www.manuslit.com/old/Definitions.htm
What do you make of these definitions? Based on your reading in various genres, are they true?
When I nitpick I can find problems with each definition . . . well, SF, fantasy, horror, mainstream, and literary--those which I read on a regular basis.
I think this is helpful. Perhaps not because the definitions are accurate, but because this is how the genres are preceived by the publishing industry.
[This message has been edited by October (edited May 06, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by Silver6 (edited May 06, 2004).]
There are exceptions. My favorite romance novel, "Wishes" by Jude Devereaux, is an exception. The man in that novel was married a while back and had been mourning the loss of his wife and child (both dead in childbirth) until he came upon the heroine. But in reality, it still shares some of the same elements of the "wild" man. He is experienced whereas she is a virgin (also very common, but with some exceptions), and he had no interest in women at all until he meets our hero. (Though for a different reason than the normal one given.)
Then again, I don't think comprehensive and universally agreed-upon genre definitions exist. As with the old saw on obscenity, you know it when you see it. Genre definitions are there to market books to the people who will be interested in reading them, not to restrict what people can write/get published (although they probably have that effect-- cf Jean Auel and Frank Herbert as two who got bounced a lot for not fitting the marketing structures).
From under the "Literary" heading: "But, in general, a literary novel tends to be much more character driven than a commercial novel." Man, don't tell the SF magazines. Character-driven stories seem to be a frequent guideline must.... I would say [some literary novels] seem more character driven because they are so much less plot-driven, not because the characters are actually doing more protagging.
Science Fiction: Involves an extrapolation or divergence from current scientific theory, either as an issue of the plot or as part of the background.
Fantasy: There's magic in it.
Crime/Detective/Police/Mystery: A crime is investigated.
Romance: A woman and a man fall in love.
Thriller/Espionage: Something bad is going to happen to a person or country unless the hero or heroes can stop it in time.
Horror/Psychic/Supernatural: Ewww! or Brrrr!
New Age/Inspirational: A parable meant to teach you a lesson.
Historical: Takes place in the past.
Courtoom Drama/Legal Thriller: There will be a miscarriage of justice unless a heroic lawyer can stop it.
Gay/Lesbian: The most important characters are gay or lesbian. Or both.
Commercial/Mainstream: Sells well, reviews poorly.
Literary: Reviews well, sells poorly.
And, even though they didn't mention it, I'll throw it in for free - Western: Has horses, cattle, cowboys, and/or Indians.
There is no set list of qualifiers for what puts something in a genre. I believe there are elements that push it one way or another, but there's no scoring system, no "passing grade". There's just the general feeling of whether it's Science Fiction or Fantasy, Mystery or Romance. And the day somebody makes a list of these elements or a scoring system and says that this is the way things are, I'll laugh at them.
These discussions always end up being silly, because nobody can ever 'win', and everyone is at least partially right.
[This message has been edited by AeroB1033 (edited May 07, 2004).]
quote:
Fantasy is often lumped together with Science Fiction, though the two genres are quite different
Somebody hasn't spent much time reading at least one of those two genres, I suspect both, and it has lead them to not realise that the differences are almost entirely superficial.
The difference I perceive between the two genres is mainly stylistic. I'm also afraid that in fantasy, in particular, the genre's potential has, up to now, been wasted on endless repetitions of Tolkien's Lord of the Rings or on stories that boil down to a D&D adventure game in book form. I am wary of these types of stories and long for a day when, in a world in which anything can happen, anything actually does happen.
But it is probably very valuable for the writer deciding whether or not to waste time and effort sending something to Manus & Friends.
quote:
The key element of Science Fiction is believability
Isn't nice that only SCI-FI has to be believable. I fell sorry for you SCI-FI authors. I'm glad I write fantasy, according to Manus and Assoc., what I write doesn't have to be believable.
Rux
:}