that we initiate people into our society by stabbing them through the necks with metal bars. I mean, duh.

-pH
 
Posted by starLisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by TrapperKeeper:
star, I think you're just seeing things in the movie and relating them to your personal experience. The writers did not set out to metaphorically compare the mutants to gays.

Oh, please. They consciously put in things that carried that metaphor. "Have you tried not being a mutant" is clearly a reference to all the parents who've asked the same thing of their gay children.

I'm not reading anything into it. The fact that you don't see it only indicates that it's not something you've ever had to deal with. Live and learn.
 
Posted by katharina (Member # 827) on :
 
I do think the otherness of the mutants in X-Men is deliberately a metaphor for being gay.

I do not, however, think that the otherness of Harry Potter and the non-Muggles in a Muggle world is a metaphor for being gay, and I have seen that argument made.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
I think the otherness is a deliberate metaphor for being gay. I don't think that's the only metaphor, though. It also applies to anything that separates you from the majority - personality, tastes, interests, abilities - and is one of the reasons the X-Men has lasted this long. Most of us can understand what it's like to be outcast, if not actively legislated against.
 
Posted by Sterling (Member # 8096) on :
 
I saw the movie last night with my wife. I was moderately entertained, but not astounded. We spent a lot more time afterward talking about inplausibilities and flaws than about good things.

It reminded me a bit of The Phantom Menace: if you just go to see Jedi do Cool Jedi Things(tm), you'll probably be modestly entertained. If you expect solid characters making choices built around their personalities rather than swayed by the demands of the plot, you'll be disappointed. (Insert "mutant" in the place of "jedi" in the first sentence.)

Kelsey Grammer made a fine Beast. Magneto's defense of Xavier to Pyro was a good moment. The special effects were good (particularly those associated with Phoenix- she was convincingly scary); as ridiculous as the whole Golden Gate Bridge segment was, in a theater with a good sound system, it was impressive. *BOOM* <rattle rattle rattle rattle>
Jackman, for all that they didn't use him all that well, is still fun to watch as Wolverine. Ditto Romjim and Mystique. Stewart and McKellan are always fun to watch, though for the first time they seemed wasted on the material they were given.

I miss Nightcrawler. Alan Cumming did a fantastic job, and N's always been my favorite. Apparently X-Men: The Game of the Movie (what a title, jeesh!) provides some backstory as to why Nightcrawler isn't in this one. (I don't want to know. If they killed him off, I'll be pissed.)

More, I miss Bryan Singer. This movie killed off characters left and right, left others offscreen for long stretches, and still couldn't get as much character development from the remaining ones' time as Singer got from that one shot in X-Men II of Pyro looking at Bobby's family photos.

They could probably have done better if they'd spent more time on the characters, but instead we get special effects and Wolverine fighting. I love Wolverine as much as the next geek, but we know he's a good fighter, we've seen two movies that make that point quite eloquently, and for the sake of getting to watch him fight we leave characters like Colossus absolutely void of development.

And Rogue- Argh! I love Paquin's Rogue. I know my friends who are more deeply invested in the comic than I don't, but I think the vulnerability she's given the character is terrific. And the "choice" she made, which they barely give any time to, is stupid.

Girl, what are you gonna do with yourself when Bobby leaves you anyway?!

(excuse me. channeling my inner black woman.)

Holloway would have made a fantastic Gambit. I would have loved to see that, but not in this movie. This movie wasted enough characters as it was.

My wife's theory regarding the Wolverine/Phoenix ending is that when Phoenix gets in that state, everything around her just goes kablooie without any particular focus on any single thing; thus, Wolverine was able to approach. I don't know if I buy it, but if it was more selective, she sure as hell ought to have been able to push Wolvie away from her as easily as Magneto, rather than trying the slow disintegrate thing.

With all respect to lovers of the comic, the strength of the movies (up to this one) was the extent to which it shied away from some comic book conventions in an attempt to put these characters into something resembling the real world, or at least treat them with more subtlety. I particularly enjoyed the comment about yellow spandex in the first movie, and the constant interruptions in the second of Wagner's attempts to dramatically announce his nickname. These aren't the X-Men who do regular forays into space and get buffeted by cosmic anomalies and face universe-destroying demigods. This movie tended more towards comic-book levels of overkill, and I think it suffered for it.

Okay, that's all my venting for the moment.
 
Posted by blacwolve (Member # 2972) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bella Bee:


And is it only me who doesn’t care that Prof. X is coming back if Patrick Stewart isn’t? Okay, I do care, but I care less.

I’m a little disappointed. But most of the rest of it was alright. I just hope this doesn't bode badly for 'Pirates of the Caribbean' because if both the blockbusters I've been looking forward to end up lame, I really will cry.

I don't care if Prof X is coming back if Patrick Stewart isn't. Patrick Stewart made him cool.


The Pirates of the Caribbean trailer was before X-Men. I haven't really been looking forward to it, but it the first few minutes I got really hopeful and thought it might actually be worth seeing. But then the trailer didn't end. It just kept going, introducing more and more plot points. By the end I was back to not wanting to see it again.

Why can't directors realize that to make a really good movie they only need one cool idea?
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Chris Bridges:
I think the otherness is a deliberate metaphor for being gay. I don't think that's the only metaphor, though. It also applies to anything that separates you from the majority - personality, tastes, interests, abilities - and is one of the reasons the X-Men has lasted this long. Most of us can understand what it's like to be outcast, if not actively legislated against.

Originally (Stan Lee originally) it was a metaphor for racial discrimination.

There's almost no way all the questions and phrases in the movie were used without being conscious allusions to things said to or by gay people.
 
Posted by Bella Bee (Member # 7027) on :
 
I agree with Dagonee. But on a less blatantly obvious level, it also works for fat people who are happy with themselves, or people who consider their disabilities to be an important part of who they are. I read a story in my local paper this weekend about a blind girl who has decided to turn down an operation to restore her sight because she's hoping to qualify for the disabled Olympics.
 
Posted by Nathan2006 (Member # 9387) on :
 
Somebody said that storm got stupid Fighting Callipso, or whatever her name was... the super fast chick.

Anyway, Storm's powers take time and concentration, and they leave her open to attack, especially from a super fast chick.
 
Posted by Lalo (Member # 3772) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dagonee:
quote:
Originally posted by Shanna:
Bingo Lalo! I couldn't agree more.

Even villians need motivation, and I just didn't feel it in this one like I did in the others.

Um, at the end of the last movie, he tried to kill every single human being on the planet. I think his motivation was well-established here.
Not really. Think back to the last movie -- the government struck first, trying to destroy every mutant alive. Magneto said as much before he re-aimed Xavier -- paraphrased, "it looks like they're not playing by your rules. Maybe it's time we played by theirs."

He was noble, the defining characteristic of his personality, his mission, and his goals. He wants to save mutantkind, not destroy humankind -- unfortunately, the only way he sees to protect his people is to fight back against those he sees bent on destroying them. This is crucial, this understanding that Magneto's a savior, not a demon. A misguided saint, not a diabolical villain. He should be able to present a case you know in your heart of hearts is wrong, but offered with such overwhelming proof of our evils that you wonder, well, maybe humankind should be destroyed. How else will mutants ever live in peace and safety?

Ratner destroyed that. Rothman destroyed that. Even Singer screwed it up in the first movie, to a lesser degree. I don't see why it's so damnably hard for directors to understand that, to make a good movie, you don't have a villain.

The same goes for this upcoming crap with Singer. I have faith in him for the X-movies, but it looks like he's derived too much from the previous Superman films -- designing Luthor after Gene Hackman?! Superman could be a great story, but not if Singer makes it something as trite and boring as good-guy-stops-bad-guy. And from the trailer, it looks like that's exactly what the plot will be.

[/rant]
 
Posted by Enigmatic (Member # 7785) on :
 
Lalo, you remind me of an actor quote, I'm pretty sure it was Gary Oldman. An interview asked something about playing a good guy for a change since he's well known for his villains. He answered:

"There's no difference, really. Everyone thinks they're righteous."

Which is a great insight into why he plays such compelling "villains."

--Enigmatic
 
Posted by Lalo (Member # 3772) on :
 
Werd. Nobody ever twiddles their greased mustache in delight at the thought of a virgin being crushed by a freight train -- and to make a movie of it smacks of Republican propaganda.

What people seem to keep forgetting is that Eric Lensherr suffered through the Holocaust. He's fighting for the Jews; not becoming a Nazi. That makes all the difference.
 
Posted by starLisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by katharina:
I do think the otherness of the mutants in X-Men is deliberately a metaphor for being gay.

I do not, however, think that the otherness of Harry Potter and the non-Muggles in a Muggle world is a metaphor for being gay, and I have seen that argument made.

I agree with you. I don't see that at all.
 
Posted by starLisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
Jews wouldn't be willing to kill every non-Jew in the world, the way Lensherr was willing to kill every non-mutant. He may have started out the way you suggest, but he's gone far beyond that.
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
Which is why he's a comic book villain. [Smile]
 
Posted by Rakeesh (Member # 2001) on :
 
In Magneto's own words, mutants are the cure, not the disease, Eddie. Which is a mirror image of the evil portions of humanity's thinking in the film as well. He thought that before humanity (well, only a small segment acting on its own) attempted to obliterate all mutants, and he thought it afterwards.

In fact he almost certainly thought it all the way back to his childhood in the Holocaust, when the horrors of Nazi brutality more or less ruined him as a good person.

Just because he is not a mustache-twirling black tophat wearing caricature does not mean he isn't a villain. Just because, as Gary Oldman says, everyone thinks they're righteous does not mean everyone possesses righteousness to a substantial degree.

Magneto was a racist, pure and simple. His race was superior, and the other race-humanity-was inferior, and individual humans were just as culpable for the crimes of the worst humans as were those human criminals or evil bastards themselves.

You can be provoked and still be evil. He was not noble, he was arrogant, prideful, uncompromising. It was his vision, or death. Or at best, submission and slavery. Just because he took pride in that does not make him noble, or a saint of any stripe.
 
Posted by Lalo (Member # 3772) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by starLisa:
Jews wouldn't be willing to kill every non-Jew in the world, the way Lensherr was willing to kill every non-mutant. He may have started out the way you suggest, but he's gone far beyond that.

Except he's not killing every non-Jew -- he's killing every Nazi, to maintain the analogy. Humans hate and murder mutants, just as Nazis did Jews. This is where the philosophies of Xavier and Lensherr come into play: Magneto believes humankind is irredeemable, and doomed to forever persecute the weak or helpless they have in their power. Xavier's more of a Christlike figure, and believes there is grace in humanity, the ability to accept the strange and love the different. This is a fight we've witnessed for how many centuries between how many philosophers -- and I would love for anyone to prove most of history wrong and challenge Magneto's views.

Magneto doesn't see his fight so much as a war as a struggle for survival, forever hounded and attacked as he tries to rescue the less powerful of his people from the same extermination Jews suffered during the Holocaust -- the same extermination he sees repeating itself with mutantkind. He's a hero, or probably better called an antihero. No man who'd sacrifice everything in his ongoing battle to save an entire race from persecution, suffering neverending betrayals, losses, and pain, could be called anything else.
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
Except he's not killing every non-Jew -- he's killing every Nazi, to maintain the analogy. Humans hate and murder mutants, just as Nazis did Jews.
Not all humans do.

quote:
He's a hero, or probably better called an antihero. No man who'd sacrifice everything in his ongoing battle to save an entire race from persecution, suffering neverending betrayals, losses, and pain, could be called anything else.
Any man who tries to kill 6 billion people because some of those people persecute his people is not a hero.
 
Posted by Lalo (Member # 3772) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Rakeesh:
In Magneto's own words, mutants are the cure, not the disease, Eddie. Which is a mirror image of the evil portions of humanity's thinking in the film as well. He thought that before humanity (well, only a small segment acting on its own) attempted to obliterate all mutants, and he thought it afterwards.

In fact he almost certainly thought it all the way back to his childhood in the Holocaust, when the horrors of Nazi brutality more or less ruined him as a good person.

Just because he is not a mustache-twirling black tophat wearing caricature does not mean he isn't a villain. Just because, as Gary Oldman says, everyone thinks they're righteous does not mean everyone possesses righteousness to a substantial degree.

Magneto was a racist, pure and simple. His race was superior, and the other race-humanity-was inferior, and individual humans were just as culpable for the crimes of the worst humans as were those human criminals or evil bastards themselves.

You can be provoked and still be evil.

And this is why I'm upset. Ratner's screwed up majestically -- as did Singer, in large part, but he's definitely come the closest to portraying Magneto as the antihero he truly is.

You're right, but only because Hollywood's wrong. But at least you can finally brag to all your friends that you were right about something! Lord knows the law of averages was on your side...
 
Posted by Lalo (Member # 3772) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dagonee:
quote:
Except he's not killing every non-Jew -- he's killing every Nazi, to maintain the analogy. Humans hate and murder mutants, just as Nazis did Jews.
Not all humans do.

quote:
He's a hero, or probably better called an antihero. No man who'd sacrifice everything in his ongoing battle to save an entire race from persecution, suffering neverending betrayals, losses, and pain, could be called anything else.
Any man who tries to kill 6 billion people because some of those people persecute his people is not a hero.

And there's his tragic flaw. Magneto believes (as have most Western philosophies) that cruelty and persecution are fundamental traits of human nature -- no, not all people are currently harassing, kidnapping, and murdering mutants; but most would if it were in their power. And if they wanted to escape responsibility for the crimes of their representatives, they would fight within their own governments to effect change that would stop the persecution of mutantkind.

It's worth noting that Osama bin Laden's offered the same justification, if with notably less reasoning for his case.

But the film version of Magneto is exaggerated, in any case. You said it yourself, Rob -- Magneto matures, and moves from wanting to fight humankind to wanting to save his people. Hence, for example, Asteroid M. Magneto's means are many, but his goals have always been the same -- to protect mutantkind, and let them live in peace and safety. Nothing less. He is a hero, and my personal favorite in the X-saga.
 
Posted by Rakeesh (Member # 2001) on :
 
Eddie,

quote:
Except he's not killing every non-Jew -- he's killing every Nazi, to maintain the analogy. Humans hate and murder mutants, just as Nazis did Jews.
Your analogy is flawed, because it does not include a group which has something in common with Nazis without actually being Nazis. To be accurate, you could say he's not killing every non-Jew, he's killing every Germanic people on the face of the Earth. Or trying to, at any rate. Not even just Germans either, who in my opinion bear some responsibility for the Holocaust.

quote:
Magneto believes humankind is irredeemable, and doomed to forever persecute the weak or helpless they have in their power.
The trouble is that if he believed this and still wanted to be an honorable person, he could try and destroy humanity's power without utterly destroying humanity. As the Mutant Master of Magnetism versus the world as led by industrialized nations, he would be uniquely suited to such an effort. But in the films at least, he never tries it.

In the first film, he could still be called honorable...or at least stopping short of genocide. His willingness to slaughter a mutant child to achieve his goals when he could do it himself is proof of Magneto's true nature.

In the second film, that goes out the window. The machine which would destroy all mutants is useless without both Xavier and the wheelchair cyborg mutant whose name I forget. Magneto could have killed either or both and destroyed the machine, and the sword over the heads of all mutants would be gone.

quote:
Magneto doesn't see his fight so much as a war as a struggle for survival, forever hounded and attacked as he tries to rescue the less powerful of his people from the same extermination Jews suffered during the Holocaust -- the same extermination he sees repeating itself with mutantkind.
Maybe it started that way (we can assume that for a child of the Holocaust there's a good chance it did), but it certainly didn't end that way. What started as a defensive war (maybe) became a war of conquest. "I say we are the cure," sums it up, again.

quote:
No man who'd sacrifice everything in his ongoing battle to save an entire race from persecution, suffering neverending betrayals, losses, and pain, could be called anything else.
Who betrays Magneto that he doesn't betray first? Who hurts Magneto without being first hurt by them? The suffering he endures, he largely brings on himself. Especially concerning his kids and his 'friend' Xavier.

He did his stint on Asteroid M for awhile, but it didn't stick, remember? Soon enough he was back to efforts to conquer and annihilate. He eventually left for Genosha, where *gasp* he was set up as a god-king sort of person.

A hero is someone who endures great personal suffering and/or danger in an effort to achieve a worthy, honorable goal. Without doing evil along the way, in my opinion. Magneto's suffering is largely self-wrough, the danger he endures is usually minimal when fighting his chosen enemy, and he does gads and gads of evil along the way.

Oh, and if you ever get mutation, ask for incredibly sharp wits. For better insults. Because that one about bragging was definitely mere homo sapiens quality, bordering on neanderthal, flatscan:p
 
Posted by Jet (Member # 9475) on :
 
I saw the movie on momorial day and for a movie that people saw to see things get blown up and killing, it was good. But as for plot it was very poorly written.

I didn't read all of the articles descussed already so if i repeat anything i apologize. i heard someone say that Juggernaut was Prof. X's then they would be right acourding to one of the comic book series. as for the others i don't know.

I didn't get the joke about "I'm the Juggernaut bitch" but i suppose it was a big deal. the joke that got the biggest response in the theater i was in was when mystique spilt here guts about magnetos hideout.

And something i thought was funny was when Prof. X. said something about Jean surviving under the river, a girl in the back said "What" in that blonde voice. it just hit me funny.

As for a fourth movie. the only way i can see that they could is if Magneto regained his powers totaly and started to lead the X-men and finish Prof. X's. mission. and the bad guy would have to be Apocalypse (pardon the spelling i'm not so good at english). However if they were going to have a fourth with Apocalypse then Angel would have gotton the cure. then (as in the comics) Apocalypse would restore him to Arcangel. but they ruined that by having him keep his powers.

One of my favorite seens in the movie is when Kitty tricket Juggernaut into running into the wall. on the issue of Juggernaut, i heard he wasn't even a mutant that he found a crystal of some sort that gave him powers. also they did him no justice in the movies. in the comics he would go toe-to-toe with the hulk and tie or win every time. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Sterling (Member # 8096) on :
 
All right, one more bit of venting.

Since when does Professor X get all huffy and defensive? "I don't have to justify myself to you"?

And isn't the appropriate response to "What have you done" "I touched her face, you twit. Which was apparently enough to let out the alternate personality that *you* created."
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by starLisa:
quote:
Originally posted by TrapperKeeper:
star, I think you're just seeing things in the movie and relating them to your personal experience. The writers did not set out to metaphorically compare the mutants to gays.

Oh, please. They consciously put in things that carried that metaphor. "Have you tried not being a mutant" is clearly a reference to all the parents who've asked the same thing of their gay children.

I'm not reading anything into it. The fact that you don't see it only indicates that it's not something you've ever had to deal with. Live and learn.

You seem to think that YOUR view is the only right one, but a lot of the time a lot of people see things different.


Then you get all pissy.


You can see it however you like, but if your world view was the only correct one the world would be a far poorer place.


And I am not talking just about a stupid X-Men move, sL. Every person who disagrees with you is met with scorn and disdain, and I for one am getting a little sick of reading it.


God forbid ANYONE even IMPLY that your own experiences MIGHT color your perceptions. [Roll Eyes]

I am not saying I didn't see some of the same issues, but I don't consider myself an actual mind reader so I don't know for sure what they meant.

Lots of other situations fit that bill as well. The X-Men comics have been filled with metaphors of violence and bigotry for years, far longer than the recent huff over gay marriage.


One way or another, you sure seem full of anger and self-righteousness, and that makes pleasant conversation hard to come by for all of us.

[ June 03, 2006, 09:07 PM: Message edited by: Kwea ]
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
Since when does Professor X get all huffy and defensive? "I don't have to justify myself to you"?
A lot, actually. For example, when he sucked Magneto's mind out. When he kept the sentient being enslaved within the danger room. He's constantly making choices like that and expecting people to just deal with them.

I get the impression that people complaining about how a character is represented simply have a fixed point in the continuity on which their impressions are based.
 
Posted by Rakeesh (Member # 2001) on :
 
Wait a minute, Juggernaut actually won against the Hulk in a one-on-one fight? If it happened, that's total damn BS.
 
Posted by Rakeesh (Member # 2001) on :
 
To be fair, though, those two developments are pretty recent in X-Men 'history' Dagonee. If you're thinking about the Ultimate X-Men's version of Xavier's 'handling' of Magneto after he was thought to be dead, and Astonishing X-Men's handling of him being exposed as an artificial-life mutant enslaver.

I definitely like the newer approach to Xavier. He is less a white knight on a white stallion (wheelchair).
 
Posted by Xavier (Member # 405) on :
 
quote:
Wait a minute, Juggernaut actually won against the Hulk in a one-on-one fight? If it happened, that's total damn BS.
He did beat Hulk in a 1 v 1 fight once when it was him versus the merged Hulk during Peter David's run. The merged Hulk's powers were somewhat different than the stupid Hulk most people are familiar with. He starts out even stronger than the regular Hulk, but is less quick to anger. He also was a straight up "good guy", and so was much more likely to hold back.

And it wasn't exactly a straight up fight, as the Juggernaut wore normal street clothes so that Hulk wouldn't recognize him, which made Banner hold back a ton. He wasn't sure how hard he could hit without killing the guy, and so was fighting defensively. Banner never got mad, because he was so confused as to how his opponent didn't seem phased by his punches. Without Hulk getting even a little bit mad, Juggernaut was able to beat him pretty easily.

It was a cheap trick, but it still counts. Funny thing Juggs outsmarting an opponent [Smile] .

Later in David's run, after Hulk was enhanced by Apocalypse into "War", Hulk completely mopped the floor with Juggs, and was about to kill him when Absorbing man saved his life by distracting Hulk. I'm not sure if that quite counts, since Hulk was enhanced.

Hulk and Juggs has always been a close match. Hulk is far stronger (its not even close), but Juggernaut is far more resilient (its not even close). Hulk usually gets the best hits in, but because Juggs is truly invulnerable, it doesn't do any serious damage, no matter how hard he is hit. It pretty much always comes down to a draw, since niether can do much more than temporarily daze the other.

As the fight between them goes on, and Hulk gets madder and madder, it becomes far more lop-sided. But even if Hulk beats Juggs into the pavement, Juggs just gets back up, so its a draw. The one time Juggs won (that I know of) it was because he tricked Hulk into not getting mad before he was incapacitated.
 
Posted by Rakeesh (Member # 2001) on :
 
I should have specified 'straight-up fight', because lots of people have beaten the Hulk, even puny humans, with trickery or science or somethiing. Thanks for the info:) My nerdly powers are growing.

Is Juggernaut more resilient, though? I haven't read as much Hulk as you have (I can tell just by your descriptions of the fights), but it seems to me that although the Hulk does get wounded while in Hulk form, it simply serves to make him even angrier and thus tougher and moore powerful, and harder to further injure. Unless he fought someone whose power increased at a rate greater than Hulk's anger let HIS power increase, can he truly be considered vulnerable?

Again, exceptions for thinks like adamantium needles, tricky science, magic, etc. You know, since Juggernaut is magic based I'm surprised Dr. Strange hasn't simply taken care of him a long time ago. Juggernaut regularly tangles with people who're buddy-buddy with the good Dr, after all.
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
To be fair, though, those two developments are pretty recent in X-Men 'history' Dagonee. If you're thinking about the Ultimate X-Men's version of Xavier's 'handling' of Magneto after he was thought to be dead, and Astonishing X-Men's handling of him being exposed as an artificial-life mutant enslaver.
I definitely like the newer approach to Xavier. He is less a white knight on a white stallion (wheelchair).

The sucking out Magneto's mind was early 90s - over a decade ago.

On the Magneto as a hero front, remember that prior to Dark Phoenix - in other words, 20+ years ago - Magneto captured the X-Men and was going to keep them imprisoned permanently regressed to children as revenge. He wasn't fighting them to achieve his goal of protecting mutants, merely seeking revenge on Xavier.

I think people who see Magneto merely as a misguided champion of mutant rights miss the true complexity of him as a villain. He's got some good motivations. He's also a vengeful, selfish, controlling, racist, and a megalomaniac who lets his hate get in the way of achieving whatever noble goals he happens to possess.
 
Posted by Xavier (Member # 405) on :
 
quote:
Is Juggernaut more resilient, though? I haven't read as much Hulk as you have (I can tell just by your descriptions of the fights), but it seems to me that although the Hulk does get wounded while in Hulk form, it simply serves to make him even angrier and thus tougher and moore powerful, and harder to further injure. Unless he fought someone whose power increased at a rate greater than Hulk's anger let HIS power increase, can he truly be considered vulnerable?
I would say that yes, Juggs is the more invulnerable (as much as someone could be more invulnerable [Smile] ).

Hulk is nearly invulnerable, but not quite. Hulk can be cut. His bones can be broken. He needs to breathe oxygen (he can drown or asphyxiate). Lazers can penetrate his skin.

None of these are true of Juggs. He can be knocked out, but that's about it. Though I think his power has decreased recently. In the New Excaliber, it was mentioned that he can drown now. Not sure how that came to be.

But like I said, Hulk is far stronger. They start out about the same, but Hulk's strength is completely limitless. There's no feat of strength he can't accomplish if he gets mad enough. Even something as impossible as, say, ripping Juggernaut's arms off. Hulk's irresistable force has overcome many immovable objects in the 30+ years he's been around.

If I was to bet on one of the two for a straight up fight to the death, it would be on Hulk all the way.
 
Posted by Boothby171 (Member # 807) on :
 
Maybe this was asked and answered before...but just after Magneto ripped the GG Bridge off its moorings and landed it on Alcatraz (I love how he levitates himself above the roadway so he doesn't get hurt when it crashes, but everyone else--mutant warriors included--seems to survive it anyhow, even the cars not really budging from their pre-crash positions)...but I digress.

Where did the sun go? How did we do from a beautiful sunrise (or was it a sunset), to a sunny afternoon, to...late at night (that last transition taking all of 21 seconds or so)?

And why didn't Wolverine just take a "Cure" needle and jab Jean/Phoenix with it. Boy is HE going to feel stupid in a few days for missing that opportunity!
 
Posted by Boothby171 (Member # 807) on :
 
quote:
The dude with boobs-I mean, androgynous chick was Arclight!
My son and I both thought it was "Prince". I asked him (he had seen it before), "What are her powers? What does she do, bring down a strong, Purple Rain?"

And we loved the "Juggernaut, Bitch" line. Who'd a thought, a multimillion dollar movie borrowing lines from a cheap ebaumsworld video dub!
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
quote:
He needs to breathe oxygen (he can drown or asphyxiate).
This was actually one of my gripes when his "friends" recently blasted him off the planet.
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
Where did the sun go? How did we do from a beautiful sunrise (or was it a sunset), to a sunny afternoon, to...late at night (that last transition taking all of 21 seconds or so)?
One of the mutants has the power to invoke appropriate dramatic lighting for any event.
 
Posted by Xavier (Member # 405) on :
 
quote:
This was actually one of my gripes when his "friends" recently blasted him off the planet.
I haven't been reading Hulk for a while now, what were the circumstances of that? (and is that how he got to the "Planet Hulk"?)

Not knowing the circumstances, I will point out that it has been established that Hulk has tremendous lung capacity. Whether that affects the plausibility of what you are talking about, I can't say.
 
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
 
I'd like to see a whole separate thread for conversations just like this Hulk v. Juggernaut one.

I love reading this stuff.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dagonee:
quote:
Where did the sun go? How did we do from a beautiful sunrise (or was it a sunset), to a sunny afternoon, to...late at night (that last transition taking all of 21 seconds or so)?
One of the mutants has the power to invoke appropriate dramatic lighting for any event.
That would be Moodlight. Her twin sister Incidentia provides the appropriate music for whatever circumstance the mutants find themselves in.
 
Posted by TrapperKeeper (Member # 7680) on :
 
Theyre great at parties
 
Posted by starLisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dagonee:
quote:
Where did the sun go? How did we do from a beautiful sunrise (or was it a sunset), to a sunny afternoon, to...late at night (that last transition taking all of 21 seconds or so)?
One of the mutants has the power to invoke appropriate dramatic lighting for any event.
I'm guessing that the missing scene will turn up on the DVD.
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
lol
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
On the note to the Xmen movies tipping the hat to the gay rights issue, remember Ian McKellen has for a long time been an advocate of Gay rights. Maybe its just me but the scene at the Grays house where Jeans parents mention something being wrong with her Ian says VERY emphatically "You think something is WRONG with her?" I do not think Ian misses the correlation between the Xmen universe and the one we live in. But hey thats my speculation.

I am sad I missed the scene at the end of the credits, but I did notice the standard Stan Lee cameo at the beginning of the movie. He is holding a hose I believe when jean lifts all those cars and makes the water flow up and he has the standard look of shock on his face.

I agree with Dag's review of the Magneto character, I really do not think the writers want us to think of Magneto as a complex hero, but certainly not a pure evil villain.

Was it just me or did anybody else think when Jean/Phoenix carves her nails into wolverine and he growls as he heals that that was kinda hot?

I had a question though about characters. Who is the guy that can make multiple copies of himself? And exactly how many can he make? Was it really possible for him to make almost 100 of himself and have them all doing seperate things at once? I mean they say he was caught robbing 7 banks at once, and then we have him impersonating a camp full of people. Whats stopping him from using his 100 copies or possibly more to attack the military team sent to the brotherhoods camp?
 
Posted by Scott R (Member # 567) on :
 
Madrox, the multiple man.

He's dead, I think...I never followed his character much, but I think he was one of the characters to die from the Legacy virus.

quote:
Whats stopping him from using his 100 copies or possibly more to attack the military team sent to the brotherhoods camp?
Each of his copies (as I understand it) comes from a particular part of Jamie Madrox's psyce. One comes from his anger, one from love, etc. They all have normal, athletic-human strength.
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
Madrox the Multiple Man - he was a guest on X-Men and then appeared regularly in the first revamp of X-Factor. I'm not sure of his limit, but it gets pretty high, and depends on what each of them are doing.
 
Posted by erosomniac (Member # 6834) on :
 
quote:
I had a question though about characters. Who is the guy that can make multiple copies of himself? And exactly how many can he make? Was it really possible for him to make almost 100 of himself and have them all doing seperate things at once?
Multiple Man. He was an X-Factor dude, if I recall correctly.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
Ooh, this post pointed out another problem I can't believe I missed: apparently New York is now close enough to San Francisco that the X-Men can get there almost immediately, and Angel can fly there almost as fast.

Fixed the link.

[ June 09, 2006, 04:24 PM: Message edited by: Chris Bridges ]
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
Bad link, Chris.

I don't remember Angel getting there "immediately." There were at least two night scenes after his jump out the window, weren't there?

From comic continuity, he can fly from Egypt to NY in something like 12 hours. Plus, he might have just taken a plane.

Per the X-Men, if this plane is based on the SR-71, then it would take less than two hours to get to San Francisco.
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
From the perspective of Hollywood, the only thing between New York and San Francisco is a single heartwarming farming community. So that's probably about right.
 
Posted by Sterling (Member # 8096) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dagonee:
quote:
Since when does Professor X get all huffy and defensive? "I don't have to justify myself to you"?
A lot, actually. For example, when he sucked Magneto's mind out. When he kept the sentient being enslaved within the danger room. He's constantly making choices like that and expecting people to just deal with them.

I get the impression that people complaining about how a character is represented simply have a fixed point in the continuity on which their impressions are based.

Where in the movies did either of these events occur?

And where in the movies has he ever felt a need to defend his actions before?
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
Where in the movies did either of these events occur?

And where in the movies has he ever felt a need to defend his actions before?

No where. Of course, there's nowhere in the movies where Cyclops or Professor X died before, either. Or where Rogue tried to have her powers removed. Or where Mystique betrayed Eric, or Eric Mystique.

I was referring to the comics, with 40+ years of issues and probably 10 or more years of actual story time, not the movies which, taken together, show us about two weeks' worth of time.
 
Posted by MrSquicky (Member # 1802) on :
 
Just saw it. I want to play the X-Men movie fan fiction game too.

The wonderful thing about super-hero movies is they're the new mythology. I mean, in a Campbellian (Joseph not Bruce) sense. They've got underlying themes built right into them.

You've got two characters, one throws fire, the other throws ice. There's like three things you get for free right off the bat.

You take a scene with Pyro going all out with his powers and Magneto egging him on. He really pushes it and his fire kicks up to a noticably higher level and he promptly passes out. Magneto levitates him up and over to him. Pyro comes to - he's got blood dripping out his nose - and says something like "That's the real power. They'd never let me do that at that school." Maybe Magneto makes a comment about Pyro graduating or something.

A later scene, say at the truck prison break, Pyro and Iceman face off, shooting their respective beams at each other like they did at the end. Pyro's fire is more powerful and overcomes the ice. Iceman is in real danger, but someone (maybe Shadowcat) comes to his rescue.

Possibly Rogue gets burnt, but Wolverine's right there and they do the healing swap trick. Logan says something like, "I'll always be there to fix you up."

Back at the school, Bobby is ranting to Rogue (and Kitty's around too). He and Pyro used to go at it at school and Bobby always came out on top. He's being held back by their constraints and their training on focusing and controlling his powers, while Pyro's just getting stronger. He was too weak. He could have gotten her killed. Rogue watches him, wanting desperately to hold him and comfort him, but just can't. She starts to defend the teachers, maybe talking about the combined tactics they showed in the battleroom sequence, and Bobby stalks away, putting up a wall of ice to keep her from following. Kitty goes through the wall after him. The ice is translucent, so you can just make out her catching up to him and touching him somehow.

It's getting long, but if you can throw a scene in with Prof X or one of the other teachers talking and demonstrating to Bobby about smart use of power winning out over brute strength and also about the dangers of losing control or burning yourself out when you push too hard, it'd help.

Then you do the scene at the end, with the Pyro/Iceman face off, pretty much the same way. Pyro's extremely confident, as he's beaten him before. He engulfs him in flame, gives the "You should have stayed in school." Iceman emerges from the flame, encased in the ice armor and lays him right out. "You shouldn't have left."

---

I love Chris's Cyclops/Wolverine fight scene. I especially love the idea of Wolverine, lying there with his wounds from the energy beam beating he took rapidly healing, with Scott, maybe limping a little from a shot Logan got in, saying "Some of us don't heal as quickly as you."

Instead of leaving for Akalai Lake though, I'd have Scott go to his room and bring up a video of Jean teaching. She's teaching mythology, perhaps even Campbell's The Hero's Journey. Anyway, they're talking about the dying/rebirth motif (stage 11 in THJ), and Jean mentions who her favorite myth was always that of the Phoenix, who's age and weaknesses were purged away by the fire, leading to the emergence of a young, strong creature. Perhaps there is also some mention how many cultures looked on death/rebirth type experiences as a way that doubts were given up and the person emerged on the other side firm and pure in purpose.

Cut to Akalai Lake. Lake in the background and in the foreground, a memorial stone to Jean Grey. As we watch, a patch on the surface of the lake starts bubbling. The heat increases and it starts steaming. A great gout of flame shoots out from the lake and Jean rises up out of it. The maelstrom that accompanies her rises causes a fair bit of destruction, including picking up the memorial stone and smashing it to pieces against something.

I haven't really worked out the rest of the Cyclops/Jean/Wolverine thing right now. I would have liked to have seen a struggle between the animalistic and ordered, going in both directions. So Logan brings out the beast in Jean and her awakened feral nature charges up his animal side too. This main conflict plays off of the themes established in the Pyro/Iceman conflict. Also, Phoenix's influence on Wolverine pulls him away from the Rogue and the rest of the family he found.

---

Storm's "There's nothing wrong with any of us." scene should go soon after Rogue being cut off by the ice wall. Rogue should listen to this, somehow keeping control, and then ask, while peeling off her glove "There's nothing wrong with me, right? So take my hand. Go ahead. Take it!"
"It's so easy for you to say that. You've got cool powers. Me, the only power I have is to suck the life out of anyone I touch. My whole life, there's always going to be this wall between me and everyone else. And it's so lonely. So lonely and so cold."
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MrSquicky:

You've got two characters, one throws fire, the other throws ice. There's like three things you get for free right off the bat.

Ummm.... was I the only one in the theatre looking for the blinking light at the bottom of the frame that reads: "Pay attention to the symbolic relationship between good and evil?"

This scene was so obvious that I saw it coming in the first scene of the second movie. Talk about predictable and boring.

By the way, its not free. It cost me 6.50 for a matinee ticket. 4 for the soda.
 
Posted by Orincoro (Member # 8854) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dagonee:

On the Magneto as a hero front, remember that prior to Dark Phoenix - in other words, 20+ years ago - Magneto captured the X-Men and was going to keep them imprisoned permanently regressed to children as revenge. He wasn't fighting them to achieve his goal of protecting mutants, merely seeking revenge on Xavier.

We have entered the twilight of all reason... and that was from the "classic" X-men... [ROFL]
 


Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2