This is topic The Jane Austen Experiment... in forum Books, Films, Food and Culture at Hatrack River Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.hatrack.com/ubb/main/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=049463

Posted by Puffy Treat (Member # 7210) on :
 
Would Jane be published today?
 
Posted by Javert Hugo (Member # 3980) on :
 
I don't believe him - that no one recognized it. I'll bet that just about everyone recognized it and they gave him the form letter brushoff.

I can't think of any reason it would be in the company's best interest to call him on it. They have nothing invested in him and it's the easiest to simply walk away without an explanation.
 
Posted by Puffy Treat (Member # 7210) on :
 
Did you read the full article? They mentioned that a few people did recognize it.
 
Posted by Javert Hugo (Member # 3980) on :
 
They mentioned that he assumed and it seemed a few people didn't recognize it. That's not the same thing at all.
 
Posted by Puffy Treat (Member # 7210) on :
 
They talk with those who recognized it. Scroll down a bit. [Smile]
 
Posted by Javert Hugo (Member # 3980) on :
 
Right - they didn't talk with anyone who DIDN'T recognize it.

That they talked to one who did does not mean that he was the only one.
 
Posted by Uprooted (Member # 8353) on :
 
I'm with Javert on this one--just because those who did not acknowledge his game sent a form letter doesn't mean they didn't recognize it. Which is exactly what a couple of the publishers said.

Although I much prefer the response of the one who said "check your copy of P&P, which no doubt resides in close proximity to your typewriter." (paraphrase from memory, not direct quote)
 
Posted by Icarus (Member # 3162) on :
 
I'm with Javert.

-o-

(And I personally think Austen is currently ridiculously overrated.)
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
My wife will REALLY hate you if she hears you say that, Icky.

[Wink] [Razz]
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
I saw the title of this thread and thought someone besides me had read the new Thursday Next book.

By the way, if no one besides me has done so, you really should.
 
Posted by Tara (Member # 10030) on :
 
If I recieved a blatantly plaigarized copy of a famous book to be published, I would almost surely send back the standard rejection letter.

Giving special treatment (such a writing a special letter) to goofy people only fuels them.

MY first impression was that his guy was trying to discredit British publishing houses because they hadn't published his own book, but maybe that's just me being cynical. Still, the guy has no evidence that the publishers DIDN'T recognize Pride & Prejudice.
 
Posted by Leonide (Member # 4157) on :
 
I had no idea it was out already, Tom!

*runs to Amazon*

I loves me some Thursday Next.

re: Jane Austen...i too think she's overrated. I have yet to read any of her books all the way through, except Persuasion, which I still didn't enjoy that much. However, I almost across-the-board enjoy the filmic adaptations of her works...so maybe i'm just missing something when I read them. *shrug*

Also, has anyone ever seen Emma Thompson's Golden Globe acceptance speech for her Sense and Sensibility screenplay? She wrote a send-up to Austen, penning the speech to resemble what Jane might have wrote were she alive today (or if we had the Golden Globes in the 19th century)

A cursory search and I can't find a link on YouTube...anyway, it's an extra on the Sense and Sensibility dvd, if anyone can get their hands on that...pretty amusing [Smile]
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
The thing is, I don't think proving Austen wouldn't get published today (and I agree, he did NOT prove that) would be an insult to Austen. Lots of great writers wouldn't get published today, and it doesn't diminish how great they are. Shakespeare wouldn't sell his plays today, not in iambic pentameter with English vernacular that his audience understood perfectly but we must use historical volumes to help figure out.

The plots would sell today, but they'd have to be written to appeal to today's audience. That's no slam on the Bard, or on Austen, just a fact. And again, does not diminish how wonderful they are, just reflects and understanding that times change and publishers look for different things.

[heresy]I daresay that in 100 years, no one would publish Harry Potter in the form we know today. Things will undoutedly be very different yet again.[/heresy]
 


Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2