The new iPod video has a capacity of 80GB, capable of either 20 hours of music or six-and-a-half hours of video. 80GB means up to 20,000 songs, 25,000 photos, 100 hours of video, or any combination of the above.
The new iPod Shuffle looks about half the size of the original design (as if that wasn't small enough). It's literally smaller than a matchbook. And it has a nifty clip, too, so you don't have to have it hanging from its lanyard or whatnot.
Comments?
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
Now I'm really tempted to upgrade from my battery-dead 2G 30 gig model.
80 gigs would last me a while.
Posted by twinky (Member # 693) on :
quote:Later this year Intel will be introducing pin compatible upgrades to its Core 2 and Xeon lines, except instead of two cores these processors will feature four. Codenamed Kenstfield (Core 2) and Clovertown (Xeon), Intel's new quad-core processors will dramatically increase the amount of processing power you can have in a single system. Given that the Mac Pro features two LGA-771 sockets, you could theoretically drop two Clovertown processors in there and you'd have an 8-core Mac Pro.
Without a doubt Apple will release a quad-core version of the Mac Pro, either by the end of this year or early next year, but are users who buy the Mac Pro today missing out? While we're still a couple of months away from being able to test a retail Clovertown CPU in the Mac Pro, we wanted to see if the current engineering samples of the chip would work.
We grabbed a pair of 2.4GHz Clovertown samples and tossed them in the system, and to our pleasure, they worked just fine. Our samples used a 1066MHz FSB, although we're expecting the final chip to use a 1333MHz FSB, but the most important part of the test is that all 8 cores were detected and functional.
I don't need eight cores. I don't even need four -- two is quite suitable for my purposes (I have a dual-processor G5 tower). Still, for some reason that article got me a little hot and bothered.
Also, the new iPod nanos seem like they could prove as scratch-resistant as the old minis. If only larger iPods were so durable...
Posted by breyerchic04 (Member # 6423) on :
Ooh nano's come in pink!
Posted by airmanfour (Member # 6111) on :
*sigh*
Posted by dantesparadigm (Member # 8756) on :
With the new version of iTunes these can now play full length movies, super exciting.
Apparently my 60 gig iPod, Ippy, just dropped 50$ in price and increased 20 gigs in memory, C'est la vie, serpents sur un avion. I'm thinking of getting a tricked-out new 24 inch iMac to take some of the slack of my PowerBook, Macky. He has to go down to Texas to get his poor little logic board fixed.
Posted by Elmer's Glue (Member # 9313) on :
This one is better. link Posted by Mike (Member # 55) on :
Better in what sense? It only goes up to 1GB, and doesn't play videos. I suppose it depends on what you use it for, though.
Posted by Elmer's Glue (Member # 9313) on :
They also have a 2G version, i should have sent that link. And I was saying it was better than the non video ipods.
Posted by Tarrsk (Member # 332) on :
quote:Originally posted by Mike: Better in what sense? It only goes up to 1GB, and doesn't play videos. I suppose it depends on what you use it for, though.
A cube also seems like the worst possible shape for a portable music player. Put it in your pocket, and it makes a bulge in your pants (*ahem*). Clip it to your belt, and you... have a bulge on your pants.
No, a slim design is definitely the way to go.
Posted by Fitz (Member # 4803) on :
Well, I thought the same thing about the mobiblu originally, but then I saw it. You would have to have some really tight pants for it to show any kind of bulge. That being said, I had no desire to buy one. It seemed really flimsy. Sometimes I feel like I'm the only one who's not into the "smaller is better" way of mind. I like a bit of weight, so I like my 20GB Zen Jukebox.
But even I had to join the slim crowd, so I got a Zen V. It's great.