quote:
A good exercise is to highlight all the weak verbs in a page/chapter of your work. All the wases, ises, ams, weres, even the seems. Also, you can set Microsoft Word to check your percentage of passive sentences by going to Tools, Options, Grammar and Spelling, and check the show Readability Statistics (or something like that). I'm not sure what a decent percentage is, but you can monitor yourself over time to see if you improve your stats. Or you can copy excerpts of writers you admire and see how they did. (I just thought of that. I gotta try it. )
I do this with my writing but in WP. In WP hit the grammar check under tools then go to options and choose readability. You can compare to a number of documents.
I thought it might be fun to see what people come up with.
I did Hemingway first: (in Word Perfect)
Flesch-Kincaid grade level
Mine 5.2
Hemingway 4
Passive voice
Mine 2%
Hemingway 3%
Sentence Complexity (100=very complex)
Mine 24
Hemingway 14
Vocabulary Complexity (100=very complex)
Mine 8
Hemingway 5
Gettysburg Address:
Flesch-Kincaid grade level
Mine 5.2
Gettysburg Address 12.9
Passive voice
Mine 2%
Gettysburg Address 9%
Sentence Complexity (100=very complex)
Mine 24
Gettysburg Address 75
Vocabulary Complexity (100=very complex)
Mine 8
Gettysburg Address 15
1040EZ Tax instructions:
Flesch-Kincaid grade level
Mine 5.2
1040EZ Tax instructions 10.5
Passive voice
Mine 2%
1040EZ Tax instructions 24%
Sentence Complexity (100=very complex)
Mine 24
1040EZ Tax instructions 27
Vocabulary Complexity (100=very complex)
Mine 8
1040EZ Tax instructions 42
Interesting--so what do you come up with?
Shawn
Shawn
That said, the best thing this exercise can do is to show you how your sentence structure, grammar, vocabulary compare to other fiction writers.
Someone should try comparing Hemingway to Faulkner!!
The high passivity rate for tax instructions is accurate, because the doer (the taxpayer) is not important in this case. It's the doing (the instructions) that is the issue. That may sound cynical, but for the purposes of the active/passive discussion it's absolutely on mark. It's a proper use of passive voice.
With Flesch Reading Scores, according to Word, "The higher the score, the easier to understand the document." Word suggests aiming for a score of 60-70. It advises a grade level of 7-8. All it measures, though, are the average number of syllables per word and the average number of words per sentence. It doesn't evaluate content. If you put gobbledy-gook into a document you could score high or low depending on the configuration of the gobbledy-gook.
Out of curiosity, I ran four of Infyrno's postings and he averaged 5% passivity (though he had a 16%, 4%, and two 0%s; as a non-statistician, I'm not sure how to look at that since there are such extremes. Maybe drop high and low and end up with 2%?), 74.2 Flesch Ease Score, and 6.9 grade level. My novel presently runs 2.1 passivity, 71.0 Flesch Ease Score, and 6.7 grade level.
Balthasar is right. Any document with a lot of dialogue, for instance, would score differently than one with a lot of narrative.
These are not infallible tools, though they have their uses.
Passive voice
Mine: 4
Hemingway: 3
Sentence Complexity
Mine: 24
Hemingway: 14
Vocabulary complexity
mine: 7
Hemingway: 5
So, does this mean I need to work on the passive voice some more?
(Although we can all use some work on passive voice -- or at least be on our guard to keep it in check.)
But now that I come to think about it, this would be a great plot for a story. Get enough of these moronic expert system type software controls in use at the same time, spread through all aspects of a society, and you could get an impressive general collapse.
What fun!
Shawn
That's either a sign of mental illness or brilliant creativity! Out of respect, I'll assert that it's the latter.
Passive Sentences: 0%
Flesch Reading Ease: 51.3
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 9.1