High above an unnamed valley, in an effacing mountain cave, Joseph Kinh sat daydreaming atop a broad cedar log ornately hewn with images of faces sweeping round in a petrified breeze. Behind him, the firelight painted the cave wall with glowing amber, blending with the setting sunlight outside. He breathed steadily, paced by the flow of a dusky breeze that had just swirled into the cave. Winds, gusts, and breezes always carried songs, and Kinh would sit in his cave and listen to the songs they brought with them, paying heed to ones that hummed of places where he was needed, encroaching dangers he was to be wary of. The breeze that now swirled about his cave carried with it just such a song. Kinh raised his hand gently and moved his outstretched fingers slightly. He closed his eyes and spoke
[This message has been edited by Kathleen Dalton Woodbury (edited April 12, 2006).]
usky cannot be used to describe a breeze it's an adverb; petrified cannot be used to describe a breeze. It can be used as a noun, a verb, and an adverb.Whose POV is this? It can't be Joseph's. He wouldn't see the cave wall behind him. And I don't know what he's feeling. I'd say this not knowing is a big issue.
There are incorrect uses of words (to efface means to wipe out or erase and it is a verb; petrified breeze is an oxymoron; dusky breeze does not make sense either).
This whole section is overloaded with adjectives and adverbs. Actually the section is overworded in general, which slows the reader down and actually weakens the writing.
For instance - saying "Winds, gusts, and breezes" is not superior to just saying "The wind always carried..."
Also, there are verb tense changes that are awkward.
The writing is obfuscated by the wordiness, but even so, some passages such as "bitter chill that suffused lifeless bodies" does not make any sense to me.
I think you are trying to go for a poetic style of prose here, but as written it just isn't working.
quote:I have to ask why. Since he is obviously familiar with talking to the wind, I would expect him to know about extreme cold. If it's necessary to not wear some sort of handcovering, maybe that should be mentioned.
The cold, biting breeze numbed his fingertips.
Yeah, dusky, well dusk, is a time of day, so that doesn't really work. And I could mention all the other things, but I'd just be repeating people. Why do you call him Kinh? Isn't his name Joseph? The last name thing sorta only works in newspapers and articles and places like that. Why's he move his hand? Is really all that important? It's like saying, "And then Sally took a breath," like, wasn't she breathing before? Well, that's what I think. Some people may agree, some may not, but good luck with the editing!P.S. Having the wind sing a poetic verse is a little cliche. You may lose a lot of people like me who have a habit of skipping poems, no matter how important they are.
I like the feel of the things you are describing, but as others have said I think you use too many adjectives and adverbs. Simplify that, but maybe put in a metaphor somewhere if you can find a good one. Often a good metaphor can take the place of a few whole sentences of description.
quote:
Winds, gusts, and breezes always carried songs,
I'll grant that it is redundant as written, which has been noted above, but it is also the most interesting thing about this. It appears to set up the premise of the whole story all by itself. I would recommend it being the only line in the first paragraph, then move on to introduce the main character and setting in new paragraphs.