[This message has been edited by dreadlord (edited February 15, 2007).]
I also have lost some trust in the narrator. "The very families that serve them": the powerful families serve the people? More likely that the people serve the powerful families. Such ambition can only lead to civil war: it could lead to several other things, too.
I think zooming in on a character will fix much of this.
[This message has been edited by wbriggs (edited February 14, 2007).]
Give me a character I can care about. Whether its a good guy or a bad guy, I need someone that I can feel emotion for, one way or another.
Such ambition can only lead to one place: Civil War. Huh? Maybe such ambition will only lead to a democratic majority in the house and senate. Or the ambition may lead to a toga party. Give me a main character who believes that such ambition can only lead to civil war, then I might buy it. A main character can have opinions, the narrator should not.
Matt
That said, the approach here is far superior to what you originally had (which sounded like a first attempt at a cover blurb, rather than the actual start of a novel). However, the execution still needs improvement.
Some things are mechanical: always capitalizing "his" or "he", for example. At first (because it was consistent) I thought it meant that Marcus Julius had the status of a god--but then you kept on doing it in reference to the captive. Another thing: make sure you remember to capitalize the start of all sentences.
Watch out for excess wordage, as in: "Marcus Julius strode forward towards a captured man." If he strode backward, it would be worth pointing out, but "forward" can be dropped. Also, we'll assume the captive is a man (especially given the time period) unless you tell us otherwise.
The whole thing with hoping to break the captive doesn't really make sense. You give good reasons for not expecting him to break, so hoping that he will, under the circumstances, seems pointless. Especially since the captive is hardly even given a chance; you abruptly jump to giving the order for execution. The scene as presented is almost funny: Marcus Julius striding toward the captive with a glower on his face, thinking: Maybe this'll break him. Okay, I'm halfway there, and he still hasn't broken. Three-quarters of the way . . . seven-eighths. Rats, he's still on his feet. "Okay, kill him." You should at least have Julius say something like, "This is your last chance, barbarian."
What color did the Gauls usually dye their hair, and what color are their usual leggings? And why did it take so long for Julius to notice? I mean, the guy's been around for long enough to be processed by the extractor. If the hair color is distinctive, it should have been noticed long since, and if it's not all that striking, what makes Julius notice it now?
[This message has been edited by rickfisher (edited February 15, 2007).]
Matt
Nit: wouldn't the torturer have already reported, "This Gaul is a dissident, and told me everything I asked," if Marcus's speculation is right?