This is topic 'Dollhouse' Whedon's newest, strangest work in forum Books, Films, Food and Culture at Hatrack River Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.hatrack.com/ubb/main/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=054764

Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
Just posted my review of the 1st episode of "Dollhouse," coming Friday the 13th on FOX. Not terribly spoilery.

Short version: It's good. It'll get better. Watch it.
 
Posted by Uprooted (Member # 8353) on :
 
Sounds intriguing; thanks for the review.

quote:
This is the sort of thing that makes writers hate Whedon just a little bit.

[Wink]
 
Posted by scifibum (Member # 7625) on :
 
I find the show intriguing but my reasons are entirely adolescent. (All the "Actives" are female, and have a certain physical profile, right?) Is there enough else going on that I won't have to be embarrassed to watch this with my wife?
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
You'll like the show, then. Seemingly gratuitous scene in the 1st ep (although there are reasons for it). And the guy actives are in just as good a shape as the girls.
 
Posted by Tara (Member # 10030) on :
 
I like your newspaper-headline thread titles.
 
Posted by Achilles (Member # 7741) on :
 
Been waiting for the 13th just for that reason, Chris.

Thanks.
 
Posted by twinky (Member # 693) on :
 
Whoops, I meant to watch this last weekend but forgot.

Edit: Wait, it hasn't aired yet? Sweet, I haven't missed it!
 
Posted by plaid (Member # 2393) on :
 
NPR's got Joss on sometime in the next half hour (on East Coast anyway, or, well, central VA anyway).
 
Posted by plaid (Member # 2393) on :
 
On now!
 
Posted by Achilles (Member # 7741) on :
 
*stocks up on popcorn*
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Huh.

BSG, Dollhouse, and Terminator on Fridays
House, Heroes, and Big Bang Theory on Mondays

They gotta start spreading this stuff out.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
That's what Hulu is for.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
FOX had a music video of the theme song (or a version of the theme song) up briefly, then took it down. Here it is (for now).
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Unfortunately, Hulu doesn't seem to serve internationally. Luckily, there is yet another form of streamed content, one which may be compared to flowing water.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
Luckily, there is yet another form of streamed content, one which may be compared to flowing water.

Well, it's a bit like that.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
Interview with Joss on Salon.com.

Note that you may have to click through an ad to get to the article.
 
Posted by Achilles (Member # 7741) on :
 
Tonight!!!!
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
Should be good. My wife and I WERE going to see Coraline tonight, but we put it off until tomorrow instead.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
I happened to wear my "Joss Whedon is my master now" shirt, forgetting that the show was showing tonight.

*Crosses Fingers*
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
I love that shirt, and have almost bought it several times.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
It's almost the geekiest thing I own, but then my younger brother had to go and get this "Jayne Hoodie" for me for Christmas.

Which, now that I think about it, is awesome. I could never buy it for myself. It's pretty pricey, and unbelievably geeky. But since it was a gift, I can wear it with pride and can put the ultimate blame on my brother.
 
Posted by Achilles (Member # 7741) on :
 
I expect you all to debate small plot points from air-time tonight until I get back on Tuesday so I can read it.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
Well. My first impressions are that I like it a lot.

Chris, I liked your review, and agree with pretty much everything you say. I want to watch the episode again because it is clear that there's a lot in the background that hasn't been reveled, but a lot of hints and suggestions were dropped.

I haven't watched a television show live since...2004? For years now I've been playing catch up with Star Trek, Scrubs, Babylon 5, Firefly, The Office, Red Dwarf, Arrested Development, Buffy, and now Angel all on DVD, after (sometimes well after) the original show first aired.

So it's somewhat upsetting that I can't push the menu button on my remote and immediately start the next Dollhouse episode.

The twists were good, the turns were good, the characters look interesting so far, or at least some potential to be good characters. Eliza still has overtones of Faith, I think I remember hearing her voice crack in a very Faith sort of way, but I'm glad to see her again.

Is it next week yet?

[ February 13, 2009, 10:38 PM: Message edited by: The White Whale ]
 
Posted by Joldo (Member # 6991) on :
 
Hubba hubba.

I give it . . . seven episodes? I spend most of the first episode evaluating whether I would have been drawn in if I hadn't already been anticipating it and known what it was about. So far, I'm unsure.
 
Posted by scifibum (Member # 7625) on :
 
One of the local TV columnists felt it was a little weak. He hasn't written it off yet but he's not feeling optimistic either.

To be honest aside from eye candy I can't see much to recommend the concept at all. It seems dumb. Any ethical questions it raises are answered by "duh".

But I haven't watched it yet.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by scifibum:
It seems dumb...But I haven't watched it yet.

Um, yeah. Watch it first.
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
Mixed at best. I hope it gets better, but it does seem to be starting slow.
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
I was afraid someone was going to kill her minder, since he was all nice and honorable. I still think Joss Whedon will end up killing her minder.

Overall, though, I agree it didn't start out strong, but Joss Whedon's shows don't, so I'm set to love it within the next few episodes. I was totally thrown by the credits - does it even count as a Joss Whedon show if they don't show everyone's faces in the credits?

Also, not enough Amy Acker.

Edit to add: How come nobody ever uses an inhaler correctly on TV?

[ February 13, 2009, 11:54 PM: Message edited by: Fyfe ]
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
Well it looks like it's going to be on Hulu, at least:

http://www.hulu.com/dollhouse

With that, BSG and T:SCC airing at midnight, I'm never sleeping on Friday nights ever again.
 
Posted by Vadon (Member # 4561) on :
 
It was decent and, I think, worth giving a couple more episodes to see if it picks up. I'm putting my trust in Joss when he says things really get good about six or so episodes in.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The White Whale:
It's almost the geekiest thing I own, but then my younger brother had to go and get this "Jayne Hoodie" for me for Christmas.

Which, now that I think about it, is awesome. I could never buy it for myself. It's pretty pricey, and unbelievably geeky. But since it was a gift, I can wear it with pride and can put the ultimate blame on my brother.

I own a Jayne hoodie knitted for me by a Hatracker for the party we had at Serenity opening night.
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
The only hope I had for the show was to see Tahmoh Penikett shirtless.

Imagine my glee when the first shot of him is both shirtless and sweaty - and he looks fantastic.

*fans self*

Oh, was there a show around that? Beats me. [Wink]
 
Posted by Elmer's Glue (Member # 9313) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Fyfe:
How come nobody ever uses an inhaler correctly on TV?

That's what I thought. I mean come on, it's not breath spray!

I liked the show alright. Not loving it yet, but I'll keep watching.
 
Posted by pooka (Member # 5003) on :
 
My husband didn't pick up on the inhaler, but I noticed that her supposed near-sighted spectacles made her eyes larger, which is bass ackwards. It was only apparent in one scene.

I don't know. We may wind up watching it just because it's right after terminator, but it was kind of jarring for me. The review I had read said it was humorless, and I don't inherently mind humorless. I don't know. If I was going to pick two lives out of Firefly to fuse into a new series, it wouldn't be River and Inarra, which is kind of what this is.

I was also more confused than I wanted to be by the final scene. "ooh, I know you're going to buy my chicken!" So it doesn't matter if I give you half a chapter that only makes sense if you watch the teaser for next week.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
It won't be humorless. The first episode was focused on introducing the world and characters and setting a tone, but future episodes will mix things up much more.
 
Posted by Synesthesia (Member # 4774) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Elmer's Glue:
quote:
Originally posted by Fyfe:
How come nobody ever uses an inhaler correctly on TV?

That's what I thought. I mean come on, it's not breath spray!

I liked the show alright. Not loving it yet, but I'll keep watching.

This is true... I use one sometimes and you have to shake it and take two puffs after holding your breath between them.
I think that would take too long to show on television or in the movies so they just go puff and leave it at that.

The show was not so bad. It was interesting.
 
Posted by Ron Lambert (Member # 2872) on :
 
I don't get what the advantage is of giving people personality implants (aside from those who really need it). What makes it worth the trouble? You need a hostage negotiator? They are already available. Why create one artificially?

You know, this matter of personality implants is not that far removed from the way the Jason Bourne identity was supposedly created, in a CIA (or equivalent) brainwashing lab. It is supposed to have long been possible to create artificially new personalities, which then functionally produce multiple personality disorders.
 
Posted by Leonide (Member # 4157) on :
 
A normal hostage negotiator would have to be contacted through law enforcement channels, while this one was for hire through a clandestine organization.

I guess the point is that rich people can get the kind of people they require (a girlfriend-for-hire, a hostage negotiator, a swat-ish assassin type) without having to worry about legality. This is also presumably why that Boxing Guy is after them.
 
Posted by Ron Lambert (Member # 2872) on :
 
Instead of "Dollhouse," they should call it "Treadstone."
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
It wasn't bad.

But, then again, as far as I'm concerned they could film Eliza Dushku staring blankly in to space for an hour and I'd still watch it. [Smile]
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I actually don't really like the actress. I didn't see Buffy so I don't know what she was like there, but here she A) didn't quite pull of the "suddenly a completely different person" thing, B) don't know exactly why but she just doesn't strike me as that attractive, so the whole "ga ga eye candy" angle isn't working for me.
 
Posted by TL (Member # 8124) on :
 
The music was totally insufferable. The show was disappointing.

Oh, oh, how I hated the music. It was bothersome and constant and unmelodic and it never seemed to match what was happening. Just a series of slow atmospheric tones.

Despicable!

It was exactly the worst kind of television music. My idea of good television music can be found in shows like Twin Peaks, Battlestar Galactica, The X-Files, Firefly, Batman: The Animated Series -- and on and on. There are melodies, there are themes, there are repeating motifs. The music is appropriate to the scene. Often, no music is present. For the love of God, we don't need some dude in a studio with a synthesizer playing an F-sharp over every. freaking. conversation.
 
Posted by Speed (Member # 5162) on :
 
I guess I'm in the minority, but I'm going to come down in favor of the show. As far as pilots go, I didn't like it quite as much as Firefly, but quite a bit more than Buffy or Angel. It was well paced and imaginative. The plot was typical Whedon--unconventional yet satisfying, with a fully contained story and just enough mysterious loose ends to suck me into the series arc.

I'm not a big fan of Dushku, here or in Buffy. I was never fully behind Sarah Michelle Gellar or David Boreanaz as series leads either. But whatever Whedon lacks in casting skills (or, more fairly, where his tastes in actors differ from mine), he's always been able to more than compensate for in every other aspect of his productions.

I'm excited to see the series continue. On one hand, his series always gain steam as they progress. On the other hand, my favorite episodes are always the ones that he writes and directs himself. The pilot was full of cracking Whedon dialogue, and I'm sure I'll miss that next week when the staff writers take over. But I still can't wait to see where he's taking us.
 
Posted by TheGrimace (Member # 9178) on :
 
I'm with Speed on this one, I was enthralled by the episode and Joss's ability to cram so much into an episode and not feel rushed. I'll admit that I was super psyched to see this, but the only thing I wasn't particularly a fan of (though it didn't detract for me) was the bike scene at the beginning...

Come on, lots of characters all with obviously different motivations and thoughts on being involved in this all, interesting moral quandries involved, questions on where the technology will lead, etc etc etc...

I also think that the pacing and acting and music play a great role in setting the mood. It can be somewhat frantic out in the real world, but when you're in the dollhouse everything is muted and plodding and hushed, as in a dream world.

The hot girl factor definitely helps as well, but I don't think it was critical per-se.
 
Posted by Shanna (Member # 7900) on :
 
So I totally missed the premiere because I got a chance to see REPO again and hang out until 5am in the French Quarter with Terrance Zdunich. Sorry Joss!

Anyway, so I just watched it and I'm...meh. I wasn't really excited about the premise. A high school girl who kills vampires, that's new. A western space opera, that's different. But between Jason Bourne and Alias, it feels like I've seen this before.

I like Eliza but its okay that I don't love her. I rarely love Joss' leads. I think his strength is his ability to put together an ensemble and to present secondary characters that are just as intriguing and well-developed. And that's where I worry. If you had told me this was written by his staff, I would have believed it. It lacked his humor and I didn't fall in love with any of the cast.

There's potential but it just didn't feel like a Joss show to me. Usually his dialogue and ideas make his material very recognizable but I totally would have passed on this show if someone had shown me the pilot without his name attached. The concept seems gimmicky and very close to the typical eye candy, action genre of television.

Maybe it'll be interesting to see him and his staff take something boring and give it a new spin. But I'm nervous.
 
Posted by The Pixiest (Member # 1863) on :
 
I'm giving it time. Everything I read said it starts slow.

I didn't like the idea behind firefly either and that's one of my favorite shows ever. Maybe Dollhouse won't be a procedural forever...
 
Posted by Scott R (Member # 567) on :
 
Hm...not only did it start slow, but none of the dialog had Whedon's...sparkliness. It was standard, TV-action-genre blab.

The show lacks quirkiness.

I'd be curious to see how much editing the network did.

I'll stick with it, only because Joss' name is stuck on it. I'm giving it three episodes.
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
I'm with Scott on this one. It did start a bit slow, with rather too many backstory scenes. I felt it could have been streamlined a little more, although whoever said a lot occurred was right.

I think that this show would have been better in the hands of a newcomer rather than Dushku. I feel like even though Whedon practically wrote the role for Dushku, somewhere along the line it slipped from her into someone else, and it would have been a better choice to get someone bringing something entirely new to the role.

For example, the line "Who looks after you?" was quintessentially Whedon but it didn't quite ring true coming out of Dushku. She doesn't quite convey the right kind of empty dreaminess.

Whedon has never truly pulled off a perfect pilot along the lines of Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip. His strength is that he can weave good stories and good characters. And I did like the characters, although I felt that all of them seemed not quite themselves. Perhaps that is due to it being early in the show-- many shows lack centered characters at the beginning. But Whedon has generally been pretty good at getting characters right first time, and I didn't get that from this episode. Echo's disjointed life makes it difficult to pull her together, perhaps, but the other major characters, her handler (the one with the ex-cop heroics) and the scientist, seemed to lack a sense of who they were and this made the whole thing seem a little blah. They seemed to lack the personal details that make characters really work.

This episode lacked humour. I did not notice the lack, but I think that a lot of the character details in Whedon scripts emerge out of the humour that he writes for them. Because these characters were never funny, they lacked character.

This is think was especially problematic given the personality-lessness of the main character. I think that Echo needed an anchor-- and object, a manner of being, that visibly couldn't be 'edited' out of her. Alternatively, she could have had some anchor in the way her handler, for example, treats her: some exchange of dialogue that he is setting up for her in this first episode that will give him something to bounce off.

From a non-writing POV: I found the set of the actual Dollhouse bothersome. Why do they sleep in little boxes arranged in such an inefficient way? Why not have standard bunks?

I think overall I wanted more reality. By that I don't mean gritty darkness, I mean little things that make the world and the characters real. These can be character details, detailed dialogue or practical thought behind each set instead 'bedroom', 'broken down cabin', 'futuristic living space'.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Teshi:
I think that this show would have been better in the hands of a newcomer rather than Dushku.

I agree that Dushku wasn't a good choice for the role; I don't think that she has the range necessary to play the character (although maybe she'll develop it. Actors can improve). However, if I'm remembering correctly, it was her that FOX had the deal with, rather than Joss. It was Dushku that brought Wheadon on board. Chris, am I right on that one?


quote:
the other major characters, her handler (the one with the ex-cop heroics) and the scientist, seemed to lack a sense of who they were and this made the whole thing seem a little blah. They seemed to lack the personal details that make characters really work.
Agreed. None of them felt to me like they had lives that extended beyond their roles in the show, or for that matter beyond the moments they were on-screen.


quote:
From a non-writing POV: I found the set of the actual Dollhouse bothersome. Why do they sleep in little boxes arranged in such an inefficient way? Why not have standard bunks?
Yeah, that bugged the crap out of me. I actually said "yeah, right" aloud when I saw it. The shower setup didn't seem especially plausible either, and I didn't really buy that the lab where the memory wipes take place was so easily accessible to anybody who happened to be wandering around.

quote:
I think overall I wanted more reality. By that I don't mean gritty darkness, I mean little things that make the world and the characters real. These can be character details, detailed dialogue or practical thought behind each set instead 'bedroom', 'broken down cabin', 'futuristic living space'.
Yeah. In terms of set design, One of the things I loved about Firefly was how much thought went into the layout of the ship. I was utterly delighted in the first episode by the pull-out urnial and sink (and how very little water came out of the faucet) in Mal's quarters, for example. In this show it didn't feel like the same thought had gone into the set design. Or character design. Or anything, really. I'm hopeful that the show will gain a feeling of depth as it progresses.
 
Posted by scholarette (Member # 11540) on :
 
I have read that there was a lot of network demands that Josh went with. I am hoping that explains the pilot and as we get in, it will get better. I am actually willing to give it 4-5 episodes before saying no.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
Unless it just becomes egregiously horrible (and as long as the episodes are made available on Hulu), I'll give it a season.
 
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
 
Same here.

I sat through season 1 of Buffy (all on hulu), and really didn't enjoy most of it.
 
Posted by Leonide (Member # 4157) on :
 
quote:
I think that Echo needed an anchor--
We should call it a "constant" instead and then there can be a ludicrous Lost/Dollhouse crossover in the season finale!
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by El JT de Spang:
Same here.

I sat through season 1 of Buffy (all on hulu), and really didn't enjoy most of it.

I didn't hate the first season of Buffy, but it got so much better in the following seasons. And the same with Angel (although to a lesser degree) I'm on the third season now and I care more about the characters and enjoy the episodes much more than the first season. As for Firefly, the first season, being the only season in an awesome series, made it an awesome season. I still tear up when I think of what possible future seasons of Firefly could have been like, given Joss's trend of ever-increasing seasonal quality.

So I'm actually willing to give Dollhouse at least one season and a few episodes, as long at there is clear potential throughout.
 
Posted by The Pixiest (Member # 1863) on :
 
Did anyone else think the Dollhouse was just the offices of Wolfram and Hart with a different paint job?
 
Posted by Achilles (Member # 7741) on :
 
*raises hand*
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Pixiest:
Did anyone else think the Dollhouse was just the offices of Wolfram and Hart with a different paint job?

No, not really.

What parts? The inside? No. The outside? I don't think so.
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
I know what you mean though! Has to be the same designer.
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
I read something about that, and it was the same designer.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
Hmmm...I'll have to watch it again.
 
Posted by Mrs.M (Member # 2943) on :
 
I think what Eliza Dushku particularly needs is voice coaching. Her voice itself is a little bit harsh and the only way she seems to act with it is to change the volume.

I like those bed things. Maybe it's a new mom of twins thing, but they looked so comfortable and peaceful.
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
Actually, I didn't read it, Joss said it during one of the joint interviews they had with him and Eliza Dushku.

I like her husky, bedroom voice. [Wink]
 
Posted by Shigosei (Member # 3831) on :
 
I figured out a possible reason for the odd bedroom system. They could be overlooked if the dollhouse were raided at night, thus protecting the actives from capture.
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
It's still an inefficient way of storing them.
 
Posted by Alcon (Member # 6645) on :
 
I liked it. It fell a little flat, but Whedon's pilots always do. I think Dushku can grow into the role. I liked her handler, I liked seeing Helo return in a new character, I liked the owners of the Dollhouse. I liked how they were convinced and how they could easily go either way -- good guy or bad guy. I liked the tech, though he reminded me disturbingly of Warren from Buffy (I don't think it was the same actor). I'll give it a season, doesn't hurt and it might be good.

The people saying Whedon's traditional ironic human is missing are right though. It was almost completely lacking. Again, it often is lacking from his pilots though.
 
Posted by Vadon (Member # 4561) on :
 
Very Condensed Opinion:

I think that episode went better than the pilot. It's still not great, but I'm starting to feel intrigued. (Something I wasn't feeling from the pilot)

I'll keep watching.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
How soon after shows air do they go up on Hulu, typically?
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
I think it varies from show to show. For BSG, I know they've been putting them up pretty close to midnight after they aired, but that was only for the first five episodes of the last half of this season. The last five won't appear on there until after 8 days have gone by.
 
Posted by Leonide (Member # 4157) on :
 
I think this episode was marginally more intriguing, but i'm still annoyed with the narrative tactics, the process of revealing the story, and the character development. and the dialogue is still CLUNKY!
 
Posted by Sala (Member # 8980) on :
 
Did anyone else have their signal disappear toward the end of the episode? I don't know what happened from the point Echo's handler got shot. Can someone tell me what happened? (Put up a spoiler warning for those who didn't see.)
~Sala
 
Posted by ladyday (Member # 1069) on :
 
SPOILERS
TwP recaplet

Boyd is shot in the side and losing large amounts of blood. They stand out in the open for some time, having a drawn out conversation, instead of hiding (???) but what's important here is that Boyd told Echo the trigger words (everything is going to be alright) and she doesn't respond the way she's supposed to (now that you're here). Instead, she points out the obvious, then goes to kill the bad guy, despite Boyd's protests that she doesn't have the right imprint, oops I mean training. She looks confused for a second (more confused than usual) but shoots back by asking Boyd if he trusts her. He says 'with my life'. Echo finds the bad guy and eventually stabs him to death with his own arrow, after some trash talk and a fight.

Back at the dollhouse, Echo's imprint and memories are wiped. She encounters Laurence on her way out, and he says some kind of mean/stupid things to her, about putting her in the attic and such, which she responds to with a blank stare and an announcement that she is going to go swimming in the pool now. Then, when his back is turned, she makes the grabbing shoulder gesture that she learned on her mission. Dun dun dun...

In the Dr's office, Doc and Boyd chat over the dead body of the fake ranger. Boyd explains that he didn't intend for the ranger to die, and Doc points out that he missed the major arteries when he shot the ranger in the leg. They both observe how the ranger really died - knife wounds, exactly like Alpha's other victims. Doc states that this is impossible because Alpha was hunted down and killed, but Boyd argues that the people in charge probably lied about that.

Speaking of people in charge, Adelle rants to Lawrence about the fact that their background checks are worthless if they don't catch things like 'raging psychopath'. Lawrence explains that the bad guy's entire background, from birth on up, was completely fabricated, and they've never seen something this involved.

I didn't get the order of events right, but that's basically what happened.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
This episode started to remind me of Red vs Blue, Reconstruction. Partly just because they use the word "Alpha" but the context seemed fairly similar as well, with all these fragments of artificial personalities getting chucked around. I assume Alpha is a composite of several personalities that went haywire.

quote:
Originally posted by Sala:
Did anyone else have their signal disappear toward the end of the episode? I don't know what happened from the point Echo's handler got shot. Can someone tell me what happened? (Put up a spoiler warning for those who didn't see.)
~Sala

You can watch episodes on both Hulu.com and Fox.com the day after. (I think they go up at 5 AM)

"I have four brothers. None of them are democrats."

Made me laugh.

[ February 21, 2009, 01:55 PM: Message edited by: Raymond Arnold ]
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Alcon:
... I liked seeing Helo return in a new character...

Really? Because we were pretty sure it was still Helo, just in a suit. No new character there. [Smile]

I think we're just going to keep watching it for now - but when it goes up against the BSG finale, well, priorities will rule.
 
Posted by Leonide (Member # 4157) on :
 
Alpha, Echo? Where are Bravo, Charlie, and Delta?

edit: ooh, and I forgot about Sierra! My theory is confirmed! [Smile]
 
Posted by the_Somalian (Member # 6688) on :
 
Lasagna Girl is an Active.
 
Posted by Sala (Member # 8980) on :
 
Ladyday and Raymond, Thanks!!!!! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Leonide:
Alpha, Echo? Where are Bravo, Charlie, and Delta?

edit: ooh, and I forgot about Sierra! My theory is confirmed! [Smile]

I thought from the first time they called her 'Echo' it was supposed to be obvious the Actives had military codenames.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I had assumed Echo was intended to showcase her "echoing" various personalities and that Alpha was just the first one (still experimental).
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by El JT de Spang:
quote:
Originally posted by Leonide:
Alpha, Echo? Where are Bravo, Charlie, and Delta?

edit: ooh, and I forgot about Sierra! My theory is confirmed! [Smile]

I thought from the first time they called her 'Echo' it was supposed to be obvious the Actives had military codenames.
Want confirmation? Go to the source... IMDB:

quote:
All of the names of the girls used in the Dollhouse are named after the NATO phonetic alphabet (Echo, Sierra).

 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
"Exuberant price"? I think she meant "exorbinant".

And Nighthawk, those comments on IMdb are hardly a reliable source. They're about the same as someone here saying so. But it's clearly true. And I think we'll find that except for Echo and Alpha, most of the Actives are near the end of the alphabet, because Alpha killed the early ones.
 
Posted by TheGrimace (Member # 9178) on :
 
I thought it was an ok episode, and I appreciated the background info that I'm sure will lead somewhere fascinating. I will say that this episode struck me more than the first as lacking the magic that I expect from Joss. It wasn't bad, it just didn't seem fantastic [Frown] Also, I just kept having flashbacks to the old Fantasy Island episode with the hunting of humans... I guess it's hard to do much terribly different with such an iconic topic.

As for Exuberant, exorbitant would have made more sense, but exuberant could work in this context, just with a somewhat odd feel to it.
 
Posted by Goody Scrivener (Member # 6742) on :
 
Jason Bourne... thank you to whoever mentioned him first. I was trying to recall what movie had the same general premise. I remembered The Pretender, I'd never seen Alias, but I knew there was something else out there that felt very similar with the whole imprinting thing.

I'm still reserving judgment. I watched the first two episodes back to back on Hulu and I'm not quite sure what's going on yet.
 
Posted by Scott R (Member # 567) on :
 
The second episode was worlds better than the pilot.

Whedon's series have always been ensemble affairs with quirky characters doing and saying quirky things in quirky settings. There's really none of that in Dollhouse; the only quirky person is the neuro-technician or whatever; and Echo cannot be said to even have a personality of her own.
 
Posted by The Pixiest (Member # 1863) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Scott R:
The second episode was worlds better than the pilot.

Agreed! In spades!

quote:

and Echo cannot be said to even have a personality of her own.

Yet.
 
Posted by Jeorge (Member # 11524) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Pixiest:

quote:

and Echo cannot be said to even have a personality of her own.

Yet.
Agreed. I think we'll see more and more that she has fleeting memories of things she shouldn't remember, and along with those memories we'll start to see a single personality (which is her own personality) breaking through, trying to decipher what's happening.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
Is it just me or in one of the scenes where she gets wiped, there's a brief shot, if I remember, from the POV of a baby being lifted out of a crib by (I assume) a mother. I think that was in the second episode.

That seems to me like a nice little, brief, hint to some of the problems (and plot developments) that might develop later in the series.

Can any one second my memory?
 
Posted by Achilles (Member # 7741) on :
 
Nope. You must've been wiped.
 
Posted by Darth_Mauve (Member # 4709) on :
 
Plot Conspiracy Theory #Q.

Everyone except Neuro-Tech is an active.

Boss Lady--Active who is created to be the best Boss Lady.

Lead Security--Active who is created to be the best in security.

FBI Agent mindlessly chasing them--is an Active.

Echo's Handler--is an active.

etc. etc.

My only proof--Two most important people in the place are having a high level discussion in expensive suits, and Neuro-Tech guy interrupts them, and they don't question him. He gets to dress casual, and seems to be the only one who touches the equipment. Even when Alpha went on a slice and dice spree--he couldn't touch Neuro-Tech guy. That's because of conditioning #1 commandment--thou shall not hurt Neuro-Tech guy.
 
Posted by Shigosei (Member # 3831) on :
 
quote:
Is it just me or in one of the scenes where she gets wiped, there's a brief shot, if I remember, from the POV of a baby being lifted out of a crib by (I assume) a mother. I think that was in the second episode.

That seems to me like a nice little, brief, hint to some of the problems (and plot developments) that might develop later in the series.

Can any one second my memory?

I caught that during the very first wipe that they showed. I had thought that this was the first time they wiped her memory, but it might be due to them using complete personalities -- maybe the baby memory was from the imprint.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
Dan, I love that theory. If that's what Joss has done it's a little Blade Runnerish, but I think that Philip K Dick would approve.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
Even when Alpha went on a slice and dice spree--he couldn't touch Neuro-Tech guy.
Neuro-Tech Guy didn't seem too confident, and kept asking for a gun of his own.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
quote:
Neuro-Tech Guy didn't seem too confident, and kept asking for a gun of his own.
If everyone else is storming through with weapons, and making no apparent effort to protect me or get me to safety, damn straight I'd want a weapon too.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
Not if you don't feel that you're in any danger from the threat.
 
Posted by Vadon (Member # 4561) on :
 
Could be that Alpha went hay-wire to the point that even tech-guy was afraid. Ultimately the conditioning worked, but you could understand him thinking it might not work so well for him.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
Yeah. When the robot is blatantly disregarding laws 2 and 3, law #1 doesn't seem so secure anymore.
 
Posted by The Pixiest (Member # 1863) on :
 
As an aside... Amy Acker is still beautiful even with scars.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
*nod*

And water is still wet. [Wink]
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Nighthawk:
quote:
Neuro-Tech Guy didn't seem too confident, and kept asking for a gun of his own.
If everyone else is storming through with weapons, and making no apparent effort to protect me or get me to safety, damn straight I'd want a weapon too.
More damning to the theory, though, is the fact that he wasn't given one after voicing his request the first time.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Maybe the Neuro-Tech is a Cylon ...
 
Posted by Darth_Mauve (Member # 4709) on :
 
Mucus wins the thread.
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
quote:
My only proof--Two most important people in the place are having a high level discussion in expensive suits, and Neuro-Tech guy interrupts them, and they don't question him. He gets to dress casual, and seems to be the only one who touches the equipment. Even when Alpha went on a slice and dice spree--he couldn't touch Neuro-Tech guy. That's because of conditioning #1 commandment--thou shall not hurt Neuro-Tech guy.
As much as I like your theory, this could simply be explained as 1) urgent situation 2) it's his technology. For all his youthful appearance, he's obviously their equal in importance.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
I get the feeling Topher is the Wash of Dollhouse.
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Darth_Mauve:
Plot Conspiracy Theory #Q.

Everyone except Neuro-Tech is an active.

Boss Lady--Active who is created to be the best Boss Lady.

Lead Security--Active who is created to be the best in security.

FBI Agent mindlessly chasing them--is an Active.

Echo's Handler--is an active.

etc. etc.

My only proof--Two most important people in the place are having a high level discussion in expensive suits, and Neuro-Tech guy interrupts them, and they don't question him. He gets to dress casual, and seems to be the only one who touches the equipment. Even when Alpha went on a slice and dice spree--he couldn't touch Neuro-Tech guy. That's because of conditioning #1 commandment--thou shall not hurt Neuro-Tech guy.

This is an interview with a certain actor in the series, and this actor says something that (I think) hints at a plot development you just speculated about.
 
Posted by Luet13 (Member # 9274) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The White Whale:
I get the feeling Topher is the Wash of Dollhouse.

My thoughts exactly.
 
Posted by Jeorge (Member # 11524) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The White Whale:
I get the feeling Topher is the Wash of Dollhouse.

Now, see, a week ago that comment would have made no sense to me. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
 
A week ago I made that comment elsewhere.
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
For damn sure Wash is not going to be the Wash of this series.
 
Posted by Shanna (Member # 7900) on :
 
Wow! That is an interesting casting choice. Very unexpected but I can totally see him pulling it off.
 
Posted by Shigosei (Member # 3831) on :
 
Speaking of Firefly actors, it was good to see Badger again.
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Shigosei:
Speaking of Firefly actors, it was good to see Badger again.

Too bad he couldn't hide his accent!
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by El JT de Spang:
A week ago I made that comment elsewhere.

Okay, but I wasn't comfortable with the choice until the second episode. Now it's obvious, and I'm okay with it.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Shigosei:
Speaking of Firefly actors, it was good to see Badger again.

Have you been watching BSG? He was in an episode just a few weeks ago.
 
Posted by Sterling (Member # 8096) on :
 
Am I bad that I think episode 2 is awfully early to be recycling "The Most Dangerous Game"?...
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
Yes.

How you're able to look yourself in the mirror after thinking that, I'll never understand.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
Well, he can't, clearly because he's a vampire. Don't rub salt in the wound.

[Big Grin]
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
Or garlic.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
Holy...water we going to do if somebody does go at him with garlic?
 
Posted by The Pixiest (Member # 1863) on :
 
I have no stake in this pun fight.
 
Posted by Sterling (Member # 8096) on :
 
Here comes the sun, and I say... AIIIGHHHH! *FWOOSH*
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
Y'all slay me.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
I'm relieved that you think it's funny, Lisa--I was worried you'd be cross.
 
Posted by Scott R (Member # 567) on :
 
Puns suck.
 
Posted by Achilles (Member # 7741) on :
 
*runs away smoking*
 
Posted by Shigosei (Member # 3831) on :
 
Yeah, I guess he was just in BSG again. Which is also amusing, given that it's Helo he's talking to.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
Scott: bite me.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
Porter, I just want to say that I really appreciate your being so vocal about the fact that you're not happy about Scott's attitude in this thread. With regard to policing his actions, you're really in the van. Hell, sing your protests and they wouldn't be any clearer or more ringing than they are now.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
(That one took me a while.)
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
It was pretty tortured, I admit. I'm glad that I could count on you to take the time to parse it.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sterling:
Here comes the sun, and I say... AIIIGHHHH! *FWOOSH*

By the way, to give credit where credit is due, I laughed aloud when I read this.
 
Posted by Darth_Mauve (Member # 4709) on :
 
quote:
I get the feeling Topher is the Wash of Dollhouse.
Oh never.

Wash was a technician, but had an innocence and a zen that was very powerful. His wife was the one that carried the gun. He wouldn't hurt a fly.

Besides, it was the story of Rugged Individualism VS State Sponsored Control.

Topher is more than willing to carry a gun. He has no moral center--one of the most sociopathic characters on TV.

Besides, it is the story of the dangers of science dehumanizing man, and he is the literal dehumanizer.

Wash brought a humanity to Sereity, the ship.
Topher takes the humanity of Echo, the person.

Not the same.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Noemon:
It was pretty tortured, I admit. I'm glad that I could count on you to take the time to parse it.

It reminded me of a previous construction of yours where we learned that the Thick Cheesy always discharges its debts.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
I was thinking more along the lines of the blonde guy with snazzy outfits who likes to make comedic one-liners and has a odd mix of childlike humor and a mature comprehension of the seriousness of his situation. And I imagine an interesting part of Dollhouse will be how Topher develops a moral center. The whole thing with Alpha clearly shows that he doesn't have the control he pretends to, and at some point he'll have to deal with that.

In the meantime, he'll make jokes and make me laugh.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
Snazzy outfits? Wash wore a flight suit with Hawaiian shirts over them.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mr_porteiro_head:
quote:
Originally posted by Noemon:
It was pretty tortured, I admit. I'm glad that I could count on you to take the time to parse it.

It reminded me of a previous construction of yours where we learned that the Thick Cheesy always discharges its debts.
:: laugh :: I'd forgotten about that.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
It haunts me to this day.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
:D
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
eesh. New Yorker absolutely brutalized this show with their initial review.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
Link?
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/television/2009/03/02/090302crte_television_franklin?currentPage=1

quote:
Now, with “Dollhouse,” Whedon is back on Fox, and the second time is probably not the charm. Only people who are willing to cut Whedon endless slack could find anything much to draw them in to this show, at least in the three episodes I’ve seen. So far, the vision, humor, and storytelling skill you’d expect to find are absent, and at the core of the series is an unpromising performance by Eliza Dushku (from “Buffy” and “Angel”).
quote:
the primary qualification that Dushku brings to the part is that she graduated with honors from the Royal Academy of Cleavage. In terms of gender studies, it is notable that Dushku’s demeanor as a zombie is much the same as the demeanor many actresses her age resort to when trying to project an image of themselves as unthreatening and “feminine”: a slouchy walk, a bobbly head, and ever-parted lips. Would someone please show these actresses a movie starring Katharine Hepburn, Barbara Stanwyck, Irene Dunne, Bette Davis, Cate Blanchett, Meryl Streep, or Judy Davis? Whedon wants to explore the farthest corners of our natures to discover what it means to be human. But this vehicle, which he created specifically for Dushku, doesn’t seem fit for the journey.

 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
Thanks!

And...ouch.
 
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
 
I personally love bad reviews. All they do is drum up interest while simultaneously setting the bar low. Thank you, New Yorker!
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
Oh, and JT's music sucks!
 
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
 
Preach it, brother!
 
Posted by Scott R (Member # 567) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mr_porteiro_head:
Scott: bite me.

Well, how old are you?
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
He prefers his meat unblemished by puberty. Or even a birthday.
 
Posted by Achilles (Member # 7741) on :
 
quote:
...the vision, humor, and storytelling skill you’d expect to find are absent....
Much as I find in the New Yorker. [Wink]
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
Hooray, more Amy Acker tonight! I liked it when Topher said she and Boyd could get married and have scowly babies.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Fyfe:
For damn sure Wash is not going to be the Wash of this series.

So he turned in to a Reaver.

"I am like a leaf in the..." *** STAB! SLICE! EVISCERATE! STAB! ***

[ February 28, 2009, 12:53 AM: Message edited by: Nighthawk ]
 
Posted by Corwin (Member # 5705) on :
 
Well, I still like it, despite the fact that the music of the last episode is not really my type. [Big Grin]

So, in the end, Echo and Sierra were still remembering something, weren't they? I guess the genius isn't that much of a genius...
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
Yeah, I think Topher is still a genius, but even he's in over his head.

I didn't really like the plot, with divas and arrogant singers and obsessive fans, but I'm happy that the show shifts from theme to theme. I hope never to see those singers / dancers again.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I liked this episode quite a bit. It's not what I expected from a Joss show but it's good for its own reasons.
 
Posted by TL (Member # 8124) on :
 
After having seen, presumably, the same three episodes that The New Yorker saw, I'm having a hard time imagining why anyone would take issue with that review. I'm as big a Whedon fan as anyone. The show so far is not a good show. I think we all expect it to get better, but if it wasn't Joss, I would not be watching.
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
Yesterday's episode was a train wreck.

Who was that actress playing the singer? Was she some American Idol winner they felt they had to give a role to or something? In any case, she was dreadful--as was the story, which made no sense. How could her stalker freely operate backstage like that? Didn't the writers realize that sending in TWO actives--and it turning out that one of them was so useless that she let's herself get kidnapped and be absolutely cowed by her captor--would be clunky storytelling? The pitch we keep hearing from Whedon is that the first episodes are just an introduction. But why was "Firefly" a masterpiece and this clearly isn't?

So far, Dollhouse has been remarkably lame, and this could be because Whedon is afraid of pouring his heart into another show that may very well get cancelled before its time.

[ February 28, 2009, 06:55 PM: Message edited by: Clive Candy ]
 
Posted by Elmer's Glue (Member # 9313) on :
 
Yeah, why was the second active completely useless? She should have taken the guy out as soon as he attacked her.
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
The problem with this show is that the "engagements" get in the way of what everyone wants: suspense and intrigue within the Dollhouse itself. There was almost a good moment involving Amy Acker's character and Echo's handler (the most believable actor in the series, IMHO.)
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
On the other hand, Sierra as Audra was mighty cute.

I thought the singer was an absolutely dreadful actress - they should have given her fewer lines, and left most of her serious psychological issues implied, rather than hammered to death. As with previous episodes, I thought the main plotline was less interesting than everything happening on the periphery. "What happened to the previous Sierra?"; Victor turning out to be an Active; that excellent moment at the end where Echo shakes her head at Sierra.

It's getting better, and I'm still giving it time. Buffy didn't hit its stride for a while either.

(How good was the FBI agent, though? He wins MVP for this week: gotta love a man who can count bullets effectively.)
 
Posted by Jeorge (Member # 11524) on :
 
It seems to me (from what I've seen of Whedon so far) that what he excels at is building interesting relationships between characters over time. But this show seems to be designed to keep him from doing that. Every week there will be a new set of characters that we probably won't see again. And the character relationships which will develop over time are only getting a few minutes every episode.
 
Posted by plaid (Member # 2393) on :
 
Eliza talks about Dollhouse at A.V. Club: link

quote:
we’ve now done 13 episodes, and people have said that the show took off once they finally realized that Joss is best off left alone to do his thing. That happens around episode six — six through 13 are just extraordinary. I love one, two, three, four, and five, but Joss’ first script that he did after the pilot is number six, which is called “Man On The Street,” and it is just unbelievable. From that point on, the world unfolds in Joss’ way, with Joss’ speed, and it’s really remarkable.

 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
Okay, I'm remaining hopeful.
 
Posted by Alcon (Member # 6645) on :
 
Ahh, that explains it. People getting in Joss' way. Alright, maybe we should stop watching -- or just hold our criticism -- until Joss gets control back at episode 6.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
quote:
I thought the singer was an absolutely dreadful actress
Really? I thought she did a fine job of portraying a whiny, self possessed teen idol. Which doesn't make the portrayal any less annoying, and probably didn't stretch the actresses' skills that much, but I didn't think there was anything objectively wrong with it.

I do agree the psychological issues were a little hammered.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Boone! Woo!
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Elmer's Glue:
Yeah, why was the second active completely useless? She should have taken the guy out as soon as he attacked her.

They did say she was for "extreme circumstances", but I don't think they get more extreme than that.

And Sierra's handler = useless.

At the end of the last episode, Echo nods a "no" to Sierra as they pass... What did *that* mean?
 
Posted by Corwin (Member # 5705) on :
 
From what I understand it meant that they both remember something from their imprints/pasts and realize that acting on it wouldn't be good. Why exactly not (meaning whether they realize they are sometimes being erased) I don't know.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Elmer's Glue:
Yeah, why was the second active completely useless? She should have taken the guy out as soon as he attacked her.

They said. She was only going to activate in case of emergency. Emergency for the client which Echo couldn't handle. That wasn't it.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Raymond Arnold:
quote:
I thought the singer was an absolutely dreadful actress
Really? I thought she did a fine job of portraying a whiny, self possessed teen idol. Which doesn't make the portrayal any less annoying, and probably didn't stretch the actresses' skills that much, but I didn't think there was anything objectively wrong with it.
Jaime Lee Kirchner, for anyone interested.
 
Posted by Leonide (Member # 4157) on :
 
I read the "nod" differently. I figured Echo remembered the Useless Handler saying "the last thing I need is for you to rub off on her" and so when she saw Sierra smile and start to walk over to her, she shook her head. I really don't think Sierra remembers anything.

All that Echo remembered from being hunted was the shoulder punch thing, so it makes a kind of sense for her to only remember one thing from this imprint.
 
Posted by Jeorge (Member # 11524) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Leonide:
All that Echo remembered from being hunted was the shoulder punch thing, so it makes a kind of sense for her to only remember one thing from this imprint.

I'm hoping that her "remembering" is going to spiral out of control fairly quickly - otherwise I think the REAL plot of this series is going to move along far too slowly.
 
Posted by Corwin (Member # 5705) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Leonide:
I really don't think Sierra remembers anything.

Why would she listen to Echo then? Just because she told her "no"? They all seemed pretty blank slates when they were inactive, understanding a head-shake to mean "no, don't come near me, there's danger" or something like that should be beyond Sierra's inactive state. At least that's what I think. [Smile]
 
Posted by Leonide (Member # 4157) on :
 
They are blank slates personality-wise, not in understanding. Sierra looked confused when Echo shook her head, but she understands what a head shake means, and since Echo didn't slow down, she kept walking as well.
 
Posted by FlyingCow (Member # 2150) on :
 
I'm wondering if Sierra's "emergency" job was to do exactly what she did, which was get taken hostage by the stalker.

When asked about the "last Sierra", who we must assume is dead, her handler said "she did her job". Maybe she was just there as a decoy to flush the stalker into the open.

They set her up pretty well as a target. "#1 Fan", putting her up on stage for everyone to see, having her be an easy mark, etc. If the stalker grabbed her, that would be protecting the client. Plus, as mentioned in Ep 2, if an active is damanged/dies, it's only a matter of extra fees for the client.
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
PA

quote:
Dollhouse is not an enjoyable television program.

It's true that I've used a hypertext reference to link the word "Dollhouse" directly to a place where you can watch the show, but you should not interpret this as a recommendation. Being truly granular about what makes the show an affront would require the use of holographic data storage, but in general terms the show (as delivered) doesn't work. There's plenty of people to hate, and very few people to like. It's a science fiction retelling of MTV's The Real World, and it works about as well as you would expect.

What we are told by people (almost without exception) is that

1. I don't like the show, but
2. I will keep watching it as an expression of gratitude for a better, more engaging program he made back when he was making better, more engaging programs

which as a system of thought doesn't work for me. His acolytes are breathless for the show to reach apotheosis, like some scheming cult awaiting a fortuitous celestial arrangement. It's core to their belief: it's even woven into the press tour, the idea that the show isn't bad because it's bad.

SA

quote:
I've been thinking a lot about feminism lately. Must be all the estrogen in the drinking water.

Whenever I start thinking like that my mind naturally ends up thinking about Joss Whedon. He's the self-described feminist behind shows like Buffy: The Vampire Slayer and Firefly.

His most recent effort, Dollhouse (Fox, Fridays at 9/8c), is about a very unusual escort service. Wealthy clients customize their dream dates to order. The Dollhouse programs personalities and skills into one of their "Actives" and sends them off on a fantasy date that never goes according to plan.

Eliza Dushku stars at the high-tech hooker Echo, mind-wiped for the pleasure of dudes around the globe. There are some other people on the show, like that black guy who looks sort of familiar and that guy from Battlestar Galactica who had a baby with a Cylon. No, the other guy.

Sexually menacing men punching, stabbing, shooting, or attempting rape on a hooker are a common theme of Dollhouse.

This is very empowering for women, because nothing says feminism quite like a brainwashed fantasy prostitute being punched and kicked in the face by a john.


 
Posted by Corwin (Member # 5705) on :
 
Heh, I don't get the second one... The point is exactly that the actives are very much "used" and it's not comfortable for everyone. I'd like to see someone hiring an active who has some issues with the whole process too, but I don't want everything to happen within the first three episodes. [Big Grin]

As for the "anti-feminism", Alpha was a male, right?!

And remember how one of Echo's assignments was to be a negotiator, while Sierra was a soldier? Yes, they were still being used; no, those were not "dates". Sheesh, if they're gonna critique a show the least they could do would be to remember what they watched... [Razz]
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
Well, they've only really shown us one male active, and he wasn't programmed to be all sexy.
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
quote:
I'm hoping that her "remembering" is going to spiral out of control fairly quickly - otherwise I think the REAL plot of this series is going to move along far too slowly.
I'm hoping it's not. I like the delicate "reflection" development of character. Unless the show is going to morph dramatically (not necessarily a bad thing) too quick modification will

quote:
His most recent effort, Dollhouse (Fox, Fridays at 9/8c), is about a very unusual escort service. Wealthy clients customize their dream dates to order. The Dollhouse programs personalities and skills into one of their "Actives" and sends them off on a fantasy date that never goes according to plan.
Obviously this person hasn't watched the show. I guess we've had two dates, one which ended well and the other which didn't.

As for why we haven't seen any male escorts-- even in real life male escorts are more uncommon than female escorts.

Lastly, the violence of men towards women is not anti-feminist unless the woman is depicted in an anti-feminist way. Buffy got beat up by male vampires all the time.

quote:
1. I don't like the show, but
2. I will keep watching it as an expression of gratitude for a better, more engaging program he made back when he was making better, more engaging programs

I don't like the show but I think it's better than some other sci fi shows around. I think it has sparks of poorly-delivered intelligence. For example, in the third episode they talk about how Echo is modifying the missions and completing them in a more complete fashion than intended. This was a surprise given the vapidity of the rest of the episode. In CSI: Miami this wouldn't happen.

This should have been delivered in a clearer fashion and lacking the bits I skipped through (fights, sexy dancing).

I find what I miss from the show is people who have the quirky kind of way of being that makes them seem like normal people. In Firefly, everyone was gorgeous but they all had personality that made them seem like real people. Kaylee was colourful and happy, Jayne was stupid and violent in an oddly endearing way etc.

In Dollhouse, the only character who has managed to make this work is Claire, the doctor. The actress has a non-standard presence-- her voice is softer, she is retiring. Everyone else-- the genius, the handler, the security guy and the head honcho are all playing their roles like they belong something much blander. Heck, even CSI Miami has the bizarre but somehow workable Horatio.

I think it's likely because it's not a proper ensemble cast. They talk to each other, but they're not on screen with each other. They only appear in twos and threes.

Finally, I think this reviewer makes a mistake in saying that we might watch this show because in the past Whedon has been good. We watch this show because we know that Whedon is good and has demonstrated his excellence right up to Dr. Horrible last summer. If it's not showing in this show we're willing to append "yet" and wait.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
quote:
If it's not showing in this show we're willing to append "yet" and wait.
Especially when we hear this:
quote:
we’ve now done 13 episodes, and people have said that the show took off once they finally realized that Joss is best off left alone to do his thing. That happens around episode six — six through 13 are just extraordinary. I love one, two, three, four, and five, but Joss’ first script that he did after the pilot is number six, which is called “Man On The Street,” and it is just unbelievable. From that point on, the world unfolds in Joss’ way, with Joss’ speed, and it’s really remarkable.

 
Posted by Abyss (Member # 3086) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lisa:
Well, they've only really shown us one male active, and he wasn't programmed to be all sexy.

Depends on what you're into, I suspect.
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Corwin:
Heh, I don't get the second one...

it's SA. to get it you have to remember: they are never serious.
 
Posted by Vadon (Member # 4561) on :
 
So... anyone see this last episode?
 
Posted by FlyingCow (Member # 2150) on :
 
It was interesting, but I'm still reserving judgement until after Joss gets taken off of Fox's leash.

These are the people who decided to show Firefly all out of order, after all. You can tell there's a heavy Fox hand on things (which is what is giving people the weird anti-feminist vibes, I think), and I'm waiting for it to hit its stride.

Still better than Heroes, and the most recent episode of 24.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I think the "anti-feminist-vibe" is there on purpose, to set up an initial position that can later be moved away from.
 
Posted by Maratanos (Member # 11918) on :
 
I post here about as often as "almost never", but I really think people are allowing 5 years and a great deal of nostalgia to cloud the actual reception of Firefly in 2003.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
Maratanos, that may be. I didn't find Firefly until after it was canceled and the DVD series was out. But I feel it's important to point out that the series was aired as follows:

9/20 - Second Episode
9/27 - Third Episode
10/4 - Sixth Episode
10/18 - Seventh Episode
10/25 - Eighth Episode
11/1 - Fourth Episode
11/8 - Fifth Episode
11/15 - Ninth Episode
12/6 - Tenth Episode
12/13/02 - Fourteenth Episode
12/20 - First Episode
NEVER - Eleventh Episode
NEVER - Twelfth Episode
NEVER - Thirteenth Episode

So how in the world could one expect to have a good reception of a show when it's delivered like that? And now contrast that to the reception when the DVD came out.

quote:
...released on region 1 DVD on December 9, 2003...by September 2005, its DVD release had sold approximately 500,000 copies
quote:
At Amazon.com the DVDs had average daily rankings of between 1st and 75th in 2003, 22nd and 397th in 2004, 2nd and 232nd in 2005, and 2nd and 31st in 2006 as of June 27, 2006.
( From Wikipedia - Firefly )
 
Posted by Bella Bee (Member # 7027) on :
 
quote:
Posts: 1
Not sure about the 'almost never' Maratanos, but welcome!

Yeah, the reception for Firefly was pretty dire, as were the reviews of it I read at the time.
But I saw about three episodes of its run on first airing and thought it had potential, so I was quite sad to see it go. (I was much more sad when I'd seen the whole series, though).

The other show I liked that year (2002) was 'Haunted' which was also cancelled after about four weeks. Then it was basically remade in France (different enough for there to be no plagiarism issue but obviously inspired by the same material) and cancelled after six episodes there too.

Now I just have to wait and see whether Dollhouse gets cancelled before I’ve even had a chance to watch it.

The moral? Clearly I have unusual taste in TV, and most people have none. [Wink]
 
Posted by Stephan (Member # 7549) on :
 
An article in today's Washington Post talks about how networks next season are going back to closed ended dramas and laugh track sitcoms. Critics don't like them, they don't develop cult followings, but they get higher ratings.
 
Posted by Puppy (Member # 6721) on :
 
Is 500,000 copies a good number for a DVD? I'm not actually sure. I know a AAA-budgeted game is considered a failure if it hits under a million — but the costs, etc, involved are very different.
 
Posted by FlyingCow (Member # 2150) on :
 
For a DVD boxed set of a television show, I'd imagine that's quite high... especially for a cancelled show that was aired out of order.

Once the movie was announced, I'm sure sales improved as well.

Don't forget that Firefly was also juggled in timeslot multiple times, adding to the difficulty.

I never saw it when it was aired... though I remembered seeing a commercial for it once, and looking for it one night I thought it was going to be on and not finding it. It wasn't until Chris Bridges started talking it up leading into the movie that I got hooked.

I'm willing to give Dollhouse a few more episodes, and I'm hoping Fox is too.

I was also hoping they'd give Drive more episodes, which they didn't... and I enjoyed the first few episodes of that more than I've enjoyed the first few of Dollhouse.
 
Posted by Corwin (Member # 5705) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Stephan:
closed ended dramas

What are those? Some examples wouldn't hurt too. [Smile]
 
Posted by Stephan (Member # 7549) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Corwin:
quote:
Originally posted by Stephan:
closed ended dramas

What are those? Some examples wouldn't hurt too. [Smile]
Law and Order is one example.

Basically where you can pretty much watch a single episode at any point in the series, with little to no back ground knowledge. If I started with the third episode of Dollhouse I would be lost. They want to move away from serial dramas like Lost and 24.

They are also finding old fashioned laugh track sitcoms are fairing better right now. Many were shocked to find Two and a Half Men doing better in the ratings than The Office.
 
Posted by Corwin (Member # 5705) on :
 
Oh, gotcha. Thanks. [Smile]
 
Posted by sarcasticmuppet (Member # 5035) on :
 
Possible spoilers in this post...


I actually kinda liked this past episode. I thought Echo's remote wipe made for an interesting twist, and it focused a little more on the Dollhouse itself rather than the engagements, which I find a lot more interesting, mostly because it's so mysterious right now. The politics are becoming a little clearer, and Adelle was finally seen in a position of some vulnerability. It's still kinda weak, but it's much improved from the first three episodes.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
quote:
Many were shocked to find Two and a Half Men doing better in the ratings than The Office.
Because the television audience is stupid. I mean, after all, they didn't like Firefly, right?
 
Posted by JennaDean (Member # 8816) on :
 
Well, I don't like either one (Two and a Half Men or The Office). But I do like The Big Bang Theory and How I Met Your Mother ... surprising, after I thought the sitcom was dead. But they do tend to sort of have story arcs - especially HIMYM. I like them both better than Lost.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Nighthawk:
Because the television audience is stupid. I mean, after all, they didn't like Firefly, right?

Again, I feel the need to reiterate that fact that a television audience didn't really get a chance to like Firefly. I have showed / lent my DVD set out nearly a dozen times, to a wide range of television audiencees, and so far they've all loved it.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
quote:
It wasn't until Chris Bridges started talking it up leading into the movie that I got hooked.
Mwah ha ha ha ha! (Mine is an evil laugh!)
 
Posted by Achilles (Member # 7741) on :
 
Curse you and your inevitable betrayal!
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
Again, I feel the need to reiterate that fact that a television audience didn't really get a chance to like Firefly.
Hey, I watched and loved it when it was on TV. So did my brothers. So that's three of us, at least.
 
Posted by Sterling (Member # 8096) on :
 
I fear I'm in the "hoping the show gets better" camp at this point. Episodes 1-3 were all right. 4 annoyed me. It seems clear that the Dollhouse has resources other than Actives available to it; it would be nice to stop sending Actives and their Handlers into situations that would be better handled by a single, regular expert. Episode 4 felt like we spent a lot of time watching our lead, and the supposedly competent staff surrounding her, spend a lot of time standing around going "Uh..."
 
Posted by scholarette (Member # 11540) on :
 
It looks like next week Helo sees Echo. That could be interesting. I also wasn't that impressed by the last episode. It seemed like it would be a lot cheaper to just hire an expert thief. Of course, I suppose it is possible that the client some how had the dollhouse connection but not the thief connection (though that seems a bit weird too). I think it would have been more interesting to have the mystery person who wiped Echo not be Alpha (or implied to be Alpha). Another mysterious rival organization could be a fun deepening of the plot. Of course, so far Alpha just hasn't interested me.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
quote:
It seemed like it would be a lot cheaper to just hire an expert thief.
An "expert thief", no matter how professional he/she may be, (1) will always remember their involvement, (2) will probably cost more in terms of taking a share of the multi-million dollar prize for the theft.
 
Posted by Amilia (Member # 8912) on :
 
quote:
It seemed like it would be a lot cheaper to just hire an expert thief. Of course, I suppose it is possible that the client some how had the dollhouse connection but not the thief connection (though that seems a bit weird too).
Weirder still . . . it seemed like it would be a lot cheaper to just hire an expert midwife.
 
Posted by scholarette (Member # 11540) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Amilia:
quote:
It seemed like it would be a lot cheaper to just hire an expert thief. Of course, I suppose it is possible that the client some how had the dollhouse connection but not the thief connection (though that seems a bit weird too).
Weirder still . . . it seemed like it would be a lot cheaper to just hire an expert midwife.
I figured the guy was a sleazy guy and wanted a midwife with benefits.
 
Posted by Amilia (Member # 8912) on :
 
Huh. That angle didn't even occur to me. Did I miss something?
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
It didn't occur to me either, and I don't think you missed anything.
 
Posted by scholarette (Member # 11540) on :
 
I don't think there was any actual reason for that assumption. I based it on the idea that many of her prior jobs have had romantic angles and a real midwife seems like a much smarter idea. I can come up with other reasons but this one actually was the least unpleasant. If they for some reason needed the birth to be kept untraceable, using a doll would make sense.
 
Posted by Elmer's Glue (Member # 9313) on :
 
I don't think it's that unbelievable that they would just want the absolute best.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
Weren't they up on the top of a mountain or something like that? If you know you're going to be far away from modern medical care, having the best would be even more important.
 
Posted by Abyss (Member # 3086) on :
 
The whole point of the dollhouse, I think, is that their "personality composites" are better than any living human being at their specific task/tasks. So to steal something REALLY well guarded or really important to the client, no normal thief would do.

Doesn't really explain the midwife thing. But the midwife with benefits idea made me laugh.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mr_porteiro_head:
Weren't they up on the top of a mountain or something like that? If you know you're going to be far away from modern medical care, having the best would be even more important.

Transportation also probably plays a factor. I mean, the Dollhouse owns military-grade helicopters! They could program the best midwife there is and drop her anywhere in the world almost instantly. That's got to be worth something!
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
I sort of thought the midwife thing might play into something later. You know, it's put at the beginning to make it look like she has all kinds of engagements, but actually there's a broader point to it that we will find out later.

Maybe just wishful thinking...
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
Well, there is a parallel between the conventional midwifery that Echo is engaging in at the beginning of the show and the metaphorical midwifery being performed by the explosives expert helping Echo into reality by looking at and talking about art.
 
Posted by Hobbes (Member # 433) on :
 
Personally, I like the idea of someone whose all right with reprogramming people for anything at all, but doesn't want to use a hospital to deliver a child.

Hobbes [Smile]
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
Maybe it was his wife who didn't want to deliver in a hospital, and it made him nervous enough to hire a midwife that was better than the best in the world.
 
Posted by Sterling (Member # 8096) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Abyss:
The whole point of the dollhouse, I think, is that their "personality composites" are better than any living human being at their specific task/tasks.

Has that implicitly been stated in the show, that the composites really are better than equivalent "real" experts?

I can believe that some members of the Dollhouse might think so, and some more or less make their jobs based upon that as a sales pitch. But based on what we've seen so far, I don't know that I buy it as anything beyond a sales pitch- much like the two hundred dollar pen that doesn't really do the job any better than the eighty-nine cent Bic jobbie. Sure, both get the job done, but...

What we've seen thus far suggests that, barring unusual circumstances, "actives" will get the job done. But they're also erratic, unpredictable, limited in scope, and the 'House seems peculiarly unable to remove potentially dangerous qualities from the composites.

It doesn't seem right now that a choice between Dollhouse and a regular expert is a choice between best and second best; it seems like it's a choice between the best regularly available and the best personality the Dollhouse happens to have on file.

I can buy the "I need someone who won't remember the details of what they've done" angle, though the direction of the show seems to suggest ultimately that may be a wash as well.
 
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
 
How would you state something implicitly?
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
I think a large part of why Dollhouse has clientele is the secrecy that could be obtained. The last episode, for instance, had a heavy focus on the client making sure that no one knew of what the job was. No one in the Dollhouse administration, and after the job, not even the active.

And that, of course, is assuming everything goes to plan.
 
Posted by Sterling (Member # 8096) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by El JT de Spang:
How would you state something implicitly?

I don't know... If someone were to say something like, "In 98% of violent altercations involving clients, Dollhouse actives were able to contain the situation without injury to clients, versus a rate of 56% with ordinary security companies," that would be something. I realize that given the rather broad range of services Dollhouse's "actives" seem to offer, that would be hard to assess on a large scale. Particularly since a non-trivial amount of their hires seem to amount to acting as an escort agency.

But again, that begs the question- why are all these people turning to Dollhouse, anyway? The missions they've shown us are far from convincing that Dollhouse would be most clients' best choice.

quote:
Originally posted by The White Whale:
I think a large part of why Dollhouse has clientele is the secrecy that could be obtained. The last episode, for instance, had a heavy focus on the client making sure that no one knew of what the job was. No one in the Dollhouse administration, and after the job, not even the active.

And frankly, that still baffles me a bit. How could most of the support personnel perform their jobs without at least some knowledge of what was being installed in the Active's mind? How could they know there was a higher risk for the active in episode 2, for example, without having some idea what she was going to be doing?
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
My take was that it's not normal for nobody to know what was going on, but that the situation in this last episode was a special case.
 
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sterling:
quote:
Originally posted by El JT de Spang:
How would you state something implicitly?

I don't know... If someone were to say something like, "In 98% of violent altercations involving clients, Dollhouse actives were able to contain the situation without injury to clients, versus a rate of 56% with ordinary security companies," that would be something.
That would be stating it explicitly. Which was my (nit-picky) point. [Smile]
 
Posted by Sterling (Member # 8096) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by El JT de Spang:
quote:
Originally posted by Sterling:
quote:
Originally posted by El JT de Spang:
How would you state something implicitly?

I don't know... If someone were to say something like, "In 98% of violent altercations involving clients, Dollhouse actives were able to contain the situation without injury to clients, versus a rate of 56% with ordinary security companies," that would be something.
That would be stating it explicitly. Which was my (nit-picky) point. [Smile]
Good (though nit-pickey) point. I don't think it's implicitly clear, either, though, for many of the same reasons.
 
Posted by Dogbreath (Member # 11879) on :
 
I like the idea (was a huge fan of the Pretender back in the day), but I feel Echo isn't "becoming" the role full enough.

One obvious lack is accent - she has the exact same "tough girl" accent in every single case so far. Same inflection, exact same way of saying words, etc. Sierra has shown that the actives are quite capable of being programmed with new accents, so how is it good for, say, a midwife to have the same harsh pronunciation as a robber?

In the Pretender Jarod (who was aware of what he was going, and actively worked to change his persona each episode) would adopt a new accent for every pretend. First, it'd be accurate to whatever area of the country he was in, but also, he'd have one accent for doctor like characters - very calm, clear enunciation, steady pitch - and another for gangsters and lowlifes.

I just think they need to figure out how to really change Echo's personality - because putting in new job skills, but leaving the exact same personality for every job isn't really cutting it.

[ March 12, 2009, 06:07 PM: Message edited by: Dogbreath ]
 
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
 
It seems like the whole idea of the show was to develop a platform to show Dushku's range.

Only no one to into account that she has none.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Bing!
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
Tonight's episode was the best of the season so far.

Sigh...now I'm invested enough to be concerned about cancellation.
 
Posted by Brinestone (Member # 5755) on :
 
Next week's episode is the famed sixth, and it does look like it'll be interesting.

Funny, Clive, I was thinking tonight's episode was my least favorite so far.
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brinestone:
Funny, Clive, I was thinking tonight's episode was my least favorite so far.

Worse than "Stage Freight"? I think tonight's ep contained the strongest arc-related plot progression yet--Dominic's antipathy towards Echo was revealed to run to murderous depths and Ballard spotted Echo.

One thing the show has been doing a lot so far is that early on they introduce an interesting Plot B relating to the Dollhouse that is merely RAISED but never resolved. In tonight's ep, it was Victor's attraction to Sierra in the shower room. A very intriguing development...yet nothing results from it within the episode. We didn't even get a scene in which Victor and Sierra interact outside the shower.

Oh, episode 6, it's all on you...

[ March 14, 2009, 03:10 AM: Message edited by: Clive Candy ]
 
Posted by Vadon (Member # 4561) on :
 
I loved the teaser for the next episode. I can't remember the exact wording, but it essentially was "Forget everything you know about this show! Now everything changes!"

I thought the episode was okay. I couldn't pay attention to it too closely, but from what I could see it was an infiltration of a Jim Jones camp right? I just kind of wished it would be a more unique premise. :Shrug:
 
Posted by swbarnes2 (Member # 10225) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by El JT de Spang:
It seems like the whole idea of the show was to develop a platform to show Dushku's range.

Only no one to into account that she has none.

I think Joss explicitly said that was a factor in some interview, and I agree, I'm not seeing that she's got any. If she'd gotten people out of the burning buliding without resorting to anything sounding remotely like "move your ass", it would have been a million times better. I just didn't see why Esther would have done what she did. But the heroine of a Joss show, sure, she would have done exatly that.

Amy Acker, she's got range. Joss said he did the Illyria thing after seeing her play Lady Macbeth, realizing that she could be as dark as Fred was bright.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I didn't think this was a great or terrible episode. So far I don't get why people are loving Amy Acker, although I didn't see whatever it was she was in before this.
 
Posted by Glenn Arnold (Member # 3192) on :
 
I don't see anything particularly interesting about the way she's handling her character, but I'm very interested in the character herself.

quote:
If she'd gotten people out of the burning buliding without resorting to anything sounding remotely like "move your ass", it would have been a million times better.
Maybe. I thought she (Dushku) did a fine job as Esther initially, but it was short lived. But the point is that her own characteristics are overpowering the imprint. Esther would not have done as she did, but she isn't Esther.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
A conundrum I realized after watching this episode is that the actress may be hoping to "grow" into the roll over time, improving her acting skills in the process. Except that she's already starting to composite various personalities 5 episodes in, which means we only have those first four episodes to showcase her really "becoming" various other people, and therefore that's where she needs to be at the peak of her acting skills. Conversely, as she amalgamates in the generic "tough girl" persona, it becomes less necessary for her to stretch herself.
 
Posted by Glenn Arnold (Member # 3192) on :
 
I don't think she'll amalgamate overall. They'll keep giving her opportunities to play different characters, but each one will be like a homework assignment. Get the character down, do some exercises, and then let Caroline show through. Very repertory theatre like.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Caroline? (I forgot, was that the original person?)
 
Posted by Glenn Arnold (Member # 3192) on :
 
That's the name the FBI guy is looking for.
 
Posted by sylvrdragon (Member # 3332) on :
 
Hmm... So far, this show is making me want to pretend it never existed so I can go watch Firefly or Dr. Horrible and pretend that Joss Whedon can still do no wrong. (Never seen Buffy, though I've heard things...)

I can't bring myself to care about any of the characters. None of them have really done anything that I can empathize with. Most of them seem like mindless automatons even when they're not supposed to be. Furthermore, nearly every character is a cliche.

Caretaker guy seems pretty smart, capable, and morally sane, but unfortunately, the actor could be replaced with a cardboard cut-out and I don't think anyone would notice.

I think it's up to Alpha to save the series, but I have my doubts even here. So far, it seems like he's just going to be some swiss army-knife all around bad guy with no depth whatsoever. A typical Bond Villain. He's already the boogey-man with all the hot ninja skills, and since last week's episode, he's a hacker too. From the psycho-bow-guy episode, he's methodical and cunning... in short: He's boring.
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
Nah, dude, it's Alan Tudyk. I feel sure we can count on his being interesting.
 
Posted by Christine (Member # 8594) on :
 
I just watched the first 5 episodes back to back this weekend. I haven't read through most of this thread because it's so long, but skimming through the last page of comments, I have to say that I'm floored at the negativity. I am really enjoying this show and it keeps getting a little better with each episode.

No, I'm not feeling classic sympathy for any one character, but I am intrigued by many of the characters and I do care what happens to them. There aren't "good guys" and "bad guys" and I'm not sure who to root for, but under the premise it doesn't matter.

I'm finding the acting to be decent. I think Boyd is my favorite (Echo's handler). Eliza Dushku is doing a good job with the different personalities and with the underlying idea that there is a core of her in each one. Yes, they're starting to blend together. That's kind of the point. The acting isn't great, but it's good enough for now. I also find that actors grow into their roles over a series and get better at them.

They are doing a good job balancing both the episodic and the long-term story arc, bringing out subtle clues and hints about what is coming. They seem to have an actual plan, which is more than I can say for a lot of shows. They are staying relatively consistent.
 
Posted by Alcon (Member # 6645) on :
 
Don't pass any final judgments until this Friday. That's when Joss Whedon gets control back. Until then, it's not really a Whedon show.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
At least that's what they've been saying. I hope it's true.
 
Posted by ClaudiaTherese (Member # 923) on :
 
Hulu has the pilot episode up for only three more days. If you are counting on Hulu, kiss it now or lose it forever.

Christine, you expressed my reactions exactly. Hey, thanks!
 
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
 
Hulu typically is only allowed to show the 5 most recent episodes of any currently running series (although not even that many for some -- House, for instance, has only two new eps up). So when ep. 6 goes up, it'll replace ep. 1.

-------------------------

I liked the last episode, but I got really annoyed with the ATF AIC went from being basically a true believer in justice to a vigilante with no provocation. When he told the team to let Boyd die (or shoot him if he was inside -- I forget which), it was the equivalent of a D&D alignment shift. Totally out of character, and crappy storytelling.

I will be very surprised if the show takes a great leap forward on ep. 6.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
Yeah, I didn't really buy that one either.

SPOILERS:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I could see him faking the "Save me" on the back of the note, but not the "turning on Boyd" bit.

Another thing that I didn't buy was the security guy's behavior with regard to Echo. I mean, I could see him killing her, since he's convinced that she's a budding Alpha, but why would he have shot Mr. Culty? Why not just let him take Echo out? Or if he did shoot, why not mow down both of them and leave the gun so it'd look like a murder/suicide?

quote:
I will be very surprised if the show takes a great leap forward on ep. 6.
I'm skeptical, but I'm open to the idea of it improving dramatically with Joss at the helm.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Glenn Arnold:
I don't think she'll amalgamate overall. They'll keep giving her opportunities to play different characters, but each one will be like a homework assignment. Get the character down, do some exercises, and then let Caroline show through. Very repertory theatre like.

I have a very bad feeling that Caroline is the daughter of the woman running the Dollhouse.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by El JT de Spang:
I liked the last episode, but I got really annoyed with the ATF AIC went from being basically a true believer in justice to a vigilante with no provocation. When he told the team to let Boyd die (or shoot him if he was inside -- I forget which), it was the equivalent of a D&D alignment shift. Totally out of character, and crappy storytelling.

I disagree. It struck me as a panic reaction, once he realized that Boyd held his life and career in the palm of his hand.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
quote:
I have a very bad feeling that Caroline is the daughter of the woman running the Dollhouse.
That hadn't occurred to me yet, but I don't see why it's necessarily bad. (I don't know that it actually makes much sense - it doesn't do anything explain why the woman is ignoring the "Alpha like" warning signs.)
 
Posted by Sterling (Member # 8096) on :
 
I don't hate it, but it isn't stirring up fierce loyalty in me, either.

Right now I have a bad feeling that this is going to be a show that develops more and more holes as it goes on, rather than one that rewards people for remembering minutiae. Shows with holes can be fun, of course, but they also make long-term plot arcs problematic.
 
Posted by Glenn Arnold (Member # 3192) on :
 
quote:
I have a very bad feeling that Caroline is the daughter of the woman running the Dollhouse.
Based on their interaction in the interview I don't believe this is true. Also, during that interview Caroline says "I was just trying to take my place in the world... Like she always said." The "she" sounds like it would be her mother.
 
Posted by sylvrdragon (Member # 3332) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sterling:

Right now I have a bad feeling that this is going to be a show that develops more and more holes as it goes on, rather than one that rewards people for remembering minutiae. Shows with holes can be fun, of course, but they also make long-term plot arcs problematic.

[Eek!] I didn't even realize that this is the kind of show that I'm attracted to until you said that. Looking back, it seems so obvious. I love series wrought with Cameos, Memes, and inside jokes throughout. The ones that you can go back and watch a dozen times and find something new every time. Things that people can tell you some random fact about and you say "Holy crap, I didn't even notice. I liked it before, but now..." Stories that are so meticulously planned out that nothing is an accident and their are no holes. This is why Fight Club is still my favorite movie of all time.
 
Posted by lem (Member # 6914) on :
 
I am enjoying the show. The only thing that is bothering me, besides Echo always returning to be a badass, is that I don't see the motive for the FBI agent who is tracking The Dollhouse.

I know he is now getting clues, but his obsession started before the clues. Unless they hint at how he was personally affected by the Dollhouse, I just don't buy his character.
 
Posted by Shanna (Member # 7900) on :
 
I'm discovering that my biggest problem with Dollhouse is that Caroline is pretty much Faith in a polo shirt. I'm really turned off by the possibility that Echo's original personality is going to become more prominent.

I also really wish the show would focus more on the characters and less on the "mission of the week." I have high hopes since it seems like alot of Joss' series start off like this, so hopefully episode 6 will really be the game-changer that the show needs. I'm really intrigued by Boyd and Topher and FBI-neighbor-girl. And I'm enjoying Sierra's and Victor's performances as well. I want to see more of all of them.

I have to say, I was really starting to think that Joss was improving on his leads. I've always preferred his secondary cast of characters but completely fell in love with Mal and Dr. Horrible. I never thought I'd see the day when Joss would create a main protagonist more annoying than Buffy.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
I don't know about that. Tru wasn't Faith. She was way more vulnerable, and didn't have a fraction of Faith's edge. I don't see Caroline being Faith either.
 
Posted by Brinestone (Member # 5755) on :
 
My predictions about next week are that one of two things will happen:

1. Echo will escape the dollhouse after meeting up with Ballard. She will be imprinted with her personality du jour, which will now be permanent, so she will struggle with not really knowing who she is. She and Ballard will work together to bring down the dollhouse, and her personal connection with Victor and Sierra will work to her advantage.

2. Ballard will get too close, find out too much, and will be forced to choose between becoming an active and death, just as Echo did once upon a time.

I think part of the problem with the show as it stands is that nobody is in a position to truly love or care for one another. As such, the show feels heartless and none of the characters feel quite human. Also, the owners of the dollhouse seem to be shaping into the villains, so we're not supposed to relate to them. That only leaves Ballard and Boyd as the "hearts" of the show, and neither of them really fit the part. I really think Echo needs to get out of the dollhouse.
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
I like that the geeky scientist is arguably the most morally deranged and powerful of the lot. It's the mid-level dweeb who is really the engine for the dollhouse. Usually those guys are cast as benign or naive, but his eyes are wide open.

There seems to be a relationship budding between the doctor and the ex-cop. Even the head of security may not be such a black hat villain, and watching the head lady's world start to unravel may be neat. It's always nice to see control freaks come face to face with human finitude and the unpredictability of the future. She is doing well so far, but there is a potential for really explosive scenes.
 
Posted by Brinestone (Member # 5755) on :
 
I agree with everything you just said.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong:
Even the head of security may not be such a black hat villain

Agreed. He's accurately perceiving that Echo is headed down the same path that Alpha travelled, and Alpha is very dangerous and, from his perspective, clearly evil. It makes sense for him to try to get rid of Echo before she can become the threat that Alpha is.

Now, we've seen stuff from before he began to actively suspect Echo that indicates that he's an unplesant person, but that doesn't make him evil.
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
I disagree with the fact that Topher is utterly moral deranged. When he and the doctor realised that Victor liked Sierra both of them were delighted and then depressed when told that this must be scrubbed out of Victor.

I do not think he is benign or naive. I think it's perfectly possible to be involved in morally bankrupt scientific endeavours and not be utterly evil yourself, even if you're not just following orders.

Take Claire, for example. I do not see her being on any scale evil or bad. She does not hate Topher, although she does not like him.

quote:
Even the head of security may not be such a black hat villain
Echo's instinctive dislike of him seems to suggest otherwise, unless we are to distrust her feelings.

quote:
Now, we've seen stuff from before he began to actively suspect Echo that indicates that he's an unplesant person, but that doesn't make him evil.
I'm not sure anyone is definitively evil at the moment.

quote:
I think part of the problem with the show as it stands is that nobody is in a position to truly love or care for one another.
Nor do I think this is true. Claire cares for the dolls and I think Topher, in his way, does too, as does the Leader Lady. Boyd cares personally for Echo, this has been made abundantly clear.

If anything, it is Ballard who has demonstrated the least empathy. He fills the gap left for a hero but so far we have not been presented with someone who demonstrates heroic qualities. He lacks empathy in general, which is not to say he doesn't legitimately want to get the dollhouse people, or feel that what they are doing is wrong, or be right about that fact. But I think that it is wrong to think of Ballard as the heart of the show.

I think Echo is supposed to be the heart of the show. Mostly everyone is better disposed towards her than anyone else.

Clearly episode six has Ballard and Echo meet and once they have there can only be a few logical directions, but I don't really see Echo ceasing to be a doll, although it is possible, at least for a short time.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
Echo's instinctive dislike of him seems to suggest otherwise, unless we are to distrust her feelings.
What instinctive dislike? Are you referring to the end of this last episode? I chalk that up to her remembering him attacking her.
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
Oh well, perhaps I'm making stuff up where none exists.
 
Posted by Christine (Member # 8594) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brinestone:
My predictions about next week are that one of two things will happen:

1. Echo will escape the dollhouse after meeting up with Ballard. She will be imprinted with her personality du jour, which will now be permanent, so she will struggle with not really knowing who she is. She and Ballard will work together to bring down the dollhouse, and her personal connection with Victor and Sierra will work to her advantage.

2. Ballard will get too close, find out too much, and will be forced to choose between becoming an active and death, just as Echo did once upon a time.

I think part of the problem with the show as it stands is that nobody is in a position to truly love or care for one another. As such, the show feels heartless and none of the characters feel quite human. Also, the owners of the dollhouse seem to be shaping into the villains, so we're not supposed to relate to them. That only leaves Ballard and Boyd as the "hearts" of the show, and neither of them really fit the part. I really think Echo needs to get out of the dollhouse.

When I read this, I started to wonder if we were watching the same show. My ideas of what the show is and what they are trying to do far removed from these comments that it's difficult to know how to approach them. I thought I was watching a show that is essentially a search for the human soul. As such, it is not at all heartless or inhuman -- just the opposite!

I figure Echo may leave the dollhouse for a time at some point, but not yet. She's not ready. They've already shown that she can be remotely wiped or made to remember her past in some way and I think they will build on that for a while.

What I'm intrigued by is the motivations of the people who work at the dollhouse. As someone pointed out, mid-level dweeb has his eyes wide open. So why's he doing it? Why's Boyd doing it? The doctor? For good or evil, I hope the show brings out these motivations.
 
Posted by lem (Member # 6914) on :
 
I am officially in love with the show.

*Spoiler*

Someone on the inside trying to find out the true purpose of The Dollhouse? Global conspiracy? 20 dollhouses? Echo being programmed to bring down the dollhouse because someone on the inside is actively programming her and passively ruining the process? EEEk eeeeek giddy giddy. Finally a new show I can totally get into. w00t!

Didn't see that coming.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I was a little wary of the speech Echo gave the FBI guy. It did make sense for it to be true, but it might have been part of their manipulation of him.

Anyway, as promised the show got a lot better. Here's hoping it stays that way.
 
Posted by Christine (Member # 8594) on :
 
LOVED IT LOVED IT!

Could be someone on the inside trying to figure out what's going on...could be the boss lady playing her games. I mean, she did send that handler to his death in the same episode. She's quite resourceful.

I wasn't liking the FBI guy until this episode but suddenly his role started to make more sense. I loved the neighbor being a sleeper agent (suspected something of the sort, actually).

Agreed...20 dollhouses? And a possible bigger motive for the dollhouse than profit is definitely something I can get behind.

Very exciting developments!

On a separate but related note:

Did anyone else think this could have been a better first episode than the original? The man on the street, which somewhat annoyed me, also served to introduce the concept of the dollhouse far better than they originally did. Also, this episode made the FBI guy the focus, giving viewers that one character they can sympathize with. (Though I don't have a problem not specifically sympathizing with anyone.)

I'm in this one for the long haul. Now, PLEASE DON'T CANCEL!
 
Posted by Vadon (Member # 4561) on :
 
It was a very impressive improvement from the previous episodes. It makes me wonder why I sat through those first five and didn't just start now. It really was another show entirely.
 
Posted by Glenn Arnold (Member # 3192) on :
 
I can't remember the line, but it was something like "it's what we do, but it's not our purpose."

Makes me think of Primatech paper, and morally grey. I wonder of the Dollhouse is working against its network of wealthy and powerful clients, a conspiracy against a conspiracy.
 
Posted by swbarnes2 (Member # 10225) on :
 
Now that BSG is done, we have another show where anyone could reveal themselves to be a sleeper agent at any time. The agent on the inside who altered the imprint might not even know what s/he did.

The question is, is Mellie a total doll, through and through, her original personality wiped to fill this role, or was she just nudged into lliking Paul, and imprinted with triggerable combat abilities.

Because Paul may not want to rescue the girl the Mellie started out to be, if her current personality is a doll. It's very hard to argue that the current personality isn't a person, who has just as much right to exist as the old personality did.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Christine:
... And a possible bigger motive for the dollhouse than profit is definitely something I can get behind.

It has been something I've been wondering. Even the big amounts of cash that they collect from clients seems to be small compared to the cost of this facility, the technology involved, and the cost of secrecy.
It would make sense if there was a bigger game afoot like capturing loads of blackmail information on their clients which tend to be the rich and powerful, using that to gain power behind the scenes.
 
Posted by Vadon (Member # 4561) on :
 
I bet there's quite a bit of Manchurian Candidate things going on. Perhaps a few dolls are in public office that help guarantee that they won't lose funding. Maybe they kidnap current politicians and just program in a desire to keep the Dollhouse operational and leave every other memory in tact.

There's a lot of potential. I love it. [Smile]
 
Posted by Tara (Member # 10030) on :
 
This got a terrible review from someone in People Magazine who apparently did like Buffy and Firefly.
 
Posted by Jeorge (Member # 11524) on :
 
I had a weird moment of deja vu yesterday. I've been watching Buffy on hulu, and I just yesterday got to the episode where Buffy and Faith are having this massive fight over whether Faith is going to kill Angel. About two thirds of the way through, I was thinking to myself, "This fight is going on too long."

Then last night, when Faith...I mean, Echo...was fighting with the FBI guy, I thought, "This fight is going on too..."

Huh. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by TL (Member # 8124) on :
 
Bad, lame television: 5
The home viewership: 1

If the next four episodes are good, it'll be a tie. As good as this last episode was, I still find myself disappointed by that....
 
Posted by Olivet (Member # 1104) on :
 
I will be really, really surprised if this show isn't canceled, and pleasantly surprised if they leave it on long enough to show us all the episodes they've made.

Had it not been for JW's name on the project, I would not have watched past the first episode. It improved steadily, but I suspect it is doomed.

I will be pleased to be proven wrong, though.
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
Ooo, I believe this show has officially hit its stride. This episode was excellent. The characters were all interesting - lovely.
 
Posted by FlyingCow (Member # 2150) on :
 
This episode was great, but I think Fox's meddling with the first five effectively sabotaged the ratings enough to spell its doom.

I'll keep watching until they turn out the lights, though. And I'll keep a sharp eye on when they change the day and time.
 
Posted by sylvrdragon (Member # 3332) on :
 
I agree that this last episode was a success.

I think either Echo's speech was part of Boss Lady's manipulation, or Topher's apprentice (possibly in league with Boyd) is the mole.

Anyone who DIDN'T suspect Neighbor girl as an active must have been watching a different show. I was actually kinda sad that it came true considering how blatantly obvious it was.

As for the Dollhouse being a cover for a bigger conspiracy, there are really only ever 3 motives for conspiracy: Money, Faith, or Patriotism (Politics 'For the greater good'). Well, I should say for a "Large Scale" conspiracy, as I'm sure the Pride of some rich powerful person could create some waves beneath the surface, but it doesn't seem likely when so many people are apparently involved.

I suppose there could be some sorta sci-fi "Save the world" plot, but so far, I can't really see a way to pull that off, so I'm banking with one of the big 3.
 
Posted by Alcon (Member # 6645) on :
 
Boy did Fox frack up the first five or so. This was definitely a completely different show. All I have to say: He's baaack!

And once again in a situation where someone's screwing with him and not just letting him do his thing. Hopefully they'll realize that it was their screwing with him that got the bad ratings and reviews and give him enough time to do his thing and bring the good.
 
Posted by sarcasticmuppet (Member # 5035) on :
 
Holy cow, that was a good episode. The story was interesting, the characters were engaging, and there were enough twists and turns to interest me. I have to admit I wasn't expecting Millie to be a doll, mostly because I had a pet theory she was unknowingly in league with Alpha.

This episode wasn't even about Echo, which probably also makes it the best episode ever. She was in maybe what, three scenes? The people surrounding her in and out of the dollhouse are far more interesting.
 
Posted by Christine (Member # 8594) on :
 
Out of curiosity, where do you get the rating information you keep going on about? People keep saying that the show has bad ratings, is in danger of getting canceled...based on???

I've never been clear what makes a show succeed and what makes it fail. I tend not to watch new shows because quite frankly, the ones I get into get canceled. The ones that suck go on for years and years. So suckage doesn't seem to have much to do with the success or failure of a show. Let's not forget that Fox put this thing on Fridya night, which has to be the worst time slot imaginable. Makes me wonder how much faith they had in the show in the first place.

And for the record, while I thought that episode 6 was once again an improvement over the one before, I enjoyed the first 5 and still do not see what all the hostility towards them is about. It's a good show.
 
Posted by Sala (Member # 8980) on :
 
Ahh, finally a good episode. All of the previous five were standard rehashes of standard tropes. Man chasing girl to kill her. Girl as whore. Girl in cult. My husband hated the first five episodes and said he might actually like the show now!
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
quote:
Out of curiosity, where do you get the rating information you keep going on about? People keep saying that the show has bad ratings, is in danger of getting canceled...based on???
There are various websites that have information on ratings. I'm not sure which is the best, but if you google it I'm sure you can find something helpful. Ratings are based purely on how many people watch in each demographic (which is ultimately all that matters to advertisers). Unfortunately "good" shows tend to have more complicated plots that make it harder for a random person to show up and start watching.

By contrast, if you turn on the TV set and happen to find myself halfway through any given sitcom, you can usually count on being reasonably entertained for 20 minutes. The very fact that the plot is so bland and predictable makes it easy to just start watching.
 
Posted by Vadon (Member # 4561) on :
 
On the ratings question, I just check the wikipedia page. They have a list of episodes down lower with rating information and how many viewers there were in millions. (According to Nielson.)

It's actually out performing Terminator right now.

[ March 22, 2009, 04:58 PM: Message edited by: Vadon ]
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
Ratings so far:

Episode 1 - 4.8 million, 2.0 in 18-49 demo.
Episode 2 - 4.3 million, 1.7 in 18-49 demo. 5% share.
Episode 3 - 4.2 million, 1.6 in 18-49 demo. 5% share.
Episode 4 - 3.5 million, 1.5 in 18-49 demo, 5% share.
Episode 5 - 4.3 million, 1.6 in 18-49 demo, 5% share.
Episode 6 - 4.1 million, 1.5 in 18-49 demo, 5% share.

For the most part, it's holding steady (and, as noted, is outperforming its lead-in show). And a big thing to note, this episode ran against the NCAA tournament and the finale of Battlestar Galactica. Given that, holding steady is nothing short of amazing.

Also, DVR numbers add a third again to those numbers. I don't know how much FOX takes that into account, but this show has a huge percentage of time-shifted viewers.
 
Posted by Mrs.M (Member # 2943) on :
 
quote:
And for the record, while I thought that episode 6 was once again an improvement over the one before, I enjoyed the first 5 and still do not see what all the hostility towards them is about. It's a good show.
Me too.

Patton Oswalt was great and it was really interesting that Echo remembered the assignment and wanted to finish it. And Eliza Dushku was really funny when she said, "Porn!" when she was being removed.
 
Posted by FlyingCow (Member # 2150) on :
 
I'm curious how much time-shifted viewers can be taken account. Ratings numbers are used to woo advertisers... and DVR pretty much kills commercial advertising.

Though Dollhouse has had its fair share of product placement, which would have to be taken into account with time-shifted viewing.
 
Posted by Vadon (Member # 4561) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by FlyingCow:
I'm curious how much time-shifted viewers can be taken account. Ratings numbers are used to woo advertisers... and DVR pretty much kills commercial advertising.

Though Dollhouse has had its fair share of product placement, which would have to be taken into account with time-shifted viewing.

And there's Hulu. How is that taken into account for continued production? It is one of the most popular shows on the website.
 
Posted by FlyingCow (Member # 2150) on :
 
Advertising is getting trickier and trickier. DVR and the internet are killing the commercial advertising model.

It makes me wonder if, once DVRs become as standard as VCRs did, there will be even more of a push into product placement over commercials. And, if so, what happens to shows that can't manage any product placement because of their subject matter?

I feel the advertising/funding paradigm of television is set to shift dramatically over the next few years.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
First, I'm really impressed with Hulu. Great quality, minimal commercials, and I can watch it when I want? Excellent. I haven't been watching live television for a long time now, and every time I do, I can feel the brains leaking out of my ears.

Second, what a great episode! I think my jaw fell slack three times. And I really liked the whole thing with the rich Internet guy.

Please don't cancel it!
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:

Anyone who DIDN'T suspect Neighbor girl as an active must have been watching a different show.

I must have been watching another show, then.
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
I suspected she was. She just had such a sweet innocent face and such sweet innocent lasagna.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
I didn't either.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Nor did I.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
I was pretty sure she was, but during that episode I started doubting since she was urging the Fed to keep investigating. Darn you, Whedon!
 
Posted by Vadon (Member # 4561) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Chris Bridges:
I was pretty sure she was, but during that episode I started doubting since she was urging the Fed to keep investigating. Darn you, Whedon!

I actually was going back and forth through the whole episode. After Victor was revealed as an active I was immediately suspicious of anyone who the agent works with or around. But after how happy they seemed in this episode, I stopped suspecting. Then the boss-lady (haven't memorized her name yet) was watching with a camera so I was suspecting her again. Then she told evil-handler to kill her so I thought that she was not an active...

I just kept bouncing back and forth and having my perceptions twisted. I loved every minute of it.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Fyfe:
I suspected she was. She just had such a sweet innocent face and such sweet innocent lasagna.

In my world, having an innocent face and making home-cooked meals is not suspicious. [Wink]

Although I should have been suspicious that they kept paying more attention to her than her role seemed to deserve.
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
quote:
In my world, having an innocent face and making home-cooked meals is not suspicious.
That'll just make the inevitable all the more surprising.
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
I just came to realize that, regardless of Fox's meddling, there really is no excuse for the average poor quality of the first five episodes. Whedon should start taking responsibility for producing poor quality material. He blames the failure of the Buffy movie and Alien Resurrection on their directors. And now he keeps hinting that he wasn't in full control of the production of these first five eps...come on.
 
Posted by twinky (Member # 693) on :
 
So was Victor an Active all along, or was he nabbed and turned into an active after he started making inquiries about the Dollhouse?

I'm not sure. I lean toward the latter.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
I'm pretty certain that he was an active all along.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
It hadn't occurred to me that he might not have been an active all along, but now that you mention the possibility I find myself liking it.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
Besides the rantings of the guy that was caught during this last episode, have we seen any indication that the Dollhouse ever turns people into dolls without their consent?
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
We haven't, but it's the type of abuse that I would expect to see creep into he system, were that technology to exist in real life.
 
Posted by twinky (Member # 693) on :
 
Oh, I don't necessarily mean that he was co-opted into the Dollhouse against his will. When he started making inquiries, he might have been given a choice the same way that the rest of the Actives were. Remember, Victor said that if the Dollhouse existed, he'd sign up.
 
Posted by Elmer's Glue (Member # 9313) on :
 
I doubt that's how it happened. If it was I'd think they would have just shown us.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
I don't know if you've watched a lot of Whedon's stuff, but I've come to learn that unless there is clear and irrefutable evidence in front of me, I don't assume anything. And sometimes not even then (e.g. A few times in the Buffy opening credits, characters appeared that were clearly not intended to be main characters. They were there to make me think they were main characters, so when something latter happens to them, I'm extra flustered and flabbergasted.)

For example, in this last episode, when Topher was distracted by Echo's handler while he was creating her new personality, he was away from his computer and the disk for a few minutes. I had the suspicion that something was up. There was no real need for Topher to leave the room. And Lo! Echo had some extra programming!

So, since there's a whole lot about Victor that I haven't seen with my own eyes, I'm not willing to say anything about how or why he became an Active.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
And Lo! Echo had some extra programming!
Maybe she did. Maybe she didn't.
 
Posted by sarcasticmuppet (Member # 5035) on :
 
Indeed. I am about 80% certain that Topher wrote the message himself, and sent away his assistant to a mindless errand and bodily moved Boyd far away from his computer in order to keep either of them from seeing what he was doing.

The 20% doubt comes from the fact that Echo's message says the programmer didn't know about it, or something. Topher might have been hiding his tracks, but that opens it up for something different. Darn you, Joss!
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
OR, the "secret" message was false, and everybody involved (except for Helo) knew about it.
 
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
 
It was either Topher or his assistant.

It's clear that we're being led to suspect the assistant, but that alone is reason for me to suspect it'll actually end up being Topher.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
quote:
Remember, Victor said that if the Dollhouse existed, he'd sign up.
I think he was already an active when he said that; he said it in the scene immediately before he was wiped.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
It's clear that we're being led to suspect the assistant, but that alone is reason for me to suspect it'll actually end up being Topher.
Really? I went back and watched that scene more than once, and I don't think we're supposed to suspect anybody.

If I were to guess, I'd guess the head lady.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by El JT de Spang:
It was either Topher or his assistant.

It's clear that we're being led to suspect the assistant, but that alone is reason for me to suspect it'll actually end up being Topher.

But it's so simple. All you have to do is divine from what you know of Joss--is he the sort of writer who would put the responsibility for Echo's message into The Dollhouse's hands, or into its enemies?

Now, a clever writer would put the responsibility for the message into The Dollhouse's hands, because he would know that only a great fool would reach for the obvious answer. You are not a great fool, so you can clearly cannnot choose the Dollhouse as the responsible party. But Joss must have known you were not a great fool--he would have counted on it--so you can clearly not choose Alpha as the responsible party.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
Therefore I clearly cannot choose the wine in front of Noemon.
 
Posted by Elmer's Glue (Member # 9313) on :
 
Inconceivable!
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mr_porteiro_head:
Therefore I clearly cannot choose the wine in front of Noemon.

You've made your decision then?
 
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mr_porteiro_head:
quote:
It's clear that we're being led to suspect the assistant, but that alone is reason for me to suspect it'll actually end up being Topher.
Really? I went back and watched that scene more than once, and I don't think we're supposed to suspect anybody.

If I were to guess, I'd guess the head lady.

I'm basing that on the fact that we've only seen three people who have the skills to put together a wipe: Topher, the assistant, and Alpha. And I don't consider it likely that Alpha was able to access the drive inside the Dollhouse and modify it.

So that leaves Topher and the assistant. The assistant has been set up as a talented, but underused (and hence frustrated) member of the technical team. I also get the sense that she's a little more moral than Topher.

Additionally, Echo said that the extra stuff was done without the programmer's awareness. I'm assuming she was telling the truth, because if it was Topher there's no need to smokescreen Ballard like that. He has no clue who the programmer is.

Finally, I'm pretty sure Topher's a True Believer and not likely to want to bring the whole thing crashing down.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by El JT de Spang:
[QB]I'm basing that on the fact that we've only seen three people who have the skills to put together a wipe: Topher, the assistant, and Alpha. And I don't consider it likely that Alpha was able to access the drive inside the Dollhouse and modify it.

I could believe that Alpha has their network hacked, and can exploit their system in such a way as to edit the personality engram remotely. I could also believe that the assistant is actually Alpha's creature (as I suspect the guy who went Most Dangerous Game on Echo in an early episode was).

It's possible that it isn't Alpha, though, but some other third party. We're being led to believe that it's Alpha, I think, but that doesn't necessarily mean that it is.
 
Posted by Damien.m (Member # 8462) on :
 
Im pretty sure it wasnt Topher. When he puts the disk into the slot and Boyd calls him outside the shot lingers on the door beside his desk for a moment and its closed. When he comes back though its open.
 
Posted by Alcon (Member # 6645) on :
 
quote:
Im pretty sure it wasnt Topher. When he puts the disk into the slot and Boyd calls him outside the shot lingers on the door beside his desk for a moment and its closed. When he comes back though its open.
I didn't notice that I'll have to watch it again. I was sure when Topher got called away that someone had done something to the disk. I was expecting it to be gone, but when it was still there I wondered if someone had messed with it. I was not expecting that to be the modification though.

I'd be willing to go with Topher sticking it in, it seems almost too obvious for Joss. Though I think we who know Joss may be over thinking this...
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Damien.m:
Im pretty sure it wasnt Topher. When he puts the disk into the slot and Boyd calls him outside the shot lingers on the door beside his desk for a moment and its closed. When he comes back though its open.

Good catch. There's also ominous music at that same point.

I'm not convinced it's his assistant though.
 
Posted by Sterling (Member # 8096) on :
 
The most recent episode was the first that seemed to belong to a show that was definitely worth the time investment. I hope it's not an anomaly.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The White Whale:
quote:
Originally posted by Damien.m:
Im pretty sure it wasnt Topher. When he puts the disk into the slot and Boyd calls him outside the shot lingers on the door beside his desk for a moment and its closed. When he comes back though its open.

Good catch. There's also ominous music at that same point.

Keep in mind that this is Joss we're talking about. He specifically enjoys using signals that have become nearly universal in film to lead his audience off track. An example from Firefly (minor spoiler from the pilot here) would be his shot of Kaylee's hand falling, limp, when she's lying in the bed in the medical bay. That type of shot is usually used to signal that someone has died, and Joss uses it to create a belief on his audience's part that Kaylee has done just that. Because of that, we don't even stop to consider the possibility that Mal is lying when he tells Simon that she's dead. We've seen enough of the characters to begin to become attached to them at this point, so when we're watching Simon make his way to the medical bay at a dead run we share in some bit of what he's feeling. And when the shot cuts from Kaylee in bed, perfectly fine, to Mal and the rest of the crew laughing, in a way we're being laughed at. Joss loves confounding expectations. Given that, a lingering shot and ominous music don't necessarily mean anything. You could be right in thinking that it means what it does, but it could easily be a setup on Joss's part. I suspect that it is.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Noemon:
Given that, a lingering shot and ominous music don't necessarily mean anything.

No, but a door being closed in an supposedly empty office and then moments later being open certainly means something. I'm sure it wasn't a blooper.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
I agree that that does increase the likelihood of it being someone other than Topher (and good catch with that one, by the way, Damien). I'm definitely going to be having a lot of fun trying to figure it out.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Damien.m:
Im pretty sure it wasnt Topher. When he puts the disk into the slot and Boyd calls him outside the shot lingers on the door beside his desk for a moment and its closed. When he comes back though its open.

Woah. It took me a while to find that, but yeah, you're right.

I never would have noticed that on my own.
 
Posted by Eaquae Legit (Member # 3063) on :
 
This was the first episode where I could understand paying an obscene amount of money for a programmable person. The other assignments seemed like they'd be cheaper to just hire a real person. But this one, I can understand.

Good ep. I enjoyed the first five more than most people, apparently, but this one felt like Joss.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
This was the first episode where I could understand paying an obscene amount of money for a programmable person.
How so?
 
Posted by Christine (Member # 8594) on :
 
Some of the assignments were iffy, but not all. I definitely failed to understand why you'd pay a lot of money for a programmable midwife/labor coach, but that's the only one that really struck me as a HUH?
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
A blogger I read concludes a review of "Man on the Street" by suggesting the show would have been less absurd if it was set in a future in which Dollhouse technology is common and accepted.

What I find problematic is that apparently a lot of people know about the Dollhouse. What's to stop any of them from ratting them out?

Maybe customers of the Dollhouse have to accept mental protocols that makes tattling impossible?
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
And how does the Dollhouse exactly acquire expert/top notch personalities?
 
Posted by Darth_Mauve (Member # 4709) on :
 
There may be one other person capable of programing the disk.

Echo.

What do we know of Echo?

She wants to help the world.
She has a connection to the boss lady hinted at during the very first scene of the first show.
She has the ability to remember some things from her wipes--like the gesture from the Dangerous Game guy.
Alpha has a special purpose and interest in her.
She alone of all the actives was bypassed by Alpha's rampage.

We believe that the root personality that is left from the wipe is the doll personality. On top of that personality others are placed. But what if echo had herself layered so that underneath the root personality is a real, or at least another spy personality. It is a sleeper like from this episode.

When activated she does things like building a cell, reporting that a certain doll cries at night, etc.

This sleeper also gives her extra skills she uses to complete her missions safely, and allows her to remember some of her missions.

So she remembers that agent x tried to kill her, and the next episode agent x is killed. She gets her way.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
Hm. That's an interesting idea, Dan.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
So she remembers that agent x tried to kill her, and the next episode agent x is killed. She gets her way.
When did he try to kill her? I remember blond security guy trying to kill her (in the dumbest way possible), but how did the guy that died to that?
 
Posted by Goody Scrivener (Member # 6742) on :
 
Ya know, there's something seriously twisted when we've got Dollhouse/Princess Bride crossovers going on... [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Risuena (Member # 2924) on :
 
Inconceivable!
 
Posted by dabbler (Member # 6443) on :
 
quote:
We believe that the root personality that is left from the wipe is the doll personality. On top of that personality others are placed. But what if echo had herself layered so that underneath the root personality is a real, or at least another spy personality. It is a sleeper like from this episode.
And sometimes there is a third, even deeper layer, and that one is the same as the top, surface one. Like with pie.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
Or onions.
 
Posted by Glenn Arnold (Member # 3192) on :
 
Parfait
 
Posted by Goody Scrivener (Member # 6742) on :
 
Gah. Now I hear Donkey. Vizzini was better.
 
Posted by scholarette (Member # 11540) on :
 
The doll that is dating the agent brought up a question for me. For a long term assignment, wouldn't the agent become less predictable? The experiences the woman has will change her. So, right now, she loves the agent, but what about if he does x? Dolls have programmed personalities, but they can still make decisions. The longer they are away, the more those decisions could differ from the plan.
 
Posted by Miro (Member # 1178) on :
 
They could bring her back to the Dollhouse periodically for updates/adjustments.
 
Posted by Vadon (Member # 4561) on :
 
Still, didn't one of the Dollhouse staff get angry because Victor was being re-imprinted with the same identity again and again?

It seems like the updates/adjustments would be problematic too.
 
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
 
My guess is Millie is actually Millie -- the Dollhouse merely imprinted her with triggerable combat skills and stuff like that. But unless she's activated she's herself, and thus not at risk.
 
Posted by scholarette (Member # 11540) on :
 
Well, hopefully they will answer these questions eventually. The last episode was much better then the earlier ones, so maybe there is reason to hope. The first ones were watchable, but the 6th was just so much better. I would have made that one the first episode personally.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
But didn't a lot of the twists depend on some of the knowledge of the characters that the first five episodes gave? Like Millie/Ballard, Boyd's concern for Echo, and the Echo/Victor/Sierra dynamic?

I'd like to hear someone who hasn't seen any episodes thinks of the sixth.
 
Posted by Noemon (Member # 1115) on :
 
I've asked a couple of friends who haven't seen episodes 1-5 to give episode 6 a try. If either of them do so, I'll let you know what they thought of it.
 
Posted by dabbler (Member # 6443) on :
 
Actually I watched episode 6 as my first b/c of how hulu organizes them. It felt pretty whirlwind. The tv segments made it feel like a pilot ep. I was wondering why agent Ballard was telling his neighbor all that (still am). I got teary listening to the Internet guy's story. It did work as a first episode, though.
 
Posted by Alcon (Member # 6645) on :
 
So what did people think of last nights episode? I just got a chance to watch it on Hulu now. I'm still processing it, right now my only clear thought is that: Joss is baaackkk! [Smile]
 
Posted by scholarette (Member # 11540) on :
 
My main thought was from the next week episode- that seems way, way too fast. I hope there is more to Echo's story then what we have seen.
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
That's exactly what I thought! The episode was interesting, and I was pleased that they got the new guy for the Dollhouse, but yeah, Echo's backstory wasn't very substantial.
 
Posted by MrSquicky (Member # 1802) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Alcon:
So what did people think of last nights episode? I just got a chance to watch it on Hulu now. I'm still processing it, right now my only clear thought is that: Joss is baaackkk! [Smile]

Seriously?

I thought it was a trainwreck. Unbelievable and poorly constructed through and through. The flashbacks were horribly written and acted. It made no sense for them to be presented the way they were.

Echo's character made no sense. The guy going along with her made no sense. The dialog was unbelievable and them thinking that the drug wouldn't affect the actives was incredibly dumb. Heck, having Topher as their go to guy was incredibly dumb.

I thought it was an awkward, poorly written and plotted episode with (with some exceptions, Victor and Boyd for example) some very flat acting.

To me, it was the worst episode so far and the only reason I sat through the first 4 was because of Joss.
 
Posted by MrSquicky (Member # 1802) on :
 
So far, I thought episode 5 was very good, but the best I can say for the show is that it got me watching the immensely better Pretender on hulu.
 
Posted by Dogbreath (Member # 11879) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MrSquicky:
So far, I thought episode 5 was very good, but the best I can say for the show is that it got me watching the immensely better Pretender on hulu.

I don't know if you saw my post earlier in this thread, but it's my opinion that Dollhouse is pretty much a dumbed-down, heartless version of the Pretender.

I mean, the Pretender does suffer from numerous mid-90s tv cliches (though they were considered "cutting edge" back then, and we only think of them as cliches because they've been used to death since), but it's much smarter and uses real psychology to create their pretender.

In the Pretender, every episode you get to see clips of Sydney conditioning Jared with years of simulations, you get to see Jared speed-reading textbooks and conditioning himself for each profession, and everything is completely conceivable. In fact, the heart of the show is about what makes us who we are, why we define ourselves by profession, personality, family, etc.

In Dollhouse they just "program" their actives with a funny brain zapper device and never bother to explain any of it except with made up techno babble.

Also, the Pretender had a heart. Even the most vile, evil characters (see Mr. Reins) are given depth, and you can even sympathize with them. Except for Echo's protector, all of the Dollhouse seem to be pretty shallow, evil people with NO real complexity, or even outside relationships, apparently. (that's one thing the Pretender did well - everyone had a family and social life outside of the Centre, and sometimes they'd mingle. See Broots and his daughter, for example)
 
Posted by MrSquicky (Member # 1802) on :
 
quote:
In fact, the heart of the show is about what makes us who we are, why we define ourselves by profession, personality, family, etc.
This is one of the bits that I felt is really lacking from Dollhouse. It's supposed to be about identity, but this isn't really in the show at all. There's no exploration of this, even among the Actives, let alone the people outside them. It's all about the techo-babble zapping.


For example, Echo's part in this last story. She was supposed to be zapped with this somewhat reserved (but still sexy dressed...she must always be wearing something sexy) personality who then gets bleed through from Caroline. The way I would have written this is to have her as a reserved, passive person who has something like a post-hypnotic impulse. She feels really driven towards this goal, but the goal and even the feeling are alien to her.

Instead, they went with her no longer having any discernible personality and have her make plot important semi-amnesiatic statements that are accepted without any sort of realistic reaction by the personality-less uncharacter she runs into. You can't explore identity when you are working with walking, talking plot points instead of people.
 
Posted by Alcon (Member # 6645) on :
 
quote:

- posted March 28, 2009 01:14 PM Profile for MrSquicky Email MrSquicky Edit/Delete Post Reply With Quote

quote:Originally posted by Alcon:
So what did people think of last nights episode? I just got a chance to watch it on Hulu now. I'm still processing it, right now my only clear thought is that: Joss is baaackkk! [Smile]

Seriously?

I thought it was a trainwreck. Unbelievable and poorly constructed through and through. The flashbacks were horribly written and acted. It made no sense for them to be presented the way they were.

Yes, seriously. It wasn't perfect. But it was Joss. The dialog, the pacing, the little teasers and hints and the misdirection. It was Joss.

I, also, completely disagree with you that it was poorly acted, written or plotted. And I think Dollhouse has a heart more and more. We're getting hints of motives other than profit behind the Dollhouse, and it's leaders. The characters at the top aren't just flat evil, as we've seen this episode. If any of it seemed forced, it may have been because Joss had to undo some of the damage done when control was taken from him. Also that wasn't all their was to Echo's backstory. Ms. Dewitt said they'd been dancing this dance for two years. That was just the beginning of the dance. We still have two more years of Echo being at war with the Dollhouse to learn about.

Also what is the research they are doing that apparently the Dollhouse is funding? I don't think you were watching the episode closely enough, and I think you'd already decided to hate it before you watched. If you've already decided you don't buy a plot or character before you watch something then of course it's going to seem full of holes and like flat acting.
 
Posted by Christine (Member # 8594) on :
 
I just finished watching last night's episode -- worst so far. It was confusing, poorly acted, poorly written....the flashbacks were terrible and I still can't honestly say I get who Caroline was and why she agreed to become a doll. What made her think the company was evil? She just kept saying they were evil but with no cause. They could have done MUCH better with that...it was something I was very curious about from the beginning and they flubbed it big time.

The drug was a joke and I don't think a single actor really pulled off being high on it. They just acted silly.

I sure hope last night's episode was a fluke, but unfortunately it's a fluke that included a bit of back story they can't take back now.
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
How does Echo catch Sam in the open? Sam is 6'3", built like a lion in sneakers, and Echo is wearing impossible shoes. I think I hate the shoes the most. I'm tired of chick spies in heels. She is supposed to be like a "ninja" wearing a pair of clacky pumps. It's a joke. Ms. Dewitt is probably the only reason I'm still watching the show. I want something to overtly happen between her and the security chief, or even something crazy to happen like we find out that she is a doll and he is her handler. They have decent chemistry. I like it when the Victor is made to act Russian. It's funny, and maybe I want to see some of Caroline in her two years as domestic terrorist against Rossum, and Alpha. I want my Reaver, and I want to know why he didn't kill Amy Acker's character, and most of all, I expect sensible shoes in all action scenes.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
No, she was supposed to be a tarted-up "innocent" girl in lace stockings and pumps that could be taught to be naughty by the client. She went off on her own, against programming (but still in the outfit) to raid the lab, and didn't have a pair of sneaks handy. Doesn't explain how she managed to catch Sam, though, since she was staggering along and he was presumably fit. I assumed he was trying to go slow and play it cool so as not to draw attention to himself as he walked out of the heavily guarded building they just snuck into.

I was much more bothered by how she pointed at the red pipe in the tunnel and stressed how they followed that, and then turned to the left and there was the ladder they needed. Good thing that red pipe was there! They'd have been stumbling around that 8 feet of tunnel for hours!

What I liked about the show: most of it. I liked getting some backstory, and don't mind that she was raging against the company without real reason (although, knowing Joss, she probably has some sort of connection to the company like her parents are involved or something and doesn't want to admit it). Honestly, she sounded like some of the more clueless activists I've known, mad at the big companies for being, essentially, big companies. But I'll bet she learned a lot more about them in those missing two years.

I liked finally seeing something besides stiff Brit coming from Adele (whom I've had very little reason to like until now), and Dominic's apology surprised me. I liked finding out which regulars were actives and which weren't (although the doctor wasn't around, so we still don't know for sure about her). I liked the little glimpse of what I think Victor was before his dollness; would an Active be sent to the war? Or was that what he was before, and did something horrible happen there that he wanted to forget? And I liked the piano.

And I've seen a screener of next week's episode, and... whouf. We're well away from the "job of the week" episodes.
 
Posted by Jeorge (Member # 11524) on :
 
Mostly, I just thought this episode was silly. And, since I was fairly tired when I watched it, it didn't do a very good job of keeping me awake.

I'm still debating whether I'm going to re-watch it to pick up anything I missed. I probably won't.
 
Posted by Olivet (Member # 1104) on :
 
I watched this one on my own, because after the last episode my spouse said, "I have a negative interest in watching more of it, which means I wish I could go back and forget I ever watched any of it."

*sigh*

I actually kind of enjoyed this ep, though. I've given up on ever caring about Caroline as a person distinct from Echo, though. It was just fun to watch people act silly and drunk.

This show is doomed, isn't it?
 
Posted by Shigosei (Member # 3831) on :
 
Seems like it. The sad thing is that I wouldn't actually be that disappointed. Oh well.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
quote:
This show is doomed, isn't it?
If you had accepted since the beginning the fact that it was doomed because (1) Joss was involved with it, and (2) it aired on FOX's "Friday night death slot", it's much easier to bear.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
But if Joss' shows were canceled based on the first half of a season, we wouldn't have Buffy of Angel. And both Buffy and Angel got better in the second season and beyond.

And yes, I'm quite aware of the Firefly Exception.
 
Posted by sylvrdragon (Member # 3332) on :
 
Did anyone else find it disconcerting how Echo didn't take the vial of Green Stuff from Sam's bag after Boyd came to get her? Instead, they (presumably) left him lying there on a ground to do whatever he pleased with the vial once he got back up. I don't know; maybe they rounded him up directly after that and just didn't feel the need to show it. I suppose one could say that him being interviewed to be a Doll was a sign that he had given up, but I don't like that there was no closure on that missing Vial.

Truth be told, I haven't been impressed by ANYONE'S acting in this show so far, least of all the woman that plays Echo (Amy Ackler I think I heard?). Well... I suppose I like Ballard, but that's probably bias left over from BSG.

I was just a tad disappointed to find out that Dewitt and Topher weren't actives. A big huge conspiracy world where you suspect people at every level seems much more interesting at a glance. I suppose it isn't yet out of reach though. I'll keep my fingers crossed.

This episode reminded me again of why I hate activists and hippies. To quote a friend of mine: "I would condone the killing of every puppy, kitten and baby rabbit born this month if it meant that this aspirin got rid of my headache one minute faster." I don't respect people who humanize animals... If Caroline's missing two years don't involve a reality check at some point, then I will personally be rooting for the Dollhouse and their conspiracy over her getting her personality back a second before her five year contract is up.
 
Posted by dantesparadigm (Member # 8756) on :
 
They were testing on babies too, that's kind of pushing it.
 
Posted by Shigosei (Member # 3831) on :
 
It hit me that the "saving minds" in the Rossum ad probably isn't curing disorders. It means backing stuff up to a hard drive. [Wink]

They probably have a resurrection ship in orbit.
 
Posted by Corwin (Member # 5705) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by dantesparadigm:
They were testing on babies too, that's kind of pushing it.

Yeap, they were, but Caroline's outrage was towards animal testing. Blind luck made it that her "theory" ("if they're doing this on animals, who knows what else they're doing") proved true with this particular company, but it's a leap of reasoning based on nothing. Yes, they're evil, but Caroline was quite dumb too. In a way, I'm ok with this; having a "hero activist" turned into a doll would have seemed too much like a movie plot; a silly girl turned into a doll works just fine in "reality", although I expect that when she snaps out of it she'll feel even more righteous about stopping all animal testing. [Roll Eyes] I'd like the series to show that part too. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by MrSquicky (Member # 1802) on :
 
quote:
Blind luck
Blind luck and people who not only don't shut down or password protect their computers, but also leave their "Hey, we're testing stuff on babies!!!" screen saver running.
 
Posted by MrSquicky (Member # 1802) on :
 
syl,
Don't you bad mouth Amy Acker. Amy Acker is doing a great job as the doctor. I think she'd be doing even more for the show as Echo, but that role went to Elisa Dushku.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
It it not make much sense that the drug thief, while he was recovering from being all doped up, was talking about conspiracy theories with Echo about the Big Bad Corp testing on people? He knew exactly what was going on, but why lie to Echo, a random tripping gal?
 
Posted by The Pixiest (Member # 1863) on :
 
Ooo Amy Acker WOULD have made a better Echo! Too bad it was Elisa's project.

And yeah, "She's a good person because she cares about animals" trope annoys the hell out of me too.

Maybe, when Echo wakes up, she'll realize her life would have been better spent fighting for humans rather than little balls of fur that poop where they eat.

BTW, do you think they're going to find a safe full of their old memories? Are they going to be willing to imprint themselves with their old personalities, even though that would mean the death of who they are now?
 
Posted by School4ever (Member # 5575) on :
 
I still can't see that Eliza Dushku is playing different characters. At most I see two: doll (religious fanatic, innocent girl) and tough girl.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
I agree.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
She did an excellent Buffy when she switched bodies with her. I thought she did a much better Buffy than SMG did Faith.

That said, I hate the animal nut thing. It makes me glad that she got caught, which I'm sure wasn't Joss's intention.
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
I seem to see this show slightly differently from how many people seem to be seeing it.

For me, Caroline is mostly dead. It is Echo I care about and there is, in my opinion, a distinct Echo-personality, just as there is a Sierra and a Victor. They may be being used but as an outsider I can have the same empathy for them that Boyd and Claire and even Topher and the Leader Lady have.

My opinion of Caroline is not that she was supposed to be some sort of heroine we're going to go back to; that's not the point of the animals. Echo is the heroine. Caroline is, a bit like Buffy, someone who--through some mild talents--ended up mixed up in something huge. The point of the animals is to show us partly who Caroline was. There are people who empathize with non-human creatures to an extent to call the people who work on them to call them evil. It was her boyfriend who really was interested in the true evil. I think Caroline is supposed to have been a reasonably ordinary, happy, quite shallow but intelligent and caring person. She becomes the bitter, dark person we saw at the very beginning of the series over the two years in which the Rossum corporation is chasing her.

The lab animals thing plays into this. Caroline had empathy for caged animals being used, and that is precisely what she is. I guess if you have difficulty feeling empathy for non-human animals you might have difficulty feeling empathy for the dolls because they are not human either, really. Or they as human as babies are.

Despite this, it is with the dolls that my sympathy lies and I have no problem following Echo from week to week whether she remembers herself or not. I'm not constantly searching for Caroline in her, it's Echo that I'm interested in. And no, Dushku isn't the best actress, but I don't dislike her.

I'm also okay with the show having less conspiracy theories than Lost. I like that people are people, rather than everyone being some crazy secret. I like that things are mostly what they seem.

That said, the show doesn't quite hang together and it's likely partly because the first five episodes seemed to be on a completely different wavelength. The relationship between Boyd and Millie just kind of suddenly appeared, whereas obviously it was supposed to be always plausible.

Basically, what Chris B. said.
 
Posted by Glenn Arnold (Member # 3192) on :
 
quote:
"I would condone the killing of every puppy, kitten and baby rabbit born this month if it meant that this aspirin got rid of my headache one minute faster."
Boy, no flies on you! When animals are subjected to intense pain and blindness so your mascara can make your eyelashes that much more luscious, they deserve protection. And if you really believe your friends statement, you don't.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
Actually, I like that quote. A lot.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Seriously? Wow.
 
Posted by dantesparadigm (Member # 8756) on :
 
I'm as anti-logic-free-environmentalism as the next conservative attendee a liberal ivy league, but I'd deal with a one minute migraine if it meant a cute little bunny's life. Especially if it was my bunny's.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
You you think there's any moral difference between killing cute little bunnies to alleviate hunger (which I do) and killing them to alleviate pain?
 
Posted by dantesparadigm (Member # 8756) on :
 
Yes.
 
Posted by scholarette (Member # 11540) on :
 
I am ok with drug testing, but not mascara. Looking pretty isn't worth a bunny's life, but being migraine free, that's worth several bunnies. A normal headache may or may not be worth it.
 
Posted by dantesparadigm (Member # 8756) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by dantesparadigm:
Yes.

Edit: I suppose it doesn't help to be terse. I can accept medical testing on animals. I'm not going to put an animal's life before a human's, whether that means killing it for food or in order to cure disease. What I do demand is ethics, that animals not be killed needlessly. If you are killing rabbits for fun, that is not a purposeful act, and the net result is negative. If animals are being tested on and the result isn't a moral positive, say cosmetics or ED meds, then there is a net negative.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I'm actually not THAT opposed to killing a few bunnies (or less cute creatureS) to produce better medicine so long as it was done humanely. In fact, that would be far more ethical than the hideous way most food is created. However, Caroline was worried specifically about cruel treatment, not killing, so I'd say it was still a valid criticism.

That said, I think it's pretty stupid to be worrying about one company doing medical tests when there's the entire factory farm industry out there. If the show was about Caroline as she was depicted last episode, I wouldn't be watching it. I hope we find out that she had better reasons than that, or we get a flashback where someone points out how silly she was.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
How and why do you think it's different?

Also, does it make any difference when you take into account the fact that I, along with the vast majority of non-vegetarian Americans, eat quite a bit more meat than my body needs? In a sense, I didn't really kill that bunny to alleviate hunger -- I did it to gain pleasure.

Of course, the main differences between that and any meal with chicken or beef is that I killed the animal I ate directly instead of paying somebody else to do it, and the animal I killed was cute.
 
Posted by Eaquae Legit (Member # 3063) on :
 
If something requiring rabbits made my migraines go away, I would support it in a heartbeat. (Barring the improbable result that they'd go extinct, but I don't think that's a serious danger for rabbits.) I don't buy cosmetics tested on animals, because I don't believe testing is necessary. I'm a vegetarian, as well, though moral reasons aren't my main motivation in that.

But medical testing? As long as the animals are kept as humanely as possible, I'm okay with that.
 
Posted by The Pixiest (Member # 1863) on :
 
"They say he saved her life. They say she works with the homeless and doesn't eat meat."

I have a problem with her.

This is a pattern with Joss. He really does seem to equate animal rights with "goodness." It's not *just* a metaphore for the cage of the dollhouse.

I still love his work though...

"This is his hair..."
 
Posted by Teshi (Member # 5024) on :
 
No, it's not just a metaphor. Clearly, Joss Whedon is one of these people who has empathy for animals.

I'm a meat eater and I don't mind testing done on animals, but I feel empathy for a lot of creatures and even non-creatures so it's not a mental leap for me to understand someone wanting to set test animals free.
 
Posted by sylvrdragon (Member # 3332) on :
 
Wow, Epic derail.

The topic is far too complex to outline in a single post (at least, if I intend to put it into proper context, which I always at least TRY to do), and besides that, I didn't intend to derail this thread so far. I should really learn to better rein in my Rants, lol.

quote:
Don't you bad mouth Amy Acker. Amy Acker is doing a great job as the doctor. I think she'd be doing even more for the show as Echo, but that role went to Elisa Dushku.
I'm not good with names. I meant Elisa Dushku. Doc seems pretty good by my standards so far.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
I'm glad that Amy Acker isn't (or at least doesn't seem, it's hard to tell under the lab jacket) as skinny as she was in Angel. In Buffy, I loved any episode with Alyson Hannigan because first, she's beautiful, and second, I liked her character. In Angel, I love any episode with Fred because she's beautiful (but too skinny!) and I like her character.

Now in Dollhouse, she's still beautiful, I like her new character, AND she's not shockingly skinny.

Also, I just watched the Angel episode where Willow comes to save the day. An episode with Willow and Fred!? Awesome.
 
Posted by FlyingCow (Member # 2150) on :
 
Episode 6 took the show to a different level... but I don't think Episode 7 really lived up to it. Episode 8 tried harder, but I still don't think I've found the show's "soul" so to speak.

I'm starting to get attached to some characters... but those are Victor, Sierra, and Mellie more than anyone else. Probably the doctor and the fbi agent are the next two on the list.

I just can't bring myself to care as much about Echo, Boyd, Topher, the head of security, or the head of the dollhouse.

I'm reminded of early seasons of Buffy, I think. I didn't care about Buffy at all... and I didn't care much about Angel, either (until later). Even in Angel, I cared more about Fred, Gunn, Spike and Wesley than I ever did about Angel, Cordelia, or Connor.

I wonder if Joss just doesn't write main characters well. In Firefly, the main character was the ship, really, so that allowed everyone to be support - which is probably why it was his best show.
 
Posted by Corwin (Member # 5705) on :
 
One thing to ponder from the current episode: Boyd says: "Echo, she wanted to free us all". Interesting wording. I still don't understand Boyd's motivation for doing what he does though, unless he's really the cover agent trying to bring this thing down. In which case he's waaay too obvious; although not to the Dollhouse bosses, it seems...
 
Posted by FlyingCow (Member # 2150) on :
 
Part of the problem is that I don't see what a lot of them are doing.

Sierra's story is the most compelling, right now - she turned a guy down, and he used his power and influence to get her into the Dollhouse, where he could have her whenever he wanted. That's pretty f'ed up.

Victor is also somewhat interesting, as it looks like he is former military.

Echo's story as a PETA chick who wants to take down a corporation just doesn't carry much weight.

With Wolfram & Hart, you always got the impression that there were far greater powers at work... and they were referenced regularly. The operatives Angel, et al, dealt with were always smaller pieces of the puzzle. I think I need to see more of that... more "these people are scary, and this is why".

I mean I want to see a Wolfram & Hart or Blue Sun emerge, but it just hasn't happened yet.

I think I need to see Echo/Caroline escape and find Ballard - and then have the Dollhouse actives become the "bad guys" that are after them. I need deeper purpose, I think.
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
The problem may be in the casting. I don't think Dushku has the chops for the part, and she may be bringing everyone down. The scripts are mediocre, in my opinion, but the idea and the plotting are fine. I don't think the idea is any better or worse than Lost, but the actors in Lost are far superior. Every time Dushku opens her mouth, I hear "whiny chick." If the women who play Sun or Juliet or even Kate or Cassidy were substituted in, the show would be much, much better. Marguerite Moreau would have made and excellent Echo. The people holding up the show are the women playing DeWitt and Amy Acker. Ballard isn't bad, but not great either. The same can be said of Victor. The Handler is so so, but emotionally forgettable. By now, I should care why he quit the force, but I don't.

[ April 05, 2009, 04:39 PM: Message edited by: Irami Osei-Frimpong ]
 
Posted by FlyingCow (Member # 2150) on :
 
I'd throw Sierra in there, too. She is very good, and seems to be quite versatile.

I don't think Dushku is that great, myself, but a better actress would still ahve to compete with a poorly written main character (imo).

It keeps looking like it's going to give me more... but ends up giving me just short of what I want.

I think they need to show me why the Dollhouse is so evil. Echo's jobs have been so very, very tame... when I'd imagine there are plenty of sickos out there like the guy who put Sierra in the dollhouse. I think we need to see more of that to make us more sympathetic to the actives.

And then, we need to be shown either a) that the people working in the Dollhouse are equally evil, or b) why we should have any sympathy for their part in a human slave trade.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I think the point is that what makes the Dollhouse "evil" is something inherent in the process, and that the people who work there are exactly as human as anyone else. You don't need to be a monster to be complicit in a bad job.

I thought the episode started out with some bad dialogue but got better. By the time it ended I thought it was pretty good.
 
Posted by FlyingCow (Member # 2150) on :
 
"You don't need to be a monster to be complicit in a bad job."

You're right. But "people in a bad job" just isn't as compelling.

Like I said, I want Wolfram & Hart. I want Blue Sun. Joss knows how to write scary, evil nigh-omnipotent companies. He just isn't doing that here. There are hints, but it's just not there.

Closest we got was the confrontation with Sierra and Nolan, where the darker side of what the Dollhouse does came out a bit more.

It's not all midwifery and dates for lonely billionaires (even perfect dates that end up like "Most Dangerous Game"... which we later saw was not sanctioned by the Dollhouse) - there's real darkness there. Human slavery, deviant sexual acts, pyschological darkness on the part of the "customers", etc.

That needs to come out more.
 
Posted by JennaDean (Member # 8816) on :
 
I'm a couple weeks behind, so I'm trying not to spoil myself and haven't read all the comments. But we just watched Man on the Street, and I was really disappointed to find out that the neighbor girl was an active. My husband had just finished saying he had a feeling she was one of them, and I had argued that I didn't think she was - and hoped she wasn't - because what this show needs is one ordinary person, someone who isn't connected with the dollhouse in any way. And then came the lovely little scene with the answering machine.

<sigh>

I will agree with FlyingCow - hubby and I were just discussing how we were starting to actually have some sympathy for and care about the actives, but somehow it's really only for Victor and Sierra. There's still nothing really there to care about in Echo.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
I've liked most of the episodes so far, and have liked most of the character development I've seen. I may not care so much about some of the characters, but I am curious to see more of the why and how Topher, Boyd, Adelle, and Claire wound up in the Dollhouse. I'm hoping that Joss has some backstory for them, because it seems like Boyd and Claire don't really want to be in the Dollhouse. Adelle I'm sure has her reasons, and Topher might just have the backstory of the genius scientist guy who follows wherever his ability gets him, but I'm hoping it is much more than that.

I liked this week's episode. There weren't any gigantic loose ends, all of the characters seemed to be consistent with their characterizations so far, and I thought in general it was a compelling story. I'm falling in love with Amy Acker again. She seems to be the most compassionate character so far, and it was interesting to hear her tell Caroline that "they're watching" and "I'm not your friend in here, Echo. I'm sorry, I can't help you." And then she proceeds to 'help' Mike, the fifth active.

quote:
...there's real darkness there
I agree. There are a lot of moral issues with the Dollhouse that Topher, Adelle, Boyd, and the other operators need to have rationalizations for. Do they really believe that they are doing good works? Or have they also been coerced into taking this job? There's also the whole issue with Alpha (and I'm exited about how Alan Tudyk plays the character).

So I'm looking forward every Friday (well, Saturdays with Hulu) to watching the show. I hope they don't cancel it, being that it is one of the only interesting (and original) shows on television.
 
Posted by scholarette (Member # 11540) on :
 
Echo hasn't really connected with me, but I like Sierra and Victor as well as the dr. But I am still willing to keep watching.
 
Posted by Shanna (Member # 7900) on :
 
The ending tonight makes me like Caroline's character alittle more. I mean, I hate the person she is, but I feel like Joss has some sort of hand on her. I don't think Caroline is someone we should want to cheer on. She's a stupid, stupid girl. Here she was wanting to lead a bunch of brain-wiped "children" out into the big bad world. She's like the worst PETA person ever. Like the idiots at the beginning of "28 Days Later." No matter how cute the lab monkey is, don't go opening the cage door and let it run free.

And yet, I'm still not really caring about Echo/Caroline. I like everyone else BUT her. Ballard used to annoy me but he's growing on me. I really liked Boyd and wish they'd do more with him, but I expect they will later.

Topher is still the highlight for me with Victor and DeWitt tied for second.
 
Posted by FlyingCow (Member # 2150) on :
 
I had an interesting thought, that likely won't happen, but...

Imagine if Ballard finds Echo on an engagement, and somehow manages to get her away from Boyd. He breaks through enough for her to get another couple of snippets of her memory, and follows him.

Ballard and Echo go on the run from the Dollhouse, Boyd ends up getting "suspended" and strikes out on his own to find them, and the Dollhouse itself mobilizes to track them down - turning our "sympathetic" actives into the enemy.

Alpha makes contact, and they find there's an underground resistance, that they are trying to put together the loose ends and find the people behind the whole thing before going public... because otherwise those most responsible would disappear/escape.

It would be Ballard/Echo/Alpha and others "in the know" working against the Dollhouse's resources, with the actives caught in the middle... forced to attack the resistance, but the resistance doesn't want to hurt them back (but instead wants to co-opt them).

Just a thought.

I'm curious to see what actually happens, but I really want the Dollhouse to become a darker place.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
It's actually kind of fascinating. I mean, Tru Calling was far simpler. Sometimes I like that. But I'm actually really curious to see what happens here. How things develop.

But yeah, Caroline is an idiot. She acts like a 19 year old, holier than thou, rebel without a clue.
 
Posted by Tarrsk (Member # 332) on :
 
I might be the only one, but I think that Caroline's PETA stance is supposed to come off as shockingly naive. Whedon is pretty open about his liberalism, but I never got the impression that he was particularly gung-ho about animal rights activism (although IIRC Dushku is a card-carrying PETA member). Up to this point, his "evil scientist" characters have always been shown as evil because of their experimentation on people. I think we're supposed to view Caroline as a well-meaning, but self-righteous (and terribly unpragmatic) young college student, of the personality type that commonly populates university campuses. She's the anti-Mal Reynolds: she believes too much in her cause. And her friends suffer for it.

Dr. Horrible spoilers below:

On a related note, I also remember reading at least one interview in which Joss stated that Penny's idealism in "Dr. Horrible" was supposed to be viewed as a flaw as much as a virtue - it's her belief in the fundamental goodness in everyone that gets her killed, after all. The "doesn't eat meat" bit served three purposes: a funny joke, establishment of the groupie characters as the jealous type, and further establishment of Penny as the blindly idealistic type who doesn't understand how the real world works.

End spoilers
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
I think we're supposed to view Caroline as a well-meaning, but self-righteous (and terribly unpragmatic) young college student
Minor correction, but she isn't a college student any more, is she?

"I spent four years partying in the shadow of that lab..."
 
Posted by Tarrsk (Member # 332) on :
 
Whoops, you're right. Make that "a well-meaning, but self-righteous (and terribly unpragmatic) young ex-college student."
 
Posted by swbarnes2 (Member # 10225) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Tarrsk:
I might be the only one, but I think that Caroline's PETA stance is supposed to come off as shockingly naive.

That was my thought too. She wants to take down the dollhouse, but right now, she's not ready. Her idea of letting everyone go without their memories was terrible. Right now, she is most useful as Alpha's tool. Maybe later on, she'll be ready to help as Caroline, and not just as a doll.

quote:
The "doesn't eat meat" bit served three purposes:
I didn't take that line literally. The whole point of the song is that "they say" she and Hammer are in a great relationship, but they aren't. He's a jerk, and she doesn't really like him that much. So maybe "they" added the vegetarian line because that's the story that people wanted to hear.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
Is it me or did the techie guy that Agent Helo took the recording device to look like Alan Tudyk?
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
quote:
Is it me or did the techie guy that Agent Helo took the recording device to look like Alan Tudyk?
I saw no resemblance.
 
Posted by Brinestone (Member # 5755) on :
 
I saw a resemblance, but it wasn't Tudyk.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
Checked the IMDB credits for the episode... Not him.

I saw him and he, at least in my eyes, resembled Tudyk if he gained a few pounds.

BTW: Tudyk's no longer listed in IMDB credits as Alpha. Not that it means much, but still.
 
Posted by TheGrimace (Member # 9178) on :
 
Nighthawk, I did a triple-take on the first couple seconds of him and thought the same thing. Once the camera actually focuses on him it's obvious that it's not Tudyk, but certainly bears some vague resemblence.
 
Posted by dantesparadigm (Member # 8756) on :
 
I thought the same thing. I'm a little disappointed it's not him.
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
I also thought that for a bit, even when he spoke.

Gah! Can't we just have Alan Tudyk already?! [Smile]
 
Posted by dabbler (Member # 6443) on :
 
quote:
Checked the IMDB credits for the episode... Not him.
I wouldn't use that as proof in a secretive series with secretive characters. In Twin Peaks one character had a fake name for several episodes in a row until it was revealed who this person was.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
In case you're not following Felicia Day on Twitter:

1) She is starring in Dollhouse's episode #13.

2) Fox is not going to air episode #13. It's apparently going to appear ONLY on the DVD. Episode #12 will be the season finale.

Still no official word on whether it'll continue to a 2nd season or not, but if Twitter's any indication it has already been cancelled.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
Tudyk is coming.

Dushku isn't a PETA member, as far as I know, and PETA took her to task months ago for going bowhunting and then rhapsodizing about it in interviews. Personally, I think making Caroline a passionate animal rights activist was an injoke.

While I may be grasping at straws, not airing ep. 13 doesn't automatically mean cancellation. It will be on the DVD set, which comes out after Comic Con, and is sort of a tone-setter for the second season. Ep. 12 is for all intents and purposes the finale of the 1st season, 13 is more of a coda. It is possible FOX plans to use it's release as an attention-getting ad for the next season.

Or not. We'll see.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
I know it doesn't mean immediate cancellation, there's lots of speculation:

- Show really is canceled.

- It's being saved as the Season 2 opener.

- A bonus to boost DVD sales, in an effort to match the DVD success of Firefly.


The announcement of Ep13 was echoed by Felicia Day and the Dr. Horrible Twitter accounts.

People are now Twittering me (Hey! I'm famous!) that it's been canceled; trying to confirm official sources.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
Here's a link with a forlorn looking Whedon on the set of Dollhouse.

Why so sad, Joss?

But it doesn't seem conclusive either way yet.
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
Oo, I liked today's episode so much. DeWitt is so creepy with her romance novel hero version of Victor - I need to rewatch the episode where they're talking about sending Victor to the Attic, to see how she's responding to the whole idea of him raping Sierra.

Also: It seems very, very convenient for Echo that the guy now in charge of all Dollhouse security feels very protective of her, and proud of her when she becomes self-aware. Can't help feeling like DeWitt's stacking the deck in Echo's favor here. It's always been clear that DeWitt struggles to act rationally where Echo is concerned.

The other night I had this extremely intricate dream in which Alan Tudyk showed up as Alpha and it was revealed that Echo was the person who's been messing with Topher's imprints, because Alpha had imprinted her to do that using his ghetto version of the imprint technology. I guess he didn't really have any opportunity to do that, but it would be nifty! Anyway, I'm dying to know who the real mole is.

I am ready for Alpha to show up!!!
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Fyfe:
I am ready for Alpha to show up!!!

This. A hundred times this. During every episode, I keep hoping that Alpha's lurking just off-camera, and one well-timed angle will reveal him.

I also liked tonight's episode - at one point, I blinked twice and asked myself when the show had become somewhat rad. There was a lot going on, and I stopped and actually watched tonight - DeWitt's thing with Victor, Echo's continued 'evolution'... all pretty interesting. The November reveal was awesome, though it's going to give me perpetual Boomer flashes. Perpetual, I say.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Between this and the Terminator finale, I'd say this was a pretty awesome Friday night. My roommate had given up on Dollhouse a few episodes ago but ended up watching out of boredom tonight, and now is ready to go back and catch up.
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
Carrie - Hahaha, I hadn't even thought of that, but you're so right! Poor Helo can never cut a break. [Razz]
 
Posted by twinky (Member # 693) on :
 
I really enjoyed this episode. It might be my favourite one, actually. I loved how the same scene was shot from multiple perspectives, giving us some new insight each time.
 
Posted by JennaDean (Member # 8816) on :
 
quote:
I loved how the same scene was shot from multiple perspectives, giving us some new insight each time.
Ooh, that sounded kind of Enderish. How appropriate. [Smile]
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
I liked this episode. Poor Ballard, being strung along and abused. I'm looking forward to seeing how he reacts and how his character continues to develop. I liked what they did with Adelle, showing some of her weakness and doubt, but, and please correct me if I'm wrong, being shot in the abdomen tends to be, well, painful and I image a crisis, yes? I could buy that she would suffer through it to see Mr. Dominic get wiped, but then the full conversation with Topher out in the hall afterward without so much as wincing was a little too much.

quote:
I loved how the same scene was shot from multiple perspectives, giving us some new insight each time.
It reminded me of 'Out of Gas' from Firefly, my favorite episode. I think it's the whole non-linear sequence of events that I like so much (when it's done well).
 
Posted by Glenn Arnold (Member # 3192) on :
 
quote:
please correct me if I'm wrong, being shot in the abdomen tends to be, well, painful and I image a crisis
I wondered about that at first, when I saw the shot hit the window with blood on it. But once she removed her blouse, it was obvious that it was just a grazing wound.
 
Posted by Amka (Member # 690) on :
 
When I saw the wound at the end it looked more like it was a graze, maybe going through some muscle.
 
Posted by TheGrimace (Member # 9178) on :
 
Really liked the episode, but have one major concern that maybe someone here has thoughts on:

-------------------------------------------------
SPOILERS
-------------------------------------------------


Assumption: Dominic is genuine about his claims that his efforts kept Ballard from finding them out.

Problems:
1) How has any of the re-programming of Actives done that? If anything it has only served to keep Ballard going. Unless it's just attempting to further discredit him and drive him insane, but that seems like a big stretch.

2) Why? I can potentially understand wanting to keep the technology from being brought to the public (i.e. inter-departmental rivalries etc). But why would the NSA think that the dollhouse was better off in the hands of some private corporation than either under their control or gone entirely? I can potentially put this aside and just accept that Dominic's assessment of the situation was that it was better to subtly influence things than to potentially bring a useful tool crashing down.

3) Was the re-programming that we have seen (Echo and November) actually the work of Dominic? Or is there still another player working here? Did someone else discover the chip and use it to their own ends? Are there other agents with alternate goals?

Basically Dominic's claims just didn't seem to mesh with the reprogramming that we've seen (at least in any way I can figure out) and I'm trying to figure out how that fits in with things.

The trouble is that they specifically mention that the chip is NSA tech and is used to change the Active's parameters... at least implying that Dominic was using that chip...
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
I'm quite sure that the chip was no doing of Dominic. My guess, of course, is Alpha.
 
Posted by swbarnes2 (Member # 10225) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by TheGrimace:

Problems:
2) Why? I can potentially understand wanting to keep the technology from being brought to the public (i.e. inter-departmental rivalries etc). But why would the NSA think that the dollhouse was better off in the hands of some private corporation than either under their control or gone entirely?

I don't think they do. I bet Dominic doesn't think it's a good idea for actives to be running around in public for commercial use. He thinks that some day, it's going to be found out if they keep doing it like that. So he was probably preparing for contingencies that Adele and Rossum weren't planning for. For instance, I doubt that either Rossum or DeWitt wants to program the dolls to kill themselves rather than be captured, but I bet Dominic would think that's a good idea.

quote:
3) Was the re-programming that we have seen (Echo and November) actually the work of Dominic? Or is there still another player working here? Did someone else discover the chip and use it to their own ends? Are there other agents with alternate goals?
If the government already knows about the dollhouse, then a quiet investigation won't bring them down. It has to be done publically. But Dominic doesn't want that. I think there has to be someone else who wants to destroy the dollhouse, and it's Alpha, or Alpha is their tool.

quote:
The trouble is that they specifically mention that the chip is NSA tech and is used to change the Active's parameters... at least implying that Dominic was using that chip...

I think the best answer is that Dominic put the chip there, and the infiltrator found out, and started using it.
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
Is it just me, or does Dominic (here) bear somewhat of a resemblance to Alan Tudyk (here)? (What? So what if I'm obsessed with the latter?!) I confess myself strangely intrigued by this, even if I'm way off-target. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
They're both blond guys. Other than that, no.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
It's an easy mistake.

White guys do look kinda similar, but if you get to know them and learn what differences there are to look for, it becomes a lot easier to tell them apart.
 
Posted by Vadon (Member # 4561) on :
 
For those who want to know what Tudyk's involvement might* entail, there is some info on the upcoming episodes on this wiki page.

* It's on the internet, and I don't trust future episode summaries until I see them with my own eyes. [Smile]
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
I do find myself confusing reddish-tinged white guys. They all look the same, really. [Wink]
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
I understand. I keep confuse Viggo Mortensen with myself all the time.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
I always thought Dominic looked more like Kevin McKidd's brother in Journeyman.
 
Posted by Corwin (Member # 5705) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
It's an easy mistake.

White guys do look kinda similar, but if you get to know them and learn what differences there are to look for, it becomes a lot easier to tell them apart.

[ROFL]
 
Posted by Goody Scrivener (Member # 6742) on :
 
I think Dominic is being dragged out as a smoke-n-mirrors distraction. We were never intended to like him or grow attached to him in any way, so sending him to the attic becomes easy. I don't see how he could alter the Actives' programming. If we assume the programming was altered from within the Dollhouse, then I think it's either Topher or Ivy. But I still want to know who managed that remote wipe on Echo during the art heist assignment and how - and wonder if that was a hint to this.

I found it vaguely disturbing that the repeated lonely-hearts imprint that had Doc so spazzed out was for Boss Lady. And I wonder who the old lady is to Adele to be acting as a cover story and how Victor manages to elude his handler and the monitoring equipment for an entire weekend. Surely someone would have made a connection by now?

And I'm not sure how to feel about Mellie being the newest messenger and Paul's reaction. Paul's supposed to not let Mellie see or hear about his investigation so the Dollhouse doesn't get it. Which to me means he's going to break up with her now that he knows she's a doll. The alternative would be to drop the search entirely, but that would mean giving up on finding Caroline - and we still don't know why he's so obsessed with her, right? - as well as now giving up on Mellie. Now it's more personal, and I think his efforts are going to increase.
 
Posted by Glenn Arnold (Member # 3192) on :
 
So, according to imdb, A Spy in the House of Love will air on April 24, which is odd, considering it aired last week. Even odder, Haunted also airs April 24.

Now my real question is: was there a Dollhouse episode last Friday or what?
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
No, there wasn't. I don't remember why, but there was a valid reason.
 
Posted by Glenn Arnold (Member # 3192) on :
 
Ok. I was trying to find the episode online, because I thought I had missed it. But Hulu and the Fox website don't actually list the episode schedule, per se, so I couldn't tell if the episode hadn't aired or if it just wasn't available yet.
 
Posted by Vadon (Member # 4561) on :
 
Double Prison Break episodes were in its slot.

But the next episode should be playing next week.
 
Posted by swbarnes2 (Member # 10225) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Goody Scrivener:

And I'm not sure how to feel about Mellie being the newest messenger and Paul's reaction. Paul's supposed to not let Mellie see or hear about his investigation so the Dollhouse doesn't get it. Which to me means he's going to break up with her now that he knows she's a doll.

That would be a very bad idea, and Paul knows that. If the Dollhouse can't monitor Paul, they will kill him. With her body. He's going to stay with her, and give her false information about how his investigation is going.

I think the problem is going to be that it's very easy for Paul to say that the fake personalities that last a weekend aren't real people, and it's okay to wipe them away for the sake of the real Caroline. But Mellie is not only a creation of Topher, she's lived so long, she's probably a valid person in her own right. I think that both Mellie and Katie's mom have valid moral claims to existance, and it will be very hard to choose one over the other, but Paul will probably have to make that choice.
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
Hi, can it be next week yet?
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
This episode was sad. I liked it though, and I am very, very, very, very excited for next week.
 
Posted by Shanna (Member # 7900) on :
 
Eliza did a good job this week. However, who ever decided to give her that annoying piece of hair that was hanging on the side of her face...he or he is a bad person!

The main storyline was boring but I got seriously teary-eyed when they explained Topher's "diagnostic tests." Paul as a character continues to grow on me and I always love seeing Sierra and Victor.

Can't wait to see Alan T next week and I can't believe that Paul is going to be in the Dollhouse. If it comes back for another season, it'll be interesting to see what Joss does with the show.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Yeah, I find myself liking Sierra way more than Echo.

I didn't like this story as much as I thought I was going to, but I did appreciate seeing Eliza play someone other than Doll or Tough Girl.
 
Posted by Jon Boy (Member # 4284) on :
 
I thought last night's episode was the worst so far. I didn't care about the dead woman or anyone else involved in the murder mystery, and I thought it once again highlighted Dushku's limited range as an actress.

Next week's episode, however, looks very good.
 
Posted by Dogbreath (Member # 11879) on :
 
I thought Sierra did a brilliant job as Topher's buddy... we really need to see more of her.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
i didn't think Dushku did a great job, but I didn't think she did a bad one either, and it was nice to see at least trying to stretch.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
That was amazing. Though I thought Topher and his friend (they never gave the friend's name, did they?) were specifically talking about Star Trek TOS, and not classic SF in general.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
It wasn't the best episode I've seen, but I enjoyed it very much, and I realize now how upset I'll be if the show is canceled.

Oh noes! I've become emotionally invested in the characters! [Angst]
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
Gosh... Where can I find a friend like Sierra? She's so COOL!

Must... find... Dollhouse!
 
Posted by Sala (Member # 8980) on :
 
I wondered if Topher downloaded himself as his own companion . . . if no one could keep up with him unless they were him! I really liked Sierra's role as the buddy. It was great seeing him interact like a real person. So sad about the explanation, though.
 
Posted by Elmer's Glue (Member # 9313) on :
 
That's what I was guessing he did from the beginning. It seems like they would have told us though, so I guess not.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Did we already have a discussion of whether the Dollhouse could lead to a sort of Dollhouse-singularity? Engineer the perfect Dollhouse engineer, who can design better Dollhouse engineers who design better Dollhouses which can be used to design better Dollhouse engineers which eventually would probably lead to a super-Alpha (Omega, hee hee) that makes humanity obsolete.

I'm not quite sure what the significance of that is, but the possibility intrigues me.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
Sounds like a Von Neumann kind of thing.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
quote:
I wondered if Topher downloaded himself as his own companion . . .
Topher is genuinely afraid of sitting in the chair himself. I can't imagine him going through the procedure, especially since he knows he's pretty much the only person that can run the equipment reliably in the first place.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
quote:
Sounds like a Von Neumann kind of thing.
There was a variant idea I had that was more Von Neumann-sque, if a guy with Dollhouse technology decided to engineer one caste of people to build better and better dollhouses and another caste of people to go out and kidnap people and turn them into dolls, until eventually you'd dollhouse-ized the entire human race. Authorities would have a hard time catching you, because most of your targets would not appear to have disappeared - they'd spend most of their life acting normal, with their kidnapping-sleeper-personalities activated only when it was safe.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Actually, I think that idea might also have come from someone else. I vaguely remember talking about this before, but can't remember where and whose idea was which.
 
Posted by Magson (Member # 2300) on :
 
I'll admit -- I like Sierra and Victor a whole heckuva lot more than I like Echo. Loved Sierra as "the buddy." Victor wasn't given a lot to work with this episode, but I still just like it when he's on screen.

Echo.... I liked the storyline of her trying to solve her own murder. And sometimes I was even convinced that she was playing the older lady -- notably in the botched seduction of hew widowed husband, but for the most part, I felt like I was watching "the actress," not the character.

Can we fire her and make Sierra the lead instead? She's WAY more convincing in every imprint personality to me.
 
Posted by aeolusdallas (Member # 11455) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Raymond Arnold:
Actually, I think that idea might also have come from someone else. I vaguely remember talking about this before, but can't remember where and whose idea was which.

Vernor Vinge
 
Posted by Sterling (Member # 8096) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Nighthawk:
quote:
I wondered if Topher downloaded himself as his own companion . . .
Topher is genuinely afraid of sitting in the chair himself. I can't imagine him going through the procedure, especially since he knows he's pretty much the only person that can run the equipment reliably in the first place.
Aside from that, how weird would it be to have to wipe yourself? And wouldn't you have to construct a "you" who wasn't aware that that was what was going to happen?

Topher's talked up his ability to cobble together personalities and skills often enough for me to believe him capable of creating his own "best friend".

I will say that this is possibly the first episode I felt some sympathy for the guy, so that's deserves some kudos.

(who doesn't like chocolate-covered granola? [Wink] )
 
Posted by Goody Scrivener (Member # 6742) on :
 
Topher can't be the only one who can run the chair reliably. We know there are other Dollhouses. Especially now with the son admitting to being a client of the Manhattan house.

I didn't care for the Echo storyline. Too self-serving (for Adele and Margaret) in a way that her other assignments didn't touch. The Topher/Sierra imprint side story was nice. And I always love seeing Victor.

And can the Dollhouse really have that much influence that a fingerprint search can completely wipe ALL of the FBI records on that person? People? Sheesh, how many identities did Mellie/November/Annabelle have? Wow. I wonder what happens when the dolls finish out their contract and return to the real world... or do they ever get that far?
 
Posted by Corwin (Member # 5705) on :
 
Another question is, why were all those identities in the FBI database in the first place?!? I understand her real identity being there. But the others? It's like the dollhouse did sloppy work just so that it could delete the files afterwards. Woohoo, we can delete FBI files!

Or, maybe it was Dominic that put all the info there? But he said his goal was not to destroy the dollhouse. Why then put it at risk like that?
 
Posted by sylvrdragon (Member # 3332) on :
 
I'm fascinated by the concept of hearing what other people (Who really know you) think about you and what they suspect your motives to be etc. I know it isn't an original concept, but I haven't seen it in a while and I like how JW realized the potential for that story existed within his world. Kind of like a reverse Speaker for the Dead. Instead of telling the truth from their perspective, you tell THEM the truth from the from the view of everyone else.

At first, I suspected that Topher's friend was the mind of an actual person that maybe knew about the Dollhouse (much like Echo's Character), but the way it actually turned out was a better story.

I think Topher is actually my favorite character, and always has been. I can empathize with him best of any of the characters. Of course, I think he was characterized more than any of the others too. No other character has really related how they think of themselves- which I think is the most important piece of information that you NEED to empathize with someone. Getting to know someone by their actions is one thing, but knowing their motives and how they see themselves... it's exactly as OSC put it in Ender's Game "You can't truly know somebody... and not love them the way they love themselves."

More writers need to learn this.

I suppose it's only natural that I liked this episode. I saw in it some of the styles of a Writer that I already know I like.
 
Posted by Amilia (Member # 8912) on :
 
Corwin: Maybe she was a career conartist with multiple identities that had gotten into trouble before she went into the dollhouse, and part of the deal with becoming a doll was that her record would be wiped clean?
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
It looked to me like those were identities she'd had as a Doll where she'd gotten picked up by the police. Given what some of the fantasies might have been among their clients, that wouldn't surprise me all that much. What I don't get is why they'd let it get into the system, and only delete it when someone was looking.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Not only that, remove it from the screen while someone is looking at it.

The ability to delete a thread on Hatrack is fairly trivial given the right permissions. The ability to delete a thread on Hatrack and simultaneously force all computers currently viewing that thread to close and retain no records of that thread is a slightly more impressive ability.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lisa:
It looked to me like those were identities she'd had as a Doll where she'd gotten picked up by the police. Given what some of the fantasies might have been among their clients, that wouldn't surprise me all that much. What I don't get is why they'd let it get into the system, and only delete it when someone was looking.

You'd think that they would have found the fingerprint matches way before that. I mean, the 2nd time they put the fingerprints in it would have been enough.

And, yes, some of those pictures were clearly mug shots.

What I think is that those shots were from before she was an active, and she elected to become an active to leave that past behind.
 
Posted by swbarnes2 (Member # 10225) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Goody Scrivener:
And I always love seeing Victor.

Did anyone else notice how Victor sounded just like Mal?

And during an outdoors scene with him and the horses, a guy dressed just like Mal, in tan pants and a burgundy shirt, walked in front of the camera leading a horse twice?
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
Can I just be the first to say, Holy sh*t. I really do not know what is going to happen next week.

I have ten bazillion questions, chief amongst them (I think!) being, Why is Alpha Topher? It is very, very baffling. Also, who was Topher first? Was the original architect, Stephen Whatshisface, the original Topher? Are Nice Alpha and Topher both copies of Stephen Whatsit, or is Nice Alpha a composite of Stephen Whatsit and Topher (among other things)?

In other news, Mean Alpha is really frightening.

Edit to add: Victor-as-Lawrence said "Whiskey" when Dr. Saunders gave him the shot. Dr. Saunders quickly said, "He wants a drink." We've never met a Doll called Whiskey but it would be a Doll's name. Is he referencing a Doll that we've never met before? Addressing somebody in the room with him at the time?

[ May 01, 2009, 10:22 PM: Message edited by: Fyfe ]
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I'm not sure what I thought of this episode. I really liked everything up to and including the Alpha reveal, but after that I thought Alpha and Echo both acted too... cartoony? Their make out scene looked fake to me and the Alpha toying with the doctor scene felt... off somehow. Maybe I was comparing it too much to Sylar.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Fyfe:
Edit to add: Victor-as-Lawrence said "Whiskey" when Dr. Saunders gave him the shot. Dr. Saunders quickly said, "He wants a drink." We've never met a Doll called Whiskey but it would be a Doll's name. Is he referencing a Doll that we've never met before? Addressing somebody in the room with him at the time?

I had my doubts, but now I'm convinced that the doctor's a doll. After the whole discussion with Alpha about whether she wanted to be a doctor all along I thought back... In the wacky episode where all the non-dolls went loopy, do we ever get to see the doctor suffer ill effects?
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
Reading this thread has me remarking that it is patently obvious at this point that Dollhouse's extremely crappy opening, both in terms of quality and ratings, are patently the fault of interference from Fox, and when that interference was removed, there existed in its wake a quality show with ample potential.

If Fox cans it (which seems very likely!) then it will be the final cap on a comedy of errors. They pay into something just to destroy it. "You're doing it wrong" doesn't even begin to cover it.
 
Posted by Elmer's Glue (Member # 9313) on :
 
Whatever helps you sleep at night.
 
Posted by Sala (Member # 8980) on :
 
quote:
I have ten bazillion questions, chief amongst them (I think!) being, Why is Alpha Topher? It is very, very baffling. Also, who was Topher first? Was the original architect, Stephen Whatshisface, the original Topher? Are Nice Alpha and Topher both copies of Stephen Whatsit, or is Nice Alpha a composite of Stephen Whatsit and Topher (among other things)?
Okay, I seem to have missed something here. Topher is Alpha? Good Alpha? When and how was this revealed? I really missed it.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
Nowhere in the episode was it indicated that Alpha was Topher. I don't know Fyfe is talking about. Unless I missed a lot.

I wish they would do more with Amy Acker.
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
It doesn't get revealed, I just noticed. Watch Alpha when Ballard goes to visit him - his mannerisms and ways of speaking are exactly like Topher's. It makes me slightly wonder whether Topher may be a Doll. (Whiskey?)
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
I still don't see it.
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
Seriously, once you notice, it's unmistakable. Topher's always gesturing with one hand with the thumb and forefinger touching, and Alpha does that; Topher does that thing where he pauses, draws out a few words, and then rushes through the next bunch, and Alpha does that. I feel very impressed with Alan Tudyk's leet acting skillz.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
Alright, I've watched it again and I think you're right. Does Alpha then have a bunch of imprints that he can utilize? If he does, and he has Topher's imprint (that means that Topher is an active)...wow. Who's not an active?

Fyfe, you're right. Once you notice, it is unmistakable.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I've already mentally prepared myself for everyone and her sister turning out to be a doll. The Alpha/Topher thing is interesting, although there's so many different ways it could play out that I can't begin to speculate.
 
Posted by Jeorge (Member # 11524) on :
 
I've found the series moderately interesting all season, but this week's episode was the first time I thought, "I hope they don't cancel this..."
 
Posted by Corwin (Member # 5705) on :
 
The White Whale and Raymond Arnold: only a few episodes ago we saw who was and who wasn't an active by how they reacted to a chemical. If Topher turns out to be an active they're doing it wrong. [Razz]

So no, Topher may not be an active, but that doesn't mean that his brain couldn't have been scanned. Scanning doesn't kill you or instantly erase your memory, as can be seen from the old lady that got killed in the previous episode.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
quote:
The White Whale and Raymond Arnold: only a few episodes ago we saw who was and who wasn't an active by how they reacted to a chemical. If Topher turns out to be an active they're doing it wrong.
Now I'm really going to have to re-watch that to see if the doctor has any reaction.
 
Posted by The Pixiest (Member # 1863) on :
 
Amy Acker is Whiskey, not Topher.
 
Posted by Kwea (Member # 2199) on :
 
Yeah, and it would explain Alpha's talent with the Dollhouse's computers far better than "I made this place, even if I didn't know where it was" , which was the line they tried to use.

And since Topher could have made NEW passwords since the scan, it would cover why Alpha couldn't use Topher's computer to do it. Although why in the world they won't change all of it anyway I'll never know. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by The Pixiest (Member # 1863) on :
 
It's possible that every Dollhouse has it's own Topher. A full time active that never gets imprinted with anything else. All with the exact same imprint.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
It's also possible that Topher merely imprinted his own personality into Alpha during one of the testing stages. Topher obviously DOES think so highly of himself that I wouldn't put it past him to assume his level of brilliance was clearly something worth experimenting with.
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
I officially agree that Amy Acker is a Doll. I thought about it some more - the Alpha argument is compelling, and now that I'm thinking about it, Victor is looking straight at her when he says "Whiskey". First he says "Topher!" and then "Adelle, don't do this," and then, as Amy Acker is giving him a shot, "Whiskey!"
 
Posted by Glenn Arnold (Member # 3192) on :
 
Also, Alpha slashes the faces of dolls, for whatever reason, and he slashed Amy Acker's face as well. It may be that he's marking dolls so they can be identified.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
That is interesting and logical (in a serial killer kinda way).
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Also, what exactly has Amy Acker DONE that's got everyone so ga-ga over her? I haven't seen her earlier work, so all I have to go off is a pretty, sad looking face.
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
She was Fred in Angel - she was a total dear. I've seen her briefly in a few other things, but mainly I love her because she was such a dear as Fred.
 
Posted by Amilia (Member # 8912) on :
 
Theory: Echo tells the little girl to think of herself as the prince. She will swoop in and rescue herself. What if part of Alpha's imprint is Caroline? Which is why Echo is the only doll who was left alive after Alpha's original killing spree. She didn't even get her face slashed.

Course, I'm not as familiar with Caroline's mannerisms as I am with Topher's. So I don't actually have anything else going for this theory other than it is interesting and it fits with the prince coming to rescue her thing they had going.

Or maybe she somehow programmed Alpha.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Raymond Arnold:
Also, what exactly has Amy Acker DONE that's got everyone so ga-ga over her? I haven't seen her earlier work, so all I have to go off is a pretty, sad looking face.

She charmed the pants off of everyone in Angel. Whedon, at one point, said that he realized that "Fred" (her character) was the only thing that every other character in (and viewer of) the show loved (... [Big Grin] ).
 
Posted by Eaquae Legit (Member # 3063) on :
 
I'm just happy to be vindicated in my belief that Alan Tudyk is Alpha. I must have read it somewhere early on (within two episodes), but the spoiler got erased. It's been a confusing couple of months with the attempted misdirection about his character.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
It was up on IMDB for awhile, then removed. And now he's back.
 
Posted by adfectio (Member # 11070) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Glenn Arnold:
Also, Alpha slashes the faces of dolls, for whatever reason, and he slashed Amy Acker's face as well. It may be that he's marking dolls so they can be identified.

That's not actually true. He may slash mostly dolls, but then there's the problem of the older man who actually did design the system. His face was slashed as well, and I don't see any evidence that he's a doll.

I never would have caught Alpha acting like Topher if it hadn't been mentioned here, though.
 
Posted by Dogbreath (Member # 11879) on :
 
First impression: wow, Alan Tudyk has really put on some muscle since Firefly! They certainly got him into doll shape...

Second, shouldn't Ballard be noticing these things? Despite his knowledge of dollhouse he doesn't even question the beautiful neighbor who's always making him food and can break necks at the drop of a hat until it's blatantly shoved in his face. Now, he meets up with a pothead who never goes out and drinks his own urine, but is somehow built like an athlete, and doesn't even question it, he's so focused on "save Caroline!" Anyone else think he's not the smartest cookie in the jar? (especially since his entire job is supposedly putting together small clues)

I enjoyed some of the quick references to other sci-fi shows of similar nature in this episode. At one point, Topher says "frak!" (a reference to BSG), and at another, Adelle briefly mentions visiting "the Centre". (a pretty blatant reference to The Pretender)

Show's getting better, really liked some of the personal touches in the last few episodes, made the characters a bit more human.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
Well, the way the "Russian" assassin was killed in Ballard's apartment -- neck snapped after head rammed into coffee table during struggle -- could have been an accident, and he had no reason to think it wasn't until later. And Tudyk did not look muscular until a) he put on the skin tight clothing and b) started carrying himself like Alpha. Initially he looked like a stoner. Then he put the clothes on and you could tell he was in decent shape, but didn't look especially ripped.
Then he appeared in front of Dr. Saunders, and he was both powerful and menacing.

Tudyk himself said he has a Ned Flanders sort of body, you don't notice the muscle right away.

Also, the BSG reference? Possibly because the episode was written by Jane Espenson, one of the BSG writers [Smile]
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I like that the Frak actually made sense in context, since it's perfectly reasonable to assume Topher HAS seen BSG and has simply adopted the use of the word for himself (I've done that with some shows I like)
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Raymond Arnold:
It's also possible that Topher merely imprinted his own personality into Alpha during one of the testing stages. Topher obviously DOES think so highly of himself that I wouldn't put it past him to assume his level of brilliance was clearly something worth experimenting with.

I think that's obviously the case. Topher was affected by the drug, so he can't be an active. But Alpha seems to be the sum of all his imprints. For some reason, despite the wiping, he has access to every imprint that was applied to him, including Topher's. Either that drove him maniac-crazy, or one of the imprints was a wacko, but either way, it makes him extremely dangerous. Imagine Echo with the combined skills and instabilities of just all the imprints we've seen her get this season.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
General consensus on Whedonesque is that Alpha was, at some point, one of Topher's birthday buddies, imprinted by Topher with Topher.
 
Posted by Dogbreath (Member # 11879) on :
 
Chris: I guess so, but still... he's put on at least 20 pounds since Firefly. As soon as he put on the doll outfit I was thinking "no way this guy is who he claims to be."
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
Chris - That's what I was thinking! I only wondered because Sierra as birthday buddy didn't have all the same mannerisms, just all the same interests.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
From the interview I saw:

Speaking of which, you look like you put on some muscle for the part.
TUDYK: Yes, because they cast a damn body double that looks like the Hulk! Joss showed me the first episode where you see Alpha from behind and I was like, "Oh my God. I've got a lot of work to do." But I have a Ned Flanders kind of body. When I'm wearing baggy clothes you wouldn't expect that I have any muscle. Just like in tonight's episode. I don't look too wildly in shape at first. It's when I put on the tight shirt that you see it.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Chris Bridges:
General consensus on Whedonesque is that Alpha was, at some point, one of Topher's birthday buddies, imprinted by Topher with Topher.

Chekov's gun? Hmm... I guess that makes sense.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Sierra didn't quite seem like a Topher clone, but I could definitely see him trying out a direct clone of himself as one of his earlier birthday buddies.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
quote:
Chekov's gun?
I had to look that term up. Interesting.

quote:
Sierra didn't quite seem like a Topher clone...
I wouldn't want a direct clone of myself, either - I'd drive myself mad.

Topher has already shown that he can combine personalities; perhaps in Alpha's case he simply combined the wrong ones.
 
Posted by Goody Scrivener (Member # 6742) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The White Whale:
Alright, I've watched it again and I think you're right. Does Alpha then have a bunch of imprints that he can utilize? If he does, and he has Topher's imprint (that means that Topher is an active)...wow. Who's not an active?

Fyfe, you're right. Once you notice, it is unmistakable.

It could explain Topher's fear of the chair. Someone (maybe Alpha, maybe not) builds a tech master imprint that includes a fear of his own tech just to make sure he's never in a position to get wiped or reprinted.

With regard to that psych drug from the college campus... I seem to recall Echo, Victor and Sierra all reacted, although later than "normal" people.

Edit because I just had a wild idea...

Topher is a doll. A sleeper like Mellie, perhaps, but still a doll. The annual "diagnostic" testing that he did with Sierra is actually a diagnostic for Adelle, etc. to see how well Topher is holding up as compared to the original personality. We've already gotten indications that Adelle, while apparently in control of the LA House, reports to a higher power somewhere. I don't think that was just a cover story to have a weekend tryst with the Roger personality in the beachhouse. Therefore, a diagnostic like this would allow those overseers to monitor Topher's adjustment as well.

Which makes me wonder... Topher said that the dolls didn't react because of the mindscrub process. I don't remember the exact details, but he credited the wipe and imprint sequence as their protection. If Topher is a sleeper, he's had the same personality imprint for a while. Maybe that duration caused him to lose some of his "immunity". I wonder how Mellie would have reacted if she'd been on campus.

[ May 04, 2009, 02:18 AM: Message edited by: Goody Scrivener ]
 
Posted by swbarnes2 (Member # 10225) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Goody Scrivener:
With regard to that psych drug from the college campus... I seem to recall Echo, Victor and Sierra all reacted, although later than "normal" people.

But not like normal people. Normal people went loopy. Echo, Victor and Sierra all started flashing back to old imprints.

Topher and DeWitt reacted like everyone else.
 
Posted by Puppy (Member # 6721) on :
 
I think they really have exhausted the pool of potential surprise dolls at this point. It's not an interesting reveal anymore, anyway [Smile]
 
Posted by Brinestone (Member # 5755) on :
 
Yeah, I'm kind of with you, Puppy.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Puppy:
I think they really have exhausted the pool of potential surprise dolls at this point. It's not an interesting reveal anymore, anyway [Smile]

Now they need to do the opposite. Someone who we think is a doll, but really isn't.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Puppy:
I think they really have exhausted the pool of potential surprise dolls at this point. It's not an interesting reveal anymore, anyway [Smile]

Except for the Doctor, who I'm 99.9% sure is a doll, but that hasn't been revealed yet. I went back and watched 'Echos' where the drug showed who was and wasn't an active, and Amy Acker did not make an appearance.
 
Posted by Vadon (Member # 4561) on :
 
I also remember there being a scene a couple episodes back where someone asked Acker whether or not she even leaves the Dollhouse. There wasn't a conclusive answer, if I recall correctly.
 
Posted by sylvrdragon (Member # 3332) on :
 
Actually, between Fyfe's observation and a few key lines in past episodes, it's obvious now that Alpha has some connection with Topher. Most likely Alpha was imprinted with Topher at some point.

The reason I say that is, remember the episode where Echo was remote wiped. When they were discussing who was capable of doing it, I think it may have been Topher who said that only he or Alpha would have been able to figure it out. Now why would Topher think that Alpha could match him? We've all seen how prideful Topher is (and rightly so), so naturally, the only person aside from himself that he could believe capable... is a copy of himself. Though maybe it was Dewitt that suggested Alpha, but still.

That might also help to explain why Topher also remained untouched when Alpha went on his initial rampage.

I really like the idea about Alpha being the subject of an earlier calibration. I think that these last 2 episodes coming back to back tells us that Whedon wants us to see this connection (Though I think real credit goes to Fyfe on this one, cause I never would have put this together if it hadn't already been pointed out) or at the very least, wants to look back and realize that it was always there (more likely I think).

In any case, I think we can make a good case that Alpha was the "Inside man" that imprinted the secret message in Echo and November in order to get Ballard to take him into the Dollhouse and divert Boyd. If he has Topher's skills, then I don't think it would be beyond him, even if he had to do it remotely.

I don't think it would be a good idea for Topher to end up being an Active. It's bad form to straight out lie to the audience by making exceptions to your own rules. If they say the drug only affected non-Actives, then that should (ideally) be taken at face value.
 
Posted by TheGrimace (Member # 9178) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by sylvrdragon:
In any case, I think we can make a good case that Alpha was the "Inside man" that imprinted the secret message in Echo and November in order to get Ballard to take him into the Dollhouse and divert Boyd. If he has Topher's skills, then I don't think it would be beyond him, even if he had to do it remotely.

The trouble with this is that we saw a scene with Alpha mailing the picture/video of alpha to Ballard, yet when Millie/November is talking with Ballard she states that the inside man did not send the envelopes. So unless he imprinted her to lie about that (and it doesn't seem like there is any reason for that) it's a no-go.

Also, my guess (though admittedly it's just a guess) is that Alpha needed Ballard to lead him back to the Dollhouse because he had forgotten where it was. Or perhaps he was just bringing Ballard there to distract security while he went for Echo.

Additionally, when re-watching the episode where they catch Dominic, and there's still points of confusion/error that are bugging me..

1) Dominic claims that the chip is NSA tech, but makes no claims that he has been using it. He claims that he's been honest about his methods, and that he's only worked to protect the Dollhouse. The usages of the chip that we've seen haven't seemed to be in-line with Dominic's stated goals or claims to have been honest about his methods. but then why would he claim the chip was NSA?

2) It's questionable whether Millie's corrupted imprint was performed after the chip was removed. Though I guess I could chalk this up to time compression or something and say that Topher discovered it immediately after imprinting her (but then wouldn't he have tried holding off on letting her go?).

The basic conundrum here is whether or not Dominic was actually using the chip or if he's covering for someone else for some reason.

We have plenty of candidates who could have implanted/used it for various reasons, but Dominic just doesn't seem right.
 
Posted by FlyingCow (Member # 2150) on :
 
It's possible that after the Alpha attack, they moved the Dollhouse to a different location so that he wouldn't be able to find his way back. As a safety precaution. And he dangled Ballard in front of the Dollhouse to get them to slip up enough so that he could get their location.
 
Posted by dabbler (Member # 6443) on :
 
I thought the NSA chip was planted by Dominic and had nothing to do with Millie's secret reveal.

Doesn't sound likely they moved the location. It does sound odd that Alpha didn't know where it was. At the least Ballard was a useful sidekick for him to get in and out with little detection. Seems like a lot of effort to slowly entice Ballard with enough information to finally find it.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
Yay for Whedon et al. I think they did a great job with this first season, especially once Fox let them off their leash. It looks to be exiting, unique, quirky, and entertaining (provided it's not canceled).

I'm liking the idea of Alpha viewing himself as a ubermensch, with a hard core schizophrenia of his several dozen personalities. I like the idea of Ballard 'working' for the Dollhouse. I'm sure he's still going to try and take it down, but it'll be interesting to see how he handles it, and how Adelle handles him. I'm liking Dr. Saunders' / Whiskey's self-awareness as a doll, and look forward to see how that develops, along with her and Topher's relationship.

I think the show has proven it's potential, and just hope that Fox sees that.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I loved Alpha's acting, and actually was kinda impressed with Echo's acting as well. There were a few moments where you saw her shift personalities and I was surprised that I could recognized.
 
Posted by Brinestone (Member # 5755) on :
 
I'm not sure how I felt about this episode. Somehow it made Alpha less scary to me. I did like Whiskey's self-awareness.
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
I definitely agree - love it that Whiskey now knows she's a doll.
 
Posted by twinky (Member # 693) on :
 
I found it a little jarring that Alpha suddenly had trouble keeping his personalities in check when in the very last episode he spent quite a good chunk of time pretending to be the building designer guy, and pulling it off perfectly.

Other than that, I really enjoyed it. I've always liked Whiskey and I'm really glad to see her character developing.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
If there is a second season, I'm wondering how/if we'll see November anymore. I hope it's something more than Ballard stalking her and hitting on her every chance he gets.

And the first scene where Whiskey is giving the captive a lap dance... that was way more hot than anything Echo could have done. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by scholarette (Member # 11540) on :
 
I think that Alpha had trouble in last night's episode keeping the personalities straight because he was not really trying with Echo. Echo was his soulmate, he figured he did not need to keep up appearances with her, he could just relax and be himself.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
It's not looking good...
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by twinky:
I found it a little jarring that Alpha suddenly had trouble keeping his personalities in check when in the very last episode he spent quite a good chunk of time pretending to be the building designer guy, and pulling it off perfectly.

I kind of assumed that he wasn't really going out in public and interacting with people, so that there wasn't much stress put on his keeping the personalities straight.

See also: certain copious amounts of medicinal plants. [Wink]
 
Posted by sarahdipity (Member # 3254) on :
 
Do they count online ratings when counting viewership?
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
They do (sometimes) but it doesn't count for as much.
 
Posted by plaid (Member # 2393) on :
 
Hope the Fox folks looking at the ratings will take into account the new Star Trek movie just opening...
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
I'm guessing that Topher and Whiskey's original personality knew each other. Or why would he have answered her that way when she asked why he programmed her to hate him?
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Nighthawk:
It's not looking good...

Well, what did the imbeciles at Fox think would happen with a Friday night time slot?
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
I thought it was a self-loathing thing, with Topher and Whiskey...
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
A glimmer of hope?
 
Posted by The Pixiest (Member # 1863) on :
 
ya baby

http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/05/dollhouse-second-season.html

Hope this isn't a lie.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
Um, got that covered, The Pixiest.
 
Posted by The Pixiest (Member # 1863) on :
 
sorry whale, thought yours was the "leaning toward" story that was out earlier...
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
And still no word on Terminator....

If they're renewing dollhouse it feels hypocritical to not renew Terminator - it ended with *slightly* better ratings and has a motion picture to help bring in more. Unless they seriously are just trying to make amends with the Whedonite community.
 
Posted by The Pixiest (Member # 1863) on :
 
Dollhouse is much less expensive. That was the selling point. cheap.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Ah. I guess I can see that. That definitely was one of Terminator's major issues (especially given the finale's set up for season 3).
 
Posted by El JT de Spang (Member # 7742) on :
 
Dollhouse is also expected to perform much stronger in DVD sales and tie-in stuff, though how on Earth they calculate that with any degree of certainty I'll never know.
 
Posted by Marek (Member # 5404) on :
 
I'm thinking they are basing on the DVD sales v. ratings of Firefly, Angel and Buffy. Though that would be a pretty stupid basis, because the shows are way too different, still that is my guess for why they expect such high DVD sales.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
Terminator already got a second season and ratings still went down, and FOX knows how sales on the 1st season DVD did. It's not the same thing at all.

Presales on the Dollhouse DVD were strong, streaming and DVR numbers were excellent, and when he filmed a 13th episode in a couple of days with half the budget (which will be on the DVD) Joss demonstrated he could make good shows more cheaply. The demo for FOX execs was the 13th ep and Joss' pitch for the different direction of the 2nd season.

Also, while ratings weren't great, they weren't any worse than other FOX shows they've run on Friday nights and since the set's already been built, new shows of Dollhouse would be cheaper than starting a new one fresh (a reduced budget was apparently part of the deal). Positive buzz from the renewal and Joss' fan base may help pump up numbers next year.

Probably didn't hurt that Dollhouse fans helped break the FOX customer service phone bank Friday [Smile]
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
The Pixiest, you were right. My first link had the story that Fox was leaning towards giving a second season. Now both links (yours and mine) are the same, saying that it had granted a second season.

Sorry for being snippy. Strange shifting URLs.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
quote:
Terminator already got a second season and ratings still went down, and FOX knows how sales on the 1st season DVD did. It's not the same thing at all.
Terminator ratings have remained pretty constant the whole time. When it was moved to a Friday slot, the ratings went down exactly the same amount you'd expect any show to go down when moved to Friday, and the DVRs were similar to Dollhouse. I have no idea what the Season 2 preorder numbers look like though. (It doesn't surprise me that Season 1 didn't sell that well because Season 2 was there the show really picked up, IMO).
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
Oh hooray! I am so pleased - I was completely expecting Dollhouse to be canceled, and my other show too, Better Off Ted, and instead they have BOTH been renewed!
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I'm glad for Better off Ted. Something about that show makes it feel like the new Scrubs to me. (Of course then they went and gave Scrubs another season, which I'm still not sure how I think about)
 
Posted by Goody Scrivener (Member # 6742) on :
 
It's official!!
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
Joss talks about the Dollhouse renewal
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
Summer Glau coming to Dollhouse?

Link contains spoilers to this and several other shows, so for the cheap seats:

quote:
Question: With Sarah Connor Chronicles canceled, please tell me there is a possibility of Summer Glau making an appearance on Dollhouse! --Jenn

Ausiello: The noise you're about to hear is the sound of the Whedonverse exploding. Joss confirms to me exclusively that, well, he's one step head of you. "If anybody thinks [bringing Summer onto Dollhouse] hasn't occurred to me already then they have not met me," he says. "I mentioned it to her before [SCC] was canceled. I was like, 'You know, we should get you in the 'house.' But first we have to come up with something that works." And casting her as a doll would not work, insists Whedon. "Summer would be perfect to play an active, but she's done that [type of role] a lot," he says. "I'd rather see her play someone who talks too much. The most fun I have is when I get somebody who's good and comfortable at doing something, and then I make them do something else. Summer said to me, 'I would like to play a normal girl before I die of extreme old age.'"


 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Hell. Yeah.
 
Posted by Dogbreath (Member # 11879) on :
 
Good for them.

I wasn't actively rooting for this show to get renewed, but I won't mind watching another season, either.
 
Posted by plaid (Member # 2393) on :
 
OK, so now that it's been renewed and I'm willing to invest in the series...

I've seen episode 1; I know 6 is where it starts getting better; are any of the episodes from 2-5 worth seeing?
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I'd skip to episode 6 if you really weren't impressed by episode 1. I thought 2-5 were decent but I also thought episode 1 was decent.
 
Posted by Elmer's Glue (Member # 9313) on :
 
Yes, all of them. The main plots may stink for a few but there are a lot of important smaller stuff in them.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
I think the character development in the first episodes is worth sitting through. And there are many good moments, interspersed amongst the bad ones.
 
Posted by pooka (Member # 5003) on :
 
Well, crap. There go my friday nights for next year. Maybe I can somehow keep this news from my husband.
 
Posted by Damien.m (Member # 8462) on :
 
Epitaph One is on the internets. And it is amazing. Dollhouse has never had more potential. Fraktacular.
 
Posted by Shanna (Member # 7900) on :
 
I just watched "Epitaph One" and my brain is suffering from so much massive awesome overload that the only thing I keep thinking is how much I love Amy Acker.

But that might be because I just got done marathon watching all of "Angel" a few weeks ago.

I feel like I'm going to have to watch it a few more times to really catch even half of the little details being throw out.
 
Posted by TheGrimace (Member # 9178) on :
 
I have to agree on Epitaph One, I loved the episode, and in particular loved the delightfully creepy job done by Amy Acker.

The original pilot I think was fascinating as well. I'm torn, because as someone who has seen the rest of the season, I prefer some aspects of the original pilot (i.e. I think it did a better job of clearly and concisely laying out what kind of stuff the Dollhouse does, and what some of the thoughts behind it are) but probably would have made for a bad pilot. In general too much was crammed into one episode, so instead of getting neat reveals like Vicktor turning out to be a doll, you just would have had a bunch of interesting things crammed in, but wouldn't have any connection with the characters involved.
 
Posted by Geraine (Member # 9913) on :
 
I am thankful Dollhouse is coming back. The first few episodes dragged, but there are a lot of series that start out slow. Fringe is another good example of a series that started out slow then slapped me in the face with pure awesomeness

I just wish Joss would make a sequel for Dr. Horrible's Sing Along Blog, or even a full blown series... It was brilliant, plus it had Felicia Day. MMMmmmmm Felicia Day
 
Posted by Dogbreath (Member # 11879) on :
 
Where are you guys watching Epitaph One? I can't find it on Fox or Hulu.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
It's only on the DVD. (And... on slightly less than legal places in the dark corners of the interwebz).
 
Posted by The Pixiest (Member # 1863) on :
 
'k... Watched Epitaph One last night.

It was an amazing episode but I'm kinda sad I watched it. How are they going to have any suspense for the second and later seasons? Romances are resolved. Any time certain people are in danger we'll know they'll be ok because they were alive for events in or referenced in this episode...

So what could possibly happen next season to keep us glued to our seat? What could happen in season three if we get that far?
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Have you seen Lost? Season 4 was some of the most amazing storytelling I've seen, because they start by telling you who gets off the island and then periodically have flash forwards showing what happened once they got there... yet it still keeps everything mysterious.

This is "Epitaph One." I assume that each season will have its own plot arc, and end with an "Epitaph X" that skips ahead to continue the story of the ending. The last season things will finally sync up and the last Epitaph will presumably resolve everything.
 
Posted by neo-dragon (Member # 7168) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Raymond Arnold:

This is "Epitaph One." I assume that each season will have its own plot arc, and end with an "Epitaph X" that skips ahead to continue the story of the ending. The last season things will finally sync up and the last Epitaph will presumably resolve everything.

That's actually a really incredible idea. It'll almost be like a spin-off show within the show. As it is now, does anyone else find it a real downer that we now know that the Dollhouse will inevitably lead to the end of the world?
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Well, it's not like we didn't already know it was a terrible idea.
 
Posted by Miro (Member # 1178) on :
 
I fear for Joss Whedon's sanity. And after watching Epitaph One, I fear for my own. Bizarre.
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
Sheesh, if you hadn't been watching all along, last night's episode was extremely confusing. I watched with my sister, who's never seen it, and I spent every commercial break trying to explain why things were happening. (She liked it though!)

However, as someone who has been watching all along, all that business with Whiskey was very very good. I was pleased they gave Topher layers, finally, and that scene between him and Whiskey was amazing.

Also, it really screwed with my head to see Lee doing a British accent and Wesley doing an American one. I was all, snap out of it, guys! Let's be real here. It is very strange to me that those are their actual accents...
 
Posted by Amanecer (Member # 4068) on :
 
Fyfe,

I'm in total agreement with everything you said. As somebody who watched the first season, I thought it was probably the best episode yet. They've realized that a main character who changes every week isn't that captivating and they need to make the people who DO have stable personalities more important and more interesting. I cared about Whiskey- something I didn't feel towards any of the characters last season. I hope this is a sign of the tone of the season.

That said, I watched it with somebody who'd never seen any episodes before. They were completely lost and didn't overly enjoy it. So :-/
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
I was just really happy to have Helo and Apollo on my television together again (...without having to put in a DVD). [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Dogbreath (Member # 11879) on :
 
This episode made Topher a real person for me, and not just some despicable cutout from the Xander mold as I'd always dismissed him before. It also showed me that Fran Kranz has real acting talent... it had just been hidden underneath the dorky goofball he's been playing. (or maybe his ability to play the dorky goofball effectively *is* an indication of his talent)

I absolutely loved Amy Acker in this episode as well. She has all the subtlety and grace that Eliza Dushku lacks... I personally think she would've made a much better Echo. As is, she makes a perfect Whiskey, and I'm glad they're giving her more screen time... she deserves it.

Great show overall, I'm starting to really enjoy Dollhouse, instead of feeling somewhat put off by each episode.

(as a BTW, is there only a tiny pool of actors who play sci-fi shows? I'm starting to get de ja vu from all the familiar faces...)
 
Posted by pooka (Member # 5003) on :
 
quote:
They've realized that a main character who changes every week isn't that captivating and they need to make the people who DO have stable personalities more important and more interesting.
I thought the whole point was the Echo has some quality, whether you want to call it character or soul, that persists despite the layers of personality and experience.
 
Posted by daventor (Member # 11981) on :
 
I just watched it on Hulu. WOW. The end of the last season set up so much potential and this episode took it and ran with it.

The Whiskey/Topher scenes were the highlight for me too, but I actually thought Eliza Dushku was really good in her scenes, especially the confrontation between her and the arms dealer where she starts to crack(I do usually find her to be the weakest link; when I saw the opening credit sequence that is only shots of her all I could think was, "Put up the other actors/characters; they're the ones I watch the show for, not Eliza/Echo.") and liked the Ballard-as-client subplot. Actually, I think I am starting to get more interested in Echo as she really is starting to break out of the passive active role.

I'm really pumped that Whedon's has gone all-out on exploring all the moral and ethical contradictions in all the characters and their relationships and the Dollhouse itself. It's so nice to see actually genuinely SMART scifi on television.

Anyways, my favorite characters are probably Topher and Whiskey/Saunders (Topher is very a creep, but now the facade is falling apart and we can see he actually DOES feel guilt over what he does; Whiskey/Saudners just makes for a wonderful character and while I feel bad for her, I like that she really has a dark side too and Amy Acker plays it so well), but I also like Ballard a lot. Yes, his obsession with Echo's not really healthy but I feel like he is the only one not-Doll character in the series that really wants to do the right thing (bring the Dollhouse down), though he's struggling to figure out just how to do that and stick to his own moral code. Boyd just frustrates me; how can you have so much seeming moral clarity but still be doing what you're doing? I'm glad Ballard vocally questioned Boyd's motives when Adelle suspects Ballard of tipping off the Senator on Rossum; I hope this season we get to figure out what Boyd's deal (or "excuse," as Whiskey put it) really is.

As for Adelle, Olivia does a great job acting as her (loved the moment where she lingers too much on Victor's face), and the character is very well-written, but I seriously want her, before the series is over, to either (a) die (b) failing that, at least eventually break down like Topher, with all the smugness gone and the realization that the strange moral universe she's devised for herself where she's some noble benefactor to humanity is pure BS.

Long post. Point is, great premiere.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Yeah, I saw this episode and was like "holy crap wow." All the reasons have been pretty well stated.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Carrie:
I was just really happy to have Helo and Apollo on my television together again (...without having to put in a DVD). [Big Grin]

And they got to deck each other quite a few times, something I'm betting they wanted to do a whole helluva lot of times in BSG.
 
Posted by Brinestone (Member # 5755) on :
 
I can't remember . . . Jamie Bamber just gets arrested at the end of the episode, right? How on earth would the Dollhouse allow him to walk away knowing what he knows? Do they just assume no one will believe his story?
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
I came away with the impression that he doesn't know: he never used the term "doll" or "dollhouse" himself, neither did Ballard in the hangar. The exchange was a private exchange of sorts between Ballard and Echo, and Barber simply stood around wondering "OK, what the hell is going on?"
 
Posted by Amanecer (Member # 4068) on :
 
quote:
I thought the whole point was the Echo has some quality, whether you want to call it character or soul, that persists despite the layers of personality and experience.
For me at least, this effect is either far too subtle or far too obvious (memory flashbacks) to be an interesting plot line at the moment.
 
Posted by Dogbreath (Member # 11879) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brinestone:
I can't remember . . . Jamie Bamber just gets arrested at the end of the episode, right? How on earth would the Dollhouse allow him to walk away knowing what he knows? Do they just assume no one will believe his story?

He just assumed she was a crazy person, or had gone crazy under the pressure.
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
I thought the dialogue with Amy Acker and Topher sounded sappy and melodramatic. It could be bad directing. But a girl as pretty as Acker, prancing around half-dressed and flirty, covers all manners of flat writing.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Eh, I didn't think it was that bad. Then again, I suppose I might have been a little distracted too.
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
As someone unable to be distracted by half-dressed women, I thought the scene was excellent. [Razz]
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
Wait, there was dialogue in that scene?
 
Posted by Glenn Arnold (Member # 3192) on :
 
I loved the way Whiskey is messing with Topher's head. I thought the bed scene was appropriate for that. More important, though, was the line where Topher suggests she finds out who she really is, and she says she doesn't want to die. This bring to light the morality of creating people, only to eliminate them after using them briefly, when each and every person would choose to continue to live if they knew what "a treatment" really means.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
It's an interesting flipside to the anti-stem-cell research arguments, which would try to save every cell because it's a biological human. Is it more or less compelling to argue you should be trying to save every imprinted personality?
 
Posted by Glenn Arnold (Member # 3192) on :
 
Or even the components of a personality. Does it matter if you have a separate personality if the original people that they were composed of is still active? What happens when there are more than one copy of the same person? Don't they all want to remain alive in one continuous stream of consciousness? etc...
 
Posted by Shanna (Member # 7900) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Glenn Arnold:
More important, though, was the line where Topher suggests she finds out who she really is, and she says she doesn't want to die. This bring to light the morality of creating people, only to eliminate them after using them briefly, when each and every person would choose to continue to live if they knew what "a treatment" really means.

I think this scene and particularly that moment was one of the most powerful of the show's run so far. It made Whiskey/Saunders a more interesting character than Echo/Caroline has been for me yet. It rings more true and personable than the big scheme and plot involving the evolving Echo and Ballard. Their motives just seem so painfully idealistic and boring compared to Saunder's self-preservation.

It just makes me all the more upset that Amy Acker is going to be working on another show and likely getting less screen-time on Dollhouse.

Thankfully, it looks like Sierra is sticking around for awhile. I just ADORE her actress. No matter what imprint they give her, she just falls into it so believably. Can't we just get rid of Echo and Ballard and make Sierra and Victor the stars of the show?

Eliza's performance just isn't consistent for me and Ballard annoys me whenever he's on screen. I'm not sure what it is but something about his character/actor/whatever just bothers me. I don't even hate him. I'm just bored by him.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
This episode was actually the first time I was interested in all the characters. I do think Sierra is a better actress, but I thought Eliza has been doing a better job since the season finale. (I was impressed that I actually noticed subtle differences between her different personalities when she was Omega).

Echo/Ballard aren't interesting enough to carry the entire show, but they are interesting enough to keep the central plot moving forward now that the other characters are becoming more compelling.
 
Posted by Unmaker (Member # 1641) on :
 
After spending the first season sort of slogging through the episodes, waiting for the Whedon magic, I finally felt that I saw in this one what it is that he is trying to do with the series. As long as he stops treating Echo like she's Buffy, the hero and center of this universe, and continues to explore the other characters on the show, I'll keep tuning in.
 
Posted by MouetteSheridan (Member # 10098) on :
 
Huh. I've thoroughly enjoyed Eliza/Echo throughout Dollhouse, and think she's only gotten better with each episode. I find the character interesting, and her acting to me has been quite good throughout at showcasing all the different personalities. It surprises me to see several people commenting that she's their least favorite part of the show.

But then, I've had a girl-crush on Dushku since her Faith days, so maybe it isn't that surprising after all.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
She's amazing. Hell, she was amazing in True Lies when she was a little kid.
 
Posted by Shanna (Member # 7900) on :
 
Sorta random but...Alexis Denisof IS British, right?

I'm watching the first season of "How I Met Your Mother" and, just like in "Dollhouse," he's speaking with this really weird American accent. Everything I read online says he's an American native but his British accent sounds so believable (if alittle over the top) while his American accent sounds like nothing I've ever heard. During his scene in Dollhouse, it sounded to me like he was slipping between the two.

Am I just not used to hearing it?
 
Posted by Luet13 (Member # 9274) on :
 
Linky

He was born in the US, but lived in the UK for 13 years. That could explain his odd accent.

On another subject, I'm in the 'unimpressed with Eliza Dushku' camp. She has never done anything for me, including her role as Faith in Buffy and Angel. She just seems like a robot and a very weak actress to me.

I'm definitely enjoying this show for it's un-Eliza merits though. The Whedonness seems to be showing up finally. And like many others here, I could watch Amy Acker read the phone book and be happy.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
Shanna, watch any interview of him during Buffy or Angel and you'll see his 'real' voice. It freaked me out, because I only knew him with a British accent.
 
Posted by Magson (Member # 2300) on :
 
So... anyone besides me see last Friday's episode? I thought it was fascinating how they had Topher "change her on a glandular level" via just rewriting her programming.

The final scene between Echo and Ballard was wonderful, methought, especially when he offered that Topher could make her forget, but she refused saying she'd rather be sad than feel nothing at all, in spite of being in the tabula rasa state at the time.

I'm really fascinated to see where this is all going. I'm also wondering who's feeding info to the Senator and how that new story thread will pan out.

It was also nice to see Mellie/November/Madeline. I always really liked her, and I rather enjoyed her scene with Ballard as well, what with her not remembering him in any way and his trying not to slip up that he'd known her as an active.

Good ep!
 
Posted by Brinestone (Member # 5755) on :
 
I've been assuming the mole sending info to the senator is Ballard, but it's so obvious that now that you mention it, I realize it's probably not him.

I actually thought Mellie was the weakest part of the episode. I found myself bored watching the parts about her.

I thought Eliza acted the momma-bear instinct quite well. Even if there was indication that she drinks coffee and alcohol while nursing. [Razz]
 
Posted by Magson (Member # 2300) on :
 
That was the line from the previous week when the Senator gave his speech: Adelle asked Boyd who he thought was giving out the info, Ballard walks in, and Boyd said "We were just going to talk about you . . . . "

And Ballard denied being the mole, fingering Boyd instead.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
The only reason I don't think it's Ballard is because it's never the obvious choice with Whedon.

And I miss Amy Acker! I wanted to see her this time around... running around in a nightie, but still...
 
Posted by Brinestone (Member # 5755) on :
 
Hm. I'm starting to question whether the Dollhouse has done enough to cover its tracks. I mean, there's bound to be an investigation into the professor's death, and someone was bound to have seen them on their way to his office together.

Plus, Whiskey's out in the world somewhere, angry at the Dollhouse, and they're not even worried about her or looking for her? Doesn't she have a GPS chip too, which they could easily use to retrieve her? Plus, what's she going to do out there? She's a "doctor" with no history and no paperwork to prove her credentials.

And what happens with all the clients whose engagements end in a way they didn't expect (Echo's babydaddy, for one)? Is there some sort of clause that says, "We'll kill you if you say one word about this"? Even if there were, once someone talks, it's a little too late to off them.
 
Posted by Goody Scrivener (Member # 6742) on :
 
I think we just saw the beginnings of Epitaph One.

Poor Victor. He really got the short end there. And gee, wasn't it convenient for the story that "Dr. Saunders" authorized removal of his chip when they started his reconstructive work after Alpha's second attack. That whole thing did make me wonder about Whiskey's chip status as well.
 
Posted by Brinestone (Member # 5755) on :
 
I haven't seen Epitaph One. Maybe that would help.
 
Posted by Goody Scrivener (Member # 6742) on :
 
Probably not, Brinestone. It's set about 10 years in the future.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
We've been seeing the beginnings of Epitaph One since Grey Hour, but yeah, this was a significant step down the road.
 
Posted by Shanna (Member # 7900) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Goody Scrivener:
Poor Victor. He really got the short end there. And gee, wasn't it convenient for the story that "Dr. Saunders" authorized removal of his chip when they started his reconstructive work after Alpha's second attack. That whole thing did make me wonder about Whiskey's chip status as well.

I imagine that since Dr. Saunders did the removal for Victor (that's what they said, right?) that she took out her own chip before leaving, assuming she had one.
 
Posted by Brinestone (Member # 5755) on :
 
Okay, we've watched Epitaph One, and yeah, it does make a difference. Really, did they think they could control the technology forever without it leaking out?

I really liked last night's episode. Jon Boy was wondering how it fit in with that episode where a few of the dolls are imprinted with their own personalities so they can go back and confront the demons in their pasts that are affecting their ability to be good dolls. Where did Sierra go? Did we actually get to see?
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I can't remember who Sierra went to confront, if it wasn't the actual guy who "kidnapped" her it was at least someone relevant.

This was a pretty amazing episode. The one thing that has me a little iffy is the question... when exactly DID Topher get a conscience? It seemed to suddenly appear the week before. When he expressed concern about the psychopath, I was like "wait, Pot, Kettle black much?"

Anyways, now we evidently have a month to wait before the next episode and the appearance of Summer Glau. And word in TV Guide says this season is already looking like it's going to be a 12 episode one.
 
Posted by sarcasticmuppet (Member # 5035) on :
 
Heavy episode, but I really liked it. Boyd has quite a past, and I really, really want to know what it is.

I also thought Priya's last line before being wiped was very reminiscent of the Worthing Saga.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
yeah, I thought of Worthing Saga too.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Everything I've ready says Dollhouse is being pushed for a month because they don't want it messing up sweeps.

Then, it'll likely be canceled.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
What exactly is sweeps?
 
Posted by Corwin (Member # 5705) on :
 
Man, if they cancel it *now*, then they really messed up. I mean, this season is much better than the previous one; what were they aiming for? Or maybe their ratings don't reflect the series' improvement...
 
Posted by Vadon (Member # 4561) on :
 
The viewership ratings on TV are still pretty bad. I imagine it's on the way to cancellation. Which is a shame, yesterday's episode was glory on a silver plate.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
In the episode last year, Priya went to confront the man who put her in the Dollhouse (same guy/actor as this episode). At the time, I thought that if Adelle and Topher knew why she was in the Dollhouse and let it happen anyway, I could never empathize with them at all. Knowing now that they were fooled and even thought they were helping her, helped.

FOX has said they will air all 13 episodes. It's looking unlikely there will be more. Joss has said that the 13th episode will be able to server as either a show-ender or a lead in to more shows, if they get the chance.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Vadon:
yesterday's episode was glory on a silver plate.

I don't think that it's a coincidence that there wasn't much of Echo in this episode.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Raymond Arnold:
What exactly is sweeps?

A vast conspiracy to make TV suck.
 
Posted by Jon Boy (Member # 4284) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mr_porteiro_head:
quote:
Originally posted by Vadon:
yesterday's episode was glory on a silver plate.

I don't think that it's a coincidence that there wasn't much of Echo in this episode.
I was just thinking the same thing. Eliza Dushku isn't even in the same league as most of the other actors on the show.
 
Posted by Shigosei (Member # 3831) on :
 
I completely agree. I really wish we could see what Dollhouse would have been like with Dichen Lachman (Sierra) in the starring role instead of Eliza Dushku.

As a side note, I saw Dollhouse before watching much Buffy. Now that I've seen Faith, it seems to me that the characters she plays mostly all have the same tough girl personality, just with different motivations and skill sets. It's too bad, given that Dollhouse was supposed to show off her acting range.
 
Posted by Dogbreath (Member # 11879) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mr_porteiro_head:
I don't think that it's a coincidence that there wasn't much of Echo in this episode.

That, and because it was directed by the sublime Jonathan Frakes. His directing style is very noticeably different, and I for one thoroughly enjoy it.

Whenever I criticize the choice of making Eliza Dushku the lead character, people inevitably defend her by saying she's a competent actress... and that's really the whole problem. She's a decent, well experienced actress usually capable of giving a good performance... and she's surrounded by a cast profoundly talented actors, most of whom could act the pants off of her. I would have absolutely no issue with her as a side character, or even as one of the main characters in an ensemble cast. But Whedon has relentlessly insisted in making the entire show revolve around her character, to the point where the opening credits don't even show any other actor. And that's destroying the show.

I'll be sad when Dollhouse ends, especially now that I've seen just how powerful an episode can be when they *don't* focus on Echo/Caroline, but ultimately this isn't a failure that can be blamed on Fox's tampering. They were willing to give the show a second season... and Whedon squandered that opportunity by focusing on a lead character that nobody wants to follow.
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dogbreath]
Whenever I criticize the choice of making Eliza Dushku the lead character, people inevitably defend her by saying she's a competent actress... and that's really the whole problem. She's a decent, well experienced actress usually capable of giving a good performance... and she's surrounded by a cast profoundly talented actors, most of whom could act the pants off of her. I would have absolutely no issue with her as a side character, or even as one of the main characters in an ensemble cast. But Whedon has relentlessly insisted in making the entire show revolve around her character, to the point where the opening credits don't even show any other actor. And that's destroying the show.[/QB]

Indeed. Whedon put himself into a corner by selling the show to people on the basis of Echo/Dushku (which he had to since she was the one who had the contract with Fox that made the show possible.) This is why she can't be pushed aside as much as she deserves it.
 
Posted by Bella Bee (Member # 7027) on :
 
Of all the shows that needed to be a pure ensemble, with no 'main character', this premise was it.

There are some amazing actors, who can change their physicality and voice so completely that they seem to have transformed themselves into utterly new people.
Unfortunately, Dushku can't do that and it was unfair to expect her to - especially since her role was so complicated.
As you said, she's not a bad actress, but transformation obviously isn't her talent.

Having said that, I think it would have helped the audience to warm up to Echo if the base personality of Caroline had been at all likeable and interesting.
I have no idea why that choice was made and what purpose it served.

I still want to love this show, but it's just so flawed. It's unlikely to survive, as the ratings are even worse than the Sarah Connor Chronicles last summer, and we know what happened there.
I really do hope Joss will be back with something better soon though. I need my Joss fix.
 
Posted by Dogbreath (Member # 11879) on :
 
Oh, as long as he's alive, Joss Whedon will always have some hideously delightful brainchild or another in production. He's sort of like a virus; unless you kill it completely, it just adapts and grows more resilient in time. (and he also changes any organism he infects... everyone I know who's been exposed to his work seems to have an unhealthy level of attachment to him and his offspring)
 
Posted by Jon Boy (Member # 4284) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Shigosei:
It's too bad, given that Dollhouse was supposed to show off her acting range.

Oh, it did. There just wasn't much to show off.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
I really wish we could see what Dollhouse would have been like with Dichen Lachman (Sierra) in the starring role instead of Eliza Dushku.
I would have loved to see what Dollhouse would have been without Fox demanding that all of the dolls be young and hot.

quote:
Now that I've seen Faith, it seems to me that the characters she plays mostly all have the same tough girl personality
Yup. In fact, watching her on this show is a lot like watching her anywhere. Oh, now it's Echo as a mother, now it's Echo as a tough negotiator, now it's Echo as a ninja assassin, and now as an evil vampire slayer.

quote:
Whenever I criticize the choice of making Eliza Dushku the lead character, people inevitably defend her by saying she's a competent actress... and that's really the whole problem. She's a decent, well experienced actress usually capable of giving a good performance... and she's surrounded by a cast profoundly talented actors, most of whom could act the pants off of her. I would have absolutely no issue with her as a side character, or even as one of the main characters in an ensemble cast. But Whedon has relentlessly insisted in making the entire show revolve around her character, to the point where the opening credits don't even show any other actor. And that's destroying the show.

Indeed.

quote:
Of all the shows that needed to be a pure ensemble, with no 'main character', this premise was it.
Indeed.

quote:
I think it would have helped the audience to warm up to Echo if the base personality of Caroline had been at all likeable and interesting.
Indeed.

quote:
It's unlikely to survive, as the ratings are even worse than the Sarah Connor Chronicles last summer, and we know what happened there.
SCC was much more expensive to produce than Dollhouse.

I'm not one to keep watching a show I don't enjoy. But I still enjoy this show, and will keep watching it.
 
Posted by Dogbreath (Member # 11879) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mr_porteiro_head:
I would have loved to see what Dollhouse would have been without Fox demanding that all of the dolls be young and hot.

One gets the impression from this show that Joss Whedon has a very narrow criterion for what constitutes an attractive woman. Literally every single female on the show has more or less the same appearance: tall, dark complexion, long straight hair, very long and oval shaped face. It's very depressing if you're like me and aren't attracted to that physique. The only women I found at all attractive on the show were Sierra and Dewitt, and Olivia Williams is over twice my age! [Frown]

It would've been nice if they had just added a bit more variety. A fair skinned freckly redhead, or a buxom blond, or (god forbid!) a black woman or two would've made it a bit more interesting... the uniformity of appearance just added to the blandness. As is, I can't look at Eliza Dushku without thinking of a St. Bernard. I know her heavy lidded, slack jawed look is supposed to be mysterious and seductive, but it just reminds me of a big slobbering dog.

And it's made all the worse by the fact that the show sports beautiful men of all shapes and colors for the ladies! IMO it's unfortunate that tv shows now are willing to take male black protagonists seriously, but you almost never see a black female in a leading role. (and it'd be especially logical for the Dollhouse... what are you going to do when your clientele want something a little darker than the standard selection?)
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
Saw last week's episode yesterday on Hulu... It was brilliant! Sierra (I can't spell her real name) is truly amazing.

This is one of only three shows I watch regularly... and all three are at risk of cancellation. I'm cursed, I tell you!
 
Posted by Corwin (Member # 5705) on :
 
You should charge money to *not* watch shows that people like! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
Literally every single female on the show has more or less the same appearance
November doesn't fit the same mold, and she's as beautiful as anybody on the show.

[ October 25, 2009, 03:07 PM: Message edited by: mr_porteiro_head ]
 
Posted by Bella Bee (Member # 7027) on :
 
It doesn't make any sense that there wouldn't be any older dolls. What about all the rich young men with 'Graduate' fantasies,
or women who want to be swept off their feet by a silver haired fox?
Or the older people who want someone their own age, or to pretend that they've been married for fifty years?

And while November might not be a stick figure, she's not exactly huge, is she? What about the people who want someone really big?
Or a Little Person? Or a transsexual? They've got, presumably, at least 26 Dolls - there should be some serious variation.

They can change the doll's personalities, but they can't alter their bodies to that extent.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
quote:
They've got, presumably, at least 26 Dolls - there should be some serious variation.
25, I would imagine. I would seriously doubt they'd have another one named "Alpha"... [Smile]
 
Posted by Dogbreath (Member # 11879) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mr_porteiro_head:
November doesn't fit the same mold, and she's as beautiful as anybody on the show.

What's different?

Tall: check! (5' 9" according to imdb)
White: check!
Dark complexion: check!
Long oval face: check!
Long straight hair: check!

She's a little more busty and a bit more round faced. But she's the exact same mold. If she's really the Dollhouse's idea of "variety", it makes me very sad.
 
Posted by Shanna (Member # 7900) on :
 
So I'm finally caught up.

Its unfortunate that the show will be canceled after an episode like that. Topher is developing, Boyd is mysterious, and can I go all teen girl right now and say that Sierra and Victor are like totally OTP!

I feel like I'm finally getting the character drama I've wanted from this show for the past year. I love Joss Whedon for two things: the characters and the one-liners. I can live with the fact that this show dialogue-wise sounds nothing like "Firefly" or "Buffy" but the lack of interesting characters was making me question whether was blinded by my inner Whedon fangirl.

But its like the writers heard my prayers. They put the spotlight on my favorite characters and gave the ones I hated a week off. If there had been a scene with Whiskey, I'd be overjoyed.

But no doubt Ballard and Echo will be back next week hogging the story. And I'll be back to playing solitaire while I watch.
 
Posted by Brinestone (Member # 5755) on :
 
My greatest hope with this show is that it will jumpstart very busy and lucrative careers for the actors who play Sierra and Victor. They totally deserve it.
 
Posted by Geraine (Member # 9913) on :
 
Friday's episode about Sierra was one of the better episodes of the show. Possibly my second favorite.

Epitaph One was just so well put together that it has to be my favorite. That and it has one of my favorite characters (Whiskey) as well as Felicia Day in it.

Friday's episode gave us another glimpse at the beginning of Topher absolutely losing his mind as well. He says "Now I am talking to myself like Alpha." Looks like it is the beginning of the end.

Its a real shame that a show like this doesn't get a better time slot or the viewership it deserves, but because of the way the first half of the first season played out many people have already been turned off by it. The same thing happened with Terminator SCC. Fringe was in danger of this but they came back strong for the second half of the season.

I hope Dollhouse can pull out of this slump and continue on. I am really loving the show.

One question though.. In Epitaph One the ending sequence confused me. The characters climb up a ladder towards the top of the building they are in. Why? I fail to see how that is going to help them get to safety. Is there a helicopter up there? Is it just symbolism? Are there walkways that connect the buildings?

If I missed something let me know. I loved the episode but that last part confused me.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
quote:
One question though.. In Epitaph One the ending sequence confused me. The characters climb up a ladder towards the top of the building they are in. Why? I fail to see how that is going to help them get to safety. Is there a helicopter up there? Is it just symbolism? Are there walkways that connect the buildings?
I found that kind of confusing because it was my understanding that the Dollhouse was underground in the first place: in "Epitath One" they do descend from ground level in to the Dollhouse main chamber, and in "Omega" Ballard and Alpha descend in to it as well.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
Its a real shame that a show like this doesn't get a better time slot or the viewership it deserves, but because of the way the first half of the first season played out many people have already been turned off by it. The same thing happened with Terminator SCC.
I turned back in for the 2nd season of T:SCC, but didn't last long.

quote:
n Epitaph One the ending sequence confused me. The characters climb up a ladder towards the top of the building they are in. Why? I fail to see how that is going to help them get to safety. Is there a helicopter up there? Is it just symbolism?
I'm going with "symbolism".
 
Posted by kmbboots (Member # 8576) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Geraine:



Its a real shame that a show like this doesn't get a better time slot or the viewership it deserves, but because of the way the first half of the first season played out many people have already been turned off by it. The same thing happened with Terminator SCC. Fringe was in danger of this but they came back strong for the second half of the season.


And a better lead in show.
 
Posted by Geraine (Member # 9913) on :
 
I agree, all actors in Fringe > Eliza Dushku

Nobody beats Walter...Nobody.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
Dollhouse won't be airing in November

Oy!

And the last episode was excellent. [Frown]
 
Posted by Geraine (Member # 9913) on :
 
It says it will return after sweeps......

Anyone want to wager it just won't return?

On a side note, NBC is thinking about bringing Chuck back early, and the only timeslot available right now is on Friday night, the same hour Dollhouse is on.

I love Dollhouse but I do love me some Chuck.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
It will return.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
It will return, but they're going to burn it until the end of the season: two episodes a day, back to back.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
[Frown] It is cancelled [Frown]
 
Posted by daventor (Member # 11981) on :
 
I just read the news. It sucks, but I really can't blame Fox on this one (still bitter at whoever was responsible for Firefly getting canned, though). They gave it a second season, but the numbers just were not good at all. As much as I enjoyed what I saw of it, there was never a large enough audience. It's business.
That said, I hope whatever the next big project is for Joss, I hope it's not with Fox. He needs to go Cable, I think.

On the bright side, Joss can get working full-time on Dr. Horrible 2 now.
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
Right now they're finishing episode 11. That means episodes 12 and 13 will be made with the knowledge that they'll be the end of the series. Whedon better make them epic.
 
Posted by kmbboots (Member # 8576) on :
 
We can blame Fox for sticking it on Friday.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kmbboots:
We can blame Fox for sticking it on Friday.

...in the time-slot of death, no less.
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
We should also blame Whedon and his writers for making 70% of the episodes sucky.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
Well, the first 5 of the first season was really Fox's fault. They kept Whedon on a pretty tight leash. And it took him a few episodes to recover.

I'm still blaming Fox.
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
There's still 9 episodes of season 2 we haven't seen so it may be too soon to speak of percentage of sucky episodes vs non-sucky episodes. Still though...

quote:
Well, the first 5 of the first season was really Fox's fault
It didn't sound like Whedon fought for otherwise. He actually sold the idea of those episodes being stand-alone as a good thing.
 
Posted by kmbboots (Member # 8576) on :
 
And wasn't the whole focus too much on Dushku's Echo problem because she had the deal with Fox?
 
Posted by daventor (Member # 11981) on :
 
Yeah, Eliza Dushku has a deal with Fox for a tv show, so she set up with Joss Whedon to make a show around her.

I know Fox put them in the Friday "Death Slot," but, really, I'm still not sure Dollhouse would have found its audience if put on at another time, or with better advertising, or whatever. Entertainment's subjective, and it seems like Dollhouse (even though I thought it was a great scifi show) didn't do it for a lot of people.
 
Posted by daventor (Member # 11981) on :
 
Oh, here's Joss Whedon's comments on the cancellation, posted today on whedonesque.com:

"Hmm. Apparently my news is not news.

I don't have a lot to say. I'm extremely proud of the people I've worked with: my star, my staff, my cast, my crew. I feel the show is getting better pretty much every week, and I think you'll agree in the coming months. I'm grateful that we got to put it on, and then come back and put it on again.

I'm off to pursue internet ventures/binge drinking. Possibly that relaxation thing I've read so much about. By the time the last episode airs, you'll know what my next project is. But for now there's a lot of work still to be done, and disappointment to bear.

Thank you all for your support, your patience, your excellent adverts. See you again. -j."
 
Posted by Shmuel (Member # 7586) on :
 
At the risk of sounding like a broken record, who but Fox would even give Whedon a chance? They get a lot of flak for cancelling more brilliant shows than any other network, but that's largely because they give a chance to more brilliant shows than all the other broadcast networks combined.

(Personally, I watched the first episode, and... well, maybe I'll watch the DVDs someday. They're pretty low on my list, though.)
 
Posted by katharina (Member # 827) on :
 
I blame the original crappy concept - I never wanted to see a show about a collection of Barbie dolls. The very concept means that the main characters are mostly/often/usually passive. I don't find that interesting.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Kath, have you actually seen the show (and more than the first five episodes which were indeed similar to what you describe)? While I must admit that the show (and most advertisements for it) lend themselves well to exactly that kind of misinterpretation, it's not at all what the show is like.

Here is a review of dollhouse from a feminist perspective that I think is pretty interesting and does a good job of explaining the point of the show.

The cliff notes version is that in order to tell a meaningful story about the nature of power and patriarchy and consent, your metaphors need to address how all-encompassing the power disparities in the world actually are, and how they affect us from birth to the point that we can't even identify them. Yes, the doll characters begin the show devoid of "character," but that's because the overarching plot is for them to reclaim their identities.

Perhaps Whedon spent a more time than was necessary in season one establishing the "status quo," but I can see why he did it - to try and make it sink in exactly how powerless the characters are to change the system. Even those who theoretically CONTROL the system. We've already seen one flashforward of the future (the 13th episode of Season 1) and it is the characters who start with the least power who ultimately are the most active about saving everyone else.

Eliza Dushku never quite grows into the role she's supposed to play, but that's okay, because even though she's only an average actress the others in the show are phenomenal. (Victor and Sierra in particular are amazing)

It may be that you won't like the show anyway, but you shouldn't be ignoring it for the reasons you've stated.
 
Posted by katharina (Member # 827) on :
 
The show is okay if you look past the central concept and ignore more than half the episodes? That's a show with problems. If Epitaph One was a glimpse of the future where things are cool, why can't I watch THAT show?

Secondly, sadly, Eliza Dushku, while admirable in many ways, isn't a good enough actress to pull it off.

I LOVE anaylyzing texts for cultural meaning - it's my favorite part of pop culture. But something that is meaningful or enjoyable or useful ONLY after the analysis or the explanation of why it is "deep" is a show that doesn't stand on its own. Like Alexander Pope said, "A work of art that contains theories is like an object on which the price tag has been left."
 
Posted by katharina (Member # 827) on :
 
P.S. I would be willing to watch a "greatest hits" DVD of it, but life is too short to watch unenjoyable stuff just out of affection for better stuff. I'd rather just rewatch Buffy and Firefly.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
Kat,

But don't you remember how painful the first season of Buffy was? Not just a few episodes, but the entire season.
 
Posted by katharina (Member # 827) on :
 
But even painful, bad season one Buffy is fundamentally more interesting that the premise of Dollhouse.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
I beg to disagree.
 
Posted by Dogbreath (Member # 11879) on :
 
I thought Buffy season 1 was hilarious. But then, I was genuinely convinced that it was meant to be a deliberately campy comedy, making fun of the horror genre.

Season 2 took me by surprise.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
quote:
The show is okay if you look past the central concept and ignore more than half the episodes?
The central concept is not bad - my point is that the central concept lends itself easily to misinterpretation by people who haven't seen the show.

The only episodes that are universally agreed as disappointing at the first five. Episode six of Season 1 functions somewhat as a "second pilot" and is the point at which Joss gained significantly more creative control over the show. I do think it might be necessary to watch the very first episode just so you have a better sense of who the characters WERE, before episode 6 starts showing you what they become. The first episode isn't amazing but wasn't bad, and I thought it was interesting from episode 6 onward. (It does jump up an order of magnitude of interesting-ness in season 2, but it's not really possible to skip to there).

Edit: I am the 666th poster in this thread. Yay?
 
Posted by Bella Bee (Member # 7027) on :
 
I'm not surprised about this. The show always seemed to be missing something - it was so close to being great, but there was something intangible missing from the mix. It just wasn't that special yet, but I expect that season 3 would have been amazing.

After the demise of Sarah Connor last year, I stopped watching Dollhouse because I knew it was just a matter of time until this happened, so I didn't want to get attached.
I hope that they can at least tie up some loose ends before curtain time.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
It seems to me that if everyone gives up on shows because we know they'll get cancelled eventually... isn't that just contributing to the problem? And no matter how much it sucked that Sarah Connor was lost, I don't regret my time watching it.

In the case of Dollhouse, Joss is clearly approaching with the expectation that he COULD get cancelled at any moment. Season 1 ended in such a way that even if that was it, it could have been a complete series, and some interviews have suggested that Season 2 is similarly structured. I wouldn't worry about feeling like the time spent watching it is a waste.
 
Posted by Shanna (Member # 7900) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dogbreath:
I thought Buffy season 1 was hilarious. But then, I was genuinely convinced that it was meant to be a deliberately campy comedy, making fun of the horror genre.

Season 2 took me by surprise.

This.

I greatly prefer season one to the final season. The high school years ending with graduation was my favorite of the big arcs (to be followed by the college years and the adult years.) The later seasons had some brilliant moments, of course, but I think the whole campy "hellmouth as a metaphor for high school" was what made the show for me. Its what got me hooked.
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
Whedon interview.

Gosh, Whedon. Of course network television execs wouldn't have felt comfortable with the sort of overt sexuality you were going for.

Sexuality in network television is almost ways childish. It's either played for laughs or is that sort of romantic PG 13 stuff that you can find in any day time soap opera...some hunky guy with his shirt off passionately kissing a gal. Anything deeper than that is a no no. Heck, it's a surprise he got away with the Companion character on Firefly, and if that show grew in popularity that character and what she does would most certainly have been ditched (of course Whedon would have just solved that by killing off the character.)

Point is, Whedon miscalculated big time. The concept that he describes sounds like prime SHOWTIME material and taboo on regular networks.

Also, bump.

edit: typo

[ December 04, 2009, 03:27 AM: Message edited by: Clive Candy ]
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
But the network bought it with the original description, and then got cold feet. That's the annoying bit.

I don't think Inara would have changed her profession. Whedon stood fast on certain things, such as when the network wanted Wash and Zoe to have other romantic entanglements and he flatly said no and was willing to walk because he wanted at least one solid married relationship on television. She might have died, though, every Whedon character faces that possibility.

I agree though, this show would have been better served on Showtime both for subject matter, ratings expectation, and network support (look! I agreed with Clive about something!).
 
Posted by MidnightBlue (Member # 6146) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Clive Candy:
Whedon interview.

Sexuality in network television is always almost ways childish.

What is this sentence supposed to say? There's either a missing word or a wrong word, and I can't figure out how it's supposed to read.

Also, thanks for the article link. It's cool to hear what's coming up.
 
Posted by Dobbie (Member # 3881) on :
 
...is almost always childish.
 
Posted by Sterling (Member # 8096) on :
 
Sexuality on television doesn't have to be "explicit" to deal with the subject seriously. But often just dealing with the subject seriously is more than network brass is willing to handle. You can have an ensemble cast that jumps into the sack with one another in every possible combination in a sitcom played for laughs, but heaven help you if you try to touch on why a character is doing so and if some of what they're seeking from their sexual relationships is peculiar or troubling or unhealthy... Let alone that it be any of the above and still something that they might have in common with the viewing audience.
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
*speculation for episode 9*

Who wants to bet that they're wrong about the senator's wife being a sleeper?

It's that Burke guy who's the sleeper.
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Clive Candy:
It's that Burke guy who's the sleeper.

[Frown]
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
A comment on the website tvbythenumbers:
quote:
Whedon may not be in denial about the ratings (I doubt even Glenn Beck could muster that level of denial), but he’s still in denial over the show itself. It wasn’t always awful, but it was never very good. And it wasn’t just FOX that had a problem with the ‘cuddly whoremongers’ angle–his own diehard fanbase frequently had problems with it as well. Even on Whedonesque, a lot of people have been quietly rooting for Dollhouse to end, so Joss can get back to the kind of show they want from him.

If he wanted to do a really edgy show with lots of sex, why was he on FOX at all? They titillate, sure–that’s not the same thing as following through. They looked at what he gave them, and they knew they had a ratings loser–that’s why they backed away, but they still gave him plenty of time, and lots of promotion.

It was a concept very poorly suited to a network primetime show, and frankly, I doubt Whedon’s take on it would have worked on HBO or Showtime.

No excuses–nobody forced him at gunpoint to pitch this concept to FOX, or to pitch it to anybody. He wanted to do a new show, he had a relationship with FOX and with Dushku, and Dushku had a development contract with FOX. He went there because he knew he could sell it there. He isn’t a very adventurous showrunner, when you get right down to it–he works with 20th or Universal, because he’s got friends at both studios. He can’t work without a cheering section. And that limits him horribly.

His approach to the most unconventional subjects is always very conventional and TeeVee101. He makes good use of old cliches, at the very best of times. His characters are always CHARACTERS–they never feel like real people, and they speak a slightly elevated dialect of sitcom-ese, all wisecracks and one-liners.

Firefly was a WORSE show, IMO. Dollhouse at least tried something different. But the fact that he wanted to get basically legitimize prostitution in both shows is–well–kinda creepy. Yes, he’s saying, the Dollhouse is wrong, but it COULD be made right. No it couldn’t, Joss. And you way miscalculated when you tried to make us like these scummy people who belong in jail. David Chase managed that trick, sure–but he never tried to sugarcoat what his gangsters really were, and he showed them warts and all. Nobody on your shows is allowed so much as a pimple.

Spot on! Except about Firefly sucking.

source
 
Posted by sarcasticmuppet (Member # 5035) on :
 
The Firefly sucking part proved to me the guy had no taste.

I'll admit freely, Dollhouse got off to a slow start. I won't even say it's the network's fault. More recent episodes have more than made up for it.

Joss nailed on the head why the network was against the sexual fantasy aspect of it. TV only does sex when it's a joke (Seinfeld, Friends, How I Met Your Mother, I could go on forever). Joss was actually trying to explore something and make people think. Big No-no.

I liked this last episode, though perhaps not as much as some others. Summer Glau's character is quite creepy.
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
You know there were two, right?

And oh yea, Enver Gjokaj is the most talented actor on the show.
 
Posted by Dogbreath (Member # 11879) on :
 
quote:

I liked this last episode, though perhaps not as much as some others. Summer Glau's character is quite creepy. [/QB]

Well, it certainly is a big change from all the healthy, happy, well adjusted characters she's played before.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Yeah, they had mentioned earlier that she wouldn't be playing a doll because "she'd like to play a normal girl for once before she does of old age." I did like her character here (especially once the beautifully awkward conversations with Topher began) but it certainly didn't deliver on "normal."
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Also, do we know if Summer will be showing up at all for the rest of the series?
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
I hope so! I enjoyed her scenes with Topher SO MUCH.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
What I wasn't quite sure of was whether her "mutual" crush on Topher was just an act - did she see through him from the very beginning and was merely manipulating him? Or when she said "now we're even" was it intended as a genuinely playful flirt?
 
Posted by Elmer's Glue (Member # 9313) on :
 
From the way she acted before he showed up (the way she fixed her hair, her reaction when she saw the Disruptor) I'd say she is genuinely interested in him.
 
Posted by Goody Scrivener (Member # 6742) on :
 
Or at least in his tech.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Clive Candy:
And oh yea, Enver Gjokaj is the most talented actor on the show.

God, yes. He was so absolutely Topher.
 
Posted by MidnightBlue (Member # 6146) on :
 
He did an excellent job. He sounded surprisingly like Shaggy (from Scooby Doo), though.
 
Posted by Goody Scrivener (Member # 6742) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lisa:
quote:
Originally posted by Clive Candy:
And oh yea, Enver Gjokaj is the most talented actor on the show.

God, yes. He was so absolutely Topher.
That was absolutely awesome. I wasn't looking at the screen at first, and I honestly thought Topher was talking to himself. I think the best part of that one was Victor/Topher in the chair and Real!Topher next to him, talking simultaneously to Adele.
 
Posted by Glenn Arnold (Member # 3192) on :
 
Nothing against Enver's performance, but I'm pretty sure he was lip syncing.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
The voice sounded different enough to me (and Enver has demostrated enough prior awesomeness) that I'm willing to assume it was really him. Voice actors can sound like all kinds of different people.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
He was not lip syncing. That was all Enver.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
He was so not lip synching.
 
Posted by Shanna (Member # 7900) on :
 
Victor as Topher bantering with the real Topher...totally made up for the horrible first half of season one. It was like a special gift from Joss to the fans. And I accept his apology.

I'm liking the show alot more now and I'm starting to regret its end. I was pleased to see more of Langton and November/Mellie/whoever, and even found myself rooting for Ballard which is very unusual.

I can't stand Alexis (Perrin) though. I loved him on Buffy and Angel but the accent thing takes me completely out of the moment. He's fine for the most part. The Britishness of his voice works for someone from a privileged background but then he'll randomly throw out a word with these wonky vowels and it spoils the character for me. Still, its mere presence on the show proves Joss' loyalty to his actors and gives me hope that we'll see my Dollhouse favorites in the future.

As for Summer...I have such a girl!crush on her. She's so adorable. You know, when she's not absolutely terrifyingly crazy.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
Um.

The British accent from Buffy was fake. Alexis Denisof is American. He was born in Maryland.
 
Posted by Alcon (Member # 6645) on :
 
Yeah, I thought that was true. I remember hearing him on the interviews and going, huh, what?

So why does he still have it when he's supposed to be playing an american senator?
 
Posted by Elmer's Glue (Member # 9313) on :
 
He doesn't sound British, but he doesn't sound American either. It's very distracting.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
Denisof moved to England when he was 17. So his early adult years were spent there. He grew up in Seattle, so what you're hearing is a hybrid of Seattle/London. If you're not used to it, you keep expecting it to be one or the other, and the mixture clashes.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I just thought he was a bad actor.
 
Posted by Jon Boy (Member # 4284) on :
 
Yeah, same here. I think he might even be worse than Eliza Dushku.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jon Boy:
Yeah, same here. I think he might even be worse than Eliza Dushku.

I enjoy her acting. Look, there are a lot of people who aren't the best actors in the world. Johnny Depp and Jody Foster (to give two classic examples) are different people every time they play different characters. They're great actors. Someone like Eliza Dushku or Robert Deniro or John Cusack, who is always basically the same character with different veneers isn't in the same class as Depp and Foster, it's true. But I love watching Dushku and Cusack in pretty much everything I've seen them in. I loved Tru Calling and was way bummed that it got cancelled. Same with Dollhouse, and not just because of Dushku in either case.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I don't have a huge problem with Eliza, except that in this show she's given a way bigger job than she can handle (it was particularly evident in the psychopath episode, where Victor nailed the guy completely, and hell, nailed Echo's character too, and Echo just pretty much read the lines). The fact that she has such an important job and is outclassed by people doing similar but theoretically "less important" jobs gets distracting.

That said, I think the Senator is way worse than Echo is. I didn't mind Echo in the last two episodes, but the Senator drove me nuts.
 
Posted by Alcon (Member # 6645) on :
 
Yeah, when Victor was the psychopath he was exactly it. When Echo was... I just had Faith flashbacks. I kept expecting her to say "five by five".
 
Posted by Shanna (Member # 7900) on :
 
I'm with Ray. Its not that they're not good actors, but not everyone can take on any role thrown at them.

I loved Eliza as Faith and Alexis as Wesley. I think they both did a great job exploring those characters. But Eliza has a "type." Nothing wrong with that. Lots of actors embrace a certain type of role and are able to thrive doing that kind of work. Other actors are able to be chameleons and no doubt some of them often have a harder time getting cast and being recognizable in their work.

I'm glad Joss has such a good relationship with Eliza and wanted to believe she could do well in a part like Echo, but unfortunately she's fallen short. She does have her moments though and hopefully it'll help her develop her skills abit for the next project she lands.

Alexis should just stick to using his British accent. And why not?? He's great at it. He's got a strength and so he should work it. Its unfortunate that there isn't a high demand for British characters on American television, but that's just the way it is and I can't imagine he's winning over alot of people with a hybrid accent he can't control.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
On a someone unrelated note, I think this is the first time someone called me Ray instead of spelling out my entire screen name "Raymond Arnold."
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
Personally I would have loved to have seen Dollhouse with Amy Acker in the lead role.
 
Posted by Magson (Member # 2300) on :
 
I loved the "Topher Twofer" -- completely hilarious!

I especially loved the exchange:

"Glasses?"

"On a chain!"

"For the WIN!!!!!!!!!"


I just about wet myself, I was laughing so hard.

It was also cute to see the little blush and smile from Summer when Topher was explaining that he thought she was a Doll due to what he thought was her similar situation to Whiskey/Saunders in the Los Angeles House, and she said "But to be a Doll you have to be beautiful" and he went "Uh. . yeah!"

That had to be the weirdest "successful chemistry" I think I've ever seen.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
These last two episodes really bugged me. Echo finally starts getting her personality back, and the first thing she does is fall gaga over Ballard?

I'm kind amused that they skip over the entire buildup of chemistry two. Probably in part due to early cancellation and time constraints, but I don't think their chemistry has been that great and I suspect that it was easier to sell us on the idea of them falling in actual love if we didn't have to watch the actors awkwardly pretending to.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
When you say Echo gets her personality back, what do you mean? Caroline's? The sum of her imprints? Or this new person called Echo? I had no problem with them (Ballard and Echo) having this sexual tension. Ballard was her handler, and he honesty wants to protect her, and I think he's in love with Caroline, not Echo. Echo may be in love with Ballard, but I'm pretty sure Caroline is not.

These last two episodes felt a little rushed, which is not surprising, but I like the increase in dramatic plot events and *OMFG* moments. And I laughed out loud several times, and felt a comfort in that Whedonesque humor that I miss so much.

And it's strange. I don't care about Echo, but I care about Topher and Boyd and Adelle, and which Whiskey/Amy Acker would come back. I miss her. Oh, and I love Alpha. He's just plain fun.

And most of all, these two episodes make me want to go back and rewatch Firefly. Oh, how I miss Firefly.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
I like the fact that even Echo doesn't like Caroline. Maybe we'll be lucky and not have to see Caroline again. Echo is a better person. And as far as her falling for Ballard, they share values. Both of them have an innate need to help victims. Caroline had that as well, but it'd been warped by her privileged upbringing (I'm guessing) into the kind of "helping" that doesn't care who suffers in the process.

Sharing that kind of value is exactly the kind of thing that can bring people together.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
To clarify, I DO think there's a lot of interesting potential in the Ballard/Echo/Alpha love story. But the way they went about it didn't feel like they earned it at all.

What irked me about it is that, back in the early days of the show, there was a lot of criticism about how "feminist" Joss Whedon was making a show that A) was about characters that didn't have a personality of their own, and B) that it was blatantly exploitive of women.

And Joss' response was that the purpose of the show was to talk about A) since so much of our identify is shaped by the system around us, how can we find ourselves? and B) it's intended, among other things, as the sort of feminist allegory that actually deals with how oppressive the world really is. The bad guy isn't a monster you can stab with stake and be done with it, it's an all encompassing, exploitive force that warps both yourself and everyone who might be trying to help you.

I like that idea a lot. And for the most part I like what the show has done with it. I particularly liked how the show suggested that Ballard's obsession with Caroline was unhealthy, and that he was using her to act out a fantasy just as much as a dollhouse client.

But what bugged me is that we are finally hitting the point where Echo (and I mean, Echo, not Caroline) is establishing herself as her own person - a point in the show where, if it's intended to be the kind of feminist allegory that was suggested earlier, I'd think that Echo wouldn't be acting so clichéd-ly in love with the man who rescued her. She's completely acting out the fantasy he wanted her to - throwing herself at him even when he's trying to be restrained, so when he finally does go for it he doesn't have to feel so guilty.

I do, however, like the little wrench thrown in - in his mind, the fantasy has always been rescuing Caroline, and the person he found isn't Caroline and doesn't want to be and may be a better person than Caroline was.

A while back I linked to a feminist blog that talked about Dollhouse in Season 1. Recently she wrote an updated review about Season 2. I don't entirely agree with this one, but it still had some interesting stuff. My favorite single part was this:

quote:
In my original post on Dollhouse, I praised it for its use of the “false consciousness” metaphor. What I did not mention is that “false consciousness,” as an actual political theory, often drives me a wee bit insane! The idea that there is some true, pure self, untouched and unconstructed by the Patriarchy, which you can have access to by reading the right books or attending the right classes or being subjected to enough terrifyingly condescending consciousness-raising and/or personal judgment by ladies who Know What’s Good For You (I’m just gonna call them Ballardettes. That cool?) is incredibly naive and incomplete: it ignores the fact that we are all informed by cultural context from day one, and will be for the rest of our lives. Dollhouse is, undeniably, a story about the journey from lack of agency (being so totally shaped by the cultural context that you have no power to resist it) to agency (defining who you are on your own terms). But it’s not about going back to who you were before culture. It’s not about being outside of culture. There is no outside, there is no before. Caroline doesn’t live here any more.

But Echo does. She’s gaining agency, even within the context of the Dollhouse: she remembers everything, she “is many people” – but, she says, “none of them are me.” She isn’t regaining her “true” self; she’s creating a new self, out of all the roles she’s ever had. And this is a far better metaphor for “false consciousness” than just becoming Caroline again. There is no false consciousness, only incomplete consciousness. You don’t get to escape into some realm of culture-free authenticity in order to claim your own power. You claim it starting right now, right here. From where and who you already are.

The full thing can be found here.
 
Posted by Alcon (Member # 6645) on :
 
This may have been addressed in the show already, but why don't they just use clones for the actives?

I don't know why that never occurred to me until now - but why do they have to take already existent people? Why not just make clones of people?

I mean if they can develop the active technology they could certainly develop cloning technology in such a way as to provide themselves with an essentially infinite supply of attractive, strong and durable bodies to use as actives.

And if they could do that, they could just clone themselves a super-powered army to take over the world...

Now that I've thought of this, if feels like a bit of a plot hole in the whole show. Even though I'm sure they'd explain it away with some technobabble about how active technology and cloning technology are incompatible or something along those lines.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Well, cloning technology would still take X number of years to grow an active while human slavery is relatively easy (as in there is still a lot of human trafficking going on in the world and for relatively cheap).
 
Posted by Alcon (Member # 6645) on :
 
quote:
Well, cloning technology would still take X number of years to grow an active while human slavery is relatively easy (as in there is still a lot of human trafficking going on in the world and for relatively cheap).
However, cloning would absolve all worries of where there actives come from. Would solve the problems inherent in the active contracts and lengths and would provide an infinite supply of actives. Also - with no contract, no person waiting to get their body back... they could do essentially whatever they liked with the bodies.

Although you could argue that the whole point of the show is that cloned actives would still be people.

And I dunno, with the proper application of their apparently brilliant minds, and extraordinary amount of resources - I'm sure they could develop cloning technology and infrastructure that would be just as cheap as human slavery. Not to mention the increase in available bodies and decrease in work and stress in trying to find one.
 
Posted by Geraine (Member # 9913) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
Well, cloning technology would still take X number of years to grow an active while human slavery is relatively easy (as in there is still a lot of human trafficking going on in the world and for relatively cheap).

What would you define as human trafficking? Slavery? It is made known in the show that these people know exactly what they are getting into. They are told that if they do this for five years then at the end they will be paid a huge sum of money, and that they will not remember anything that happened to them. Can it really be considered human trafficking if they sign up for it?
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Alcon: Except Rossum as a whole doesn't really worry too much about what they can or cannot do with the bodies. And in Epitaph One, they switch to never giving the bodies back anyways.

Besides, human slavery is cheap, like really cheap. As in:
quote:
About 50,000 Asian, Latin American and Eastern European women and children are trafficked into the United States for sexual exploitation, the going rate between $12,000 and $18,000 each.
http://socyberty.com/activism/statistics-of-modern-day-slavery/

In fact, I think I've seen lower in other places in the world. I'm just not seeing the benefit from a corporate POV.
 
Posted by Alcon (Member # 6645) on :
 
quote:
In fact, I think I've seen lower in other places in the world. I'm just not seeing the benefit from a corporate POV.
Infinite and customizable supply. As many Echo's and Whiskey's as needed. And when the bodies get too battered, just clone up another. Plus I'm willing to bet that producing clones - aside from start up costs and research - would be much cheaper than $10,000 a pop.

Also Rossum is paying huge sums at the end of contracts. And then they have to worry about the former active spilling what they know - potentially. Not the actual price of human trafficking.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Geraine:
My point isn't that what the Dollhouse is doing is human trafficking* (or that it is not). My point is merely that if cost or limited supply was actually an important factor in obtaining new actives, they could very easily increase their supply of actives by an incredible (and cheap) rate by simply tapping into the pre-existing supply of human trafficking.

* Although I would note in your line of argument unrelated to mine that technically some of these people do not in fact know what they're getting into, Sierra is the obvious example.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Alcon:
quote:
In fact, I think I've seen lower in other places in the world. I'm just not seeing the benefit from a corporate POV.
Infinite and customizable supply. As many Echo's and Whiskey's as needed. And when the bodies get too battered, just clone up another.
It wouldn't be infinite. You still need a handler for each active and 1 Topher-like genius staff member. In order to keep handlers working in such a morally dubious environment and keep their secrets, they probably can't be making less than, say 100K. As for Topher, based on his intelligence on the show, he could easily be making millions per year in some think-tank or startup, so say 10 million per year. And the Dollhouse has, what, maybe 30 actives at each location?

So consider the costs in the human trafficking scenario. Even if they cost $10K/year each then that would be only $300,000, a mere 2% of the running cost so far without taking into account the technology and salaries of the other underlings, and any overhead.

The limiting step in the supply wouldn't be the cost of actives, it would be the Bennett/Topher-like super-geniuses and to a lesser extent, the handlers and other overhead. Arguably, there are also benefits to keeping the supply low because many of the potential customers *like* how exclusive and rare the actives are and would be willing to pay to keep it that way.

So this is the potential cost that cloning would need to beat out. It just doesn't seem compelling.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Aside from which, waiting 20 years for a clone just seems silly to me when they can already (apparently) acquire as many actives as they need.

The more I watch the more I am bothered by the homogenousness of the actives though (this was mentioned earlier but I hadn't noticed how ridiculous it is. Upwards of 80% of the female actives are slim brunettes. Even ignoring that some people are into heavier women, you'd think they'd have a better mixture of redheads and blondes and non-white people.
 
Posted by TheGrimace (Member # 9178) on :
 
Not only would you need to wait the 20 years for the clones to develop, but presumably you (Rossum) would have to pay for that development time. Even if somehow you can just do some kind of test-tube-like setup rather than raising them as actual human beings, the cost of that 20 year development, facilities, supervision etc is non-trivial. And even if you had such methodologies, what's to say that they would be capable of creating psychologically and physiologically compatible actives?

If instead you raise them as normal people, you now have a greater likelihood of creating compatible actives, but probably incur far more cost to have some kind of fostering system set up.

Assuming it would be possible to clone people in a way that would make them acceptable actives I think there's no reason to believe it would be more efficient than their current methods. Especially given that we have no guarantee that they actually fulfill their end of the bargain. Apart from November, we have very few concrete references to former actives out in the world... they could always just box them up in the attic or something, and save the "big payout" after however many years they want to use them for...
 
Posted by Alcon (Member # 6645) on :
 
We're assuming the same technological genius that invented active technology applied to cloning and they can't find a way to speed clone development?

We're also assuming the same resources, so it would be easy enough for them to set up massive incubators such that they didn't have to worry so much about the growth time - such as there is.

And you're telling me that the further control offered by cloning technology: exact physical control over the bodies of their actives (they could produce - in theory - as many actives in any size, shape or physique as they needed) isn't going to overwhelm any cost downsides? Along with the fact that it would probably wind up cheaper in the long run given the not having to worry about the cost of the active's pay packages or keeping them quiet when they leave. And the fact that you could use each active for much longer, and not worry about using it up.

Also, given their apparent inclination toward world domination - you don't think a cloned army that listens to their exact orders and commands and has genius level skills wouldn't be tempting for them?

I dunno, I just don't see how they wouldn't think of these applications of cloning technology when mixed with active technology. It would give you the ability to literally produce people who are basically super human and totally subservient. And to produce as many of them as you pleased.

I mean, in theory they could do similar things by just using the existing population - but that doesn't offer nearly as much control to produce the exact physique you're looking for. It also doesn't offer exacting control over the supply of bodies. I really don't see how they wouldn't want to mix the two technologies.
 
Posted by Geraine (Member # 9913) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
Geraine:
My point isn't that what the Dollhouse is doing is human trafficking* (or that it is not). My point is merely that if cost or limited supply was actually an important factor in obtaining new actives, they could very easily increase their supply of actives by an incredible (and cheap) rate by simply tapping into the pre-existing supply of human trafficking.

* Although I would note in your line of argument unrelated to mine that technically some of these people do not in fact know what they're getting into, Sierra is the obvious example.

Ah, you are right, I had almost forgotten about Sierra.

As for cloning Whiskeys? I'd order three.
 
Posted by kmbboots (Member # 8576) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Geraine:

As for cloning Whiskeys? I'd order three.

Neat!
 
Posted by TheGrimace (Member # 9178) on :
 
Alcon, don't get me wrong, there would certainly be benefits to your cloning program, I'm just not certain how clear-cut the trade study would be. After-all, if they diverted their Tophers and Bennetts from the brain-side of things then the imprinting technology would slow down... Additionally, it's not clear the timeframe involved here. In my mind, they only recently (within the last 10 years) developed the active technology, and they'd only be able to keep it secret for so long...

So there's probably a window of 2-4 decades when the Dollhouse can exist as it currently does, which is probably also as long as it would take (optimistically) to get a working clone production program going.

And in any case, what's to say that the Tokyo house or somewhere else isn't working on exactly this?

And sure, an army of super-actives would be great, but it seems like it would be arguably easier or at least as-easy to just have their Tophers develop exactly what he developed and just use the ready-and-waiting populace that is sitting there just itching to be exploited.

And from the position of writing, that would just make it all the more complicated. How tough is it to explain how the Active technology works without also trying to explain how they simultaneously got advanced human cloning put together to perfectly compliment things. It would also ruin most of the philosophical intent of the show (or at least vastly shift it).

Finally: put me down for a Whiskey and a Sierra.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
@Alcon: you're saying that because one unrealistic technology exists, another one must as well? Whedon asks us to suspend disbelief about the plausibility of active-technology because it is necessary to tell his story. Super advanced clone technology is not necessary to tell his story, so he doesn't bother to pretend it exists.

Not to mention that Rossum is a company specializing in neuroscience. They're already in the process of developing the techniques that lead to active-technology. Whereas super-precise and accelerated clone technology would require them to start mostly from scratch, invest billions of dollars.... for what?

They can already get the actives they need for reasonable prices. They don't need to invest in an "army" because their research is already leading up to the ability to create an army of super geniuses instantly (that's the whole point of the last few episodes, let alone Epitaph 1). All it takes is an automated phone call to everyone in the country and you have an instant army. Clones would be completely superfluous.
 
Posted by Sala (Member # 8980) on :
 
I loved, loved, loved the first hour, and the last twenty minutes of the second hour. The first forty of the second hour, though, hated, hated, hated.
---

---

---

---

---


SPOILER


I really hated when they did . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . dream sequences on Star Trek, and the first part of the second hour was too much of that, imo. But, oh my gosh, what an incredible story line! I haven't seen Epitaph One yet. I wonder if it would have been as astounding to me if I had seen it first, based on comments here.
 
Posted by Sala (Member # 8980) on :
 
Okay, apparently I don't know how to put spaces in to separate spoilers. It still shows up in the little blurb. Sorry.
 
Posted by Dogbreath (Member # 11879) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sala:
I wonder if it would have been as astounding to me if I had seen it first, based on comments here.

[SPOILER]


Epitaph 1 is set in Arcane's vision of the future. It helps give you a little background to what's going on, but there's nothing essential to the plot you're missing.

Also, the idea of the "Attic", people being used for their processing power as chips in a supercomputer, was the original idea behind the Matrix. Each person connected to the Matrix was, in fact, part of the Matrix. They dropped that in favor of the idiotic "people are fuel" idea, because they thought the average person would be too stupid to understand it. [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
If Victor was transfered to the LA Dollhouse (as Adelle told Boyd), why was Topher the one to put him under? Unless Adelle lied to Boyd about that, which I guess is possible.

Gah! I guess knowing that you have to get to an endpoint can really help a show. I liked it before. I love it now.
 
Posted by Dogbreath (Member # 11879) on :
 
I think it means he was recruited at another house, and then sent to LA for processing.
 
Posted by Glenn Arnold (Member # 3192) on :
 
Random musings:

While Dollhouse is wrapping up, I'm also watching Battlestar Galactica on DVD. I just watched the episode in which Helo accuses a doctor of mistreating Geminons, and there's a scene where Helo is telling Sharon that he is always on the wrong side, yet he winds up being right.

It seems to me that Tahmoh Penikett is being typecast as a Cassandra character. Given the nature of Dollhouse, I'm curious how much attention Whedon is paying to how much range each actor is expected to stretch. I think we all agree that Dushku's range is quite limited, but we haven't seen Topher display much range, nor Boyd, even Adelle (although her character is much more well developed, it's still always her).

In discussion tonight, it also occurred to me that Echo actually should always seem to be the same character, since she has the ability to hold onto herself between wipes. I don't think Whedon planned it that way, but...

I also want to see what Enver Gjokaj has lined up after Dollhouse ends. I have little doubt that he will have a long and successful career a-la Meryl Streep unless he goes Heath Ledger... Don't want to think about it, but I did anyway.

As for the whole cloning argument, it's a moot point. Whedon wanted to explore self-ness and consent, and this is the way he chose to do it. So in this world, cloning isn't an issue.

And also: When Alpha speaks to Echo in Ballard's voice; There is no question in my mind that Alan Tudyk was lip syncing.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
Enver is starring alongside Robert De Niro, Edward Norton and Milla Jovovich in Stone (he's a young De Niro).

It's not a bad start, I guess.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
Just saw the last five episodes back to back last night on Hulu.

Uh... Wow. I think Joss might be making super good on purpose because it's getting canceled, just to make the studio look stupid. [Wink]

And Victor as Topher was awesome beyond description!
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Man, too bad he didn't try just doing that a year ago.
 
Posted by Fyfe (Member # 937) on :
 
I feel like throughout the first series, the show was trying to save some awesome for later, and I think it was a mistake. Of course I've only got all invested after it gets canceled. [Razz]
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
This show is awesome, its like all of the story telling pros of certain grimdark anime's, character development, plot, overarcing themes, complex characters!

And of course While getting 2 seasons is not getting a third because Fox is staffed by retarded people who can talk.

So great but gone so soon!
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
Fox is staffed by retarded people who can talk.
*nod* They spend all their time on internet forums instead.
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
Firefly, Dollhouse, who knows how many good shows have been cancelled because of them.

[ December 30, 2009, 06:14 PM: Message edited by: Blayne Bradley ]
 
Posted by Jon Boy (Member # 4284) on :
 
Blayne, please tone down the language.
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
Don't recall that word being a swear word and it IS fox which is as kinda been Acceptable Targets for a long time now.

In other news I love how the show is like spot the Battlestar Refugee.
 
Posted by Jon Boy (Member # 4284) on :
 
I didn't say anything about swear words.
 
Posted by Eaquae Legit (Member # 3063) on :
 
Blayne, please refrain from using that sort of insult. I don't care about FOX, but I care very deeply about "retarded people who can talk." This is an insult to them, to specific people I have loved and who are just as human and deserving of respect as you, and I find it very upsetting. Insult Fox all you want (I'm not a big fan either), but please find a different way.

If you can't understand the reasoning, then please refrain out of a sense of courtesy, now that you know insults like that are hurtful to members of this forum.

***

In other news, why does this show have to go and be all compelling now that it's been cancelled? Geez, man.

Enver is a phenomenal actor. I look forward to seeing him in more things, and would probably take time to see films/tv I wouldn't otherwise bother with, if he was in them.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
In other news, why does this show have to go and be all compelling now that it's been cancelled?
Perhaps it's because it's canceled -- there's no time for fluff or filler episodes.
 
Posted by Eaquae Legit (Member # 3063) on :
 
Point.

Ah well, at least it should end strong. *crosses fingers*
 
Posted by kmbboots (Member # 8576) on :
 
oooo...twisty.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Curse you, stupid Wikipedia episode list!
 
Posted by Magson (Member # 2300) on :
 
*blinks*

Wow. Didn't see *that* one coming.

Edit to add: I googled the word "Rossum" as being part of a play as stated by Clyde 2.0 or 5.0 or whatever and came up with Rossum's Universal Robots. Eerie similarities to the whole story arc the show has taken.

Edit again -- linkie code won't work becuz it wants a parenthesis, so... It's at wikipedia.....

[ January 09, 2010, 01:44 AM: Message edited by: Magson ]
 
Posted by Sala (Member # 8980) on :
 
Whohoohoo! THAT was one interesting episode. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Goody Scrivener (Member # 6742) on :
 
Hoe. Lee. Crud. My jaw is in my lap right now.
 
Posted by Brinestone (Member # 5755) on :
 
Was "Clyde" Topher? He had a lot of the same mannerisms.
 
Posted by Alcon (Member # 6645) on :
 
------- SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS ---------
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Okay, I immediately began concocting different perspectives on the plot wherein Boyd is still on the side of good and not in fact evil. Perspectives such as he actually lost control of Rossum long ago, after realizing what his previous actions were going to lead to and is now fighting to undo the harm he has done. Or something along those lines. I simply refuse to believe that he's actually the evil head of Rossom. Or rather that he is still the evil head of Rossom.

---------END SPOILERS
 
Posted by Alcon (Member # 6645) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brinestone:
Was "Clyde" Topher? He had a lot of the same mannerisms.

I'm actually wondering that. I'm wondering if Clyde == Topher == Bennet. If Topher and Bennet are just modified imprints of the original Clyde who've had their memories changed to make them think they are different people. That would explain their brilliance, compatibility, apparently similar personalities. And it might go some of the way toward explaining Boyd...

If he came to regret what he did to Clyde 1.0 - but had since lost control of the company - maybe he recreated new people using Clyde as a base. But modified them to make them more whole people, with the hope that he would have allies in defeating the people who'd taken control from him. Maybe so he could get the original Clyde back or something.
 
Posted by kojabu (Member # 8042) on :
 
Topher and Bennett cannot be imprints because they were not affected by the remote wipe zapper.
 
Posted by kmbboots (Member # 8576) on :
 
I would just like to bask in the fact that I know (and have hugged) Harry Lennix. I don't know him well, but we have had a few conversations and he would recognize me by name with some context. My boss knows him really well. He is a very lovely man. We joked about how people were always mistaking him for Barack Obama. (This was before the election.)
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Magson:
*blinks*

Wow. Didn't see *that* one coming.

Edit to add: I googled the word "Rossum" as being part of a play as stated by Clyde 2.0 or 5.0 or whatever and came up with Rossum's Universal Robots. Eerie similarities to the whole story arc the show has taken.

As soon as Clyde said it was from a play, I did a facepalm for not thinking of RUR.

What Saunders did totally caught me off guard. But it was only a minute or two after that that I realized Clyde's partner had to have been Boyd.

When Caroline stepped off the elevator and I saw the nebbishy Clyde, I thought I was wrong. Until he said he was Clyde.

I can't believe there are only two eps left.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I knew Bennet was gonna get shot (well, I knew Saunders was acting creepy. I didn't expect her to go out quite like that but wasn't surprised when it happened. Just sad. Poor poor Cameron *cough* I mean Bennet).

I also figured out Clyde was Clyde within a few seconds.

I totally did not see the last 10 seconds coming.
 
Posted by Dogbreath (Member # 11879) on :
 
It shows how sensitive to formula we are as a people - as soon as I saw Saunders walk up with her hands behind her back and acting seemingly innocuously, I knew Bennet wasn't long for this world. Poor girl.
 
Posted by Goody Scrivener (Member # 6742) on :
 
I missed this on first watch through.... Caroline using River's line when raiding Adele's office. Now I wish Topher had said that Bennett had gone all Terminator on him rather than Cylon.

I knew Bennett was doomed as soon as I saw her and Topher's interactions over Caroline's original imprint. when Bennett snapped out of it enough to ask whose imprint they were trying to fix, that sealed her fate for sure.

[ January 11, 2010, 12:35 AM: Message edited by: Goody Scrivener ]
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I don't think that sealed her fate in the slightest. (Well, maybe in a foreshadowing sense, but I don't even think that necessarily led to anything bad. I was actually really interested in seeing the interaction between Caroline and Bennett and thought that would have been a perfectly good direction to take the story....

except we know Topher has to go crazy and be all alone except for Dewitt (duwitt?). So Bennett had to die to satisfy Epitaph 1.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
Who here is going to rewatch Epitaph One before watching Epitaph Two? ::raises hand::
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Aye.
 
Posted by Goody Scrivener (Member # 6742) on :
 
Naturally.
 
Posted by TheGrimace (Member # 9178) on :
 
gah! so happy, and yet so sad...

----SPOILERS---

The show is awesome, yet ending. We get Amy Acker back, but lose Summer Glau... damn you Joss! Why do I love your work so much?!

I'm liking the twist with Boyd, and am super-curious where it's going and what his true aim has been in all this. I like it because he has always had a little nagging "why are you here?" thing going for me. It hasn't been enough to bother me, just enough to make me think "there's more backstory here" a-la Shepherd Book... Why would a generally good former cop be working for the evil morally dark-grey corporation?

After watching this much of Boyd though, I would find it hard to believe that he's really evil (still?). I mean, it's certainly possible, but we've seen him take bullets for people before, and I find it hard to believe he'd do that just to flush the world down the toilet.

My initial bet is that one of the Clydes is actually the bad guy and Boyd has been working against him. So excited to see the rest...
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Hmmm, answers some questions (spoilers following last episode obviously):
quote:
The man who shot Mal Reynolds in the gut came back to kick us in the teeth, with Friday's episode of Dollhouse. Tim Minear's brilliant episode left us with tons of questions, and luckily he was willing to answer them.

How long ago did you guys decide that Boyd Langton was going to be the mastermind behind Rossum? Was this a recent decision, or something planned since the beginning?

It was decided upon early in the forming of the stories this season.

quote:
The trickiest of the flash forwards was the Saunders/Boyd-on-the-run scene — because we weren't thinking "Boyd is going to be Rossum" at that point. Mostly, we were thinking "nothing matters — we're cancelled." Whoops. So simply putting that scene in and trying to craft scenes around it seemed the best way to tackle that element.
http://io9.com/5444956/the-truth-about-dollhouses-evil-mastermind

Shades of Babylon 4 [Smile]
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
http://io9.com/5444956/the-truth-about-dollhouses-evil-mastermind

"And I shot Bennett in the head because it's funny."
 
Posted by Alcon (Member # 6645) on :
 
I can't decide if Tim Minear is the Darth Vader to Joss Whedon's Anakin or the Darth Vader to Joss Whedon's Palpatine.
 
Posted by Olivet (Member # 1104) on :
 
I just wrote an article for the GeekaChicas website, if anyone's interested. Dollhouse: Did I Fall Asleep?

I was not a Dollhouse early-adopter -- I watched it, but mostly with one foot out the door.

That show really tried to tackle some interesting and disturbing subject matter.

Now I'm sad to see it go. [Frown]
 
Posted by TheGrimace (Member # 9178) on :
 
excellent article. thanks for linking it.
 
Posted by Olivet (Member # 1104) on :
 
Thank you, Grimace! Someone linked to it on Whedonesque, and it has now become the article with the highest hit-count GeekaChicas has ever had, which really blows my mind.

I wish there was more Dollhouse to come. There's what, one more episode? [Cry]

It has insured that I'll watch anything Whedon writes, though. They could televise his shopping list and I'll be there.
 
Posted by TheGrimace (Member # 9178) on :
 
too true, too true... but to be fair, he'd have you guessing to the last second whether those cucumbers were the villains, or if it was really the captain crunch all along. And lord help you if you grow attached to the soup, because the second you do, it's going to get dropped and you'll only have its spilt remains left to cry over.

and now I think I've taken the "Joss writing his shopping list" analogy waaaaay too far.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by TheGrimace:
too true, too true... but to be fair, he'd have you guessing to the last second whether those cucumbers were the villains, or if it was really the captain crunch all along.

Breakfast of the Gods.
 
Posted by Olivet (Member # 1104) on :
 
Oh, and there'd be a musical episode!

"Whaaaaaat shall I do with these tomaaaaatoes?"

And then someone would make slaw out of everyone's favorite character, the quirky cabbage.

Now *I've* taken the analogy too far. *snicker*

[ January 15, 2010, 10:10 AM: Message edited by: Olivet ]
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
quote:
It may have started shaky, but it has come around to the point that the next time Whedon has a new show - no matter how off-putting the premise - I'll be right there to lap it up. Again.
Good point. Damn you Whedon!
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
quote:
Breakfast of the Gods.
FINALLY someone else who reads that!
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
A question I had from last time was, "Did Caroline deliberately befriend Bennet BECAUSE she worked for Rossum, or did she find that out later?"

My question for tonight was "Did Boyd deliberately allow Echo to blow up a building so that he'd have something legitimate to threaten her with?" It was implied that he had this whole master plan, but it didn't seem all that well thought out.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
"Ah, my ridiculously circuitous plan is one-quarter complete!"
 
Posted by Sala (Member # 8980) on :
 
Ahhh, another great episode. I'm beginning to think that more tv should be structured like this one: instead of delivering a ten-volume book series that gets lost along the way (multi-year series), it should be more like a short story . . . a limited run (two years) with no wasted time on extraneous stuff. Just go for the gusto all the way, like Dollhouse has been doing for the past six or so episodes. Makes for great television.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
I found myself not enjoying this episode as much, but I can't tell how much of that has to do with the episode and how much is that I watched it on real TV instead of on hulu. A few times in recent years I've ended up watching season finale's on real TV and somehow it always seems... worse. On top of the commercials yanking me away for 5 minutes at a time, camerawork and lighting seem worse and even the acting feels not as good.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sala:
Ahhh, another great episode. I'm beginning to think that more tv should be structured like this one: instead of delivering a ten-volume book series that gets lost along the way (multi-year series), it should be more like a short story . . . a limited run (two years) with no wasted time on extraneous stuff. Just go for the gusto all the way, like Dollhouse has been doing for the past six or so episodes. Makes for great television.

I think the best approach is something like Dexter, wherein each season is a largely self contained very long movie. Granted, this is my favorite approach for STORYTELLING, which isn't the same thing as being financially viable. (Dexter seems to be doing well for itself but I think that's a combination of factors beyond the story arc techniques.)

In Dollhouse's case, Whedon's mentioned that he didn't get to do as many "romance engagement" episodes as he would have liked, which would have been largely standalone and dealt specifically with the kinds of things people would want from the Dollhouse. The problem is those episodes would have been a hard sell. period unless the opening season had somehow had a more interesting main character for us to root for prior to Echo's full manifestation.
 
Posted by Chris Bridges (Member # 1138) on :
 
Posted my thoughts on it here. Short version: "Meh."

I can excuse all the rushed details and low budget shortcuts, but the utter lack of any sort of Caroline/Echo resolution really bothered me. Echo (possibly) sacrificed herself to bring back Caroline. What happened? Who's in charge? Are they both in there now? What the hell?

Since Echo's sense of identity was the focal point of the whole freaking series, I kinda expected a little more, there.
 
Posted by Jon Boy (Member # 4284) on :
 
Good article, Chris. I felt disappointed, too, and I think you touched on all the reasons why. It's not that it was bad, but it certainly was a letdown from the expectations that had been built up.
 
Posted by Alcon (Member # 6645) on :
 
I don't buy it. I feel like they went for Boyd as the leader of Rossum because he was the last person we'd expect. Pure shock value. They didn't make it the least bit convincing though. Everything Boyd has been up until now does not even remotely match what he became this episode. It didn't fly. He was like a child in this episode. In every other he's been the most mature, intelligent, perceptive... it just didn't work.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
It also seems like a pretty crappy plan considering the sheer resources he has at his disposal.

But I give it a pass since the whole season was really rushed, surpassing the plot-crunch at the end of both Babylon 5's fourth season and Jeremiah in terms of crunchiness.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
I call BS. If they weren't cancelled and trying end on something interesting, Boyd would never have been Mr. Rossum. There's no way that that's what they were aiming for from the beginning.
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
What an awful show.
 
Posted by Alcon (Member # 6645) on :
 
I offer the new Joss Whedon version of the nuked fridge to jumped shark: The Rossum revealed Boyd.
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
Can a show really jump the shark in its penultimate episode? How much of a shark could there be at that point?
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
My feeling is that Boyd COULD have been a convincing head of Rossum if they had put more effort into it. I could have bought something like realizing how out of control it had gotten and genuinely trying to fix it, or having an even bigger, badder company out there they actually needed all this military-grade neurotech to fight against.

I actually spent all of Season 1 (and some of 2) wondering what secret backstory they could possibly have for Boyd that would live up to all the secrecy about his origin story. Everything I could think of wasn't extreme enough to justify hiding it so long. The interview made it clear that they didn't know who he was until the beginning of this season, which is somewhat disappointing, but it is pretty much the only resolution I can think of that lived up to the hype.
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
It really needed 5 seasons [Frown]
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Without knowing what the original plan was, I honestly think 3 would have been fine. (Maybe with full 20 episode seasons, giving us some time to see Echo go on normal engagements with full command of her abilities). Although if they were intending to introduce a rival to Rossum that started the Thought-pocalyptic war, another season to show that in all its detail could have been useful.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
[Frown]

That was terrible.

What the hell?

There where shiny moments, but they shined through a layer of crap. Very disappointing.

There was so much more that should have been done with Whiskey, Boyd, Mellie, Adelle, Victor and Sierra, basically everyone. I'm sure Epitaph Two will be good, but I am not happy.
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
Okay anyone else here thought Boyds plan kinda made sense?
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
No
 
Posted by Dobbie (Member # 3881) on :
 
No.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
The interview made it clear that they didn't know who he was until the beginning of this season, which is somewhat disappointing, but it is pretty much the only resolution I can think of that lived up to the hype.
What interview is this?
 
Posted by Dobbie (Member # 3881) on :
 
http://io9.com/5444956/the-truth-about-dollhouses-evil-mastermind
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
Well maybe not every detail but think about it, 1 person has a biology that could work towards a vaccine against imprinting, its in many ways no different from other plans where best & brightest + richest are saved from death in disaster movies.
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Blayne Bradley:
It really needed 5 seasons [Frown]

It also needed a better premise and better episodes and better acting and better everything.
 
Posted by Sala (Member # 8980) on :
 
Hmmm. Looks like I'm in the minority here for thinking it was a good episode. I loved the Priya/Anthony scenes. I also thought that there should have been much, much more in the Echo/Caroline assimilation. I was sure that Boyd had realized that what he had done with the dolls was all bad and that he had become Caroline's handler and that she was the savior because she was going to prevent the apocalypse so he was helping her to stop it all. I was very disappointed that that was the opposite. I guess I just like lots of action. But I'll agree, lots of you have made some excellent points on why it was a poor episode.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
quote:
It also needed a better premise and better episodes and better acting and better everything.
I think it's more that you were just not the target audience. (I mean, the entire show is a feminist allegory, which you've shown a certain disdain for in the past)

I think Eliza could have been a much better actress, but became much more tolerable when she became an actual character as opposed to an empty shell. The show could have accomplished more if it had given her more time to grow AS a character instead of grow into a character in the first place.
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Clive Candy:
quote:
Originally posted by Blayne Bradley:
It really needed 5 seasons [Frown]

It also needed a better premise and better episodes and better acting and better everything.
You do realize your in the minority right and that the majority of people here really enjoy the show?
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
Like the Somalian cares. He hates everyone and everything.
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
I enjoyed aspects of the show, but the thing was a mess from the start. It didn't appear that Whedon and Dushku thought long and hard about the premise -- I remember when they announced the show and Whedon pretty much said the idea occurred to him when out on a lunch with Dushku and the show was greenlit right after that. Then we heard about there being production trouble and episodes having to be rewritten. It seemed that Whedon and his writers just came to realize how rotten the premise was.

The way every character in this show was morally compromised, the way episodes would tend to hinge on Topher's techno babble (there's nothing involving Doll technology that he couldn't do), the "hooker of the week" eps, the "evil" of the faceless, omnipresent "Rossum" corporation being painfully cartoony, and so on...it just all added up to meh.


Tim Minear wrote this last episode. He's a good writer. But he couldn't do much with this messy material.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
Except the rest of us loved the morally compromised characters, loved the premise, the loved most of this season.

There were certain episodes that did hinge on pretty silly technobabble, no argument there, but those were individual pieces of individual episodes. "Evil faceless Rossum" didn't really bother me until it was pointed out to me, and I'm pretty sure would have been better addressed if the show had had more time to explore it.

The only flaw with the premise was that Eliza wasn't a good enough actress to pull it off. Which to be fair was a pretty big flaw, but it wasn't the premise's fault for not being interesting to you in particular.
 
Posted by Irami Osei-Frimpong (Member # 2229) on :
 
It's funny. They have three really watchable actors in Victor, DeWitt, and Amy Acker's character. Four, the old chief of security makes sense, also. And I don't mind Ballard so much. But I don't think they write for the actress who plays DeWitt very well. I feel like her great presence is wasted. The dialog feels campy in a way I don't like. Whedon could pull it off with aplomb with space cowboys in Firefly, but I'd expect something set in the modern day to be less cartoony. I like the show fine. But there is a ham-fisted artlessness to the dialog that I don't like.

The idea has grown on me, even the story arc has grown on me, but I think that either the actors are over acting or the writers are over writing because every time someone opens their mouth, melodrama comes out instead of drama. I wish they would have continued Terminator 2 instead. And what ever happened to 4400? Oops, wrong network.

[ January 18, 2010, 02:43 PM: Message edited by: Irami Osei-Frimpong ]
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Raymond Arnold:
Except the rest of us loved the morally compromised characters, loved the premise, the loved most of this season.

As far as Whedon's shows are concerned, "Dollhouse" has been the most troubled and the most divisive. That surely must mean something is wrong with it.
 
Posted by Clive Candy (Member # 11977) on :
 
Remember when Caroline sent Boyd to his death (what an evil thing to do) and, after the evacuation of the building, Caroline ran from an explosion and was very awkwardly revealed to have survived (the rest of the crew were waiting for her to make it in time and, all of a sudden, she's there?). The direction/editing there was just ghastly.

These things add up.
 
Posted by Dobbie (Member # 3881) on :
 
As far as Whedon's shows are concerned, "Dollhouse" was one of them. That surely must mean something is wrong with it.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
So did this ep take place after Epitaph One?
 
Posted by kojabu (Member # 8042) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lisa:
So did this ep take place after Epitaph One?

This past Friday's ep? No, though the very last scene takes place at the same time as Epitaph One - 10 years later. Epitaph Two is taking place one year after Epitaph One, according to plot summaries for the final episode.
 
Posted by Geraine (Member # 9913) on :
 
I loved the episode. Boyd made sense to me. Echo had something in her that made her immune to complete wipes, and he wanted it. The two years that she had been at Adelle's house was just an experiment.

During the experiment I truly believe that Boyd came to love Adelle, Topher, and the rest of them as his own family. It would make sense to save them if he loved them that way.

It did have its flaws however.

I didn't understand what Boyd meant by "This technology can't be undone."

Wouldn't he have power to undo it? Or is Boyd as we know him just one version of the real Boyd and the others do not feel the same as this one?

Something else that puzzled me is why they used Doll Boyd to blow Rossum up. His memory was wiped, he had no idea who he was, he was essentially a child. I know they needed some way to blow the place up, but come on. Watching Boyd look at Echo and say "I try and be my best" right before going in and blowing himself up really made me question Echo's morality.

When Echo was running out of the building and then teleported outside next to everyone else I almost laughed. I also though it was bad writing when the rest of the gang ran out and Topher said "I got Saunders!" almost in passing. If they had that much time to get Saunders out, grab a bunch of dynamite, and evacuate the building, you would think they had time to rig the place without killing Doll Boyd.

The next episode looks like it will be pretty awesome, if not predictable. As soon as Topher said "I can fix everything" in the preview I knew what was going to happen.

The biggest reason I'm looking forward to the episode? More Felicia Day! =D
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
Boyd said it couldn't be undone because once something has been invented by one person, it'll be invented by another person. Finding out that the tech was possible meant it needed to be defended against.

Boyd betrayed Echo worse than anyone. Her entire conscious life, the one constant she had was that she could trust Boyd. Then he turned out to be a traitor who sold her into slavery and tortured her. Imagine how she felt when he said that he wanted to keep her alive, but he could manage without. If you think it's immoral to take revenge on someone in that situation, fine, then she's immoral. I would be, too.

And the "I got Saunders" was even dumber, since Claire no longer exists. Just her body does.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
I dunno though, in the morality framework that the show is pushing, it seems to distinguish between Caroline the person and Echo the person, with it being possible for one to be moral and the other not. For example, the show did seem to lead toward the conclusion that it was bad for Bennett to torture Echo instead of Caroline (at least more bad).

In that context, it does seem at least controversial to blow up Doll-Boyd for something that Boyd-Actual did.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
Doll-Boyd didn't have his own soul. But this was a guaranteed way to dispose of Boyd forever. Maybe Echo or Caroline or someone in there reads comics or watches TV shows and knows that if you don't make absolutely sure the villain is disintegrated, they'll be back.
 
Posted by kmbboots (Member # 8576) on :
 
Unless Boyd has a spare Boyd someplace.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Soul? Does not compute.

Anyways, given that both Clyde and Ambrose have backups, it is almost certain that Boyd will have backups as well, so it is far from guaranteed.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
Along the same lines, Mucus, I see no reason why Rossum wouldn't also have kept all of its tech eggs in one basket, and almost certainly has another HQ somewhere.

But, knowing about the Epitaphs, I guess this is sort of implied.
 
Posted by kojabu (Member # 8042) on :
 
quote:
But, knowing about the Epitaphs, I guess this is sort of implied.
Yeah, otherwise how else could the world have gotten to that state? They destroyed one of Rossum's buildings, but they must have had others around the world doing the same thing in case something like that happened.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
Soul? Does not compute.

Anyways, given that both Clyde and Ambrose have backups, it is almost certain that Boyd will have backups as well, so it is far from guaranteed.

You know what I mean by soul in this case. Echo is a person. Doll-Boyd was not.

And would it have occurred to Echo that Boyd would have a backup?
 
Posted by Jon Boy (Member # 4284) on :
 
It should have occurred to her.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
You know what I mean by soul in this case.
I don't.
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Clive Candy:
I enjoyed aspects of the show, but the thing was a mess from the start. It didn't appear that Whedon and Dushku thought long and hard about the premise -- I remember when they announced the show and Whedon pretty much said the idea occurred to him when out on a lunch with Dushku and the show was greenlit right after that. Then we heard about there being production trouble and episodes having to be rewritten. It seemed that Whedon and his writers just came to realize how rotten the premise was.

The way every character in this show was morally compromised, the way episodes would tend to hinge on Topher's techno babble (there's nothing involving Doll technology that he couldn't do), the "hooker of the week" eps, the "evil" of the faceless, omnipresent "Rossum" corporation being painfully cartoony, and so on...it just all added up to meh.


Tim Minear wrote this last episode. He's a good writer. But he couldn't do much with this messy material.

This is more or less crap, why didn't they think long on the premise? What is your reasoning to think so? Whats wrong with it being thought of during lunch? Many epithanies occur when on the john.

Production trouble and episodes being rewriting somehow make it a bad show? Whats wrong with you? They just can't win, to me rewriting episodes shows dedication and the willingness not to settle for crappy episodes followed by you jumping to your most obvious predetermined conclusion.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mr_porteiro_head:
quote:
You know what I mean by soul in this case.
I don't.
I explained it in the two short sentences following the one you quoted. You know, the ones you snipped?
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lisa:
You know what I mean by soul in this case.

Not really.

I mean, to elaborate, I don't have some sort of fundamental objection to souls in fiction. For example Babylon 5 certainly has something like a soul. But I don't see how a soul fits in the Dollhouse universe.

quote:
And would it have occurred to Echo that Boyd would have a backup?
Well, Clyde/Claire seemed to hammer in that message. Almost literally.
 
Posted by Geraine (Member # 9913) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Blayne Bradley:
This is more or less crap, why didn't they think long on the premise? What is your reasoning to think so? Whats wrong with it being thought of during lunch? Many epithanies occur when on the john.

Production trouble and episodes being rewriting somehow make it a bad show? Whats wrong with you? They just can't win, to me rewriting episodes shows dedication and the willingness not to settle for crappy episodes followed by you jumping to your most obvious predetermined conclusion. [/QB]

I agree with you Blayne. Rewriting the episodes was almost required of Wheedon and his group because the show was canned. It is providing closure to the storyline, unlike what happened to Terminator: TSCC.

I think the premise was interesting. I am happy with the direction the writers took the show.

It is "Epiphanies" though, not "epithanies." [Smile]
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
For example Babylon 5 certainly has something like a soul. But I don't see how a soul fits in the Dollhouse universe.
Actually, I don't think it did. Or at least, not explicitly. For a long time it seemed to, but in the end there was nothing in the show, not even the soulcatchers [eta: Soulhunters? I forget.], which depends on the existence of souls.

[ January 18, 2010, 08:06 PM: Message edited by: mr_porteiro_head ]
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lisa:
quote:
Originally posted by mr_porteiro_head:
quote:
You know what I mean by soul in this case.
I don't.
I explained it in the two short sentences following the one you quoted. You know, the ones you snipped?
Huh. If you say so. I certainly didn't read it that way.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
mph:
Well, I said "something like a soul." The Soul Hunters are the perfect example, they capture something distinct from the body that retains all knowledge and memory of a being, and can even be transferred from body to body IIRC River of Souls. It might not be the Christian conception of a soul which may or may not be your objection.

(IIRC, that was the way JMS kinda intended it. Something like "there is something special going on with death in the B5 universe" paraphrased loosely)
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
No. That's not my objection. My objection is that there's not really any evidence the memory copying and pasting that the Soul Hunters do isn't done with technology.

(BTW, I'm purposely ignoring everything to do with technomages, for they are lame and quick to break continuity.)
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
*shrug* I think the ambiguity was intended. Besides, even in real life we have no evidence that any "soul-like" behaviour (if it even exists) is not technological in nature.

But it was intended that there be the good possibility that events are explained by a soul. e.g. on Soul Hunter
quote:
As far as I'm concerned, the Trek-soul-katra thing treated the soul as
little more than a misplaced pair of sunglasses. Here we tried to get into
the issues *behind* the soul...where does it come from, where does it go, does
it survive the death of the body, or does it go on...to give some mystery and
beauty to the notion

http://www.jmsnews.com/msg.aspx?id=1-9460&query=soul
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
I think the ambiguity was intended.
Oh, definitely. Time and again, JMS went to great pains to make sure that such religious questions were neither definitively confirmed nor refuted.

Which is why you can't really say that souls (or soul-like things) are real in the B5 'verse. [Smile]
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
However, you really can say "something like a soul" is real in the B5 universe, which was all I said in the beginning.

But this is all a tangent, because I only brought up B5 as an upper bound. To whatever degree a "soul-like" entity is required to explain events and morality in the B5 universe, only a lesser degree is required for the Dollhouse universe. Of course 0 <= 0 anyways if you swing that way.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
However, you really can say "something like a soul" is real in the B5 universe, which was all I said in the beginning.
Only the same way that you can say that a photograph captures "something like a soul" from the person photographed. [Razz]

quote:
But this is all a tangent
You say that as though it's a bad thing!
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mr_porteiro_head:
Only the same way that you can say that a photograph captures "something like a soul" from the person photographed.

Perhaps, but to a much smaller degree.

Actually, I think we can examine it from a different point of view.

Angel (of Buffy-verse) has a soul. It glows, it can be extracted, captured in a jar, destroyed, and contain a person's "self."

Souls in B5 glow, can be extracted, captured in containers, destroyed, and contain a person's "self" which can even take over people.

Unless you object to Angel having a soul in the first place, the B5 souls sure seem to be pretty dang similar in function and properties, hence soul-like.
 
Posted by The White Whale (Member # 6594) on :
 
I tip my hat to you, Mucus, for combining Babylon 5 and Buffy/Angel together into one coherent thought. And bonus points for making a good point while you're at it! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
The big difference between B5 and Buffy souls is that B5 souls never exist in any observable fashion except with the Soul Hunter tech. No tech, no "soul". At least, as far as we can tell.
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
The thing that really threw me in this episode was the fact that I never once saw buildings like Rossum's in Tucson.

Ever.

Well, that, and the magic teleporting Echo. [Smile]
 
Posted by sarcasticmuppet (Member # 5035) on :
 
In the Dollhouse universe, people (even Dolls) have souls. Ballard says as much while they were trying to track down Alpha at the end of season 1-- you can't delete someone's soul. Alpha, Echo, Victor and Sierra all had transcendent qualities that couldn't be deleted or written over through Doll tech.

Which makes the idea of one phone call creating an army of zombie berzerkers in Epitaph 1 pretty interesting. Maybe, even without intervention, people can eventually manage to shake off the imprint, because their soul is stronger.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Really? You watched Dollhouse/BSG and you came away with the idea that you should listen to Ballard/Helo? [Razz]

Anyways, we know that in the case of Echo, the mechanism for her resisting imprinting is just her spinal fluid which is both resistant and needs to be trained, however odd it sounds. So we have two explanations, either different people have different strengths of soul which happens to correlate with the spinal fluid in Echo's case or just different people have spinal fluids of differing resistance. I think the latter explanation is simpler.

mph: This is largely true*, I'm not sure that it matters though. There are only a handful of people in Buffy/Angel that are shown on-screen to have soul manipulation powers, Willow, Gypsies, and Jasmine.

* Although I found the depiction of telepaths seeing the soul depart the body as a person died kinda interesting too
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
mph: This is largely true*, I'm not sure that it matters though. There are only a handful of people in Buffy/Angel that are shown on-screen to have soul manipulation powers, Willow, Gypsies, and Jasmine.
We see multiple and persistent effects of these souls. Three different vampires were shown to have souls at different times (Angel, Spike, and Darla (while pregnant)). Each one received their soul in a different way. Many different beings with varied powers are able to detect the souls in Angel and Spike, and all three of them react to their souls in similar ways.

While you can remove the Soul Hunters from B5 (which are only in, what 3 episodes, including the movie?) and completely eliminate the evidence for souls*, you can't do that in the Buffyverse. In Buffy, the evidence of souls is persistent and varied.

*I'm discounting the telepath evidence you mention, because, IIRC, it doesn't give any evidence of any soul-like thing that exists or that can exist separate from the body. Am I misremembering?

Of course, using meta logic, Buffy and Angel never give the viewer any reason to doubt the reality of the souls. B5, on the other hand, does.
 
Posted by Shanna (Member # 7900) on :
 
So what did everyone think of the finale?

Aside from a few good moments, I was seriously underwhelmed and even annoyed by some scenes.

I was bored enough to play some solitaire while I watched. I really enjoyed Epitaph One and I'm not sure why this episode fell so flat.
 
Posted by Brinestone (Member # 5755) on :
 
Hm. For me, the last few episodes have felt like the writers were going through the motions of giving what they felt like the audience wanted for an ending. You can tell when a writer is excited about what they've written, and they just weren't. It felt false and flat because they didn't care about the direction it was taking. I feel like Joss wanted to explore more of the social and ethical questions of the dollhouse instead of moving into good-guys-save-the-world territory. I kind of wish he had, though I'm not sure we would have liked it any better. At least it would have felt truer.
 
Posted by Sala (Member # 8980) on :
 
I'm glad that I saw Epitaph One before seeing this episode. That helped quite a bit in making me feel connected with it. I can easily imagine how I would have felt without having seen it first.

Aside from that, it always amazes me when "fallen societies" still have manufactured clothing, refined fuel for transportation, etc., twenty years into the collapse. And where in the world did that tech come from that Anthony/Victor and his team used? Who invented that?

I have to say, I really did like when Topher turned and saw the wall of remembrances pictures.
 
Posted by Jon Boy (Member # 4284) on :
 
It was only ten years into the collapse, but still. And I agree that it felt like they were going through the motions. For whatever reason, there just wasn't a lot of tension throughout the episode. And killing Ballard (for a second time) was pretty cheap, but it did prompt the best acting from Dushku in the entire series.
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
Poor Helo [Frown] But then again now he gets to partake in the standard male fantasy.
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
Man it sucks that they're ending it so soon, the whole missing subplot with Alpha could have been cool.
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
It did kinda feel like going through the motions, but not in a bad way to me and I wouldn't have thought to call it that if it hadn't been mentioned. It gave me everything I wanted, but in a way that felt like a legitimate resolution of most character arcs, not simple fanservice. (Well, "legitimate" resolution is a bit off, since they got to skip ahead and cherry pick scenes, but they can't be blamed for that given the circumstances).

I actually liked the Ballard resolution quite a bit - both events surprised me.
 
Posted by Lisa (Member # 8384) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Shanna:
So what did everyone think of the finale?

Aside from a few good moments, I was seriously underwhelmed and even annoyed by some scenes.

I was bored enough to play some solitaire while I watched. I really enjoyed Epitaph One and I'm not sure why this episode fell so flat.

I thought it made up for the penultimate ep. Then again, I also watched the Epitaphs back to back, which I think made a difference.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Watched it, I liked the details of the catch-up and some of the touches like Topher and Bennett.

However, I just couldn't really buy that with how crappy Rossum was that their Neuropolis lasted for 10 years with the 'heroes' raiding them. Their security is worse than Wolfram and Hart. (Also, Topher can unwipe the world but can't get a remote control going? I get the emotional need, but plot-wise very arbitrary. And what if it failed?)

I found the missing Alpha storyline interesting though.

quote:
Originally posted by mr_porteiro_head:
*I'm discounting the telepath evidence you mention, because, IIRC, it doesn't give any evidence of any soul-like thing that exists or that can exist separate from the body. Am I misremembering?

Its debatable, by design really. Bester and Lyta both see the 'soul' depart the body while in the mind during death. They claim that it takes part of their own soul too.

The Day of The Dead is something else that comes to mind too actually, come to think of it.
 
Posted by Alcon (Member # 6645) on :
 
I have to admit, I enjoyed reformed Alpha a whole lot. I would have liked to see more of him.
 
Posted by Brinestone (Member # 5755) on :
 
Me too.
 
Posted by mr_porteiro_head (Member # 4644) on :
 
quote:
Its debatable, by design really.
Yeah, that's pretty much my point. If it's debatable, you can't say that it definitely exists. [Razz]

quote:
Bester and Lyta both see the 'soul' depart the body while in the mind during death. They claim that it takes part of their own soul too.
I don't remember that well enough to comment on it either way.

quote:
The Day of The Dead is something else that comes to mind too actually, come to think of it.
Good point. I forgot about that that. Do any of the dead people reveal things to the characters that couldn't have come from their own subconsciousnesses?
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
I don't remember too well. Refreshing with the Lurker's Guide page, http://www.midwinter.com/lurk/countries/us/guide/096.html , it looks like there are two prophetic instances, Morden predicting something about Lennier and Kosh giving a message to Sheridan via Lochley.
 


Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2