This is topic A piece of legal trivia in forum Books, Films, Food and Culture at Hatrack River Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.hatrack.com/ubb/main/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=045269

Posted by twinky (Member # 693) on :
 
From the March 2006 Harper's Index:

Number of the 193 "laughing episodes" during Supreme Court arguments last term that were caused by Antonin Scalia: 77
Number caused by Clarence Thomas: 0

So I guess the other 126 "laughing episodes" were caused by the other seven between them. Does Scalia's apparent humourist bent show in his decisions, concurrences, and dissents?
 
Posted by Celaeno (Member # 8562) on :
 
Yes. Scalia's opinions, although I rarely agree with them, are by far the most entertaining Supreme Court opinions to read.
 
Posted by Silent E (Member # 8840) on :
 
He does have a sense of humor, it's true, but somehow that's never the part of his written opinions that stands out to me. To me, he actually comes across as rude, cranky, and occasionally unprofessional, besides politically very conservative.
 
Posted by James Tiberius Kirk (Member # 2832) on :
 
quote:
He does have a sense of humor, it's true, but somehow that's never the part of his written opinions that stands out to me. To me, he actually comes across as rude, cranky, and occasionally unprofessional
Paging Dr. House....

--j_k
 


Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2