This is topic Summer Olympics 2008: Beijing in forum Books, Films, Food and Culture at Hatrack River Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.hatrack.com/ubb/main/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=053162

Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
As many of you know, the Olympics start on August 8th, 2008 in Beijing. This thread will be for Olympics enthusiasts, rather than about the political side of China and the Olympics (of which even as of today there is developing news of a hubub going on).

I'll try over the next month and a half to try and do an overview of some of the favorites and expectations for the sports and any news items I come across so when the Olympics actually start, you'll know what to expect and such, if you aren't a regular Olympic news reader. Fair warning, I'm probably going to focus on American atheletes, but non-American Hatrackers should feel more than welcome to post about the shining star atheletes from their own countries.

On a personal note, we found out today that my future sister in law's brother will be on the US Oympic rowing team, and her whole family will be going to China to cheer him on in August!

Only a month and a half left until the games begin!
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
I am lobbying for a Magic: The Gathering to be considered an Olympic sport. Whose with me!!??

Anyone know if they have any olympic martial art sports? I'm trying to figure out which sport to be excited for.
 
Posted by ricree101 (Member # 7749) on :
 
Taekwondo is an olympic sport, as are boxing and judo.

Edit:
Wrestling is also an olympic sport, but I cannot remember whether it is winter or summer.

Personally, I'd really like to see some sort of mma enter the olympics. It apparently almost happened in Athens, but fell through.
 
Posted by Xann. (Member # 11482) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Blayne Bradley:
I am lobbying for a Magic: The Gathering to be considered an Olympic sport. Whose with me!!??


Sounds great, but the problem would be

Announcer: "kobiyashi of japan is now tapping 8 ice covered mountain...he plays an ice goblin AND,.. OH MY GOD SEARING FLESH IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S ALL OVER AND THAT ONE GUY IN THE STAND GOES WILD !!!!!!!!!"
 
Posted by Shanna (Member # 7900) on :
 
Gymnastics is usually my focus during the Summer Olympics. Occasionally, I'll catch a track/field event but they don't interest me as much as the racing events during the winter season.

I'm also really excited to see Taekwondo this year. I keep seeing that phone commercial on tv with all the TKD siblings doing flips around their house. I'll also probably catch Judo and maybe boxing since my instructor keeps insisting that I should watch a fight sometime. Unfortunately, there's no Karate (for an unknown reason) though I know its on the list of sports being considered should any be removed from future Olympics. Shaolin hasn't become as popularized which is unfortunate because I'd kill see a Wushu or kickboxing competition outside of tiny, fuzzing videos on youtube.
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ricree101:
Edit:
Wrestling is also an olympic sport, but I cannot remember whether it is winter or summer.

Summer. [Smile]

I'll watch almost any Olympic sport, but I tend to focus on men's swimming. Very carefully. [Wink]
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
Since I have a competitive gymnast in my house, that is where we focus. My oldest daughter also loves to watch diving. I enjoy some track and field and swimming.

But I truly love all things Olympic. I'll watch as much of it as I can. [Smile]
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
I like swimming.

Though probably not for the reason Carrie does.

A friend of mine at works plays cards with Michael Phelps; they went to high school together. I'll have him put in a good word for you Carrie.
 
Posted by sarcasticmuppet (Member # 5035) on :
 
I became a huge fan of men's swimming last summer olympics, and I might try to catch Olympic fencing as well.
 
Posted by Trent Destian (Member # 11653) on :
 
I was never really interested in the team sports aspect of the olympics. For instance the basketball or baseball. Never seemed very, I don't know, Olympic to me. Track, biking, gymnastics, swimming. These are olympic trials to me. Ping pong, horse riding, and volleyball, well I'm probably not going to tune in. These people who practice these sports are altheletes to be sure. Olympians? I couldn't say.
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
Anyone know if they have any olympic martial art sports?
Fencing is a summer Olympic sport, too.
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
Men's swimming had a good cast of characters in '04. From cowboys like Gary Hall Jr. to pretty boys like Peirsol and guys who quitely get it done like Krayzelburg not to mention the horror of Crocker choking in the 4 x 100 freestyle. It was all there. Swimming, track, gymnastics are what I like to watch. I like the blend between individual events and relays.

[ June 27, 2008, 06:18 PM: Message edited by: Irami Osei-Frimpong ]
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lyrhawn:
Though probably not for the reason Carrie does.

This is probably true. [Smile]

(And I've already got my Phelps-hookup [should it ever prove desirable...], but thanks for the offer. [Smile] )

I do watch a fair bit of gymnastics, but I purposely ignore that trampoline event. It makes little sense to me.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Seriously. Trampolining is an Olympic sport? What's next, Olmypic Double Dutch?
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
Trampolining is very similar to olympic diving, but certainly not identical, they should have separate categories.

What if Chinese human rights abuses interfere with specific events in the Olympics, can we debate it then?

I remember reading a Newsweek article about a Chinese olympic diver who won the silver or gold last olympics and dislodged his cateract jumping. He is now blind in one eye but is still training the other divers as well as competing. I really hope he doesn't lose the other eye trying for the gold again.
 
Posted by Raia (Member # 4700) on :
 
I got a private, VIP tour of the olympic village in January. [Smile]
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
There's a big article in TIME magazine about Chinese training methods. They comb the countryside looking for kids, take them from their homes, force them to train for 8 hours a day with substandard education, and the ones who don't make it can't get into college because their education sucked, and many have problems with drugs and alcohol, and their suicide rates a fairly high too. The Chinese think that if they can win more Golds than the US, then they'd be #1, so they're focusing on events where a lot of medals are up for grabs.

I guess those kind of Olympic specific things are okay to discuss, though I'd like it sidelined in a month when the games actually start.
 
Posted by Elizabeth (Member # 5218) on :
 
I read that Beijing is so plluted they are spending the next weeks seeding the clouds so that it rains. I will see if I can find a link.
 
Posted by Elizabeth (Member # 5218) on :
 
Here is one:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_20060607/ai_n16457061

I guess they also want to make sure it doesn't rain. We live in a weird world!
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lyrhawn:
There's a big article in TIME magazine about Chinese training methods. They comb the countryside looking for kids, take them from their homes, force them to train for 8 hours a day with substandard education, and the ones who don't make it can't get into college because their education sucked, and many have problems with drugs and alcohol, and their suicide rates a fairly high too. The Chinese think that if they can win more Golds than the US, then they'd be #1, so they're focusing on events where a lot of medals are up for grabs.

I guess those kind of Olympic specific things are okay to discuss, though I'd like it sidelined in a month when the games actually start.

*nods head* I read that article as well, it was fascinating though definitely heart wrenching. But I suppose we will see if all this organized hard work pays off when they distribute medals.
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Elizabeth:
Here is one:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_20060607/ai_n16457061

I guess they also want to make sure it doesn't rain. We live in a weird world!

Canadian invention [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Zamphyr (Member # 6213) on :
 
Olympic trials schedule on NBC http://usolympicteam.com/content/index/828


More than half done, mostly swimming and track & field, with 1 gymnastics left to air.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Thanks for the reminder Zamphyr.

Phelps dropped an event, which was really a backup firewall event anyway. And there was some excitement in the Track and Field trials yesterday.
 
Posted by Shanna (Member # 7900) on :
 
Watched some of the swimming trials tonight.

Sometimes I wonder if Phelps is an android or maybe a genetic experiment. He's insane.

But apparently some girl in Australia qualified for 16 (?) swimming events. Woah! They expect her to cut back to eight but still!
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
That IM that Phelps and Lochte swam was pretty sweet. I wonder if he would've done that well if his buddy wasn't nipping at his heels.
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
Yet another plug for my cousin
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Some fairly amusing Nike commercials for the Olympics
 
Posted by krynn (Member # 524) on :
 
im looking forward to the soccer, tennis, table tennis, and basketball. when the olympics were here in atlanta my family went to at least 20 different events and had tickets to every soccer game both men and women. it was really really awesome and we all have great memories.
 
Posted by pooka (Member # 5003) on :
 
It's not like no Americans have never injured themselves chasing medals, or I guess there was that gymnast (Kerry Strug?) who went ahead and vaulted on a ankle that was already sprained. I'm also seeming to recall that it turned out they would have won without that effort. Some called it sick and wrong, others said that's what the games are all about.

I feel kind of disillusioned about performance enhancing substances, myself. But I'll watch anyway.
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
I'm trying to figure out why I'm such an Olympic nut even though I don't follow or appreciate the US baseball, basketball, football or hockey leagues. I don't care whether bulls, bears, or sox win. I'm sure the money in professional sports has something to do with it, but mostly, I think I'm under the opinion that the young men and women we send to compete represent the best of us. It's not necessarily humility. I like the swagger of the '92 US Basketball team and as much as I'm looking forward to swimming, I'm going to miss the shot of Gary Hall Jr. in a red, white, and blue silk boxing robe wringing his hands above his head like Apollo Creed in Rocky IV. HERE

I think I understand the Olympic as moral in a way that traditional professional sports aren't. Maybe it has to do with free-agency in professional sports and players not being tied to the culture of the places they represent. Or maybe it's the homogeneity of the US, that one team winning is much the same as another.

[ July 14, 2008, 07:59 PM: Message edited by: Irami Osei-Frimpong ]
 
Posted by pooka (Member # 5003) on :
 
I guess that no matter who wins, the producers tell their "olympic story" which is about how they are a normal person with problems so you always feel like you are on the winning team -- the team of humanity. I think one of my favorites was the first final in 2002, that Italian cross country skier who came back and won after breaking her pole and getting a new one she jumped back in and passed the Russian going uphill. That was awesome. Once again, the motto pretty much nails it: Citius, Altius, Fortius. Though I may have got those in the wrong order. Jer. Fixed it.
 
Posted by ketchupqueen (Member # 6877) on :
 
*nods* I like the stories of people who finish despite having no chance of winning, or do their personal best even though they know they aren't going to win, or persevere despite injury or mishap. That's the part of the Olympics I like. I'm a big fan of the movie Cool Runnings, too. [Blushing]
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Paul Hamm, believed to be the States' only real hope of a gold, or maybe even a medal in men's gymnastics, is pulling out of the Olymipics citing his broken hand as the reason. He was hoping it would have recovered by now but it hasn't. Despite having the problem with his hand, he still managed to score two points higher than anyone else at the qualifying rounds. I'm wondering where his brother is in the mix. His twin brother Morgan competed in 2004 with the men's team.

Chinese officials are preparing to take 90% of Beijing's cars off the roads and are also preparing to close more or even all factories in the city. Air pollution has failed tests in recent days for a passing grade in air quality, and visibility is down to a couple hundred yards. Construction in the city has also been halted. Half the three million cars that regularly travel the city's streets have already been removed to no effect.

Some countries, including the United States, are offering breathing masks to atheletes to minimize the impact of the air.
 
Posted by BannaOj (Member # 3206) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong:
I'm trying to figure out why I'm such an Olympic nut even though I don't follow or appreciate the US baseball, basketball, football or hockey leagues. I don't care whether bulls, bears, or sox win. I'm sure the money in professional sports has something to do with it, but mostly, I think I'm under the opinion that the young men and women we send to compete represent the best of us. It's not necessarily humility. I like the swagger of the '92 US Basketball team and as much as I'm looking forward to swimming, I'm going to miss the shot of Gary Hall Jr. in a red, white, and blue silk boxing robe wringing his hands above his head like Apollo Creed in Rocky IV. HERE

I think I understand the Olympic as moral in a way that traditional professional sports aren't. Maybe it has to do with free-agency in professional sports and players not being tied to the culture of the places they represent. Or maybe it's the homogeneity of the US, that one team winning is much the same as another.

Man, you are as naive about this, as you used to be about Chicago politics. The IOC is one of the most corrupt governing bodies of sport in the world. Of course that doesn't have anything directly to do with the athletes. Except for the doping scandals.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lyrhawn:
...
Chinese officials are preparing to take 90% of Beijing's cars off the roads and are also preparing to close more or even all factories in the city. Air pollution has failed tests in recent days for a passing grade in air quality, and visibility is down to a couple hundred yards. Construction in the city has also been halted. Half the three million cars that regularly travel the city's streets have already been removed to no effect.

From an sports perspective, I think Beijing was an awful choice for the games. To put it bluntly, Beijing's population is roughly 17.5 million people living in the developing world. Now, the progress that they've made is heartening (opening three subway lines before the games, probably doubling the length of subway system and dwarfing that of Toronto, how cool is that?) but still between the factories, legendary traffic jams, and the fact that many people still heat their homes burning cakes of coal directly, improving the air quality to world standards in the few years since the bid is a bit of a lost cause. Add in the summer sandstorms, being away from the ocean, the security hastles of hosting such an event in such a big city...ugh.

From this perspective, if I was in charge of things, I think a city such as Dalian would have been much more suitable. Much cleaner, smaller, and easier to secure. Less appealing to the central government and the IOC probably though.

So while *politically* I think picking a city in China proper was an awesome choice (in retrospect), from a sports perspective ... not so much.
 
Posted by ketchupqueen (Member # 6877) on :
 
Yeah. I know I wouldn't visit a city with poor air quality even to WATCH sports, much less participate in them. (I have never been to Mexico City though I've been invited, for this reason; my asthma is too severe to risk it.)
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
Shanghai is more of the international city, but I would also agree with Dalian why? Because the Shi Lang is berthed there. Nothing would impress me more then some of the Olympic celebrations taking place on China's first aircraft carrier.
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
quote:
Man, you are as naive about this, as you used to be about Chicago politics. The IOC is one of the most corrupt governing bodies of sport in the world. Of course that doesn't have anything directly to do with the athletes. Except for the doping scandals.
When I see athletes cry on the medal podium, upon hearing the nation anthem and seeing the flag raised, I tend to think those are legitimate tears of awe, humility, and gratitude. Maybe they are just counting their endorsement deals when they get back home, or thinking how cool they are, but I like to think that they are identifying in a meaningful way, even if it's temporarily, with the ideals embodied by the flag and the music.
 
Posted by BannaOj (Member # 3206) on :
 
I've become very jaded and cynical, because of the recent doping scandals in cycling and the way the World Anti-Doping Association has handled things. For the most part it isn't the athletes, I agree. One of the more interesting bits will be if the rates of asthma attacks go up with the athletes because of the pollution, if there will be TUEs (exemptions submitted by doctors for the athletes to take particular drugs) and how they will be handled. Asthma drugs in particular are banned, yet they may be absolutely necessary given the pollution situation. Also WADA has a new EPO test (although not peer-reviewed because they don't believe in it) and it is likely they will nab high profile athletes for EPO in order to make a point.

The U.S. already has a swimmer in trouble for a doping violation, even though the substance was believed to be ingested via an unregulated supplement, the athlete is liable, not the supplement company. If the Chineese athletes get nailed for doping violations at the same rates the other countries do, I will be happy. If they don't, then once again the system is rigged.
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
quote:
If the Chineese athletes get nailed for doping violations at the same rates the other countries do, I will be happy. If they don't, then once again the system is rigged.
Yeah, I just assume that many Chinese athletes-- and athletes from a host of other countries-- are juiced. It doesn't matter. As long as the US gets and keeps its house in order, I don't mind losing. It's a big world, and we can't control it.
 
Posted by BannaOj (Member # 3206) on :
 
I don't know. I'm not sure that our house is any more in order than anybody else's. I hope it is, but I'm not sure.
 
Posted by T:man (Member # 11614) on :
 
hmmm Isn't the Olympics coming to Chicago in 2016?
 
Posted by Goody Scrivener (Member # 6742) on :
 
Chicago is a finalist city. It's not confirmed and from what I understand the decision isn't supposed to take place for another year.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
No. 2016 hasn't been decided yet.

2010 is Vancouver-Whistler, BC, Canada for the Winter games, then the next Summer games are in London, England in 2012. 2014 Winter games are in Sochi, which is a resort/luxury Black Sea coastal city in Russia.

2016 is down to I think four finalist cities, of which Chicago is one of. The other three are Tokyo, Japan, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and Madrid, Spain. Doha scored higher than Rio but was dropped for various reasons. Chicago scored third highest.

It's going to be interesting to see how they choose which city to host the games. If Rio won, it would be South America's first game. The IOC is trying to branch out more, considering three continents have dominated (monopolized really) the games over the years, with the single exception of Australia. But Rio scored lowest in the initial findings. Madrid would I think be the second Olympics for Spain, but it'd be four years after London had it, which would put them close together on the same continent, and the IOC likes to at least try and spread them around. America has hosted 8 games, more than anyone else, and it will have been 14 years since Salt Lake City, and 20 since the last summer games we held by the time 2016 rolls around. Japan hasn't had the games since Nagano.

Ultimately I think some of these timing and geography concerns will get swept under the carpet a bit and they'll focus on who has the best facilities, etc. Rio's only real draw at this point is that it would be the first SA city to host the games. But I think Tokyo probably has more of an inside track.

We'll find out in 15 months.
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
For some reason, Chicago seems like a really terrible place to have the Olympics. I don't know what it is (could just be my innate bias, having been raised in Wisconsin... [Wink] ), but... well... where would they put everything?
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
In their official application to the USOC, they said they'd have to build five new permanant venues and 11 temporary ones, combined with existing facilities for 27 total venues that would be primarily nestled with other buildings into four clusters that would serve the games and be within about 10 miles of the Olympic Village. Five of the 27 venues would be outside this range, but it isn't at all uncommon for some venues to be quite far away, as many were in Turin, Italy and will be in Vancouver-Whistler. The IOC was initially impressed by existing Chicago infrastructure, and the local citizenry seems to be on board. Much of the stuff that has to be built has already had funds pledged by private businesses, local groups and wealthy individuals. In addition to the buildings they know they'd have to make, Chicago has dozens of local sporting arenas and convention centers, which also includes the varios collegiate stadiums as well, plus the lakefront for beach and water events there. Rounding out their technical benefits is a strong transit system between the eleveted trains, two large airports and a metro system that snakes out into the surrounding towns, plus having ample hotel space. Those are the technical aspects, not all of what is graded in choosing a city, but Chicago ranks highly

Chicago is rumored to actually be a favorite among the cities. Rio lacks the infrastructure, Madrid is hurt by the London games being in Europe, and Tokyo by the Summer games now being held in Beijing. Much of it is rumors and hearsay. Rio's long shot seems to hinge on it's South American location. And anything from the war in Iraq to Bush leaving office could negatively or positively effect their decision.

Personally I hope Chicago gets it for two main reasons: 1. In eight years I should be both nearby and financially able to actually attend some Olympic events, so there's that personal angle. 2. After 2016, you're going to see a LOT more African, Asian and South American cities enter the mix with serious bids. Durbin and Johannesburg in South Africa are considered favorites well ahead of the actual process for the 2020 Olympics, and places like Doha and other Middle Eastern cities plan to redouble their efforts and India will probably snag a game in the next decade too. Many of these cities, and nations, have made great progress towards clawing their way out of the third world and deserve to be featured on the world's stage as hosts to this event. I can hardly say that Kenya doesn't deserve it, we should get it, especially since we've had it more than anyone else. I guess I sort of see 2016 as maybe our last chance to get in the mix for awhile, maybe even for a good 10 or 20 years. Everyone deserves a turn, but I sort of selfishly want one last hurrah in what will be the beginning of my middle agedness (I'll be 32 in 2016) before the games leave the US for a good long (and very much deserved) while.

Oh, and Carrie, as for "where would they put everything?" Many of the permanant or temporary structures are planned for either currently vacant lakefront property (for the Olympic Village, and those buildings would be sold as condos or rentals afterwards) or for temporary buildings in local parks.
 
Posted by ketchupqueen (Member # 6877) on :
 
Yeah, I'd think Tokyo would have more trouble "fitting stuff in" than Chicago.
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
quote:
For some reason, Chicago seems like a really terrible place to have the Olympics.
Honestly, Chicago seems to me to be a dream city for the Olympics. They would need to build an Olympic stadium because I'm pretty sure that Soldier Field isn't big enough, but with respect to Arenas and fields, between DePaul, Millennium Park, Washington Park, UChicago, Soldier field, Wrigley, Cellular Field, whereever the BlackHawks play,(this doesn't even include Northwestern) getting from Event to Event would be a breeze on a bicycle or on the El. I was in LA in '84, and I know the hours it took to get travel from events. Atlanta had the space but didn't have the infrastructure set-up. Chicago already has a healthy, skeletal set-up by happy accident.

[ July 29, 2008, 03:40 AM: Message edited by: Irami Osei-Frimpong ]
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
They've already decided that Soldier Field, while it would hold many events, including gold medal matches for various events, would not be the official Olympic Stadium. A new temporary stadium would be built, I think in Washington Park, and would be taken down after the games are over.
 
Posted by JennaDean (Member # 8816) on :
 
quote:
I sort of selfishly want one last hurrah in what will be the beginning of my middle agedness (I'll be 32 in 2016)
Hmph. Speak for yourself.

Oh, I guess you did. My middle agedness didn't start until I was at least 35.

[ July 29, 2008, 10:29 AM: Message edited by: JennaDean ]
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Heck, when I'm 32, I'll probably declare that I'm not yet middle aged.

However at 24, everything over 30 seems old. [Wink]
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
Well, there you go. Turns out - it is my innate bias against Chicagoland. [Smile]

But really, the only experience I have with anything Chicago (recently) is flying into ORD (only while landing on 22L/R) and seeing the skyline. It just doesn't look (to my very untrained eye) like there's enough room for the amount of crap they'd have to build. And where would the Bears go? Would they use Soldier Field/UI-C for training camp or the Olympics? (Not that I really care. [Wink] )

I asked a friend about the Olympics and Chicago, and he said "Yeah! That sounds like a great place for the Winter Olympics!" I goggled at him and said "Really? Where the heck would they ski?" He was appropriately abashed. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
Chicago is one of the best cities in the United States, you realize. [Smile]
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
Psht. Whatever. [Smile]
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Interesting piece of info, some events for the Beijing Olympics will be spread out over six cities, Shenyang, Tianjin, Qinghuangdao, Qingdao and Hong Kong.

Hong Kong is hosting the equestrian events (e.g. horse racing, which is very appropriate), Qingdao (home of Tsingtao beer) is doing sailing and was in the news recently for algae blooms which had to be cleared, and Shenyang is doing some of the soccer (an odd choice, as part of China's rust belt ... I was *not* impressed while passing through)

I very little about Tianjin and Qinghuangdao.
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
Wouldn't by hosting the event in a rust belt mean that they aren't forgotten?
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Iraq has been allowed to compete in the games. Due to the timing of their disallowal and subsequent reversal, they'll only have two atheletes actually competing, but at least one of them has a pretty compelling story of training in a war torn country.

Iran I think this year will feature their first ever female Olympian.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
BB: Perhaps, but after all the money and time spent in Beijing aimed at impressing foreigners, I just think Shenyang would be a bit contrary to that goal. (not that I necessarily mind)
 
Posted by Risuena (Member # 2924) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
Hong Kong is hosting the equestrian events (e.g. horse racing, which is very appropriate)

Except horse racing isn't an Olympic sport.

And while I don't think it's unusual for cities near the Olympic host city to hold some events, it does seem like a bunch of those are pretty far from Beijing.
 
Posted by Omega M. (Member # 7924) on :
 
I have to say, the only Olympic sports I like to watch are those with cute female athletes. (Fortunately, those are exactly the sports that my girlfriend likes, too!) Anybody else feel this way, in relation to females or males?
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Risuena: Good point. Well ... I'm confident Hong Kong people will find some way to bet on it nonetheless [Smile]
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Omega M.:
I have to say, the only Olympic sports I like to watch are those with cute female athletes. (Fortunately, those are exactly the sports that my girlfriend likes, too!) Anybody else feel this way, in relation to females or males?

*cough*Men's swimming, beach volleyball*cough*

[Wink]
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Beach volleyball for sure, but I really like watching nearly all the events. If a girl tries to browbeat you away from watching women's beach volleyball just say that we're gold medal favorites this year and you're supporting your country.

Risuena -

Sometimes it's like that. I think one of the events in Turin's Winter games 2 years ago was actually in Switzerland. I can't remember for sure, but it was really far away. I remember one of those skiing events was actually postponed because the road from Turin to the far away place was washed out for a day after a heavy snowfall. Vancouver's games in two years are being shared more or less with Whistler, which was actually a bit of a deal since they had to embark on a major construction project to widen and enhance the road linking the two cities. It's sort of technically against the spirit of the games since only a single city can actually apply, you can't apply as a metropolitan region or even apply using far away cities, but there are so many other factors that often it's all sort of thrown together. But it happens all the time.

In other news -

The Olympic village opened last week to fanfare...and complaints. The press is pissed because their internet access is being censored, disallowing some sites like Amnesty International. They access to parts of the country, promised by China before the games to be open, is highly restricted. Many are crying foul at what looks like a broken promise from China, who said before getting the games that they'd allow free press access without censorship, but lo and behold we find that this current situation was actually negotiated by the IOC itself, who is fully aware of the situation and in fact signed off on it. Part of the IOC's original justification for choosing China despite concerns over their human rights record among other things was that this would push them to be more open and fair, and they follow that up with signing rules that do the exact opposite of that reasoning.

On the flip side, I heard an interview with a BBC correspondent the other day who said that for the first time he was allowed to cover a Chinese gay rights protest, and even to interview the protestors and activists. But he also said that they were denied access to a food market of all places. It seems to be a grab bag of mixed responses. Thus far, it appears that many of the promises of the IOC and China have really been pretty empty. However it'll be impossible to tell what will happen during the games in regards to coverage, and for that matter what sort of long term benefits we might see from this. I think if nothing comes of it though, China should have to do more before the games next time to prove they deserve them.
 
Posted by T:man (Member # 11614) on :
 
Even 24 is old to me. By 2016 hopefully I'll be in a good financial situation and I'll be able to go.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Lyrhawn: I'd have to respectfully disagree with the last two sentences, although I suspect it has much to do with what metric you're using to judge success. If the metric is "Has <host city> been a positive choice in hosting a sports-friendly and politically free Olympics compared to the other possible hosts?" then my conclusion would be much the same as yours.

If the metric is "Has <host city> been a positive choice for the Olympics in causing positive social, political, and environmental change compared to the other possible hosts?" then the conclusion, as I have mentioned before, is that this has been an awesome choice.

To illustrate this point, let's look at the other possible host cities.
http://www.olympic.org/uk/games/beijing/election_uk.asp
Excepting Istanbul (for which I simply have too little knowledge on to comment) all of the other cities are relatively modern, cosmopolitan, and developed. As a proud Canadian, if Beijing had been eliminated and Toronto as the second-place contender had been picked, I'm sure we would have been a good choice as the first metric. However, it would not really change the second metric aside from maybe finally getting our waterfront re-developed and providing impetus to complete one (singular) subway line.

On the other hand, having the Olympics in Beijing has been the catalyst for all sorts of changes both negative (temporary increased oppression of activists during the games, relocation of families to build venues, providing a trigger for the riots in Tibet, etc.) versus the positive (the wholesale relocation of many factories outside the capital, building three subway lines, ensuring a speedy and efficient reaction to the Sichuan Earthquake). On the balance, these changes have been very positive and beyond the ability of any other city to match.

In fact, I would assert that the effect of the Olympics on the governmental and citizen response to the Sichuan Earthquake alone is responsible for saving thousands (if not tens of thousands) of lives and enough to justify Beijing as a good choice for host city (in hindsight).
 
Posted by Omega M. (Member # 7924) on :
 
I heard today that China allegedly has underage girls on its women's gymnastics team (they're 14, and the minimum age is 16). But the country might not be using them simply because they're, say, more flexible; a former Soviet gymnast now on the Olympic committee for the sport says that younger girls are less fearful of performing dangerous moves. Which I suppose works wonderfully until one of the girls learns the hard way why they're dangerous.
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
The underage thing is not going to be a problem, because China provided the IOC with passports that stated the girls were 16, and that's the end of that. [Roll Eyes]

I don't know about the less fearful vs. less flexible thing. I mean, fear can hit you at any point in training in gymnastics. And most kids as young as six have seen catastrophic injuries in the gym. My daughter is a competitive gymnast - certainly not Olympic caliber, but still. And we've seen terrible injuries occur in the gym, but it's not what you think. Usually it's a misplaced ankle, or one knee turned wrong on one landing out of thousands. One girl broke her thumb doing a handstand on the beam - a move girls as young as four do and one this girl, who was 11, had done thousands of time without incident. She misplaced her thumb one time - it broke so badly she could never return to gymnastics.

So, I disagree that younger girls are less fearful, honestly. Every gymnast has seen injury happen and knows it can happen on ANY move, not just the flashy, exciting, dangerous-looking ones.

What I do see in our gym, however, is that gymnastics becomes much harder to do when the girl hits puberty. A developed body with breasts and a woman's curves is a lot harder to flip around in the air. There's a reason most successful gymnasts look like girls instead of women - it gets much harder when you have a fully developed body. Also, height makes a big difference. Tall gymnasts have to work much, much harder. Think about pulling your legs up and around the bar - it's much easier if those legs are short vs. long. My daughter excels on the bars - mainly because she's very short and compact, and finds it easy to swing around. Her best friend is six inches taller than her - and struggles mightily and one of the main reasons, according to her coach, is her height. The physics people out there can probably tell us exactly why a 4'8" person has an easier time swinging all the way around a bar vs. someone who is 5'4".

I don't really buy the fear issue - I think it's simply an issue of physicality. It's better if the girls are flat chested and small, and that's more likely to occur in pre-pubescent girls.
 
Posted by fugu13 (Member # 2859) on :
 
Angular momentum is just summing all the mass of a person weighted by the distance from the center of rotation. So adding 10% in distance from the center is the same (for rotation) as making your body weight considerably more, and thus harder to move.
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
quote:
I don't know about the less fearful vs. less flexible thing.
I think the advantage goes to flexibility side, just barely. Flexibility improves so many sightlines, and improves balance in such myriad ways. Then again, one of my buddies competed through college, and never did get over her earnest fear of the vault.

[ August 03, 2008, 05:54 PM: Message edited by: Irami Osei-Frimpong ]
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
But I'm not sure that flexibility decreases that much between 14 and 18, say. Not for a competitive gymnast, who vigorously works to maintain her flexibility every day.

Does it decrease that much in those years? I don't know my physiology and anatomy well enough to say.

However, puberty and the accompanying development in breast, hips, and elsewhere certainly can cause major changes between 14 and 18.

Of course, in America, many girls begin developing well before 14. Although, a highly toned athlete with very low body fat can delay puberty.

So, I'm not sure. But I don't think the flexibility decreases all that much if you keep at it. As for the fear, well like I said, it can strike any time and be related to any event. My daughter has no fear of the bars - none. She loves them, and would stay on them every night until her hands bled. Actually, wait - she's done that! Yet, one particular move on the beam frightens her, and it's a really simple little jump. But, she fell on that jump when she was six years old, and hurt herself pretty badly, and ever since that one move gives her pause. She can do it, but you can tell on her face when she goes into it that it bothers her.

As for vault, well, honestly you're running full speed at a large, stationary object - most sane people would be fearful! Vault is another one my daughter loves, but I can certainly understand being fearful of it. Some girls in our gym hate to vault - one actually tries to hide when the coach moves them to vault!
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
Well, our athletes do have some things to be legitimately concerned about.

What have the Chinese planned for our athletes??!? [Eek!]
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Thought this would be interesting, there have been several articles on Beijing's campaign to make Beijing more hospitable to waiguoren, here is an example:

quote:

Etiquette experts have long advised hosts to avoid discussing politics and religion. But salaries, love lives and health are also off limits during the Olympics, as Beijing's courtesy campaign reaches its final stages.

For three years or more, officials have been training residents to be on their best behaviour, launching drives against spitting, smoking and swearing and encouraging locals to form orderly queues.
...
"It is normal for Chinese to ask people they just met such questions, but foreigners respond negatively," said Wang Zhaoqian, a spokeswoman for the Beijing municipal government.

"By educating locals, we hope that they will become more socially sensitive when communicating with visitors."

Another poster warns against using phrases such as "it's up there" when talking to anyone visually impaired, or "it's behind you" to disabled athletes. It recommends comments such as: "You are really great."

Deference to foreign sensitivities is such that volunteers have even been warned against using rap music as the ringtone on their mobile phones lest they offend visitors, China Daily reported.

Officials also warned today that they would not tolerate "obscene, sexual, superstitious or base" adverts over the Olympic period, saying they could affect the national image. Adverts for cigarettes and products that claim to improve sexual performance are off limits.

link

As a fun comparison, here is one used by the Bush delegation to Canada:
quote:

Among the advice: how to decipher what Canadians mean when they put "eh?" at the end of a sentence.

"Eh," the guide helpfully explained, is pronounced "ay."

"Used mostly in rural areas," it states, the word roughly translates as "You know?" or "Isn't it?"

The guide, prepared by the U.S. Office of the Chief of Protocol, also notes that "Canadians, for the most part, place importance on education, skill, modesty and politeness."

In a section on "social customs and courtesies," designed to prevent members of the delegation from accidentally giving offence, the report advises that:

- "On being introduced the customary greetings are: firm handshake, customary "Hello," or "Bonjour" in Quebec.

- "During conversation remove sunglasses."

- "While indoors remove hats."

The document states that "most Canadian gestures are the same as those used in the United States" but adds there are some exceptions, including:

- "To call someone to you, use the entire hand rather than the index finger."

- "In Quebec, the thumbs down sign is considered offensive."

link

I find it interesting in part because one can see what kind of odd cultural misunderstandings can arise even when one is making an effort to be sensitive to others.
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
wouldn't it be Meiguoren?
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
No, like laowai or gweilo, thats the kind of (potentially) impolite description that they're trying to avoid [Wink]
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
I thought it meant "American", thats what my phrase book tells me.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Exactly
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
US loses two more gymnasts with only a day to go until the opening ceremonies.
 
Posted by Shanna (Member # 7900) on :
 
Random question but is it typical for US television stations to rerun the Olympic opening ceremonies? I have circuit training at the dojo on Friday night for the tournament next weekend, but I'm sad that I'll miss the opening ceremony especially the performance by the Shaolin monks.

Or I'm guessing it'll be available as streaming video on a few news websites?
 
Posted by pooka (Member # 5003) on :
 
I think they sell a video of it, so it's less likely to be available for rebroadcast.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
On that note, if anyone knows of an online webcast which will be live tomorrow morning that would be appreciated. The technologically backward CBC doesn't seem to have plans for a live feed online.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Sometimes they rebroadcast it immediately after the first showing. Actual events don't start until the next morning anyway so that's a lot of down time.

Does anyone know where I can find a full schedule of events and which ones will be televised, when, and on what channel? I know there's TV guide, but NBC is showing their Olympics coverage on like six different channels.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
NBC Olympics has a great section where you type in your zip code and tell them your cable provider and then they spit out a schedule with all the different stations, what events are being televised, and a schedule of the events that are available for streaming over the internet. It's pretty cool and covers everything.

And they are showing the opening ceremonies again at like 1am here, so probably everywhere else too. I might watch, but they'll already have rowing and other things available to be watched, and I don't want to miss that. I wonder if they'll put up anything on the big screens at work. It IS a sports bar. [Smile]
 
Posted by aspectre (Member # 2222) on :
 
Actually, CBC is streaming live video of the 8pm Beijing time OpeningCeremony at 4am Vancouver time / 7am Ottawa time. Pre-opening coverage begins at 2:45am Vancouver / 5:45 Ottawa.
And the Canadian feed is apparently blocked to US residents. So how come the news media ain't screaming about Internet censorship by the US and Canada???

Near as I can tell from a quick look at their NBCOlympics.com schedules, the NatteringBombasticCretins will be pretending that the OpeningCeremony occurs about 16hours later.

[ August 08, 2008, 10:16 AM: Message edited by: aspectre ]
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Curses, I must have missed the notice on the CBC website last night. Oh well, probably better to watch it on HD tonight after work anyways.

Edit to add: Watched the CCTV1 webcast with a bunch of coworkers for the lighting of the flame live. Will probably be seeing either the CBC or CCTV HD broadcast later tonight since what I did see was fairly funky.

[ August 08, 2008, 01:36 PM: Message edited by: Mucus ]
 
Posted by BannaOj (Member # 3206) on :
 
I think some of you know that I've followed the Floyd Landis case pretty extensively, and still think Floyd is innocent, regardless of the CAS (Court of Arbitration for Sport) decision. The data provided by the laboratory is a travesty in a bunch of ways.


On the eve of the Olympics (and I believe the timing is deliberate) An analysis of that data was published by a biostatician named Donald Berry in Nature this month.

In addition, Nature came out with an extremely strong editorial statement, on the crappy science that is being done in the name of "Anti doping".

Here's the link
quote:
Nature believes that accepting 'legal limits' of specific metabolites without such rigorous verification goes against the foundational standards of modern science, and results in an arbitrary test for which the rate of false positives and false negatives can never be known. By leaving these rates unknown, and by not publishing and opening to broader scientific scrutiny the methods by which testing labs engage in study, it is Nature's view that the anti-doping authorities have fostered a sporting culture of suspicion, secrecy and fear.
Wow, just wow. Unfortunately it's too late for Floyd. And the people who were judging him, didn't really care how statistically valid the test actually was.

So view all so-called "drug tests" from Bejing with a healthy dose of skepticism. This is not to say that people aren't doping. But the tests that are attempting to catch them aren't scientifically validated to a degree of confidence that they won't catch innocent people in the process. And the innocent have no recourse, because of the way the rules have been written.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Some quick comments after viewing the CBC and NBC broadcasts of the opening ceremonies (looks like the CCTV broadcast isn't allowed in Canada for exclusive broadcast rights reasons)

CBC:
* Crummy video angles and sound. I wonder if CCTV handles all of the video recording and sound and then resells it to the various tv channels around the world. CBC must have cheaped out and got the "economy" package. I didn't even see some nice touches that I saw in the NBC package
* The city night flyby with fireworks was spectacular and especially nostalgic
* Holy crap lots of people use flash cameras when there is little hope of the flash making a difference, oy

NBC:
* Is that a song from 'Batman Begins' accompanying the video of American athletes? Is that Plunkett and Macclean?
* Definitely had better camera angles and sound quality
* One ommission due to ads, there was a really nice and stylish video depicting the paper making process which segued into the scroll opening up to the artistic ceremony
* A thought occurs, holy crap that thats a lot of good logistics, organization, and timing.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Anyone watching?

I've got badmitton reruns on USA on the TV and the men's air pistol finals on my computer streaming from the website. I love the additional coverage this year [Smile]

Edit to add:

Aw! US Men finish 4th and 5th in air pistol and miss a medal by a point. So close! US women finished in 4th place and missed a medal by a point too with air rifle.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
One American killed and another injured, along with a Chinese tourist guide in freak attack during Olympics
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
Mucus:

While watching the Olympics I and the people I was with were trying to figure out where the feed comes from. Obviously there were Chinese cameramen on the ground, and I presume that each station received a feed of the various cameras which they could switch between. How much freedom they had I'm not sure. During the carrying of the flame it looked like they couldn't have more than two options. You could see the camera men passing off to each other and that switch must have been prearranged at the Chinese end- there was a brief mistake during one switch off as the cameraman due to take the final leg wasn't ready. (They edited it out the final version).

At certain points, CBC had a split screen focused on their Olympians, so they probably had their own cameras as well. I think these extra cameras probably made the difference. CBC showed the NBC tent- complete with many air conditioners. CBC was up in a stairwell, presumably filming through glass to get their own shots of the Canadians.

It was not likely due to getting the 'economy' package, but simply due to being a less important film crew. I assume they all received the same choices of official cameras.

All in all, the only difference in angles would be the personalized shots or in the directors choice of the angles. NBC, being outside and further down, would get a clear shot. CBC, behind glass and higher up, had a more difficult shot.

I do agree that CBC was a little wobbly, as Peter Mansbridge or the Sports Person (they sounded the same) did get left behind country-wise and end up talking about a different country than we were seeing on the screen, saying that certain countries got a cheer that was actually intended by the crowd for the country after them. Presumably this was due to their difficulty in seeing and they did seem to rectify this problem later on.
 
Posted by ketchupqueen (Member # 6877) on :
 
I caught the Parade of Countries and torch lighting. I got a kick out of seeing big Yao Ming with little Lin Hao walking alongside, and later on his arm, leaning over to hear the excited little boy's excited exclaimations over the torch lighting and fireworks. That was a sweet picture.
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
Mucus:

While watching the Olympics I and the people I was with were trying to figure out where the feed comes from. Obviously there were Chinese cameramen on the ground, and I presume that each station received a feed of the various cameras which they could switch between. How much freedom they had I'm not sure. During the carrying of the flame it looked like they couldn't have more than two options. You could see the camera men passing off to each other and that switch must have been prearranged at the Chinese end- there was a brief mistake during one switch off as the cameraman due to take the final leg wasn't ready. (They edited it out the final version).

At certain points, CBC had a split screen focused on their Olympians, so they probably had their own cameras as well. I think these extra cameras probably made the difference. CBC showed the NBC tent- complete with many air conditioners. CBC was up in a stairwell, presumably filming through glass to get their own shots of the Canadians.

It was not likely due to getting the 'economy' package, but simply due to being a less important film crew. I assume they all received the same choices of official cameras.

All in all, the only difference in angles would be the personalized shots or in the directors choice of the angles. NBC, being outside and further down, would get a clear shot. CBC, behind glass and higher up, had a more difficult shot.

I do agree that CBC was a little wobbly, as Peter Mansbridge or the Sports Person (they sounded the same) did get left behind country-wise and end up talking about a different country than we were seeing on the screen, saying that certain countries got a cheer that was actually intended by the crowd for the country after them. Presumably this was due to their difficulty in seeing and they did seem to rectify this problem later on.

Also: Please note that the NBC broadcast was not done live. They may have done it live to tape but presumably had more editing abilities available to them. CBC was doing it live. That tends to cause more mistakes, because you have to guess what's going to be the best picture ahead of time rather than being able to see it.
 
Posted by Joldo (Member # 6991) on :
 
Stunning opening ceremonies. There's a glorious art and artifice to everything they did, and I don't think I've ever seen an Olympics quite so awe-inspiring. Especially the dancers drawing on the giant sheet of paper.

Interesting messages behind everything they said. There was more than a touch of fear and awe to my reaction. China's saying that they're a powerhouse--they have the people and they will use them. Good messages about opennness and environmental awareness, at least. I have the feeling that this is China presenting its new image for itself. The symbols it set forth in the Olympics will be the image China tries to establish on the world stage from now on. Openness, yes, and sustainability, but also a vast united population.

Notice that the mayor of Beijing's speech referenced the Century of Humiliation and implied that this ceremony marked the end of it. That's like saying "We've been kowtowing to the West, but we're not going to any longer". If the past few decades have been kowtowing, I'm wondering what it'll be like when they stop.

Incredible attention to detail! The patterns formed in the printing blocks (especially the royal milkdrop, jeez) were absolutely mindblowing, especially since they were all done by individual people.

And costumes, good gracious.

By the way, the U.S. totally failed on national costume. Yes, the yacht club outfit looks so cool when Spain is dressed up in red and yellow suits with cowboy hats! Jeez, Ralph Lauren, you couldn't be a bit more creative?

And who made the decision to seat Laura Bush between her Georgie and Vladimir Putin? I swear she had to botox that smile on for it to stick all the way through the opening ceremonies.

The little kid with Yao Ming was possibly the most adorable thing I've seen, ever.

You notice sometimes the anouncers seem kinda snide? "This must be an incredible moment for the Andorran athletes: looking around the stadium, there are 20,000 more people present here than there are in their entire country". I do wish they'd stop pointing out all the nations that have never won medals at all. It's a very base thing to do.

But my god, what a disappointment the torch-lighting was. Maybe nothing can compare to Mohammed Ali or to shooting an arrow into the basin, but really, this was sad.

I do so very wish I had been there to see all of this in person.
 
Posted by ketchupqueen (Member # 6877) on :
 
Joldo, the only translation I got of the speech was a quick summary that I gather was rather cleaned up. Do you have a link to a full translation so I can read the real speech?

I actually was rather impressed with the torch lighting, at least the part leading up to it; it looked like it took a lot of work to make that running-in-midair motion, and he did it all the way around the stadium. But I think you're right in that it was a very symbolic, over-the-top show of POWER, making the torch appear over the top of the wall, hoisting the guy around-- rather than elegant simplicity like some of the cooler torch-lightings in the past.
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
Where can I see the Opening Ceremonies after the fact? do they keep it online somewhere?
 
Posted by Joldo (Member # 6991) on :
 
KQ: I can't find a translation right now. NBC had a full translation in their broadcast, and maybe they'll still have that right now.

But yes, I do agree. The torch-lighting is far better when it is powerful in its simplicity. Simply striking. Seeing a man lifted up by wires loses some of the drama and beauty of past lightings.
 
Posted by Starsnuffer (Member # 8116) on :
 
... The nbc channel I watched just had the guy speaking chinese, then every once in a while the announcers would give a summary of the last few sentences. After the opening ceremonies I was watching some Judo(no idea how that is scored, but apparently dropping a guy on his head wins you the match. An american guy lost that way). The cycling road race (152 miles) was on also. It's so strange how they are allowed to just chuck their waterbottles and wrappers and stuff off their bikes. Some sailing was on also, but I couldn't tell if they were even moving yet... so I wasn't really interested. Badminton is fun to watch, also. I set an alarm to wake up at like 5 to see the end of the road race but slept through it [Frown] . Anyway. I'm looking forward to more olympics in the days to come
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
I watched some of the women's sabre fencing early early this morning (well, okay, it was late last night), and it was amazing. I was very happy to see that the US women swept the medals in the event, because there was some absolutely amazing fencing going on in their earlier bouts.
 
Posted by ketchupqueen (Member # 6877) on :
 
quote:
... The nbc channel I watched just had the guy speaking chinese, then every once in a while the announcers would give a summary of the last few sentences.
That's exactly what I saw in the NBC broadcast. I watched the rebroadcast but it shouldn't have made a difference...
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Carrie:
I watched some of the women's sabre fencing early early this morning (well, okay, it was late last night), and it was amazing. I was very happy to see that the US women swept the medals in the event, because there was some absolutely amazing fencing going on in their earlier bouts.

Yeah....I bet Mackillian is ecstatic.
 
Posted by Starsnuffer (Member # 8116) on :
 
Maybe it helps to have some background in fencing to enjoy it, but to me it is all so absurdly fast it looks the same time after time. Eh, it just seems like it should take on average more than a second to hit the other person.
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
Mucus:

While watching the Olympics I and the people I was with were trying to figure out where the feed comes from. Obviously there were Chinese cameramen on the ground, and I presume that each station received a feed of the various cameras which they could switch between. How much freedom they had I'm not sure. During the carrying of the flame it looked like they couldn't have more than two options. You could see the camera men passing off to each other and that switch must have been prearranged at the Chinese end- there was a brief mistake during one switch off as the cameraman due to take the final leg wasn't ready. (They edited it out the final version).

At certain points, CBC had a split screen focused on their Olympians, so they probably had their own cameras as well. I think these extra cameras probably made the difference. CBC showed the NBC tent- complete with many air conditioners. CBC was up in a stairwell, presumably filming through glass to get their own shots of the Canadians.

It was not likely due to getting the 'economy' package, but simply due to being a less important film crew. I assume they all received the same choices of official cameras.

All in all, the only difference in angles would be the personalized shots or in the directors choice of the angles. NBC, being outside and further down, would get a clear shot. CBC, behind glass and higher up, had a more difficult shot.

I do agree that CBC was a little wobbly, as Peter Mansbridge or the Sports Person (they sounded the same) did get left behind country-wise and end up talking about a different country than we were seeing on the screen, saying that certain countries got a cheer that was actually intended by the crowd for the country after them. Presumably this was due to their difficulty in seeing and they did seem to rectify this problem later on.

Also: Please note that the NBC broadcast was not done live. They may have done it live to tape but presumably had more editing abilities available to them. CBC was doing it live. That tends to cause more mistakes, because you have to guess what's going to be the best picture ahead of time rather than being able to see it.
 
Posted by Starsnuffer (Member # 8116) on :
 
May and Walsh beach volley ball is on Vs. Japan right now. Fun to watch, and they're doing well. The announcers said that (at least) one of the Japanese women played against May and Walsh in her first game at the Athens Olympics and feel "very unlucky" for it. Men's swimming will be on later also
 
Posted by Starsnuffer (Member # 8116) on :
 
So if you're in the olympics and you don't win a medal do you get a certificate or something that says "I made it to the olympics at least..."?
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Teshi: Actually, I didn't notice who did editing when, if NBC had more time to do their editing that would be a pretty good explanation. Still, it was especially obvious during the drumming portion of the beginning, CBC either was offered worse camera angles or they just chose poorly.
I also wasn't a fan of CBC sound setup, lots of echoes and pretty low quality.

Joldo: The announcers did stretch for remarks, but I think its forgivable and harmless since they pretty much have to say "something" for each country. It did get sad, I remember for one country it was like "Oh, they filmed Gladiator there" and another was "Madonna adopted a child there."
I think it is worth pointing out the population thing, when I saw Hong Kong come out I was like "is it really worth a separate team for that?" And then I saw like 30+ teams that were smaller than Hong Kong. When you come from a small country, not just the stadium, but Beijing as a whole must be quite the cultural shock.
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
quote:
Joldo: The announcers did stretch for remarks, but I think its forgivable and harmless since they pretty much have to say "something" for each country. It did get sad, I remember for one country it was like "Oh, they filmed Gladiator there" and another was "Madonna adopted a child there."
I'm sure most TV stations managed to, oh I don't know, do some research. CBC was saying the country's name, flag bearer and his or her sport and a little story about him or her and relation to Canada, if any. Yeah, it was a little Canada-centric, but clearly they had done some thinking.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
*Shrug* The Gladiator and Madonna thing was off NBC.
Maybe they did their research off Wikipedia, "In Popular Culture" [Wink]
 
Posted by Starsnuffer (Member # 8116) on :
 
I was watching the opening ceremony with my jewish friend and her mom and when palestine came up in the parade of nations they were like "well that's strange... because palestine is not a country." Isn't it a country, though? Isn't that why it's called the "israeli-palestinian conlflict" at times? hrm
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Neither is Hong Kong or Puerto Rico, perhaps they allow for some local leeway in determining what can form a team or not.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Guam, American Samoa, and the Virgin Islands all have competing teams, as well as a dozen Pacific Island chains that I'd never heard of before.

I think Palestine is fair game to have their own team. Who else would they compete for? Israel? I don't see that happening.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
Can I just say when I watched the woman's weight lifting and heard the mainlanders cheering quite loudly for the Taiwanese athlete I almost lost it. I'm really enjoying these Olympics so far.
 
Posted by brojack17 (Member # 9189) on :
 
The mens 4 X 100M Freestyle just finishe and the USA team beat out the trash talking French. What a beautiful race.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
BB: I'm not entirely surprised by that for a number of reasons. Although I *do* find it quite nice and heartening nonetheless.

I would judge the probability of non-cheering between the mainland and either the French or the Germans to be higher than Taiwan actually, barring any intentional provocations.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by brojack17:
The mens 4 X 100M Freestyle just finishe and the USA team beat out the trash talking French. What a beautiful race.

That was an AMAZING race. I can't believe the last few seconds when they were neck and neck, and I can't believe how much they all smashed the record by.

Stunning.

And this was supposed to be the biggest potential hurdle for Phelps in his quest to beat Spitz's record. I think you could see his relief in his intense reaction.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
BB: I'm not entirely surprised by that for a number of reasons. Although I *do* find it quite nice and heartening nonetheless.

I would judge the probability of non-cheering between the mainland and either the French or the Germans to be higher than Taiwan actually, barring any intentional provocations.

I figured you'd say as much. I wasn't SURPRISED by it, just happy to see the comradery.
 
Posted by brojack17 (Member # 9189) on :
 
They said this suit would make records fall. I guess it's working. All three teams on the podium broke the old world record that was set by the US relay qualifying team.
 
Posted by Threads (Member # 10863) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lyrhawn:
quote:
Originally posted by brojack17:
The mens 4 X 100M Freestyle just finishe and the USA team beat out the trash talking French. What a beautiful race.

That was an AMAZING race. I can't believe the last few seconds when they were neck and neck, and I can't believe how much they all smashed the record by.

Stunning.

And this was supposed to be the biggest potential hurdle for Phelps in his quest to beat Spitz's record. I think you could see his relief in his intense reaction.

Yea, that was super intense at the end. The reactions of the U.S team after the race were hilarious. They could have easily been actors in 300.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
BB: What do you mean you figured? [Razz]
But yeah, indeed.
 
Posted by imogen (Member # 5485) on :
 
The race was great. The US team's performance was superb, especially the last touch.

I do feel sorry for the French team - to be so far ahead and have it lost.

And go Australian bronze. [Smile] (Wasn't Eammon Sullivan's leg amazing?)
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
I do sort of feel sorry for the French team. They were visibly crushed at the end. Buuuut, I'd feel more sorry for them if they hadn't been trash talking before hand. [Smile]

quote:
They said this suit would make records fall. I guess it's working. All three teams on the podium broke the old world record that was set by the US relay qualifying team.
Actually the top five finishing teams all beat the world record. Pretty amazing race when the guy two spots out from the Bronze still beats the world record.
 
Posted by Shanna (Member # 7900) on :
 
quote:
The reactions of the U.S team after the race were hilarious. They could have easily been actors in 300.
I can't wait to share that observation with my brother. He's a huge 300 fan.

Ah, but I was dying because NBC kept playing their reaction in slow-motion! It just made it that much more dramatic and hilarious.
 
Posted by brojack17 (Member # 9189) on :
 
I didn't feel sorry for the French team. They were crushed but that is what happens when you get overconfident and run your mouth. Plus, they're French. [Smile]
 
Posted by brojack17 (Member # 9189) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Threads:
quote:
Originally posted by Lyrhawn:
quote:
Originally posted by brojack17:
The mens 4 X 100M Freestyle just finishe and the USA team beat out the trash talking French. What a beautiful race.

That was an AMAZING race. I can't believe the last few seconds when they were neck and neck, and I can't believe how much they all smashed the record by.

Stunning.

And this was supposed to be the biggest potential hurdle for Phelps in his quest to beat Spitz's record. I think you could see his relief in his intense reaction.

Yea, that was super intense at the end. The reactions of the U.S team after the race were hilarious. They could have easily been actors in 300.
I didn't think about that. Looking back, that's so true. [Smile]
 
Posted by Starsnuffer (Member # 8116) on :
 
I don't know why everyone likes to make a big deal that the French said they'd "smash" the Americans. I'd be disappointed if an olympian said something like I'll humbly try to do my best and perhaps I'll swim faster than my competition. It's just not nearly so exciting. It perhaps was worded, or translated, a more more maliciously than he originally intended(if it was translated.. it probably was at least inside his head), but I appreciate the intensity.

That said, that was an amazing race. Absurd.

The gymnastics was so amazing also, just in general. Other notable things I saw today, a sweet 3 game match of beach volleyball between china and Greece, a crushing match of badminton between china and Taiwan. The olympics are just so interesting. Oh also saw the end of the bronze medal shotgun trap shootout, that was cool.
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
That was a simply astonishing relay race. Just... brilliant. My Canadian friend and I were going insane at the end of it.
 
Posted by Elmer's Glue (Member # 9313) on :
 
My favorite part that I have seen so far was Women's Fencing. All medals went to USA.
The French swim team all looked like such jerks to me.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
They actually didn't seem all that bad. They were confident, it's not like the US Olympic team is short on confident atheletes. They were favored to win, they really wanted it, and that much was evident in the looks on their faces when they lost the gold by inches.

But when they got to the podium they were all smiles and all waves. Sometimes I think the measure of a person is more in how they recover from a defeat than in how they achieved a victory. They shook hands afterwards, they sucked it up, they're still Olympic champions and I think they accepted that.

Besides, without them, that race wouldn't have been nearly so exciting, and probably wouldn't have even been as fast. I think we needed that push to really eke out ever hundreth of a second.
 
Posted by imogen (Member # 5485) on :
 
I agree completely Lyrhawn.


**

Arrogance in victory is very unattractive. (Both in athletes and their supporters.)
 
Posted by Elmer's Glue (Member # 9313) on :
 
It was when they were at the podium that I thought they looked like jerks.
 
Posted by JennaDean (Member # 8816) on :
 
Lezak was amazing!!! He was still behind when he got to the red zone. Cannot believe it, especially after the commentators were talking about how it couldn't be done.

And the French and even the Australians completely smashed the world record, too. Wow.

Everyone's talking about how this makes Michael Phelps' dream of winning 8 golds possible, but Phelps came in second in his leg. It was Lezak who won that gold for him!
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
I think there is a profound difference between confidence and trash talking.

I'm perfectly fine with confidence. Look at the following:

"If we swim our best, we can beat anybody in the world. "

"We're going to smash the Americans."

One is an expression of confidence, and is perfectly true - the French WERE the favorites, and there is no doubt that swimming their best, they can beat our team. The second is trash-talking, and it rubs me the wrong way.

It also can come back and bite you, as it appears the US relay team all heard about those comments and were fired up by them.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Belle:
I don't really buy the fear issue - I think it's simply an issue of physicality. It's better if the girls are flat chested and small, and that's more likely to occur in pre-pubescent girls.

A view from the Canadian gymnastics team in the conservative Canadian National Post:
quote:

The Canadian women's team has been in a practice group with the Chinese during the Olympic competition. "Those girls I see at the gym look eligible to me," Orchard said. "They are magnificent gymnasts. I could sit there all day and watch them.

"Their physique is even smaller than the typical North American child, so it is [exacerbated] even more. They are the best in the world, especially on bars and beam, but they are just tinier people."

In fact, the minimum age in Olympic gymnastics has been raised from 14 to 15, to 16 over the years, as those outside the sport grew concerned with the work regimen demanded of 12-and 13-year-olds in preparation for the Games.

"It's difficult to understand our sport. The physique is so different," Orchard said. "To my mind, 15 is the perfect age.

"In this sport, we do select very tiny packages. Even in Canada you have girls where you go, 'Oh my God. They look like they're only 10.' They're 15."

http://www.nationalpost.com/sports/beijing-games/story.html?id=715967

To be honest, it comes as no surprise to me that Westerners would underestimate the age of Chinese girls. It works the other way too, we often over estimate ages for people here.

(To make it clear, I have no doubt that some of the girls may be underage, but for other reasons. The incredible ease of individual bribery and the pressure to commit collaborative corruption. But my main point is that it is not easy to tell just by looking especially if the accusation is from a biased competitor)

[ August 11, 2008, 01:17 PM: Message edited by: Mucus ]
 
Posted by breyerchic04 (Member # 6423) on :
 
I just heard that no one died in the Cross Country horse event! WTG Olympic planners, you made a possible course.
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
quote:
(To make it clear, I have no doubt that some of the girls may be underage, but for other reasons. The incredible ease of individual bribery and the pressure to commit collaborative corruption. But my main point is that it is not easy to tell just by looking especially if the accusation is from a biased competitor)

It's not just about looking, however - there are reports from Chinese newspapers that state some of these girls are younger than they should be.

There's more to the age controversy than just "Oh, she looks too young to be sixteen!"

People have found articles from two years ago that describe a girl as 12. Then, suddenly she ages four years in two years?

I have no doubt that it's difficult to estimate the age of people, especially an ethnic group other than your own. Still, there is more than just looks to make people believe some of these girls are underage.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Sure, and conflicting records are a better guide than looks.

However, I was more referring to this quote in the article:
quote:

Bela Karolyi, former coach to Nadia Comaneci and Mary Lou Retton, now coaches the pixies of the United States team. He spoke out last week about the Chinese.

"This is a joke," he said. "We are people who have had children of our own, so we know what a 16-year-old should look like. They should not look like they are seven and maybe still in diapers."

Even if they are 14, thats like Grade 8 or 9 which is a far cry from age 7. Especially the 'diapers' remark smacks of bitterness.
 
Posted by T:man (Member # 11614) on :
 
The race was intense.

Can't wait to see phelps again later today!
 
Posted by imogen (Member # 5485) on :
 
I just saw the 200m freestyle final - amazing.

The Australian women have been doing really well in the pool. Nice to see. [Smile]

But I've been enjoying some of the other events - I saw the mens 10m synchronised diving final yesterday. One of the British team is 14! And pretty good. The Chinese team (who won) were pretty incredible - to stay so in synch as you are falling 10m into water. (Mind you, I can't even jump elegantly off a 10m board). I found the 17 year old Chinese guy who won the 56kg weightlifting interesting.
 
Posted by Liz B (Member # 8238) on :
 
Very exciting team competition for men's gymnastics just ended. I thought the coverage was pretty good, but I would've liked to have seen routines from a few other teams (NBC showed China, Japan, and US almost exclusively). There was a long enough wait for scores that they could've easily flipped to say, the vaults, without missing any of what they wanted to cover.

I admit that I haven't read the first 2 pages of this thread, so forgive me if I repeat: I just want to complain briefly about the commentators. I'm sure it's very difficult to comment live. But in the 2 years between Olympics I always forget how ANNOYING they are. They latch onto a theme (last night: the fact that the US was putting up 4 routines instead of 5, so EVERY SCORE COUNTS!!!!!!!!) and repeat it and repeat it and repeat it and repeat it...

Maybe that's what sports commentary is like? If so, I can imagine that someone who knew enough about a sport would just mute it.
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
The men did well to capture the bronze, considering the hardship they've overcome. The pommel routines were disappointing, and I swear I would have put up Horton for no reason other than the man was HOT tonight and on a roll. But how interesting that Sasha Artemev didn't make the team because they didn't think they could rely on him - and he's the ONLY one who came through in the clutch on pommel.

I was happy for him, but honestly a bit disgusted with the performances of Tan and Bhavsar on pommel. Our men's program really needs to do a better job on that event, it's perennially our weakest and Sasaha showed that good routines ARE possible.

However, it was still a good showing. Now, I hope Horton gets a chance in the all-around finals.

On to the women's competition!
 
Posted by Shanna (Member # 7900) on :
 
I was hoping they get the silver, despite the very slim chance, but its still INCREDIBLE that they medaled! I remember being so stunned when I heard both of the Hamm brothers were going to be out of the competition. The alternates must have been so excited and so nervous. But they pulled it out. Some less than stellar performances, but I'm still so proud of them!

And Horton! Wow! He could do no wrong tonight. I hope we'll see more of him this Olympics.

On a random note, I love that the men don't even bother to pretend to dance during their floor routine. They just go out there and throw themselves through the air. I wish the female routines were as straight forward.
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
Yeah, that Sasha wossname was fabulous on the pommel. And I forget the name, but there was that one tall-ish blond guy who did the high bar and just went insane. Fantastic fun.

I also feel the need to reiterate - Michael Phelps is a beast. If it weren't for the Morgan Freeman Visa commercials, I would have said Phelps was part dolphin; fortunately, I now know better. [Smile]
 
Posted by ketchupqueen (Member # 6877) on :
 
quote:
They latch onto a theme (last night: the fact that the US was putting up 4 routines instead of 5, so EVERY SCORE COUNTS!!!!!!!!) and repeat it and repeat it and repeat it and repeat it...

I've always thought this was aimed at people, like me, who tend to be in and out just catching a bit here and there.
 
Posted by ketchupqueen (Member # 6877) on :
 
quote:
On a random note, I love that the men don't even bother to pretend to dance during their floor routine. They just go out there and throw themselves through the air.
Indeed. Though I like the dancy moves from the women when they're well done. [Smile]
 
Posted by Starsnuffer (Member # 8116) on :
 
Yeah I feel like the women are clearly not synchronized for most of the time and therefore the music is sort of an annoying distraction from the real event, the person dancing or gymnasticking around.

Yeah, the second pommel routine was just embarrassing for America. Artemev did really well though. I don't know what's really judged in pommel, but I like his routine best of anybody, there's lots of flashy-looking leg flailing up high. eh, it impresses me. I think the most impressive thing of the night was: Chinese parallel bars, and American high bar, specifically the triple flip, and the triple twist dismounts from two of them. They are just so impressive.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
I couldn't believe how they fell apart on the pommel, and the scores the first two got. But wow Artemev was awesome! I couldn't believe some of the twists and turns he did on that routine.

Horton was just on FIRE in every single event. He was getting crazy air and sticking landings like velcro.

I think he and Justin Spring were just totally robbed on the high bar. They were doing AMAZING stuff, just amazing. And while they were getting low 15s, the Chinese were getting high 16s over on the vault, and then 16s on the high bar themselves. That didn't seem right to me. Spring and Horton had stunning high bar routines and they both nailed them with almost mechanical precision.

I'm really proud of them. Does anyone know which of the Americans qualified for which events in the individual gymnastics portion? I thought every event had a competition to see who is best, and then that there is an all around title (that Horton I know is competing for).
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Nevermind, I found it. Only two atheletes from each country may compete regardless of scores. The top eight finishers get to compete for their aparatus, except for the Individual All Around which I think uses the top 24 finishers.

Jonathon Horton and Alexander Artemev have qualified for the Individial All Around title. They'll compete against 22 others. No American men qualified for the Floor, Valut, Parallel Bars or Rings.

Alexander Artemev will compete for the Pommel Horse against seven others, and Jonathon Horton will compete in the Horizontal Bar against seven others.

Horton came in sixth in the Qualifiers in Horizontal Bar, and Justin Spring and Joey Haggerty just barely missed qualifying by a couple tenths of a point. No other American even came close in Pommel.

On the women's side:

Shawn Johnson and Nastia Liukin finished first and second in Individual All Around, the only event the Chinese women didn't finish first. The two of them finished third and fourth on the Floor Exercise.

Alicia Sacramore finished third on Vault. Nastia Liukin and Shawn Johnson finished second and third on Balance Beam, and Nastia Liukin finished fifth on Uneven Bars. Even though she finished fifth, Liukin is a gold medal favorite on the Bars, though China considers the event their specialty and will compete heavily for placement on the podium.

The women could have done a lot better in qualifying for the individual events, but they took a lot of spills during the quals that knocked a few of them out, like Memmel on the Uneven Bars and Sacramore on the Floor.

Should be a great competition!

[ August 12, 2008, 05:01 AM: Message edited by: Lyrhawn ]
 
Posted by ketchupqueen (Member # 6877) on :
 
I was yelling at my husband when Horton was doing the floor routine, "You've got to see this! You've got to see this! Look at him stick these landings!!!"
 
Posted by brojack17 (Member # 9189) on :
 
The way mens gymnastics team after they won bronze was horrible. Hamming it up for the cammera saying "What, what!" and "That's how we roll". I really hate middle to upperclass white kids acting like gangsters. Well, I hate anyone acting like gangsters.
 
Posted by BannaOj (Member # 3206) on :
 
I thought it was pretty funny. Horton is so stereotypically Texan that I was dying of laughter, particularly the "swimmin' in the river" comment along with the "glory to God part". He could have been a UT football player. It was amusing to watch the rest of the team eyeroll on that bit. I wonder in particular what Rav thought.
 
Posted by Omega M. (Member # 7924) on :
 
Uh-oh; it appears that one of the Chinese girls in the opening ceremony was lip-synching her song.

I don't think this matters much; people lip-synch all the time, and it's just a little embarrassing when they're caught.
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
The lip-synching doesn't bother if the same girl were singing the song. In other words, if it were her singing, just pre-recorded I wouldn't have a problem with it. But, to use on girls' voice and substitute another one just because she's prettier does bug me.

And the faked fireworks? That does take away some of my admiration for that opening ceremony. I mean, anybody can put together an amazing show with special effects and the ability to pre-record and edit footage. What makes the opening ceremonies so impressive is that they're live.

So yeah, color me disappointed.
 
Posted by Puffy Treat (Member # 7210) on :
 
I feel sympathy for the poor, talented girl deemed not "perfect" enough to appear on camera.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Damn! I wish I had wrote it down, but I suspected while watching that fireworks sequence that it was CGI. The city looked washed out, the shot too smooth, and the fireworks too precisely in the shot. I actually said that but the people I was with disagreed [Frown]

I'm not too upset since I did really suspect it though.

The lip sync thing is just plain obnoxious. I wonder if Zhang Yimou had anything to do with it (what, you don't think that Gong Li's breasts normally look like that, do you?).
 
Posted by amira tharani (Member # 182) on :
 
I think it's time to add a British voice in here - was anyone else watching Gail Emms and Nathan Robertson put out the Chinese 2nd seeds in the badminton today? They looked down and out after the second game in which they blew an 11-7 lead to lose 21-16, and then the Chinese had an 11-6 lead in the third (at which point I switched channels, thinking it was all over). When I switched back the score was 19-18 to the Brits - they scored 5 straight points from 17-12 down, and eventually won 21-19! Amazing result!

I didn't get to see the gymnastics final - I'll have to go and hunt for that on bbc iplayer later. - it sounds pretty impressive and the womens final sounds like it might be just as good.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
The lip sync thing is just plain obnoxious. I wonder if Zhang Yimou had anything to do with it (what, you don't think that Gong Li's breasts normally look like that, do you?).
They don't?! Wait, how could you possibly know this Mucus?

I had a huge crush on her a few years ago, so you better have some solid evidence.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
I was referring to the controversy surrounding Zhang Yimou's Curse of the Golden Corset thing.

If you still retain your crush, I think its perfectly safe. Gong Li is attractive either way.

Personally, I wouldn't have picked Zhang to do the ceremonies, I would have picked Stephen Chow of Shaolin Soccer fame. At least soccer is an Olympic sport. But mainlanders do seem to like picking Zhang to do these kinds of productions.
 
Posted by Redskullvw (Member # 1549) on :
 
I thought Spitz was good. Phelps is simply without a peer or equal.
 
Posted by James Tiberius Kirk (Member # 2832) on :
 
code:
while (olympics) {
phelps.MedalCount++;
}

--j_k
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
How about those girls. It's not always about winning.I can't even imagine the pressure on those young shoulders. They can hold their heads up high.

[ August 13, 2008, 12:50 AM: Message edited by: Irami Osei-Frimpong ]
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
code:
while (olympics) {
phelps.MedalCount++;
}

Fail.

code:
bool OrderedList::Insert( /* in */ int key, /* in  */ Info  info )
{
Item temp;

if ( IsFull() || Search( key, info ) )
{
return false;
}

items[size].key = key;
items[size].info = info;
size++;

for ( int count = 0; count < (size-1); count++ )
{
temp = items[count];
counter = count;
while (( int counter > 0 ) && ( items[counter-1].key > temp.key ))
{
items[counter] = items[counter-1];
counter = counter - 1;
}

items[counter] = temp;
}
return true;

}

Ordered lists ftw.
 
Posted by Elmer's Glue (Member # 9313) on :
 
Is that supposed to look like tiny gibberish?

That one girl must feel terrible. It was entirely her fault that our women's gymnastics team lost the gold.
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
It's not as if she doesn't know it, Elmer's.

Alicia Sacramone is a veteran, she's 20 (I know, ridiculous, but in gymnastics that makes her the oldest and most experienced). She knows she messed up. It will haunt her forever and I feel awful for her.

I'm still proud of them. I know it's not the result they wanted, but doggone it, it's hard to compete against a machine like Chinese gymnastics.

I was stunned when Tim Daggett said they start elite training at 3. That's ridiculous. In the US, you can't start that type of competing until you're 10. We have USA Gymnastics, which oversees all sanctioned gymnastics in the country and mandates when girls can begin certain types of competition. The reason is to reduce injury and risk and have the safest and fairest competition possible.

For every Chinese gold medalist, how many had catastrophic injury because they were pushed too far and too young? The idea of training that intensely that young sickens me. Did you hear the story about the girl who wanted to quit gymnastics and come home, and her parents refused to allow it? Or that it's common for gymnasts to only see their parents once a year?

Winning the gold was going to be tough anyway because we started out 2 points behind due to difficulty. Part of that was losing Chellsie Memmel to injury - she had a higher rated beam routine than Alicia and would have competed on beam. Part of that was also losing Sam Peszek on bars, where she likely would have competed in place of Shawn Johnson who is not a really strong bars worker. But, the fact is we were behind before we stepped on the mat because China's girls were throwing ridiculous skills because they've been trained much harder from a much younger age.

Given all that, we should be proud of the silver. And if the silver is the price we pay for the fact that our gymnasts are 1) the proper age and 2) actually know who their parents are, I'll take the silver proudly.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Chinese parents drive kids hard, news at 11 [Wink]

But seriously, with 1.3 billion people, everything is very competitive in China.
People with use any edge they can to get ahead and the one-child policy can often exacerbate the problem. In North America, the difference between gold and silver might mean the difference between 100K advertising contracts and a 20K advertising contract. In China, the disparity would probably be even greater with the latter ending in poverty and obscurity.

Combine that with no safety, no anti-discrimination laws, and you can get pretty tragic and awful things going on.

I don't think that will really quickly change until China becomes much more prosperous, the population curve starts to edge down, and people can afford the luxury of losing.
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
quote:
Given all that, we should be proud of the silver. And if the silver is the price we pay for the fact that our gymnasts are 1) the proper age and 2) actually know who their parents are, I'll take the silver proudly.
I agree. I also think that Sacramone is a good gymnast with a lot of heart.
 
Posted by katharina (Member # 827) on :
 
The picture of them getting the medals made me so sad. The other five girls were beaming, but she looked still upset and like she wanted to kick something, possibly herself.
 
Posted by theresa51282 (Member # 8037) on :
 
I thought the NBC interview with Alicia was just downright cruel. I had a hardtime even watching. Clearly, she felt terrible and blamed herself. How many times are you going to make her say that she felt awful. I am glad her teammates were so supportive. I am really proud of them. I think Shawn and Nastia will do well in the all around.

I have to say I am disappointed in Bela Karolyi. I have always had a soft spot for him and think his exuberance is contagious but he just seemed bitter last night talking about the age of the Chinese gymnasts. I found it especially hard to take because he has long ago admitted that most of his Romanian team had there ages altered in order to compete. I'd like to see the age rule lowered or lifted entirely. It is not enforceable except on a national level and when nations don't want to comply they simply don't. Even beyond that, if they don't compete but still are practicing all the skills and doing them domestically the risks are still very high.

I am looking forward to the men's all around tonight. I hope Horton has a great night. He was so fun to watch in the team competition. I love when athletes are simply excited to do there best. I don't think he'll medal but if he does his best that would be great!
 
Posted by MrSquicky (Member # 1802) on :
 
quote:
People with use any edge they can to get ahead and the one-child policy can often exacerbate the problem.
I was under the impression that this was the Chinese government's official policy, but the way you're presenting it makes it seem otherwise. Is that correct?
 
Posted by BannaOj (Member # 3206) on :
 
I think Karolyi is bitter, because since he did coach under the same circumstances, he knows *exactly* the psychological advantage the younger kids have. They don't have the same fear of failure that the would otherwise. They simply haven't lived long enough. So the bitterness comes because the playing field isn't level. I don't know if it is possible to know what he thinks, about whether it is truly "ok" to compete girls that young or not. If he honestly thinks the damage that they might have to deal with for the rest of their life is worth the performance or not. He's seen the consequences both ways, but I doubt we will ever know what his "real" opinion is.
 
Posted by katharina (Member # 827) on :
 
When the 16-and-over rule start? I seem to remember an American gymnast who was only 14.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
MrSquicky: I'm not entirely sure what you mean by "this." If you're referring to the policy of aggressively taking children to train at very young ages, then I think its a complex combination of government policy, culture, and economics.

For example, as Belle hinted I would not be surprised if the parents were totally in support of sending away their kids for intensive training, starting as early as possible, or staying away to not be a distraction.

Its a part of a cultural attitude that still persists to a great degree in the Asian Canadian community. Honestly, it has both good and bad aspects, its all a matter of perspective.
 
Posted by MrSquicky (Member # 1802) on :
 
Mucus,
That was what I'm talking about. As for it being a complex mix, no doubt, but it is, if I got it right, something that the government is going to do even if the parents don't agree.

Though many of the parents may agree with this, I doubt that this is uniform (especially among the ones that get back a 6 year old crippled from the intense training) and those who do not agree don't really have any recourse.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
What I'm commenting on is a series of historical and cultural precedents for this kind of brutal and punishing training. As one example, training for the imperial examinations in China was extremely high pressure. You would start at a very very early age and a whole family, even a village would have to pitch in and support them. There were no consolation prizes, either you pass and become a bureaucrat with all the money, power, and respect that entails in those days or you come home with nothing disappointing your whole family. This system probably lasted for more than a thousand years. In fact, it was a failed student that turned to Christianity and started the Taiping Rebellion, thats how brutal and twisted the pressures could be in that kind of environment.
Even today in certain well-to-do cities China, if you place well on citywide examinations in normal school, you get the privilege of being sent to an elite city school where you intensively study and board away from your parents. I think turning it down is completely unheard of.

This is only part of the cultural background that informs athletic training. These days, it is not as though the Chinese government can go around DNA testing to find potential athletes and then kidnap them away for training. Rather parents probably scrape and save money in order to put their kids in training just for the chance of being spotted and getting a chance to get ahead. When the government spots their kids, it must feel like a dream come true. With incomes like they have in China, probably few families can afford to send their kids to training for "fun". As I said before, thats a *luxury* that we have in the Western world.

Honestly, I'm no expert on gymnastics, I am hesitant to speculate more, and if you have access to an online article about the Chinese system I would be happy to review it. But I'm just saying that while the government can be blamed for many things, there are many other factors that feed into this particular system.

Edit to add:
Two examples
quote:

Each year a team of coaches selects 150 snotty-nosed four-year-olds from all the nursery schools in the city of Shanghai. Chen does not usually pick the child who jumps the highest or is the fastest runner in the school playground. He prefers to ask parents: "Is your son a little devil?" before they hurry to point out how well behaved their little child is, unwittingly ruining his chances of being picked. "What we are looking for are disobedient children because those are the ones with the extra energy to offer," says the coach. "A bit more sacrifice to contribute."
...
A first group of pre-selected children must put up with an hour and a half of gruelling testing in order to ascertain whether they are sufficiently resistant to pain despite their tender years. Their parents are, according to Chen, often unable to stand seeing their children suffer, and rush off home with them. "Those who stay behind have the chance of being champions," says the chief coach.

link
quote:

Cheng's road to Beijing began in central China, here in Hubei Province, a bleak industrial region where her father worked as a shipping clerk and her mother toiled in a tire factory.

She was born in 1988, an only child in a nation with a one-child policy. From the beginning, her parents say, she looked like a boy, so they treated her like one. Her father, a disciplinarian who had studied martial arts, pushed her from an early age, even pressing her to do calisthenics every morning before primary school classes began.

"I trained her like a military soldier," said her father, Cheng Ligao, who now owns a shop in Huangshi. "She followed me step by step and I shouted to her, 'One-two, one-two...."'
...
At one point, Cheng pleaded with her parents to let her quit and return home. "We asked her to hold on because we had invested so much and lived so bitterly," her mother said.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/08/05/sports/gymnast.php?page=2

[ August 13, 2008, 01:49 PM: Message edited by: Mucus ]
 
Posted by MrSquicky (Member # 1802) on :
 
Here's an article I found that largely backs up what you are saying. Honestly, it's not something I know that much about. I'm going from impressions here. I had thought that thre were local sports officials whose job it was to screen young school students for athletic potential, who are then given little choice but to join the athletic program in whatever sport the government decides and then trained untill they are dismissed, are gravely injured or die, or become sucessful olympic athletes. The article I found implies that there is more choice involved than had expected.

I was expecting that, by and large, the athletes and their families would go along with the cultural and economic push towards this. I know enough about Chinese psychology to know that they are very different in this respect than Westerners. But, and I can't recall where I picked this up, I was under the impression that there were known cases where a promising child was basically kidnapped from their unwilling parents in order to be trained as an olympic contender.
 
Posted by lobo (Member # 1761) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Elmer's Glue:
Is that supposed to look like tiny gibberish?

That one girl must feel terrible. It was entirely her fault that our women's gymnastics team lost the gold.

It is NOT her fault. Even if she would have nailed her routines and got the highest score on our team, we still wouldn't have won. The chinese won by 2.375 points. She was 1.075 points lower than the highest beam girl and 1.075 points behind the highest floor girl (on our team). That adds up to 2.15; we still would have lost by .225 points. Pretty sad to see all the piling on...
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by katharina:
When the 16-and-over rule start? I seem to remember an American gymnast who was only 14.

From what I understand about this, the rule is that one must turn 16 at any point during the Olympic year, so there are a few 15-year-olds competing. I'm pretty sure this rule came into effect within the past year and a half - but don't quote me on this. I'm just trying to synthesize all the reports I've heard/read about it.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
In fact, it was a failed student that turned to Christianity and started the Taiping Rebellion, thats how brutal and twisted the pressures could be in that kind of environment.
Mao also failed the exams and that was a big part of why he started down the path he did. In fact I remember reading several times that Hong Xiu Quan was a hero of Mao.

And now for alittle self aggrandizing, I edited some things in Hong Xiu Quan's wikipedia article. Specifically I added a citation to the statement that Hong had a demon slaying sword crafted for him and his friend.

edit: I read some things similar to what Mr Squicky was mentioning regarding conscripted athletes. It was in Time magazine a few weeks ago I believe, if not it was in Newsweek. The harsh mode of training certainly can't be blamed squarely on the government as that tradition is hundreds if not thousands of years old. If you watch Farewell My Concubine there is a very long sequence of scenes detailing what children endured to "perhaps" become opera/ballet stars. It's very hard to watch but I honestly believe that it was very common.

I've mentioned this before but on the news in Hong Kong they once took their cameras to a ballet school in mainland China and filmed the training methods and it was extremely abusive, both physically and especially emotionally. Although the end result overall is depressing you cannot deny the prowess of many of their star dancers.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Sounds about right.

I took a look for articles via Google News for articles in Time and Newsweek. No real luck finding anything too similar, if either of you come across it again, I'd be curious.

There was an interesting profile on a gymnast that was disabled in Time though
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/08/12/sports/OLYDISABLED.php
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
I'm actually not sure if Mao failed said exams, recall that his youth carried him through the turbulent times of the Xinhua revolution and the warlord era "his path" wasn't one of some clerical fanatic, it was a military-politico career similar to Caesar, grabbing one opportunity after another and interestingly enough almost always when others isolate him.

What I mean there is that several times Mao loses "power" or "authority" in some sense just after a success and almost always things start going badly and so they go back and ask for his help again using each opportunity to gain more and more authority.


quote:

The eldest child of a relatively prosperous peasant family, Mao Zedong was born on December 26, 1893, in a village called Shaoshan in Xiangtan County (湘潭縣), Hunan province. His ancestors migrated from Jiangxi province during the Ming Dynasty, and had settled there as farmers. His father was Mao Jen-sheng, a peasant farmer. Wen Chi-mei, his mother, was a very devout Buddhist. Due to his family's relative wealth, his father was able to send him to school and later to Changsha for more advanced schooling.

During the 1911 Revolution, Mao enlisted as a soldier in a local regiment in Hunan which fought on the side of the revolutionaries. Once the Qing Dynasty had been effectively toppled, Mao left the army and returned to school.[7]

After graduating from the First Provincial Normal School of Hunan in 1918, Mao traveled with Professor Yang Changji, his high school teacher and future father-in-law, to Beijing during the May Fourth Movement in 1919.

Professor Yang held a faculty position at Peking University. Because of Yang's recommendation, Mao worked as an assistant librarian at the University with Li Dazhao as curator. Mao registered as a part-time student at Beijing University and attended many lectures and seminars by famous intellectuals, such as Chen Duxiu, Hu Shi, Qian Xuantong, etc. During his stay in Beijing, he read as much as possible, and through his readings, he was introduced to Communist theories. He married Yang Kaihui, Professor Yang's daughter who was his fellow student, despite an existing marriage arranged by his father at home. Mao never acknowledged this marriage. In October 1930, the Guomindang (GMD) captured Yang Kaihui with her son, Anying. The GMD imprisoned them both and Anying, then, was later sent to his relatives after the GMD killed his mother, Yang Kaihui. At this time , Mao was living with a co-worker, He Zizhen, a 17 year old girl from Yongxing, Jiangxi.[8] Mao turned down an opportunity to study in France because he firmly believed that China's problems could be studied and resolved only within China. Unlike his contemporaries, Mao concentrated on studying the peasant majority of China's population.

On July 23, 1921, Mao, age 27, attended the first session of the National Congress of the Communist Party of China in Shanghai. Two years later, he was elected as one of the five commissars of the Central Committee of the Party during the third Congress session.

Alot of text, but it doesn't appear to be any reference to poor grades as a motivator for "turning to the darkside". If anything from the books I've read he was considered the family scholar-to-be.
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
For 2010, the Chinese curling team will have a huge advantage, they're so far one of the few teams allowed to be and training in Vancouver right now.
 
Posted by TheBlueShadow (Member # 9718) on :
 
For the gymnasts/parent's of I have a question.

Why are there only four events for women's gymnastics but six for men? I get that the differences between men and women lead to different events but why not have more events for the women?

quote:
Given all that, we should be proud of the silver. And if the silver is the price we pay for the fact that our gymnasts are 1) the proper age and 2) actually know who their parents are, I'll take the silver proudly.
I'd also like to agree with this.

The Australians did fantastic in the Women's 4x200m Freestyle Relay, and I was shocked China and the US were able to close that gap as much as they did.

I've had fun watching swimming this year. Phelps' medal run has been fantastic. I hope he can keep up the endurance. Though the NBC commentators are a little too obsessed with him, we didn't even get to hear any of the interview with the other members of the US 4x200 men's team. I love watching him swim but way to pick favorites NBC.
 
Posted by Elmer's Glue (Member # 9313) on :
 
I'm guessing it is because there just aren't any other good events for them to compete in. What would you suggest they add, Ribbon Twirling?
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Tomorrow night should be good. Phelps is swimming for his next gold, and Shawn Johnson and Nastia Liukin will be competing in the women's individual all around. I believe Johnson is the reigning world champion in the all around, and Liukin is also a medal favorite.

My brother's future brother in law races in the semifinals for Men's 4 Man Sculling (rowing) in about an hour and a half.

Track and Field starts soon!
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Elmer's Glue:
I'm guessing it is because there just aren't any other good events for them to compete in. What would you suggest they add, Ribbon Twirling?

That's already an event, but for rhythmic, rather than artistic gymnastics.
 
Posted by Elmer's Glue (Member # 9313) on :
 
That's lame. What will they add next? Ping pong? BB guns?
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
Already have them......


Just in case you didn't know.

[Wink]
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Trampolining is a sport too. Personally I don't agree with some of the things that are medal competitions. Most of the things for the Winter Games I'm okay with. There's a lot in the Summer Games that I could easily be happy with being gone.

But whatever, I guess if there are really that many people who want to learn and excel at whatever sport we're making up next, then more power to them. I think I draw the line at Olympic Quidditch though.
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
quote:
For the gymnasts/parent's of I have a question.

Why are there only four events for women's gymnastics but six for men? I get that the differences between men and women lead to different events but why not have more events for the women?

quote:
I'm guessing it is because there just aren't any other good events for them to compete in.
I'm guessing it's because all the events are designed to measure strength, flexibility, power, balance, and control of the body and the four events do that quite nicely already for the women. There's no real need to add anything else.

Some things I've learned about gymnastics over the years my daughter has been training and competing have really surprised. One - beam is usually the easiest event to train. I know it doesn't seem that way, but you have to realize you rarely do anything on the beam that you don't already know how to do on the floor. There's no real new skill to learn, you just have to learn how to land it on the beam.

I'm not trying to say beam is easy - it's obviously not and it does carry the most risk, because even something you've landed ten thousand times correctly in the gym can go wrong (ask Alicia Sacramone) but my point is that learning something new on the beam goes pretty quickly compared to other events because you already know how to do the skill. Not to mention that when new skills are learned on the floor, coaches are already looking forward to the beam and so the skill is taught with an eye for getting the gymnast to land it in a perfectly straight line on the floor.

Second thing I've learned - bars is hard. Wicked hard. It's the event that causes most girls in our gym to quit. They leave the gym because they can't advance to the next level and the reason they can't advance is bars.
They'll have every other skill they need in every other event but not bars. It's not as if we have a bad bars coach either - he's renowned for his bars coaching and has coached numerous state champions in that event. It's just very hard. It takes a perfect combination of upper body strength, abdominal strength, flexibility, balance and a timing. Those are hard to get all working together at the right time.

Some people are born bar workers. My daughter is one - she just has an instinct for the timing and is a very good "swinger" - she maintains her straight body lines in the air. Now, the tradeoff is that she is NOT a very good dancer or tumbler so her floor exercise scores tend to be pretty low. The all-around gymnast like Shawn Johnson and Nastia Luikin who can be exceptional in every event is so rare. (not that I'm even thinking of comparing my daughter to one of those two - trust me, she is not in the same stratosphere!) Bars always looks so effortless when people like Shawn Johnson and Nastia Luikin do it, so I was shocked to find out how hard it is to learn that event and progress to the next level.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Thanks for the insider point of view Belle, that was interesting. On the women's side, I always thought vault and beam looked like the hardest, especially for the kind of stuff Shawn Johnson does. Vault looks hard to learn though, I mean, I can't imagine how a girl or guy feels the first time they have to just go for it and flies through the air. It also seems like there is a high risk of injury from botched attempts.

I'm curious as to how guys and girls could do each other's events. I don't think women could really do the rings. That's just raw upper body strength. I think in that respect, it's one of thsoe events that complements the gender that has to do it, as upper body strength is more respected and prized in men than women.

I might be curious to see women do the pommel horse and men do the beam. That'd be interesting.
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
I don't want to see men on the beam.
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
quote:
Vault looks hard to learn though, I mean, I can't imagine how a girl or guy feels the first time they have to just go for it and flies through the air. It also seems like there is a high risk of injury from botched attempts.

Yeah, there is a certain amount of fear to overcome the first time you run headlong down a runway at top speed and hurl yourself at a stationary object!

What surprised me about vault is how technical it all is. I mean, it looks like you just run and hit the springboard (at this point I'm not talking about the vaults where they do a round off and go on the table backward). I had no idea there were marks on the vault runway for each gymnast - a "number" based on a tape measure that is beside the runway. Gymnasts always start in the exact same place - they run the exact same number of steps so they can hit the springboard on the same step and with the correct foot extended.

My daughter's coach changed her lead foot and she was unable to vault for a long while - she'd run down the runway, then stop because it felt wrong -she couldn't get her head around leading with the other foot. She finally got it though. [Smile]

The good news is the new vault table is much safer than the old horse they used to use. Injuries in vault have gone way down. This table is shaped so that collisions aren't nearly as catastrophic as they were before.

Still, it's a difficult event to be sure. Much more precision involved than I imagined. Of course, my daughter is nowhere near the level that does the round-off back handspring vaults - that one is far more technical than the front handspring ones she does now.

They train vault very gradually, they start off just vaulting on to stacks of mats, and only later move up to using the table. When they do, their coach is always right there to stop them if they are headed into the table wrong, and able to spot them in the handspring over the top of the vault. They often land in "the pit" a sunken area of floor filled with really soft, squishy mats. They don't move them to the harder mats until they've got it down pat.
 
Posted by brojack17 (Member # 9189) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Belle:
quote:
Vault looks hard to learn though, I mean, I can't imagine how a girl or guy feels the first time they have to just go for it and flies through the air. It also seems like there is a high risk of injury from botched attempts.

Yeah, there is a certain amount of fear to overcome the first time you run headlong down a runway at top speed and hurl yourself at a stationary object!
I always think of this when I see them vault. (Work Safe)
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
I love all this controversy with all of these Chinese gymnasts who are all obviously 16 years old (why would you ever suspect otherwise) and absolutely no younger than that, definitely not 13.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Samprimary:
I love all this controversy with all of these Chinese gymnasts who are all obviously 16 years old (why would you ever suspect otherwise) and absolutely no younger than that, definitely not 13.

Either my sarcasmometer is giving me a false positive, or my sincerigauge is simply not functioning properly.

I assume you are being sarcastic, I too seriously doubt those girls are 16 even if we take into account that Chinese calculate years with newborns being 1 year of age.

There were many instances in Hong Kong where rival Chinese schools did the opposite, saying high schoolers were in junior high, and 20+ year olds were in high school.
 
Posted by James Tiberius Kirk (Member # 2832) on :
 
Gold/silver. Cool. (:

--j_k
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
I'm very pleased with the outcome. I wanted them to go 1 and 2, and didn't care which way it went.

Shawn Johnson is an amazing gymnast, but Nastia just has the advantage in the artistic portion of the event called artistic gymnastics.

Both of their beam scores were undervalued, if you ask me, but both put up amazing performances on floor ex.

Good for them - they both worked hard to get there and deserve it. [Smile]
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
I was definitely rooting for Shawn Johnson, because I like her style more - big, powerful tumbling is more exciting to me. I thought her beam was a bit underscored, especially compared to the Chinese girl who went after her... but it's important to note here that I have no idea what goes on in judging the routines, except that wobbling and/or falling off are bad. [Smile]

Either way, I'm glad the Americans went 1/2.

(And here, I need to register my disappointment in all the gold-medal winners I saw today who either don't know the words to the [US] national anthem or appear to consider themselves above singing it out loud. Maybe they're singing it in their heads or something. Or maybe it's just not a big deal anymore to someone like Michael Phelps. Either way, I like the people who sing along better.)
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
Carrie, I made almost the same comment about singing to my wife earlier today during the presentation for swimming.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
It looked like Nastia was trying, but I think she was going back and forth from trying not to cry and trying to sing the anthem.

I was a bit surprised Soni didn't sing it. You'd think that someone who was such a total come from behind victory that was never supposed to be there or be a contender for a medal would have felt the need to make the most of it, but maybe the enormity of the situation just totally stunned her. I think it's impossible to imagine how they feel up there.

But all in all, I too would like to see them sing.
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
Soni did look stunned, and she did sing the very last bit of it...but I still thought it was weird that she wasn't singing.


I wanted to shoot the judges though....talk about inconsistent judging. It was almost like they were trying to keep it close or something. Not quite as bad as ice skating judging usually is...at least they got the right winners.

[Wink]
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Seriously. Even someone who just tuned in for the first time would have been able to see how off the judging was, especially on the beam.

In other news: The US 4 Man Sculling team (with my brother's fiancee's brother on it) just advanced to the medal race which will happen on Sunday morning. They'll be facing Germany, Italy, France, Poland, and a fifth team I can't remember. Poland has been dominant in this race for a long time, but the US showed themselves a surprise contender when they upset Poland earlier this year at the World's. The US finished behind Italy but ahead of France in the semis, and it should be a crazy strong race on Sunday.

Track and Field is officially under way as well!
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
If you look closely at her beam routine (Shawn's) you can see deductions. The standing full is a crazy skill, but she finished it with her chest down - that can be up to 3 tenths. Also, on the ridiculous tumbling pass at the beginning - there are slight leg separations in the back handsprings and they can take a tenth on each one - which means they can take two tenths there.
Her extensions in her split leaps might be a fuzz under 180 or just at 180, where as Nastia is usually over 180.

I mean, it's all little stuff, but little stuff adds up.

I'm not saying it wasn't still undervalued, just that those "style" points that Shawn misses because she's more of a power gymnast than an artistic one can nickel and dime her to death.

Shawn scores really high in the US because we love crazy skills and big risks and power tumbling. To bring in the men - Justin Spring scores well inside the country for the same reasons. Internationally, the judges like clean lines and flexibility and good extension more than power. That's why both Justin and Shawn will tend to score lower on the International gymnastics stage and gymnasts like Nastia and Sasha Artemev will score higher.

Still, Shawn could have beaten Nastia had she stuck everything and performed a more difficult bar routine. Starting out a full point behind Nastia on bars was just too much to make up. Her big advantage - vault - she didn't capitalize on because of the big crossover step on the landing.
 
Posted by MrSquicky (Member # 1802) on :
 
I was wondering, do the people behind the Olympics in China think that getting caught faking and cheating things makes them look bad? The Mili Vanili and CGI fireworks, the obviously underage gymnasts, the paid "yellow shirts", do they think that getting caught doing these things detracts from the perfection they are striving for? Or is that just a U.S. perspective?

I don't any illusion that these things are beyond the U.S. (the gymnast thing, maybe), but we'd feel embarassed about it. I honestly don't know how the Chinese (or, for that matter, much of the rest of the world) sees it.
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
When we complain about it, Xinhua markets it as bitchy Americans trying to bring down Chinese pride with ludicrous assertions and hostile nitpicking.

The poppet civilians then largely fall in line behind that.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
Mr Squicky: I don't think anybody here KNOWS any of the Chinese folks behind the Olympics in China. [Wink]

I can't really composes my thoughts well enough to give a good answer. I wouldn't say the Chinese just don't care about fake appearances and cheating. I guess part of it might be that when something of immense importance comes up, the Chinese are not beyond double dealing and corner cutting if it means they can achieve it.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MrSquicky:
I honestly don't know how the Chinese (or, for that matter, much of the rest of the world) sees it.

Again, it depends on what you mean by "the Chinese." [Smile]

If you're talking to the organizers and the politiburo, then I don't think that they're embarrassed and they honestly think that the fireworks and the lp-sync are ok. After all, they didn't get "caught", they announced the two things themselves in the Beijing Times and on Beijing Public Radio, respectively. I think the getting "caught" part is more of a Western spin on what happened. They certainly wanted to downplay it, but if they wanted to hide it there are better ways than going on mass media and announcing it.

Nonetheless, if you look at a sampling of blog posts and forum posts on sites that specialise in translation like Global Voices
http://globalvoicesonline.org/2008/08/12/china-faking-the-olympic-opening-ceremony-at-what-expense/
or EastSouthWestNorth which doesn't have a dedicated section, but does have many translated posts, then netizens in China do not really react any different or less critically then here.
http://www.zonaeuropa.com/weblog.htm

Of course the state media would be silent on the issue (of a controversy).

The paid spectators to fill up the stands of less popular events, I don't think Chinese people would have a problem with that. I have no idea about how the gymnast thing is seen, but I'll post something if I see something.

_________

On another note, there was a dedicated Daily Show on some of the controversies surrounding the Olympics and China on Wednesday (I watch a day behind on the Comedy Central Website). So if you're interested, go on Hulu, Comedy Central, the Daily Show website, or so forth.
It was fairly amusing.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Samprimary:
The poppet civilians then largely fall in line behind that.

Yes, because they censored people's brains and not as commonly reported, their media [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
I'm getting a funny feeling about Phelps in this 100 fly. I know he is on a roll, and he doesn't know how to lose, but there is this guy Cavic and Ian Crocker. Now I still blame Crocker for choking on the relay four years ago. I hear talk about a sore throat or a cough, but what I saw in Athens was a relay choke. It happens. It happened to him. He knows it. I know it. I half wonder is he is going to take it out on Phelps in the 100 fly. I think Phelps is going to get beaten tonight.

My favorite race is coming up, though, in the 400 medley relay. I love our guys. I love all the guys. They are such big, awkward kids. I hope they let Hansen swim it. But most of all, I hope some big sponsor has the foresight to script an ad where an exasperated Shawn Johnson is in a classroom giving a "How to talk to the media" tutorial to our open-mouthed swimming lugs. God bless them.

Now to women's soccer. My cousin is busy giving birthing a beautiful girl so my stock is staying in the states, but how about that Heather O'Reilly. She is my favorite play-maker on the team, I think it's because she is so quick and smart with her touches. She a nice soccer build, boxy, hard to get around, it's easy to forget that she can dance with the ball with the best of them. She is also decisive in a way that augments her surprising quickness.

[ August 15, 2008, 11:47 AM: Message edited by: Irami Osei-Frimpong ]
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
I don't think Phelps will lose, although if he loses anything it should be this race. There is simply no room for error, and it isn't long enough to make up distance if you fall behind. Also, the field is really strong this year.

I swam fly in high school, although nowhere near any of these guys level of course, and the 100 is a brutal race with no room for error. It is just over too quick for corrections.

I also think the sheer number of races he has swum is starting to hit him pretty hard. He looked pretty wiped at the end of his last race. It isn't just the quick turnaround, although that doesn't help.....it is all the qualifying rounds as well.

[ August 15, 2008, 01:35 PM: Message edited by: Kwea ]
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
THE CLAM!
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong:
But most of all, I hope some big sponsor has the foresight to script an ad where an exasperated Shawn Johnson is in a classroom giving a "How to talk to the media" tutorial to our open-mouthed swimming lugs. God bless them.

Kerri Walsh could also give a couple of those sessions. Or, you know, anyone articulate.
 
Posted by Risuena (Member # 2924) on :
 
It's also entirely possible that the swimmers are articulate, they're just so surprised that someone is actually talking to them and not Phelps that they don't know what to say. Has NBC even noticed that there are other swimmers?
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
I'm sure the swimmers are bright and articulate. More importantly, they seem decent. They just weren't chosen for their poise; they were chosen because they can get from one side of the pool to the other, and back again, faster than the other guy. And I like them that way. Whereas the female gymnasts have to think about presentation and the appearance of aplomb, the swimmers have only one goal. I love watching the swimmers joke around with each other. It's endearing. I love our guys, and I hope they don't change a bit. There is something about Weber-Gale that I don't like, but he is the outlier.

Then you have guys like Joey Cheek and Gary Hall Jr. who carry that same spirit into humanitarian causes, it's really something. I think I'd like Natalie Coughlin more if I didn't get the sense that she was using this as a stepping stone to her broadcasting career. There is something affected about her, or guarded or simple, who knows.

I still stand by my ad with Shawn Johnson in a small classroom ordering Locthe to spit out his gum while saying, "Aaron Peirsol, you have four gold medals, when are you going to stop saying 'Dude.'"

Misty May & Kerri Walsh are too much. They are funny, talented, driven, folksy, bright and pretty. Class acts, the lot of them.

[ August 15, 2008, 04:55 PM: Message edited by: Irami Osei-Frimpong ]
 
Posted by Shanna (Member # 7900) on :
 
Did anyone just see that Phelps race??? One one-hundredth of a second!! I'm starting to believe that he's really a robot, a waterproof robot with some guy in the stands pushing buttons on a remote.

His mother's reaction was hysterical!
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
I do like being wrong. I will gladly clap it up for Michael Phelps.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Yeah that was pretty funny. The guy in front of her looked like he got punched in the stomach too.

That was just amazing. One one hundredth. I didn't think he could do it, I thought Cavic had it, but he came on strong at the end. Even in the last second I thought Cavic had it, and especially when Phelps too that last stroke I didn't see how he could get his hands around again but somehow he did.

Crocker missed a medal by one one-hundreth of a second. Crazy, crazy.

Did anyone see this? Bela Karyoli's reaction to the final moments of Nastia Liukin's floor routine. It's utterly hysterical. Watch Bob Costas too.
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
quote:

Did anyone see this? Bela Karyoli's reaction to the final moments of Nastia Liukin's floor routine. It's utterly hysterical. Watch Bob Costas too.

I thought Bela was endearing.
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
That was just crazy. I was shaking my head, thinking So much for eight..., and he goes and gets it.

Morgan Freeman is a liar. Michael Phelps IS part-dolphin. [Smile]
 
Posted by pooka (Member # 5003) on :
 
I'm not sure if it applies to all Chinese, but I know in the case of my father and his father, lying about your age to get an advantage is no big deal in China. It's like going over the speed limit by 7 mph. I don't know if we'll ever know exactly how old my father is, and I believe his father came up 3 or 5 years younger on his records, because he fudged it to get into a military academy.

Then there was my aunt's second husband who turned out to be 10 years older than he initially claimed. That was rather pushing it. They are no longer married for reasons which the age had bearing on.

And for the lip-synching, the Mormon Tabernacle Choir has done that (though not during the 2002 games, it was for some other venue.) People lip sync in the Macy's thanksgiving parade. It's a pretty typical strategy for pageant organizers.

I don't know what the yellow shirt deal is, and I was angered by the intial attempts to fix the women's gymnastics all-around, but it wound up okay.

I was initially skeptical of Phelps, but the sheer pace at which he's winning these medals is impressive to me. Even if he is doping, he's doing an amazing job of holding his junk.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Carrie:
That was just crazy. I was shaking my head, thinking So much for eight..., and he goes and gets it.

Morgan Freeman is a liar. Michael Phelps IS part-dolphin. [Smile]

Gah! I can't find any video of this race.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
nbcolympics.com, go to video, open up the viewer and click swimming in the drop down menu, it's the 100M Fly Finals. Should be in there.

pooka -

I think one of the main reasons why Phelps has volunteered to do the expanded volunteer dope testing program is to remove all doubt as to his ability. He's going through every step required, and several that aren't, in order to prove that it's him and him alone doing this, and I believe him.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Anyone catch this?

Swedish wrestler lays his bronze on the mat and storms away from medals ceremony in protest.

They're saying he threw it down, but he set it down, if that makes any difference, I saw the video. He was mad at a bit of officiating where he says he beat the eventual gold medal winner in a semifinals match.
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
quote:
Originally posted by Samprimary:
The poppet civilians then largely fall in line behind that.

Yes, because they censored people's brains and not as commonly reported, their media [Roll Eyes]
Agitprop, when successful, is a great way to do just this.

For many chinese, the state 'pride' account supersedes critical thinking.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
I may note that you've already changed from "largely" to "many." When you're talking about Chinese people with 1.3+ billion people, practically any behaviour can be measured in "many" without being representative (e.g. There are "many" Chinese Catholics.)

I mostly question "largely" since when you downgrade your claim to "many", hell, you could say many Americans let Fox News and associated pundits supersede critical thinking.
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
The Shot
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
Great pictures, Irami! Thanks for posting.
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lyrhawn:
Anyone catch this?

Swedish wrestler lays his bronze on the mat and storms away from medals ceremony in protest.

They're saying he threw it down, but he set it down, if that makes any difference, I saw the video. He was mad at a bit of officiating where he says he beat the eventual gold medal winner in a semifinals match.

He got stripped of his medal, perhaps unsurprisingly.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
I guess it is a little unsurprising, but I disagree with the IOC that it was a political demonstration. I'm sketchier on the fair play part, because if he's right and he did get robbed, then it wasn't exactly fair play on their part was it?

But I think with something like the Olympics, you have to take the officiating in stride with the sport. I think that's true of any sport really, but with the Olympics especially I think there's more of a demand to just suck it up and take what you get, even if you feel like you deserved more. He could have lodged a formal protest afterwards.

I can understand his anger (to a degree) at what he felt he was being robbed of, but I think he could have expressed it much better.
 
Posted by Nick (Member # 4311) on :
 
I can't believe he won 8, that's crazy!
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Crazy awesome.
 
Posted by ketchupqueen (Member # 6877) on :
 
Okay, I'm a page behind, but on not singing the national anthem-- maybe they don't like it. I've never been a big fan. [Wink] Or maybe they are too overwhelmed to sing. I'd imagine in those circumstances, I would be belting my heart out-- but I'm from a loud, singing, talking family. My husband would probably be grinning ear to ear but NOT singing-- he comes from a family where emotions are kept closer inside and when overwhelmed they tend to go silent, not explode like we do in my family.
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
I may note that you've already changed from "largely" to "many." When you're talking about Chinese people with 1.3+ billion people, practically any behaviour can be measured in "many" without being representative (e.g. There are "many" Chinese Catholics.)

I mostly question "largely" since when you downgrade your claim to "many", hell, you could say many Americans let Fox News and associated pundits supersede critical thinking.

Then let's go back to 'largely' since I have no intent on 'downgrading my claim.'

What I'm talking about is something that the CCP does and that tends to work for them. We've had ample evidence since the tibet riots/torch ceremony protests.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
The Williams sisters took gold in women's tennis doubles.

Women's gymnastics saw the vault and floor this morning and men saw pommel horse and floor. I didn't read the results yet (okay, I accidentally saw floor, and the US women are at least getting two medals), I want to watch the replay later tonight. I don't know why they aren't showing it live now, I want to watch!

My brother's fiancee's brother rowed in the medal finals this morning and came in 5th place, so no medal [Frown] .

It was heartbreaking to watch the Men's 50M Rifle finals. Emmons, whose wife has won two medals for the Czech Republic, one of them gold in the Women's 50M, did almost exactly what he did four years ago. In Athens he had the Gold, all he had to do was basically hit the target, and he shot the wrong target and lost. This time around, he was up 4 points, which is a huge number in rifle shooting, but he pretty much missed the target on the last shot and ended up out of the medals by a point. That has to be gut wrenching, especially only being one shot away from his and hers matching gold medals.

Most of my favorite events are either done or winding down, but there are some track and field events that I'm looking forward to.
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
I have a hard time believing Bolt is clean, but if he is... [Eek!]

How about our girl Dara? [Big Grin] She is a delight.

I feel a little bit bad for Nastia Lukin. We like our American heroes to be hayseeds, and there just isn't an "aw shucks" bone in her body. You did a big thing well, Nastia. [Kiss] [The Wave]

Look at all these smileys, I get Olympic fever every four years. [Party]
 
Posted by Nick (Member # 4311) on :
 
I still have the image in my head when the men won the freestyle relay by .08 seconds. They really did look like the movie 300. [Smile]
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
I don't feel bad for Nastia at all, I find her so pleasant and wonderfully gracious that she is a true American hero and someone I would be proud for my daughter to look up to.

The problem with people's perceptions of Nastia is that she is so focused during competition, she never has the bright, cheery smile that Mary Lou had and Shawn has when she competes. Yet, I don't hold it against her, because some people have to be that way to channel all their energy into their competition.

Off the floor, in more relaxed situations, she's delightful.

But, people like Shawn better because she's cute, and has a big smile, and does crazy stunt gymnastics rather than elegant, controlled, beautifully artistic gymnastics. It's a shame that some people feel that way, because while I appreciate and admire both young women for their skill, poise, and genuine personalities, I think Nastia is often short-changed.
 
Posted by amira tharani (Member # 182) on :
 
I think, of the two, I like Nastia's style more - my personal preference is for the graceful and artistic, rather than the powerful. Unfortunately I haven't heard either of them do interviews, because they haven't made it to the BBC.
Talking of gymnastics... Britain won an olympic gymnastics medal for the first time in history today. Louis Smith took a bronze in the pommel horse with the same score as the man who took silver (I don't know how they differentiated between them, I assume the other guy beat him in qualifying). I don't think British gymnastics has the setup to produce a Nastia Lukin or a Shawn Johnson, but Smith is a great prospect for 2012. I'm looking forward to Beth Tweddle in the uneven bars tomorrow, but I can't see her getting a medal. I've seen too many people score 16.7ish in the team and all-around competitions and I just don't think Beth is up to that.

In general, it's been an AMAZING weekend for the Brits - we are THIRD in the medal table ahead of the Aussies!!! I don't think that's going to last but it's great for the moment.

I'm excited about the track cycling. Possibly that's because the Brits are nailing everything - two 1-2s already and a gold-bronze combo in the men's individual pursuit. But also because it's a lot of fun to watch once you get into the tactics of the races and stuff. But I bet they don't show it on NBC...
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
I saw some track cycling yesterday. It's on there, but not highly promoted.

You can see the interviews with Shawn and Nastia at the nbcolympics.com website.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Tough luck for both Alicia Sacramone and Sasha Artemev. Alicia missed a vaulting medal by a couple one hundreths of a point, and Bela Karoyli looked like he was going to cry. Frankly I think it was pretty suspect that two solid jumps with some small steps on the landing gets beaten by one good jump and one jump where the Chinese girl landed on her knees. That's strange. Clearly others agree.

So close for Sasha! He was rocking that routine until he fell off, and finished strong. I think his was the most entertaining of the routines, with that 180 spin move and his legs flying all about. It looked awesome, I just wish he could have hung on.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Samprimary:
Then let's go back to 'largely' since I have no intent on 'downgrading my claim.'

What I'm talking about is something that the CCP does and that tends to work for them. We've had ample evidence since the tibet riots/torch ceremony protests.

Then I'm interested in your methodology in assessing the influence of Xinhua and how you go about determining what people believe and why they believe it.
 
Posted by brojack17 (Member # 9189) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lyrhawn:
Tough luck for both Alicia Sacramone and Sasha Artemev. Alicia missed a vaulting medal by a couple one hundreths of a point, and Bela Karoyli looked like he was going to cry. Frankly I think it was pretty suspect that two solid jumps with some small steps on the landing gets beaten by one good jump and one jump where the Chinese girl landed on her knees. That's strange. Clearly others agree.

So close for Sasha! He was rocking that routine until he fell off, and finished strong. I think his was the most entertaining of the routines, with that 180 spin move and his legs flying all about. It looked awesome, I just wish he could have hung on.

I thought that was a joke. How can you not even land a vault and still get a medal.

Sasha looked great. If he had only been able to hold on.
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
quote:
Then I'm interested in your methodology in assessing the influence of Xinhua and how you go about determining what people believe and why they believe it.
Here's the way I understand it, compliments of several threads on other forums which were pumped full of primary sources and personal commentary from people who have been living in china for a while:

First, any discussion about what chinese people by and large 'believe' has to take into account the absolutely basic cultural difference in viewpoint related to the concept of face. It is so intrinsic to chinese politics and life that it, in part, explains china's reaction to international attention. It also explains how easily the Chinese state media can transmute even rightful criticism of the Chinese government into nationalist anger against the criticizers. The western world protesting very real human rights abuses by the Chinese government is expertly presented to the Chinese people as a slap in their face, an insult to their pride and honor.

It is true of most chinese that they genuinely believe what they are shown. This is most evident in China's uneducated and underprivileged demographics. Why shouldn't they? All sources they have agree. Most chinese young people haven't even heard of the tienanmen square massacre. It's part of an expert media totality program which, while it possesses cracks, still holds fast and effective. It is designed, in part, to keep pride wielded by the CCP as a tool for controlling the masses.

If I believe anything based on social analysis of the country's current mindset, it is this: Chinese national fervor is instilled, whole, and astonishingly powerful. A British guy I know discussed it with Chinese friends, all of whom he described as 'intelligent, rational, and sensible.' The topic du jour was the torch protests. He said that they all, to a fault, became extremely angry — extremely — when he suggested that the Chinese protesters are not being entirely rational when they protested against a "western media bias." How, he argued, can a phalanx of competing and separate commercial and non-commercial companies be collaborating in bias in terms of the Tibet issue, or the torch protests? They also became angry when they suggested that protesting against western media bias was ironic given the one-agency totalitarian media blackout prevalent within the Xinghua state news agency.

Others have similarly noted this resiliency of state-controlled bias.

What the Chinese government is doing is working.

It is no surprise what I say about what Chinese people believe, or about how pride has been expertly and efficiently manufactured into a defense against critical thinking. That's nothing uniquely Chinese, and in a perverse way I could even admire how efficient the idea of media control has worked out for the CCP so far. It keeps a lot of Chinese from having a cohesive worldview which would not be conductive to public unity under an oppressive dictatorship.

But anyway, this is more a thread about the Olympics than anything else.
 
Posted by amira tharani (Member # 182) on :
 
Belle (or anyone else), can you explain to me the judging in the bars final? I thought Liukin's routine was better than He Kexins, but scored the same, and then I thought Yang Yilin's was better still, but scored less... what am I missing? Liukin and He in particular had the same difficulty, so it was all on execution, and I really did think that Liukin's was the cleaner (and more graceful). I'm confused.

It also bites that Beth Tweddle, who is the nearest thing we've had in Britain to a good female gymnast, just missed out on the medals. I thought she'd done enough but not nailing the dismount cost her. She would have got an awesome score but for that, I think.
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
quote:

evident in China's uneducated and underprivileged demographics

China has a 92% literacy rating. Also this statement is not particularly fair, China's middle class for example is roughly over 300,000,000 which is equal to every man, woman and child in the USA.

Proportionally according to the Gini coefficient China's income/weath disparity is on par with the United States.
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
If you believe they are honest in their reporting, perhaps.

Also, the only reason they are close these days is the HUGE amount of growth in urban settings, where wealth is exploding.


What proportion of their population lives in those areas, Blayne? What percent of their population?
 
Posted by Dan_raven (Member # 3383) on :
 
What was the best Super Hero movie of this year--filled with Super Hero movies?

The one that nobody thought would be any good....

Aquaman.

starring Micheal Phelps.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by amira tharani:
Belle (or anyone else), can you explain to me the judging in the bars final? I thought Liukin's routine was better than He Kexins, but scored the same, and then I thought Yang Yilin's was better still, but scored less... what am I missing? Liukin and He in particular had the same difficulty, so it was all on execution, and I really did think that Liukin's was the cleaner (and more graceful). I'm confused.

It also bites that Beth Tweddle, who is the nearest thing we've had in Britain to a good female gymnast, just missed out on the medals. I thought she'd done enough but not nailing the dismount cost her. She would have got an awesome score but for that, I think.

Alright, I thought the scoring thus far in the Olympics has been spotty at times, and downright crappy at other times, but what happened on bars is just beyond all realms of stupid and unfair. Since Liukin and He had the exact same score, the rules say that a tiebreaker has to be used to see who gets the medal. The first tiebreaker is the start value, which they shared, the second tiebreaker is the number of deductions, which they also shared.

The third tiebreaker, get this, is taken by looking at the three lowest numbers of the four judges that count (there are six judges, and the highest and lowest numbers are tossed out). They averaged together the three lowest counting numbers for both of them, and He won.

You know, regardless of who was supposed to win and lose, that's a pretty ridiculous way of breaking a tie. I think they both should have gotten a gold, or maybe they should have done a tiebreaker and gone again, I don't know, but the way that was used was stupid. Frankly, I think Liukin should have gotten it.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Blayne Bradley:
China has a 92% literacy rating. Also this statement is not particularly fair, China's middle class for example is roughly over 300,000,000 which is equal to every man, woman and child in the USA.

The first statement is true, but the second statement, where did you get that number? That sounds incredibly high.
 
Posted by scholarette (Member # 11540) on :
 
How are you defining middle class?
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Samprimary:
It is true of most chinese that they genuinely believe what they are shown.

Again, I'm asking for specifics. How could you possibly determine this?

quote:
Most chinese young people haven't even heard of the tienanmen square massacre.
I hear this claim a lot without any substantiation or proof. After all, it is not as though one can simply go up to Chinese people, ask, and expect to get good results.

Case in point, Peter Neville-Hadley, a travel writer and normally pretty cynical critic of China debunks a famously silly experiment:
quote:

My favourite recent example of this was in the television documentary The Tank Man, shown widely in English-speaking markets in which the purpose of the documentary maker was to show that the events of Tian'an Men Square in June 1989 had been forgotten, and in particular that the authorities had been successful in suppressing all knowledge of 'the tank man'--the lone individual with his shopping bags who stood in front of a line of tanks to stop them, thus creating one of the most familiar news images of the 20th century.

In this film four hapless Bei Da (Peking University) students are handed a copy of the image and asked what it says to them. You can see this painful and embarrassing sequence here:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/tankman/view/

It's part six, whose text summary says, 'Beida University students don't recognize the photo of the tank man...'

Unfortunately for this thesis, one of the students whispers, ''89', to which another replies, 'Haoxiang shi!' ('It seems like it') while the commentary over the top nevertheless disingenuously states that she's baffled.

Out loud the students demur: 'I really don't know; I'm just guessing,' and ask whether the photo is a piece of artwork especially put together for the interviewer's 'experiment'.

It's not just that the English commentary lies about the content of the conversation, but that the whole situation is journalistically bankrupt. Of course the four students were carefully picked by the film-maker's minders, although we're led to suppose that the crew just wandered onto the campus (of Bei Da!) and sat down a few random students in front of the camera for a chat. Nothing is said about the fact that the minder is sitting somewhere behind the camera (a point later admitted by the film-maker in an interview for a different programme, apparently without the slightest embarrassment), and what Bei Da student is going to risk piping up enthusiastically with, 'Yes, yes, I know!' in front of a vast potential foreign television audience and at the cost of failing to graduate or being kicked out altogether. Their expressed bewilderment is almost pantomimic, except that it clearly seems to say, 'How could you put us on the spot like this?'

...

The commentary says that the film of the 'tank man' was only shown once on China Television, and that no one under 20 in China is likely to have seen it. Anyone who knows students at Beijing universities will know what nonsense that last part is. Or it's wild coincidence that even I know several who've seen the clip more than once on the foreign English-language channels they are allowed in their dorm rooms. A quick search of Youtube using the terms 'tank' and 'Beijing' produces four options to watch the clip on the first page of results alone. Despite blockage of Youtube in China, there is no way that this clip hasn't been downloaded many times and passed around, and it's naive in the extreme to think otherwise.

...

The actual politics here and the detailed truth of what happened in the past are beside the point. These remarks are not about politics but about the problem of getting a reliable picture of China even for trivial tourism purposes. If we can't trust the Chinese media to do anything but lie it's not clear that we can take much of our own media seriously either, not because there's a propaganda agenda in the same way (although sometimes, depending on the owner or the desire for advertising income there clearly is one of some sort or other) but simply because many of our journalists are incompetent, and others are looking to tailor information to make it fit their idea of what appeals.

http://peternh.blogspot.com/2007/08/its-going-to-be-painful-12-months-wait.html

In fact, you can go to the PBS website listed and verify for yourself that the silly experiment is indeed as described.

Most attempts I've seen at verifying this fact are fairly similar and error prone.

After all, one of the facts of living in an openly propagandistic society are that people know that they live in such a society and self-censor, especially to clueless foreigners that put them on international media.

(Sorry about the length of the quote, but I thought it was particularly apropos in describing a complex issue. If you wish to move to a different thread to discuss the issues brought up by your second paragraph, we certainly can)

[ August 18, 2008, 02:31 PM: Message edited by: Mucus ]
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
Actually the problem I have seen with the Tiananmen Square Massacre is not that Chinese people don't know about it, I would say 95%+ are fully aware of it, it's that in school they are taught that it was a violent protest designed to assault and pollute the Chinese state. Hence many Chinese people think the protestors, "Got what they deserved." Of course, from the government's perspective, the protesters were out of line. Mucus makes a good point about what Chinese people are willing to say on camera. Although this is changing subtly, there is a VERY strong sentiment of silence when it comes to talking about politics, especially to foreign journalists who can't make sure the government never sees the footage.

Whereas Tiananmen is up in the air, EVERY Chinese person knows about the Cultural Revolution where children spied on their parents, parents sold out their children, and nobody could be fully trusted.
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
I wish I could explain judging to you, but I can't.

The level my daughter competes in still uses the old 10.0 value scoring, so I have no clue how this works.

I hate it for Nastia, and I agree - if they the same score they should share the gold. It's not that big of a deal, with the new scoring it doesn't happen often, why not just allow ties?
 
Posted by scholarette (Member # 11540) on :
 
One of the ironies for Nastia is that her father tied in one of his events and they gave both athletes the gold.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
It seemed the experts and analysts all thought taht Nastia had the better routine. I can't speak to that, since I don't know gymnastics that well, but the tie breaker system is stupid. For vault it makes sense. For this it is unfair and I think Nastia feels good about silver but robbed in general, and I don't blame her.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
It is not even so much about the numbers, its about *complexity*.

I hear people saying things about "the Chinese" or what most Chinese think, not just here but in the media in general and sometimes I have to say I just don't buy it. People sometimes generalize to a startling degree and with pretty sketchy evidence.

If you claim something like "Americans do X", you may get something like "the southerners do this, the New Yorkers are like this ... well not all New Yorkers, and we also have to consider ..." There is nuance. Similarly, if we were discussing religion, there is also the implied point, "well maybe the Christians were like that in the medieval period but how about now?"

Yet somehow when the subject of China comes up, even though the combined population is greater than that of Europe, where there are still people living in a feudal society right next to people that make Donald Trump look humble, people can just say "the Chinese ..." without a trace of nuance. Layer on the fact that many people's parents have experienced events like the Cultural Revolution, grandparents the world wars, immigration back and forth between Hong Kong and mainland China. Add a dash of pretty different culture and values.

So think about what sampling error and what nuance you're missing. Balancing the vocal visa students born with silver spoons in his/her mouth and fully confident in the Chinese system are the Chinese citizens turned cynical by the Cultural Revolution and turning to underground news and rumours. Balancing the second generation Cantonese immigrants returning to Hong Kong to chase opportunities, there are immigrants coming here to avoid politics and the everyday occurrence of corruption. Balancing the rabid nationalists online amplified by a supportive censorship regime are the thousands of protests by rural peasants and those brave enough to voice their concerns about corruption in collapsed Sichuan schools.
And for each one of those, there are Chinese people with very similar upbringings and yet a different or opposite perspective. Heck, there are often even foreign expats who are often quite lively and mistaken for Chinese voices (quite prominent in the foreign media bias affair actually)

So watch the simplistic generalizations and brutal stereotypes. When someone says "Chinese people think/do X because of simple factor Y" think about what nuance would be missing if someone said the same thing about Americans and then multiply a couple times.
 
Posted by pooka (Member # 5003) on :
 
I think that when you are in another country, Americans do tend to be generalized as overly priviledged bufoons. I'm not much aware of any nuances to how French are classified in America, though whether they are admired or scorned depends on the American in question.

That was crazy about the tiebreaker. They should have turned it into a sudden death showdown! That, or just given two medals. That british gymnast blew my socks off, by the way. She could probably compete with the men on high bar.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
The British gymnast was 10 kinds of awesome. I've never seen that many releases on the uneven bars.

And actually according to recent polls, Americans are fairly highly regarded, whereas the French are pretty disliked overall. Most of that comes down to money though. Americans are big spenders and big tippers because they rarely go on vacation, so they spend a lot all at once. The French on the other hand get like six weeks vacation, so they bargain shop and cheap their way through each trip, stiffing people along the way. And in general Americans are actually considered fairly polite, while French people are considered somewhat rude.

But I don't think either of those, regarding politeness and rudeness, are the rule. I think the truth is somewhere in between.
 
Posted by brojack17 (Member # 9189) on :
 
I don't really have a problem with the French... The Canadians though... shesh! [Razz]
 
Posted by aspectre (Member # 2222) on :
 
MichaelPhelps is a wimp.
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
Mucus I don't know what the deal is but I am seriously contemplating the idea that you may possess astounding and completely innocent post-eating qualities that cause my lappy to wink out whenever I try to compose an elegant and respectful reply to your post. Twice in a row. On two different days.

haha. um. well, maybe tomorrow.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
It is a special ability I chose when I levelled up [Wink]
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Although I'm a little concerned that the threshold for "hacking" has dropped all the way to examining Google caches, I thought this was an cute tidbit.
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/08/20/1259253&from=rss
 
Posted by ketchupqueen (Member # 6877) on :
 
Define "cute"...

I think "forever" is a good answer, considering the way the IOC has behaved so far.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
cute: "1 a: clever or shrewd often in an underhanded manner"
 
Posted by ketchupqueen (Member # 6877) on :
 
Ah, gotcha. As in, "Don't get cute, now."
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
Ruqaya al Ghasara from Bahrain won her 200m heat wearing specially designed hijab: Awesome.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1046912/Muslim-sprinter-wins-Olympic-sprint-dressed-head-toe-hijab.html
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
I don't care what the color of the medal is that the American women's gymnastics team is wearing - in my heart it's gold. I believe they earned gold because they performed like champions, were good sports and gracious competitors, and they were within the rules. There is little doubt in my mind, with all the paperwork that has been uncovered, that the Chinese were competing underage athletes. They cheated. They got the gold, but they didn't earn it, not really.

If you watched any of the Pan-Am games, you'll see America has some dynamite 14 year olds too. Younger gymnasts are allowed to compete in those games, and we had one young eighth grader that was fantastic. She made floor finals, if I'm not mistaken.

Had we decided to disregard the rules of the competition and just throw our best athletes out there, I feel confident we would have won. But we didn't, we played fair and competed honestly, and the silver is the result. Count me very, very proud to say my country won the silver in that circumstance.
 
Posted by Elmer's Glue (Member # 9313) on :
 
If there is proof that they are lying, why aren't they being disqualified or something?
 
Posted by scholarette (Member # 11540) on :
 
The gymnasts have passports saying that they are of proper age. So what if up until recently everything listing their ages said that they are 14? Clearly those were all mistakes. The passports say 16, so they are 16.
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
This beach volleyball game is just nuts - the rain is crazy and the Chinese team are really pushing May-Treanor/Walsh to some very hard-earned points.

AND THEY WIN! AWESOME! What a match!
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
Those two are stunning.
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
That a was a very good match.

Did you see Haley Ishimatsu interviewed? I wonder why athletes think they have to say "I'm just happy to be here?" I mean, yes getting to the Olympics is a huge accomplishment, but it's okay to be upset and disappointed that you didn't move on - as she clearly was.

Well, I predict great things in her future should she stay healthy.
 
Posted by Starsnuffer (Member # 8116) on :
 
Yeah, that was awesome. i think she's trying to look past her present disappointment and say that overall she is/was happy to be at the olympics.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
I really felt for Ishimatsu during that interview. It was clear from her words that she was trying really hard to give the party line "I'm just happy to be here and compete" but I think it was obvious that she was crushed to not have moved on.

I think that showed a lot of maturity to try and get that out, despite the obvious disappointment she felt.
 
Posted by brojack17 (Member # 9189) on :
 
The softball final is on right now. The US is behind Japan in the 4th inning 2-0. The US has only won the Gold since softball became an olympic sport.

Make that 2-1. Crystal Bustos just hit a homer. That girl can hit.
 
Posted by brojack17 (Member # 9189) on :
 
Japan just beat the US in Softball. That's a big accomplishment. Congrats to Japan.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Ah, more cynicism. Corruption is fun [Smile]
quote:

...

On the question of the Chinese gymnast He Kexin’s age, one fact is certain, that is, there is an inconsistency between the local athletic bureau and the central athletic bureau. So, is it that:

1. The local athletic bureau is correct, and the central athletic bureau changed her age to older?

OR

2. The local athletic bureau falsified, and changed her age to younger?

In the eyes of foreign dudes (waiguo lao), so long as the gathered information, when put on a timeline, gives her age as 13 years old (presently 14 years old) first, then possibility 2 has the highest possibility. It shows that in its quest for gold, China will stoop to cheating. If this storyline is pushed forward some more, it can represent that China’s nationalism is grafted in such and such a way onto its totalitarian system, which will be terrifying like so, similar to 1936, etc….

An excellent storyline. But, from my experience in this country, it’s not like this. A greater possibility is, the local athletic bureau changed her age to younger, so she could participate in the Inter-City Competition. In truth, nearly all age-related alterations have happened in competitions internal to China. The goal is for the local sports officials, various levels of athletic schools, and parents to conspire and “rationally” exploit regulations to win more resources, honor, and — the biggest motivator of all — political achievements for the local sports officials and connected entities in the bureaucratic resource allocation game of the sports system.

In the Chinese bureacracy, this game has quietly gone on for years… the widespread extent of which, if one were to inquire, would be startling. It’s just that this time, this game has been exposed on the net and in the media, and has been found out… As can be seen below, He Kexin was a traded athlete in the Inter-City Competition, so the interests involved here are huge. If some mischief transpired, I wouldn’t be surprised…

...

Then the author provides two appendices. The first appendix is a newspaper article on the Inter-City Competition, with a paragraph that states an age-limit band of 13 to 15 years for gymnastics. The article also notes that the Inter-City Competition is mostly a proving ground for the 2012 Olympics.

The second appendix is a partial list of traded athletes between various local athletic bureaus. He Kexin is listed as being on loan for 2 years by the Beijing Bureau to the Wuhan Bureau. Birthday is listed as 1994 in this list, and seems to be essentially the same database that “the foreigners” found online. He Kexin would be useless to the Wuhan Bureau for the 2007 Inter-City Competition, if her real birthday was in 1992, making her over 15.

In fact, in the comments to a prior post, I’ve raised the point that Chinese parents change birthdays of children quite often for a variety of reasons or advantages, to older or younger, hence the possibility that things could go either way with He Kexin. He really could be 16, yet still nobody would want to come out and explain the age changing in local competitions — that’s just another can of worms. Anyway, this certainly isn’t proof of anything nor is it great news. The point is simply that, before jumping to conclusions on something having to with China, it is worth considering the other possilities, and at the least, consider that other possibilities do exist.

Finally, I hope this kind of fudging the formality culture is lost in China. It really is bad for the development of the rule of law.

link
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
An amusing anecdote on the cheering behaviour of Chinese crowds by Tim Johnson:
quote:
... I find Chinese behavior in the Olympic stands containing complexities beyond this. For sure, some Chinese would like to beat the Americans in every way possible, and that means rooting for third nations that play against the U.S. teams.

At other times, I’ve seen them root for the underdog. That occurred in a Russia-Georgia beach volleyball match. The crowd was going for the little guy against someone they perceived as a bully.

Then there are the times Chinese root for those who play well. That happened at an Argentina-Brazil soccer game earlier this week. The crowd was for Argentina, which won 3-0.

Then an interesting thing happened: The crowd began chanting, “Xie Yalong, xia ke!" – which means, “Xie Yalong, take a hike!” Xier Yalong is president of the Chinese Football Association and a national whipping boy because Chinese love soccer but can’t seem to put together a decent team.

So there you have it: Sometimes Chinese fans root for the underdog. Sometimes they root for the dominant team. And sometimes they even chant against their own side if it doesn’t live up to expectations. There could be a political message in that.

link
 
Posted by lobo (Member # 1761) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong:
Ruqaya al Ghasara from Bahrain won her 200m heat wearing specially designed hijab: Awesome.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1046912/Muslim-sprinter-wins-Olympic-sprint-dressed-head-toe-hijab.html

I notice she still has the great satan (nike) on her chest...
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by brojack17:
Japan just beat the US in Softball. That's a big accomplishment. Congrats to Japan.

That's a HUGE accomplishment. I don't believe it.

Good for them.
 
Posted by brojack17 (Member # 9189) on :
 
And good for softball. Part of the reason for softball being kicked out of the Olympics was because no one could compete with the US. The US only got better but so did the rest of the world.

The Japanese pitcher was amazing. She threw over 400 pitches in two days. I can't image how sore her arm is now. Probably nothing a little gold won't cure.
 
Posted by Annie (Member # 295) on :
 
The Japan-US softball upset was AWESOME. It was funny reading the Yahoo article , which was very sad and gloomy, and then seeing how yahoo.jp covered it.
 
Posted by Annie (Member # 295) on :
 
Heh. The top 6 finishers in the women's 200 were all Jamaicans and Americans. More fuel for my wry French roommmate's ongoing commentary. [Smile]

Also, Allyson Felix is totally cute.
 
Posted by ketchupqueen (Member # 6877) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong:
Ruqaya al Ghasara from Bahrain won her 200m heat wearing specially designed hijab: Awesome.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1046912/Muslim-sprinter-wins-Olympic-sprint-dressed-head-toe-hijab.html

That's awesomeness. [Smile] Didn't a Muslim woman compete in a swim event a while back in a head-to-toe swimsuit, too? I really loved what she said:

quote:
'I hope that my wearing the hijood sports top will inspire other women to see that modesty or religious beliefs don’t have to be a barrier to participating in competitive sports.'


I'd love to see a Mormon woman on the beach volleyball team get accomodation wearing a full top instead of a bikini someday or something. I think it's fantastic that her country and designers from Australia worked together to accomodate her religious beliefs while allowing her to compete. [Smile]
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
Jeebus Tapdancing Mozus! Why is everyone going to such huge extremes to "prove" that the Chinese girls are 14 not 16!? Don't they realize they'ld probably be doing something worse like making shoes, or going to rice paddies or :shuddder: middle school?

I have a single response. So what? Who the frak cares? This is probably the best thing to happen for them, the ones that get medals will probably be made for life, give them a break stop nitpicking concentrate on real news and stop looking for sensationalist fluff.
 
Posted by ketchupqueen (Member # 6877) on :
 
Blayne, it's CHEATING. Why would we not care that the country hosting the games is cheating?
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
Blayne, you are so ignorant it is ridiculous. It MATTERS because once again we are ham stringed because WE don't cheat and they do. It isn't a nitpick at all.


Take off the rose-colored glasses, just for a second, and you will see that.

And this is HARDLY going to extremes. The info was there for anyone to see if they just looked.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Its also kinda interesting, so I pass along tidbits as they come up. I can't say I "care" so much as I'm curious.
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
I'm not complaining about you, Im just complaining about the media.

I don't know, getting "computer experts" and "forensics specialists" is I think going to extremes.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Mass media needs to sell stories. Scandals are popular, Olympic scandals where a team gets cheated are pretty good. Canadian media focuses on Canadian athletes who supposedly get screwed by cheating, American media focuses on American athletes who supposedly get screwed by cheating. Time honored tradition.
Add in a dash of Chinese vs. American rivalry and you have media gold.

In this case, its almost certainly true that cheating occurred at some level or another which is an added bonus.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Blayne Bradley:
I'm not complaining about you, Im just complaining about the media.

I don't know, getting "computer experts" and "forensics specialists" is I think going to extremes.

Well accusing a country especially the tender Chinese of cheating is a serious accusation.

The Olympics are supposed to represent the epitome of athletic integrity and prowess.

Sullying that ideal when it is so important to the rest of the world is disrespectful at best, outrageous at worst.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
The IOC has officially asked FIG (International Federation of Gymnastics) to commit to an inquiry over the age controversy regarding the Chinese women's gymnastics team.
 
Posted by James Tiberius Kirk (Member # 2832) on :
 
Someone help me out -- why was the Men's Beach Volleyball gold medal game over when the US had 15 points? I thought the game ended only when one team had at least 21 points and a 2 point margin?

--j_k
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Not for the third set. The third set is played to 15.
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
Yes but I don't think it matters, c'mon if they're good enough to compete they should be able to compete.

You don't see people forcing Sergey Karjakin to not participate in Chess Tournaments.
 
Posted by ketchupqueen (Member # 6877) on :
 
The FIG made that rule and the IOC adopted it for the protection of the gymnasts. It doesn't matter whether you think it should be a rule; it's a rule. If some people are following the rules and some are not that's not a level playing field.

It's like just because someone don't agree with anti-doping rules doesn't mean they don't need to be followed.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
quote:
If some people are following the rules and some are not that's not a level playing field.
I think this is where Blayne's argument falls apart the most. It's one thing to say that you disagree with the rule and that no one should have to follow it, but it's an entirely different thing to say that you disagree with the rule and won't follow it, even though everyone else is.

The thing is Blayne, what if Romania, Russia, Japan, America and other traditional gymnastics powerhouses also have really good 14 year olds but instead played by the rules and lost because China didn't play by the rules? You really think that's fair?
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
And, as I pointed out above - we do. The US DOES have some good 14 year olds, every country does.

However, I admit we are still going to be behind the Chinese, because USA gymnastics mandates that elite training cannot begin until age 10. That is for the protection of the athletes and their still-growing bodies.

The Chinese begin elite training as early as 3. So, naturally, they are going to have more elite gymnasts who have had more years of that kind of training. Because of that, the ONLY way we can compete with them on a remotely level playing field is if the 16 year old rule is followed.
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
So, uh...

How 'bout those indoor men's volleyball players, taking Russia right down to the wire? Another solid match to get the US in another gold-medal volleyball match.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ketchupqueen:
...
It's like just because someone don't agree with anti-doping rules doesn't mean they don't need to be followed.

Agreed, if only the endless revolving door stream of 'Free Tibet' activists setting up in Beijing, tipping off Western journalists, getting filmed, and then being detained within a few minutes and deported got that message too.
 
Posted by Eduardo_Sauron (Member # 5827) on :
 
quote:
So, uh...

How 'bout those indoor men's volleyball players, taking Russia right down to the wire? Another solid match to get the US in another gold-medal volleyball match.

They'll be facing our (my) beloved Brazilian team, the defending champions. So it should be a fantastic game. Actually, we'll have another Brazil X USA in women's Volleyball too. It's becoming something of a classic game [Cool]
 
Posted by scholarette (Member # 11540) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Blayne Bradley:
Yes but I don't think it matters, c'mon if they're good enough to compete they should be able to compete.

You don't see people forcing Sergey Karjakin to not participate in Chess Tournaments.

Chess does not have the potential to do as much damage to children as gymnastics does. This is a rule to protect the girls from what could be called abuse.
 
Posted by Eduardo_Sauron (Member # 5827) on :
 
[sarcasm] But there isn't such thing as child abuse in Chinese society. That's crazy talk. [sarcasm]
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
Blayne: As a few pointed out, the rule stands so as to protect younger gymnasts from being pushed too hard to compete in the Olympics at a young age. I'd rather a 13 year old, who will turn 14 the year of the Olympics, wait until they turn 18 at the next one.

As far as gymnastics is concerned, it's an incredibly competitive and dangerous sport as is. One wrong landing and your entire gymnastics career is over. Of course injuries will still happen, but they are reduced by this rule.
 
Posted by ketchupqueen (Member # 6877) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
quote:
Originally posted by ketchupqueen:
...
It's like just because someone don't agree with anti-doping rules doesn't mean they don't need to be followed.

Agreed, if only the endless revolving door stream of 'Free Tibet' activists setting up in Beijing, tipping off Western journalists, getting filmed, and then being detained within a few minutes and deported got that message too.
Yeah, as much as I am not pleased with China's politics, it's really stupid to do that. They don't even bother to learn Mandarin first so people might know what they're doing.
 
Posted by Annie (Member # 295) on :
 
quote:
They don't even bother to learn Mandarin first so people might know what they're doing.
To be fair, it's not like that's just something you can check off the list. Do we have the banners? Yep. Flyers? Yep. Did someone remember to learn Mandarin? Yeah - Charlie picked it up last Tuesday.
 
Posted by Rakeesh (Member # 2001) on :
 
quote:
Agreed, if only the endless revolving door stream of 'Free Tibet' activists setting up in Beijing, tipping off Western journalists, getting filmed, and then being detained within a few minutes and deported got that message too.
Mucus, do you mean this literally, or are you being pithy?

---------

Boy, there are lots of ways in which chess is like Olympian gymnastics.
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
quote:
Yeah, as much as I am not pleased with China's politics, it's really stupid to do that. They don't even bother to learn Mandarin first so people might know what they're doing.
They're not intending to communicate with the people in China.
 
Posted by Rakeesh (Member # 2001) on :
 
Yeah, I mean I rather thought that was obvious.
 
Posted by scholarette (Member # 11540) on :
 
I was just reading an article arguing that synchro swimming should be eliminated from the Olympics. I LOVE synchro swimming. I was very disappointed by it being on at 2am only and am planning to watch the videos on nbc when I get a chance (my husband wants to watch with me and baby goes crazy whenever we try to watch things on our computer which makes it harder).

Anyone else think it is an awesome sport or do most people agree that it isn't Olympic worthy?
 
Posted by Elmer's Glue (Member # 9313) on :
 
I think it is pretty boring, although I saw the two person Russian team and it was pretty good because they were going much faster than I have seen before.
Synchronized diving is just awful though.
 
Posted by imogen (Member # 5485) on :
 
I just watched the men's 10m diving final.

Matthew Mitcham's final dive was awesome.

The Australian commentators were really funny - they had expected the Chinese diver to win, and so were treating it like a foregone conclusion. 'Til Mitcham scored 112.10.
 
Posted by Zhil (Member # 10504) on :
 
Ref gets a faceful of feet; feet's owner faces bannination

How angry was Cuban Taekwondo competitor Angel Matos? Angry enough to kick the ref in the face with the foot with a broken toe. Hrmmm.

[edit:
quote:
"This is an insult to the Olympic vision, an insult to the spirit of taekwondo and, in my opinion, an insult to mankind," Yang said.
His behavior was unsportsmanlike, but wow, what hyperbole. Yang takes his martial arts very seriously. [Embarrassed] ]

Did any channel cover Taekwondo? I only get basic cable, and most of the coverage I've managed to catch has been running/swimming/gymnastic stuff. And youtube doesn't have any of it either. [Frown]
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
quote:
Anyone else think it is an awesome sport or do most people agree that it isn't Olympic worthy?
I don't see why it can't be both. I think it's difficult to do, and has an entertainment value to it, but I don't think it should be an Olympic sport. If you read the article that I read, they were also talking about rhythmic gymnastics, which I also don't think should be an Olympic sport, along with a half dozen other sports that shouldn't count. And for that matter, I think half the categories, races, rounds etc within each sport should be eliminated as well. I don't think there needs to be 300 different kinds of swimming and track races. I don't think table tennis or badmitton should be in there at all either.

How long before Rugby and Lacrosse get added? I know Rugby is really more of an English imperialist sport, like cricket, but baseball isn't really something that goes beyond the Americas and Japan. I mean are we just adding EVERYTHING into the mix? Olympic Tag? I suppose that'll have two different medals though, because there will have to be one for Olympic freeze tag. Olympic marching band?

I don't think the sanctity of the games would be harmed one bit by cutting back a bit.
 
Posted by Zhil (Member # 10504) on :
 
South Korea is also pretty crazy about baseball. Baseball teams are named after the companies that sponsor them:
LG vs Samsung
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Three comments on that:

1. Thunder sticks: The quintessential American export.

2. Like 80% of the stadium is empty.

3. They have to bring those people dancing on the dugouts between innings to a baseball game here. And the Korean music too. It's catchy.

Edit to add: I stand corrected, I just looked it up and Thundersticks are actually Korean, and later gained popularity here. You'd think cheap, really loud annoying pieces of plastic filled with hot air would be more easily associated with Americans, but I guess not.
 
Posted by ketchupqueen (Member # 6877) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Annie:
quote:
They don't even bother to learn Mandarin first so people might know what they're doing.
To be fair, it's not like that's just something you can check off the list. Do we have the banners? Yep. Flyers? Yep. Did someone remember to learn Mandarin? Yeah - Charlie picked it up last Tuesday.
Well, duh.

But they could at the very least, if they're not able to go in-depth in their study of the Chinese language and culture, hire someone to teach them a few key phrases in Mandarin. At least. As it is they're pretty obviously doing it just for the American media. As much as I sympathise with their cause I really don't with their methods.
 
Posted by Zhil (Member # 10504) on :
 
I agree that they should cut the fat for the events, I'm just putting it out there. And I'm pretty sure that attendance rate is average for most baseball games, no matter what nationality.

...

FYI S. Korea [edit: men's] baseball team won gold yesterday. [Big Grin]

[edit also: K-POP! [Mad] So insidious.]
 
Posted by ketchupqueen (Member # 6877) on :
 
quote:
You'd think cheap, really loud annoying pieces of plastic filled with hot air would be more easily associated with Americans, but I guess not.
I take it you've never been to a Korean New Year party. [Big Grin]

(I grew up in an area with lots of Koreans and as such have had a chance to partake of many Korean cultural experiences. Many of them are not at all what you'd expect...)

I got a kick out of watching the end of the baseball game this morning when the catcher got thrown out for arguing with the ump. We had the sound down and subtitles on so I could just look at him instead of listening to the commentators and it was funny how polite his angry gestures were.

I also got annoyed at the commentators. I am one of the people who actually needs commentary to follow a baseball game, and I didn't like missing half the action while they talked about yesterday's US game and how well the team did considering and blah blah blah. You're paid to talk about the game, talk about it already!!!
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
The US team sports had a HUGE night, and I'm very glad I stayed up to watch as much of it as possible. [Smile]
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Rakeesh:
Mucus, do you mean this literally, or are you being pithy?

Erm, maybe both?
Anyways, I think that if someone associated with the Chinese gymnasts is cheating at some level or another than thats a shame. I also think that the type of protests I described are silly and ultimately probably counter-productive to the cause of bringing more freedom to Tibet (and possibly to China as a whole).

This is not to say that there is any connection or moral equivalence between to the two scenarios, or even to make a larger point about whether one should follow a just law. It just was the first example that crossed my mind associated with the Olympics where people would probably be better off just following the rules.
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
This may not be the appropriate place to post this - but hey, I'm a proud mama.

My daughter had her first gymnastics meet of the competitive season and her team placed first. She herself won gold on the uneven bars and siler on beam. She came in 4th in the all-around, due to some lower scores on vault and floor (where I think she placed sixth and fifth, respectively.)

Regardless, winning gold on her favorite event has her really excited. [Smile]
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
[Party] Congratulations - both to her and to a proud mother!

---

I can't wait to see the men's volleyball game tonight. My heart was in my throat just watching the scores last night; it must have been a crazy game. [Smile]
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
quote:
I also got annoyed at the commentators. I am one of the people who actually needs commentary to follow a baseball game, and I didn't like missing half the action while they talked about yesterday's US game and how well the team did considering and blah blah blah. You're paid to talk about the game, talk about it already!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I tell you one thing also, about announcing. I saw the synchronized swimming events, and they discussed how the Chinese hired a Russian coach, and that coach was shocked when a swimmer asked for "a weekend off" to go home and see her family whom she had not seen in 10 years.

Now, the announcer then went on to say something about what extraordinary dedication that showed. I'm sorry, that's not dedicated - that's sick and twisted. Girls leaving home and not allowed to see their families for a decade, and not getting one weekend off in that time - there's nothing admirable there. Nothing that should receive any type of positive comment from the announcers.
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
American news media appears to be claiming the US has won due to having more "total" medals but the Official Olympics website and for that matter historical precedent of every preceding Olympics games China has won due to having the most Gold medals.

The American propoganda machine at work.

Now if they had a score system of say a Gold worth 4, silver 2 and bronze 1 and totaled it up to USA having more points then fine, math doesn't lie but there doesn't appear to be the case.
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
In my past experiences of watching the games - the overall medal count is usually what has been touted as the biggest achievement.

But, usually the person who wins the most medals is also the one who wins the most golds. In this case, it isn't.
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
No, its nearly always been which country has the most gold.
 
Posted by imogen (Member # 5485) on :
 
I've been irritated with the news media here making a big deal of the fact that some of the gold medallists from other countries had Australian coaches (particularly in cycling and swimming).

'It's really a gold for Australia!' and so on. And of course no mention of the fact that a *lot* of the coaches for the Australian competitors are from different countries (diving, gymnastics, weightlifting and so on).
 
Posted by scholarette (Member # 11540) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Blayne Bradley:
No, its nearly always been which country has the most gold.

I recall the total medal count as being the most important thing in the past, not the gold. Do you some some actual basis for making your claim?
 
Posted by ketchupqueen (Member # 6877) on :
 
Belle and Blayne, you're both right. The American media tends to put the "winner" of the medal count as the one with the most overall medals.

The rest of the world tends to count the medal count race only in who has the most golds.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Decent summary here
quote:
The reason is due to a divide between the U.S. and the rest of the world. The U.S. -- actually its media, including The Wall Street Journal -- ranks countries by all the medals a team wins.
...
The rest of the world ranks countries by golds. Silver and bronze are used only as tie-breakers. ...

The split has its roots in the early days of the Olympics and reflects the movement's evolution, from an organization that sought to eliminate nations' victories over one another to one that celebrates them. And while it's primarily a quirky point for most people, the difference in the medal tables arguably has its serious side too. Some see in the gold-first ranking -- which is unofficially endorsed by the International Olympic Committee -- one reason why countries have become increasingly ruthless in cutting funding for sports where they don't have a clear shot at a gold.

...

Raising the issue with the IOC does no good, Mr. Shvets says, because "they say it's not official. Everybody says it's not official." Yet despite that, the gold counts are sometimes prominently displayed. In Sydney in 2000, Mr. Shvets says, there was a tall tower in the Olympic area that showed the top medal-winning countries -- golds only. "They updated it every day," he says.

Beyond the frustration, a more serious issue is that the tables are taken seriously by sports officials around the world. Over the past few years, an array of countries, from Australia and Japan to France and Germany, have begun adopting policies aimed at gold. They have done so by cutting funding for sports that aren't likely to win gold. The German motto for this year's Games is "maintain 6th in Beijing and move to 5th in London" -- based on the gold-first tally. Funding is being tailored accordingly, according to German sports officials.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121856271893833843.html
 
Posted by Dagonee (Member # 5818) on :
 
Just to emphasize, this is not a new way of ranking the medals. From Mucus's link:

quote:
As for the Associated Press in New York, it "has always aggregated it by total medals for as long as we can remember," said its sports-statistics editor Paul Montella. For non-U.S. customers, however, AP provides the gold-first table.
Blayne, perhaps you could cite some evidence that this is a new way of ranking within the United States?
 
Posted by pooka (Member # 5003) on :
 
quote:
Finally, I hope this kind of fudging the formality culture is lost in China. It really is bad for the development of the rule of law.
I mentioned it a few pages back, but age doesn't matter to the Chinese. The nearest correlation I can think of is how Americans don't care about gender. Chinese don't see the enforcement of age limits as a matter for the rule of law. Or, I think I may have compared it to highway speed limits before. In America, I know plenty of people who drive 7-9 miles over the limit who also say things like "it's too bad we don't enforce our laws more strictly."
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Blayne Bradley:
American news media appears to be claiming the US has won due to having more "total" medals but the Official Olympics website and for that matter historical precedent of every preceding Olympics games China has won due to having the most Gold medals.

The American propoganda machine at work.

Now if they had a score system of say a Gold worth 4, silver 2 and bronze 1 and totaled it up to USA having more points then fine, math doesn't lie but there doesn't appear to be the case.

Blayne,
I don't think you should even comment on anyone elses propaganda. [Smile]


That being said, ALL of the American coverage I have seen has made a huge deal about the overall gold count as well as the overall medal count. Each time they mention the overall count, which is what most American's have always followed, they ALWAYS mention the overall gold count, with China in the lead.

Perhaps your problem is with your OWN preconceptions about the US. Just a thought.....
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
You can call us second place if you want, it doesn't bother me any. Considering the different approaches between the US and China when it comes to the Olympics, I'm totally satisfied with how we did (well, possibly excepting the implosion of US Track, but that's another fight for another day).

I don't have a problem losing to a country with four times our population who spends billions and billions on training and yanks kids from their homes to train seven or eight hours a day without seeing their families. If that's what it takes to win, I'll proudly take second place.
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
Lyrhawn, I totally agree.

And now, my shameless promotion continues.

My daughter's gymnastics meet

With apologies for the quality, because I'm still learning about producing videos and uploading them to YouTube.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Random thoughts during the (annoying long) closing ceremonies (CBC broadcast)
* Damn the preamble and associated retrospectives and stuff are boring, I should have checked the schedule to see when the actual ceremony starts
* Well, I'm glad that Zhang Yimou is getting a chance to get ludicrous amounts of people doing random stuff out of his system. Maybe we won't have to see another Curse of the Golden Flower-esque CGI crowd spectacular
* Mmmm, speech by in Mandarin with English and French tidbits
* The end to the Olympic flame is somewhat bittersweet. It was fun to see the media focus on China in its flawed way in China and the associated blog tidbits and random documentaries. Still it will be nice to see Beijing/China go back to normal.
* Ahhhh, finally some good and big fireworks to celebrate. If you're going to do fireworks you may as well use more explosives than probably exist in our military. Woo-eee
* I feel kinda embarresed to say that I find that "Wo ai Beijing" song kinda catchy and fun (Wikipedia tells me that it involves Kelly Chen of Infernal Affairs, Breaking News (good) and Empress film (bad) fame)
* Kinda too much singing but....

* Jackie Chan! Andy Lau! Karen Mok! Woooo! Hong Kong celebrity invasion!

Canada did decently, China topped the medal standings, and Hong Kong invaded the closing ceremonies at the last minute, screw medals. I'm satisfied [Smile]
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
I love the Internet. A search for that song (mmm, erhu a-go-go) on Youtube gives as the top two results, Stephen Chow's very funny and subversive "From Beijing With Love" parody of James Band which is banned in China (heh) and the amusing "Sexy Beijing" series of webisodes.
 
Posted by Rakeesh (Member # 2001) on :
 
quote:
No, its nearly always been which country has the most gold.
Remember, guys. This is a question of history, and we all know who's right in those!
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
The video was adorable, Belle.
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
I distinctly remember conversations I had in the '80s about why America kept track of the total medal count instead of the gold count, and specifically noted that it served to help promote smaller countries whose athletes might not win gold, but still deserved to be honored for their efforts. Reducing the medal count to the golds reduces the Olympics to a sporting event, which it most assuredly is not meant only to be.
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Rakeesh:
quote:
No, its nearly always been which country has the most gold.
Remember, guys. This is a question of history, and we all know who's right in those!
I am.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by TomDavidson:
... promote smaller countries whose athletes might not win gold, but still deserved to be honored for their efforts.

Technically, if you look at say the CBC medal table http://www.cbc.ca/olympics/ which is sorted by gold medals, the smaller countries that only won silver or bronze medals still show up in the rankings. After all, silver and bronze medals have to be used to break ties when two countries tie with the same number of golds, the smaller nations are just all "tied" with 0 golds.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Belle -

Good camera work, and I thought the music an excellent choice too. That beam routine was pretty neat, with the handstand at the end and the flip thing.

Very cool. [Smile]
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
Thank you guys. [Smile]

My hubby did the camera work.

It's important to remember that the vast majority of girls who do gymnastics look like her - they are going to local meets, with only their parents there, and cheering on each other and having fun.

They won't ever be Shawn Johnson or Nastia Liukin, but they do it because it's fun and they love it. [Smile]

For a first meet, Em did pretty good - a gold and a silver is not bad at all, but she told me on the way home she had lots of room for improvement. [Wink] Which is what its about - pushing yourself to get better and go further and accepting disappointment and getting back on the beam when you fall.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Zhil:
Ref gets a faceful of feet; feet's owner faces bannination

I do have to say, that's an awesomely scary photo.
 
Posted by Rakeesh (Member # 2001) on :
 
Yeah, I saw that too. Frankly-and not just because I'm no fan of Cuba-I wonder if the penalties should not have spread beyond the athlete and the coach. I have to wonder if this sort of hot-headedness, poor sportsmanship, aggression, and childishness could have gone unnoticed by the rest of the Cuban Olympic group, or sprung up overnight.
 
Posted by Paul Goldner (Member # 1910) on :
 
On the number of events at the olympics:

The more the merrier. One of the things the olympics has done in the past is helped spread regional sports around the globe. Just as an example: Beach volleyball used to be a south california, brazilian game. Its not anymore.

The games are one of the only times that many of these athletes have what is essentially their life's work recognized. I understand that most people NEVER do, but why take the opportunity away from some people who are getting seen? Its not like having Trampoline at the olympics actually reduces the amount of gymnastics or track you can watch, given the proliferation of olympic-carrying channels. hell, OXYGEN carried olympics this year.
 
Posted by scholarette (Member # 11540) on :
 
Belle- I think it is good for your daughter to not be Shawn or Nastia. Much more fun. My sister was not Olympic level, but she was dang good. She quit because it just got too much. She was expected to basically starve herself. She could barely keep up with school and they wanted even more hours at the gym. To pay for all the training she "needed" was putting my parents pretty deeply in debt. Lots of quit being so tall comments (cause she could control that and I think she is pretty short). And lots of injuries- mostly minor, but almost constantly one thing or another. At the higher levels, most of the fun is gone.
 
Posted by brojack17 (Member # 9189) on :
 
Great video Belle. Congrats on the gold and silver.

I miss the Olympics already. Hopefully I'll be able to see some of the Paralympics. I'm really looking forward to the Qual Rugby.
 
Posted by Belle (Member # 2314) on :
 
scholarette, I agree. Our gym won't train elite level. Our coach it's just too hard and it becomes, as you said, no fun. His gym is only open three nights a week, and he won't train anyone on a tougher schedule than that. We also have no weigh-ins, or recommended diets, or any of that stuff. While it's certainly not cheap, it's comparable to other sports and activities - in other words, not outrageous.

It is supposed to be fun, and I've always told her the day it seems like a chore and not something fun, is the day we quit.
 
Posted by BandoCommando (Member # 7746) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lyrhawn:
[QUOTE]Olympic marching band?

Hey now, I think this could be pretty cool! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
I'm not saying I wouldn't watch. [Smile]
 
Posted by TheBlueShadow (Member # 9718) on :
 
Olympic marching band would be awesome.

I like a lot of the lesser known/played sports like badminton, trampoline, etc..

Past sports that are no longer played at the Olympics include:

Cricket
Croquet
Golf
Jeu de paume
Lacrosse
Pelote basque
Polo
Power boating
Rackets
Rink-hockey
Roque
Rugby
Tug of war
Water skiing
http://www.olympic.org/uk/sports/past/index_uk.asp

I suppose baseball and softball can now be added to that list since this was supposed to be their last Olympics.

There are a lot of recognized sports that aren't actually part of the Olympic games.
http://www.olympic.org/uk/sports/recognized/index_uk.asp
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Rink-hockey?
 
Posted by TheBlueShadow (Member # 9718) on :
 
I think it's roller hockey.
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
The font of all knowledge claims it was a demonstration sport at the 1992 Games in Barcelona.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
A compromise with an entirely different way of viewing the medal counts [Wink]
link
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Post Olympics grab-bag of news:

Beijing starts enacting the post-Olympic plans for venues:
quote:

The NBA and private developers have been signed up to run stadiums and arenas. The Water Cube swimming centre, due to become a public pool, raised money by licensing its name for a bottled water brand. The Bird's Nest is taking bids from companies for naming rights.

...

The Bird's Nest will be the highest-profile test case for the city's ability to make them financially viable.

It has the advantage that it is the first big, modern stadium in a city where the main venue for rock concerts and sports has been the drab Workers Stadium, a 58,000-seat hulk built in 1959. But the new facility's huge size and potentially high user fees could put it beyond the reach of many events.

...

The Water Cube raised money by licensing its name for use on swimsuits and on bottled water made from Canadian icebergs.

Beijing began charting the venues' future almost as soon as it was awarded the games in 2001.

Athlete housing was designed from the start as luxury apartments, with swimming pools, tennis courts, coffee shops and shopping. Chinese media say units sold out ahead of the games for prices of $2,900-$4,400 per square metre, high even for Beijing's booming real estate market.

http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5gD9DBqgiaDvqBYq-Q_HEOavNWFOg

As a background, a brief history of Olympics venues after the games
http://www.independent.co.uk/extras/features/after-the-party-what-happens-when-the-olympics-leave-town-901629.html

In an odd piece of timing Sydney is retrospectively caught doing "lip-syncing" with an *entire orchestra*:
quote:

Eight years after Sydney hosted the 2000 Summer Olympics, officials with the Sydney Symphony Orchestra acknowledged their stirring performance at the opening ceremony was entirely prerecorded. And perhaps even more cringe-inducing for Sydney residents: some of the music was recorded by the symphony of rival city Melbourne.

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080829/australia_orchestra_080829/20080829?hub=World

And finally, an opinion poll on the results of the games as conducted in Hong Kong
quote:

* (809 persons age 18 or over interviewed by telephone August 24-28, 2008 at response rate of 48.2%)

Q6. The Beijing Olympics are now over. Overall, do you think that the Beijing Olympics was successful?
1.6%: Very unsuccessful
2.1%: Somewhat unsuccessful
25.8%: Somewhat successful
68.7%: Very successful
1.7%: Don't know/hard to say

Q7. Which of the following is the most important standard by which you judge the success of the Beijing Olympics
4.9%: The number of gold medals won by China
57.1%: Beijing was able to complete the Olympics safely and smoothly

2.0%: The number of foreign VIP's attending the Beijing Olympics
31.1%: The media were able to report the Olympics and the situation in China
2.7%: Other
3.5%: Don't know/hard to say

Q8. Are you proud of China hosting the Olympics?
41.2%: Very proud
43.4%: Somewhat proud
12.9%: Not proud
1.6%: Not proud at all
1.0%: Don't know/hard to say

Q9. Do you feel that the Beijing Olympics has changed the image of China?
1.2%: Became worse
7.9%: No change
89.5%: Became better
1.4%: Don't know/hard to say

http://www.zonaeuropa.com/200808c.brief.htm#030

The highlighted bit is interesting since the gold medal winners will be sent to Hong Kong pretty soon in an alleged effort to influence the upcoming Hong Kong elections toward the pro-Beijing candidates.
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Blayne Bradley:
quote:
Originally posted by Rakeesh:
quote:
No, its nearly always been which country has the most gold.
Remember, guys. This is a question of history, and we all know who's right in those!
I am.
In your dreams. [Wink]


Billiards/pool is trying to be the next summer sport allowed in, and looks to have an inside track to do so.

I can't wait. [Smile]
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
And here I'd thought ballroom dancing would be next... [Wink]
 


Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2