I'm wondering about electronic file mechanics. My past (limited) experience is face-to-face, paper-pencil, so this is new to me.
In the absence of stated preference from the author, what's the consensus on how to reply? I've tended to use "Comments" in Word because it's easy to do and easy to see, but I realize that not everyone has Word. So if I get a txt or rtf, I'll do it straight in the text (but then you need to bold or bracket or something to make it stand out). And frankly, if I'm the author, then anything the crit-er does is jim-dandy with me.
And do folks prefer the overall comments to be added to the end of the story, or included in the email? Again, I'm willing to do what the author prefers if they say it (well, within reason...).
Or does it even matter to anyone on the thought that "something is good, and it doesn't matter how you get it?"
(and I did read the thread on the Word tracking, which looks like a good system for a formal group, but requires everyone to have Word, and probably won't work nearly as well for a more informal system that we have in the public forums.)
I think that you will find a surprising amount of Hatrackers use (or have the ability to convert to) MSWord.
quote:
And do folks prefer the overall comments to be added to the end of the story, or included in the email? Again, I'm willing to do what the author prefers if they say it (well, within reason...).
I've seen and done them either way or both ways. Generally, I like to give the author a little indication of what he's/she's in for. So, I use the comments throughout; major, elaborate thoughts I put into a comment tagged to the last paragraph; and I give a a couple of important thought--not wholly elaborating on them--in the email's body.
I don't think that there is or has been a steady standard for Hatrack critiques--other than critique content.
Free Open Office:
http://www.openoffice.org/
Also, they have versions for most operating systems. From the website:
quote:
Platforms currently supported include Microsoft Windows (98 - Vista), GNU/Linux ("Linux"), Sun Solaris, Mac OS X (under X11), and FreeBSD.
Part of the reason that I don't like comments is that they can be hard for sight-impaired people to read. Also, the different colors in track changes are even more portable than the comments feature.