Hatrack River Writers Workshop   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Writers Workshop » Forums » Fragments and Feedback for Short Works » Chrysalis - crazy idea rewrite

   
Author Topic: Chrysalis - crazy idea rewrite
MaryRobinette
Member
Member # 1680

 - posted      Profile for MaryRobinette   Email MaryRobinette         Edit/Delete Post 
In my effort to solve a problem with the story I decided to do shake things up a bit. For those who've read the whole thing, do you have any thoughts about shifting this to 1stPOV?

---

People ask me if I ever get involved with the subjects I document. I tend to grit my teeth and answer very patiently with another question. How could I do my job if I were part of the story? Only by maintaining the sacred distance could I have any hope of understanding someone's life. A documentarian records, but does not participate.

I was repeating that mantra while Geroth and Iliath had their latest spat next to me. Iliath wanted Geroth to undergo Chrysalis. Geroth wanted to stave it off until he finished his mathematical treatise.

Even if Geroth hadn't asked me to, I might've turned the camera off as soon as Iliath had said, "Beloved, would you look at the invitation list for your Hatching Day?" I mean, how many examples of this conversation would Geroth need in the documentary of his life?


Posts: 2022 | Registered: Jul 2003  | Report this post to a Moderator
Beth
Member
Member # 2192

 - posted      Profile for Beth   Email Beth         Edit/Delete Post 
Oooh, that might work! You're opening with the main conflict, for one thing. I am very curious about how this version is going to turn out and would happily take a look - but I hope you will also get a number of fresh eyes looking at it.
Posts: 1750 | Registered: Oct 2004  | Report this post to a Moderator
onepktjoe
Member
Member # 2352

 - posted      Profile for onepktjoe   Email onepktjoe         Edit/Delete Post 
Hi Mary,

My first thought was, "Don't you dare!" But that was because I liked the 3rdP version so much. Reading this opening, though, I can definitely see how 1stP might be fascinating to explore. I think I'd like to take a look, too.

Joe


Posts: 230 | Registered: Feb 2005  | Report this post to a Moderator
Jeraliey
Member
Member # 2147

 - posted      Profile for Jeraliey   Email Jeraliey         Edit/Delete Post 
I don't know if you need to take THAT drastic a step, but I was actually hoping that you'd get a little closer to your narrator during the story. When I read it, I felt that she wasn't affected by the events of the story and I kinda thought she should have taken them closer to heart.

If you want a read, I'd love to help you out...and this time I actually have time to give you feedback! It's a neat idea, and a nicely done story.


Posts: 1041 | Registered: Aug 2004  | Report this post to a Moderator
Dude
Member
Member # 1957

 - posted      Profile for Dude   Email Dude         Edit/Delete Post 
I remember this from the last time. It seems that this beginning is much stronger. Your narrator's voice is better. The first sentence in the last paragraph is a bit awkward, but other than that is sounds good. Maybe if you change might've to would've. Might've just didn't seem to fit there.
Are you looking for readers?

Posts: 266 | Registered: Mar 2004  | Report this post to a Moderator
MaryRobinette
Member
Member # 1680

 - posted      Profile for MaryRobinette   Email MaryRobinette         Edit/Delete Post 
Jeraliey, I'm trying to remember which draft you read... Ah. Draft4. Draft 4 went through three more revisions trying to fix the distance at the beginning. Then I tried a Draft5, which didn't help, so I think it's inherent to the structure. This is Draft 6. sigh. It bears almost no resemblence to the story I started writing, except the characters and setting. Sorry, can you tell I'm frustrated?

Dude, I'll change it to "might have" but "would 've" would change the meaning. Thanks for pointing out that it snagged.

I'm not sure if I want readers. I mean. I do, but I know that the narrator voice is uneven still and there's a section that I need but is completely out of place in this format. It think I just wanted reactions to the idea at this point.


Posts: 2022 | Registered: Jul 2003  | Report this post to a Moderator
shadowynd
Member
Member # 2077

 - posted      Profile for shadowynd   Email shadowynd         Edit/Delete Post 
I think your use of 1st POV works well in this case, and I'm pretty persnickety about the use of 1st.

Susan


Posts: 350 | Registered: Jul 2004  | Report this post to a Moderator
Jeraliey
Member
Member # 2147

 - posted      Profile for Jeraliey   Email Jeraliey         Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah, the frustration is pretty evident. Sorry you're having trouble.

Just let me know if there's anything I can help with!


Posts: 1041 | Registered: Aug 2004  | Report this post to a Moderator
Survivor
Member
Member # 213

 - posted      Profile for Survivor   Email Survivor         Edit/Delete Post 
The difficulty is that you hadn't really captured the epiphany of the story. What J says about "she should have taken them closer to heart." That isn't a problem with the text, it's a problem with the events of the story.

Shifting this to first person might force you to change that event, since having the first person account makes no sense unless the character experiences the epiphany, causing her to write the story. But you have to craft the event first, simply writing the story in first person won't cause that event to be part of the story.

This story is a bit complicated, because there are several different possible epiphanies competing here. In the first version I read, the main epiphany seemed to be more personal, watching Geroth go through Chrysalis helped her to understand her own life better, and the price she'd paid to live it. In the last version, that epiphany is almost totally subordinated to the epiphany that the act of documentation is not neutral or free of consequences, and "good work" is aimed at desireable results rather than being a function of process. The story makes a fine vehicle for exploring that quandry as well.

I think that you could probably link these two epiphanies through her grandmother's messages. After all, they are to her as her documentary will be to Gero, in a sense. And coming to understand Geroth and what he faces in the context of her own life gives her a stronger motive.

But like I said, setting this in first person doesn't inherently do any of that.


Posts: 8322 | Registered: Aug 1999  | Report this post to a Moderator
MaryRobinette
Member
Member # 1680

 - posted      Profile for MaryRobinette   Email MaryRobinette         Edit/Delete Post 
Survivor, you are one of the few people who read the draft with her grandmother. The thing I've been thinking about today (I'm trying to let the thing stew a bit) is that I was originally interested in the idea that we are created from our memories, so I set up a story to explore that.

I'm thinking about going back to that, because a story about work ethic isn't that interesting to me.

But I had, as you point out, so many different epiphanies that I wound up with two stories that were spliced together at the middle. The thought I had today was to return to the idea of memories and bring Grandma back. I'm thinking of staying in the 1st POV and having the whole thing be Vanessa writing to her grandmother, who is of course dead because of the whole relativity thing. I don't know. I need to sleep on it a bit more.

The other thought that I've had is that I should return to draft 4 (I think) and just make the thing longer. I think I'm trying to do too much in too little space.


Posts: 2022 | Registered: Jul 2003  | Report this post to a Moderator
Elan
Member
Member # 2442

 - posted      Profile for Elan           Edit/Delete Post 
Based on what you've presented here, versus what I read the last time, I think I actually prefer the 1st person POV. I hooked right into it this time, which was not the case the last time. (*Looks back at all the times I just wrote "time" and realizes the time is after midnight, and that my brain shut down hours ago.*)

At any rate, I think this version is cleaner and more engaging. And now it's time to go to bed.


Posts: 2026 | Registered: Mar 2005  | Report this post to a Moderator
Beth
Member
Member # 2192

 - posted      Profile for Beth   Email Beth         Edit/Delete Post 
Instead of making it longer to try to do more, maybe keep it shorter and simplify? Personally I am kind of biased against longer stories, though; going short may not be the right approach for this piece.
Posts: 1750 | Registered: Oct 2004  | Report this post to a Moderator
HSO
Member
Member # 2056

 - posted      Profile for HSO   Email HSO         Edit/Delete Post 
I like the idea of a 1st person approach. As long as the ending has the same impact as before, I say go for it. I really liked the ending of the 3rd person version... would be shame, in my opinion, if you lost that in the translation to 1st.


Posts: 1520 | Registered: Jun 2004  | Report this post to a Moderator
MaryRobinette
Member
Member # 1680

 - posted      Profile for MaryRobinette   Email MaryRobinette         Edit/Delete Post 
[edited to remove whining]

Let's see what people say about draft six before I start trying new things.

Readers?

[This message has been edited by MaryRobinette (edited May 08, 2005).]


Posts: 2022 | Registered: Jul 2003  | Report this post to a Moderator
HSO
Member
Member # 2056

 - posted      Profile for HSO   Email HSO         Edit/Delete Post 
I only saw the comment about gnawing one's arm off... was that whining you were referring to?

Send it, Mary. I'll read the 40th draft if it comes to that, but by then, I'll be so biased as my opinion will be useless. Nevertheless, I've only read one draft, and if I drink enough wine at dinner tonight, I'll probably not remember what I read on the previous draft.


Posts: 1520 | Registered: Jun 2004  | Report this post to a Moderator
MaryRobinette
Member
Member # 1680

 - posted      Profile for MaryRobinette   Email MaryRobinette         Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah. That would be it. I might start a discussion in Open Discussions about it.

I'll send it over. Thanks for reading.


Posts: 2022 | Registered: Jul 2003  | Report this post to a Moderator
Jeraliey
Member
Member # 2147

 - posted      Profile for Jeraliey   Email Jeraliey         Edit/Delete Post 
Me!
Posts: 1041 | Registered: Aug 2004  | Report this post to a Moderator
MCameron
Member
Member # 2391

 - posted      Profile for MCameron   Email MCameron         Edit/Delete Post 
If you want fresh eyes, I'll read.

--Mel


Posts: 269 | Registered: Feb 2005  | Report this post to a Moderator
Survivor
Member
Member # 213

 - posted      Profile for Survivor   Email Survivor         Edit/Delete Post 
Oh! I like the idea of having it be a letter to her Grandmother.
Posts: 8322 | Registered: Aug 1999  | Report this post to a Moderator
Dude
Member
Member # 1957

 - posted      Profile for Dude   Email Dude         Edit/Delete Post 
I would like to read this one. my e-mail is fsilv01s@uis.edu.
Posts: 266 | Registered: Mar 2004  | Report this post to a Moderator
MaryRobinette
Member
Member # 1680

 - posted      Profile for MaryRobinette   Email MaryRobinette         Edit/Delete Post 
Dude and Mel, I've just sent it off to you.

Survivor, if this draft doesn't work, you'll be at the top of the list for Draft 7.


Posts: 2022 | Registered: Jul 2003  | Report this post to a Moderator
rickfisher
Member
Member # 1214

 - posted      Profile for rickfisher   Email rickfisher         Edit/Delete Post 
The only problem I have with the new beginning is the present tense of the opening paragraph. It's telling me that, no, she doesn't take part in what she's documenting. The only way for this to make sense to me is if the rest of the story demonstrates the truth of that sentiment, probably by telling of a time when she chose to take part and it ended tragically.

If you replaced "I tend to grit my teeth..." with something like "I always used to grit my teeth..." then I don't think I'd have any problem with it.

I also like the idea of a letter to Grandma. I always liked the Grandma story, but didn't feel that you had properly integrated the two stories before.

And of course I will read any version you choose to send me.

[This message has been edited by rickfisher (edited May 09, 2005).]


Posts: 932 | Registered: Jul 2001  | Report this post to a Moderator
MaryRobinette
Member
Member # 1680

 - posted      Profile for MaryRobinette   Email MaryRobinette         Edit/Delete Post 
My dear Mr. Fisher,

You are so very right about the present tense. I was trying to avoid it and see that I missed a spot.

As for Grandmother...let me see what the current readers say. I think I need a week away from it before I do another big overhaul.

Sincerely yours,
MaryRobinette
(Mrs. R.A. Kowal)


Posts: 2022 | Registered: Jul 2003  | Report this post to a Moderator
Jeraliey
Member
Member # 2147

 - posted      Profile for Jeraliey   Email Jeraliey         Edit/Delete Post 
Hey, Mary....Grandmother isn't in my copy. Is that intentional?
Posts: 1041 | Registered: Aug 2004  | Report this post to a Moderator
MaryRobinette
Member
Member # 1680

 - posted      Profile for MaryRobinette   Email MaryRobinette         Edit/Delete Post 
Oh yeah, Survivor and Mr. Fisher are talking about early, early drafts. Survivor is one of two people who read draft one. Mr. Fisher read draft...three? Anyway, I cut Grandma after I ran it through my critique group. I won't explain why she was in the story, because I might try to restore that aspect and would need clean eyes. I'm hoping this draft holds though.
Posts: 2022 | Registered: Jul 2003  | Report this post to a Moderator
Doc Brown
Member
Member # 1118

 - posted      Profile for Doc Brown   Email Doc Brown         Edit/Delete Post 
I think your new opening is much stronger because it introduces two conflicts. You've got the McGuffin conflict between Geroth & Iliath, and the real conflict which takes place in the narrator's conscience.

My only caution about switching to first person is that it becomes very difficult to introduce your narrator. You need to give details like your narrator's name and description at appropriate moments, and these moments are difficult to create in first person.


Posts: 976 | Registered: May 2001  | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2