This is topic Hypothetical Situation in forum Books, Films, Food and Culture at Hatrack River Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.hatrack.com/ubb/main/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=053554

Posted by Tsinya (Member # 11724) on :
 
In your opinion, do you think you would kill one innocent person in order to save the lives of 2 innocent people? 10? 100?

Here's some scenarios:

A train, carrying a few hundred people is headed towards a break in the tracks. Would you pull a lever to switch it to another track if a person was standing on that track, with no way to get off? (say his shoelace is caught on the rail.) Or would you just let whatever happen happen in order to keep your hands clean?
--------------------
You enter a room with 11 people tied up. A terrorist walks up to you and hands you a gun and tells you that if you don't kill the 11th person, he will kill the other 10. Would you do it? Or would you refuse and say that it's not your fault what this man decides to do? (And just because I know someone's going to say this, pretend you cannot shoot the terrorist)


Do you think it is ever moral to kill someone to save many more people's lives? Would your oppinion change if you had to kill them your self?
 
Posted by MattP (Member # 10495) on :
 
I think it can be moral, but is ambiguous enough that I would find no moral fault in either choice. I don't know what I would choose.
 
Posted by rollainm (Member # 8318) on :
 
What would YOU do? Hmm...?
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
The only correct option in these situations is to shoot the ethics professor.
 
Posted by Elmer's Glue (Member # 9313) on :
 
It really depends on the situation. With the train I would probably pull the lever. With the terrorist I wouldn't even consider doing it.
 
Posted by orlox (Member # 2392) on :
 
lol@tom
 
Posted by James Tiberius Kirk (Member # 2832) on :
 
Hi. Welcome to Hatrack.

--j_k
 
Posted by neo-dragon (Member # 7168) on :
 
I'd probably pull the lever and shoot the 11th person. There's really no logical reason not to take the path of least death in both scenarios. Keeping your own hand clean at the expense of other people's lives seems kind of selfish.
 
Posted by Tante Shvester (Member # 8202) on :
 
Shoot the terrorist, I suppose.
 
Posted by ClaudiaTherese (Member # 923) on :
 
I would shoot whomever is posting this question (worded exactly the same) on other boards with a ethics-increasing gun, as he/she should be doing his/her own homework, instead of just mining for answers.
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by TomDavidson:
The only correct option in these situations is to shoot the ethics professor.

I was thinking the exact same thing. [Smile]
 
Posted by rollainm (Member # 8318) on :
 
Tsinya,

My first response was from my phone and it would have been a bit too cumbersome to look up the link, but here you go.

Have fun. [Smile]
 
Posted by LargeTuna (Member # 10512) on :
 
for the terrorist one, i might shoot myself to save the 10 other people

What would YOU Do? (theres a youtube video titled this, not exactly apropriate for hatrack though)
 
Posted by Darth_Mauve (Member # 4709) on :
 
There are many causes for which I would die.

There are very few for which I would kill.
 


Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2