Also, keep in mind that folks grew up faster back then, they had too. The Wild West was full of Indians, wars, diseases, pestilence, etc...So that meant they often died young, too, but not before starting a family, keeping a farm or ranch, mining for gold, running cattle, and so forth.
Subjects like this can be touchy to some, but then again there are many subjects that many have strong objections to. I would recomend telling your story as best you can. There will always be nay-sayers
I am trying to recall the movie that was even more modern then settling days in which the MC was about twelve or thirteen and was in love with an older boy. In fact they loved each other for a while before he fell for the older sister, and was then killed in a tractor accident.
That is the movie with a young Reece Witherspoon. It had a familiar situation as the one you described and it was pretty well recieved. I would just keep any potential love scenes at the same rating as the age of the character as a general rule regarding this subject.
On topic, I wouldn't consider the guy a preditor for the reasons others have given, but if your worried that others might find it icky, you could never give their actual ages and leave it up to the reader to decide.
I think it depends on the culture you're setting your story in, and who your characters are within that culture. Have a 21st century American schoolteacher get together with a kid that young and you have trouble. Have a medieval monarch make a dynastic union with a kid that young and you're probably just fine.
The example you cited seems okay to me.
Provided you're making the setting rich and accurate, there should be no issues with readers feeling this is out of place. unless you have the love interest girl doing very young girl things and not in a place in society that would make it make sense for her to have a love interest (for instance, if she's still playing with dolls and other kids.) I would expect a person in a fictional society who is of an age old enough to be considered a "love interest" to be contributing in some sizable way to society, through work at home or outside the home, contributions to conversations (as is appropriate for his/her social standing and station) and otherwise acting not like a giggling 14 year old of today who is worried about her hair style, texting on her phone, and still reliant upon her parents for transportation, money, food, etc.
If you're still worried about modern sensibilities, you could make sure to show other marriages according to the 'norm' that IB described (30-40 yr old man/14 yr old girl). Your main character would look virtuous in comparison. Heck, her parents might even object to him because he's so young, and for good reason. How will they live? etc.
quote:
Heck, her parents might even object to him because he's so young, and for good reason. How will they live?
What a profound observation. You hit the nail on the head here, good job!
When I hung out in an Internet Fan Fiction community, there was a burning debate over a story about a character being raped. Seemed to me (and this was my opinion on the debate, not on the story or the notion) that the critics largely confused writing about a rape with rape itself. This debate went on, and on, and on, and on...and I think it discouraged the guy from every doing another fanfic.
Probably if you have a character who's of age having a relationship with a character who's under age, certain groups will see you condoning such activity, even promoting it, no matter what circumstances or cultural factors are involved...
quote:
Probably if you have a character who's of age having a relationship with a character who's under age, certain groups will see you condoning such activity, even promoting it, no matter what circumstances or cultural factors are involved...
Robert has a point, but...you can't write for those other groups. It's a form of self-censorship. We wouldn't have Lolita if a certain writer was afraid of what others would say.
And it doesn't sound like this would be any kind of Lolita, based on the time and the surroundings.
Besides, if Twilight, which (IMO) is all kinds of twisted subtext can be embraced by the very gender it belittles (again, IMO; I don't want to start an argument--which, I guess, is really a passive-aggressive way of starting an argument...where was I?) then you can definitely write about "young love" in the wild west.
I just hope it stars a young Jim West, before he met up with Artemis.
I could have cited other examples---Harry Potter seen as anti-Christian and pro-black-magic---the "Lolita" angle to, well, Lolita or, say, the Anne Rice vampire books---an argument about rape in a Poul Anderson book---the precise nature of the relationship between Batman and Robin. As Jesus said about the leper, "There's no pleasing some people!"
quote:
Probably if you have a character who's of age having a relationship with a character who's under age, certain groups will see you condoning such activity, even promoting it, no matter what circumstances or cultural factors are involved...
Theres no way to get away from that though. Most of those people are going to read moral offenses into almost everything. Most people realize that things were different in the past...though of course, most still believe that things "improved" and people became more "civilized" when we decided that people don't get romantic or sexual impulses till they turn 18, despite how ridicules that is...but the ones who are still going to care, are going to find something to get bent out of shape about. But especially amongst people who'd read speculative fiction at all, I dont think those folks are a large enough segment to be too concerned with.
Harry Potter is a great example. Even though it isn't even written like fantasy and even though the magic is mostly window-dressing that we don't even get many details about the workings or origin of, because it involves children at a magic school some groups freak out and say its trying to turn kids into witches. Even though almost any other fantasy novel is actually going to have a lot more information and detail about the nature of magic (in that story) than Harry Potter does.