Tell me what you guys think, the title is called A Trade For Peace and this is just an excerpt.
I busted through the door and was surprised to find myself being lunged at by a knife, nearly slicing into my neck, I responded to this threat by kicking my attacker directly in the groin and punched him as hard as I could, I could hear every knuckle of my tightly clenched fist crack. I then resumed with my mission and looked for these so-called “important documents” which were supposed to be in a combination safe, according to the poorly put together mission briefing. I swear, the higher-ranking officers got stupider the more authority they had. It was even worse, for my squad, who was just now catching up to me or at least I hoped so, as I had heard uneven footsteps noises approaching my current position. I slammed the office’s door as fast as I could with the very same leg that had just pummeled
[This message has been edited by Kathleen Dalton Woodbury (edited January 20, 2006).]
I think it's because in first-person I expect to see more thoughts, less action. I would be more forgiving of a lack of information in third-person because people's thoughts and motives are often shown through their actions.
That's my analysis anyway.
Just tell us up front: "MC, a CIA covert operative, was infiltrating a Chinese army base, looking for the secret plans to the Omega Weapon." Or whatever it is.
All of the commas in this first sentence should be something else: "I busted through the door and was surprised to find myself being lunged at by a knife, nearly slicing into my neck, I responded to this threat by kicking my attacker directly in the groin and punched him as hard as I could, I could hear every knuckle of my tightly clenched fist crack."
Here's one way to fix them: "I busted through the door and was surprised to find myself being lunged at by a knife nearly slicing into my neck. I responded to this threat by kicking my attacker directly in the groin and punched him as hard as I could; I could hear every knuckle of my tightly-clenched fist crack."
There was some wording awkwardness in this sentence, too. "Punched" should be "punching" to match the verb tense of "kicking," and the opening might be better if it was "...and was surprised to find a man with a knife lunging toward my throat." Or something.
You said this is an excerpt. It would help me to gauge where this excerpt falls in the story. I am assuming it's not your opener... it seems like it's a mid-chapter bit. I wouldn't like this as an opener.
I'm also not your reader-demographic as I abhore blow-by-blow fight scenes. I don't need to know the exact details of the fight. I find it boring. Tell me the emotional state the fighters are in, then you'll have my interest.
You are conveying action immediately, but without context for the violence and brutality of the action, the introduction is disorienting. A pet peeve - I don't like the word "stupider."
Other than this, I think the initial description of action is excellent. The conjunction "I then" is out of context, though. The protagonist is a man of action in the first sentence, but then becomes thoughtful and deliberative - it doesn't work well for me.
I would recommend finding a way to convey the context for the man's actions, and then feel free to let him loose to do what needs to be done.
Finally, I have the most difficulty of all with the 13-line rule. If I could read a little more of your story I would probably find that context that I am looking for. I think it is next to impossible to establish a firm frame of reference in just 13 lines.
Good luck with this adventure! I will be happy to provide a critique of a longer segment of your story.
Pax,
PMoore
The action description is good but your execution needs to be polished up a little more.
I would be more hooked if I knew something about the setting and the character's feelings.