This is a near-future sociological science fiction novel (109,400 words long).
I wrote this between two fantasy novels. Am I loading too much science into the opening? I am braced for comments about the properties of plexiglass, and welcome any suggestions for different materials to use.
Most importantly, would you keep reading?
A twenty-centimeter-thick plexiglass wall separated Dr. Heinrich Glessen from the best thing that had ever happened to him. Through the glass, Dr. Glessen could watch the Pharows mill about in their natural habitat. Glessen could tell the old from the young, the Lingots from the Narises.
The plexiglass was a curiosity to the Pharows. Every day Lingots and Narises flocked like tourists to the Cote d'Azure to see the plexiglass wall that the Company techs had built on one side of their excavated tunnel. Dr. Glessen believed the Narises could pick up his scent, and the scent of the research team, even through the plexiglass. The Lingots could make out little of the nature of humanity by sliding their long, purple-black tongues over the surface of the glass. Streaks of dried saliva smeared
[This message has been edited by Kathleen Dalton Woodbury (edited January 18, 2006).]
So, to answer your questions: I did feel like the science in the opening was intrusive/distracting, but the critters were interesting enough that I probably would read at least a bit more.
(EDIT: I need to wait until after Kathy comes through and cuts things down to 13 lines--this is the second time I've made a comment referencing the last line of a post and then that line disappears!)
[This message has been edited by RedSakana (edited January 18, 2006).]
Try and let us get to know the main POV character of this scene first, then throw all this other stuff at us.
My 2 cents....
Nits:
I can't believe any scent can get *through* Plexiglas. So I thought Dr. Whatshis was naive.
The spelling is Plexiglas, one s. Yeah, that's weird. It's a brand name.
This line bothers me. The first part and the second don't match up somehow.
It could be as simple as an "a" in the first part--
The Lingots could make out a little of the nature of humanity by sliding their long, purple-black tongues
--which doesn't make sense to me. How can licking the glass tell them anything, but that's a different kind of a nit. I guess they can somehow in your story.
I've alternated between the choice of these two words so many times! Many of you have pointed out the correct way of writing Plexiglas. But as Johnmac1953 noted, it is much better to avoid using trademarks when writing/publishing.
So I did some research and found two different sources (American Heritage Dictionary and Princeton University's WordNet) who note:
"This trademark also occurs in many instances lowercased and spelled plexiglass"
So I had settled on using the non-trademarked, lower case version of the word.
I've been so concerned that an editor is going to jump at "plexiglass" with his red pen and chuck out the manuscript, that I have been seriously considering using another material- just to avoid this conundrum!
One last note- is there a word count (as opposed to a line count) available as a guideline for postings? I double checked my post for length and came up with 12.5 both times. I would have been happy to run a word count on the post to save Kathy (and commenters) time!
quote:
is there a word count (as opposed to a line count) available as a guideline for postings? I double checked my post for length and came up with 12.5 both times. I would have been happy to run a word count on the post to save Kathy (and commenters) time!
My name is Kathleen, not Kathy, okay?
It's not a word count. It's a line count because we're talking about the first page of a properly prepared manuscript--13 lines of 12-point courier font on 8.5x11-inch paper with 1-inch margins.
Will the reader of your properly prepared manuscript be interested enough to continue reading and therefore turn to the second page?