I write mostly soft science fiction and fantasy but to me they all seem to be essentially literary stories in the future or past.
Jayson Merryfield
A slower, and perhaps cleaner, way would be to have the story be about how the speculative element affects the characters. That also tends to make the speculative element indispensible.
Example:
1)What if disease got so rampant and uncontrollable on earth that almost everyone left? Ho hum, the earth would be depopulated. Big deal. Better fortune in space colonies (unless we hadn't actually found any yet. Oo. Cool.)
2)What would happen to somebody that made a living by doing things exclusively tied to Earth, if disease got so rampant and uncontrollable that almost everyone left?
or
3)What if someone wanted to leave earth with everyone else when disease got so rampant that it couldn't be controlled, but that person couldn't leave because he/she owed money to someone, and couldn't legally get off planet until they paid up?
Or you might try stripping away all the speculative fiction elements and see what you're left with, and try to see how you could insert them back in . . .
By the way, I'm claiming all the ideas in this post.
So, what if we could make robots that could think and converse--and not have Frankenstein complexes? Answer--Asimov's robot stories.
What if you could live for centuries? Answer--Time Enough for Love, Heinlein.
What if we trained kids to fight in space ships using war games? Answer--Ender's Game, OSC.
By answering the question with a story, the speculative element is central to the story. If the story answers the question honestly, the speculative element cannot be removed from it, so it's definitely SF according to Campbell's definition.
On the other hand, if the story is a who-dunnit, a romance or a horror story, and the speculative element just adds spice, then it can be removed, so it's weaker as SF. Whether that makes it literary or not is another matter.
Cheers,
Pat
If you'd rather tell a story about a man's struggle against evil, you could set that on Wall Street or ancient Egypt or the suburbs of Dublin. But if you think it would be most interesting to play that struggle out in a different environment, well you might have Harry Potter.
I guess what I'm saying is - write what's in your heart. If the spec stuff isn't all that interesting to you, don't stress yourself by writing that far out into the genre. A good story will shine no matter how much of a speculative element is there. Just be warned of the spec fiction reader - they expect something strange about what they read. If you don't deliver, they'll put you down or get angry.
That's why there's a certain amount of recycling of the "what if?" parts in SF---every writer can put his own spin on the question. As I said in another thread, more or less, Asimov certainly didn't invent robots, he just imparted his own spin on them.
And a certain amount of "what if?" is present in nearly every story. Say you're writing a Civil War story. It's "what if" the politicians did this? "What if" these soldiers got into a battle? "What if" Lee surrendered? They're not affected because such events happened---the characters in the story, and maybe even the reader, won't necessarily know that something really happened.
The story I'm thinking about right now is a character story per OSC's MICE quotient. It just seems the change in character could be told in any genre; that's what I'm getting hung up on. I'll have to devise a few more ways to show how the speculative element affects the character so that he's not the same character as if that element weren't in the story.
You could argue that the MCs in my fantasy WIP could fall in love in any genre--historical fiction, literary fiction, etc. And to a certain extent they could--the world that I created is an allegory for our own, but tweaked. The thing is, though, the set up, the things that make them change, the way they respond to them--none of those would be possible without the world I created.
This problem is worth considering and analyzing, but it's possible to think yourself into paralysis.
(As I recall, "speculative fiction" was a term promoted as an alternate to "science fiction" while preserving the "SF" initials. Never caught on...I hadn't seen it much lately till this thread...certainly I never cared for it much.)
((Just how speculative is Harry Potter? Regrets, but I still haven't read past Volume One...which struck me (and strikes me) as a Boy-at-British-Public-School story played out with fantastic elements used for color. If you stripped them away there wouldn't be a story, so I guess the fantastic element is vital...but is that speculative?))