Which one is correct:
A
Judy walked down the street. She saw Joey.
----->"Hi, Joey," she said.
B
Judy walked down the street. She saw Joey.
"Hi, Joey," she said.
Note from Kathleen: Edited to show what she was asking.
[This message has been edited by Kathleen Dalton Woodbury (edited June 24, 2008).]
[This message has been edited by extrinsic (edited June 24, 2008).]
In the examples you show above, wrenbird, you don't need to start a new paragraph unless someone other than Judy (the person referred to in the first two sentences) is the speaker. The dialogue should go with the person speaking it.
Any other indenting is not correct in standard prose.
---->On a sunny day in May, Judy was walking down the street. She saw Joey coming towards her.
"Hi, Joey," she said.
---->"Hi, Judy," Joey said.
---->"What are you doing today?" Judy asked.
---->Joey shrugged. "Oh, nothing."
What about that last part, where I have words before the dialogue?
quote:
¶On a sunny day in May, Judy was walking down the street. She saw Joey coming towards her.
"Hi, Joey," she said.
¶"Hi, Judy," Joey said.
¶"What are you doing today?" Judy asked.
¶Joey shrugged. "Oh, nothing."
A paragraph break for the last line is correct because Joey is a different character from Judy, different actor, action, and speaker. I'm fond of the pilcrow symbol to denote paragraph breaks. "Joey shrugged" in the last line is a gestural dialogue tag, what some writers call a beat. I prefer to place those within the dialogue whenever possible rather than before. "Oh" is a discourse marker. Setting discourse markers off from the main sentence with gestural dialogue tags might strenghten the meaning of the emotion intended and more closely represent the sequence of actions. ["Oh." Joey shrugged. "Nothing."]
¶On a sunny day in May, Judy was walking down the street. She saw Joey coming towards her.
¶"Hi, Joey," she said.
I prefer that because there is a reference to Joey coming toward her in the narrative. I prefer not to see action by a second character in a paragraph with dialogue. If there is, it's better to use a new paragraph.
I don't agree on putting the Oh before the shrug, but that's a stylistic issue. I think it reads more smoothly with the shrug first. Either would be correct. It's just a matter of personal style.
[This message has been edited by JeanneT (edited June 25, 2008).]
It's only partly a stylistic issue. Putting "Oh" before the shrug implies he said "Oh" before shrugging.
---->"Oh, just shrugging," Joey said.
;-)
Pat
Edited to add that it gave a blank space here, too, so I'm going to post it with spaces in between the symbols. If you want it to insert a blank space, you have to move them all next to each other.
& n b s p ;
[This message has been edited by Kathleen Dalton Woodbury (edited June 26, 2008).]
I have a clip file of the character entities I use most often so I don't have to visit w3schools to look them up.
[This message has been edited by extrinsic (edited June 26, 2008).]
quote:
It's only partly a stylistic issue. Putting "Oh" before the shrug implies he said "Oh" before shrugging.
Actually that's not quite correct. The shrugging would indicate simultaneous action.
["Oh." Joey shrugged. "Nothing."]
so it was "shrugged" not "shrugging."
And the period after "shrugged" makes it an action tag, not a saidism (replacement word for "said").
[This message has been edited by JeanneT (edited June 28, 2008).]