This is topic World Unrest Thread in forum Books, Films, Food and Culture at Hatrack River Forum.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.hatrack.com/ubb/main/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=057986

Posted by Phanto (Member # 5897) on :
 
Protests are present in many countries including Iran, Libya, Bahrain, possibly China, and even, to a minor degree, the United States (Wisconsin, 40,000 protesters).

Any thoughts/comments?

[ February 20, 2011, 07:34 PM: Message edited by: Phanto ]
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
Oh, they shut off Wisconsin's internet already?
 
Posted by Paul Goldner (Member # 1910) on :
 
Just threatening the freedom of association.
 
Posted by Bella Bee (Member # 7027) on :
 
Erm... I sort of doubt that Wisconsin's army will kill and injure hundreds of unarmed protesters the way they're doing in Libya?

That's about where the similarities end.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
@Henry_Kissinger
Dr Henry Kissinger
Given Facebook's role in undermining US allies, should we charge Mark Zuckerberg with treason? Something to think about.

[Wink]
 
Posted by Phanto (Member # 5897) on :
 
Fair 'nuf. There seems to be a general spirit of unrest; edited to say "to a minor degree" [Razz] [Smile]
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Samprimary:
Oh, they shut off Wisconsin's internet already?

Gosh, I hope not... That would impact the development of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 in a most unacceptable manner!!!
 
Posted by capaxinfiniti (Member # 12181) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Paul Goldner:
Just threatening the freedom of association.

collective bargaining != freedom of association.
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
What distinction would you make between them, capax? Would you not accept that you have the right to ask that some other individual represent both you and your friend in conversation and negotiation?
 
Posted by Bokonon (Member # 480) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by capaxinfiniti:
quote:
Originally posted by Paul Goldner:
Just threatening the freedom of association.

collective bargaining != freedom of association.
I think, if we're being consistent, that it's just as crucial an aspect of freedom of association as money is to the freedom of speech, see Citizen's United, and prior rulings.

Neither is explicitly spelled out, and developed subsequent to the Bill of Rights, of course.
 
Posted by pooka (Member # 5003) on :
 
I was thinking it wasn't going to go well for other middle eastern countries who don't have as much to worry about their image with the West as Egypt did.
 
Posted by AchillesHeel (Member # 11736) on :
 
I am more surprised that 40,000 people in Wisconson assembled at all, thats almost all of them!
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
Bad Economic times are a breeding ground for civil unrest, so it shouldn't be surprising that we are seeing uprisings from Wisconsin to Libya. Economics are the key factor that links all these uprisings.
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
quote:
I am more surprised that 40,000 people in Wisconson assembled at all, thats almost all of them!
Actually, 80,000 people assembled. [Smile] Of course, some had to come from out of state.
 
Posted by AchillesHeel (Member # 11736) on :
 
Were any of them cattle diguised as people?

Last census in Arizona there were some cacti listed as citizens to pad the population count, being mammalian one might expect the cows to bear closer resemblance.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by AchillesHeel:
I am more surprised that 40,000 people in Wisconson assembled at all, thats almost all of them!

Football season's over. It's not like they have anything else to do anymore. [Razz]
 
Posted by kmbboots (Member # 8576) on :
 
Wisconsin doesn't have cattle so much as its has cows.
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
So anyway. Hi. Gaddafi bombed protesters with warplanes. Lost control of some cities due to defections. May have fled capital. His son provided a rambling and bizarre statement on tv blaming this probable civil war on 'drug addicts' or something.

If Gaddafi hasn't already fled, he stands a severe likelihood of ending in a body bag before this is all over.
 
Posted by Paul Goldner (Member # 1910) on :
 
"collective bargaining != freedom of association. "

No, collective bargaining is not equal to freedom of association. However, if we have freedom to associate, it logically follows that we have a right to collectively bargain.

So, school has 70 teachers, each under a one year contract. Teachers get together during the course of the year and decide to pool resources to hire a legally trained negotiator to meet with the school administration and gives the negotiator a list of what they expect in their contract for the following year with instructions that the contract should be the same for all 70 teachers.

Trying to figure out how that is not collective bargaining, and not an exercise of the right to freedom of association.
 
Posted by The Rabbit (Member # 671) on :
 
quote:
collective bargaining != freedom of association.
No, but prohibiting collective bargaining is a restriction on freedom of association. I think its reasonable to say that collective bargaining is a necessary element of freedom of association.
 
Posted by kmbboots (Member # 8576) on :
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/21/paul-krugman-the-wisconsi_n_826026.html
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Anyone reading the news out of Liibya?

Reports are that not only have protesters been bombed and mowed down with gunfire, but soldiers refusing to fire on protesters have been shot as well. Unconfirmed reports also have two Libya pilots defecting to Malta with their planes. Reports from opposition forces say that Ghaddafi has lost control of several cities around the country, especially in the East, and people are fleeing Tripoli.

I can't believe how fast that fell apart.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Yeah, its been pretty fascinating.
Looks like the British are pretty worried about the optics of their involvement in Libya, having provided weapons to Libya (ala US tear gas in Egypt), and with BP heavily involved in oil.

Bahrain seems to still be boiling slowly too.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
I wonder if everytime a country reaches critical mass even if a protest recently fizzled elsewhere somewhat (like in Iran) if that is just enough of a bump to push the other country back into combustion.

I still can't believe this is all happening in so short a time.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Yeah, you can really see governments scrambling to reorient their statements, trying to hedge their bets in the morning and then being forced to pick the side of the protesters in the afternoon.

It's pretty heartening in a way. After spending ten years blowing people up and spending who knows how much money trying to promote Western ideas of regime change, all these people are just up and doing it themselves in a few weeks with no help, or even against help provided by the West.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
What will be interesting is the verbal fencing Obama will have to do if Bahrain really teeters. The base for the Fifth Fleet there is probably our single most vital strategic resource in the region. If Bahrain falls, I've read several expert opinions that think it'll become a satellite protectorate of Iran, which leaves the US out in the cold, or trying to partner with someone like Qatar or the UAE.

Obama, I think, has done an okay job of doing the "right thing" when confronted with doing the traditional "safe" thing for US security. Egypt was hard enough, but Bahrain is nigh impossible.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Yemen is having some fun too
quote:
A defiant President Ali Abdullah Saleh said the street demonstrations and calls for his removal were “like a flu,” which had spread from Tunisia to Egypt and was contaminating the Arab world.

“Why do you turn to violence? Why do you turn to the destruction of things? This is an infection, it’s not in our culture, it’s not in our tradition,” he told journalists invited to the presidential compound for a rare news conference Monday morning.

Saleh refused to step down, warning that the country would descend into anarchy as the government collapsed. He has vowed to not run again in the 2013 elections, but since he has twice before made the same promise few believe him.

http://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/942417--demonstrations-like-a-flu-yemeni-president-says?bn=1
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Wow, thats a pretty good percentage.
quote:
More than a hundred thousand protesters poured into the central Pearl Square here on Tuesday in an unbroken stream stretching back for miles along a central highway in the biggest antigovernment demonstration yet seen in this tiny Persian Gulf kingdom. ... In a nation of only a half a million citizens, the sheer size of the gathering was astonishing. The protest, organized by the Shiite opposition parties, began in the central Bahrain Mall, two miles from the central square and seemed to fill the entire length of the highway between the two points.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/23/world/middleeast/23bahrain.html
 
Posted by Carrie (Member # 394) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Samprimary:
If Gaddafi hasn't already fled, he stands a severe likelihood of ending in a body bag before this is all over.

As the awkward-sounding translator informed me during Gaddafi's press conference this morning, he will die a martyr rather than hand the country over. His body bag may well happen.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
This is one crazy-ass long speech.

Also, this was interesting, prediction market chances of each dictator leaving by the end of the year.
quote:
Libya — Gadaffi: 83%
Bahrain — Al Khalifa: 62%
Yemen — Ali Abdullah Saleh: 48%
Iran — Ahmadinejad: 16%
Iran — Ayatollah Ali Khamenei: 15%

http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/22/middle-east-despot-watch/
 
Posted by Aros (Member # 4873) on :
 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/bahrain/8334771/Bahrain-royal-family-orders-army-to-turn-on-the-people.html

Wow! The royal family in Bahrain is actively promoting military violence against protesters. At least we could find our moral high ground against Tianamen Square. Bahrain has been one of our biggest allies.

quote:

But many refused to run, initially at least, determined to defy the violence being visited upon them. Some held their hands in the air and shouted "Peaceful! Peaceful!".

The shooting resumed. One man crumpled to the ground, blood pouring from his leg; nearby a second was also felled. A scream went up: "live ammunition!"

As security forces then began to fire anti-air craft guns over their heads and the air filled with tear gas, the protesters' will finally broke.

But even as they fled in headlong panic, a helicopter sprayed gunfire at them and more fell. Paramedics from ambulances that had rushed to the scene darted forward to help the wounded, but they too were shot at. Several were detained and at least one ambulance was impounded.


Obama certainly has some tough decisions to make. . . .
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
In fairness, that was on the 18th and before the NYT article about protests.
 
Posted by Phanto (Member # 5897) on :
 
The 'bet' odds are down to 75% for leader change last I checked in Libya based off the speech given by Gaddafi.

It seems like the unrest is becoming bloody and torn, with parts of the military defecting and a significant amount of cities in rebel control. Pray it does not become a civil war.

The extent, speed, and intensity of this world unrest is truly startling.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
A civil war would truly be an awful affair. One need only look at Sri Lanka to realize just how terrible those can be.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
From the Washington Post. I wonder just what responsibilities it could be argued America has regarding other countries attempting to democratically select their own government. Obviously committing ourselves diplomatically is a relatively speaking easy way to support protestors. Should/can we sell arms, give loans, or in otherwise provide materials to groups we support? Can we use force of arms to defend innocent civilians from governments that are attempting to kill them?

I find this question somewhat intriguing. We have certainly financed revolutions in the past, often covertly and openly, but when Pres. Bush said that we stand with anybody that wishes to rise up and institute democracy, what exactly should that mean?
 
Posted by kmbboots (Member # 8576) on :
 
It might mean that we should stop propping up the dictators in the first place. Problem is that dictators are good for business.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kmbboots:
It might mean that we should stop propping up the dictators in the first place. Problem is that dictators are good for business.

Well I would take that as a given. This is more for, "regardless of whether we have or have not supported a dictatorship in the past, what do we have a responsibilty to do so as to help other people from other countries establish their own democracies."
 
Posted by kmbboots (Member # 8576) on :
 
I don't think that you can take that as a given.

I think it is more complicated than that. Often the oppressive governments are our allies. Do we want to go to war with them? Can we? Because if we use force of arms to protect protesters from their own government (whatever that is - we have recognized it) that is going to war. Do the protesters really represent a majority? Do they want our help? (Most of them probably don't like us much.)

Two big questions are what is in the interest of the people in the country and what is in the best interests of the US. I think that the first question should be most important, but it isn't simple and has big consequences for the second.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Bush said that about Palestinian democracy, then refused to treat with Hamas when they won the election. The problem with supporting self-determination is that if the people who get voted into power aren't good for us, then we've just shot ourselves in the foot.

Do we support democracy unconditionally? I honestly don't know. I'd like to think so, in principle, but I'm not sure if that's practical.
 
Posted by Phanto (Member # 5897) on :
 
Article on the desert fighting

Reading this gave me a better sense of how organized/strong the protesters in Libya are.
 
Posted by SoaPiNuReYe (Member # 9144) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BlackBlade:
A civil war would truly be an awful affair. One need only look at Sri Lanka to realize just how terrible those can be.

It almost never comes down to Civil War, and even when it does, countries like Sri Lanka or Sudan are actually the exception rather than the norm.
 
Posted by Glenn Arnold (Member # 3192) on :
 
"We gotta make democracy safe for the world."

-Walt Kelly
 
Posted by Glenn Arnold (Member # 3192) on :
 
quote:
Oh, they shut off Wisconsin's internet already?
And you thought that was a joke.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Wow. I just saw the video of the Bahrain security forces opening fire on a group of protesters. I had flashbacks to that girl being shot in Iran last year. Seeing the street blood-spattered and littered with bodies in real time like that was disturbing.

It's almost good to know that I haven't been desensitized to something like that. I figured after all the movies I'd seen that show something just like it, I might not be able to have a genuine emotional reaction to the same thing only real.

That was tragic, and brutal.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
Iraq is getting in on the action. It's nice to see the difference in reaction. I really hope it remains peaceful and that nobody is attacked.
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
From Time:

quote:
There's been virtually no reliable information coming out of Tripoli, but a source close to the Gaddafi regime I did manage to get hold of told me the already terrible situation in Libya will get much worse. Among other things, Gaddafi has ordered security services to start sabotaging oil facilities. They will start by blowing up several oil pipelines, cutting off flow to Mediterranean ports. The sabotage, according to the insider, is meant to serve as a message to Libya's rebellious tribes: It's either me or chaos.
Two weeks ago this same man had told me the uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt would never touch Libya. Gaddafi, he said, had a tight lock on all of the major tribes, the same ones that have kept him in power for the past 41 years. The man of course turned out to be wrong, and everything he now has to say about Gaddafi's intentions needs to be taken in that context.


Read more: http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2052961,00.html#ixzz1ElW3Yj1d


 
Posted by Strider (Member # 1807) on :
 
Libya:

http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/meast/02/23/libya.plane.crash/

Apparently a military aircraft was ordered to bomb a city, the pilots refused, and parachuted out, letting the plane crash instead.

http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/africa/02/23/libya.interior.minister/index.html?hpt=T1

Seems the interior minister who resigned yesterday has been kidnapped. But information coming out Libya is so sketchy that it's difficult to glean whether this is true or not, and if so, who actually kidnapped him.
 
Posted by Rakeesh (Member # 2001) on :
 
As for the interior minister, I'm looking forward to learning more about him as stories develop-initially I was skeptical at his moral resignation because hey, interior minister for Gaddafi. I rather interpreted it as a face-saving gesture when the ship was sinking. I can't have been alone in thinking that.
 
Posted by Phanto (Member # 5897) on :
 
In other news, Greek protest turns violent
 
Posted by Dan_Frank (Member # 8488) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Glenn Arnold:
quote:
Oh, they shut off Wisconsin's internet already?
And you thought that was a joke.
Come on now. The linked article is certainly a very, very far cry from "shutting off the internet."

For those that didn't follow it, the linked article is about a single website being blocked from access within the Capital building, for about a half hour, after which time it was reported and access was granted. There is significant disagreement on both sides as to the cause of this (one side says it's standard policy to block sites till they've been approved, the other side says it's an attack of the first amendment) and nothing has been proven either way thus far.

You're certainly welcome to interpret the facts the way that makes sense to you, but comparing it to what happened in Egypt is pretty disingenuous.
 
Posted by SoaPiNuReYe (Member # 9144) on :
 
It's not even 2012 yet... We're a year early for this people!
 
Posted by Strider (Member # 1807) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dan_Frank:
quote:
Originally posted by Glenn Arnold:
quote:
Oh, they shut off Wisconsin's internet already?
And you thought that was a joke.
Come on now. The linked article is certainly a very, very far cry from "shutting off the internet."

For those that didn't follow it, the linked article is about a single website being blocked from access within the Capital building, for about a half hour, after which time it was reported and access was granted. There is significant disagreement on both sides as to the cause of this (one side says it's standard policy to block sites till they've been approved, the other side says it's an attack of the first amendment) and nothing has been proven either way thus far.

You're certainly welcome to interpret the facts the way that makes sense to you, but comparing it to what happened in Egypt is pretty disingenuous.

Dan, I don't see how Glenn's post is comparing anything to Egypt.
 
Posted by Dan_Frank (Member # 8488) on :
 
I... are you serious? I mean... you've read the same thread I did, right?

What part is confusing?
 
Posted by Raymond Arnold (Member # 11712) on :
 
The Egypt reference was pretty obvious, but I also thought the post was fairly obviously a meta-joke taking advantage of a humorous turn of events. It's funny that people were comparing Wisconsin to Egypt, and then its funny that this thing happened which is similarly Not-Actually-Really-Comparable-At-All-To-Egypt-But-Still-Makes-People-Think-It-Is™.

That's my take on it anyway. I'm actually not 100% sure I'm interpreting him right, and I lived with him for 21 years.
 
Posted by Strider (Member # 1807) on :
 
Someone made a joke about Wisconsin's internet being shut down, as a reference to the situation in Egypt. We agree that was a joke, correct? Glenn saw an article about this website being blocked within the capital building, and used that first post joking about the internet, as a vessel for making his post a reply. Nowhere in Glenn's post did he say, "oh my god, they blocked this site in the capital, that's totally equivalent to what happened in Egypt! Republicans are evil!" You drew that conclusion from his post. Maybe as a conservative you're more sensitive to this, but I saw it as a witty way to post a relevant link. Nothing more.
 
Posted by Dan_Frank (Member # 8488) on :
 
No, no I totally saw it that way too, Strider.

I think I'm sensitive because in another thread, I posted a smart-ass one-liner link post in a similar way and then was taken to task because the video didn't prove the content of my one-liner. But that's not Glenn's fault. So, sorry if you felt I was picking on you, Glenn. [Smile]
 
Posted by Glenn Arnold (Member # 3192) on :
 
Well, now that that's settled...
 
Posted by Phanto (Member # 5897) on :
 
It seems that in Libya, Qaddafi has lost control of almost everything beyond Tripoli. Rumor has it he was shot today, but that is unlikely, though it alone dropped oil prices like $2.

Either way, it seems possible, and maybe even likely, that the revolt/rebellion will launch an assault on the main city - and soon.

It seems to me his days in power are numbered.

People are very concerned about Saudi Arabia. If protests spread there, the damage to oil prices - and the global economy - could be catastrophic.
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
If Saudi Arabia falls, I will throw a small party and then buy a bicycle.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Personally, I hope that the governments of the world are working on seizing and freezing Gaddaffi's assets as soon as possible.

The guy could probably fund mercenaries indefinitely if not stopped quickly and it's mostly due to money we gave directly or via supporting the price of oil globally.

As if it wasn't disgusting enough that in this day and age, people are still using mercenaries.
 
Posted by Blayne Bradley (Member # 8565) on :
 
I'm fairly sure that would be illegal.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Phanto:
It seems that in Libya, Qaddafi has lost control of almost everything beyond Tripoli. Rumor has it he was shot today, but that is unlikely, though it alone dropped oil prices like $2.

Either way, it seems possible, and maybe even likely, that the revolt/rebellion will launch an assault on the main city - and soon.

It seems to me his days in power are numbered.

People are very concerned about Saudi Arabia. If protests spread there, the damage to oil prices - and the global economy - could be catastrophic.

I don't know about Saudi Arabia. It's one of the more stable dictatorships in the region. You'd reply to that by saying "yeah but that's what we said about Egypt and Libya!" but I think they're a slightly different situation. Saudi Arabia's unemployment rate is something like 10%, which is high by western standards, but it's still the lowest in the region. Egypt's was like 40%. I don't think there's quite as much boiling up under the surface there, but I could be wrong about that, obviously.

If they fall though, oil shoots through the roof. It's actually pretty silly too though. I mean I know that we get a lot of our oil from Saudi Arabia, but by percentage, domestic, Canadian, Venezuelan, misc. South American and African sources make up a far larger share individually as well as combined. It's an overreaction in the market, especially since dramatically huge numbers of new production come online all over the world every year, which is making the Middle East less and less important in terms of world oil production.

A lot of this is flat-out gouging.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Blayne Bradley:
I'm fairly sure that would be illegal.

I don't really see how.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Blayne Bradley:
I'm fairly sure that would be illegal.

The Swiss bank has already done so with Mubarak. Who is he going to complain to?
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
He's complaining about Nestle, apparently.

quote:
As Reuters reports, Libyans were puzzled by Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi's bizarre tirade on state television on Thursday in which he claimed that young Libyans "fueled by milk and Nescafe spiked with hallucinogenic drugs," were fighting not for their freedom but for Al Qaeda's leaders, Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahri.

 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
It's official... Gadhafi's a loon

quote:
Anti-government forces said they had gained control of the city as Gadhafi accused followers of Osama bin Laden of adding hallucinogenic drugs to residents' drinks to spark the unrest.

"They put it with milk or with other drinks, spiked drinks," he said. After taking the tablets, "they (the protesters) attack this police station or that one so they can steal from there the criminal records."

Gadhafi called for the al Qaeda leader to be prosecuted.

I always knew Nescafe was EVIL!
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
Gadhafi's always been a loon, a thug, and a remorseless killer. He's also been trying to establish a dynasty, which made it all the more concerning that his children seemed about as genuinely incohate and schizophrenic in their patterns of speech.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
New(old) country to add to the list: Iraq
quote:
Protesters killed in Iraqi 'day of rage'

At least nine people have been killed in anti-government protests in Iraq as thousands take to the streets in cities across the country for a "day of rage".

Baghdad has been virtually locked down, with the authorities banning traffic in the city centre and deploying several thousand soldiers on the streets.

Still, several hundred people gathered in Baghdad's own Tahrir Square, calling for reform, but not regime change.

An especially fun bit
quote:
On Thursday, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki urged people not to join the protests for security reasons, and accused the protest organisers of being al-Qaeda insurgents and Saddam Hussein loyalists.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12576613

I wonder if they also drink Nescafe [Wink]
 
Posted by SoaPiNuReYe (Member # 9144) on :
 
I wonder what the protests in Iraq will mean for US interests there.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
After Iraq's Day of Rage, a Crackdown on Intellectuals

Iraqi security forces detained about 300 people, including prominent journalists, artists and lawyers who took part in nationwide demonstrations Friday, in what some of them described as an operation to intimidate Baghdad intellectuals who hold sway over popular opinion.

On Saturday, four journalists who had been released described being rounded up well after they had left a protest of thousands at Baghdad's Tahrir Square. They said they were handcuffed, blindfolded, beaten and threatened with execution by soldiers from an army intelligence unit.

"It was like they were dealing with a bunch of al-Qaeda operatives, not a group of journalists," said Hussan al-Ssairi, a journalist and poet who described seeing hundreds of protesters in black hoods at the detention facility. "Yesterday was like a test, like a picture of the new democracy in Iraq."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/26/AR2011022603345.html?hpid=topnews
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
quote:
Iraqi security forces detained about 300 people, including prominent journalists, artists and lawyers who took part in nationwide demonstrations Friday, in what some of them described as an operation to intimidate Baghdad intellectuals who hold sway over popular opinion.
Mission accomplished!
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
Iran needs something to complain about... I know! How about the 2012 London Olympics logo?

quote:
Iran has threatened to boycott the London Olympics unless the organisers replace the official logo, which Tehran claims spells out the word "Zion".

The logo, a jagged representation of the year 2012, has been said by its critics to resemble many things, from a swastika to a sexual act, but the Iranian government argues it represents a veiled pro-Israeli conspiracy.

In a formal complaint to the International Olympic Committee, Tehran has called for the graphic to be replaced and its designers "confronted", warning that Iranian athletes might otherwise be ordered to stay away from the London Games.


 
Posted by Phanto (Member # 5897) on :
 
As an update, the situation in Libya is not resolved yet and it seems more and more like civil war. The rebels seem to be for the time being content to hold their position; Qaddafi is pretty much constrained to Tripoli, which he holds tightly.

US and foreign aid is now starting; maybe they'll sneak in some of the good stuff weapons wise.

The rebel coalition is promising to resume oil shipments to some degree and shows signs of forming a new government.
 
Posted by SoaPiNuReYe (Member # 9144) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Nighthawk:
Iran needs something to complain about... I know! How about the 2012 London Olympics logo?

quote:
Iran has threatened to boycott the London Olympics unless the organisers replace the official logo, which Tehran claims spells out the word "Zion".

The logo, a jagged representation of the year 2012, has been said by its critics to resemble many things, from a swastika to a sexual act, but the Iranian government argues it represents a veiled pro-Israeli conspiracy.

In a formal complaint to the International Olympic Committee, Tehran has called for the graphic to be replaced and its designers "confronted", warning that Iranian athletes might otherwise be ordered to stay away from the London Games.


Well the logo is terrible...
 
Posted by C3PO the Dragon Slayer (Member # 10416) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Nighthawk:
Iran needs something to complain about... I know! How about the 2012 London Olympics logo?

quote:
Iran has threatened to boycott the London Olympics unless the organisers replace the official logo, which Tehran claims spells out the word "Zion".

The logo, a jagged representation of the year 2012, has been said by its critics to resemble many things, from a swastika to a sexual act, but the Iranian government argues it represents a veiled pro-Israeli conspiracy.

In a formal complaint to the International Olympic Committee, Tehran has called for the graphic to be replaced and its designers "confronted", warning that Iranian athletes might otherwise be ordered to stay away from the London Games.


Sounds like the duped Nescafe missed its target.
 
Posted by Phanto (Member # 5897) on :
 
I never thought I'd say this, but I actually do get why you might think that.

Z upper left, I bottom left, O upper right, N bottom right.

Likely a complete coincidence, but not provocative nonsense totally unbased in reality; just provocative nonsense loosely based on reality.
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
Can we boycott the logo for simply being a hideously bad logo because well
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Samprimary:
Can we boycott the logo for simply being a hideously bad logo because well

That would indicate we have some kind of standard for that sort of thing.
 
Posted by kmbboots (Member # 8576) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Phanto:
I never thought I'd say this, but I actually do get why you might think that.

Z upper left, I bottom left, O upper right, N bottom right.

Likely a complete coincidence, but not provocative nonsense totally unbased in reality; just provocative nonsense loosely based on reality.

I saw this too. I think that the conspiracy theory gains credibility because the logo is so ugly. I mean...there has to be some reason for it to be that bad. [Wink]
 
Posted by Samprimary (Member # 8561) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kmbboots:
[QUOTE]I saw this too. I think that the conspiracy theory gains credibility because the logo is so ugly. I mean...there has to be some reason for it to be that bad. [Wink]

Absent some personality in the olympic committee who had the personal power to push his or her individual logo concept through with minimal impediment and review, the logo looks like typical failure of Design by Committee.
 
Posted by Nighthawk (Member # 4176) on :
 
I'm waiting for the IOC to use it as an excuse.

"Yup..." *snicker!* "You got us. We'll redesign it immediately!"
 
Posted by Jake (Member # 206) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Samprimary:
quote:
Originally posted by kmbboots:
[QUOTE]I saw this too. I think that the conspiracy theory gains credibility because the logo is so ugly. I mean...there has to be some reason for it to be that bad. [Wink]

Absent some personality in the olympic committee who had the personal power to push his or her individual logo concept through with minimal impediment and review, the logo looks like typical failure of Design by Committee.
Shirt 1: I like where we're going with this, but it's not X-treme enough!

Shirt 2: What if we made it radberry colored?

Committee: Oooooooooooooh!
 
Posted by advice for robots (Member # 2544) on :
 
Yeesh.

Being in London with that logo pasted all over the place would make me ill.

I'd never want to order bacon & eggs again.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
For the record:

Saudi forces crush protesters in Bahrain
quote:
UNTIL the Arab awakening reached Libya, protesters seemed able to prevail armed with little more than self-belief. Not any more. In Bahrain the regime’s troops, reinforced by foreigners—mostly Saudis—have stormed the protesters’ tent-city at Pearl roundabout, shooting as they went. In Yemen the regime of President Ali Abdullah Saleh has taken to firing live rounds into the crowds. And in Libya itself, as Muammar Qaddafi seizes back the rebel towns strung along the Mediterranean coast, the people are reaping the whirlwind. Torture and death are rampaging through Brega and Zawiya. Terror and despair loom over Tobruk and Benghazi.
http://www.economist.com/node/18395991?story_id=18395991&fsrc=rss

UN Security Council (and Arab League) authorizes no-fly zone in Libya
quote:
The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) has voted on a resolution authorising a no-fly zone over Libya and "all necessary measures" - code for military action - to protect civilians.

Ten of the council's 15 members voted in favour of the resolution, while Russia, China, Germany, India and Brazil abstained.

No votes were recorded against the resolution on Thursday, which was co-sponsored by France, Britain, Lebanon and the United States.

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/africa/2011/03/201131720311168561.html
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
I'm curious why Germany abstained.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
They've said that they don't want to be dragged into a civil war. Also, Rommel hasn't re-spawned yet
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
8.46pm ET: Canada, in a typical display of aggression, has already pledged six CF-18 fighter jets to help impose the no-fly zone in Libya.

 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
I fear this no-fly zone is too late.'

Also, Mucus, lol.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
Really depends on what the no-fly does. If they bomb anti-aircraft positions and stop Ghaddafi's air force from joining in, there really won't be that much of an effect. If they use air power to hit Ghaddafi's armor and artillery on the ground, well, then we might have a ball game.
 
Posted by TomDavidson (Member # 124) on :
 
quote:
If they use air power to hit Ghaddafi's armor and artillery on the ground, well, then we might have a ball game.
How would that be a "no-fly zone?"
 
Posted by Swampjedi (Member # 7374) on :
 
My understanding is that the resolution authorizes more than just a no-fly zone - see the "all necessary measures" language. There was some interesting discussion of that on NPR this morning. I am interested to see how each participating nation interprets that phrase.
 
Posted by Phanto (Member # 5897) on :
 
To me, this whole UN intervention is sadly reminiscent of Star Wars: The Phantom Menace. So slow and bureaucratic.

Meh. Who knows? To me, it seems like Gaddafi is close to crushing the insurgency altogether, but maybe it's just the cities in the West he's recaptured.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Yeah, I originally cited that "all necessary measures" clause as the reason the Germans want nothing to do with this, but looking last night at least, it seems they want nothing to do with even a strict "no-fly" zone.
 
Posted by BlackBlade (Member # 8376) on :
 
Link.

Oh...

Did not see that coming.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Updated 1337 GMT (2137 HKT)

 
Posted by Swampjedi (Member # 7374) on :
 
Gaddafi's Gambit?
 
Posted by Geraine (Member # 9913) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mucus:
quote:
Updated 1337 GMT (2137 HKT)

Coincidence? I think not!!!!
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Riots have spread to new areas of London while looting erupted in the city of Birmingham as Britain's worst violence in decades extended into the third night.

Looting by groups of hooded youths spread to Ealing in west London and Camden in the north of the British capital late on Monday.

Television pictures showed groups of men running through the streets and smashing shop windows. They also set fire to buildings in Croydon, a south London suburb, and Clapham, where they looted shops and cash machines and set fire to at least one shop.

The violence, which began in the northern Tottenham district on Saturday, also spread to Peckham and Lewisham. In Peckam, flames leapt into the air from a torched building, while rubble was strewn across the street. People walked in and out of shops looting.

Police with riot shields responded by charging them as they tried to seal off an area around Hackney Central station in the east of the city. Dozens of officers have now been deployed to the streets of Hackney.

But in a sign that the unrest had spilled outside of the capital, attackers smashed shops and looted property in the central England city of Birmingham.

London riots: Violence spreads in the capital and beyond

quote:
Massive demonstrations across Israel against the high cost of living point to a revival in the fortunes of the country's long-dormant left-wing movement, forcing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to focus on economic policy at a time when he enjoys broad support for his handling of policy toward the Palestinians.
...
On Saturday night, more than 250,000 protesters across Israel demonstrated while waving red flags symbolizing old-time socialist political movements, and chanting for "social justice" and a "welfare state." Over the past three weeks, a small tent city in central Tel Aviv protesting runaway rents has snowballed into Israel's largest demonstrations in recent memory, despite Mr. Netanyahu's efforts to demonstrate attentiveness amid the criticism. Real-estate values have gone up more than a third nationwide over the past four years.

Israel Protests Press Netanyahu


Syria still going of course
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
Map of riots in London, Liverpool, and Birmingham

http://maps.google.co.uk/maps/ms?msid=207192798388318292131.0004aa01af6748773e8f7&msa=0&ie=UTF8&ll=51.536086,-0.056305&spn=0.39294,0.630341&z=10&source=embed
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
Rioting spread to other cities in Britain for the first time, with unrest in Birmingham, Bristol, Liverpool and Nottingham. West Midlands police made 138 arrests. Chief Constable Chris Sims said of the looting in the city centre: "This was not an angry crowd, this was a greedy crowd."
Apparently, some Olympics test events are already under-way, raising concerns about safety.
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
There has been serious disorder in a number of towns and cities across England, including Manchester, Salford, Birmingham, and Gloucester. A police station in Nottingham was firebombed as violence also hit Liverpool, Leicester, Bristol, Wolverhampton and West Bromwich. Garry Shewan, assistant chief constable of Greater Manchester police, said: "This has been senseless on a scale I have never witnessed before in my career."
quote:
Martin Wainwright and Riazat Butt are in Birmingham, talking to people there about the killing of three men who were run over as they tried to protect property last night:

Feelings are running very high in Winson Green where residents of the largely British Asian area are out on the streets discussing the tragedy in shocked and angry groups.

...

One of the group of men said: "There will be race riots if the police don't sort this out quickly".

He accused largely African-Caribbean looting gangs of targeting Asian-owned businesses, partly because they were perceived as easier targets compared with the city centre which was full of police.

quote:
Several cars then drove past the group which was guarding local stores, Shakiel said, and the occupants shouted abuse before one vehicle returned and mounted the pavement at "tremendous speed" and hit the men, throwing them into the air.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/blog/2011/aug/10/manchester-riots-uk-disorder-day-four-live#block-1

By "Asian," they mean what we would normally refer to as South Asians here. Reminds me of the dynamic that arose with Koreans in the LA riots, or with Chinese businesses in many places in the world during unrest.

quote:
In Egypt, where burning buildings and running street battles between police and civilians have become a familiar sight this year, reaction to the violence in Britain has been sharply divided.

On social media sites Egyptians started intense debates over the underlying causes of events in London and asked whether any links could be drawn between the unrest in England and their own dramatic political upheaval.
...
Mosa'ab Elshamy, tweeted in frustration at those likening the British riots to the Arab Spring. "Egyptians and Tunisians took revenge for [police brutality victim] Khaled Said and [Tunisian street vendor Mohamed] Bouazizi by peacefully toppling their murdering regimes, not stealing DVD players."

But others hit back, arguing that police brutality and social depravation were universal and that looters should not be instantly condemned.

As happened during the uprising that toppled Hosni Mubarak in February, the role of state television came under scrutiny. One commentator, Mostafa Hussein, wrote: "[The] BBC is making it sound like young people have a single aim & that's to loot and vandalise. Nothing or very little on why they are doing so."

quote:
Hanna agreed, adding that the actions of looters in London compared unfavourably to the way Egyptians behaved when police were beaten off the streets. "On 28 January [when Mubarak's security forces had to withdraw from the streets] there were no police anywhere and yet there was still less looting than we've seen now in Britain. If the police were completely withdrawn on any given day in the UK the country would probably implode. That raises tough questions … the issue isn't just economical, it's societal."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/aug/09/uk-riots-egyptians-swap-views

[ August 10, 2011, 10:19 AM: Message edited by: Mucus ]
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
The young man who was the victim of an awful mugging in Barking last night has been named as Mohd Asyraf Raziq Rosli, a 20-year-old Malaysian student.

He was apparently out early to buy food to break his Ramadan fast when he was set upon. The Malaysian Star newspaper reports he was treated in hospital for a broken jaw and disjointed teeth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=327J3ISiVOU
 
Posted by Mucus (Member # 9735) on :
 
quote:
When social media helped protesters organize and overthrow corrupt regimes in the Arab world earlier this year, while also providing citizen journalism when the mainstream media was shut out, it was lauded as a tool of democracy.

However, when the same methods are used in a scenario like Britain, they are seen as disturbing, says Megan Boler, a media studies professor in Toronto.

"Here it's not about a dictator. Here the issue is the corporation as a representative symbol. These things always spiral off into hitting the mom and pop stores, which is unfortunate," says Boler, who teaches at the University of Toronto's Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2011/08/10/social-media-riots.html

An interesting point especially next to the three deaths above.


quote:
A writer named Kami makes the same point with this post on Facebook.

"Cuz [sic] people who protest in the western countries are rioters, looters, and violent enemies of the good state, so social media is the "catalyst." In Egypt and elsewhere, social media was the tool that made revolution against evil dictators possible. Look for facebook [sic] and others to either have a major overhaul, be a tool for arrests/disappearances, or be named an enemy of the state when massive uprisings happen in the US."

I don't know who Kami is, but I wouldn't put money against the last bit given how fast Amazon/Visa/Mastercard/etc. folded during the WikiLeaks incident.
 
Posted by Lyrhawn (Member # 7039) on :
 
To any actual British posters on Hatrack, what the heck is going on over there?

Seems like these riots are a combination of wanton looting and perhaps some below-the-surface rage about recent government actions. Is this all about austerity measures and healthcare reform? Or is it just an excuse to steal stuff? I can't imagine it's all about police brutality, unless London has more of a history of it than I'm aware of. It made sense in LA and other places, where the racists policies of police departments created such a charged divide only waiting for a spark. Is London that bad?
 


Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2