----------
Penetration is an act of conquest, a male's victory dance at the end of a long struggle. It is no surprise that prehistoric armies used sodomy as well as the sword to vanquish their foes.
Women are nothing like men. Those who claim otherwise are blinded by jealousy or a false sense of entitlement, or deceived by the legions of slavish males in their company. City life may blur the lines, but make no mistake; the conqueror is always on the march.
Throughout history female-dominated societies have always died out, falling victim to stagnation or invading armies. It is not for lack of means. In modern times women can serve in any capacity, lawyers or politicians or ruthless businesswomen; when called to war they can fight and die and even command, if the men would take their orders. But through it all they remain cogs in the wheel, never to drive the machine or plot its course, for the same reasons their female utopias failed. Women lack the will to conquer.
History is written by the victors, the substance of thought and human memory determined by the conquerors. If, as scholars say, evolution is a battlefield of the mind, a brute struggle for the transmission of ideas, then women will never win the war.
-------------
I should add that this statement represents a dilemma in the story (and certain characters' views) not my opinion.
[This message has been edited by mujarrah (edited January 15, 2005).]
You've got the whole novel to illustrate and prove your theme - you don't need to state it up front.
[This message has been edited by Beth (edited January 15, 2005).]
I have 5 chapters, about 160 pages. I would love to get feedback any portion of it. I'm new to this forum. How does that process work?
Unless, of course, your story has a device similar to what OSC used in Pastwatch to view the past; your character has special knowledge of this fact; or if there just happens to be cave paintings, hieroglyphics, or whatever that show these things happening to the subdued. (Whether these things actually occurred in real history, I don't know -- and maybe I don't want to know -- just making an observation.)
It's a nitpicky thing, sure, but perhaps using another word (or two) would be appropriate. Such as: "earliest known armies" or some other thing that works for you.
If you are looking for a reader for the rest, I'd be glad to give it a go. It's interesting -- makes me wonder if it's a diary, speech, or written excerpt done by your main character.
About how it works: I'd recommend jumping right in and critiquing other's works before expecting any volunteers to critique yours. This gives the impression that you're going to be an active participant on the boards, willing to learn and help others with their stories, and not disappear after you've been helped. Critiquing (even 13 lines, for some of us) takes time and effort and some here won't give you any their time if you aren't willing to give your time to the other members in return. Not everyone feels this way, but some do.
So, poke your head into a few topics and tell people what you think. Get involved. Visit the other boards and participate in the discussions.
There's more to it, but you can get a good feel for how it all works by reading through the topics.
Hope this helps.
A "preface" is supposed to be your own ideas. If the text here is not your opinion, then don't call it a preface. You could make it a prologue, with a fictional header saying who wrote it and when. That would solve a lot of the problems noted already.
I'll take a look at this "artificial document" prologue after you add the appropriate headers.
As for getting a novel critted, the first step is usually to post the opening of the first chapter and look for readers for that chapter. Then anyone can volunteer to keep reading. Prologues often present a special case, if the prologue is in a narrative style similar to the rest of the book you can submit it like a first chapter with the understanding that it is a prologue.
In this case, you should probably post the opening somewhere else and have this be a bonus assignment for people that want to critique the whole thing.