This is topic A publishing thought in forum Open Discussions About Writing at Hatrack River Writers Workshop.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.hatrack.com/ubb/writers/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=007774

Posted by rstegman (Member # 3233) on :
 
ON PUBLISHING OR PERISHING
I am returning this otherwise good typing paper to you because someone has printed gibberish all over it and put your name at the top.
-- English Professor, Ohio University
 
Posted by wetwilly (Member # 1818) on :
 
Brilliant.
 
Posted by Reziac (Member # 9345) on :
 
Hunting for an attribution led me to a collection of similar sayings, where I see also my favorite:

Writing is easy: All you do is sit staring at a blank sheet of paper until drops of blood form on your forehead. --Gene Fowler


(For those interested, http://www.jimbrumm.com/Coaching_for_Writers.html about which I know nothing else.)
 
Posted by extrinsic (Member # 8019) on :
 
I remain most fond of the proverbial Chinese economic journal rejection letter. The letter has become so much part of publishing culture that its actual source genesis is unknown. It has become publishing culture lore. One feature that recommends it to folklore is that the source is unnamed in a friend of a friend stranger type genesis. A delightful piece of publishing lore for which I hope I will never see regarding works of my own.

"We have read your manuscript with boundless delight. If we were to publish your paper, it would be impossible for us to publish any work of lower standard. And as it is unthinkable that in the next thousand years we shall see its equal, we are, to our regret, compelled to return your divine composition, and to beg you a thousand times to overlook our short sight and timidity."

This next one is new to me and deeply meaningful for writers in general.

"A work of art that one has to explain fails in so far, I suppose, of its mission." Henry James commenting on his novel The Awkward Age, 1898.

How often do writers explain the meaning of their works, meaning that ought be in the narrative itself and not as a corollary, secondary commentary? James' comment above is exquisite for its insight and tertiary (third) degree of explanation commentary.
 
Posted by rstegman (Member # 3233) on :
 
I am a true artist of the first caliber.

I am now working on a special artistic series of manuscripts
"Man's inhumanity to words"

My previous series was
"Man's inhumanity to paper."

I hope to start my next series soon,
"Man's inhumanity to monitor pixels."
 


Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2