How about this idea. Once you got to marketing your book (to a publisher or agent) you have to write a stellar synopsis. And even once you have an agent you have to improve that synopsis. So, why not start book two with the synopsis? A “What has gone before” chapter much like a prolog but longer?
Anyone read one like that? Think it would work?
Shawn
Ulitmately, it's a hard call. You might consider inserting what I'll call "partial history chapters." I'm sure you've seen it before where the author inserts like a page or two from a "fictional" text. This provides information but in a more creative, narrative way. It appears like you're "fleshing" out your world, giving us a glimpse of something that we wouldn't have ordinarily seen, but in reality you're giving us a needed info dump.
Just my 2 cents worth.
The fictional history insert idea has promise to it as well, especially if it exposed something new (even just a new perspective) on the old info.
I haven't read any Harry Potter boks, so I cannot vouch for this advice.
I imagine the hardest part of this would be striking a balance between providing enough information not to confuse new readers, and yet making sure you don't bore the people who read the books before.
Perhaps it would be best to make the first scene something new even to the first novel, so that at least the begining is interesting to anyone that's read it. Then once you have the readers hooked, you can be a bit more free to give backstory.
Due to the fact that I haven't even written a first novel yet these suggestions are mostly made as an attentive reader, not as someone who's experienced this issue when writing.
My own personal preference is simply to deliver as background info in the form of little details raised periodically.
As a reader I would think myself simply concerned about what happens in the book I'm reading. If anything really relevant has gone on before, then surely the characters involved would make reference to it?
Just a sentence here, a sentence there. Never a long descriptive passage, unless it didn't detract from the style of the book.
Throughout the book, Clancy makes tantalizing allusions to other Jack Ryan stories. I recognize the references to The Hunt for Red October, Patriot Games,[i] and Clear and Present Danger[/i], which I have read. But others I do not recognize. So far, these references have given me a strong desire to read Red Storm Rising and The Cardinal of the Kremlin. Characters in Sum of All Fears refer to those earlier plots as containing very important and exciting events . . . but they do not tell the reader what those events were!
You don't need to read the earlier books to understand the later books. But by the time you finish a later book, you want to read the earlier books. It's like built-in advertising!
That is a very good trick which I would love to use myself. The problem is that this might not be suitable to speculative fiction. Clancy does not need to explain how his world works every time he writes a book.
I thought about the diary kind of prolog, but that turned out boring as all get out. I tried a prolog written from the antagonists POV--shot down by 5 out of 5 who read it. And I agree with them. Then I did the first chapter, it is good, and works but alone it doesn’t draw the reader into the book, no hook. It offers the facts form the previous book that the reader needs to have to understand this book. I just need to figure out how to get the hook in there.
Perhaps I need a hook chapter that has noting to do with the first book, and only this book, to set the hook then go into the set up chapter (the one offering the info from the first book).
Hmm, off to give it a try after I dump that old prolog.
Shawn
If not, I would treat each story as if all other stories were never written for others to read. [This is what Clancy has done.] The facts and events of the previous stories do not act to further the plot of this story, they only act to add to its characterization. In that sense, they are no different from any of the other events that occurred in the character's past and should be lent equal weight. You would not, for the first book, tell the life and times of your main character? There is no reason to do it in the second one.
[This message has been edited by Chipster (edited July 12, 2002).]
Shawn
Does anyone think it's unreasonable for people to start with book one? Even on closed-book series, I always start with the first, it just bothers me not to.
Also, just starting the story and having the main characters think back to the previous events would work also. This is what a lot of series do. What happens is you don't feel as connected with the characters as you would if you started at the beginning. Just putting there memories in when something similar happens works. Sorta using the first book as written backstory for the first. Now that I think about this is better for different stories in the same Milieu.
In the end of this typed up thought process I think that putting in a 'for the unintiated' chapter would probably work. The people who've read the books before can just skip it unless they need a refresher (in fantasy novels you could make it sound like a bard talking and in SF you could make it sound like a historian from the future. Or just be yourself *shrug*). Using the really nice synops would probably work for writing a chapter like this; although they would probably need a little tweaking.
Uberslacker; sorry I rambled.