This is topic Net Neutrality in forum Books, Films, Food and Culture at Hatrack River Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.hatrack.com/ubb/main/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=057825

Posted by Flying Fish (Member # 12032) on :
 
I'm interested in Hatrackers' opinions of this decision.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703581204576033513990668654.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
It was a shame we thought we could protect net neutrality for as long as we did?
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
Charging a flat rate for bandwidth = good.
Charging different rates for separately negotiated services or content types = bad.

The rules, as written, are not clear enough to prevent the abuses I suspect that wireless companies in particular are going to try to sneak through.
 


Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2