So being careful and inserting spoiler warning where necessary, let's talk some about endings. What makes (or break) an ending for you? What authors do particularly well/poorly with endings?
It's not as objectionable when the story has a sequel (or series of sequels), but I still prefer some closure to the main plot of the story.
If you guys are starting a fight, I'm in
Stephen King generally has very good endings, I think. I'm thinking of "The Dark Half" here, and of course "Shawshank Redemption." He tends to make it feel like the story is really finished, and that big ending that the whole story was building up to is actually big, instead of fizzling out like a lot of endings do.
I think one of the best endings ever was "The Lost Boys" by OSC. I can't really say anything about it without spoiling it, but it was a shocker. Actually, the book didn't really build up to it much at all, and then BAM, there's a super shocking ending out of nowhere.
With Lost Boys, you don't see the ending coming, but it doesn't come out of nowhere. It comes out of the unknown in the story. You saw the symptoms, speculated about the causes, but there was this one cause beneath everything...and in the interest of not spoiling anything I won't say what it was.
The key to a good surprise ending (any ending, really) is that it makes sense of the entire story up to that point. Suddenly you see why everything happened. The unknown that before only showed its fin is revealed to be either a shark, dolphin, or little kid with a bit of foam rubber on his head
Nevertheless, it is my least favorite of all his books, and I say this because of what happened at the end. He drew me through the entire thing, even with his simless descriptions of his own family life (Yes, it was kind of obvious. )
BUT....SPOILER ALERT
I was disappointed because the ending did not have to happen if the idiot parents had paid any attention! I was therefore quite dissatisfied.
SPOILER ALERT: Fford
And then there's a series I really love, like the Jasper Fforde books-- I finished the second one, and *drop* at the end: we don't know anything beyond the fact that the Earth still exists, and none of the things I felt tense about were really resolved. The central volume of almost every trilogy... our heroes successfully manage to run away. argh.
On the other hand, the ending of _Lost in a Good Book_ convinced me to buy the next book in hardback. Maybe that's success too...
IF YOU'VE NEVER SEEN THE MOVIE, READ NO FURTHER, AND WATCH THE MOVIE. SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER!
Ignore the psychosymbolic (you like that word? I think I made it up) killing of the character's other self, which is the actual end of the story. The very last moment of the movie, as they're standing in the window watching the skyscraper burn, and Edward Norton looks over at that chick and says, very calmly, "You met me at a wierd time of my life..."
That one line made the whole ending. For anyone who hasn't seen the movie but read past my warning, you have to see the movie to get it. That was a super-awesome ending line, though.
I hope that made sense. Read the book to see what I mean. I found it extremely helpful in figuring out what kind of ending a story ought to be heading for.