Back in July a person in a short-lived writing group read a first-person piece set in modern times. I saw nothing wrong with using contractions in the narrative. I only eliminated thier use, for example, in pieces set in the middle ages. But the reader questioned it. So I started taking them out. But now I'm starting to wonder. I see them in published work. It would not sound natural without it. In fact it gives the narrator the wrong voice.
Even in third person narration, at least limited third person, which is a series of obersavations and thoughts out of the mind & senses of the POV character, contractions seem to make sense, depending on the character.
So, what say ye about contractions in narration?
[This message has been edited by ChrisOwens (edited November 26, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by ChrisOwens (edited November 26, 2004).]
While I don't think the elimination of contractions is a good idea in dialogue or thoughts, they can look a little sloppy in prose.
Also, it is possible to have too much of a good thing. Over use of contractions can make a writer appear lazy.
However, in general, I still adore contractions.
Use them when they feel right. Don't use them when they don't feel right.
That's the kind of intuitive stuff that makes writing an art instead of a formula.
quote:
Even in third person narration, at least limited third person, which is a series of obersavations and thoughts out of the mind & senses of the POV character, contractions seem to make sense, depending on the character.
Be careful not to confuse POV with the narrative voice. In third limited the voice of the narrator is not generally the voice of the POV character. That's what First Person POV is for.
In third limited you're not really giving a series of observations and thoughts out of the POV character's mind and senses, so much as you are giving your narrator's observations of those things. So the narrative voice SHOULD remain consistent throughout the story, and through all your POV shifts.
As far as contractions, consider the voice of your narrator. Consider Card's Alvin Maker series. The narrator has a very distinctive voice in those books--a unique voice that actually surfaces and speaks directly to you at times, asserting himself (Oh, there I go being sexist again ) as ALMOST a character. But he has his own voice. What I'm trying to say, is that if your narrator would use contractions (and again, don't confuse narrator with POV character) than use them.
[This message has been edited by Magic Beans (edited November 27, 2004).]
If you want to affect a formal tone in your piece, do not use contractions. You do not have to use big words to be formal. You must, however, write in a formal way.
But if you want to affect an informal tone, then use contractions. It's the best and easiest way to make a piece's tone informal.