This is topic Net Neutrality in forum Books, Films, Food and Culture at Hatrack River Forum.

To visit this topic, use this URL:;f=2;t=057825

Posted by Flying Fish (Member # 12032) on :
I'm interested in Hatrackers' opinions of this decision.
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
It was a shame we thought we could protect net neutrality for as long as we did?
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
Charging a flat rate for bandwidth = good.
Charging different rates for separately negotiated services or content types = bad.

The rules, as written, are not clear enough to prevent the abuses I suspect that wireless companies in particular are going to try to sneak through.

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2