Here's another example:
"For the first time Alex heard sounds other than the hum of vent fans. He heard... birds?"
Any guidance on this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
It usually denotes an unfinished thought or action.
It wouldn't work for your first example, but works well in your second example.
Write the pause, don't indicate it with ellipses. Ellipses as a pause is cyberchat standard. Would your characters in your story rofl?
"I went down to the," she paused, "the kitchen where, "she paused, "where I found," she paused, "I found," she paused, "I saw the blood and then," she paused, "he was dead!"
Much better to show the stammering, flustered character speaking with elipses in a case like this:
"I went down to the...the kitchen where...where I found...I found..I saw the blood and then...he was dead!"
It would be very, very easy to overuse this, though. I think MOST pauses should be spelled out. It's a pause, so it's okay to pause the dialogue.
However, I am always keeping in mind that, like all "rules" in writing, there is a time and place that it can be broken.
But, to break a rule in writing, you do have to be fully cogniscient of what you are doing and why it would be wrong and what makes it right in that particular case.
"Well, I, um, sort of had to just say ..." he hung his head, "no."
I can't find any reference to it in Strunk and White, and a number of other sources only reference its use for omissions in quotations, but this seems to indicate that it is acceptable in dialogue.
I know Wikipedia isn't necessarily the best resource, but I'm having trouble finding others. Can anyone who is suggesting that ... is not to be used as a pause have any resources or references to support your assertions?
Also, I can't imagine why you would deny any tool in the writer's toolbox. Come on, never use exclamation points? That's nuts! Like anything else, they can be overused and I think this particular tool has more power if it is very infrequently used, but it's there and I intend to use it!
ALL CAPS is not grammatically correct, though. IMHO, that's a tool used by people who overuse exclamation points to mark something that really needs emphasis. I use it on-line only because it's easier than stopping and using boldface or italics for emphasis. I hate it when people type entirely in all caps in message forums and I refuse to read posts by someone who does that.
As for my examples, which were both in the voice of the narrator, the first, I've decided to change the text from "good ... long ... time." to " a very long time."
The other example I'm keeping as is (except that I've learned from the Guide to Grammar website that there should be a space between the ... and the two words surrounding it. He heard … birds?)
In another place I'm taking Christine's advice and using "he paused" instead of "..." . It more clearly explains what is happening.
On the other hand, in another place I am keeping the "..." where it is creating the effect I want. "What in the … " he exclaimed.
When I finish the draft (about 10-12K words) I'll be looking here for some readers/critiques. Thanks again for all your help!
"Blah blah blah . . . "
Has anyone else ever heard of this?
quote:
No, Mitch is wrong, completely.
Write the pause, don't indicate it with ellipses. Ellipses as a pause is cyberchat standard. Would your characters in your story rofl?
No, pantros is wrong, completely. Several people in this thread have elaborated on legitimate ways for dialogue to have an ellipsis included. The main point of my original post, however was that the narration shouldn't include them. pantros, you're yet to explain to me why it's okay for a narrator to use them, so why do you say I'm "completely" wrong?
An ellipsis at the end of the sentence should also have an additional dot, for the period. I see this ignored an awful lot, though.
I don't think using an ellipsis for a pause is generally a good idea. For one thing, lots of dots all over the page is annoying to read and looks amateurish. (And is amateurish. ) On the other hand, many of the "intended to be longer" pauses actually omit words. Many of the examples above fall into this category, and so are completely correct. The most recent is (let me look):
quote:Another place this can happen is when a character starts to say something, then changes his/her mind about what to say or how to say it: "What I'm trying to say is . . . oh, why do I even bother?" Or: "I wonder why that guy is . . . it looks like he's petting his car." A comma there would be incorrect.
"What in the . . . " he exclaimed.
About the only time I feel it would be proper to use an ellipsis for a simple pause is if words are initially omitted, due to the character not having the right words ready, but after a moment's thought the character picks up where he left off. Thus, the omitted words are eventually supplied, and in retrospect, one might say that an ellipsis wasn't necessary. But it seems like it might be okay with me, as long as it isn't done too often. However, every case I'm able to think of would be better handled without any dots, or with a "he paused", or with a first attempt followed by a rephrasing. So I'm saying, maybe it could be done without bothering me, but in almost (at least) all cases it could be done better one of the other ways.
[This message has been edited by rickfisher (edited August 19, 2006).]
"Newspapers sometimes use the ellipsis interchangeably with the dash...which can be quite irritating...as its proper uses are quite specific, and very few: 1. To indicate words missing...from a quoted passage 2. To trail of in an intriguing manner..." (165-66 Truss)
According to Patricia T. O'Connor's "Woe is I":
"A Dash is "A punctuation mark that interrupts a sentence to insert another thought. One can act like a colon: It was every mother's nightmare--ringworm. Or a pair of dashes can be used like parentheses: The remedy was easy enough--a simple oral medication--but what would she tell the neighbors?" (208)
She writes on page 144 that dashes tend to be overused and try to compensate for weak writing.
By the way...is it just me...or does it bug anyone else...when people talk....like this...on the internet...
[This message has been edited by Elan (edited August 22, 2006).]
I also wouldn't use an em-dash in manuscript format. Always "--".
When published, yes, they will turn "--" into an em-dash, just as they will turn all your underlines to italics.
Example: "If we don't inject you with the antivenin in time..." he trailed off and let the horror of it speak for itself.
"You mean-"
"That's right. You'll turn into a giant pastry."
What would be the correct way to write that sort of conversation if dashes and ellipses are frowned upon?
The second line should also end in ...
Improper Use of ellipses would be:
That's right. You'll turn into...a giant pastry.
But I think the second line is also correct (except that it needs two hyphens: -- instead of - ). The ellipsis is for omitted words, and words were certainly omitted in: "You mean--". But they weren't omitted voluntarily; the weren't left out. The speaker was interrupted. An em-dash (or two hyphens) is ideal in that situation.