Brian
http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2001/07/myers.htm
But maybe that's the anamoly.
Just reading some of the examples made me want to pick up OSC, or Steven King and read them just to get that awful imagry out of my head.
The sad part, those passages were so earnest that I couldn't even laugh at them.
quote:This sentance/passage really does work, despite criticism. A "tight-wound" kid unfurls during his life till we get to the "spooled-out" year. It makes sense and is rather evocative.
In the long unfurling of his life, from tight-wound kid hustler in a wool suit riding the train out of Cheyenne to geriatric limper in this spooled-out year, Mero had kicked down thoughts of the place where he began, a so-called ranch on strange ground at the south hinge of the Big Horns.
But the larger criticism is probably valid. Our contemporary critical community is rather facist (in the whole national socialist "writer's union" sense of the word).
I may not be on the fast track to writing award winning novels but I have read and loved literature all my life. I just don't see much being offered today that compares with the writer's of a generation ago. I have been racking my brain trying to think of a writer or a book that I read recently that would be a good example of what I think is literature(not counting SF/F) I have been on an Iris Murdoch and P.D. Wodehouse binge this last year so I can't think of many. The only one I can think of is The Living, by Annie Dillard.
[This message has been edited by Tanglier (edited January 24, 2003).]
I didn't say that his complaint is without merit, only that in this particular instance it was he, rather than the passage, being deliberately obtuse. Frankly, I have a bit of a problem with "so-called ranch" and not much else (just in this passage, I mean). And I don't really go for current "literary" work (do I even need to say that?). I mean, the passage makes sense, but it really isn't brilliant or anything. It just says that this guy, Mero, has had a long life and changed a lot, but has always avoided thinking about his point of origin. Hardly an earthshaking insight. Nothing like...what's the current OSC quote? Here we go, "It is the downfall of evil, that it never sees far enough ahead." Okay, not extraordinarily profound. My favorite is, "the power to destroy is the only power that matters...because if you cannot kill then you will always be at the mercy of those that can, and nothing and no one will ever save you."
Writing can never be more "brilliant" than what it actually says. The problem with "literary" literature isn't that it doesn't make any sense (though too often it doesn't) but that it doesn't say anything that isn't either trivial or false.