“What on earth is that?” Miner asked, “and how do we...?” his question was cut short by an unexpected attack.
So the question involves the usage of the question mark in the midst of a piece of dialog that is broken up by attribution. If it were a statement instead of a question, we would use a comma, but is the question mark appropriate in such a situation?
Then there is the second part of the character's sentence, "and how do we...?". If he was interrupted and didn't complete his sentence, the elipses (sp?) are appropriate, but what about the question mark at the end--after all he was asking a question when he was interrupted.
I guess what I'm getting down to, is how would you punctuate that bit of dialog appropriately?
Plus, I don't believe you can put anything beyond an ellipsis because by its very nature its a trail off...
Axe
You are interrupting the sentence to add the dialog tag, so the dialog tag should be surrounded by commas. Don't end ellipses in a question mark, and capitalize his since it starts a new sentence.
“What on earth is that,” Miner asked, “and how do we....” His question was cut short by an unexpected attack.
But stylistically, I would cut the Minor asked out all together. It is not needed.
“What on earth is that, and how do we...” Minor's question was cut short by an unexpected attack.
That is my opinion. Maybe someone better with grammar could weigh in (philocinemas).
quote:
What on earth is that?” Miner asked, “and how do we...?” his question was cut short by an unexpected attack.
The first question mark is correct IF that is intended to be a complete stop. In other words, if you didn't put the dialog tag there, you would have written:
"What on earth is that? And how do we . . ."
If you would have written:
"What on earht his that and how do we . . ."
Then use commas.
The second question mark is out on two counts. You wouldn't end elipses with a question mark. And if he's truly been interrupted, not just trailed off without finishing, you use a double dash, --, not elipses.
"What's out-" The window exploded showering glass...
... = a tail-off. This is good for questions left unfinished.
"Do you think he will...?"
"Yes, he'll survive, Mr. Smith. No thanks to you."
[This message has been edited by skadder (edited October 09, 2010).]
"What on earth is that?" Miner asked. "And how do we -"
Or:
"What on earth is that," Miner asked, "and how do we -"
I prefer the former because the latter has no question marks and therefore might be confusing as to whether it is intended as a question.
[This message has been edited by JenniferHicks (edited October 09, 2010).]
.[This message has been edited by Crystal Stevens (edited October 09, 2010).]
Crystal, you're probably seeing newspapers that have gotten rid of most of their copy desks. Management in many places has decided that in order to cut costs, copy editors should be among the first staffers to go. Why? Because when we do our jobs right, we're invisible, which results in the impression that we're not needed. So staff cuts are made, the copy editors who are left have time for only a cursory edit on most stories and mistakes slip through.
To indicate cut off dialogue rather than trailing-off dialogue, you use an em-dash, which in manuscript format is usually indicated by two hyphens, like--
(Since keyboards don't have an actual dash character, a double hyphen is used for the em-dash, and a single hyphen is used for the en-dash. Both dashes are longer than a hyphen when typeset.)