Back when I was just starting up my work, I used the heck out of the 13-line post, then send a chapter or two stuff that we have going on in the Feedback forum. That was great, but you were somewhat restricted to commenting on the beginning or near-beginning of the novel. The impression I got (and I could be totally off) was that these were usually one-off things. Usually I did a crit exchange, but I almost never (or perhaps never never) re-exchanged works at later points.

I've been working on my main WIP for well over a year now, and it's grown into quite a little beastie; I passed the magic 100K word count a while back, and a fair amount of the story has been crafted and recrafted over and over... and I'm not really interested in crits on my first 13, the first two chapters, or any small section of the beginning (right this second).

What I'd love to do, however, is work with folks in a similar situation who want to go over the book as a whole (or a large, large portion thereof), with the expectation of a swapped crit and that this would be a long-term thing. I certainly don't expect analysis on 400 pages in a week (nor will I give out such crits... I do have a job).

I'd also propose that this group have a bailout period. For instance, if after reading the first five chapters or so of a WIP, you realize you can't stand it and really are not interested in reading the next 20 chapters or so, you can bail on a book. Alternately, if you realize 10 chapters in that you just don't have time, you can bail also - no shame allowed

Would people be interested in doing that? It's meant to be more involved, and I suspect the unpublished amongst us (such as myself) would be more interested... this is motivation and strategy to get to chapter 50 more than polishing a small section; crits could be at a higher level (chapter as a whole, rather than line by line) due to the volume. We could hash it out if there's interest. Dunno, perhaps live chats among people hearing crit on a book? I could arrange that via various online tools if needs be.

I'd like something a bit more formal where we do regular chapter exchanges. The group size would be limited by necessity; I can only read N chapters per week/two weeks/interval, etc, for some small value of N that has yet to be determined.

Larger groups could work, provided the exchange was circular; person A was reviewed by persons B and C, but not D, E, F, or G... B would be reviewed by C and D, ... and G reviewed by A and B. Each person reviews two others and is reviewed by two (or three, or four, depending on what a reasonable limit is).

The only real rule is that everybody understands the idea is for this to take a while - months, etc.

Your 20K may grow to 40K while the group is operating.

Not sure what the rules should be with regards to what happens when you're out of material, but person X still has 15 more chapters to go.

Incidentally, we can take this over to Groups - I put it in discussion mainly to see if anyone would be interested, and perhaps to get some discussion as to what the goals, rules, etc of such a group should be, since (from what I can tell) this sort of thing is new(ish) here.

There's also a difference between reading the first (unfinished) draft and a third or fourth draft. The critiquer should be looking for different things. In a first (or sometimes second) draft, I'm only interested in plot, pacing and characterization. I'll fix all the fussy little errors in the second or third draft. In a third or fourth draft, I want to know about any of those fussy little grammar or spelling errors, unintended POV shifts, etc. that I don't care about in a first draft. So there might be some guidelines along those lines.

Not all of us would have a synopsis or outline available for a first draft or incomplete work, though. I don't really outline any more. Just make notes. I'm a pantser, what can I say? The last time I did outline, I ignored it completely anyway. The time before that, I made more revisions to the outline than to the novel. It's just not worth it for me.

1. Each member of the LTC should have no more than two works to crit simultaneously.
2. If you have a work to crit, that implies you accept to go through at least 50K words worth of work, at a rate of 10K per week (8k per week? 10K per two weeks?). It is greatly appreciated to go through the entire work, even if your own is not quite as long.
3. Crits are intended to be high level and non-repetitive. "You often use this passive style, such as in sentence A," as opposed to "Sentences A, B, C... ZZ use the passive style; may I suggest the following fixes. You have misspellings on lines N1, N2..." Crits should not be line-by-line first reviews.
4. Things that Critters are on high alert for should be overall stylistic issues, character development issues, plot logic failures/holes, pacing issues, overall feeling.
5. Upon submitting a section for crit, the submitter should identify the section as level 1, 2, or 3. The higher the level, the more refined it is supposed to be. A submission at level 1, for instance, is intended to be more open to "That whole section in the marketplace could be left out - maybe you can send them to the church instead b/c things would play out better." A level 3 submission is less open to radical plot changes, hoping instead for comments more about how the characters come off, whether things seem a little aimless. You know that the characters are going to be in the market, but perhaps you should have less dialogue and more action; perhaps having the protagonist shoplift doesn't seem believable; character B probably wouldn't curse in that situation...
6. Once per month per submitter (perhaps twice?) we'll host a chat where the subject is that submitter's work thus far. The two critters working on the submitter's work discuss what they think of the work so far, overall opinions, ask the author questions they may have about the plot, the background, etc. Suggestions can be made as to what the reader should know at this point, how characters are getting too dark, too light, not believable, etc. (Positive crits are super helpful too
7. The weekly crits you make ought be no more than a page or two of comments regarding the things mentioned above. Think high level, low word count!
8. If your work is at the level where you need many revisions to go back and just fix grammar or spelling issues... you probably shouldn't be doing this sort of crit group. This is intended for works that are well on their way to completion (or are possibly completed already) and want deep, long-term crits.
9. If we finish your WIP, we'll spend the next chat that would ordinarily be focused on your material for the month and have that be focused on "the future." You can make suggestions/hints about where you want the plot to go; your critters can do the same. Get ideas, flesh things out, and have fun.
   

Depending on how things go, how enthusiastic members are, etc, we might have "world creation chats" with each author as an opportunity to have the author describe the world they've created, the rules of scifi/magic, how the speculative bits affect the world at large, politics, history, etc.

I'm all for posting little summaries, then voting for which two (of the three) you'd like to crit... you can give a #1 and #2, ties broken by my trademarked nickel-plated random boolean generator ( coin.flip() ).

quote:

---

If you have a work to crit, that implies you accept to go through at least 50K words worth of work, at a rate of 10K per week (8k per week? 10K per two weeks?). It is greatly appreciated to go through the entire work, even if your own is not quite as long.

---

There is a lot of value in a fast moving critique. But I'm worried about setting a required weekly word limit.

It may scare some people off who would have been valuable participants.

And any group like this has to allow for the fact that there just will be times when life interrupts. That's not a word count that would normally be a problem for me. However, I can see circumstances in which I wouldn't be able to meet it in a given week. And those are precisely the circumstances when I wouldn't want the extra pressure of trying to get the critique done.

But such contingencies might well be temporary and I wouldn't want to see participants forced to quit the group because they had a bad week or two.

quote:

---

Once per month per submitter (perhaps twice?) we'll host a chat where the subject is that submitter's work thus far. The two critters working on the submitter's work discuss what they think of the work so far, overall opinions, ask the author questions they may have about the plot, the background, etc. Suggestions can be made as to what the reader should know at this point, how characters are getting too dark, too light, not believable, etc. (Positive crits are super helpful too

---

It's an interesting idea and could be fun. But if we end up being scattered over a wide range of time zones, it might be a little difficult to find a time that works for everyone. JMO.

With regards to the feedback:

• For pacing, I think Meredith is right that 10000/week is too fast to allow for the little things in life that creep up and cause delay. Would 10K per two weeks be too intense? Could we do 10K/3weeks, or 10K/month? I don't want to drop it too far; the idea is to get criticism on a whole lot of work, and at the rate of 10K/month, we won't be anywhere near done with some of the longer works until about a year in, and I was hoping for a little faster pace than that.
• With regards to how difficult time zones will make chatting... I'm on the east coast of the USA. The interested-ish parties so far appear to be Meredith, Teraen, and andersonmcdonald... according to your Hatrack profiles, Meredith is in CA, andersonmcdonald in Missouri (I'm assuming central time?), and Teraen... has gobbldygook on there. I've arranged fantasy football drafts that were cross-country (plus one in Japan, actually, but he was fine with waking up at 2AM). Finding common holes in schedules turns ugly fast, but with 4 it might work. I was thinking every other weekend or so, but we can shoot around emails to do that.
• I'm pro partnering, though with 4 people... we're almost all partners. I'm against just "voluntary" critting of submitted stuff b/c my experience with that in the past is that it drifts off quickly.
  

You guys want to give it a go?

quote:

---

With regards to the feedback:

For pacing, I think Meredith is right that 10000/week is too fast to allow for the little things in life that creep up and cause delay. Would 10K per two weeks be too intense? Could we do 10K/3weeks, or 10K/month? I don't want to drop it too far; the idea is to get criticism on a whole lot of work, and at the rate of 10K/month, we won't be anywhere near done with some of the longer works until about a year in, and I was hoping for a little faster pace than that.

---

I'd vote for 5K a week (or 10K/two weeks to start). The two week idea might actually give a little more flexibility to work around stuff that comes up. I think it's best to start a little slow. We can always increase the pace later if it works out that way.

quote:

---

You guys want to give it a go?

---

1) Novel Critique Group
2) Kick in the Butt Group
3) Actually Get Around to Finishing that Manuscript Group
4) Future Published Novelists Anonymous
5) Don't Even Think About Posting Here if You Aren't Interested in Getting Published Group
6) Manuscript Revision Group