Hatrack River Writers Workshop   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Writers Workshop » Forums » Open Discussions About Writing » Battlestar Galactica's Ending

   
Author Topic: Battlestar Galactica's Ending
Nicole
Member
Member # 3549

 - posted      Profile for Nicole   Email Nicole         Edit/Delete Post 
I don't know if this topic's been discussed here or if it can be. If this is not the place for this post, feel free to remove it.

I wonder what you guys think about the ending.

If you haven't seen it, stop reading here.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

God did it all. Technology is bad so let's get rid of it, let's forget the lessons we've learned. Let's chuck our ships into the Sun. Characters disappear and go somewhere. I think of Kara at Season 1 and 2, all that she went through and for what? What did she learn? After all ends she goes: Yeap, my work here is done. Bye Lee."

But here's my biggest disappointment: I just wonder, how many of you would use God as an explanation for everything that happend in your sci-fi novel?


Posts: 89 | Registered: Jul 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Elan
Member
Member # 2442

 - posted      Profile for Elan           Edit/Delete Post 
I think there is a difference between a story with a "deus ex machina" ending, and a story that has had the god element firmly woven into the narrative. If the god element to the ending of Battlestar surprised you, then you haven't been watching the entire series. I thought the series wrap up was well done.

If you want to see a current movie that has a "deus ex machina" ending, go see "Knowing" starring Nicholas Cage. It was a pretty good movie until about 3/4 of the way through, when it took a decidely weird twist that left me, in the theatre, feeling cheated. Even my boyfriend, who is not a writer, walked out of the theater saying "It's like they couldn't figure out how to wrap up the plot so they threw that in to resolve it."


Posts: 2026 | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
aspirit
Member
Member # 7974

 - posted      Profile for aspirit   Email aspirit         Edit/Delete Post 
Generally, that's called deus ex machina. However, BG's ending sounds like it was consistent with the whole of the show, as there was a strong religious theme from the start. I'd stopped watching the show partly because I'm not interested in a "God is in control, humans must realize that to survive" story.

Enough viewers enjoyed the plot to make the show a success, so "God as an explanation for everything" can work. Without the early foreshadowing, though, the ending wouldn't have.

*Edited to add: Looks like Elan and I wanted to make the same point at the same time. **Edited again to correct a misspelling.

[This message has been edited by aspirit (edited April 05, 2009).]


Posts: 1139 | Registered: May 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Elan
Member
Member # 2442

 - posted      Profile for Elan           Edit/Delete Post 
Deus = the Latin word for God, or deity.
A definition of Deus ex machina, according to Wikipedia (the brainless, quick and easy reference source)

[This message has been edited by Elan (edited April 12, 2009).]


Posts: 2026 | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Natej11
Member
Member # 8547

 - posted      Profile for Natej11   Email Natej11         Edit/Delete Post 
Speaking as a BG fan, I thought the ending went exactly where the final season was leading it, and wrapped it up okay. The entire "throw our ships in the sun and live as cavemen" thing was a bit hard to swallow. Not that they'd make that choice since they'd been complaining about how they couldn't seem to break the cycle, but that ALL of them would make it.

If they'd put those who still wanted to roam on the ships and jumped them away, then scrubbed Earth's location I would have been more satisfied, but all in all it was a good ending to a good series.


Posts: 620 | Registered: Mar 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Nicole
Member
Member # 3549

 - posted      Profile for Nicole   Email Nicole         Edit/Delete Post 
>>>If the god element to the ending of Battlestar surprised you, then you haven't been watching the entire series.

I watched it all and I loved it and I never thought the ultimate explanantion for everything would be that there's a "God with a plan and that IT sends Angels to help it happen". There was religion but how many times has religious myths have been used in sci-fi to cover some ancient race of superevolved ETs or "whatever you want that's not just God".

I was watching sci-fi, so my assumption wasn't so crazy.

If you felt it ended okay, Elan, fine. Some people liked the ending, some didn't. No sense arguing about that.

I wasn't suprised there was a God (ever since Baltar went Jesus the parallels were clear), I was suprised by how many elements of the story fell back on this invisible force that sent coordinates via a Bob Dylan song and doesn't like to be called "God".

In any case, none of you answered my question: How many of *you* would use God as an explanation for everything in your sci-fi novel?

That was my question.

[This message has been edited by Nicole (edited April 05, 2009).]


Posts: 89 | Registered: Jul 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
MartinV
Member
Member # 5512

 - posted      Profile for MartinV   Email MartinV         Edit/Delete Post 
I admit that I felt they rushed through the ending. But I liked it anyway. Battlestar Galactica is the best thing that happened to television after Firefly.
Posts: 1271 | Registered: May 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
aspirit
Member
Member # 7974

 - posted      Profile for aspirit   Email aspirit         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Check your spelling before correcting mine

Elan, I hadn't seen your post when I created mine. My misspelling was an oversight.


Posts: 1139 | Registered: May 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Natej11
Member
Member # 8547

 - posted      Profile for Natej11   Email Natej11         Edit/Delete Post 
IMO the Gods solves everything ending is kind of like punching the reader in the face. Here you have a character whose world is in tatters fighting with every scrap that remains to him to make it right, and in the end he fails and god/the police/the government/etc comes and solves it for him.

Terry Goodkind is a great example of this. In the end it isn't Richard's strength, brilliance, or innovation that saves them from certain doom, it's a gimmick that mages in the distant past designed godlike power SPECIFICALLY for him, and he uses it to make all the bad things go away. I wasn't thrilled about the books leading up to them because they seemed to do nothing but preach and describe atrocities, but this firmly clamped a seal down on any respect I might have had for Goodkind.

Readers want to see characters fighting and struggling to succeed, and in the end even if they have some help in the fight, the killing blow (as it were) should be theirs. The writer who solves his character's problem for him isn't doing anyone, least of all himself, a favor.

Otherwise you find yourself wondering stuff like why Richard couldn't have just

*spoiler alert for Sword of Truth series*

shoved the Sword of Truth into a box of Orden in the first book and saved everyone a lot of wasted time.


Posts: 620 | Registered: Mar 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Nicole
Member
Member # 3549

 - posted      Profile for Nicole   Email Nicole         Edit/Delete Post 
>>>IMO the Gods solves everything ending is kind of like punching the reader in the face. Here you have a character whose world is in tatters fighting with every scrap that remains to him to make it right, and in the end he fails and god/the police/the government/etc comes and solves it for him.

I agree, Natej. And by Gods I didn't mean just a literal God, I mean any omniscient force that has unlimited powers all across the universe. I'd love an omniscient force with "issues", though. That'd be fun.

MartinV, I felt the same. I'm not saying the ending was horrible, I did tear up in a few places. I just thought it'd be something as sublime as say, the episode 33 in season 1. But I was a bit bothered by what Natej mentioned in his/her first post. And I agree, BSG was the best thing since Firefly.

I'll always be a Browncoat.


Posts: 89 | Registered: Jul 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robert Nowall
Member
Member # 2764

 - posted      Profile for Robert Nowall   Email Robert Nowall         Edit/Delete Post 
Truth to tell, I've avoided the whole thing. The campy 1970s version left a bad taste in my mouth...I know this one was nothing like that, but nothing I heard about it thrilled me enough to make me look into it and watch the show. Hope you guys got something out of it, though.
Posts: 8809 | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Natej11
Member
Member # 8547

 - posted      Profile for Natej11   Email Natej11         Edit/Delete Post 
If you're the type of person who likes to sit through a TV series I would highly recommend BG now that it's finished. I watched it when it was into season four so for about a week I was pretty much watching one episode after another. It remains one of my most highly recommended TV series in spite of the somewhat lackluster final season.
Posts: 620 | Registered: Mar 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Meredith
Member
Member # 8368

 - posted      Profile for Meredith   Email Meredith         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Truth to tell, I've avoided the whole thing. The campy 1970s version left a bad taste in my mouth...I know this one was nothing like that, but nothing I heard about it thrilled me enough to make me look into it and watch the show. Hope you guys got something out of it, though.

That's pretty much how I felt. I couldn't believe they were dredging that up again. Never could get into it. If it was a good series, it's a shame they didn't just change enough to make it stand on it's own, without the baggage of the previous version.


Posts: 4633 | Registered: Dec 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robert Nowall
Member
Member # 2764

 - posted      Profile for Robert Nowall   Email Robert Nowall         Edit/Delete Post 
There's another problem that's infested contemporary television---it used to be confined to books. No one segment, be it a single episode or single book, stands alone. You have to watch it all to understand what's going on. This is hard on the viewer / reader / fan, especially when pieces "up ahead" haven't been released or even filmed / written. This is particularly hard when these things get cancelled and there is no more...

It was something I swore never to do. If I wrote a book, it would stand on its own...if I wrote a sequel, that would also stand on its own. (Not that I've had the chance in paying markets...I did try out an Internet Fan Fiction series along these lines, with limited success.)


Posts: 8809 | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Nicole
Member
Member # 3549

 - posted      Profile for Nicole   Email Nicole         Edit/Delete Post 
I was like 5 years old when the old one showed in my country, so all I know is that my dad told me we watched it together. I understand that the folks who saw it the first time around wouldn't want to see it again.

Robert, I agree that you should be able to read a book (pick up a saga in the middle and still understand it) on its own. But the thing I like about TV series like BSG is the history and the incredible depth of characters that have been explored in 80-90 episodes. You can't do that and still have coherent individual episodes/books.

All this when the show/book saga is good, of course.

What prompted me to start this thread was actually a statment by the creator of BSG about he not having planned too far into the story, about making up stuff (prophecies, for example) and not having a clear idea of how they'd be resolved. Like, the creators of the show didn't know who the Final Five cylon models where until the last minute.

That's scary. Because, as far as I've learned here, you have to have some sort of plan (even if it's revised as you go along). But it makes sense to plot a novel thinking about what happens at the end, even if it's a bit nebulous. You write *towards* somewhere, don't you?


Posts: 89 | Registered: Jul 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robert Nowall
Member
Member # 2764

 - posted      Profile for Robert Nowall   Email Robert Nowall         Edit/Delete Post 
Well, so far, I've written two books without knowing what happens at the end. One I finished---and threw away the first eighteen chapters when it morphed into somebody else's adventure. The other, my last serious attempt at a novel, got up to a hundred thousand words and sits where I stopped because I reached a point where I didn't know what happened next. Yes, it's much better to know where you're going when you start out.

On series and stand-alones---it's not that things don't acquire depth with length. Often they do. But it's the feeling of having to buy or watch all of it that gets me. My time is short; my money is not so plentiful that I want to spend it without regard.

On the other hand, making things stand alone has its own perils. I recall a series of police procedurals by Ed McBain that, I'm told, all stood alone (I only read two or three of them, and they did), but nearly all contained a peculiar explanation of how a character named Meyer Meyer got his name. Was it worth it, each time?


Posts: 8809 | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TaleSpinner
Member
Member # 5638

 - posted      Profile for TaleSpinner   Email TaleSpinner         Edit/Delete Post 
"You write *towards* somewhere, don't you?"

Usually, yes, I do.

But my most recent short story wrote itself, with the characters deciding the ending. "The villain must lose, but this is not a revenge story," they said. "As heroes we'll demonstrate compassion towards the villain, 'cos that's the way we are -- and it means he could return in sequels to annoy us further ..."

I enjoy the adventure of not knowing quite when or where my story will end. I enjoy listening to and learning from my characters. And if God stars in one of my stories, and He tells me the ending, I sure ain't gonna argue with Him ... mind, I'm probably going to Hell anyway, so I might argue for a while just for the, um, hell of it ...


Posts: 1796 | Registered: Jun 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2