Like having my hero and company take a shuttle down to a planet, only to discover, after many ineffective re-readings, that the shuttle on the ship had been flown to a nearby ship earlier.
Anyone else?
I've seen them in published books as well. In one by a bestselling author she switched the names of two characters around.
Shawn
All well and good, except that while writing the scene I thought of a great line for the buffoon, so I wrote it. Then I kept writing without thinking further.
You can imagine the first rehersal. It's the middle of the scene, when suddenly a voice offstage shouts the line at the top of his lungs!
JOHN!
[This message has been edited by JOHN (edited January 30, 2003).]
"How now spirit, whither wander you?" ;>
[This message has been edited by Chronicles_of_Empire (edited January 31, 2003).]
[This message has been edited by Chronicles_of_Empire (edited January 31, 2003).]
Luckily it was an easy mistake to fix, and pretty amusing in the long run.
Shasta
I've caught myself changing details about certain characters' appearances. At the beginning of the book, they have green eyes. In the middle, blue. By the end, poof! Green again!
To catch these kinds of boo-boos, I've taken to using the FIND feature in Word, typing in the words "Jane's green eyes", then "Jane's blue eyes" and reading over each reference for consistency. The devil is in the details, as they say!
-- luckily I had my computer read over it (read-please) before I sent it to anyone. the name immediately stuck out, since I didn't remember it as being anyones name in the story.
(Anyone besides me think the embarrassed Smiley is rather dorky and doesn't look embarrassed at all? More like a fake innocent look to me. )
quote:
luckily I had my computer read over it (read-please) before I sent it to anyone. the name immediately stuck out, since I didn't remember it as being anyones name in the story.
I didn't catch this earlier, Mags. I'll bite. What function on your computer caught the error? Or are you being facetious?
BTW what is the technical term for a character who is not the main protagonist, but is a protagonist and and the same time an enemy to the main protagonist from whose POV the story is taking place?
That sounds contradictary I know, but it actually happened in one of my stories.
quote:
I didn't catch this earlier, Mags. I'll bite. What function on your computer caught the error? Or are you being facetious?
I was being serious, actually. There is a program on the market called "Read Please" and it takes text and ... well, reads it out loud. There is a freeware version which allows 4 voices, or a paid version, which allows you more choices on voices, in addition to being able to put in your own - you can also add words in.
The problem that I have reading out loud, is that I tend to pay more attention to what I'm reading and not what I'm hearing. - Which is better than when I was in elementary and middle school where if I read something out loud, I couldn't even tell you what I read so would also have to reread to myself.
Of course this would be easier if the computer could read my manuscripts and find all the errors which editors would, and/or errors that don't fit the genre in question.. but I'm sure that will be a few more years.
I came accross a good one in my series of novels recently. It's more subtle than you think, but after gratuitous rearranging of family ties my main love interests ended up being first cousins. Oops!
There are a few authors out there right now who are doing mysteries which end up being solved by knowing the family tree of the various players.
quote:
BTW what is the technical term for a character who is not the main protagonist, but is a protagonist and and the same time an enemy to the main protagonist from whose POV the story is taking place?
Antagonist? Although I tend to prefer "scheming bastard", but possibly just because that tends to suit my characters particularly well...
You can have a main antagonist, and minor antagonists, and so on.
In fact, I understand that one of the things about a "love interest" as opposed to a "side-kick" is that the "love interest" can be supportive to the protagonist at times and then at other times be antagonistic, where a "side-kick" is supposed to be supportive all the time (or if not a "yes-man" at least be in support of the protagonist's goals).
By the way, an antagonist does not necessarily have to be a "bad guy." All an antagonist needs to do is oppose the goals of the protagonist in some way.
I guess that would be true, wouldn't it
Hard to accept because it is so commonly done that the POV character is a "good guy" in nature, and so this seemed to not work only because it contradicted patterns I was used to seeing in my mind.
That may or may not make sense to you, sorry. I have a tendency to not be able to adequately explain my thinking with the English language.
[This message has been edited by Alias (edited June 25, 2003).]
But what do I know?
Chris