Hatrack River Writers Workshop   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Writers Workshop » Forums » Open Discussions About Writing » A publishing thought

   
Author Topic: A publishing thought
rstegman
Member
Member # 3233

 - posted      Profile for rstegman   Email rstegman         Edit/Delete Post 
ON PUBLISHING OR PERISHING
I am returning this otherwise good typing paper to you because someone has printed gibberish all over it and put your name at the top.
-- English Professor, Ohio University

Posts: 1008 | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
wetwilly
Member
Member # 1818

 - posted      Profile for wetwilly   Email wetwilly         Edit/Delete Post 
Brilliant.
Posts: 1528 | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Reziac
Member
Member # 9345

 - posted      Profile for Reziac   Email Reziac         Edit/Delete Post 
Hunting for an attribution led me to a collection of similar sayings, where I see also my favorite:

Writing is easy: All you do is sit staring at a blank sheet of paper until drops of blood form on your forehead. --Gene Fowler


(For those interested, http://www.jimbrumm.com/Coaching_for_Writers.html about which I know nothing else.)

Posts: 782 | Registered: Dec 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
extrinsic
Member
Member # 8019

 - posted      Profile for extrinsic   Email extrinsic         Edit/Delete Post 
I remain most fond of the proverbial Chinese economic journal rejection letter. The letter has become so much part of publishing culture that its actual source genesis is unknown. It has become publishing culture lore. One feature that recommends it to folklore is that the source is unnamed in a friend of a friend stranger type genesis. A delightful piece of publishing lore for which I hope I will never see regarding works of my own.

"We have read your manuscript with boundless delight. If we were to publish your paper, it would be impossible for us to publish any work of lower standard. And as it is unthinkable that in the next thousand years we shall see its equal, we are, to our regret, compelled to return your divine composition, and to beg you a thousand times to overlook our short sight and timidity."

This next one is new to me and deeply meaningful for writers in general.

"A work of art that one has to explain fails in so far, I suppose, of its mission." Henry James commenting on his novel The Awkward Age, 1898.

How often do writers explain the meaning of their works, meaning that ought be in the narrative itself and not as a corollary, secondary commentary? James' comment above is exquisite for its insight and tertiary (third) degree of explanation commentary.

Posts: 6037 | Registered: Jun 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
rstegman
Member
Member # 3233

 - posted      Profile for rstegman   Email rstegman         Edit/Delete Post 
I am a true artist of the first caliber.

I am now working on a special artistic series of manuscripts
"Man's inhumanity to words"

My previous series was
"Man's inhumanity to paper."

I hope to start my next series soon,
"Man's inhumanity to monitor pixels."

Posts: 1008 | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2